Buttressing Sutures at the Center of the Mesh May Reduce the Probability of Recurrence in Onlay Incisional Hernia Repair: A Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: An incisional hernia is a common complication after abdominal surgery. Mesh fixation and fascial closure are crucial aspects of repairing incisional hernias. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of adding a buttressing suture in the center of the mesh in onlay incisional hernia repair on recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 157 patients who underwent elective repair of incisional hernia at Tokat State Hospital between January 2013 and January 2020. The study examined age, gender, comorbidity, smoking, hernia type, defect size, operative time, follow-up time, recurrence, and chronic pain. The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of buttressing suture used: normal and buttressing suture. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of a hernia at the site of a previous surgery. RESULTS: The study included 126 patients, with 61 (48.4%) in the control group and 55 (51.6%) in the buttressing suture group. Ten patients reported recurrence, with eight (13.1%) in the control group and two (3.1%) in the buttressing suture group. The difference in recurrence between the groups was statistically significant (p=0.038). The control group had an operative time of 58.79±13.23 minutes, while the buttressing suture group had an operative time of 62.12±13.51 minutes. The statistical analysis did not reveal any significant difference between the two groups (p=0.091). Out of the patients with chronic pain, two (33%) were in the control group and four (66%) were in the buttressing suture group. The incidence of chronic pain did not differ significantly between the two groups (p=0.52). CONCLUSION:  In incisional hernia repair, the use of buttressing sutures with mesh in incisional hernia repair resulted in decreased recurrence rates without increasing chronic pain or affecting operative time.

Novel approach of plate assisted buttressing in Hoffa fracture.

PURPOSE: Hoffa fracture is a femoral condyle fracture in the coronal plane. The lateral condyle is more commonly involved. The diagnosis is often difficult to detect with routine radiographs. Conservative management in this type of fracture resulted in nonunion, malunion, and other complications, such as stiff knee. Therefore, surgical management is mandatory in displaced fractures. Previous studies suggest only application of cancellous screw fixation, but these are not enough to counter vertical shear stress. Therefore, this study will evaluate the clinical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of Letenneur type I Hoffa fracture using cancellous screws with posterior buttressing plate. METHOD: This was a prospective cohort study conducted from March 2017 to July 2022 in orthopaedics department of tertiary care center after approval of institutional ethical committee. The study included 36 patients with Letenneur type I fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation using posterior buttress plate and cancellous screws. Radiographs and clinical outcomes, range of movement (ROM), bone union, and knee society score (KSS) of patients were assessed at the end of 4 and 12 months in the follow-ups. All statistical analysis was done using Epi info version 7.2.1.0. RESULTS: In the 36 patients with Letenneur type I fracture, the majority belong to younger age group between 25 and 54 years with 22 males and 14 females. The modes of injury were road traffic accidents in 25 patients and fall from height in 11 patients. The right knee was involved in 21 cases and left was involved in 15 cases. Lateral condyle involvement was seen in 27 cases and medial condyle in 9 cases. All 36 patients with Letenneur type I Hoffa fracture were evaluated 4 months after surgical intervention. The notable improvements were observed in terms of ROM 120.4° ± 5.0° and KSS 85.0 ± 4.2. At the 12-month follow-up, considerably better outcomes were maintained regarding ROM 128.1° ± 5.2° and KSS 89.3 ± 4.8 with p < 0.05 which was statistically significant. At the final follow-up, all patients had routine fracture healing with a union time of (3.2 ± 3.4) months. CONCLUSIONS: Fixation of Letenneur type I Hoffa fracture with cancellous screws and posterior buttress plate is effective, reliable and capable of providing adequate stability. Buttress plate assisted fixation is a valuable enhancement of the conventional technique of lag screw fixation of Hoffa fractures.

How Does Oversewing/Suturing (OS/S) Compare to Other Staple Line Reinforcement Methods? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Various staple line reinforcement (SLR) techniques in sleeve gastrectomy, including oversewing/suturing (OS/S), gluing, and buttressing, have emerged to mitigate postoperative complications such as bleeding and leaks. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has demonstrated OS/S as an efficacious strategy for preventing postoperative complications, encompassing leaks, bleeding, and reoperations. Given that OS/S is the sole SLR technique not incurring additional costs during surgery, our study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes associated with OS/S versus alternative SLR methods. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we reviewed the literature and conducted fifteen pairwise meta-analyses of comparative studies, each evaluating an outcome between OS/S and another SLR technique. Thirteen of these analyses showed no statistically significant differences, whereas two revealed notable distinctions.

"Buttressing Effect" in the Halogen-Lithium Exchange in ortho-Bromo-N,N-dimethylanilines and Related Naphthalenes.

Non-covalent interactions such as coordination of an organolithium reagent by a directing group and steric repulsion of substituents strongly affect the halogen-lithium exchange process. Here we present the manifestation of the "buttressing effect" - an indirect interaction between two substituents issued by the presence of a third group - and its influence on the ease and selectivity of the bromine-lithium exchange and the reactivity of formed aryllithiums. The increase of the size of the "buttressing" substituent strongly affects the conformation of a NMe2 group, forcing it to hinder ortho-bromine and thus slowing down the exchange. In naphthalene substrates bearing two bromines, this suppresses regioselectivity of the reaction. The "buttressing effect" forces formed aryllithiums to deaggregate, thus boosting their reactivity. This facilitates the decomposition via protolisys by ethereal solvents even at low temperatures and in some cases initiates fast Wurtz-Fittig coupling.

Outcomes of Staple Line Reinforcement Following Robotic Assisted Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on MBSAQIP Database.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes for Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR) in RA-SG based on the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database for 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected patients who underwent RA-SG in the MBSAQIP PUF (Public Utility File) for the year 2019 and grouped them based on their SLR status: Oversewing (OS), Buttressing (BR), both OS and BR and neither. Our primary outcomes were bleeding, organ space infection (OSI), and adverse events (AEs), and our secondary outcomes were operation length, hospital length of stay, readmissions, and conversion to open rates. We conducted separate chi square or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate and multivariable direct logistic regression models for the categorical outcomes. RESULTS: We found 115,621 patients with complete data of which there were 16,494 who underwent RA-SG. Our results did not show a statistically significant decrease in incidence of postoperative bleeding for BR and OS (Adjusted OR = 0.782, p = 0.2291 and Adjusted OR of 0.482, p = 0.054 for BR and OS respectively). There was a statistically significant effect for SLR status on operation length, with OS patients having the highest operative times (log-transformed mean = 2.03), followed by both BR + OS patients (log-transformed mean = 1.99). BR patients had the shortest operation length. CONCLUSION: SLR did not result in any significant differences related to bleeding, OSI or AEs following RA-SG according to MBSAQIP for the year 2019. However, OS resulted in significantly longer operative time compared to BR alone.

A new classification for quadrilateral plate fracture of acetabulum.

BACKGROUND: Recently, quadrilateral plate (QLP) fractures of acetabulum have attracted increasing attention. However, evidence for the appropriate classification of QLP fractures is still lacking, making it difficult to understand and manage these fractures. This study aimed to introduce a new classification for QLP fractures and evaluate its reproducibility. METHODS: A series of 1101 consecutive patients with acetabular fractures from 8 level-I trauma centers were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent preoperative radiograph and computed tomography imaging. QLP fractures were identified and classified using the new and Judet-Letournel classification system. The inter- and intra-observer reliabilities (kappa coefficients, κ) of these two systems were investigated by 4 observers. Furthermore, surgical approaches and fixation methods for each fracture type are described. RESULTS: In total, 243 (243/1101, 22%) patients with QLP fractures were identified and included in this analysis. The mean κ value of the intra-observer reliability was 0.84 (range, 0.763-0.919) for the new classification, indicating excellent agreement, and the inter-observer reliability was 0.762 (range, 0.625-0.876), indicating substantial agreement. The values were 0.649 (range, 0.523-0.708) and 0.584 (0.497-0.646), respectively, according to the Judet-Letournel classification. Six cases (6/243, 2.5%) could not be classified using the Judet-Letournel classification. The selection of surgical approaches and fixation methods depends on the fracture type; however, an anterior intra-pelvic approach and buttressing fixation using the plate or screw are preferred for QLP fractures. CONCLUSION: This study presents a new classification for QLP fractures, showing higher intra- and inter-observer reliabilities than those obtained using the Judet-Letournel classification. This allowed us to obtain an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of QLP fractures. Additionally, the new classification might guide further studies on surgical strategies for QLP fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Alveolar bone exostoses following orthodontic treatment. Diagnostic considerations and clinical management.

Alveolar bone exostoses (ABE) are benign localized convex outgrowths of buccal or lingual bone, which could be delineated from the surrounding cortical plate, also known as a buttress bone formation. Our review and case series demonstrate the development of alveolar bone exostoses during orthodontic therapy. It is crucial to keep in mind that every case presented had a history of palatal tori. In our clinical observations, higher precedence of ABE development was seen in participants during incisor retraction, especially with preexisting palatal tori. Additionally, we have successfully demonstrated surgical techniques to eliminate ABE in the event that self-remission does not occur once orthodontic forces are discontinued.

The technique of stump closure has no impact on post-pneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula in the non-small cell lung cancer-a cross-sectional study.

Background: Pneumonectomy is a high-risk radical resection procedure, with bronchopleural fistula (BPF) being its most challenging and severe complication. This study aimed to assess the surgical risk factors and the impact of the bronchial stump closure technique on the incidence of the BPF. Methods: This is a single-center, cross-sectional study of the medical records of 455 post-pneumonectomy patients operated due to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 2006-2017. We analyzed the following variables and their influence on the occurrence of the BPF: operation side, surgical techniques (i.e., manual suture or the stapler), stump buttressing, the extension of pneumonectomy, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Results: BPF occurred in 7.47% of post-pneumonectomy patients. BPF was more prevalent in right-sided pneumonectomy versus left-sided (10.98% vs. 5.32%; P=0.026). The use of a stapler or manual suture was not associated with the incidence of the BPF (7.96% vs.7.09%, P=0.72). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of BPF among bronchial stump buttressing with the parietal pleura (P=0.80), intercostal muscle flap (IMF) (P=0.46), and pericardial fat pad (P=0.88). When comparing data from 2006-2012 with those from 2013-2017, we found a steady decrease in the number of performed stump reinforcements, but this was not associated with a higher risk of BPF. Conclusions: The method used for stump closure, additional tissue buttressing of the bronchial stump and year of the surgery had no significant impact on the occurrence of BPF. Only right-sided pneumonectomy was associated with higher BPF occurrence.

Bioabsorbable Glycolide Copolymer is Effective in Reducing Staple Line Bleeding in Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative bleeding from the staple line after sleeve gastrectomy occurs in 2-8% of patients and it is associated with increased length and cost of hospitalization and may demand reoperation to gain hemostasis. Reinforced staplers are used by bariatric surgeons to reduce the incidence of postoperative leak but can have a role in avoiding bleeding. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of reinforcement on the whole gastric staple line during sleeve gastrectomy on postoperative bleeding. METHODS: Four hundred forty-eight consecutive patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy from November 2012 to April 2019 were divided into two groups. In the Top-only group only the top staple shot was realized with reinforced material (GORE® SEAMGUARD®) while in the Bottom-to-Top group, patients received full staple line reinforcement. Statistical analysis focused on postoperative leak and bleeding, and length of stay; a propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce between-group characteristics imbalance. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five (Top-only) and 303 (Bottom-to-Top) patients were included. Four (2.8%) patients in the Top-only group and none in the Bottom-to-Top group experienced severe bleeding (p = 0.004); the difference was still significant after propensity score matching. Length of stay was significantly shorter for the Bottom-to-Top group before and after propensity score matching (4 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Staple line buttressing reduces the incidence of severe postoperative bleeding when performed on the whole staple line, and it is associated with a shorter hospitalization.

Surgical Adjuncts During Esophagectomy.

Esophagectomy is a major operation whereby intraoperative technique and postoperative care must be optimal. Even in expert hands, the complication rate is as high as 59%. Here the authors discuss the role of surgical adjuncts, including enteral access, nasogastric decompression, pyloric drainage procedures, and anastomotic buttressing as adjuncts to esophagectomy and whether they reduce perioperative complications.

Metapodials of ancient bison (Bison priscus) of northeast Russia: "stress markers," sex and withers height.

A total of 175 metapodials (MP) of Pleistocene and early Holocene bison (Bison priscus Boj.) from the vast area of northeast Russia were studied. MP were attributed to males and females both visually and statistically. Data on the withers height of bison from northeast Russia are provided. Stress markers were recorded, including so-called "buttresses." With rare exceptions, stress markers were not of a pathological nature. The origin and development of the buttresses are age-related; their prevalence in bison females can be considered as the response to an increased load during pregnancy. Changes in the periosteum, found in males, are related to their greater activity. Buttresses are also well developed on metatarsals of the red deer and the elk; they are less developed in reindeer and not found in giant deer. A relationship among stress markers, locomotion and the environment is established. Possible peculiarities of the Rauchua River bison locomotion are discussed.

Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with staple line reinforcement with oversewing and staple line inversion vs buttressing material: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting are relevant complications after restrictive bariatric procedures, such as sleeve gastrectomy, mainly secondary to a drastic reduction in the gastric volume. However, other causes can be involved. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), with staple line reinforcement with oversewing vs buttressing material. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial of all the patients undergoing LSG was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients undergoing staple line inversion (Group 1) and patients undergoing staple line reinforcement with buttressing material (Group 2). Nausea and vomiting were assessed by the Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Intensity Scale. RESULTS: A total of 100 females were included in the study, 50 in each group. Mean operative time was 66.1 ±â€¯11.6 min in Group 1 and 55.4 ±â€¯9.4 in Group 2 (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in staple line leaks and bleeds between groups. The PONV intensity score at 6 h was 316.4 in Group 1 and 77.1 in Group 2 (p < 0.001). 24 h after surgery, the PONV intensity score was 86 in Group 1 and 7.9 in Group 2 (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The reinforcement with a running suture in LSG creates more PONV and increases the duration of the symptoms during the first hours after surgery, and prevents from early oral intake in a greater number of cases, when compared with the use of buttressing material as reinforcement method.

Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015-2016 PUF.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a dominant bariatric procedure. In the past, significant leak rates prompted the search for staple line reinforcement (SLR) techniques. Previous analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database for all LSG suggested a detrimental influence of SLR on leak rates and overall morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between various SLR techniques and bougie size with 30-day outcomes. SETTING: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program-accredited bariatric surgery hospitals. METHODS: Using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2015 to 2016 Participant Use File data, primary LSG cases were divided into study groups based on surgical techniques. All variables were reported in the Participant Use File except leak rate and overall morbidity, which had to be derived. Multiple bivariate analyses were used to analyze the 30-day outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 198,339 primary LSG operations were included and grouped into No SLR (23.0%), SLR (54.2%), oversewn staple line (9.5%), and a combination of SLR + oversewn staple line (13.3%). There were no statistical differences between study groups in mortality, overall morbidity, or leak rate. Bleeding and reoperation rates were statistically higher in the No SLR group. Bougie size was not associated with change in leak rates. CONCLUSION: Primary LSG is a safe procedure with low morbidity and mortality rates. SLR is associated with decreased rates of bleeding and reoperations but does not affect leak rates. The selection of SLR technique should be left to the surgeon's discretion with an understanding of the associated risks, benefits, and costs.

A Preventive Strategy for Staple Line Bleeding in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for staple line bleeding (SLB) during and after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are various, including patient related factors, perioperative medications, and surgical technique, although there is little clarification in the literature of the role played by blood pressure during the stapling phase. The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to identify possible risk factors liable to cause SLB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collected prospectively from 120 consecutive patients who underwent SG were analyzed retrospectively according to age, gender, body mass index (BMI), international normalized ratio (INR) value, intraoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP). RESULTS: In univariate analysis, age, stapling phase SBP and MABP, and the duration of surgery were all significantly higher in patients with SLB than those without (P < .05). In distinguishing patients with SLB from those without, the cutoff threshold for SBP during the stapling phase was 120 mmHg with a 78.9% sensitivity, 97.6% specificity, 93.8% positive predictive value, 90.9% negative predictive value, and 91.7% accuracy (AUC = 0.908, 95% CI: 0.839-0.976, and P < .001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, independent of age and operation time, SBP >120 mmHg significantly maintained its predictive power on SLB (95% CI: 32.410-1457.896, P < .001). CONCLUSION: A SBP >120 mmHg during the division of the stomach is an independent risk factor for SLB. Maintaining intraoperative SBP ≤120 mmHg during the stapling phase does not only decrease the risk of SLB but also the need for homeostatic agents such as clips and sutures, which in turn prolong the operative time and increase cost.

Evaluating the effect of operative technique on leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of operative technique on staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). BACKGROUND: Staple-line leaks after LSG are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Variations in operative technique exist; however, their effect on leaks is poorly understood. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (MBSC) to perform a case-control study comparing patients who had a clinically significant leak after undergoing a primary LSG to those who did not. A total of 45 patients with leaks were identified between January 2007 and December 2013. The leak group was matched 1:2 to a control group based on procedure type, age, body mass index, sex, and year the procedure was performed. Technique-specific factors were assessed by reviewing operative notes from all primary bariatric procedures in our study population. Conditional logistic regression was used to identify techniques associated with leaks. To increase the power of our analysis, we used a significance level of .10. RESULTS: Leak rates with LSG have decreased over the past 5 years (1.18% to .36%) as annual case volume has increased (846 cases/yr to 4435 cases/yr). Surgeons who performed 43 or more cases per year had a leak rate<1%. Leaks were more common among cases requiring a blood transfusion (26.2% versus 1.08%, P = .0031) and when cases were converted to open surgery (7.14% versus 0%, P = .0741). However, there was no significant difference in operative time between cases involving a leak and their matched controls (95.4 min versus 87.1 min, P = .1197). Oversewing of the staple line was the only technique associated with less leaks after controlling for confounding factors (OR .397 CI .174, .909, P = .0665). Notably, surgeons who oversewed routinely were also found to have higher case volume (307 versus 140, P = .0216) and less overall complication rates (4.81% versus 7.95%, P = .0027). Furthermore, oversewing technique varied widely as only 22.6% of cases involved oversewing of the entire staple line. CONCLUSION: Despite considerable variation in operative technique, leak rates with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy have decreased over time as operative volume has increased. Oversewing of the staple line was associated with fewer leaks, but specific suturing technique was not uniform and oversewing was performed routinely by more experienced surgeons with higher case volumes and less complication rates overall. Before standardizing surgical technique one must take into account variations in surgeon skill and experience.

What fosters concern for inequality among American adolescents?

Understanding cultural beliefs about social and economic inequality is vital to discerning the roadblocks and pathways to addressing that inequality. The foundation of concern for inequality is laid during adolescence, yet scholars understand little about the factors that influence whether and how adolescents come to express such concern. Arguing that structural and cultural contexts are just as consequential as whether adolescents themselves are members of disadvantaged groups, I draw on four theoretical perspectives to identify factors that influence adolescents' concern for addressing inequality: the underdog thesis, intergroup contact theory, the education enlightens thesis, and ideological buttressing. Using representative restricted-use Educational Longitudinal Survey data, I find that 12th-graders' beliefs are indeed influenced by more than their own demography: the diversity of their social milieu, the content of education in and out of the classroom, and ideological buttressing via political region and entertainment all influence whether they express concern for addressing inequality. These findings suggest extensions and amendments to the four theoretical perspectives and underscore the importance of studying structural and cultural factors that shape beliefs about inequality. The results also point to several interventions that may increase students' concern for inequality: involvement in civic-oriented extracurricular activities, more education in academic subjects that consider inequality, nurturing of cross-race friendships, and increased leisure reading.

Technique or technology? Evaluating leaks after gastric bypass.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between technique and surgical devices on anastomotic and staple-line leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. BACKGROUND: Leaks after bariatric surgery remain a major source of morbidity and mortality. The association of surgical technique and devices with leaks after gastric bypass is poorly understood. SETTING: Multi-centered study that included teaching and non-teaching hospitals that participate in a statewide consortium for quality improvement using a payer-funded outcome registry. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative and performed a case-control study comparing patients who sustained a leak with those who did not after primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A total of 71 (.44%) patients with leaks were identified between January 2007 and December 2011. The leak group was matched 1:2 to a control group (nonleak) based on procedure type, age, body mass index, sex, and the year in which the procedure was performed. Technique-specific case characteristics and device-specific factors were assessed by reviewing operative notes from all primary bariatric procedures in our study population. RESULTS: The rate of leak decreased during the study period, and there was a significant downward trend (slope estimate: -.19961%, P = .0372). After performing multivariate analysis, the type of anastomosis (circular stapler, hand-sewn, or linear stapler) and stapler manufacturer were not associated with leaks. The use of buttressing material was associated with a higher rate of leaks (odds ratio: 8.79 [95% confidence interval: 2.49-31.01], P = .0007), whereas the use of fibrin sealant was associated with a lower rate of leaks (odds ratio .11 [95% confidence interval: .03-.41], P = .0013). These findings could not be explained by differences in measures of surgeon performance. CONCLUSION: Leak rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass have fallen in Michigan despite variations in technique and device utilization. Although the type of anastomosis and stapler manufacturer do not appear to be significantly associated with leaks, it appears that the use of buttressing material was more common in cases in which leaks occurred, whereas the use of fibrin sealant was not. Given the complex interplay of multiple variables that affect surgical outcomes, future studies justifying the benefits of operative devices should be evaluated prospectively in the context of surgeon technique and skill.

Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Absorbable Staple Line Buttressing in Sleeve Gastrectomy in High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastric leaks and bleeding are the most important complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The use of absorbable membranes as staple line reinforcement may decrease this risk. On the other hand, these materials bring additional costs and their economic impact is not well known. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and economic performance of one of the commercially available buttressing absorbable materials when treating a high-risk population. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, and comparative study was conducted at Montpellier University Hospital, France, between July 2013 and September 2014. Patients undergoing LSG, who were at a high risk for leaks and bleeding, were included and treated according to two groups: no buttressing (July 2013 to January 2014) and buttressing (February 2014 to September 2014). Clinical and economic outcomes were measured throughout the first 6 months. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients were included in the study: 116 during the no stapling reinforcement period and 86 during the buttressing period. Baseline characteristics were similar. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding gastric leaks. However, buttressing reduced hemorrhagic complications (0 vs 8.6 %, p = 0.005) and decreased average total hospital costs for the first hospitalization (5768 vs 6025 €, p < 0.001), as well as 6-month total inpatient cost (5944 vs. 6246 €, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Staple line reinforcement with absorbable material reduces bleeding in high-risk population. Therefore, this type of material can also result in cost-savings.

Fixation of acetabular fractures via the ilioinguinal versus pararectus approach: a direct comparison.

This study compared the quality of reduction and complication rate when using a standard ilioinguinal approach and the new pararectus approach when treating acetabular fractures surgically. All acetabular fractures that underwent fixation using either approach between February 2005 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and the demographics of the patients, the surgical details and complications were recorded. A total of 100 patients (69 men, 31 women; mean age 57 years, 18 to 93) who were consecutively treated were included for analysis. The quality of reduction was assessed using standardised measurement of the gaps and steps in the articular surface on pre- and post-operative CT-scans. There were no significant differences in the demographics of the patients, the surgical details or the complications between the two approaches. A significantly better reduction of the gap, however, was achieved with the pararectus approach (axial: p = 0.025, coronal: p = 0.013, sagittal: p = 0.001). These data suggest that the pararectus approach is at least equal to, or in the case of reduction of the articular gap, superior to the ilioinguinal approach. This approach allows direct buttressing of the dome of the acetabulum and the quadrilateral plate, which is particularly favourable in geriatric fracture patterns.

Staple Line Reinforcement Methods in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Comparison of Burst Pressures and Leaks.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a technically simple and popular bariatric operation with acceptable results. However, leaks can occur in long staple lines, for which various reinforcement methods are used. We compared nonreinforced stapling in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with 3 staple line reinforcement methods: suturing, absorbable buttressing material, and fibrin glue. METHODS: From March 1 until September 30, 2014, 118 patients with body mass index >40 kg/m(2) underwent sleeve gastrectomy and were enrolled in 4 groups, depending on the type of reinforcement used. The resected stomach specimens were treated with the same methods of reinforcement as used in the surgeries in the corresponding patients and then insufflated until a burst occurred. The burst pressures of the resected stomach specimens and adverse postoperative events were recorded. RESULTS: Five postoperative leaks occurred in the reinforcement groups (fibrin glue, 2; absorbable buttresses, 2; sutures, 1); no leaks were evident in the no-reinforcement group. Suturing afforded the highest burst pressure and took the longest to perform of the methods. There was no correlation between the leaks and burst pressures. All of the leaks occurred in the proximal fundus in the resected stomach specimens and in the affected patients. DISCUSSION: Although most surgeons use additional reinforcement on long staple lines in sleeve gastrectomy, there is no consensus about its necessity. We did not show any benefit of such reinforcement methods over proper stapling technique alone. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy without staple line reinforcement is safe and avoids additional costs for reinforcement materials.