Breaking with trends in forensic dating: A likelihood ratio-based comparison approach.

Further steps toward understanding the time-related information contained within bloodstains found at the crime scene are rightly considered a top priority in forensic science. Contrary to widely held assumptions, the reason for the delayed exploitation of bloodstains dating methods in practice is not the lack of suitable analytical techniques for monitoring degradation processes. The problem lies in the variability of the environmental and circumstantial conditions, playing a vital role in the degradation kinetics of blood deposits. The present article demonstrates the possibility of breaking with current approaches based on absolute age estimations to finally answer time-centered questions in real forensic scenarios. The proposed novel framework for situating forensic traces in time is based on the likelihood ratio assessment of the (dis)similarity between the evidence decomposition and sets of reference materials obtained through supervised aging. In such a strategy, every dating procedure is constructed on a case-by-case basis to fit examined blood traces, thereby limiting the adverse influence of external factors on the validity of age estimations and providing a way for future crime scene implementation.

Voxel-based analysis in radiation oncology: A methodological cookbook.

Recently, 2D or 3D methods for dose distribution analysis have been proposed as evolutions of the Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) approaches. Those methods, collectively referred to as pixel- or voxel-based (VB) methods, evaluate local dose response patterns and go beyond the organ-based philosophy of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modelling. VB methods have been introduced in the context of radiation oncology in the very last years following the virtuous example of neuroimaging experience. In radiation oncology setting, dose mapping is a suitable scheme to compare spatial patterns of local dose distributions between patients who develop toxicity and who do not. In this critical review, we present the methods that include spatial dose distribution information for evaluating different toxicity endpoints after radiation therapy. The review addresses two main topics. First, the critical aspects in dose map building, namely the spatial normalization of the dose distributions from different patients. Then, the issues related to the actual dose map comparison, i.e. the viable options for a robust VB statistical analysis and the potential pitfalls related to the adopted solutions. To elucidate the different theoretical and technical issues, the covered topics are illustrated in relation to practical applications found in the existing literature. We conclude the overview on the VB philosophy in radiation oncology by introducing new phenomenological approaches to NTCP modelling that accounts for inhomogeneous organ radiosensitivity.

Investigation of various factors influencing Raman spectra interpretation with the use of likelihood ratio approach.

The main aim of this study was to verify whether selected analytical parameters may affect solving the comparison problem of Raman spectra with the use of the likelihood ratio (LR) approach. Firstly the LR methodologies developed for Raman spectra of blue automotive paints obtained with the use of 785nm laser source (results published by the authors previously) were implemented for good quality spectra recorded for these paints with the use of 514.5nm laser source. For LR models construction two types of variables were used i.e. areas under selected pigments bands and coefficients derived from discrete wavelet transform procedure (DWT). Few experiments were designed for 785nm and 514.5nm Raman spectra databases after constructing well performing LR models (low rates of false positive and false negative answers and acceptable results of empirical cross entropy approach). In order to verify whether objective magnification described by its numerical aperture affects spectra interpretation, three objective magnifications -20×(N.A.=0.4.), 50×(N.A.=0.75) and 100×(N.A.=0.85) within each of the applied laser sources (514.5nm and 785nm) were tested for a group of blue solid and metallic automotive paints having the same sets of pigments depending on the applied laser source. The findings obtained by two types of LR models indicate the importance of this parameter for solving the comparison problem of both solid and metallic automotive paints regardless of the laser source used for measuring Raman signal. Hence, the same objective magnification, preferably 50× (established based on the analysis of within- and between-samples variability and F-factor value), should be used when focusing the laser on samples during Raman measurements. Then the influence of parameters (laser power and time of irradiation) of one of the recommended fluorescence suppression techniques, namely photobleaching, was under investigation. Analysis performed on a group of solid automotive paint samples showed that time of irradiation upon established laser power does not affect solving the comparison problem with the use of LR test. Likewise upon established time of irradiation 5% or 10% laser power could be used interchangeably without changing conclusions within this problem. However, upon the established time of irradiation changes in laser power between control and recovered sample from 5% or 10% to 50% may cause erroneous conclusions. Additionally it was also proved that prolonged irradiation of paint does not quantitatively affect pigments bands areas revealed after such a pre-treatment.

Secure multiparty computation of a comparison problem.

Private comparison is fundamental to secure multiparty computation. In this study, we propose novel protocols to privately determine [Formula: see text], or [Formula: see text] in one execution. First, a 0-1-vector encoding method is introduced to encode a number into a vector, and the Goldwasser-Micali encryption scheme is used to compare integers privately. Then, we propose a protocol by using a geometric method to compare rational numbers privately, and the protocol is information-theoretical secure. Using the simulation paradigm, we prove the privacy-preserving property of our protocols in the semi-honest model. The complexity analysis shows that our protocols are more efficient than previous solutions.

Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies.

Many psychologists do not realize that exploratory use of the popular multiway analysis of variance harbors a multiple-comparison problem. In the case of two factors, three separate null hypotheses are subject to test (i.e., two main effects and one interaction). Consequently, the probability of at least one Type I error (if all null hypotheses are true) is 14 % rather than 5 %, if the three tests are independent. We explain the multiple-comparison problem and demonstrate that researchers almost never correct for it. To mitigate the problem, we describe four remedies: the omnibus F test, control of the familywise error rate, control of the false discovery rate, and preregistration of the hypotheses.

Intervals for the assessment of measurement agreement: Similarities, differences, and consequences of incorrect interpretations.

Several intervals have been proposed to quantify the agreement of two methods intended to measure the same quantity in the situation where only one measurement per method and subject is available. The limits of agreement are probably the most well-known among these intervals, which are all based on the differences between the two measurement methods. The different meanings of the intervals are not always properly recognized in applications. However, at least for small-to-moderate sample sizes, the differences will be substantial. This is illustrated both using the width of the intervals and on probabilistic scales related to the definitions of the intervals. In particular, for small-to-moderate sample sizes, it is shown that limits of agreement and prediction intervals should not be used to make statements about the distribution of the differences between the two measurement methods or about a plausible range for all future differences. Care should therefore be taken to ensure the correct choice of the interval for the intended interpretation.