Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology in Iranian Elderly Population; an Analysis of the Iranian National Registry for Cancer (2009-2014 Years).

Background: We aimed to investigate the patterns of incidence and prevalence of bone sarcoma (BS) and soft tissue sarcoma (STS), morphology as well as geographical distribution in the elderly in Iran. Methods: By the primary site of the tumor and the morphological types, whole cases of cancer were classified. Then, the WHO classification (2018) and the third revision of the standard International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3) were used to assign a code to them. The estimated incidence rates were obtained as the frequency of the newly-diagnosed cases within one year divided by the calculated population of the mid-year Iranian residents as estimated by the Iranian Bureau of Statistics. The age-standardized incidence rates were also estimated for both bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Results: The annual crude incidence rates of sarcomas in males (0.80 per 100,000) were more than in females (0.55 per 100,000) in all years. The total combined crude incidence in 2014 years was obtained at 0.67 per 100,000 people. In terms of disease grade majority of the patients were of grade 3 (11.5 %). In terms of tumor location, the Lower extremity was 16.8%, the Visceral (including gastrointestinal & uterus) 15.8%, the Thoracic 12.8%, and the Pelvic & abdominal wall 9.7%. Conclusion: Even though such sarcoma is more prevalent in elderly men, its incidence was also observed in lower-aged female groups. In addition, the incidence rate of BS was lower in comparison with that of STS, and the patients often exhibited an unknown degree of sarcoma.

Assessing Sarcoma Awareness Among the General Population in Minnesota: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study from the Minnesota State Fair in 2015 and 2022.

Sarcomas are commonly misdiagnosed, and treatment delays negatively impact patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to explore patient threshold for and timeline to medical evaluation, to identify providers most likely to be contacted first, and to assess general sarcoma knowledge in Minnesota's general population. Voluntary participants were recruited at the 2015 and 2022 Minnesota State Fair to complete a three-part survey. Part 1 assessed evaluation timeline and provider choice, part 2 evaluated sarcoma knowledge via a ten-question survey, and part 3 documented demographics. Responses were electronically recorded, and results were tabulated. Overall, 2124 participants completed some or all of the survey. Part 1: Participants indicated they would seek more urgent treatment for a painful mass compared to a non-painful mass (p < 0.001). The majority (77%) of participants indicated a family medicine physician would be their first contact for painful and non-painful masses. Part 2: There was no difference in overall score (percent correct) when comparing results from 2015 (mean = 40%) to 2022 (mean = 42%) (p = 0.183). Overall, 16% (349/2117) of participants had no correct responses. Individuals who self-identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity and a non-White race performed worse (p < 0.001). In general, scores improved with increased education and those with a graduate or professional degree had an estimated 2.515-point increase in score compared to participants with some high school education or high school diploma/general education diploma (p < 0.001). Participants with a healthcare background scored better (p < 0.001). Pain is a driving factor for patient-initiated evaluation, and primary care providers are the most likely first contact for patients. General sarcoma awareness remains low, even among those with advanced degrees and healthcare experience. Ongoing educational efforts are warranted for both the general public and healthcare communities in Minnesota.

Validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score for lower extremity in patients with bone sarcoma or giant cell tumour of bone undergoing bone resection and reconstruction surgery in hip and knee.

BACKGROUND: The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS) is widely used to evaluate functioning following surgery for bone and soft-tissue sarcoma. However, concerns have been raised about its content validity due to the lack of patient involvement during item development. Additionally, literature reports inconsistent results regarding data quality and structural validity. This study aimed to evaluate content, structural and construct validity of the Danish version of the MSTS for lower extremity (MSTS-LE). METHODS: The study included patients from three complete cohorts (n = 87) with bone sarcoma or giant cell tumour of bone who underwent bone resection and reconstruction surgery in hip and knee. Content validity was evaluated by linking MSTS items to frameworks of functioning, core outcome sets and semi-structured interviews. Data quality, internal consistency and factor analysis were used to assess the underlying structure of the MSTS. Construct validity was based on predefined hypotheses of correlation between the MSTS and concurrent measurements. RESULTS: Content validity analysis revealed concerns regarding the MSTS. The MSTS did not sufficiently cover patient-important functions, the item Emotional acceptance could not be linked to the framework of functioning, the items Pain and Emotional acceptance pertained to domains beyond functioning and items' response options did not match items. A two-factor solution emerged, with the items Pain and Emotional acceptance loading highly on a second factor distinct from functioning. Internal consistency and construct validity showed values below accepted levels. CONCLUSION: The Danish MSTS-LE demonstrated inadequate content validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. In addition, our analyses did not support unidimensionality of the MSTS. Consequently, the MSTS-LE is not a simple reflection of the construct of functioning and the interpretation of a sum score is problematic. Clinicians and researcher should exercise caution when relying solely on MSTS scores for assessing lower extremity function. Alternative outcome measurements of functioning should be considered for the evaluation of postoperative function in this patient group.

Principles of Defect Reconstruction After Wide Resection of Primary Malignant Bone Tumors of the Calcaneus: A Contemporary Review.

Visual AbstractThis is a visual representation of the abstract.

Setting the international research agenda for sarcomas with patients and carers: results of phase II of the Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network (SPAGN) priority setting partnership.

BACKGROUND: Typically, researchers and clinicians determine the agenda in sarcoma research. However, patient involvement can have a meaningful impact on research. Therefore, the Patient-Powered Research Network (PPRN) of the Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network (SPAGN) set up a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP). The primary objective of this partnership is to identify priorities for research and patient advocacy topics. METHODS: In the first phase of this PSP, including 264 sarcoma patients and carers from all over the world, 23 research topics regarding sarcomas and 15 patient advocacy topics were identified using an online survey. In the second phase, participants were asked to fill in a top five and a top three of research and patient advocacy topics, respectively. Additionally, sociodemographic characteristics and sarcoma characteristics were collected. Social media channels, local national patient advocacy groups and the SPAGN website were used to distribute the survey. RESULTS: In total, 671 patients (75%) and carers (25%) participated in this survey. The five highest ranked research topics were related to causes of sarcoma (43%), prognosis and risk of recurrence (40%), specific subtypes of sarcoma (33%), the role of immunotherapy, targeted therapy and combined therapy (30%), and hereditary aspects (30%). The three highest ranked patient advocacy topics were improving the diagnostic process of sarcoma (39%), access to tumor DNA analysis (37%) and establishing an international sarcoma registry (37%). CONCLUSIONS: This sarcoma PSP has identified priorities for research and patient advocacy, offering guidance for researchers, assisting funding agencies with assessing project relevance and empowering patient advocates to represent the needs of patients and carers.

Comparison of clinical outcome between surgical treatment and particle beam therapy for pelvic bone sarcomas: A retrospective multicenter study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the clinical outcomes of patients with pelvic bone sarcomas treated surgically and those treated with particle beam therapy. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study which compared the clinical outcomes of patients with pelvic bone sarcoma who underwent surgical treatment and particle beam therapy in Japan. METHODS: A total of 116 patients with pelvic bone sarcoma treated at 19 specialized sarcoma centers in Japan were included in this study. Fifty-seven patients underwent surgery (surgery group), and 59 patients underwent particle beam therapy (particle beam group; carbon-ion radiotherapy: 55 patients, proton: four patients). RESULTS: The median age at primary tumor diagnosis was 52 years in the surgery group and 66 years in the particle beam group (P < 0.001), and the median tumor size was 9 cm in the surgery group and 8 cm in the particle beam group (P = 0.091). Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among 116 patients with bone sarcoma (surgery group, 57 patients; particle beam group, 59 patients). After propensity score matching, the 3-year OS, LC, and MFS rates were 82.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.5-93.2%), 66.0% (95% CI, 43.3-81.3%), and 78.4% (95% CI, 55.5-90.5%), respectively, in the surgery group and 64.9% (95% CI, 41.7-80.8%), 86.4% (95% CI, 63.3-95.4%), and 62.6% (95% CI, 38.5-79.4%), respectively, in the particle beam group. In chordoma patients, only surgery was significantly correlated with worse LC in the univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The groups had no significant differences in the OS, LC, and MFS rates. Among the patients with chordomas, the 3-year LC rate in the particle beam group was significantly higher than in the surgery group.

The Impact of Expert Pathology Review and Molecular Diagnostics on the Management of Sarcoma Patients: A Prospective Study of the Hellenic Group of Sarcomas and Rare Cancers.

Precise classification of sarcomas is crucial to optimal clinical management. In this prospective, multicenter, observational study within the Hellenic Group of Sarcoma and Rare Cancers (HGSRC), we assessed the effect of expert pathology review, coupled with the application of molecular diagnostics, on the diagnosis and management of sarcoma patients. Newly diagnosed sarcoma patients were addressed by their physicians to one of the two sarcoma pathologists of HGSRC for histopathological diagnostic assessment. RNA next-generation sequencing was performed on all samples using a platform targeting 86 sarcoma gene fusions. Additional molecular methods were performed in the opinion of the expert pathologist. Therefore, the expert pathologist provided a final diagnosis based on the histopathological findings and, when necessary, molecular tests. In total, 128 specimens from 122 patients were assessed. Among the 119 cases in which there was a preliminary diagnosis by a non-sarcoma pathologist, there were 37 modifications in diagnosis (31.1%) by the sarcoma pathologist, resulting in 17 (14.2%) modifications in management. Among the 110 cases in which molecular tests were performed, there were 29 modifications in diagnosis (26.4%) through the genomic results, resulting in 12 (10.9%) modifications in management. Our study confirms that expert pathology review is of utmost importance for optimal sarcoma diagnosis and management and should be assisted by molecular methods in selected cases.

The prediagnostic general practitioner care of sarcoma patients: A real-world data study.

BACKGROUND: Limited understanding exists regarding early sarcoma symptoms presented during general practitioner (GP) consultations. The study explores GP visit patterns and recorded diagnoses in the 12 months preceding sarcoma diagnosis. METHODS: Sarcoma cases diagnosed from 2010 to 2020 were identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry alongside general practice data. Sarcoma cases were age and gender matched to cancer-free controls (2:1 or 1:1 ratio). RESULTS: A total of 787 individuals with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) and 188 individuals with bone sarcoma (BS) were identified. There was a significant difference in monthly GP contacts from 4 months to the last month before STS diagnosis, and 2 months before BS diagnosis between cases and controls. Most prevalent diagnoses recorded by the GP for STS cases included musculoskeletal neoplasm (26.6%), uncomplicated hypertension (15.6%), and cystitis/other urinary infections (12.2%). For BS cases, musculoskeletal neoplasm (42.8%), knee symptoms/complaints (9.7%), and shoulder symptoms/complaints (9.7%) were most frequent. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: A significant difference in GP contacts between cases and controls preceding sarcoma diagnosis. STS cases were predominantly diagnosed with nonspecific symptoms, whereas BS cases with diagnoses more suggestive of BS. Better understanding of the prediagnostic trajectory could aid GPs in early identification of sarcoma.

Analysis of foot-originating malignant bone tumors: Epidemiology, characteristics, and survival outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The study examines the characteristics and outcomes of foot-originating malignant bone tumors via Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database analysis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 14,695 malignant bone tumor cases from 2000 to 2019 was conducted. RESULTS: Of the eligible cases, 147 (2.3 %) were foot-origin tumors, typically smaller and more commonly treated with surgery than those in other locations. These tumors were more frequently treated with surgical resection, with a higher proportion undergoing amputation. In contrast, foot-origin tumors were less often managed with chemotherapy and radiation. Foot-origin tumors exhibited higher survival rates compared to non-foot-origin tumors as shown in univariate analysis, although multivariate analysis did not reflect significant differences. CONCLUSION: Foot-originating malignant bone tumors tend to be smaller and are frequently surgically treated, correlating with favorable survival outcomes. These findings point to early detection as a potential factor in the improved survival rates, not necessarily the tumor's origin.

Statistics of bone sarcoma in Japan: report from the population-based cancer registry in Japan.

BACKGROUND: No previous reports have characterized national bone sarcoma profiles overall. We examined the nationwide statistics for bone sarcoma in Japan using data from the National Cancer Registry (NCR), a population-based cancer registry. METHODS: We identified 3,755 patients with bone sarcomas entered in the NCR during 2016-2019 using International Classification of Diseases-Oncology, Third Edition codes for cancer topography and morphology. We extracted data on patient demographics, tumor details (reason for diagnosis, tumor location, histology, extent of disease), hospital volume/type, treatment, and prognosis for each patient. RESULTS: Bone sarcoma showed a slight male preponderance. The age distribution peaked at ages 10-20 and 60-80; approximately 44% of patients were aged over 60 years. Chordoma, chondrosarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone peaked in the elderly, and Ewing's sarcoma peaked in children. Osteosarcoma had two peaks in Japan as well as in Western countries. The most frequent tumor locations were the limb (45%) and the pelvis (21%). Extent of disease was categorized as: "localized" (39%), "regional" (27%), and "distant" (11%). We found significant associations between overall survival and age, tumor location, facility type, hospital volume, histologic subtype, reason for diagnosis, and extent of disease. The latter had the poorest survival. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to outline the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, prognosis, and significant factors affecting prognosis of bone sarcoma in Japan using the NCR. Documenting our data regarding elderly patients' outcomes is essential so other countries showing similar population-aging trends can learn from our experiences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic studies, Level III.

Periosteal Ewing Sarcoma with Distant Metastases: Report of Two Patients and Review of the Literature.

Periosteal Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an exceedingly rare topographic subtype of the ES. To our knowledge, only 60 patients have been reported in the medical English language literature. It predominantly affects men in the second decade of life and arises in the long tubular bone diaphysis. PES rarely develops distant metastases. We report two patients of this rare ES location that were found on the distal tibial shaft and proximal femoral diaphysis of a 21-year-old man and an 8-year-old boy, respectively. Both patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, wide resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy. One of our patients had lung metastases at the time of diagnosis and died 5 years later. The other patient presented intramedullary humeral bone metastasis 19 years after diagnosis. There has been no evidence of disease in the 26 years of follow-up. Close follow-up of periosteal ES is recommended because distant metastases may exceptionally occur, even several years after diagnosis.

What Is the Impact of Multimodal Treatment in Patients with Leiomyosarcoma of Bone? A Multicenter Study of 35 Patients with an Ultra-Rare Tumor Entity.

Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone (LMSoB) is extremely rare, comprising only <0.7% of primary malignant bone tumors, and is therefore considered an ultra-rare tumor entity. There is currently no consensus as to whether therapeutic strategies should be based on the biological characteristics of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma or on primary tumor localization in the bone. The use of perioperative chemotherapy and its effectiveness in this rare tumor entity remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different treatment approaches in a multicenter setting with a total of 35 patients included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74%. Patients with localized disease undergoing surgery had a significantly higher 5-year OS compared to patients who did not undergo surgical treatment (82% vs. 0%, p = 0.0015). Axial tumor localization was associated with worse event-free survival (EFS) probability (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.0082). A high proportion of our patients developed secondary metastases. Furthermore, the perioperative chemotherapy protocols applied to our patients were not associated with an improved EFS or OS. Therefore, the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in LMSoB needs to be further investigated, and the choice of agents still needs to be clarified.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Romanian Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for Patients with Extremity Bone Sarcomas.

Background and Objectives: Primary malignant bone tumors are rare lesions, and their complex treatment can lead to functional impairment. It is important to have a postoperative assessment tool for patients' functional outcomes to be evaluated and to consequently adapt future treatments in the pursuit of a continuous improvement of their quality of life. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS) is a validated specific system score that is used frequently in the follow-up of these patients. We found no information about a valid translated Romanian version of this score neither for the upper limb nor for the lower limb. We proposed in this study to translate the original version of the MSTS Score into Romanian and to perform validation analysis of the Romanian-language MSTS Score. Materials and Methods: We selected 48 patients who underwent limb-salvage surgery after resection of bone sarcomas. Patients were interrogated twice according to the translated Romanian version of the MSTS Score during their follow-up. The translation was performed according to the recommended guidelines. A total number of 96 questionnaires were valid for statistical analysis. Results: Internal consistency and reliability were good for both sets of questionnaires' analytic measurements, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.848 (test) and 0.802 (retest). The test-retest evaluation proved to be statistically strong for reproducibility and validity with Spearman's rho = 0.9 (p < 0.01, 95% CI). Conclusions: This study permitted the translation of this score and the validation of psychometric data. Our results showed that the Romanian version of the MSTS is a reliable means of assessment of the functional outcome of patients who received limb-salvage surgery for the upper and lower extremities.

Obesity increases the risk of major wound complications following pelvic resection for bone sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Given the paucity of data, the objective of this study is to evaluate the association between obesity and major wound complications following pelvic bone sarcoma surgery specifically. METHODS: Patients who underwent pelvic resection for bone sarcoma from 2005 to 2021 with a minimum 6-month follow-up were reviewed. Patients with benign tumors, primary soft tissue sarcomas, local recurrence at presentation, pelvic metastatic disease, and underweight patients were excluded. A major wound complication was defined as the need for a secondary debridement procedure. Differences in baseline demographics, surgical factors, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were compared between obese and nonobese patients. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for major wound complications, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate overall survival between both groups. RESULTS: Of the 93 included patients, 21 were obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2). The obesity group had a significantly higher rate of major wound complication (52% vs. 26%, p = 0.034) and a lower Toronto Extremity Salvage Score at 1-year postoperatively (47.5 vs. 71.4, p = 0.025). Obesity was the only independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis. No differences in overall survival were demonstrated between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is a significant risk factor for major wound complications in pelvic bone sarcoma treatment. This highlights the importance of careful perioperative optimization and wound management.

Expandable endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients: Where we are.

Approximately 45 percent of malignant bone tumors are seen under the age of 16 and one of the important results of growth plate sacrification in patients with immature skeletons is limb inequality. Until the early 1990s, the treatment options for these patients were rotationplasty or amputation. Multimodal approaches that combine imaging, chemotherapy, and surgical techniques have enabled the development of limb-preserving methods with satisfactory results. In order to overcome inequality problems, expandable prostheses have been developed in the 1980s. Extendable endoprosthesis replacements have been improved over the years and are now an established and safe alternative. Noninvasive prostheses appear to be advantageous compared to minimally invasive expandable prostheses that require multiple surgical procedures, but the complication rate remains high. Therefore, although expandable prostheses are not the definitive answer to the treatment of bone sarcomas in skeletally immature children, they are still a suitable interim choice until full adulthood is achieved. Due to reported high complication rates, the procedures require significant experience and are recommended for use only in specialized cancer centers.

Amputation surgery associated with shortened survival in patients with localized extremity bone sarcoma.

Background: This study assesses survival rates among patients with localized extremity bone sarcoma who have undergone amputation, pinpointing subpopulations that are disproportionately affected by amputation-related survival disparities. Methods: Examination of data was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, analyzing records of 3765 patients diagnosed with localized extremity bone sarcoma between 2000 and 2019. Of these, 857 received amputations (Amputation cohort), and 2908 underwent limb-sparing surgeries. Propensity score matching, considering demographic and clinical features, was utilized to ensure a fair comparison. Results: Following propensity score matching, the study focused on 1714 cases. The Amputation cohort was observed to have significantly poorer survival rates (Cancer-Specific Survival [CSS]: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.28, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.05-1.55; Overall Survival [OS]: HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.15-1.63). Subsequent subgroup analysis indicated that individuals with tumors exceeding 8 cm in size or those located in the lower limbs were notably at a higher risk of shortened survival (for tumors >8 cm - CSS: HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-1.71; OS: HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.09-1.76; for lower limb tumors - CSS: HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.54; OS: HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.11-1.61). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that patients diagnosed with localized extremity bone sarcoma undergoing amputation exhibit lower survival rates, especially in cases involving tumors of greater size or those situated in the lower limbs. In patient groups where amputation is inevitable, careful follow-up is required after surgical intervention.

Recycled bone grafts treated with extracorporeal irradiation or liquid nitrogen freezing after malignant tumor resection.

INTRODUCTION: Recycled bone autografts prepared using extracorporeal irradiation (ECIR) or liquid nitrogen freezing (LNF) methods have been used for the reconstruction of skeletal elements after wide resection of sarcomas involving bone tissues. Few reports include long-term follow-up data for histological analyses of recycled autografts, particularly in the case of ECIR autografts. MATERIALS: A total of 34 malignant bone and soft tissue tumors were resected and reconstructed using 11 ECIR- and 23 LNF-recycled autografts; the mean postoperative follow-ups were 14 and 8 years, respectively. ECIR was used for either osteosarcomas or Ewing sarcomas, whereas in addition to these tumors LNF was used for chondrosarcomas and soft tissue sarcomas involving bone tissues. Recycled bone was implanted as total bone, osteoarticular, or intercalary grafts, with or without prosthesis or vascularized fibular grafts. RESULTS: The 10-year graft survival rate was similar between groups, 81.8% using ECIR and 70.2% using LNF. There were no autograft-related tumor recurrences in either group. Graft survival was unrelated to type of graft or additional procedures. Complication rates tended to be higher using ECIR (64%) compared with LNF (52%) and the infection rate was significantly higher with ECIR (27%) versus LNF (0%). At the final assessment, plain radiographs revealed original recycled bone was present in 7 of 11 ECIR cases and in zero cases treated with LNF autografts, indicating that recycled bone treated with LNF autografts was remodeled into new bone. Histological examination of ECIR-treated bones revealed a delayed and incomplete endochondral ossification process, necrosis and empty lacunae. Conversely, LNF autografts showed remodeled bones with normal trabecular structures. CONCLUSIONS: ECIR and LNF treatment of autografts provided adequate tumor control with acceptable clinical results as a reconstruction method.

Effectiveness of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Older Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aging population is expected to increase the occurrences of bone sarcoma (BS) and soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is reported to be effective for BS and several STSs. However, the effect of CIRT on clinical outcomes, functional prognoses, and quality of life (QOL) in older patients who underwent CIRT has not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of CIRT on clinical outcomes, functional prognoses and QOL in older patients with BS or STS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 235 patients aged >70 years with BS or STS who underwent CIRT. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC) were evaluated in chordoma and non-chordoma patients. Furthermore, factors associated with post-CIRT Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) index were assessed. RESULTS: The overall 5-year LC, OS, and CSS rates were 81%, 62%, and 76%, respectively. In the chordoma and non-chordoma groups, the 5-year LC, OS, and CSS rates were 84%, 72%, and 87%; and 77%, 47%, and 60%, respectively. The mean post-CIRT TESS and EQ-5D-5L index were 75% and 0.71, respectively. The TESSs and EQ-5D-5L indices tended to be better among males, younger patients (<76 years old), patients with small tumor volumes, and patients with chordoma. CONCLUSION: CIRT is effective for older patients with BS, especially with chordoma, and STS with good LC and survival rates. Furthermore, post-treatment limb function and QOL were comparable with those of the other treatments and age groups.

A deep learning model for accurately predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with primary bone sarcoma of the extremity: a population-based study

Purpose Primary bone and joint sarcomas of the long bone are relatively rare neoplasms with poor prognosis. An efficient clinical tool that can accurately predict patient prognosis is not available. The current study aimed to use deep learning algorithms to develop a prediction model for the prognosis of patients with long bone sarcoma. Methods Data of patients with long bone sarcoma in the extremities was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database from 2004 to 2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to select possible prediction features. DeepSurv, a deep learning model, was constructed for predicting cancer-specific survival rates. In addition, the classical cox proportional hazards model was established for comparison. The predictive accuracy of our models was assessed using the C-index, Integrated Brier Score, receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration curve. Results Age, tumor extension, histological grade, tumor size, surgery, and distant metastasis were associated with cancer-specific survival in patients with long bone sarcoma. According to loss function values, our models converged successfully and effectively learned the survival data of the training cohort. Based on the C-index, area under the curve, calibration curve, and Integrated Brier Score, the deep learning model was more accurate and flexible in predicting survival rates than the cox proportional hazards model. Conclusion A deep learning model for predicting the survival probability of patients with long bone sarcoma was constructed and validated. It is more accurate and flexible in predicting prognosis than the classical CoxPH model (AU)

Enhanced accuracy and reduced delay in diagnosing bone tumors within an expert sarcoma network: A nationwide study.

INTRODUCTION: Primary bone tumors encompass a range of rare and diverse lesions. Pathological diagnosis poses significant challenges, with histological discrepancies extensively studied in soft tissue sarcomas but lacking specific investigation in bone lesions. This study aimed to determine the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies in primary bone tumors, assessing whether initial histological analysis within an expert referral center network reduces this rate and final diagnostic delay. Additionally, we examined the impact of mandatory systematic re-reading by expert pathologists on diagnostic variation and readjustment. METHODS: Our study cohort comprised patients with primary bone tumors, drawn from the national prospective French sarcoma network database. A total of 1075 patients were included from 2018 to 2019. RESULTS: The cohort exhibited a major discrepancy rate of 24%. Within the expert referral centers network, 49 cases (7%) showed major diagnostic discrepancies in the initial analysis, compared to 207 cases (57%) outside the network (p < 0.001). Regarding the final diagnostic delay, a mean of 2.8 weeks (±4.9) was observed within the network, contrasting with 6.5 weeks (±9.1) outside the network (p < 0.001). Systematic re-reading by an expert pathologist facilitated diagnosis readjustment in 75% of the 256 cases, with 68% of all diagnostic variations occurring preoperatively. CONCLUSION: Early management within the expert network significantly reduced major diagnostic discrepancies and shortened the diagnosis delay by approximately a month. Expert pathologist systematic re-readings were responsible for diagnosis readjustments in three-quarters of cases, with two-thirds of all diagnostic variations occurring preoperatively, thereby mitigating the consequences of mistreatment.