Age affects the diagnostic accuracy of the cancer ratio for malignant pleural effusion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cancer ratio (CR), which is defined as serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) ratio, has been reported to be a useful diagnostic marker for malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Whether its diagnostic accuracy is affected by age remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of age on the diagnostic accuracy of CR. METHODS: The participants in this study were from a prospective cohort (SIMPLE cohort, n = 199) and a retrospective cohort (BUFF cohort, n = 158). All participants were patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion (PE). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CR. The effect of age on the diagnostic accuracy of CR was investigated by adjusting the upper limit of age for participant enrolment. RESULTS: Eighty-eight MPE patients were verified in the SIMPLE cohort, and thirty-five MPE patients were verified in the BUFF cohort. The AUCs of CR in the SIMPLE and BUFF cohorts were 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52-0.68) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.71), respectively. In both cohorts, the AUCs of CR decreased with the advancement of age. CONCLUSION: Age can affect the diagnostic accuracy of CR for MPE. CR has limited diagnostic value in older patients. KEY MESSAGE: Cancer ratio is a promising diagnostic marker for malignant pleural effusion. This study revealed that its diagnostic accuracy decreased in older patients. Its diagnostic accuracy is overestimated by previous studies using tuberculosis and pneumonia patients as controls.

Diagnostic value of periostin in lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion.

BACKGROUND: Periostin (POSTN) is an extracellular matrix protein that is overexpressed in lung cancer and is considered an effective diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of POSTN and to further evaluate the diagnostic value of POSTN combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer ratio [CR: serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/pleural effusion adenosine deaminase (PE ADA)] in lung cancer-related malignant PE (MPE). METHODS: A total of 108 patients with PE, including 54 with lung cancer and 54 with benign lung disease, were enrolled in this study. The POSTN levels of PE and serum were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Information on the expression of PE and serum CEA, serum LDH, and PE ADA was collected from medical records. RESULTS: The levels of PE POSTN in MPE of patients with lung cancer were significantly higher than those in patients with benign PE (p < 0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of PE POSTN for lung cancer-related MPE were respectively 77.78% and 68.52% when the cutoff value was determined to be 53.45 ng/ml. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PE POSTN has a high diagnostic value in MPE associated with lung cancer [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.764], and the combination of PE POSTN, PE CEA, and CR can improve the diagnostic accuracy of lung cancer-related MPE (AUC = 0.948). CONCLUSION: POSTN can be used as a potential marker for lung cancer-related MPE diagnosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of the cancer ratio for the prediction of malignant pleural effusion: evidence from a validation study and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of serum LDH to pleural ADA ratio (cancer ratio, CR)for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) through an original study and meta-analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 145 patients with MPE and 117 cases of benign pleural effusions (BPE). The diagnostic performance of CR and a typical biomarker of MPE, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), were analysed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) as a measure of accuracy. The overall diagnostic accuracy of CR was summarised by a standard diagnostic meta-analysis. RESULTS: Significantly higher CR and pleural CEA values were observed in the MPE patients than in the BPE patients. At a cut-off value of 14.97, CR showed high sensitivity (0.91), low specificity (0.67), and high AUC (0.85). The combination of CEA and CR increased the AUC to 0.98. The meta-analysis included seven studies involving 2,078 patients. The pooled values for sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of CR were 0.96, 0.88, 7.70, 0.05, and 169, respectively. The AUC of the summary ROC of CR was 0.98. CONCLUSION: CR has a high diagnostic accuracy for predicting MPE, especially when used in combination with pleural CEA.

Value of Cancer Ratio plus and Cancer Ratio Formulation in Distinguishing Malignant Pleural Effusion from Tuberculosis and Parapneumonic Effusion.

Background: The aim of our study is to determine the clinical availability accessibility of cancer ratio and cancer ratio plus formulations, previously validated and reported to have clinical value in distinguishing malignant pleural effusion from tuberculosis pleurisy and parapneumonic effusion. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients hospitalized with Malignant Pleural Effusion (MPE), tuberculosis (TPE) and pararapneumonic effusion (PPE) between 2009 and 2018. Results: Totally 232 patients, 101(43.5 %) having MPE, 86 (37.1 %) having PPE and 45 (19.4 %) TPE were examined. When compared with each other, "serum LDH / PS Lymphocyte %", "Cancer ratio" and "Cancer ratio plus" values were statistically different between the groups (p = 0.021, p <0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, cancer ratio, serum LDH: pleural fluid lymphocyte count ratio was in positive correlation with MPE. The sensitivity and specificity of "cancer ratio", "cancer ratio plus" and "ratio of serum LDH: pleural fluid lymphocyte count" were 84.2 % (95% CI 75.6- 90.7) and 52.7 (95% CI 43.8- 61.5), and 82.2 % (95% CI 73.3- 89.1) and 45.8 (95%CI 37.1- 54.7), 53.5% (95% CI 43.3- 63.5) and 67.2% (95% CI 0.68-0.94) at the cut-off level of >14.25, >28.7, and >636, respectively. When considering only MPE and TPE patients, the specificity of cancer ratio and cancer ratio plus increased. Conclusion: The cancer ratio plus rate (the ratio of "cancer ratio"formulation to the percentage of differential pleural lymphocyte count) was almost the same as the cancer ratio in separating the malignant pleural effusion from the TPE and PPE, while it has better specificity only in differentiating malignant effusions from tuberculosis effusions.

Role of cancer ratio and other new parameters in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

OBJECTIVES: We compared the diagnostic potential of cancer ratio (CR, serum lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]/pleural fluid adenosine deaminase [pfADA]), cancer ratio plus (CR plus, cancer ratio/pleural lymphocyte percentage), and age/pfADA ratio with pfADA in malignant pleural effusion. METHODS: Data from 100 patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and 119 patients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) were retrospectively collected. PfADA, age/pfADA ratio, CR, and CR plus were compared between patients with MPE and those with TPE in two age groups (≤50 and >50 years). The best cut-off value was determined, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated according to the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: PfADA was statistically significantly lower while age/pfADA ratio, CR, and CR plus were significantly higher in the MPE group than in the TPE group in both age groups (p<0.05). For patients aged ≤50 years, the differential diagnostic value of pfADA for MPE was better than those of age/pfADA ratio, CR, and CR plus. At a cut-off value of 13.0 U/L, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.9%, 100.0%, and 98.9%, respectively. For patients aged >50 years, the diagnostic performance of CR plus was superior to those of pfADA, age/pfADA ratio, and CR. At a cut-off value of 22.6, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CR plus for the diagnosis of MPE were 86.8%, 84.6%, and 86.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The best parameter for diagnosing MPE was different for patients aged ≤50 years and >50 years. For patients aged >50 years, CR plus was a good parameter for the differential diagnosis of MPE. For patients aged ≤50 years, pfADA was better.

Diagnostic accuracy of cancer ratio for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to pleural fluid adenosine deaminase ratio (cancer ratio, CR) for malignant pleural effusion (MPE), but the results were various. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of CR for MPE. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to 7 June, 2019 to identify publications concerning diagnostic accuracy of CR for MPE. The sensitivities and specificities of CR in included studies were pooled with a bivariate model. A summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was used to estimate the global diagnostic accuracy of CR. Quality of the included studies was assessed with the revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). RESULTS: Finally, five studies with 596 MPE patients and 863 benign pleural effusion (BPE) patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CR were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92-0.99) and 0.89 (0.69-0.97), respectively. The area under sROC curve was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99). The major design weaknesses of the included studies were patients selection and partial verification bias. CONCLUSIONS: CR has high diagnostic accuracy for MPE. Considering the design weaknesses of available studies, further studies with rigorous design are needed to further validate the findings of this meta-analysis.