RESUMEN
To investigate the carcinogenicity of anatase-type nano-titanium dioxide (aNTiO2), F344/DuCrlCrlj rats were exposed to aNTiO2 aerosol at concentrations of 0, 0.5, 2, and 8 mg/m3. The rats were divided into 2 groups: carcinogenicity study groups were exposed for two years, and satellite study groups were exposed for one year followed by recovery for 1 day, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks after the end of exposure. In the carcinogenicity groups, bronchiolo-alveolar carcinomas were observed in two 8 mg/m3-exposed males, showing an increasing trend by Peto's test. However, this incidence was at the upper limit of JBRC's historical control data. Bronchiolo-alveolar adenomas were observed in 1, 2, 3, and 4 rats of the 0, 0.5, 2, and 8 mg/m3-exposed females and were not statistically significant. However, the incidence in the 8 mg/m3-exposed females exceeded JBRC's historical control data. Therefore, we conclude there is equivocal evidence for the carcinogenicity of aNTiO2 in rats. No lung tumors were observed in the satellite groups. Particle-induced non-neoplastic lesions (alveolar epithelial hyperplasia and focal fibrosis) were observed in exposed males and females in both the carcinogenicity and satellite groups. Increased lung weight and neutrophils of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were observed in the 8 mg/m3-exposed carcinogenicity groups. The aNTiO2 deposited in the lungs of the satellite group rats was decreased at 26 weeks after the end of exposure compared to 1 day after the end of exposure. At 52 weeks after the end of exposure, the decreased level was the same at 26 weeks after the end of exposure.
Asunto(s)
Exposición por Inhalación , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Ratas Endogámicas F344 , Titanio , Animales , Titanio/toxicidad , Titanio/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Femenino , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Aerosoles , Pulmón/patología , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Nanopartículas/toxicidad , RatasRESUMEN
N-nitrosamines and nitrosamine drug substance related impurities (NDSRIs) became a critical topic for the development and safety of small molecule medicines following the withdrawal of various pharmaceutical products from the market. To assess the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of different N-nitrosamines lacking robust carcinogenicity data, several approaches are in use including the published carcinogenic potency categorization approach (CPCA), the Enhanced Ames Test (EAT), in vivo mutagenicity studies as well as read-across to analogue molecules with robust carcinogenicity data. We employ quantum chemical calculations as a pivotal tool providing insights into the likelihood of reactive ion formation and subsequent DNA alkylation for a selection of molecules including e.g., carcinogenic N-nitrosopiperazine (NPZ), N-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP), together with N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) as well as non-carcinogenic N-nitrosomethyl-tert-butylamine (NTBA) and bis (butan-2-yl) (nitros)amine (BBNA). In addition, a series of nitroso-methylaminopyridines is compared side-by-side. We draw comparisons between calculated reaction profiles for structures representing motifs common to NDSRIs and those of confirmed carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic molecules with in vivo data from cancer bioassays. Furthermore, our approach enables insights into reactivity and relative stability of intermediate species that can be formed upon activation of several nitrosamines. Most notably, we reveal consistent differences between the free energy profiles of carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic molecules. For the former, the intermediate diazonium ions mostly react, kinetically controlled, to the more stable DNA adducts and less to the water adducts via transition-states of similar heights. Non-carcinogenic molecules yield stable carbocations as intermediates that, thermodynamically controlled, more likely form the statistically preferred water adducts. In conclusion, our data confirm that quantum chemical calculations can contribute to a weight of evidence approach for the risk assessment of nitrosamines.
RESUMEN
The potential carcinogenicity of talc has been evaluated in many studies in humans and experimental animals published in the scientific literature over the last several decades, with a number of these studies reporting no associations between talc exposure and any type of cancer. In order to fully understand the current state of the science regarding the potential for talc to induce human cancers, we conducted a comprehensive and systematic review of the available experimental animal and mechanistic evidence (in conjunction with a systematic review of the epidemiology evidence in a companion analysis) to evaluate whether it supports talc as being carcinogenic to humans. We considered study quality and its impact on the interpretation of results and evaluated all types of cancer and all exposure routes. We also evaluated the evidence on the potential for talc to migrate in the body to potential tumor sites. We identified seven experimental animal carcinogenicity studies and 11 mechanistic studies of talc to systematically review. We found that several of the experimental animal carcinogenicity studies of talc have limitations that preclude their sensitivity to detect increases in tumor incidence. Regardless, the studies cover multiple exposure routes, species, and exposure durations, and none indicate that talc is a carcinogen in experimental animals except in rats under conditions of extremely high exposure that likely resulted in lung particle overload, a nonspecific effect of high exposures to poorly soluble particles, and not from any carcinogenic properties of talc. Lung particle overload leading to lung tumor formation has only been observed in rats and not in any other species, including humans. The mechanistic studies indicate that talc is not genotoxic or mutagenic, but can induce some effects that could be events on a possible pathway to carcinogenicity, mainly at high exposures or in in vitro studies with exposures of unclear relevance in vivo, but these effects are not consistent across studies and cell types. This systematic review of the experimental animal carcinogenicity and mechanistic evidence for talc indicates that an association between talc exposure and cancer is not expected in humans. Talc carcinogenicity is not plausible in any species except rats, and only when the exposure conditions are high enough to induce lung particle overload, which is not relevant to human exposures.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Talco , Talco/toxicidad , Animales , Humanos , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Pruebas de CarcinogenicidadRESUMEN
We report a histiocytic sarcoma originating from the epididymis observed in a 110-week-old male CD-1 mouse in a carcinogenicity study. At necropsy, no lesions were observed in the epididymis. Histologically, a neoplastic lesion was observed in the cauda of the epididymis that was well demarcated from the surrounding tissues. The lesion mainly consisted of spindle-shaped tumor cells with oval to elongated nuclei and abundant eosinophilic or foamy cytoplasm. The tumor cells were arranged in a fascicular pattern, interlacing bundles, or a whorl pattern. The nuclei showed mild atypia with irregular shapes and varied sizes, whereas few mitotic figures and no typical multinucleated cells were observed. The epididymal ducts remained within the neoplastic lesion, and the tumor cells invaded between the epithelium and the smooth muscle layer of the epididymal duct. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for vimentin and macrophage markers (Iba1, CD204, F4/80, and Mac-2) but negative for cytokeratin and other mesenchymal cell (α-smooth muscle actin, desmin, CD31, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-ß), neural cell (S-100 and nestin), or Leydig cell markers (calretinin). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive tumor cells were sporadically observed in the lesion. Based on these results, the tumor was diagnosed as a histiocytic sarcoma originating from the epididymis. This report provides additional histopathological evidence of spontaneous histiocytic sarcomas originating from the epididymis of aged mice.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Aspartame, invented in 1965 by GD-Searle, is an intense artificial sweetener taste approximately 200 times as sweet as sucrose and used as an additive in more than 6,000 products. Aspartame (APM) was submitted for pre-marketing safety evaluation in early 1980. The studies, performed by GD-Searle, produced controversial results. AREAS COVERED: Because of the great commercial diffusion of aspartame, in 1997 the Ramazzini Institute (RI) started a large experimental project on rodents to test the carcinogenic effects of aspartame following an experimental model with more sensitive characteristics, namely a large number of rat and mice, starting treatment from prenatal life, observation until spontaneous death. Overall, the project included studying 2270 rats and 852 mice. These studies have shown that aspartame is a carcinogenic agent in experimental animals, inducing a significant dose-related increased incidence of several types of malignant tumors and, among them, hematological neoplasia, and liver cancer. EXPERT OPINION: The results of these studies on aspartame by the Ramazzini Institute opened a real front on the evaluation of artificial sweeteners and their possible health risks. Adequate long-term carcinogenicity bioassays on other diffuse artificial sweeteners such as acesulfame-k, sucralose, saccharin, including their blends, are likewise important for public health.
Asunto(s)
Aspartame , Carcinógenos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Neoplasias , Edulcorantes , Aspartame/efectos adversos , Aspartame/administración & dosificación , Animales , Edulcorantes/efectos adversos , Edulcorantes/administración & dosificación , Edulcorantes/farmacología , Ratones , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/patología , Ratas , Humanos , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Carcinógenos/administración & dosificación , Pruebas de CarcinogenicidadRESUMEN
Nonclinical safety studies are typically conducted to establish a toxicity profile of a new pharmaceutical in clinical development. Such a profile may encompass multiple differing types of animal studies, or not! Some types of animal studies may not be warranted for a specific program or may only require a limited evaluation if scientifically justified. The goal of this course was to provide a practical perspective on regulatory writing of a dossier(s) using the weight of evidence (WOE) approach for carcinogenicity, drug abuse liability and pediatric safety assessments. These assessments are typically done after some clinical data are available and are highly bespoke to the pharmaceutical being developed. This manuscript will discuss key data elements to consider and strategy options with some case studies and examples. Additionally, US FDA experience with dossier(s) including WOE arguments is discussed.
RESUMEN
The finding of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in marketed drugs has led to implementation of risk assessment processes intended to limit exposures to the entire class of N-nitrosamines. A critical component of the risk assessment process is establishing exposure limits that are protective of human health. One approach to establishing exposure limits for novel N-nitrosamines is to conduct an in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation study. Existing regulatory guidance on N-nitrosamines provides decision making criteria based on interpreting in vivo TGR mutation studies as an overall positive or negative. However, point of departure metrics, such as benchmark dose (BMD), can be used to define potency and provide an opportunity to establish relevant exposure limits. This can be achieved through relative potency comparison of novel N-nitrosamines with model N-nitrosamines possessing robust in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. The current work adds to the dataset of model N-nitrosamines by providing in vivo TGR mutation data for N-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). In vivo TGR mutation data was also generated for a novel N-nitrosamine impurity identified in sitagliptin-containing products, 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine (NTTP). Using the relative potency comparison approach, we have demonstrated the safety of NTTP exposures at or above levels of 1500 ng/day.
RESUMEN
The rodent cancer bioassays are conducted for agrochemical safety assessment yet they often do not inform regulatory decision-making. As part of a collaborative effort, the Rethinking Carcinogenicity Assessment for Agrochemicals Project (ReCAAP) developed a reporting framework to guide a weight of evidence (WOE)-based carcinogenicity assessment that demonstrates how to fulfill the regulatory requirements for chronic risk estimation without the need to conduct lifetime rodent bioassays. The framework is the result of a multi-stakeholder collaboration that worked through an iterative process of writing case studies (in the form of waivers), technical peer reviews of waivers, and an incorporation of key learnings back into the framework to be tested in subsequent case study development. The example waivers used to develop the framework were written retrospectively for registered agrochemical active substances for which the necessary data and information could be obtained through risk assessment documents or data evaluation records from the US EPA. This exercise was critical to the development of a framework, but it lacked authenticity in that the stakeholders reviewing the waiver already knew the outcome of the rodent cancer bioassay(s). Syngenta expanded the evaluation of the ReCAAP reporting framework by writing waivers for three prospective case studies for new active substances where the data packages had not yet been submitted for registration. The prospective waivers followed the established framework considering ADME, potential exposure, subchronic toxicity, genotoxicity, immunosuppression, hormone perturbation, mode of action (MOA), and all relevant information available for read-across using a WOE assessment. The point of departure was estimated from the available data, excluding the cancer bioassay results, with a proposed use for the chronic dietary risk assessment. The read-across assessments compared data from reliable registered chemical analogues to strengthen the prediction of chronic toxicity and/or tumorigenic potential. The prospective case studies represent a range of scenarios, from a new molecule in a well-established chemical class with a known MOA to a molecule with a new pesticidal MOA (pMOA) and limited read-across to related molecules. This effort represents an important step in establishing criteria for a WOE-based carcinogenicity assessment without the rodent cancer bioassay(s) while ensuring a health protective chronic dietary risk assessment.
RESUMEN
Industry representatives on the ICH S1B(R1) Expert Working Group (EWG) worked closely with colleagues from the Drug Regulatory Authorities to develop an addendum to the ICH S1B guideline on carcinogenicity studies that allows for a weight-of-evidence (WoE) carcinogenicity assessment in some cases, rather than conducting a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study. A subgroup of the EWG composed of regulators have published in this issue a detailed analysis of the Prospective Evaluation Study (PES) conducted under the auspices of the ICH S1B(R1) EWG. Based on the experience gained through the Prospective Evaluation Study (PES) process, industry members of the EWG have prepared the following commentary to aid sponsors in assessing the standard WoE factors, considering how novel investigative approaches may be used to support a WoE assessment, and preparing appropriate documentation of the WoE assessment for presentation to regulatory authorities. The commentary also reviews some of the implementation challenges sponsors must consider in developing a carcinogenicity assessment strategy. Finally, case examples drawn from previously marketed products are provided as a supplement to this commentary to provide additional examples of how WoE criteria may be applied. The information and opinions expressed in this commentary are aimed at increasing the quality of WoE assessments to ensure the successful implementation of this approach.
RESUMEN
Lorcaserin is a 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C (serotonin) receptor agonist and a non-genotoxic rat carcinogen, which induced mammary tumors in male and female rats in a two-year bioassay. Female Sprague Dawley rats were treated by gavage daily with 0, 30, or 100 mg/kg lorcaserin, replicating bioassay dosing but for shorter duration, 12 or 24 weeks. To characterize exposure and eliminate possible confounding by a potentially genotoxic degradation product, lorcaserin and N-nitroso-lorcaserin were quantified in dosing solutions, terminal plasma, mammary and liver samples using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. N-nitroso-lorcaserin was not detected, supporting lorcaserin classification as non-genotoxic carcinogen. Mammary DNA samples (n = 6/dose/timepoint) were used to synthesize PCR products from gene segments encompassing hotspot cancer driver mutations (CDMs), namely regions of Apc, Braf, Egfr, Hras, Kras, Nfe2l2, Pik3ca, Setbp1, Stk11, and Tp53. Mutant fractions (MFs) in the amplicons were quantified by CarcSeq, an error corrected next-generation sequencing approach. Considering all recovered mutants, no significant differences between lorcaserin dose groups were observed. However, significant dose-responsive increases in Pik3ca H1047R mutation were observed at both timepoints (ANOVA, p < 0.05), with greater numbers of mutants and mutants with greater MFs observed at 24 weeks as compared to 12 weeks. These observations suggest lorcaserin promotes outgrowth of spontaneously occurring Pik3ca H1047R mutant clones leading to mammary carcinogenesis. Importantly, this work reports approaches to analyze clonal expansion and demonstrates CarcSeq detection of the carcinogenic impact (selective Pik3ca H0147R mutant expansion) of a non-genotoxic carcinogen using a treatment duration as short as 3 months.
RESUMEN
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a rat renal carcinogen that induces karyomegaly and micronuclei in proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs). We previously performed comprehensive gene profiling of alterations in promoter-region methylation and gene expression in PTECs of rats treated with OTA for 13 weeks. The OTA-specific gene profile was obtained by excluding genes showing expression changes similar to those upon treatment with 3-chloro-1,2-propanediol, a renal carcinogen not inducing karyomegaly. In this study, we validated the candidate genes using methylated DNA enrichment PCR and real-time RT-PCR, and identified Gen1, Anxa3, Cdkn1a, and Osm as genes showing OTA-specific epigenetic changes. These genes and related molecules were subjected to gene expression and immunohistochemical analyses in the PTECs of rats treated with OTA, other renal carcinogens, or non-carcinogenic renal toxicants for 4 or 13 weeks. Cdkn1a upregulation and increase of p21WAF1/CIP1+ karyomegalic PTECs were observed with OTA, matching the findings associated with micronucleus-inducing carcinogens. This suggested that the increase of p21WAF1/CIP1+ karyomegalic PTECs is linked to micronucleus formation, which in turn accelerates chromosomal instability. The upregulation of Cdkn1a-related genes with OTA suggests the acquisition of a senescence-associated secretory phenotype, which promotes the establishment of a carcinogenic environment. Meanwhile, OTA specifically caused a decrease of GEN1+ PTECs reflecting Gen1 downregulation and an increase of ANXA3+ PTECs reflecting Anxa3 upregulation, as well as Osm upregulation. OTA may efficiently disrupt pathways for repairing the DNA double-strand breaks that it itself causes, via Gen1 downregulation, and enhance cell proliferation through the upregulation of Anxa3 and Osm. This may exacerbate the chromosomal instability from the early stage of OTA-induced renal carcinogenesis before proliferative lesions form. OTA may cause renal carcinogenesis involving multiple epigenetic mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Epigénesis Genética , Ocratoxinas , Venenos , Ocratoxinas/toxicidad , Riñón , Metilación de ADN , Neoplasias Renales/inducido químicamente , Fallo Renal Crónico/inducido químicamente , Animales , Ratas , Masculino , Ratas Endogámicas F344 , Carcinógenos Ambientales/toxicidad , Regulación de la Expresión GénicaRESUMEN
Plasticizers are necessary for the usability of various products, including food contact materials. Exposure to plasticizers is most commonly made through the oral route. Several plasticizers have been reported to have adverse effects on humans and the environment. Thus, the present study aimed to determine the long-term toxicity and carcinogenicity of a novel plasticizer called bis(2-ethylhexyl) cyclohexane-1,4-dicarboxylate (Eco-DEHCH), which is an ecofriendly and biologically less harmful replacer. Groups of 50 male and 50 female Han Wistar rats were fed Eco-DEHCH at daily doses of 1,600, 5,000, or 16,000 ppm in their diet for at least 104 weeks. The rats were regularly monitored for mortality, clinical signs, body weight, food consumption, food efficiency, and perceivable mass. All animals were subjected to complete necropsy and histopathological examination. The results indicate that the rats well tolerated chronic exposure to Eco-DEHCH at highest daily doses of 16,000 ppm, with was equivalent to 805.1 mg/kg/day in males and 1060.6 mg/kg/day in females and did not show signs of toxicity or carcinogenicity. In conclusion, Eco-DEHCH could be a safe and promising alternative plasticizer.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad , Plastificantes , Ratas Wistar , Animales , Plastificantes/toxicidad , Masculino , Femenino , Ratas , Administración Oral , Ácidos Dicarboxílicos/toxicidad , Ácidos Dicarboxílicos/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Ciclohexanos/toxicidad , Ciclohexanos/administración & dosificación , DietaRESUMEN
A modular strategy is described for the testing and assessment (MoSt) of non-genotoxic carcinogenicity (NGTxC) that is suitable for regulatory applications. It utilizes and builds upon work conducted by the OECD expert group on NGTxC. The approach integrates relevant test methods from the molecular- to cellular- and further to tissue level, many of which have been recently reviewed. Six progressive modules are included in the strategy. Advice is provided for the iterative selection of the next appropriate test method within each step of the strategy. Assessment is completed by a weight of evidence conclusion, which integrates the different streams of modular information. The assessment method gives higher weight to findings that are mechanistically linked with biological relevance to carcinogenesis. With a focus on EU-REACH, and pending upon successful test method validation and acceptance, this will also enable the MoSt for NGTxC to be applied for regulatory purposes across different regulatory jurisdictions.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad , Carcinógenos , Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad/métodos , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Animales , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo/métodosRESUMEN
A retrospective analysis in C57BL6/J mice used in dietary carcinogenicity studies was performed to determine the survival rate, causes of death and incidences of spontaneous non-tumoral and tumoral findings. Data were collected from 1600 mice from control dose groups of sixteen 18-month carcinogenicity assays performed between 2003 and 2021 at the same test facility with similar environmental conditions and experimental procedures. The survival rate was high in both sexes (81%-85%) and the causes of humane euthanasia or death were mainly non-tumoral (chronic ulcerative dermatitis, atrial thrombosis). Benign tumors were more frequent than malignant tumors and females were more affected than males. Pituitary gland adenoma in females, lymphoma, bronchioloalveolar adenoma, and harderian gland adenoma in both sexes were the most common tumors. Systemic amyloidosis, the most frequent non-tumoral lesion, was observed variably across studies without sex predilection. The analysis by cohort (3 time periods of 6 years) showed a tendency toward higher incidences of lymphoma and pituitary gland adenoma and lower incidences of amyloidosis over time. The results presented here provide for the first time a robust set of control historical data in untreated C57BL/6J mice kept for 18 months contributing to build in depth knowledge of this animal model.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Animales , Femenino , Masculino , Ratones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , DietaRESUMEN
The development of a rapid and accurate model for determining the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of chemicals is crucial for effective cancer risk assessment. This study aims to develop a 1-day, single-dose model for identifying genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (GHCs) in rats. Microarray gene expression data from the livers of rats administered a single dose of 58 compounds, including 5 GHCs, was obtained from the Open TG-GATEs database and used for the identification of marker genes and the construction of a predictive classifier to identify GHCs in rats. We identified 10 gene markers commonly responsive to all 5 GHCs and used them to construct a support vector machine-based predictive classifier. In the silico validation using the expression data of the Open TG-GATEs database indicates that this classifier distinguishes GHCs from other compounds with high accuracy. To further assess the model's effectiveness and reliability, we conducted multi-institutional 1-day single oral administration studies on rats. These studies examined 64 compounds, including 23 GHCs, with gene expression data of the marker genes obtained via quantitative PCR 24 h after a single oral administration. Our results demonstrate that qPCR analysis is an effective alternative to microarray analysis. The GHC predictive model showed high accuracy and reliability, achieving a sensitivity of 91% (21/23) and a specificity of 93% (38/41) across multiple validation studies in three institutions. In conclusion, the present 1-day single oral administration model proves to be a reliable and highly sensitive tool for identifying GHCs and is anticipated to be a valuable tool in identifying and screening potential GHCs.
Asunto(s)
Máquina de Vectores de Soporte , Animales , Masculino , Ratas , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/metabolismo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Administración Oral , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad/métodos , Mutágenos/toxicidad , Medición de Riesgo/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This review explores the transformative impact of machine learning (ML) on carcinogenicity prediction within drug development. It discusses the historical context and recent advancements, emphasizing the significance of ML methodologies in overcoming challenges related to data interpretation, ethical considerations, and regulatory acceptance. AREAS COVERED: The review comprehensively examines the integration of ML, deep learning, and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in various aspects of drug development safety assessments. It explores applications ranging from early-phase compound screening to clinical trial optimization, highlighting the versatility of ML in enhancing predictive accuracy and efficiency. EXPERT OPINION: Through the analysis of traditional approaches such as in vivo rodent bioassays and in vitro assays, the review underscores the limitations and resource intensity associated with these methods. It provides expert insights into how ML offers innovative solutions to address these challenges, revolutionizing safety assessments in drug development.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad , Carcinógenos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Aprendizaje Automático , Humanos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/métodos , Animales , Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad/métodos , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Aprendizaje ProfundoRESUMEN
The presence of N-nitroso compounds, particularly N-nitrosamines, in pharmaceutical products has raised global safety concerns due to their significant genotoxic and mutagenic effects. This systematic review investigates their toxicity in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), drug products, and pharmaceutical excipients, along with novel analytical strategies for detection, root cause analysis, reformulation strategies, and regulatory guidelines for nitrosamines. This review emphasizes the molecular toxicity of N-nitroso compounds, focusing on genotoxic, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and other physiological effects. Additionally, it addresses the ongoing nitrosamine crisis, the development of nitrosamine-free products, and the importance of sensitive detection methods and precise risk evaluation. This comprehensive overview will aid molecular biologists, analytical scientists, formulation scientists in research and development sector, and researchers involved in management of nitrosamine-induced toxicity and promoting safer pharmaceutical products.
RESUMEN
Isoeugenol is one of several phenylpropenoid compounds that is used as a fragrance, food flavoring agent and in aquaculture as a fish anesthetic. Carcinogenicity testing in rats and mice by NTP resulted in clear evidence of carcinogenicity (hepatic adenomas/carcinomas) in male mice only. A nongenotoxic threshold mode of action (MOA) is postulated for isoeugenol and is discussed considering the IPCS MOA and Human Relevance Framework. The weight of evidence indicates that isoeugenol is not genotoxic and that the carcinogenic outcome in male mice relates directly to the metabolism of individual compounds. Benchmark Dose (BMD) modeling was conducted to determine a Point of Departure (POD) and potential threshold of carcinogenicity. The results of the BMD evaluation for isoeugenol resulted in an estimated POD for carcinogenicity in the male mouse of 8 mg/kg with a lower limit of 4 mg/kg, representing a POD for the determination of an acceptable daily intake. With application of uncertainty factors, an ADI of 40 µg/kg is calculated. This daily dose in humans would be protective of human health, including carcinogenicity. A corresponding maximum residual level (MRL) of 3200 µg/kg fish is also estimated based on this POD that considers the threshold MOA.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Eugenol , Animales , Eugenol/análogos & derivados , Eugenol/toxicidad , Masculino , Humanos , Ratones , Ratas , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Medición de Riesgo , Femenino , Aromatizantes/toxicidadRESUMEN
Environmental exposures are the main cause of cancer, and their carcinogenicity has not been fully evaluated, identifying potential carcinogens that have not been evaluated is critical for safety. This study is the first to propose a weight of evidence (WoE) approach based on computational methods to prioritize potential carcinogens. Computational methods such as read across, structural alert, (Quantitative) structure-activity relationship and chemical-disease association were evaluated and integrated. Four different WoE approach was evaluated, compared to the best single method, the WoE-1 approach gained 0.21 and 0.39 improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) value, respectively. The evaluation of 681 environmental exposures beyond IARC list 1-2B prioritized 52 chemicals of high carcinogenic concern, of which 21 compounds were known carcinogens or suspected carcinogens, and eight compounds were identified as potential carcinogens for the first time. This study illustrated that the WoE approach can effectively complement different computational methods, and can be used to prioritize chemicals of carcinogenic concern.
Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Humanos , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Relación Estructura-Actividad Cuantitativa , Medición de Riesgo , AnimalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: De novo malignancy is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Cumulative immunosuppression has been shown to contribute to post-transplant malignancy (PTM) risk. There is emerging evidence on the differential carcinogenic risk profile of individual immunosuppressive drugs, independent of the net effect of immunosuppression. Calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus may promote tumourigenesis, whereas mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil, may limit tumour progression. Liver transplantation (LT) is relatively unique among solid organ transplantation in that immunosuppression monotherapy with either tacrolimus or MPA is often achievable, which makes careful consideration of the risk-benefit profile of these immunosuppression agents particularly relevant for this cohort. However, there is limited clinical data on this subject in both LT and other solid organ transplant recipients. AIM: To investigate the relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus and MPA in solid organ transplantation. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase databases using the key terms "solid organ transplantation", "tacrolimus", "mycophenolic acid", and "carcinogenicity", in order to identify relevant articles published in English between 1st January 2002 to 11th August 2022. Related terms, synonyms and explosion of MeSH terms, Boolean operators and truncations were also utilised in the search. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed to identify any additional articles. Excluding duplicates, abstracts from 1230 records were screened by a single reviewer, whereby 31 records were reviewed in detail. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies were included in this review. All studies were large population registries or cohort studies, which varied in transplant era, type of organ transplanted and immunosuppression protocol used. Overall, there was no clear difference demonstrated between tacrolimus and MPA in de novo PTM risk following solid organ transplantation. Furthermore, no study provided a direct comparison of carcinogenic risk between tacrolimus and MPA monotherapy in solid organ transplantation recipients. CONCLUSION: The contrasting carcinogenic risk profiles of tacrolimus and MPA demonstrated in previous experimental studies, and its application in solid organ transplantation, is yet to be confirmed in clinical studies. Thus, the optimal choice of immunosuppression drug to use as maintenance monotherapy in LT recipients is not supported by a strong evidence base and remains unclear.