The importance of patient selection in bariatric surgery: One not fit for all. Case report of a preventable double severe complication after Laparoscopic gastric banding positioning.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a minimal invasive, effective and reversible procedure, even if it is burdened by life threatening complications. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: A 39 years-old female patient was admitted to our emergency department for abdominal pain and ileus and underwent an explorative laparoscopy. The LAGB was wrapped around the proximal portion of the stomach determining the erosion and ischemia of the great curvature region. It was removed and a large gastric resection of the great curvature was performed. Subsequently, a gastric leak with pleural abscess occurred with the beginning of the oral diet. It was successfully treated with fasting, intravenous antibiotics and a thoracic tube. DISCUSSION: LAGB is a restrictive procedure that compartmentalizes the upper stomach by placing a tight adjustable band around it. However severe and multiple complications can also occur. Slippage is one of the most frequent and dangerous complication. Partial gastric resection (comparable to sleeve gastrectomy) or total/subtotal gastrectomy on the limit of the scarring tissue is use requested in the latter case, with a high risk of postoperative leak. A strict postoperative follow-up is mandatory in order to early recognize any severe complications. CONCLUSION: Strict follow-up in this special subset of patients, the bariatric ones, is mandatory in order to early identify and correct any postoperative complications, avoiding severe sequelae.

Management of Slipped Gastric Bands via Creation of a De Novo Tunnel and Band Replacement: a Single-Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: A lack of clarity remains over the optimal strategy for the management of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) slippage, which, although rare (around 3% in our experience), can when acute result in obstruction, gastric erosion or ischaemia. Typically, slipped bands are removed acutely. The aim of this study was to explore outcomes following immediate or delayed resiting of slipped LAGBs in a single centre, comparing simple repositioning with retunnelling and replacement. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of computerised records, notes and prospectively maintained bariatric databases was undertaken to identify all patients with a slipped LAGB in a single centre. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients required operative intervention following a diagnosis of slipped LAGB (median time from initial LAGB insertion to slippage 2.9 years). Two (6%) patients underwent band removal and 30 (94%), band revision surgery (25 immediately and five at a planned but expedited procedure).Twenty-four (77%) patients underwent insertion of a new LAGB via a de novo retrogastric tunnel, five (21%) of which required further future operative intervention; whereas, six (23%) patients underwent repositioning of the existing LAGB within the same tunnel, five (83%) of which underwent further operative intervention (log-rank test p = 0.0001). Following LAGB revision, there was no significant further change in BMI (median + 1 kg/m2; range - 13 to + 10 kg/m2). CONCLUSION: Resiting of slipped LAGBs is safe and maintains weight loss. Although a significant risk of future operative intervention remains, this can be reduced via the creation of a de novo retrogastric tunnel for band resiting.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with gastric plication: midterm outcomes in terms of weight loss and short term complications.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a safe procedure with variable outcomes and large standard deviations. LAGB with gastric plication (LAGBP) is a new restrictive procedure that combines the lap band with gastric plication. This procedure, with its mechanism being below the band anatomically, should augment the weaknesses of the lap band: slips and inadequate weight loss. OBJECTIVE: Compare the weight loss results and complication rates between the LAGB and LAGBP. SETTING: Private practice. METHODS: Data was analyzed data from 120 patients retrospectively from 2 surgeons at a single private institution. Seventy-six patients underwent LAGB, and 44 other patients underwent LAGBP between February 2011 and July 2013. All 120 patients are beyond the 1-year postoperative mark and 110 patients are beyond the 2-year postoperative mark. A subset analysis was performed comparing data from both procedures to evaluate weight loss and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between preoperative age, weight, and body mass index between the patients who underwent either procedure. We had 47.4% and 52.3% follow-up at 1 year for LAGB and LAGBP, respectively, with 91.5% and 92.3% follow-up at 2 year for LAGB and LAGBP, respectively. Complications were low with LAGBP; however, it was not statistically significant (P = .54). The LAGBP had a greater percent excess weight loss, percent total weight loss, and percent excess body mass index lost compared with the LAGB at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months, and these differences were statistically significant. Mean percent excess weight loss for LAGB and LAGBP was 28.3% and 34.5% (P<.05) at 1 year and 32.1% and 39.2% (P<.05) at 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: LAGBP is a safe, feasible, and reproducible bariatric procedure. The LAGBP performs significantly better than the LAGB for weight loss. The complication and revision rates were slightly higher with LAGB than LAGBP. However, it was not statistically significant.

Laparoscopic Treatment of a Large Gastric Pouch Following Gastric Band Slippage.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric band slippage with formation of a gastric pouch is a frequent complication after gastric banding. There is no consensus on the treatment of this condition, which differs within and between centers. Here, we describe our treatment of a large gastric pouch after gastric band slippage. Despite removal of the band, the pouch caused oral feeding intolerance. METHODS: The video shows our treatment of large gastric pouch following gastric banding and surgical revision. A 45-year-old woman with history of gastric banding was referred to our center for persistent oral feeding intolerance following gastric band removal. RESULTS: We found that a large gastric pouch was responsible for extrinsic compression and thus required revisional surgery after optimization of the patient's nutritional status. Video endoscopy revealed a large gastric pouch, which was responsible for oral feeding intolerance. Intra-operative exploration then revealed major adhesions, which had probably caused the pouch to form. During surgery that was somewhat analogous to sleeve gastrectomy, we removed the adhesions and resected the gastric pouch. The operating time was 70 min. An uneventful postoperative course enabled rapid discharge (on postoperative day 2). CONCLUSION: The formation of a large gastric pouch is a rare complication of chronic gastric band slippage. Following nutritional optimization, surgery is required.

Acute Abdominal Pain in the Bariatric Surgery Patient.

Obesity is present in epidemic proportions in the United States, and bariatric surgery has become more common. Thus, emergency physicians will undoubtedly encounter many patients who have undergone one of these procedures. Knowledge of the anatomic changes specific to these procedures aids the clinician in understanding potential complications and devising an organized differential diagnosis. This article reviews common bariatric surgery procedures, their complications, and the approach to acute abdominal pain in these patients.

Management modalities in slipped gastric band.

BACKGROUND: Gastric band slippage is one of the possible complications of the laparoscopic gastric band (LGB). Band slippage can present as an emergency and have drastic consequences. We herein report the different treatment modalities of slipped gastric band. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients presenting with slipped gastric band between May 2013 and January 2015 at our University hospital is described. All patients were evaluated at the time of presentation by radiological studies and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. On diagnosis, all bands were deflated in an attempt to relieve symptoms. After patient counseling and band position evaluation, patients were consented for either removal or repositioning of the band. RESULTS: This study included 100 patients. Gastric band slippage rate was 8%. All patients presented with signs of gastric obstruction and expressed a long history of intermittent vomiting attacks. All patients were subjected to a complete gastric band deflation on presentation. Band deflation successfully relieved symptoms and reversed band slippage in 2 patients. However, both patients returned with band reslippage within the same month. The other 6 patients had persistent band slippage despite complete band deflation. Three of the 8 patients had a successful band repositioning, and the rest had their gastric bands removed. CONCLUSION: Gastric band slippage can be a serious LGB complication. Repeated vomiting can be a significant risk factor for band slippage. Moreover, band repositioning can be a well-tolerated and feasible option in the management of slipped gastric band.

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Slippage Rates Following Laparoscopic Gastric Band Insertion: a Single Centre Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGB) are placed around the superior aspect of the stomach to aid weight loss and co-morbidity resolution in morbidly obese patients. Slippage of the LAGB from its original position to lower in the fundus of the stomach leads to gastric obstruction, and sometimes ischaemia or perforation, necessitating LAGB repositioning or removal. This study aimed to identify the incidence of LAGB slippage, as well as predisposing factors that may influence its development. METHODS: All LAGBs inserted at one centre, via a pars flaccida technique, by four Bariatric specialist consultants, were reviewed utilising a prospectively maintained Bariatric database, computer records and case notes review. RESULTS: Seven hundred nineteen LAGBs were inserted and 33 slips treated; however, only 22 slips had their LAGB inserted at our centre (local slip rate 3.1 %). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between LAGB slip and younger median age at LAGB insertion (41 years slip vs. 45 years non-slip; p = 0.027), higher median total excess weight loss (64 % slip vs. 36 % non-slip; p < 0.001) and higher mean excess weight loss per month (2.41 % slip vs. 1.00 % non-slip; p < 0.001). There was no significant effect by sex, BMI at insertion or band type. CONCLUSIONS: Band slips are associated with greater excess weight loss and younger age. Larger studies may be necessary to further elucidate the risk factors contributing to, and mechanisms of, band slippage.

Gastric band slippage: a case-controlled study comparing new and old radiographic signs of this important surgical complication.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of four radiographic signs of gastric band slippage: abnormal phi angle, the "O sign," inferior displacement of the superolateral gastric band margin, and presence of an air-fluid level above the gastric band. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the electronic medical record identified 21 patients with a surgically proven slipped gastric band and 63 randomly-selected asymptomatic gastric band patients who had undergone barium swallow studies. These studies were evaluated for the four signs of band slippage by two independent radiologists who were blinded to clinical data. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each radiographic sign of band slippage. Interobserver agreement between radiologists was assessed using the Fleiss kappa statistic. RESULTS: In evaluating for gastric band slippage, an abnormal phi angle greater than 58° was 91-95% sensitive and 52-62% specific (κ = 0.78), the O sign was 33-48% sensitive but 97% specific (κ = 0.84), inferior displacement of the superolateral band margin by more than 2.4 cm from the diaphragm was 95% sensitive and 97-98% specific (κ = 0.97), and the presence of an air-fluid level was 95% sensitive and 100% specific (κ = 1.00). CONCLUSION: We report two previously undescribed radiographic signs of gastric band slippage that are both sensitive and specific for this important surgical complication and recommend that these signs should be incorporated into the imaging evaluation of gastric band patients.

Three-year experience of pouch dilatation and slippage management after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

PURPOSE: Pouch dilatation and band slippage are the most common long-term complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The aim of the study is to present our experience of diagnosis and management of these complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pars flaccida technique with anterior fixation of the fundus was routinely used. All band adjustments were performed under fluoroscopy. We analyzed the incidence, clinico-radiologic features, management, and revisional surgeries for treatment of these complications. We further presented the outcome of gastric plication techniques as a measure for prevention of these complications. RESULTS: From March 2009 to March 2012, we performed LAGB on 126 morbidly obese patients. Among them, 14 patients (11.1%) were diagnosed as having these complications. Four patients (3.2%) had concentric pouch dilatations, which were corrected by band adjustment. Ten (7.9%) had eccentric pouch with band slippage. Among the ten patients, there were three cases of posterior slippage, which were corrected by reoperation, and seven cases of eccentric pouch dilatation with anterior slippage. Three were early anterior slippage, which was managed conservatively. Two were acute anterior slippage, one of whom underwent a revision. There were two cases of chronic anterior slippage, one of whom underwent a revision. The 27 patients who underwent gastric plication did not present with eccentric pouch with band slippage during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The incidence of pouch dilatation with/without band slippage was 11.1%. Management should be individualized according to clinico-radiologic patterns. Gastric plication below the band might prevent these complications.

Three-Year Experience of Pouch Dilatation and Slippage Management after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

PURPOSE: Pouch dilatation and band slippage are the most common long-term complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The aim of the study is to present our experience of diagnosis and management of these complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pars flaccida technique with anterior fixation of the fundus was routinely used. All band adjustments were performed under fluoroscopy. We analyzed the incidence, clinico-radiologic features, management, and revisional surgeries for treatment of these complications. We further presented the outcome of gastric plication techniques as a measure for prevention of these complications. RESULTS: From March 2009 to March 2012, we performed LAGB on 126 morbidly obese patients. Among them, 14 patients (11.1%) were diagnosed as having these complications. Four patients (3.2%) had concentric pouch dilatations, which were corrected by band adjustment. Ten (7.9%) had eccentric pouch with band slippage. Among the ten patients, there were three cases of posterior slippage, which were corrected by reoperation, and seven cases of eccentric pouch dilatation with anterior slippage. Three were early anterior slippage, which was managed conservatively. Two were acute anterior slippage, one of whom underwent a revision. There were two cases of chronic anterior slippage, one of whom underwent a revision. The 27 patients who underwent gastric plication did not present with eccentric pouch with band slippage during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The incidence of pouch dilatation with/without band slippage was 11.1%. Management should be individualized according to clinico-radiologic patterns. Gastric plication below the band might prevent these complications.

Band Slippage after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB)

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has proved to be safe and effective, worldwide. The perigastric technique was once the most frequent method of band placement, but posterior prolapse was a problem. The introduction of the pars flaccida technique has considerably reduced the incidence of this complication, and, currently, this technique is the most utilized method and recommended by most bariatric surgeons. However, LAGB with pars flaccida technique has rare complications such as band slippage and gastric pouch dilatation in 2~5% of patients. We have experienced 2 band replacement cases for band slippage and pouch dilatation each happening about 1 and 2 years after LAGB.