Impact of imaging-diagnosed sarcopenia on outcomes in patients with biliary tract cancer after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sarcopenia has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with malignant tumors. However, its impact on the outcomes of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) undergoing surgical resection remains unclear and warrants further review. This study aims to summarize the available evidence on this issue. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies up to March 10, 2024. We extracted data on overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and postoperative major complications from the included studies as the outcomes of interest. Following data synthesis and analysis, we assessed the heterogeneity and performed subgroup analyses. Additionally, the potential for publication bias was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies involving 4292 BTC patients were ultimately retrieved. The findings indicated that sarcopenia was significantly associated with reduced OS in BTC patients after surgery (adjusted HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.65-2.48, P < 0.001, I2 = 57.4%). Moreover, sarcopenia may also be linked to poorer RFS (adjusted HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.79-2.59, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and increased postoperative major complications (OR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, P = 0.033, I2 = 29.2%) as well. Notably, no significant publication bias was detected through funnel plots and Egger's tests. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia is associated with poorer OS in BTC patients following surgery. Additionally, it may serve as a prognostic indicator for poorer RFS and increased postoperative major complications. Further studies are warrant to standardize existing definitions and validate these findings.

Transmembrane serine protease 4 expression in the prognosis of radical resection for biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in biliary tract cancer (BTC) treatment have expanded beyond surgery to include adjuvant therapy, yet the prognosis remains poor. Identifying prognostic biomarkers could enhance the assessment of patients who have undergone radical resection for BTC. AIM: To determine transmembrane serine protease 4 (TMPRSS4) utility as a prognostic biomarker of radical resection for BTC. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent radical resection for BTC, excluding intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, were retrospectively reviewed. The associations between TMPRSS4 expression and clinicopathological factors, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 85 patients undergoing radical resection for BTC, 46 (54%) were TMPRSS4-positive. The TMPRSS4-positive group exhibited significantly higher preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) values and greater lymphatic invasion than the TMPRSS4-negative group (P = 0.019 and 0.039, respectively). Postoperative overall survival and recurrence-free survival were significantly worse in the TMPRSS4-positive group (median survival time: 25.3 months vs not reached, P < 0.001; median survival time: 28.7 months vs not reached, P = 0.043, respectively). Multivariate overall survival analysis indicated TMPRSS4 positivity, pT3/T4, and resection status R1 were independently associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.032, 0.035 and 0.030, respectively). TMPRSS4 positivity correlated with preoperative CA19-9 values ≥ 37 U/mL and pathological tumor size ≥ 30 mm (P = 0.016 and 0.038, respectively). CONCLUSION: TMPRSS4 is a potential prognostic biomarker of radical resection for BTC.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer.

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC), published in late 2022 were adapted in December 2023, according to established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with BTC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with BTC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. Drug access and reimbursement in the different regions of Asia are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with BTC across the different countries and regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices and molecular profiling, as well as age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different countries.

Focusing on the Immune Cells: Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) represents a challenging malignancy characterized by aggressive behavior, high relapse rates, and poor prognosis. In recent years, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for various cancers, but its efficacy in BTC remains limited. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the advances in preclinical and clinical studies of immunotherapy for BTC. We explore the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in reshaping the management of BTC. Despite disappointing results thus far, ongoing clinical trials are investigating the combination of immunotherapy with other treatment modalities. Furthermore, research on the tumor microenvironment has unveiled novel targets for immunotherapeutic interventions. By understanding the current state of immunotherapy in BTC and highlighting future directions, this article aims to fuel further exploration and ultimately improve patient outcomes in this challenging disease.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine combination therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: a phase 2, nonrandomized, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly malignant tumor, with limited therapy regimens and short response duration. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine as the first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced BTC. METHODS: In this phase 2, nonrandomized, prospective study, eligible patients received camrelizumab (200 mg, d1, Q3W), apatinib (250 mg, qd, d1-d21, Q3W), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m², bid, d1-d14, Q3W) until trial discontinued. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: From July 2019 to April 2023, we enrolled a total of 28 patients, of whom 14 patients were in the first-line treatment setting and 14 patients were in the second-line setting. At the data cutoff (April 30, 2023), the median follow-up duration was 18.03 months. Eight of 28 patients reached objective response (ORR: 28.57%), with an ORR of 50% and 7.1% for first-line and second-line treatment patients (P = .033). The median PFS was 6.30 months and the median OS was 12.80 months. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 9 (32.14%) patients, including elevated transaminase, thrombocytopenia, etc. No serious treatment-related AEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine showed promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC, especially in the first-line setting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04720131.

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Background: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to further explore the impact of the addition of immunotherapy to gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Methods: Literature research was performed, and hazard ratio values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the tau-squared estimator ( τ 2 ) . The total Cochrane Q test (Q) was also assessed. The overall survival rate, objective response rate, and progression-free survival in the selected studies were assessed. Results: A total of 1,754 participants were included. Heterogeneity among the studies selected was found to be non-significant (p = 0.78; tau2 = 0, I2 = 0%). The model estimation results and the forest plot suggested that the test for the overall effect was significant (Z = -3.51; p< 0.01). Conclusion: The results of the current meta-analysis further confirm the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus gemcitabine-cisplatin as the new standard first-line treatment for advanced BTC patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023488095.

A plain language summary of the results from the phase 2b HERIZON-BTC-01 study of zanidatamab in participants with HER2-amplified biliary tract cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: Researchers wanted to study whether the research drug zanidatamab could help people with a type of cancer called biliary tract cancer. In some people, biliary tract cancer cells make extra copies of a gene called HER2 (also called ERBB2). This is known as being HER2-amplified. Zanidatamab is an antibody designed to destroy cancer cells that have higher-than-normal HER2 protein or gene levels. Zanidatamab is currently under research and is not yet approved for any diseases. Participants in this phase 2b clinical study had tumors that were HER2-amplified and at the advanced or metastatic stage. Participants also had cancer which had become worse after previous chemotherapy or had side effects that were too bad to continue chemotherapy. They also had to meet other requirements to be enrolled. Researchers measured the amount of HER2 protein in the tumor samples of the participants who were enrolled. There were 80 participants with tumors that were both HER2 amplified and had higher-than-normal HER2 protein amounts (considered to be 'HER2-positive'). There were 7 participants with tumors that were HER2-amplified, but had little-to-no levels of the HER2 protein (considered to be 'HER2-low'). All participants in the study were treated with zanidatamab and no other cancer treatments once every 2 weeks. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS?: In the HER2-positive group, 33 of 80 (41%) participants had their tumors shrink by 30% or more of their original size. In half of these participants, their tumors did not grow for 13 months or longer. No participant in the HER2-low group had their tumors shrink by 30% or more. In total, 63 of 87 participants (72%) had at least one side effect believed to be related to zanidatamab treatment. Most side effects were mild or moderate in severity. No participant died from complications related to zanidatamab. Diarrhea was one of the more common side effects and was experienced by 32 of 87 participants (37%). Side effects related to receiving zanidatamab through the vein, such as chills, fever, or high blood pressure, were experienced by 29 of 87 participants (33%). WHAT ARE THE CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: The results of this study support the potential for zanidatamab as a new therapy for people with HER2-positive biliary tract cancer after they had already received chemotherapy. More research is occurring to support these results.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04466891 (HERIZON-BTC-01 study).

The HERIZON-BTC-01 study revealed zanidatamab as a potentially effective treatment for HER2-positive biliary tract cancer after standard chemotherapy fails. Read more in the lay summary by @hardingjjmd, @DrShubhamPant, and coauthors. #BiliaryTractCancer #HER2 #zanidatamab.

Antibody-drug conjugates for hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies: "Magic bullets" to the rescue?

Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) malignancies constitute a highly aggressive group of cancers that have a dismal prognosis. Patients not amenable to curative intent surgical resection are managed with systemic chemotherapy which, however, confers little survival benefit. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) are tripartite compounds that merge the intricate selectivity and specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the cytodestructive potency of attached supertoxic payloads. In view of the unmet need for drugs that will enhance the survival rates of HPB cancer patients, the assessment of ADCs for treating HPB malignancies has become the focus of extensive clinical and preclinical investigation, showing encouraging preliminary results. In the current review, we offer a comprehensive overview of the growing body of evidence on ADC approaches tested for HPB malignancies. Starting from a concise discussion of the functional principles of ADCs, we summarize here all available data from preclinical and clinical studies evaluating ADCs in HPB cancers.

Real-world treatment patterns, resource utilization and costs in biliary tract cancers in the USA.

Aim: To evaluate real-world treatment patterns, survival and healthcare-resource utilization in US patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) receiving systemic therapy.Patients & methods: This study used claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) linked to clinical data from the Cancer Care Quality Program (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2020).Results: Of 413 patients, 84.5% received gemcitabine-based first-line (1L) treatment, 46% received second-line treatment, and 16.5% received third-line (3L) treatment. All-cause mortality was 53% and approximately 70% of patients had ≥1 inpatient visit. The total mean per-patient-per-month all-cause costs were $19,589 for 1L and $33,534 for 3L treatment.Conclusion: Results showed poor survival, significant resource use and high costs as treatment line progresses for patients with advanced BTC.

Our research explored which treatments US patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) received and how long they lived for. We analyzed information from a US database, called the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®), which holds information related to healthcare insurance claims. Out of 413 patients in the database, 84.5% were initially given a combination treatment involving a chemotherapy called gemcitabine. We also found that 46% of patients received a type of second treatment (also known as second-line therapy), and 16.5% received a third treatment (third-line therapy). During treatment, around 70% of patients needed to stay in hospital at least once. The cost of healthcare was more expensive for patients receiving later lines of therapy, with the average monthly cost per patient for first-line treatment being $19,589 and third-line treatment being $33,534. Furthermore, just over half of the 413 patients died from any causes, showing the poor outlook these patients face. This information is important for understanding the real-world management of patients with BTC, so that their care can be improved in the future.

Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer in China and the US.

Background: Pembrolizumab is a potentially valuable treatment. However, patients, doctors, and healthcare decision-makers are uncertain about its cost-effectiveness and an appropriate pricing for this new therapy. This study aims to appraise the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients in China and the United States (US). Methods: A Markov model was constructed from the perspectives of healthcare systems in both China and the US for pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Patient baseline characteristics and key clinical data were sourced from the KEYNOTE-966 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04003636). Costs and utilities were collected from drug cost websites and published literature. Cumulative costs (in USD), life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured and compared. Price simulations were conducted under given willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds to provide pricing scheme references. The model's robustness was analyzed through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Basic data analysis illustrates that pembrolizumab ($2662.41/100 mg) in combination with chemotherapy regimen was not cost-effective relative to chemotherapy regimens at the WTP threshold of $38,201.19 in China, and the additional cost relative to chemotherapy regimens was $77,114.94 (ICER $556,689.47/QALY) while increasing 0.14 QALYs. Pembrolizumab ($54.71/1 mg) also increased efficacy by 0.14 QALYs in the US, but remained also not cost-effective at the US WTP threshold of $229,044, and the total cost increased by $160,425.24 (ICER $1,109,462.92/QALY). Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy reduces the disease of burden. However, at its current price, it may not be a cost-effective treatment for advanced BTC in both China and the US. This study can aid decision-makers in making optimal choices.

Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers: An open-label, non-randomized, phase II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options. AIM: To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs. METHODS: This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.

Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Combination with S-1, Durvalumab, or Pembrolizumab as First-Line Triple Treatment for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.

PURPOSE: The clinical effectiveness of triple chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus either S-1 (GCS), durvalumab (DGC), or pembrolizumab (PGC) as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has been reported. However, their comparative cost-effectiveness is unclear. We conducted a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Japanese healthcare payer. METHODS: A 10-year partitioned survival model was constructed by comparing the time-dependent hazards of the KHBO1401-MITSUBA, TOPAZ-1, and KEYNOTE-966 trials. The cost and utility came from previously published reports. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were used to measure the effects on health. Costs for direct medical care were taken into account. There was a one-way analysis and a probability sensitivity analysis. A willingness-to-pay threshold of 7.5 million yen (57,034 USD) per QALY was defined. RESULTS: The incremental costs per QALY for GCS, DGC, and PGC in the base case study were 3,779,374 JPY (28,740 USD), 86,058,056 JPY (65,4434 USD), and 28,982,059 JPY (220,396 USD), respectively. No parameter had an influence beyond the threshold in a one-way sensitivity analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the probability of GCS, DGC, and PGC being cost-effective at the threshold was 85.6%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the current circumstances, it is probable that triple therapy utilizing GCS will emerge as a plausible and efficient primary chemotherapy strategy for patients with advanced BTC in the Japanese healthcare system, as opposed to DGC and PGC.

Utility of Transpapillary Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Comprehensive Genome Profiling of Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer.

Tissue sampling in biliary tract cancer (BTC) is generally performed through transpapillary biopsy (TPB) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA). For the first time, we compared the suitability of specimens obtained using TPB and EUS-TA to determine the optimal tissue-sampling method for comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) analysis in patients with unresectable BTC (UR-BTC). Pathology precheck criteria for CGP analysis comprised the OncoGuide NCC Oncopanel System (NCCOP) and FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx). Seventy-eight patients with UR-BTC (35 TPB and 43 EUS-TA) were included. The NCCOP analysis suitability achievement rate was higher in EUS-TA specimens than in TPB specimens (34.9% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.007), whereas that of F1CDx was 0% in both groups. EUS-TA was identified as an independent factor that contributed to the suitability of the NCCOP analysis. The suitability of the NCCOP analysis of EUS-TA specimens showed a tendency to be higher for mass lesions (43.8% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.065), especially for target size ≥ 18.5 mm, and lower for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (0% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.077). In TPB, papillary-type lesions (66.7% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.016) and peroral cholangioscopy-assisted biopsies (50.0% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.029) showed better potential for successful NCCOP analysis. EUS-TA is suitable for NCCOP analysis in UR-BTC and may be partially complemented by TPB.

Radiofrequency ablation via catheter and transpapillary access in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (ACTICCA-2 trial) - a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label investigator-initiated trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent advances in cancer treatment, the therapeutic options for patients with biliary tract cancer are still very limited and the prognosis very poor. More than 50% of newly diagnosed patients with biliary tract cancer are not amenable to curative surgical treatment and thus treated with palliative systemic treatment. Malignant bile duct obstructions in patients with perihilar and/or ductal cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents one of the most important challenges in the management of these patients, owning to the risk represented by developing life-threatening cholangitis which, in turn, limits the use of systemic treatment. For this reason, endoscopic stenting and/or bile duct decompression is the mainstay of treatment of these patients. Data on efficacy and safety of adding radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to biliary stenting is not conclusive. The aim of this multicenter, randomized trial is to evaluate the effect of intraductal RFA prior to bile duct stenting in patients with unresectable perihilar or ductal CCA undergoing palliative systemic therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: ACTICCA-2 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, investigator-initiated trial. 120 patients with perihilar or ductal CCA with indication for biliary stenting and systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to receive either RFA plus bile duct stenting (interventional arm) or bile duct stenting alone (control arm). Patients will be stratified by trial site and tumor location (perihilar vs. ductal). Both arms receive palliative systemic treatment according to the local standard of care determined by a multidisciplinary tumorboard. The primary endpoint is time to first biliary event, which is determined by an increase of bilirubin to > 5 mg/dl and/or the occurrence of cholangitis leading to premature stent replacement and/or disruption of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, safety according to NCI CTCAE v5, quality of life assessed by questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BIL21), clinical event rate at 6 months after RFA and total days of over-night stays in hospital. Follow-up for the primary endpoint will be 6 months, while survival assessment will be continued until end of study (maximum follow-up 30 month). All patients who are randomized and who underwent endoscopic stenting will be used for the primary endpoint analysis which will be conducted using a cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model with a frailty for trial site and fixed effects for the treatment group, tumor location, and stent material. DISCUSSION: ACTICCA-2 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to assess efficacy and safety of adding biliary RFA to bile duct stenting in patients with CCA receiving palliative systemic treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06175845) and approved by the local ethics committee in Hamburg, Germany (2024-101232-BO-ff). This manuscript reflects protocol version 1 as of January 9th, 2024.

Prognostic impact of combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S-1 and subsequent conversion surgery for initially unresectable upper biliary tract cancers.

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND: For the past decade, there have been few chemotherapy options for unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). Recently, however, combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S-1 (GCS) has been identified as a promising strategy. This retrospective study analyzes the clinical results of GCS therapy and subsequent conversion surgery (CS). METHOD: We analyzed the clinical data of 60 consecutive patients who received GCS therapy for unresectable upper BTC at our university hospital during the 5 years between September, 2018 and December, 2022. RESULTS: All patients received GCS therapy as first-line chemotherapy. The response rate was 33.9% and subsequent CS was performed in 35.0%. Of the patients who underwent CS, 81% required more than bisectionectomy of the liver with extrahepatic bile duct resection. The median overall survival of the patients who received GCS therapy and underwent subsequent CS was significantly longer than that of the patients who received GCS therapy alone (28.0 months vs. 12.4 months, respectively; p < 0.001). A decrease in the CA19-9 level 1 month after chemotherapy and RECIST PR were independent positive predictors of CS, whereas unresectable gallbladder cancer and pretreatment ALBI grade 3 were negative predictors of CS. CONCLUSION: GCS therapy and subsequent CS may contribute to the longer term survival of patients with unresectable upper BTC.

Association between gut microbiota and hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancer: A mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies have begun to discuss the relationship between gut microbiota and diseases, yet there is currently a lack of corresponding articles describing the association between gut microbiota and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aims to explore the relationship between them using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis method. AIM: To assess the relationship between gut microbiota and HCC and BTC. METHODS: We obtained Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for the gut microbiome from the intestinal microbiota genomic library (MiBioGen, https://mibiogen.gcc.rug.nl/). Additionally, we accessed data pertaining to HCC and BTC from the IEU open GWAS platform (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). Our analysis employed fundamental instrumental variable analysis methods, including inverse-variance weighted, MR and Egger. To ensure the dependability of the results, we subjected the results to tests for multiple biases and heterogeneity. RESULTS: During our investigation, we discovered 11 gut microbiota linked to an increased risk to BTC and HCC. The former included the genus Eubacterium hallii group (P = 0.017), Candidatus Soleaferrea (P = 0.034), Flavonifractor (P = 0.021), Lachnospiraceae FCS020 (P = 0.034), the order Victivallales (P = 0.018), and the class Lentisphaeria (P = 0.0.18). The latter included the genus Desulfovibrio (P = 0.042), Oscillibacter (P = 0.023), the family Coriobacteriaceae (P = 0.048), the order Coriobacteriales (P = 0.048), and the class Coriobacteriia (P = 0.048). Furthermore, in BTC, we observed 2 protective gut microbiota namely the genus Dorea (P = 0.041) and Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group (P = 0.045). All results showed no evidence of multiplicity or heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: This study explores a causal link between gut microbiota and HCC and BTC. These insights may enhance the mechanistic knowledge of microbiota-related HCC and BTC pathways, potentially informing therapeutic strategies.

Remarkable response to capmatinib in a patient with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring TFG-MET fusion.

Dysregulation of mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) gene due to amplification, mutation, and fusion has been reported in various types of human cancers. Recently, the efficacy of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting MET has been demonstrated in a wide range of MET-dysregulated tumors. The majority of biliary tract cancers including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and the utility of conventional chemotherapy is limited. Here, we present a case of metastatic iCCA harboring TFG-MET gene fusion, which demonstrated a remarkable response to treatment with capmatinib, a selective MET inhibitor. The patient was a 46-year-old man diagnosed with iCCA with hepatic, intraabdominal lymph nodes, and peritoneal metastases. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) revealed TFG-MET gene fusion in his tumor. After becoming refractory to standard chemotherapy, he received capmatinib, which resulted in a marked shrinkage of the liver masses and lymph node metastases, as well as a drastic decrease in serum CA19-9 level. Our case reinforces the importance of CGP in exploring targeted therapy and supports the potential role of capmatinib in the treatment of tumors harboring MET fusions.

Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a heterogeneous group of aggressive malignancies that arise from the epithelium of the biliary tract. Most patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. For patients with unresectable BTC, the survival advantage provided by systemic chemotherapy was limited. Over the last decade, immunotherapy has significantly improved the therapeutic landscape of solid tumors. There is an increasing number of studies evaluating the application of immunotherapy in BTC, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), cancer vaccines and adoptive cell therapy. The limited response to ICIs monotherapy in unselected patients prompted investigators to explore different combination therapy strategies. Early clinical trials of therapeutic cancer vaccination and adoptive cell therapy have shown encouraging clinical results. However, there still has been a long way to go via validation of therapeutic efficacy and exploration of strategies to increase the efficacy. Identifying biomarkers that predict the response to immunotherapy will allow a more accurate selection of candidates. This review will provide an up-to-date overview of the current clinical data on the role of immunotherapy, summarize the promising biomarkers predictive of the response to ICIs and discuss the perspective for future research direction of immunotherapy in advanced BTC.

PARP inhibitor therapy in patients with IDH1 mutated cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) missense mutations occur at a frequency of 10%-15% in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). IDH1 mutations result in accumulation of (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, an oncometabolite that leads to DNA hypermethylation and impairment of homologous recombination (HR). Impairment of HR results in a "BRCAness" phenotype which may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort review to identify patients with advanced, IDH1 mutated iCCA treated with a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) at the University of Michigan between 2018 and 2023. Patients are described with respect to prior lines of therapy, response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of PARPi initiation. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2023 we identified 40 patients with IDH1 mutated iCCA of which 6 patients were treated with a PARPi as monotherapy or in combination with an ATR inhibitor or anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor. Majority of patients (n = 5) carried an IDH1 R132C mutation per tissue-based next generation sequencing. All patients had previously received at least one line of cisplatin-based systemic therapy for advanced disease prior to treatment with PARPi. PFS and OS from time of PARPi initiation ranged from 1.4 to 18.5 months and 2.8 to 42.4 months, respectively. Best response on PARPi therapy included 2 partial responses. CONCLUSION: This is the first case series to describe PARPi treatment in IDH1 mutated iCCA. Results underscore the limitation of PARPi monotherapy, potentially support combined PARPi therapies, and highlight a need for effective treatment options for patients with IDH1 mutated iCCA.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: A large real-life worldwide population.

BACKGROUND: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a global multicenter retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes. METHODS: We included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin at 39 sites in 11 countries (Europe, the United States, and Asia). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 666 patients were enrolled. Median OS was 15.1 months and median PFS was 8.2 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 32.7 %, with stable disease in 45.2 % of patients. High baseline CEA levels, ECOG PS > 0, metastatic disease, and NLR > 3 were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 92.9 % of patients (grade >2: 46.6 %). Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 20.0 % (grade >2: 2.5 %). Three deaths (0.5 %) were deemed treatment-related, none linked to immunotherapy. Common irAEs were rash (8.2 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2), itching (10.3 % all grades; 0.2 % grade >2), and hypothyroidism (5.1 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2). Durvalumab discontinuation rate due to AEs was 1.5 %. ESMO-recommended genes were analyzed and no outcome differences were found. A comparative analysis with a historical cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone confirmed the positive survival impact of durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine. CONCLUSION: This first global real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.