Secondary Immunodeficiency and Vaccine Response in Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis on Immunosuppressive Medicines.

Background Rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients have dysregulated immune system parameters that may increase infection risk at baseline. In addition, treatment of these conditions with immunosuppressive medications may lead to the development of secondary immunodeficiency (SID). Our objective was to assess SID in a cohort on immunosuppressive medications. We hypothesized that SID is clinically detectable by assessing immune parameters and polysaccharide and protein-based vaccination responses. Methodology A prospective cohort study of 42 subjects on immunosuppressive medications was assessed. Analysis included immunoglobulin levels, lymphocyte subsets, and two-step response to diphtheria, tetanus, and 23-valent Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccinations. Exclusions included primary immunodeficiency, malignancy, pregnancy, neutropenia, immunoglobulin replacement, prior B-cell-depleting medication or chemotherapy, use of non-immunosuppressive medication, or recent use of glucocorticoids. Suboptimal vaccine response was defined as an abnormal response based on standard criteria for each vaccine. Results Low IgM levels (below 50 mg/dL) occurred in seven (17%) subjects and IgG (below 650 mg/dL) in three (7%) subjects. Impaired lymphocyte subsets were uncommon. In total, 33 (78%) subjects completed the two-step vaccination assessment. Overall, 29 of 33 (88%) subjects demonstrated suboptimal response to pneumococcal vaccination, 10 (30%) demonstrated suboptimal response to diphtheria, and four (12%) to tetanus. Two (6%) subjects demonstrated suboptimal response to all vaccinations. Finally, 31 (94%) subjects demonstrated suboptimal response to at least one vaccination. Conclusions SID may develop, is clinically detectable, and most notably demonstrated in suboptimal responses to polysaccharide vaccinations, especially against S. pneumoniae.

The determinants associated with the prescription of a first biologic therapy in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and concomitant fibromyalgia are mostly objective and in line with the recommendations. Results of a cross-sectional survey-based study using a mixed (qualitative and quantitative) approach to help rheumatologists in their daily practice.

OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus on the therapeutic strategy of rheumatologists for patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and concomitant fibromyalgia (FM).The main aim of this study was to identify, in a population of rheumatologists practicing in Normandy, France, the determinants associated with their decision to prescribe a first biologic DMARD (bDMARD) in patients with Spa/FM. Specific objectives were to evaluate professional prescribing practices to identify a set of criteria likely to contribute to the therapeutic decision of rheumatologists, and to validate the relevance of these criteria. METHOD: This is a cross-sectional survey-based study using a mixed (qualitative and quantitative) method. The quantitative approach was web-based and conducted among rheumatologists in Normandy. RESULTS: The qualitative study allowed us to identify a set of criteria likely to contribute to the therapeutic decision of rheumatologists. In the quantitative study, 54/113 rheumatologists filled the questionnaire. Four criteria were considered by all respondents to contribute to their decision to prescribe a first bDMARD: arthritis on physical examination, extra-articular manifestations, systemic inflammation and structural damage on imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The determinants associated with the decision of rheumatologists to prescribe a first bDMARD in patients with SpA/FM were mostly objective, in line with the recommendations in the literature. Most criteria were more related to an approach aimed at ensuring the diagnosis of SpA than evaluating its activity or severity.

Safety of biologic immunosuppressants in pregnant women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) typically affect women of childbearing age. One of the challenges in treating these women during pregnancy is to manage the disease while minimizing or avoiding the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that may increase the risk to the mother or fetus. Biologic therapy has transformed the management of these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the maternal-fetal safety and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with IMID exposed to biologic DMARDs either preconceptionally or during pregnancy and compare them with women using conventional DMARDs and a group of healthy pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with prospective follow-up of pregnant women with IMID at a single center. We analyzed baseline maternal demographic characteristics, diseases, DMARDs, and maternal-fetal outcomes. RESULTS: A cohort of 244 pregnancies was studied. One hundred twenty-eight patients met classificatory criteria for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and 116 pregnancies of healthy women were evaluated from the same study period. One hundred and one pregnancies in IMID patients (89.84 %) occurred under immunosuppressive treatment, 78.91 % of IMID pregnancies were under cDMARD (33.59 % exclusive cDMARD), 56.25 % under bDMARD, and 27.34 % under oral glucocorticoids. Anti-TNF was the most frequent (88.88 %) bDMARD and was used in 50.78 % of the IMIDs. There was at least one flare in 37.10 % of the IMID pregnancies, and 9.38 % experienced more than one. Among flares, 43.48 % happened in the first trimester, 34.78 % in the second trimester, and 19.57 % in the third. Flares were more frequent in the RMD patients compared with IBD (p = 0.041; OR 2.15, 95%CI: 1.03-4.52). Flare was associated with discontinuation of bDMARD before the eighth week of gestation (p = 0.016), but especially in the second (p = 0.042) and third trimester (p = 0.012). Maternal infections were an infrequent complication overall (7.66 %), although more frequent in patients with IMIDs (p = 0.004) but were not associated with cDMARD or bDMARD. IMID patients needed assisted reproductive techniques (ART) more often (p = 0.001, OR 2.83, 95%CI: 1.02-7.90). More cesarean sections were performed in gestations under treatment with bDMARD (p = 0.020) and especially in those under treatment with anti-TNF. Aneuploidies calculation risk and fetal malformations were not correlated with DMARDs (cDMARDs, bDMARDs, or its combination) nor with any of the DMARDs individually preconcepcionally or during gestation. Small for gestational age (SGA) newborns were higher in patients with IMIDs however, it was not associated with DMARD use. DISCUSSION: In general, patients with IMIDs who require treatment with bDMARDs have a more severe or refractory disease prior to gestation. In our cohort, we found a higher risk of flare among patients with bDMARDs, especially when those were suspended early. Among maternal outcomes, we found that IMID patients needed ART more often. This is probably, first of all, because of maternal age. Among fetal outcomes, there are no differences in congenital malformations in the IMIDs and healthy patients and were not correlated with DMARDs. CONCLUSION: The use of bDMARDs was effective in disease control and safe from a maternal-fetal point of view, with no increase in prematurity, SGA, malformations, or infections.

The prognostic value of IgA anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and rheumatoid factor in an early arthritis population with a treat-to-target approach.

The mucosal origin hypothesis of rheumatoid arthritis has renewed the interest in IgA autoantibodies, but their added value over IgG anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and IgM rheumatoid factor (RF) for modern treatment outcomes remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of IgA-ACPA and IgA-RF for treatment outcomes in an early arthritis population. IgA-ACPA/RF isotypes were measured in baseline sera from 480 inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients, who were included in the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort trial (tREACH). The tREACH trial was a multicentre, stratified, single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach. The prognostic value of IgA-ACPA/RF was determined by evaluating differences in (1) quick-attained (< 6 months after diagnosis) and persistent remission rates, (2) DMARD-free remission and (3) biological use between IA patients with and without IgA-ACPA/RF over 3 years of follow-up. IgA-ACPA was present in 23% of patients and overlapped with IgG-ACPA positivity in 94%. Similarly, IgA-RF overlapped with IgM-RF in 90% of patients. IgA-ACPA positivity was associated with lower DFR rates and more biological use, but this effect was largely mediated by the presence of IgG-ACPA, since this effect disappeared after stratification for IgG-ACPA (HR 0.6, 95%CI 0.2-1.6 for DFR). No differences were observed in 'quick-attained and persistent remission' rates and for IgA-RF. Their seems to be no additional value of IgA-ACPA and IgA-RF for modern, long-term clinical outcomes. The effects of IgA-ACPA seen in our study are largely mediated by the presence of IgG-ACPA. Based on these results, there is no rationale for measuring these isotypes in daily practice.

Leflunomide-Associated Wound Complication After Cochlear Implantation: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation has become an increasingly common strategy for aural rehabilitation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss who no longer benefit from conventional amplification. In conjunction, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become the keystone of management in numerous autoimmune conditions. Given the increasing prevalence of both, a greater proportion of patients will undergo cochlear implantation while on immune-modulating medications. While these medications are usually well tolerated, immunosuppression may put patients a higher risk for device infections. At present, this is not extensively studied within the cochlear implant literature. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review and review of the literature.Results:We present the case of an 81-year-old male who experienced wound dehiscence and infection secondary to leflunomide use for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Resolution of these issues was noted with a therapeutic drug holiday, and the patient has subsequently undergone re-implantation without issue.Conclusions:The case highlights a potential CI-associated wound complication in the setting of DMARD therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of both CIs and immunosuppressive therapy, future study on the potential for interaction is warranted to identify the best management strategy in the perioperative setting.

The prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope.

This guideline will provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations on the safe use of non-biologic DMARDs, also called conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD), across the full spectrum of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The guideline will update the guideline published in 2017 and will be expanded to include people of all ages. Updated information on the monitoring of DMARDs and vaccinations will be included. The guideline will be developed using the methods and processes described in the British Society for Rheumatology's 'Creating clinical guidelines: our protocol', updated 2023.

Targeting cytokines in psoriatic arthritis.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is part of the psoriatic disease spectrum and is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process that affects entheses, tendons and joints. Cytokines produced by immune and non-immune cells play a central role in the pathogenesis of PsA by orchestrating key aspects of the inflammatory response. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL-23 and IL-17 have been shown to regulate the initiation and progression of PsA, ultimately leading to the destruction of the architecture of the local tissues such as soft tissue, cartilage and bone. The important role of cytokines in PsA has been underscored by the clinical success of antibodies that neutralize their function. In addition to biologic agents targeting individual pro-inflammatory cytokines, signaling inhibitors that block multiple cytokines simultaneously such as JAK inhibitors have been approved for PsA therapy. In this review, we will focus on our current understanding of the role of cytokines in the disease process of PsA and discuss potential new treatment options based on modulation of cytokine function.

Upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy and safety through 5 years in the SELECT-EARLY randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy over 5 years among MTX-naïve patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-EARLY trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg or MTX. Patients who did not achieve CDAI remission and had < 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts at week 26 received rescue therapy (addition of MTX in the upadacitinib group and addition of upadacitinib in the MTX group). Efficacy assessments were evaluated over 5 years and are reported as observed (AO) for patients who received continuous monotherapy with upadacitinib 15/30 mg or MTX and by randomized group applying non-responder imputation (NRI). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) per 100 patient-years were summarized over 5 years. RESULTS: Of 945 patients randomized and treated, 775 (82%) completed week 48 and entered the LTE on study drug. Higher proportions of patients consistently achieved disease activity targets over 5 years with upadacitinib than MTX. In AO analyses, 53%/59% of patients attained CDAI remission with upadacitinib 15/30 mg versus 43% with MTX at week 260. NRI analyses showed better CDAI, DAS28(CRP), and ACR responses with upadacitinib relative to MTX at week 260 (all comparisons, nominal P < .001). Upadacitinib treatment also resulted in numerically greater inhibition of structural joint progression through week 260 compared to MTX. Most TEAEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were numerically higher in patients receiving upadacitinib 30 mg. Rates of serious infections, herpes zoster, creatine phosphokinase elevation, nonmelanoma skin cancer, and neutropenia were numerically higher with upadacitinib than MTX. The observed safety profile of upadacitinib over 5 years was consistent with earlier trial results and integrated phase 3 safety analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib showed better clinical responses versus MTX in patients with RA throughout the 5-year trial. Higher rates of several AEs were observed with upadacitinib, especially in the 30 mg group, compared to MTX. When used as monotherapy in MTX-naïve patients, the approved upadacitinib 15 mg dose showed better long-term efficacy versus MTX and an overall favorable benefit-risk profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02706873.

Paradoxical Eczematous Reaction in a Patient With IL-17 Inhibitor-Treated Psoriasis Vulgaris.

Psoriasis is a chronic dermatologic condition that oftentimes requires extensive trial and error with various topical and systemic therapies until improvement is achieved. Interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), such as secukinumab, have been utilized in the treatment of psoriasis due to their mechanism of action. As with all medications, IL-17 inhibitors possess adverse effects, the most common being infection, nasopharyngitis, and injection site reaction. However, one rare adverse event, the paradoxical eczematous reaction, has been known to occur among patients on biologics including IL-17 inhibitors. Although it is a rare occurrence, our paper stresses the importance of educating patients about this potential side effect, the benefits and risks of starting a biologic, and obtaining informed consent from the patient. We present a case of a 14-year-old male with recalcitrant psoriasis vulgaris who developed a paradoxical eczematous reaction while undergoing treatment with secukinumab.

Transverse Myelitis: An Adverse Reaction to Abatacept.

Immunotherapies are powerful disease-modifying agents in treating autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, their unique mechanisms of action confer a broad spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which tend to be rare but complex, with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. We report a case of transverse myelitis in a patient with RA whose joint disease had been well-controlled with long-term intravenous abatacept. Suspicion of an unusual irAE in this elderly patient, whose neurologic symptomatology was gradual and protracted, prompted the discontinuation of abatacept and the rapid initiation of corticosteroid therapy. These interventions yielded a favorable clinical outcome for the patient. We must draw clinicians' attention to this rare but potentially consequential adverse drug reaction.

Trust performance in managing inflammatory arthritis over time in England and Wales: a latent class analysis approach.

Objectives: To evaluate trust-level performance in time to initiation of DMARD therapy in patients with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA), with identification of the change in performance trajectories over time and investigation of trust characteristics associated with this change. Methods: We included 130 trusts from the UK contributing to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) from 2018 to 2020. The primary outcome was days from referral to initiation of DMARD therapy in patients with EIA. Latent class growth mixture models were applied to identify distinct groups of trusts with similar trajectories of performance change over time. We used mixed effects linear and multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate the association between delay in treatment and trust-level characteristics. Results: The mean time to DMARD initiation was 53 days (s.d. 18), with an average 0.3-day decrease with each month over time. Four latent trajectories were identified in our cohort, with >77% of individual trusts showing ongoing improvements in decreasing treatment waiting times. Prior to separating by latent class, time to DMARD initiation was shorter in trusts with higher rheumatology staffing, a local EIA treatment pathway and those with access to musculoskeletal ultrasound. Trusts with more nurses in the rheumatology department were less likely to be in the worst performance group [odds ratio 0.69 (95% CI 0.49, 0.93)]. Conclusion: In this cohort study, we observed a reduction in treatment waiting time over time. Trusts with better staffed and improved EIA clinical structure are likely to initiate definitive treatment earlier in patients with EIA.

Clinical Pharmacology in Sarcoidosis: How to Use and Monitor Sarcoidosis Medications.

When sarcoidosis needs treatment, pharmacotherapy is usually required. Although glucocorticoids work reliably and relatively quickly for sarcoidosis, these drugs are associated with numerous significant side effects. Such side effects are common in sarcoidosis patients, as the disease frequently has a chronic course and glucocorticoid treatment courses are often prolonged. For these reasons, corticosteroid-sparing and corticosteroid-replacing therapies are often required for sarcoidosis. Unfortunately, many healthcare providers who care for sarcoidosis patients are not familiar with the use of these agents. In this manuscript, we provide a review of the pharmacotherapy of sarcoidosis. We discuss the mechanism of action, dosing, side-effect profile, approach to monitoring and patient counselling concerning glucocorticoids, and the common alternative drugs recommended for use in the recent European Respiratory Society (Lausanne, Switzerland) Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines. We also discuss the use of these agents in special situations including hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, pregnancy, breastfeeding, vaccination, and drug-drug interactions. It is hoped that this manuscript will provide valuable practical guidance to clinicians who care for sarcoidosis patients.

Characteristics and 6-Month Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Infliximab Biosimilar IFX-dyyb in a Real-World Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world studies describing biosimilar initiation or switching in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are limited. The aim of this study was to assess treatment patterns and effectiveness of real-world patients with RA initiating infliximab biosimilar IFX-dyyb (CT-P13; Inflectra®) in the USA. METHODS: This observational study evaluated patients with RA from the CorEvitas RA Registry who initiated IFX-dyyb and had Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) recorded at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was reaching low disease activity (LDA; CDAI ≤ 10) at 6 months in patients with moderate or high disease activity (CDAI > 10) at baseline. Secondary outcomes were change at 6 months in CDAI and certain patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patient data were stratified by prior treatment: biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARD)-naïve, reference infliximab (IFX-REF) or IFX biosimilar, or a non-IFX biologic or tsDMARD. RESULTS: Of 318 patients initiating IFX-dyyb, 176 had baseline and 6-month CDAI scores; 73 (41%) switched from IFX, 61 (35%) switched from another non-IFX/biologic/tsDMARD, 32 (18%) were naïve to biologics/tsDMARDs, and 10 (6%) switched from an IFX biosimilar. Among patients with moderate or high disease activity at baseline, 32.9% (95% CI 22.9, 42.9) achieved LDA at 6 months. Mean 6-month change from baseline in CDAI was - 1.8 (95% CI - 3.3, - 0.3) overall; - 4.7 (- 7.6, - 1.7) in patients who switched from a non-IFX biologic/tsDMARD, - 4.1 (- 7.8, - 0.3) in biologic/tsDMARD-naïve patients, and 1.1 (- 0.4, 2.6) in patients who switched from IFX-REF/IFX biosimilar. Other clinical outcomes/PROs improved at 6 months. Of the IFX-dyyb initiators, 68% remained on IFX-dyyb at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In this real-world population of patients with RA initiating IFX-dyyb, the majority switched from IFX-REF or a non-IFX biologic/tsDMARD. CDAI remained stable in patients switching from IFX-REF/IFX biosimilar and improved in patients switching from a non-IFX biologic/tsDMARD and in biologic/tsDMARD-naïve patients.

Infliximab is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Biosimilars­biologic drugs designed to be very similar to the originator products­are now available that may be more affordable with matching efficacy and safety. IFX-dyyb is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved infliximab biosimilar but little is known about its use in real-world clinical practice in patients with RA in the USA. This study used data from a large observational registry to look at treatment patterns and effectiveness of IFX-dyyb in adults with RA. One hundred and seventy-six patients were included who had data available at both baseline and at 6 months. Most patients (47%) switched to IFX-dyyb from the originator infliximab or another infliximab biosimilar; 35% switched from another RA treatment, and 18% were new to treatment. Six months after starting IFX-dyyb, 68% of patients were still receiving treatment. A measure of clinical disease activity remained stable in patients who switched from originator infliximab or another biosimilar, while this measure improved in patients switching to IFX-dyyb from other treatments or starting treatment for the first time. Other clinical measures and patient-reported outcomes such as pain and fatigue also improved over 6 months with IFX-dyyb. This real-world study of patients with RA initiating IFX-dyyb in the USA adds to our knowledge of the use of biosimilars in this patient population.

Managing Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) for Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery: A Pilot Survey.

Introduction: Patients affected by autoimmune pathologies such as rheumatoid arthritis require surgery for various reasons. However, the systemic inflammatory nature of these disease processes often necessitates therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Alteration of these agents in the perioperative period for surgery requires a careful risk-benefit analysis to limit disease flares, infection rates, and secondary revisions. We therefore queried North and South American practices for perioperative management of DMARDs in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Methods: An institutional review board-approved pilot survey was disseminated to spine surgeons regarding how they managed DMARDs before, during, and after spine surgery. Results: A total of 47 spine surgeons responded to the survey, 37 of whom were neurosurgeons (78.7%) and 10 orthopedic surgeons (21.3%). Of the respondents, 80.9% were from North America, 72.3% were board-certified, 51.1% practiced in academic institutions, and 66.0% performed 50-150 spine surgeries per year. Most respondents consulted a rheumatologist before continuing or withholding a DMARD in the perioperative period (70.2%). As such, a majority of the spine surgeons in this survey withheld DMARDs at an average of 13.8 days before and 19.6 days after spine surgery. Of the spine surgeons who withheld DMARDs before and after spine surgery, the responses were variable with a trend toward no increased risk of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Based on the results of this pilot survey, we found a consensus among spine surgeons to withhold DMARDs before and after elective spine surgery.

The information required by people with inflammatory arthritis to take methotrexate: a mixed-methods systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize knowledge of the characteristics, content, and preferred format of information to support people with inflammatory arthritis (IA) to take methotrexate. METHODS: A literature search using MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, GreyEU, Web of Science and Open Dissertation was conducted to identify all studies published from 2000 to December 2022. Included studies detailed factors related to methotrexate (MTX) related information needs of people with inflammatory arthritis ≥ 18 years in English. Joanna Briggs Institute Guidelines (JBI) for convergent integrated mixed-methods systematic reviews were followed using validated tools for data extraction and quality. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (seven quantitative, two mixed-methods and four qualitative) were included involving 3425 adults, mainly female n = 2434 (71%), age 20-84 years. An overarching theme of a requirement for person-centred care was developed with three interlinking themes: 1: Accepting the need for treatment with MTX, 2: Concerns about taking MTX, 3: A need for tailored information and support. Limitations of the evidence were use of heterogeneous outcome measures and instruments to measure information needs. CONCLUSION: People with IA have individual, multi-faceted information, and support needs about MTX that are often unresolved when a one-size-fits-all approach is used. The findings can inform rheumatology training to support a person-centred approach to identifying and addressing specific needs, concerns and the development of consistent easy-to-understand accessible MTX information.

Chikungunya Arthritis Treatment with Methotrexate and Dexamethasone: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Chikungunya fever is a reemerging epidemic disease caused by a single-stranded RNA alphavirus transmitted throughout by Aedes mosquitoes. Chikungunya virus infection is a biphasic disease in which 72% to 95% of affected individuals manifest acute chikungunya fever. Following the acute phase, more than 40% of affected individuals develop arthritis, often lasting more than 3 months, referred to as chronic chikungunya arthritis, which frequently mimics rheumatoid arthritis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment of chronic chikungunya arthritis with methotrexate and dexamethasone in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. METHODS: The patients were reassessed for treatment response by the DAS28-ESR, tender joint count and swollen joint count, Patient Global Assessment, and for secondary measures, including the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and Pain Visual Analog Scale. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects were randomized (placebo, n = 16; methotrexate, n = 15); 27 completed treatment and 4 discontinued during the 8-week blinded period. Among the participants, 96.8% were female, with mean ± SD age was 52.9 ± 13. The mean ± SD disease duration prior to treatment was 220.9 ± 51.2 days. At 8 weeks, methotrexate-treated subjects showed a greater numerical trend towards improvement, but there were no significant differences between methotrexate- dexamethasone group and dexamethasone (placebo) group. CONCLUSION: In this relatively small cohort, all of whom received background dexamethasone, there was a greater numerical improvement trend in prespecified outcome measures, but methotrexate in combination with dexamethasone was not superior to dexamethasone in chronic chikungunya arthritis.

Persistence of Janus-kinase (JAK) inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: Australia wide study.

BACKGROUND: To compare persistence of disease-modifying antirheumatic (DMARDs), with a focus on Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in Australian rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted among 4,521 RA patients (females n=3,181 [70.4%]), using data from the Services Australia 10% Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset, aged ≥18 years and initiating a DMARD between 2011 to 2021. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate persistence rates, defined as occurrence of 6 months gap after the end of a drug dispensing. RESULTS: Twelve-month persistence rates were 72% for upadacitinib, 61% for baricitinib, 58% for subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi), 55% for tocilizumab, 53% for tofacitinib, and 49% for abatacept. Median treatment persistence was not reached for upadacitinib (n=574) and baricitinib (n=553); and was 15.0 months for tofacitinib (95% CI 13.5-19.5), 20.5 months for TNFi (95% CI 19.0-22.4), 19.1 months for tocilizumab (95% CI 17.9-23.6), and 12.5 months for abatacept (95% CI 10.4-14.9). Persistence rates on first-line JAK inhibitors were 68% for upadacitinib and baricitinib and 55% for tofacitinib, and 49% for TNFi, 55% for abatacept, and 57% for tocilizumab; rates were sustained for upadacitinib, TNFi, and tocilizumab but dropped to 59% for baricitinib and 47% for abatacept in the second-line treatment. For each b/tsDMARD, persistence rates were higher when combined with methotrexate or other conventional synthetic DMARDs. The median oral glucocorticoid dose decreased from 4.3 mg/day (range:0-40) to 2.3 mg/day (range:0-22) over 2 years. Changes were significant for all RA DMARDs, tofacitinib and baricitinib combined (1-2 years post initiation only), TNFi, abatacept, and tocilizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, we showed highest persistence rates on upadacitinib, followed by baricitinib and then TNFi therapy and was improved by co-therapy. All agents appeared to be corticosteroid sparing.

Effectiveness of bDMARDs in ankylosing spondylitis patients by biologic use: experience from the CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To describe bDMARD initiators by biologic experience among ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and change in disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in real-world US patients. METHODS: We included patients ≥18 years with AS based on physician diagnosis enrolled between 3/2013 and 11/2019 in the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA)/Spondyloarthritis Registry (NCT02530268). Patients concurrently diagnosed with PSA were excluded. Baseline (bDMARD initiation) demographics, comorbidities, disease characteristics, treatment, and PROs were collected. Response rates and changes in disease activity and PROs between baseline and 6- and 12- month follow-up visits were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 489 AS patients in the PsA/SpA Registry, 254 AS (52.0%) patients initiated a bDMARD at enrollment or during follow-up (total initiations: AS = 313). Of the 313 AS initiations, 179 (57.2%) had a 6-month follow-up, 122 (39.0%) had a 12-month follow-up, and 94 (30.0%) had a 6- and 12-month follow-up visit. For those AS initiators with a 6-month follow-up, the mean age was 49.1 years, 44.4% were female, and 70.4%, 47.5%, 96.1%, and 46.9% had never used cDMARDs, TNFis, non-TNFis, and bDMARDs, respectively. Of these 179 AS initiators, 20.1% and 14.0% achieved ASAS20/40, respectively. Further, only 34% achieved low disease activity (ASDAS <2.1). When stratified by biologic-naivete and biologic-experience, the ASAS 20/40 achievement rates were 26.2% and 14.7%, and 21.4% and 7.4%, respectively, for this cohort. CONCLUSION: Although AS patients initiate bDMARDs, many do not achieve optimal treatment responses. Future research is needed to investigate the aspects associated with inadequate improvement and treatment response to bDMARDs.

Treatment patterns of individualized real-life tapering approaches based on shared decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide real-world evidence on patient-individual tapering patterns of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Data obtained through a controlled prospective cohort study in Germany conducted from July 2018 to March 2021 were analyzed. Participants consist of RA patients in sustained remission who were eligible for DMARD tapering at enrolment. Data from RA patients who experienced tapering of DMARDs at least once during the observational period (n = 200) were used. Descriptive analyses of medical outcomes at baseline and at time of first tapering, time to first tapering, tapering patterns by substance group, and tapering intensity were documented. RESULTS: We did not observe meaningful differences in either disease activity or quality of life measures between substance groups at enrolment, time of first tapering, and at 6 or 12 months after tapering. Median time until first tapering varied between substance groups (csDMARDs: 108 days; bDMARDs: 189 days; combination: 119 days). Most patients received one iteration of tapering only (147/200 patients, 73.5%). Dose reduction was applied for patients treated with csDMARDs (79/86 patients, 91.8%), spacing of interval was the most frequent strategy for patients treated with bDMARDs only (43/48 patients, 89.5%). Necessity for increased DMARD dosage was observed in only 10% of patients (20/200). Tapering intensity by substance was overall heterogenous, indicating high individualization. CONCLUSION: We identify highly heterogeneous tapering patterns between substance groups and within substances. Identification and recognition of patient-individual approaches of tapering will help to further improve the management of RA for both patients and rheumatologists.