Predictive factors for cranioplasty complications - A decade's experience.

Introduction: Cranioplasty (CP) following craniectomy provides cerebral protection, improves cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, and restores cosmesis. Although often viewed as minor, CP can have major complications. Research question: This study aims to identify the predictive factors for post-operative complications in patients undergoing CP after decompressive craniectomy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at a tertiary hospital, analyzing patients who underwent CP after decompressive craniectomy (DC) from 2008 to 2019. Patient demographics, medical history, and surgery details were retrieved from hospital records. Complications included symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, extradural or subdural haemorrhage, hydrocephalus, infection, or bone resorption. Results: The study included 168 patients: 139 adults (mean age 47.6 ± 12.68 years) and 29 pediatric patients (mean age 11.8 ± 5.62 years), with a slight male predominance. The overall complication rate was 26.2%, with infection being the most common (8.9%). Predictive factors for CP complications identified by binomial logistic regression, controlling for age and sex, included primary coagulopathy (14.3-fold risk increase, p = 0.034), intraoperative ventricular puncture (7.9-fold risk increase, p = 0.009), and intraoperative dural layer breach (2.8-fold risk increase, p = 0.033). Pre-CP home living was a protective factor. Conclusions: CP requires vigilant management to prevent complications. Primary coagulopathy, intraoperative ventricular puncture, and dural layer breach are significant risk factors for complications.

Intractable seizures after cranioplasty, a dreadful post-operative complication managed efficiently from Nepal: A case series.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Cranioplasty is an elective neurosurgical procedure following decompressive craniectomy, often associated with post-operative complications such as hemorrhage, seizures, infection, hydrocephalus, and bone resorption. While seizures post-cranioplasty is not uncommon, Intractable seizures are rare but a dreadful complication following cranioplasty. CASE SUMMARY: A 23 and 17-year-old male underwent decompression craniectomy for traumatic brain injury and subsequently underwent titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty respectively, During the post-operative period both patients developed intractable seizures. Initially seizures were refractory to multiple anti-epileptic drugs and benzodiazepine induced coma. Intractable seizures were controlled gradually with few anti-epileptic drugs after the removal of cranioplasty. During 2 years' follow-up, there was no new episode of seizures complained by patients. DISCUSSION: Elective cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy after traumatic head injury is one of the commonest surgical modality carried out globally as a life saving measure. But post-operative complications following cranioplasty such as wound infection, implant displacement, bone resorption, hydrocephalus, epidural hematoma are the commonest observed complications whereas post-operative seizure is the most dreadful complication needing immediate intervention. Along with it intractable seizure is rarer during post- operative period. CONCLUSION: Intractable seizures post-cranioplasty, though rare, are serious and often linked to cerebral edema from negative pressure drainage and dysregulation of cerebral blood flow. Removing the cranioplasty can restore blood flow regulation, stabilize brain tissue, and resolve seizures. Care providers should be aware of this rare complication and to be counselled the patient and the family before the surgery.

Complication rates after autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The reimplantation of autologous bone grafts after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is still up for debate. The objective of this study was to analyze the surgical revision rate for autologous cranioplasties in our center, aiming to identify predictors for procedure-related-complications. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted for adult patients who underwent autologous cranioplasty after DC. The primary endpoint was the complication rate in terms of surgical revision and removal of the bone graft: infection, new onset seizures, dislocation, haemorrhage, osteolysis, wound dehiscence and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula. Demographic data, medical records, surgical reports and imaging studies were analysed and risk factors for complications were evaluated. RESULTS: 169 consecutive patients were included. The median interval between DC and cranioplasty was 84 days. Mean age was 51 ± 12.4 years. 26 patients (15.3%) had revision surgery for following reasons. n = 9 implant dislocations (5.3%), n = 7 osteolysis (3.6%), n = 6 infections (3.6%), n = 5 had re-bleedings (3%), n = 5 wound dehiscences (3%), and n = 2 CSF fistulas (1.2%). 18 patients developed new seizures (10.7%). Bi- and multivariate analysis revealed three independent risk factors, simultaneous ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunting increased the risk for material dislocation (p < 0.001); large bone grafts (> 193.5 cm2) increased the risk for osteolysis (p = 0.001) and bifrontal cranioplasties were associated with higher risk for infections (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The complication rates in our study were comparable to previously reported data for autologous or artificial cranioplasties. As osteolysis was correlated to larger bone grafts, a synthetic alternative should be considered in selected cases.

Cerebral contusions - Pathomechanism, predictive factors for progression and historical and current management.

Introduction: Cerebral contusions (CCs) are common traumatic brain injuries known for their propensity to progress. Understanding their mechanical pathogenesis and predictive factors for progression is crucial for optimal management. Research question: To provide an overview of current knowledge on CCs, including pathomechanisms, predictive factors of contusion progression, and management strategies. Material and methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and ISI web of knowledge focused on articles in English with the words "cerebral contusion" together with the words "traumatic brain injury", "pathomechanism", "progression of contusion", "predictive factors" and "management" alone or in combination. Results: The management of CCs has evolved alongside the advances in neurointensive care, yet there is no consensus. Evidence on the effectiveness of early surgery, importantly, for the group which has the potential to expand, is limited. Some predictive factors for contusion progression have been identified, including age, injury mechanism, coagulopathy and initial contusion volume which could help to guide decision-making. Discussion and conclusion: While various theories exist on pathomechanisms and several predictive factors for progression have been proposed, consensus on optimal management remains elusive. Individualized care guided by the predictive factors is essential. Challenges posed by antithrombotic medications highlight the need for early intervention strategies.Decompressive craniectomy could serve as a potential tool in severe traumatic brain injury management including contusions. Conducting large cohort studies to refine predictive models and harmonizing management approaches would help to improve outcomes of patients with CCs.

Safety of labor, Valsalva maneuver, and neuraxial anesthesia for pregnant women after decompressive craniectomy: Case series and review of the literature.

Decompressive craniectomies are a neurosurgical operation aimed at normalizing intracranial pressure (ICP). Occasionally, there is delayed replacement of the skull resulting in an acquired skull defect. When managing laboring patients with an acquired skull defect there is often fear associated with traditional labor involving the Valsalva maneuver and with neuraxial anesthesia. These fears typically stem from potential ICP changes and risk of herniation. In reviewing the literature, only 15 cases are described detailing labor management after decompressive craniectomy (DC), mostly with incomplete labor histories. We aim to expand that literature by reporting two cases of safe labor with epidural anesthesia in patients with large skull defects. The first described patient underwent a cranioplasty during pregnancy because of trauma. Later, because of concerns for pre-eclampsia, induction of labor was initiated and she received neuraxial anesthesia via epidural. The patient ultimately underwent cesarean delivery 48 h after induction began due to nonreassuring fetal heart tones. The second patient underwent a cranioplasty because of infection prior to pregnancy. Once in labor, she was cleared by neurosurgery and the anesthesia team placed her epidural. She later underwent an uncomplicated standard vaginal delivery. The existing literature on labor following DC is sparse. Retrospective review of case reports can advance discussion and standardization regarding care for laboring women with a history of DC. We advocate that the Valsalva maneuver and epidural anesthesia is safe for pregnant women who are neurologically asymptomatic.

Decompressive Hemicraniectomy without Evacuation of Acute Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) are prevalent, with high morbidity and mortality. We analyzed whether decompressive craniectomy (DC) without evacuation of the acute intraparenchymal hematoma could produce better functional outcomes than treatment with evacuation. METHODS: Patients with acute ICH treated with DC without clot evacuation, or evacuation with or without associated craniectomy were included. Matched univariate analyses were performed, and a binary logistic regression model was constructed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) as dependent variables. RESULTS: 27 patients treated with DC without clot evacuation were compared to 36 patients with clot evacuation; eleven of the first group were matched with 18 patients with evacuation. A significantly better functional prognosis in the group treated with DC without clot evacuation was found. Patients aged < 55 years and treated with DC without clot evacuation had a significantly better functional prognosis (p = 0.008 and p = 0.039, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the intervention performed was the greatest predictor of functional status at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: DC without clot evacuation improves the functional prognosis of patients with acute intraparenchymal hematomas. Larger multicenter studies are warranted to determine whether a change in the management of acute ICH should be recommended.

Cranioplasty after Decompressive Craniectomy (DC) in a Patient with Intracerebral Hemorrhage after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination-Related Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT)-Proposal of a Management Protocol for This Rare Pathological Condition.

The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic had a severe impact on public health worldwide. A rare but serious complication after administration of adenoviral vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 (AstraZeneca-Oxford and Johnson & Johnson) is vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT), which can lead to serious complications such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). CVST itself can cause subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and/or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), leading to high mortality due to herniation of brain parenchyma. In those patients, an emergent decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) is regularly performed. Herein, the authors want to focus on the patients who survive DC following VITT-associated CVST and shed light on the neurosurgical considerations in those patients. We herein propose a treatment algorithm regarding the timing and the perioperative management of cranioplasty. We describe an exemplary case highlighting that special circumstances may result in a more urgent need for autologous cranioplasty than usual, based on individual risk assessment.

Decompressive Craniectomy: From Ancient Practices to Modern Neurosurgery.

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical strategy that expels a parcel of the cranium to relieve pressure on a swollen or herniating brain. This review article explores the history of DC, from its ancient roots in trepanning to its contemporary applications. It then examines the mechanisms by which DC reduces intracranial pressure (ICP) and improves cerebral blood flow. The article highlights the efficacy of DC in treating patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and other conditions that cause increased ICP. However, it also acknowledges the potential complications of DC, such as infection and bleeding. The ethical considerations surrounding DC are explored in detail, particularly the challenging decision-making process for patients who are unable to give consent. A specific focus is given to the use of DC in pediatric patients, where the developing brain is especially vulnerable to pressure changes.

Efficacy of decompressive craniectomy: A retrospective case series study with 321 patients and an update on controversies.

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is considered a cornerstone in the management of refractory intracranial hypertension. For decades, DC was known as an occasionally lifesaving procedure; however, it was associated with numerous severe complications. The present study is a single-center retrospective case series study on with 321 patients who underwent DC between January, 2010 and December, 2020. All patients were divided into four groups as follows: Group A included patients who suffered from a space-occupying middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic event; group B included individuals who developed intracerebral hemorrhage; group C included patients admitted for traumatic brain injury; and group D included patients with other neurosurgical entities that underwent DC, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, tumors, brain abscess and cerebral ventricular sinus thrombosis events. The present study enrolled a total of 321 patients who underwent DC. Group A included 52 out of the 321 (16.1%) patients, group B included 51 (15.8%) patients, group C included 164 (51.0%) patients, and group D included 54 (16.8%) patients. Of the 321 patients, 235 (73.2%) were males, and the median age was 53.7 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the group A parameter was an independent factor associated with a Glasgow outcome scale score >2 during follow-up (P<0.05). On the whole, the results of the present study suggest that among patients who underwent DC with different neurological entities, those who had experienced MCA events had more favorable outcomes.

Daily life without cranial bone protection while awaiting cranioplasty: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Decompressive craniectomy is occasionally performed as a life-saving neurosurgical intervention in patients with acute severe brain injury to reduce refractory intracranial hypertension. Subsequently, cranioplasty (CP) is performed to repair the skull defect. In the meantime, patients are living without cranial bone protection, and little is known about their daily life. This study accordingly explored daily life among patients living without cranial bone protection after decompressive craniectomy while awaiting CP. METHODS: A multiple-case study examined six purposively sampled patients, patients' family members, and healthcare staff. The participants were interviewed and the data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The cross-case analysis identified five categories: "Adapting to new ways of living," "Constant awareness of the absence of cranial bone protection," "Managing daily life requires available staff with adequate qualifications," "Impact of daily life depends on the degree of recovery," and "Daily life stuck in limbo while awaiting cranioplasty." The patients living without cranial bone protection coped with daily life by developing new habits and routines, but the absence of cranial bone protection also entailed inconveniences and limitations, particularly among the patients with greater independence in their everyday living. Time spent awaiting CP was experienced as being in limbo, and uncertainty regarding planning was perceived as frustrating. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a vulnerable group of patients with brain damage and communication impairments struggling to find new routines during a waiting period experienced as being in limbo. Making this period safe and reducing some problems in daily life for those living without cranial bone protection calls for a person-centered approach to care involving providing contact information for the correct healthcare institution and individually planned scheduling for CP.

Comparison of Decompressive Craniectomy Versus Craniotomy for Evacuation of Subdural Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute subdural hemorrhage (ASDH) from traumatic brain injury is a life-threatening situation, often requiring surgical intervention. This meta-analysis is done to update the literature regarding the choice of procedure for the treatment of ASDH. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched from the year 2000 up to September 2023. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. The odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) mean difference and standardized mean difference were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies comprising 4686 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled Glasgow Outcome Scale/Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale scores were compared based on their means, with the craniotomy (CO) group having better mean scores than decompressive craniectomy (DC) (standardized mean difference -0.37, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.06, P = 0.02). The risk for poor outcomes was statistically greater in the DC group compared to the CO group (1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.66, P value = 0.02). There were fewer residual subdural hematoma cases in the DC group as compared to CO (odds ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.73, P value < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that the ASDH patients had better functional outcomes when treated with CO as compared to DC. However, there were fewer odds of residual subdural hematoma with DC.

Feasibility Study of Endoscopic Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Large Hematoma: a Comparison with Craniotomy Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with large hematomas is commonly treated with craniotomy combined with decompressive craniectomy, procedures that involve huge trauma and require subsequent cranioplasty. Recently, endoscopic surgery has shown significant promise in treating ICH, but its feasibility for large hematomas remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to compare endoscopic surgery with craniotomy and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery in treating large hematomas ICH. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data from patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH and hematoma volumes exceeding 50 mL who underwent either endoscopic surgery or craniotomy. Propensity score matching analysis was employed to reduce selection bias. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery were evaluated by analyzing blood loss, postoperative edema, mortality rate, complications, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 113 cases that met the criteria were collected, with 65 in the endoscopic surgery group and 48 in the craniotomy group. After propensity score matching, each group contained 34 cases. The mean hematoma volume was 64.84 ± 11.02 mL in the endoscopy group and 66.57 ± 12.77 mL in the craniotomy group (p = 0.554). Hematoma evacuation rates were 93.27% in the endoscopy group and 89.34% in the craniotomy group (p = 0.141). The endoscopy group exhibited lower blood loss, shorter surgical time, and reduced postoperative edema volume at 24 h compared to the craniotomy group. The rate of pulmonary infection was slightly lower in the endoscopy group compared to the craniotomy group (70.59% vs. 91.18%, p = 0.031), but there were no statistically significant differences in overall complications and mortality rate between the two groups. GOS scores were similar in both groups at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic surgery is safe and feasible for treating spontaneous supratentorial ICH with large hematomas, demonstrating efficacy similar to that of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy.

Posttraumatic hydrocephalus as a complication of decompressive craniectomy-same old story, new perspectives.

Objective: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) serves as a vital life-saving intervention, demonstrating efficacy in reducing intracranial pressure (ICP). However, its efficacy hinges on meticulous surgical execution, perioperative management, and vigilance toward potential complications. The incidence of complications associated with DC plays a pivotal role in determining its superiority over medical management for patients experiencing intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Severe cases often require more intensive therapy, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor treatment. Identifying the optimal moment for early extubation and minimizing vasopressor use is crucial to reducing the risk of complications, including PTH. Our study aims to highlight the potential risks associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and long-term vasopressor administration. The collected data were demographics, the craniectomy size, the distance from the midline of the craniectomy, the presence or absence of hydrocephalus, duration of mechanical ventilation and vasopressor treatment, and outcome at 30 days. Results: Seventy-two patients with a mean age of 44.2 (range 5-83) were included in the study, with a median craniectomy size of 119.3 cm2. In our series, craniectomy areas ranged between 30 and 207.5 cm2 and had a similar decrease in midline shift in all cases. We did not observe any associations between the surface of craniectomy and the complication rate (p = 0.6302). There was no association between craniectomy size and mortality rate or length of hospital stay. The most common complication of decompressive craniectomy in our study group was posttraumatic hydrocephalus, with an incidence of 13.8%. Our results showed that craniectomy size did not independently affect PTH development (p = 0.5125). Still, there was a strong correlation between prolonged time of vasopressor treatment (p = 0.01843), period of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.04928), and the development of PTH. Conclusions: This study suggests that there is no clear correlation between craniectomy size, midline shift reduction, and survival rate. An extended period of vasopressor treatment or mechanical ventilation is linked with the development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus. Further studies on larger series or randomized controlled studies are needed to better define this correlation.

Decompressive craniectomy at the National Hospital of Niamey: Prospective study of the epidemioclinical profile, indications, surgical techniques, and results in a context of limited resources.

Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical technique that is gaining renewed interest due to the worldwide resurgence of head injuries. We aimed to analyze the quality of management and prognosis of patients who underwent this surgery in the context of limited resources. Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal, descriptive, and analytical study following STROBE, lasting 36 months at the National Hospital of Niamey in patients who had undergone DC. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: During our study, we collected 74 cases of DC. The mean age was 32.04 years (10-75 years), with male predominance (91.89%). DC was mainly performed following head trauma (95.95%), the main cause of which was road traffic accidents (76%; 54/71). On admission, most patients presented with altered consciousness (95.95%) and pupillary abnormalities (62.16%). The average time between brain damage and brain scan was 31.28 h, with parenchymal contusion being the most frequent lesion (90.54%). The majority of patients (94.59%) underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy. Postoperative complications accounted for 71.62% of all cases, with 33.78% resulting in death. Among survivors, 55.10% had neurological sequelae at the last consultation (27/49). The main factors associated with the risk of death and morbidity were a Glasgow coma score ≤8, pupillary abnormality on admission, the presence of signs of brain engagement, and a long admission delay. Conclusion: Our study shows that the impact of limited resources on our care is moderate. Future research will concentrate on long-term monitoring, particularly focusing on the psychosocial reintegration of patients post-DC.

Decompressive Craniectomy with or Without Dural Closure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Decompressive craniectomy is used to alleviate intracranial pressure in cases of traumatic brain injury and stroke by removing part of the skull to allow brain expansion. Traditionally, this procedure is followed by a watertight dural suture, although evidence supporting this method is not strong. This meta-analysis examines the feasibility of the open-dura (OD) approach versus the traditional closed-dura (CD) technique with watertight suturing. A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis were conducted on OD and CD dural closure techniques. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for relevant trials. The primary end point was the rate of complications, with specific analyses for infection and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Mortality, poor neurological outcomes, and operation duration were also assessed. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Following a comprehensive search, 930 studies were screened, from which four studies and a total of 368 patients were ultimately selected. The primary outcome analysis showed a reduced likelihood of complications in the OD group when compared with the CD group (368 patients, odds ratio 0.54 [95% CI 0.32-0.90]; I2 = 17%; p < 0.05). Specific analysis of infections and CSF leaks did not show statistically significant results, as well as the evaluation of the mortality rates and poor neurological outcome differences between groups. Assessment of operation duration, however, demonstrated a significant difference between techniques, with a mean reduction of 52.50 min favoring the OD approach (mean difference - 52.50 [95% CI - 92.13 to - 12.87]; I2 = 96%). This study supports the viability of decompressive craniectomy without the conventional time-spending watertight duraplasty closure, exhibiting no differences in the rate of infections or CSF leaks. Furthermore, this approach has been associated with improved rates of complications and faster surgery, which are important aspects of this technique, particularly in its potential to reduce both costs and procedure length.

Primary decompressive craniectomy in patients with large intracerebral hematomas due to aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) can alleviate increased intracranial pressure in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with concomitant space-occupying intracerebral hemorrhage, but also carries a high risk for complications. We studied outcomes and complications of DC at time of ruptured aneurysm repair. METHODS: Of 47 patients treated between 2010 and 2020, 30 underwent DC during aneurysm repair and hematoma evacuation and 17 did not. We calculated odds ratios (OR) for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), angiographic vasospasm, DCI-related infarction, and unfavorable functional outcome (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale 1-5) at three months. Complication rates after DC and cranioplasty in the aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were compared to those of all 107 patients undergoing DC for malignant cerebral infarction during the same period. RESULTS: In DC versus no DC patients, proportions were for clinical DCI 37% versus 53% (OR = 0.5;95%CI:0.2-1.8), angiographic vasospasm 37% versus 47% (OR = 0.7;95%CI:0.2-2.2), DCI-related infarctions 17% versus 47% (OR = 0.2;95%CI:0.1-0.7) and unfavorable outcome 80% versus 88% (OR = 0.5;95%CI:0.1-3.0). ORs were similar after adjustment for baseline predictors for outcome. Complications related to DC and cranioplasty occurred in 18 (51%) of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients and 41 (38%) of cerebral infarction patients (OR = 1.7;95%CI:0.8-3.7). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and concomitant space-occupying intracerebral hemorrhage, early DC was not associated with improved functional outcomes, but with a reduced rate of DCI-related infarctions. This potential benefit has to be weighed against high complication rates of DC in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Analysis of Causes of Complications and Prognostic Factors After Titanium Mesh Ultra-Early Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy for Craniocerebral Trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Craniocerebral trauma is one of the main causes of death and disability worldwide. Decompressive craniectomy is a common emergency measure in the treatment of craniocerebral trauma, aimed at relieving intracranial pressure. However, cranial bone reconstruction (CP) following this surgery is crucial for the patient's long-term recovery. Despite this, research on complications and prognostic factors after ultra-early cranioplasty remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to explore the complications of ultra-early cranioplasty with titanium mesh and its impact on prognosis. METHODS: From January 2020 to November 2022, 44 patients with craniocerebral trauma who needed ultra-early CP after decompressive craniectomy were collected. The basic data of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Glasgow Coma Scale, modified Rankin Scale, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores of patients were collected, and the complications and prognosis of patients 3 months after operation were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Compared with preoperative, the postoperative NIHSS score of patients with ultra-early CP decreased, the postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score increased, the postoperative modified Rankin Scale score decreased (P < 0.05), and the postoperative Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was higher. Postoperative complications occurred in 42 patients with ultra-early CP. There were 37 complications, including 7 cases of hydroaccumulation, 18 cases of hematocele, 11 cases of pneumatosis, 3 cases of scalp swelling, 2 cases of epilepsy, 10 cases of hydrocephalus, and 1 case of intracranial infection, and no incision infection occurred. Age and postoperative NIHSS score were related factors affecting the poor prognosis of ultra-early CP patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-early CP can promote the recovery of neurological function, reduce the disturbance of consciousness, improve daily living ability, and improve cognitive function in patients with craniocerebral trauma, but there is a high risk of postoperative complications. In addition, age and postoperative NIHSS score are related factors affecting the poor prognosis of ultra-early CP patients.

Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Malignant Stroke with Additional Vascular Territory.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy substantially reduces mortality and disability rates following a malignant stroke. This procedure remains a life-saving option, especially in contexts with little access to mechanical thrombectomy despite downward trends in the performance of decompressive craniectomy due to discussions on the acceptance of living with severe disabilities. However, the outcomes of the surgery in cases involving concomitant occlusion of anterior or posterior cerebral arteries have not been extensively studied. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, spanning January 2010 to December 2022 and including patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy, we compared outcomes between patients with and without additional vascular territory involvement. Independent variables included age, sex, comorbidities, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Glasgow Coma Scale scores, time elapsed between stroke and surgery, laterality of the stroke, midline shift, and postoperative infarction volume. Outcomes included mortality and modified Rankin Score at the 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 86 patients analyzed, 61 (70.9%) and 25 (29.1%) demonstrated no territory and additional territory involvement, respectively. Patients with involvement of additional territories exhibited lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores, higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and larger postoperative infarction volumes. However, these variables were not associated with poor outcomes. Univariate analyses revealed no differences in mortality or severe disability. Even after adjustment, the differences remained insignificant for mortality and severe disability. Age emerged as the sole variable linked to increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, for patients with malignant stroke undergoing decompressive craniectomy, the outcomes for patients with and without involvement of additional vascular territory are similar.

Cerebral Edema Monitoring and Management Strategies: Results from an International Practice Survey.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral edema is a common, potentially life-threatening complication in critically ill patients with acute brain injury. However, uncertainty remains regarding best monitoring and treatment strategies, which may result in wide practice variations. METHODS: A 20-question digital survey on monitoring and management practices was disseminated between July 2022 and May 2023 to clinicians who manage cerebral edema. The survey was promoted through email, social media, medical conferences, and the Neurocritical Care Society Web site. We used the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and logistic regression to report factors associated with practice variation, diagnostic monitoring methods, and therapeutic triggers based on practitioner and institutional characteristics. RESULTS: Of 321 participants from 160 institutions in 30 countries, 65% were from university-affiliated centers, 74% were attending physicians, 38% were woman, 38% had neurology training, and 55% were US-based. Eighty-four percent observed practice variations at their institutions, with "provider preference" being cited most (87%). Factors linked to variation included gender, experience, university affiliation, and practicing outside the United States. University affiliates tended to use more tests (median 3.87 vs. 3.43, p = 0.01) to monitor cerebral edema. Regarding management practices, 20% of respondents' preferred timing for decompressive hemicraniectomy was after 48 h, and 37% stated that radiographic findings only would be sufficient to trigger surgery. Fifty percent of respondents reported initiating osmotic therapy based on radiographic indications or prophylactically. There were no significant associations between management strategies and respondent or center characteristics. Twenty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they acquired neuroimaging at intervals of 24 h or less. Within this group, attending physicians were more likely to follow this practice (65.5% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral edema monitoring and management strategies vary. Features associated with practice variations include both practitioner and institutional characteristics. We provide a foundation for understanding practice patterns that is crucial for informing educational initiatives, standardizing guidelines, and conducting future trials.

Unseparated Temporal Muscle and Duramater Cranioplasty Methods Following Decompressive Craniectomy: Technical Note.

Objective: Cranioplasty (CP) is used to repair cranial defects after decompressive craniectomy. During this procedure, the temporal muscle can contract or retract toward the base and adhere to the scalp flaps above and/or below the dura. Several complications including functional and cosmetic problems can occur following CP. This study presents the technical notes and outcomes of CP. Methods: This retrospective observational study collect data of CP-procedures using unseparated muscle-dura technique performed at our hospital in 2019-2022. Technical note is presented regarding the lack of separation of the temporal muscles from the dura mater. A bone flap or titanium mesh was placed above the temporal muscle layer, which was still attached to the dura mater. Functional outcomes were evaluated using OHIP-14 Questionnaire to assess mastication quality. Results: Twenty-three patients were included in this study. Initial surgeries were mostly caused by trauma (65.2%). Most patients underwent autologous bone flap CP (52.2%), during which the bone flap was stored in either the abdominal subcutaneous pocket or cryoprecipitated. Only one patient experienced mastication problems after CP (p<0.001). Temporal hollowing remained a problem in this technique. However, dissection of the temporalis muscle to reduce temporal hollowing can cause facial nerve injuries and masticatory problems. Due to the lack of temporal muscle manipulation, our patients had minimal mastication problems. Conclusion: CP should be performed to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. A CP technique with the temporal muscle unseparated from the dura mater can be selected to avoid damage to the muscle and mastication problems after surgery.