Profiling injuries sustained following implementation of a progressive load carriage program in United States marine corps recruit training.

BACKGROUND: Load carriage tasks during United States Marine Corps (USMC) recruit training can cause injury. Load carriage conditioning, if optimized, can reduce injury risk. OBJECTIVE: To compare injuries sustained by USMC recruits following participation in either the Original Load Carriage (OLC) program or a Modified Load Carriage (MLC) program. METHODS: Retrospective musculoskeletal injury data were drawn from the USMC San Diego Sports Medicine injury database for recruits completing the OLC (n = 2,363) and MLC (n = 681) programs. Data were expressed as descriptive statistics and a population estimate of the OLC:MLC relative risk ratio (RR) was calculated. RESULTS: The proportion of injuries sustained in the MLC cohort (n = 268; 39% : OLC cohort, n = 1,372 : 58%) was lower, as was the RR (0.68, 95% CI 0.61- 0.75). The leading nature of injury for both cohorts was sprains and strains (OLC n = 396, 29%; MLC n = 66; 25%). Stress reactions were proportionally higher in MLC (n = 17, 6%; OLC n = 4, 0.3%), while stress fractures were proportionately lower (MLC n = 9, 3%; OLC n = 114, 8%). Overuse injuries were lower in MLC (- 7%). The knee, lower leg, ankle, and foot were the top four bodily sites of injuries and the Small Unit Leadership Evaluation (SULE), Crucible, overuse-nonspecific, running, and conditioning hikes were within the top five most common events causing injury. The prevalence rates of moderate severity injury were similar (MLC = 23%; OLC = 24%), although MLC presented both a higher proportion and prevalence of severe injuries (MLC = 6%; OLC = 3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A periodized load carriage program concurrently increased exposure to load carriage hikes while reducing injuries both during the load carriage hikes and overall.

Effects of an Experiential Trauma Bootcamp on PGY 3 Anesthesiology Residents' Knowledge and Confidence Levels.

Background: Bootcamp-style education involves short, intense educational sessions and is a proven educational modality in anesthesia medical education. However, rarely has it been used with senior anesthesiology residents and never in exposing these residents to a curriculum aimed at care of the trauma patient. The purpose of this study was to design and implement an experiential bootcamp to prepare anesthesiology residents to take senior trauma call at a Level 1 trauma center in the Southeastern United States. Methods: Before taking senior trauma call, 21 postgraduate year 3 anesthesiology residents took part in an 8-hour trauma bootcamp that combined flipped classroom-style education with immersive, procedural, and augmented reality simulation facilitated by subject matter experts. Before and after the bootcamp, residents completed 17-item confidence and 20-item knowledge questionnaires developed by the study authors. Results were compared before and after the bootcamp to determine overall change in confidence and knowledge levels pertaining to caring for trauma patients and taking senior trauma call. Additionally, residents completed an evaluation measuring their perceptions of the benefit of the educational offering. Results: Statistically significant increases were seen in 16 out of 17 confidence questions (P < .001) and 12 out of 20 knowledge questions (P < .001). Additionally, respondents indicated that they found the content to be valuable and likely to improve their care delivery within the clinical setting. Conclusions: Following this bootcamp, postcourse surveys demonstrated that residents' knowledge and confidence increased significantly through simulation combined with a flipped-classroom approach in preparation for senior trauma call.

Simulation Based Mastery Learning of Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) education is part of pediatric cardiology fellow training. Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) is an efficient and valuable education experience. The aim of this project was to equip trainees with the basic knowledge and skill required to perform a pediatric TEE. The secondary aim was to assess the utility of using SBML for pediatric TEE training. The target group is trainees from pediatric cardiology and cardiac anesthesia who participated in a TEE bootcamp. A baseline knowledge pretest was obtained. The knowledge session consisted of preparation via reading material, viewing recorded lectures and completing an iterative multiple-choice examination, which was repeated until a minimum passing score of 90% was achieved. The skills session involved a review of TEE probe manipulation and image acquisition, followed by rapid cycle deliberate practice using simulation to acquire TEE skills at 3 levels, advancing in complexity from level 1 to level 3. Eight individuals (7 pediatric cardiology fellows at varying training levels and one anesthesia attending) participated in the TEE bootcamp. All reached a minimum knowledge post test score of at least 90% before the skills session. All subjects reached mastery in TEE probe manipulation. All reached mastery in image acquisition for the skill level that they attempted (level 1-8/8, level 2-8/8, level 3-4/4, with 4 participants not attempting level 3). A TEE bootcamp using SBML is a powerful medical education strategy. SBML is a rigorous approach that can be used to achieve high and uniform TEE learning outcomes among trainees of different training levels and backgrounds.

Technology-enhanced learning in orthopaedics: Virtual reality and multi-modality educational workshops may be effective in the training of surgeons and operating department staff.

AIM: The aims were to assess the utility of: 1) virtual reality-mediated simulation, and 2) a multi-modality 'Bootcamp' in the delivery of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) teaching to orthopaedic surgical trainees. BACKGROUND: Surgical training opportunities are diminished as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic which may result in delays to training completion and gaps in the permanent workforce. Modern and technology-enhanced learning methods have been identified as having the potential to support high-quality and sustainable education. METHODS: This mixed-methods study assessed the educational benefit of two activities designed to teach TKA to junior (ST1-3) orthopaedic trainees. A multi-modality training Bootcamp was delivered that included: virtual reality (VR) and saw-bone simulation; tutorials, and case-based symposia. The VR component was delivered to different participants (surgical trainees, scrub nurses, and consultants) on a further two separate occasions. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected pertaining to utility and performance. RESULTS: Trainees reported that the Bootcamp improved comprehension of arthroplasty principles including component alignment, knee balancing, and intraoperative strategies. Case-based discussions helped develop diagnostic and decision-making skills. The VR activity improved understanding of the surgical process map, increased ability to anticipate steps, and consider the procedure strategically. All staff groups found the VR activity beneficial and would recommend it as a useful addition to a surgical department. CONCLUSION: VR-mediated simulation could augment the education of surgical trainees and scrub team staff by improving comprehension of the surgical process map. Integrated multi-modality 'Bootcamp-style' training activities constructed around trainees' needs may provide a sustainable solution to bridge the experience gap related to reduced exposure to elective orthopaedic practice.

Impact of a postgraduate year one (PGY-1) otolaryngology bootcamp on procedural skill development.

Background: To measure the impact of an intensive eight-week postgraduate year one (PGY-1) otolaryngology bootcamp on the acquisition and retention of otolaryngology residents' procedural skills compared to the traditional method of skill acquisition through clinical exposure. Methods: Residents at our institution were evaluated on their performance of flexible laryngoscopy, suture ligature, and rigid bronchoscopy setup at three time points: pre-bootcamp, one-week post-bootcamp, and one-year post-bootcamp. Video recordings were scored by two blinded faculty reviewers using a multipoint rating system. A control group of rising postgraduate year two (PGY-2) residents who did not participate in bootcamp were recorded performing these same skills. Scores in the three skills were compared between groups via t-tests. The eight-week bootcamp curriculum for PGY-1s was held at the Montefiore Einstein Center for Innovation in Simulation at Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center. The participants were two classes of PGY-1 residents (n=8) at our institution who participated in a bootcamp at the beginning of residency, and one class of rising PGY-2 residents (n=3) who did not participate in a bootcamp (control group). Results: A comparison of pre-bootcamp scores to one-week post-bootcamp scores showed significant improvement in suture ligature ( P<0.05) and rigid bronchoscopy ( P<0.05), but no difference in flexible laryngoscopy ( P=0.54). Suture ligature ( P=0.09) and rigid bronchoscopy ( P=0.25) skills were not significantly different from one-week post-bootcamp to one-year post-bootcamp; however, a significant skill improvement was observed in flexible laryngoscopy ( P<0.05). By June of PGY1 year, the two bootcamp cohorts were similar to controls in all three skills: flexible laryngoscopy ( P=0.05), rigid bronchoscopy ( P=0.26), and suture ligature ( P=0.10). Conclusions: Participation in PGY-1 bootcamp was associated with improved acquisition and short-term retention of basic procedural skills, suggesting that bootcamps can be an effective arena to teach basic skills in otolaryngology. PGY-1 bootcamp is a promising arena for multi-institutional development.

Pilot Study: Increasing Confidence in Obstetrics and Gynecology Applicants Through a Prep Course Prior to Audition Rotations.

INTRODUCTION: As more medical schools schedule the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 after the completion of clinical rotations in their curriculum, students are finding themselves increasingly removed from the clinical setting prior to their audition rotations. In the military, these audition rotations are important for matching into competitive specialties, such as Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob-Gyn). This pilot study explores the confidence and audition readiness of prospective candidates through their participation in an Ob-Gyn preparatory course. METHODS: Rising fourth year medical students applying for an Ob-Gyn residency attended an in-person review session. It consisted of four interactive presentations addressing rotation resources, labor and delivery triage, postpartum care, laparoscopic anatomy review, and concluded with a resident question and answer panel. These attendees completed a pre- and post-course survey on Google Forms. Categorical answers were recorded as response frequency and Likert scales were converted into a 5-point system for analysis. RESULTS: A 100% response rate from attendees revealed pre-course 81.8% confidence in performing well on an audition rotation with only 27% feeling prepared in terms of their medical knowledge. After completion of the course, all participants reported increased medical knowledge and recommended the course to other students. CONCLUSIONS: Preparatory courses for Ob-Gyn residency candidates can increase confidence and preparedness for audition rotations and, ultimately, internship. As the residency application process becomes more competitive, departments can take steps such as hosting a preparatory course to best assist their students into matching and provide skills that they can practice heading into internship.

Embracing uncertainty: medical student perceptions of a pediatric bootcamp developed in response to mandated changes during the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The start of the COVID-19 pandemic led to both shortened clinical rotations and consequent loss of embedded formal teaching time. In response to these learning gaps, a novel, virtual pediatric bootcamp was developed to provide a consolidated 3-week learning opportunity for clinical medical students. Pre-clinical students were encouraged but not required to participate, given the suspension of clinical patient experiences for all undergraduate medical learners and the uncertainty of when clinical rotations would resume. This group of students were particularly challenged with adapting their learning in response to the pandemic while also preparing to apply their pre-clinical knowledge to solve clinical problems. METHODS: A qualitative thematic analysis was used for this study. Ten semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with second-year medical students to explore their experiences and perceptions of the pediatric bootcamp. The six phases of thematic analysis proposed by Braun and Clark guided data analysis. To ensure rigour, the three aspects of rigour-credibility, transferability and confirmability were utilized throughout the project. RESULTS: Qualitative exploration from semi-structured phone interviews of second-year medical students' perceptions and experiences of this new and unanticipated learning experience revealed four main themes: (a) clinical relevance, describing how students were pushed to think about clinical problems in a new way; (b) timing, which explored conflicts related to competing interests, mental preparedness, and the interval between learning and application; (c) teaching strategies, describing how active learning and interaction were facilitated and challenges that arose; and (d) learning resources, highlighting the curated and accessible resources made available to the students, as well as those resources that learners develop for themselves. CONCLUSIONS: A novel three-week online case-based pediatric bootcamp fostered application of knowledge for clinical reasoning at a time when students were transitioning from preclinical to clinical learning. Students were stretched to balance competing priorities, and the bootcamp curated synchronous and asynchronous learner opportunities while allowing them to reflect on their own learning styles and effective virtual learning strategies. While bootcamps are often used to prepare learners for transitions between clinical stages, our findings suggest the bootcamp format can also facilitate transition from preclinical to clinical roles.

Perception Precedes Reality: A Simulation and Procedural Bootcamp Improves Residents' Comfort With Transitioning to Clinical Anesthesiology Training.

Background The transition from internship to clinical anesthesiology (CA) training is often difficult given the differences in workflow, procedures, environment, and clinical situations. The primary aims of this study were to determine if a standardized introductory bootcamp could improve clinical knowledge and self-perceived comfort level of new anesthesiology residents in performing common operating room procedures and management of common intraoperative problems. The secondary aim of the study was to see if a standardized bootcamp could be replicated at other programs. Methods The introduction to anesthesiology resident bootcamp was developed at one institution in 2015 then expanded to a second program in 2019. The bootcamp was a one-day experience consisting of simulation and task trainers that all rising first-year CA residents (CA-1) participated in during their first month of anesthesiology training. All participating residents were given a survey immediately before and after the bootcamp. The average ratings of the questions were calculated and used as the primary measure. The Anesthesia Knowledge Test (AKT) was used as a surrogate measure of participant knowledge. Results From 2015 to 2020, a total of 105 residents completed the pre-survey and 109 completed the post-survey across the two sites. The improvement in average rating was significant (Pre: 2.04±0.46 versus Post: 3.09±0.52 p<0.0001). Individual item analysis also showed significant improvement on all of the eight items (p<0.0001). Analyses by site revealed the same results at both average score and item level. There was no significant cohort difference in either AKT-0 (Control: 57.84±26.86 versus Intervention 50.13±25.14, p=0.14) or AKT-1 (Control: 41.06±26.42 versus Intervention 41.70±26.60, p=0.90) percentile scores. Conclusions Incorporation of an introduction to anesthesia bootcamp for new residents significantly improves participant comfort level and is reproducible across institutions. However, it does not improve resident performance on standardized tests.

The Surgical Skills and Technology Elective Program and Medical Student Career Choice.

INTRODUCTION: The Surgical Skills and Technology Elective Program (SSTEP) is a bootcamp for preclinical medical students that uses simulation learning methodology to provide exposure to procedural specialties and enhance surgical skills. Despite the widespread adoption of similar bootcamps, evidence is lacking regarding their impact on students' decision to pursue surgical/procedural careers. METHODS: This exploratory analysis consisted of a retrospective, cross-sectional assessment of SSTEP involving a survey examining engagement during clerkship rotations and career decision-making was sent to all SSTEP participants since the program's inception (n = 184). In addition, publicly available data through the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) were used to compare match data between all SSTEP participants who have participated in the CaRMS match (n = 144) and students in corresponding years who did not participate in SSTEP (n = 351). RESULTS: Seventy-four SSTEP participants (40.2%) responded to the survey. Of the respondents, the majority agreed or strongly agreed that SSTEP influenced participants to engage in more procedural opportunities during clerkship (73%) and that they felt more confident performing procedural tasks during clerkship because of SSTEP (92%). Fifty percent of participants agreed that their anxiety decreased regarding clinical specialty decision. Thirty percent of participants indicated that SSTEP influenced them to pursue a procedural career. Examination of CaRMS data showed that 42% of SSTEP participants matched into direct-entry procedural specialties compared with 32% of non-SSTEP graduating medical students at our institution (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis supports the utility of preclerkship surgical bootcamps. By providing early exposure to procedural skills, SSTEP promoted engagement with procedural skills during clerkship. Participation in SSTEP influenced student career choice, which may have contributed to the increased match rate into procedural specialties for SSTEP participants.

A systematic review of methodological principles and delivery of surgical simulation bootcamps.

BACKGROUND: The growth of "bootcamp style" simulation training in surgical practice has been exponential over the last decade. Developing and delivering a surgical bootcamp requires a significant investment. This systematic review aims to identify the key components that allow for a successful and rewarding surgical bootcamp course to be implemented that can be applied to all surgical specialities. METHODS: To understand the surgical bootcamp principles and delivery mechanisms, we searched peer-reviewed, English language studies published between 2000 and 21. RESULTS: From 137 articles, 14 studies with a Medical Education Research Quality Instrument Score of >11.5 were included. Most studies followed the core components; delivery at transition (12), mapping syllabus (13), multimodality delivery (14), and deliberate practice with formative feedback (12) apart from 1:1 training by only 2 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests that Surgical bootcamp can be an extremely useful education tool for trainees if 5 pillars of a boot camp are respected.

Going the (social) distance: Comparing the effectiveness of online versus in-person Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization procedural training.

BACKGROUND: This study compares surgical residents' knowledge acquisition of ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization (US-IJCVC) between in-person and online procedural training cohorts before receiving independent in-person Dynamic Haptic Robotic Simulation training. METHODS: Three surgical residency procedural training cohorts, two in-person (N = 26) and one online (N = 14), were compared based on their performance on a 24-item US-IJCVC evaluation checklist completed by an expert physician completed after training. Pre- and post-training US-IJCVC knowledge was also compared for the online cohort. RESULTS: No significant change in the pass rates on the US-IJCVC checklist was found between in-person and online cohorts (p = 0.208). There were differences in the Economy of Time and Motion between in-person and online cohorts (p < 0.005). The online cohort had significant increases in US-IJCVC knowledge pre-to post-training (p < 0.008). CONCLUSION: Online training with independent simulation practice was as effective as in-person training for US-IJCVC.

BEST of Surgical Training: the pan-London Core Surgical Training induction programme: "There's no I in team, but there is a me."

BACKGROUND: In the UK, Core Surgical Training (CST) marks the start of a surgical career, but previous experience and skills vary widely. Whilst Individual hospital Trusts offer local inductions, these are generally of a generic, administrative nature rather than advising trainees on how best to harness training opportunities. We designed a regional induction programme, 'Building Excellence in Surgical Training' (BEST) to address this, develop essential technical and non-technical skills, and engender support networks. METHODS: All incoming London Core Surgical Trainees (annual cohort size 90) were invited to participate, during the week prior to commencement of training. Trainees undertook 3 modules (portfolio, surgical skills and human factors-based simulation) and a research paper presentation day. We collected qualitative and quantitative data through a structured evaluation form, pre and post course Likert-scale scores and self-assessment utilising the non-technical skills for surgeons (NOTSS) framework. RESULTS: 972 CSTs have completed BEST over the past 12 years. In 2019, significant improvements were seen in: confidence for starting CST, 45% (n = 22/49)-83% (n = 33/40,p = 0.00045); feeling the core programme cared about them, 55% (n = 27/49)-98% (n = 41/42, p =< 0.00001); getting to know peers 16% (n = 8/49)-88% (n = 35/40, p =< 0.00001); understanding human factors 82% (n = 40/49)-95% (n = 36/38, p = 0.00427); gaining confidence of trainers, 49% (n = 23/47)-86% (n = 31/36, p = 0.00114), and ability to speak out over patient safety concerns, 78% (n = 38/49)-97% (n = 37/38,p = 0.00019). NOTSS assessments showed significant improvement across all 4 criteria (n = 142, p =< 0.00001). CONCLUSION: BEST equips trainees with the fundamental skills and confidence to safely embark on surgical training and provides tools to navigate the challenges training presents. The ethos of collaboration and support will aid the development of more resilient and empowered surgeons, vital in this era.

Impact of an end-of-fourth-year emergency medicine bootcamp.

BACKGROUND: The final months of the fourth-year of medical school are variable in educational and clinical experience, and the effect on clinical knowledge and preparedness for residency is unclear. Specialty-specific "bootcamps" are a growing trend in medical education aimed at increasing clinical knowledge, procedural skills, and confidence prior to the start of residency. METHODS: We developed a 4-week Emergency Medicine (EM) bootcamp offered during the final month of medical school. At the conclusion of the course, participants evaluated its impact. EM residency-matched participants and non-participants were asked to self-evaluate their clinical knowledge, procedural skills and confidence 1 month into the start of residency. Program directors were surveyed to assess participants and non-participants across the same domains. A Fisher's exact test was performed to test whether responses between participants and non-participants were statistically different. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2018, 22 students participated in the bootcamp. The majority reported improved confidence, competence, and procedural skills upon completion of the course. Self-assessed confidence was significantly higher in EM-matched participants 1 month into residency compared to EM-matched non-participants (p = 0.009). Self-assessed clinical knowledge and procedural skill competency was higher in participants than non-participants but did not reach statistical significance. Program directors rated EM-matched participants higher in all domains but this difference was also not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in an EM bootcamp increases self-confidence at the start of residency among EM-matched residents. EM bootcamps and other specialty-specific courses at the end of medical school may ease the transition from student to clinician and may improve clinical knowledge and procedural skills.

Pivot and Persist: A Technical Report on Adapting an Existing Multi-Institutional Bootcamp to a Hybrid Platform.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted most in-person simulation training, including established simulation-based medical bootcamps. These sessions are important for the preparation of new trainees to think critically about common clinical scenarios, practice technical skills, and optimize leadership, teamwork, and communication. Having the opportunity to hone these skills in a safe environment is instrumental for the development of trainees' confidence and professional identity formation, and may contribute to patient safety. When the annual New England/Mid-Atlantic regional first-year neonatology fellows' bootcamp was jeopardized by COVID restrictions, we implemented a novel approach to adapt the existing in-person format and curriculum for large-scale hybrid delivery. The resultant two-day session was well-received by both participants and facilitators. Important lessons from this experience, including adaptions to the curriculum, schedule, simulation interface and hybrid platform, are relevant to educators seeking to conduct large-scale virtual simulation-based educational sessions.

A Targeted Needs Assessment for the Development of a Surgical Sub-internship Curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: Medical students often feel inadequately prepared for the responsibilities of surgical internship because of insufficient exposure to resident responsibilities prior to starting residency. This lack of preparation may contribute to burnout and attrition early in residency. Sub-internships should provide these experiences. Significant variation, however, exists in the structure of these rotations. We conducted a targeted needs assessment to inform the development of a didactic curriculum to address gaps in the surgical sub-internship experience and better prepare students for general surgery residency. DESIGN: A 25-item needs assessment survey was developed and distributed to senior medical students in their surgical sub-internship, current junior residents, and prior students (alumni) from the past 4 years who matched into general surgery residencies at other institutions. SETTING: Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth/Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, a tertiary-care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Nine senior medical students; 12 current residents and 14 alumni, including 9 PGY-1, 13 PGY-2, and 4 PGY-3 residents. RESULTS: The topics rated most important by medical students were floor management topics, specifically lines, tubes, and drains, hypotension, post-operative fever, chest pain, oliguria, and post-operative pain. In contrast, there was a wider variety of topics rated highly by residents. Residents emphasized non-technical communication and documentation skills. Residents at every training level rated presenting patients on rounds as the most important skill for incoming interns to acquire, whereas only one-third of medical students considered this to be an essential topic. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students rank management of common clinical problems as the most critical aspect in their preparation for residency. Residents recognized these topics as important, but also placed high emphasis on non-technical communication and documentation skills. The findings from this need's assessment can be used to guide content structure for a sub-intern curriculum.

Improving Health Professions Students' Understanding of Interprofessional Roles Through Participation in a Patient Stabilization Simulation.

Objective. To teach interprofessional communication and teamwork skills to health professions students through a standardized patient simulation on acute patient stabilization and measure the impact on learners' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration.Methods. Medical and pharmacy students in their final year and post-licensure nurses in their initial six-month probationary period worked together to stabilize a simulated acutely ill standardized patient. Perceptions of IPE were assessed pre- and post-simulation using the Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised Instrument, version 2 (SPICE-R2). Medical student participants' scores were compared to those of a concurrently enrolled cohort of medical students who did not participate in the simulation.Results. Eighty learners participated in the simulation and all completed pre and post SPICE-R2 assessments. Learners' perceptions increased significantly in all domains, including understanding of roles in collaborative practice, interprofessional teamwork and team-based practice, and patient outcomes from collaborative practice. Compared to the control cohort, participants' perceptions of team-based practice and the impact on patient outcomes improved significantly, while a statistically similar improvement in scores for understanding of roles and responsibilities was seen. The SPICE-R2 scores increased similarly among students in each profession. Repeat exposure to the simulation continued to improve perceptions but not as robustly as the initial simulation.Conclusion. This simulation changed learners' perceptions of how interprofessional collaboration affects patient care, which supports the incorporation of standardized patient-based interprofessional education even in the late-stage education of health professionals.

The Next Surgical Skills and Technology Elective Program: The "Surgical Skills and Technology Elective Program" Decreases Cognitive Load During Suturing Tasks in Second Year Medical Students.

OBJECTIVE: The Surgical Skills and Technology Elective Program (SSTEP) is a one-week, simulation-based procedural skills bootcamp for preclinical medical students. Using cognitive load (CL) as a useful framework for understanding simulation in medical education, our aims were to (1) examine the ability of SSTEP to decrease medical students' CL during procedural skills training and (2) determine the impact of SSTEP on secondary learning. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, twenty SSTEP participants and twenty controls were recruited. CL was assessed during a simple suturing task and a clinical vignette multitasking activity, where participants were required to suture and concurrently listen to a clinical vignette. CL was measured using the validated Subjective Rating of Mental Effort (SRME) and its impact on working memory was assessed using a knowledge test about the clinical vignette. RESULTS: Participants reported lower SRME scores while suturing following SSTEP, which persisted at 3 months (p = 0.002) and were significantly lower than controls (p = 0.031). Participants also reported lower SRME scores during the clinical vignette multitasking activity (p = 0.011), despite no improvement among controls (p = 0.63). Participants significantly outperformed controls on the clinical vignette knowledge test (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical skills training through SSTEP was associated with lower reports of mental effort and increased performance on secondary learning tasks. Procedural skills bootcamps may better prepare students for the complex learning environments encountered during clinical clerkship.

Maintaining Effective Senior Resident-Led Intern Education through Virtual Curricular Transition.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant shift to virtual resident education. While novel methods for virtual resident training have been described, many of these demonstrate a substantial change from previous instructional methods and their efficacy cannot be directly compared to in-person teaching. We sought to determine if the conversion of our intern "summer school" from an in-person to online format (a) impacted the knowledge acquisition of interns, and (b) their preferences for senior resident-led didactics. DESIGN: A senior-resident led intern summer curriculum was started in an in-person format with the 2019-2020 academic year. Interns underwent assessments of their knowledge and surveys of changes in subject confidence. After the COVID-19 pandemic, the curriculum was shifted to an online format for the academic year 2020-2021. SETTING: Washington University in St. Louis, an academic medical center located in St. Louis, Missouri PARTICIPANTS: PGY1 general surgery residents during academic year 2019-2020 (n = 13) and 2020-2021 (n = 14). RESULTS: In both years, interns demonstrated significant increases in confidence pre- and post-summer school in all domains (p <0.01). This was no different between the in-person and the virtual administration of the bootcamp (p 0.76). In both virtual and in-person curricula, interns demonstrated increased knowledge as measured by multiple choice, boards-style question quizzes. There were no significant differences between virtual and in-person formats. In both formats, interns reported a preference for senior residents as teachers (81% v. 77%) and increased comfort in asking questions in senior resident-led vs. attending-led didactics (91% v 100%). CONCLUSION: Virtual senior-resident led intern educational sessions are equally as effective as in-person sessions for knowledge acquisition and improving confidence in intern-specific domains. In both virtual and in-person settings, interns prefer senior resident teachers to attendings. Virtual senior resident-led education is an effective and simple method for intern instruction, regardless of the format/approach.

Otolaryngology Curriculum During Residency Preparation Course Improves Preparedness for Internship.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Residency preparation courses (RPCs) have become a widely adopted practice to ease the transition of medical students into residency, but these courses often lack training in skills expected of subspecialty interns. To fill this gap, a simulation-based curriculum in otolaryngology (ORL) was implemented at the University of Michigan Medical School. The curriculum aimed to improve confidence and perceived ability to perform common ORL skills for graduating students prior to internship. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Six basic simulations (tracheostomy, flexible laryngoscopy, otomicroscopy, myringotomy and tube insertion, epistaxis and peritonsillar abscess management) were included in the first course in 2019. The course was expanded in 2020 with the addition of three advanced simulations (ear foreign body extraction, tracheostomy complications, and "cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" situations). Pre- and postsession surveys were collected to assess individual simulations and the course overall. RESULTS: A total of 32 students participated in the ORL simulation curriculum in Spring 2019 and 2020. Paired t-tests showed significant improvement in self-perception of ability on every simulation. Qualitative feedback revealed that students particularly valued the opportunity for hands-on learning. Non-ORL students rated their baseline abilities significantly lower than ORL students on five stations, but they achieved statistically equivalent postsession ratings on all but the otomicroscopy station. CONCLUSIONS: An ORL-specific curriculum is a valuable addition to procedural RPCs. The curriculum resulted in increased confidence and perceived ability in skill performance for both students pursuing ORL residencies, as well as those pursuing other procedural specialties. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2143-E2148, 2021.

Program development of a preceptor bootcamp for operational pharmacy preceptors.

PURPOSE: To describe the development, design, and implementation of a pilot preceptor development bootcamp and feedback related to its feasibility and impact on operational pharmacy preceptors. SUMMARY: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center designed and implemented a pilot preceptor development bootcamp for operational staff pharmacists serving as residency preceptors for longitudinal weekend staffing experiences. A systematic, multipronged approach was taken to identify preceptor development gaps and design a full-day bootcamp curriculum. The resultant curriculum was comprised of content in major functional areas including using the 4 preceptor roles, documenting performance, giving and receiving feedback, and dealing with difficult situations or learners. The impact of the pilot preceptor development bootcamp was assessed using survey methodology and qualitative feedback from debrief discussions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a pilot preceptor bootcamp program addressing major areas of precepting skill was well received, resulted in positive feedback from operational pharmacy preceptors, and was feasible to implement at a large academic medical center.