Clinical benefits of deep inspiration breath-hold in postoperative radiotherapy for right-sided breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to emphasize the clinical importance of the Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) technique by quantifying its dosimetric advantages over Free Breathing (FB) in reducing radiation exposure to the heart, liver, and lungs for right-sided breast cancer patients. This evidence supports its potential for routine clinical use to mitigate radiation-induced toxicity. METHODS: A systematic retrieval of controlled trials comparing DIBH and FB techniques in postoperative radiotherapy for right-sided breast cancer was conducted utilizing the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The primary outcomes assessed included the doses of adjacent normal tissues (heart, liver, and lungs). Summary standardized mean differences (SMD) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed, respectively. StataMP 17 software was selected to perform data analysis. RESULTS: The study encompassed an analysis of 313 patients derived from seven online studies, comprising 168 individuals in the DIBH group and 269 individuals in the FB group. The findings indicated that the DIBH group received significantly lower irradiation doses to the heart, liver, and lungs in comparison to the FB group, with statistical significance (heart dose: SMD = -0.63, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.41, P < 0.05; liver dose: SMD = -1.15, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.38, P < 0.05; lung dose: SMD = -0.79, 95% CI -1.23 to -0.35, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicated that the application of DIBH during postoperative radiotherapy for right-sided breast cancer markedly decreases radiation exposure to the heart, liver, and lungs, while maintaining consistent tumor dose coverage. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

How Effective is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Minimizing Cardiac Doses During Hybrid Radiotherapy Treatment for Left-Sided Breast Cancer with Comprehensive Regional Nodes?

BACKGROUND: In the context of left breast cancer radiotherapy, long term cardiopulmonary toxicity has been well-documented, significant efforts have been undertaken to mitigate such toxicity by using 4D gating, deep inspiration breath-hold(DIBH) and active breath control(ABC) techniques. PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the cardio-pulmonary radiation doses incurred during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in two distinct breathing conditions such as DIBH and Free Breathing (FB), with a specific focus on the left chest wall with comprehensive regional nodal irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective dosimetric study was conducted on 15 patients who received adjuvant loco-regional radiotherapy of chest-wall (CW), supraclavicular fossa(SCF), and internal mammary region(IMC), with or without axilla. Two sets of planning CT scans were taken in DIBH and FB conditions. The dosimetric difference between DIBH CT and FB CT plans analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, employing SPSS software version 21.0. RESULTS: Comparison of DIBH and FB parameters for target coverage revealed a statistically significant advantage with DIBH in SCF(D95, V90, p<0.017) and IMC(D98, V90 & V95, p<0.03). Dosimetric characteristics of heart and LAD exhibited statistically significant lower doses with DIBH (V20, V25, and Dmean, p<0.001) compared to FB plans. Lung doses were similar with no discernible advantage of one technique over the other. Other OARs such as contralateral breast (p=0.027) and esophagus (p=0.001) received lower doses with the DIBH technique while the spinal cord (p=0.691) and thyroid(p=0.496) showed no significant difference. Maximum heart distance (p= 0.001), central lung distance (p= 0.011) and Haller index (p= 0.001) exhibited statistical significance between the two techniques, whereas chest wall separation showed no significant statistical difference (p=0.629). CONCLUSION: DIBH demonstrates a substantial reduction in cardiac and LAD doses compared to the FB technique. This study underscores the efficacy of DIBH as a viable strategy for mitigating cardiac and LAD radiation doses in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing PMRT of chest wall with comprehensive regional nodes.

Dose advantage of abdominal deep inspiratory breath-hold (aDIBH) in postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for left breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We explored the dosimetric efficacy of the abdominal deep inspiration breath hold (aDIBH) technique using an audio-guided device in patients with left breast cancer undergoing postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy compared to free breathing (FB). METHODS: A total of 35 patients with early stage left breast cancer underwent two computed tomography simulation scans each with aDIBH and FB after breast-conserving surgery. Treatment planning was optimized using the Pinnacle3 9.10 planning system. The heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA), and left lung was defined as organs at risk (OARs). The dosimetric differences in the planning target volume (PTV) and OARs were compared between aDIBH and FB. RESULTS: Compared with FB, the heart moved farther caudally and away from the chest wall, and the volume of heart became smaller under aDIBH due to expansion of the lungs. The D mean of the heart, LADCA and left lung of aDIBH were respectively reduced by 332.79 ± 264.61 cGy (P < 0.001), 1290.37 ± 612.09 cGy (P < 0.047) and 69.94 ± 117.73 cGy (P < 0.001). The V20 and V30 of the OARs were also significantly reduced with statistical differences (P < 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in the dosimetric parameters of the PTV between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the aDIBH technique for postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery of the left breast cancer could reduce irradiation of the heart dose, LADCA dose and left lung dose, without compromising target coverage.

Evaluation of helical tomotherapy as an alternative for left-sided breast cancer patients not compliant with deep inspiration breath hold.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate, from a dosimetric perspective, whether helical Tomotherapy (HT) during free breathing (FB) can serve as an alternative technique for treating left-sided breast cancer patients who are unable to comply with the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique. Material and Methods: For this purpose, the CT images of 20 left breast-only cancer patients acquired in both FB and DIBH phases were utilized. The left breast was contoured as the target volume, while the heart, LAD, ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, and contralateral breast were contoured as organs at risk on the CT images obtained in both DIBH and FB. Planning with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique was performed on the CT scans obtained in the DIBH (VMAT-DIBH), while planning with the HT technique was carried out on the CT scans obtained in the FB (HT-FB). Subsequently, dosimetric comparison of the plans were done in terms of target coverage and preservation of normal tissues. Results: Both techniques achieved the desired target coverage; however, in terms of D2, Vpres values, Conformity Number (CN), and Homogeneity Index (HI), the HT-FB technique was found to be superior. While the mean doses to the heart were similar for both techniques, doses to the LAD and left lung were found to be superior in plans generated with the HT-FB technique. When compared in terms of contralateral breast and right lung protection, VMAT-DIBH technique was found to be significantly superior. Conclusion: The treatment of left breast-only patients with the HT-FB technique has been observed to provide similar heart protection and better LAD and ipsilateral lung protection compared to the VMAT-DIBH technique without compromising target coverage. However, when the HT-FB technique is used, doses to the contralateral lung and contralateral breast should be carefully evaluated.

Cardiac segments dosimetric benefit from deep inspiration breath hold technique for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.

Background: The objective was to compare dosimetry in left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) patients receiving deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy (RT) with free-breathing (FB) treatment plans. Materials and methods: Voluntary DIBH with a spirometer-based video-assisted system and CT-simulation were performed under FB and DIBH conditions on 40 LSBC patients, segmented according Duane's atlas. IMRT plans kept the same dosimetric goals on FB and DIBH conditions. Target, lungs and heart volumes were measured. Planning target volume (PTV) dose distribution, organs at risk (OARs) dose/volume parameters, including cardiac substructures, were calculated. Results: Lungs and left-lung volumes increased in DIBH conditions (ΔV = 1637.8 ml ± 555.3 and 783.5 ml ± 286.4, respectively). Heart volume slightly decreased in apnea (p = 0.04), but target volumes, CTV and PTV were similar in FB or DIBH plans. PTV dose coverage was similar irrespective of respiratory conditions (median D50% = 41.1 Gy vs 41.0 Gy, p = 0.665; V95% = 96.9% vs. 97%). Mean dose for the whole heart (MHD), left ventricle (LV), and LV segments were significantly reduced in DIBH plans. V20 values for heart subvolumes were significantly different only for those that received considerable doses (apical and anterior). DIBH plans provided significantly smaller doses (Dmax, D2%, and V20) to the LAD artery. Conclusion: Important dosimetric improvements can be achieved with DIBH technique for LSBC patients, reducing the dose to the LAD artery and heart, particularly to the segments closer to the chest wall. Apical/anterior LV segments, should be considered as separate organ at risk in breast RT.

Surface-guided radiotherapy systems in locoregional deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy for breast cancer - a multicenter study on the setup accuracy.

Background: Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique are recommended for locoregional RT of breast cancer. The optimal workflow for a combination of surface-guided RT (SGRT) with DIBH technique is of current clinical interest. Materials and methods: The setup accuracy at three hospitals was evaluated using different SGRT workflows. A total of 150 patients (2269 image pairs) were analyzed in three groups: patient setup with the AlignRT® SGRT system in Tampere (Site 1, n = 50), the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Turku (Site 2, n = 50) and the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Jönköping (Site 3, n = 50). Each site used their routine workflow with SGRT-based setup and IGRT positioning. Residual errors of the bony chest wall, thoracic vertebra (Th 1) and humeral head were evaluated using IGRT images. Results: Systematic residual errors in the cranio-caudal (CC) direction and in pitch were generally larger at Site 2 than those at Sites 1 and 3 (p = 0.01-0.7). With daily IGRT, only a small difference (p = 0.01-0.9) was observed in residual random errors of bony structures in other directions between sites. Conclusion: The introduction of SGRT and the use of daily IGRT lead to small residual errors when combining the best workflow practices from different hospitals. Our multicenter evaluation led to improved workflow by tightening the SGRT tolerances on Site 2 and fixation modification. Because of mainly small random errors, systematic posture errors in the images need to be corrected after posture correction with new setup surfaces. We recommend tight SGRT tolerances, good fixation and correction of systematic errors.

Feasibility of a deep-inspiration breath-hold [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 PET/CT imaging on upper-abdominal lesions in NET patients: in comparison with respiratory-gated PET/CT.

PURPOSES: To explore the clinical feasibility and efficacy of a deep inspiration breath-hold (BH) PET/CT using [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 on upper abdominal lesions in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent a free-breath (FB) whole-body PET/CT, including a 10 min/bed scan for the upper abdomen with a vital signal monitoring for respiratory gating (RG) followed by a 20-second BH PET/CT covering the same axial range. For the upper abdomen bed, the following PET series was reconstructed: a 2-min FB PET; RG PET (6 bins); a 20-second and 15-second BH PET (BH_15 and BH_20). Semi-quantitative analysis was performed to compare liver SUVmean, lesion SUVmax, MTV, its percentage difference and target-to-background ratio (TBR) between both BH PET and RG PET images. Subgroup analysis considered lesion location, MTV and SUVmax. A 5-point Likert scale was used to perform visual analysis and any missed or additional lesions were identified compared with RG PET. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis on overall lesions (n = 78) revealed higher SUVmax and TBR, and smaller MTV for both BH PET compared to FB and RG PET, with lesion location-specific variations. Neither significant difference was observed in all metrics between RG and FB PET in larger lesions, nor in MTV in lower-uptake lesions. However, both BH PET significantly enhanced these measurements. In the visual analysis, both BH PET showed noninferior performance to RG PET, and were evaluated clinically acceptable. Additional and missed lesions were observed in FB and both BH PET compared with RG PET, but didn't alter the clinical management. The BH_15 PET showed comparable performance to BH_20 PET in any comparison. CONCLUSION: The BH PET/CT using [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 is effective in detecting upper abdominal lesions, offering more accurate quantitative measurements. Using a novel PET/CT scanner, a 15-second BH PET can provide comparable and superior performance to RG PET, indicating potential feasibility in clinical routines.

Selection criteria and method for deep inspiration breath-hold in patients with left breast cancer undergoing PMRT/IMRT.

Purpose: This study explored whether a free-breathing mean heart dose (FB-MHD) of 4 Gy is a reliable dose threshold for selecting left breast cancer patients after modified radical mastectomy suitable for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and developed anatomical indicators to predict FB-MHD for rapid selection. Materials and methods: Twenty-three patients with left breast cancer treated with DIBH were included to compare FB and DIBH plans. The patients were divided into the high-risk (FB-MHD ≥ 4 Gy) and low-risk (FB-MHD < 4 Gy) groups to compare dose difference, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and the DIBH benefits. Another 30 patients with FB only were included to analyze the capacity of distinguishing high-risk heart doses patients according to anatomical metrics, such as cardiac-to-chest Euclidean distance (CCED), cardiac-to-chest gap (CCG), and cardiac-to-chest combination (CCC). Results: All heart doses were significantly lower in patients with DIBH plans than in those with FB plans. Based on FB-MHD of 4 Gy cutoff, the heart dose, NTCP for cardiac death, and benefits from DIBH were significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. The CCED was a valid anatomical indicator with the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 and maintained 95 % sensitivity and 70 % specificity at the optimal cutoff value of 2.5 mm. Conclusions: An FB-MHD of 4 Gy could be used as an efficient dose threshold for selecting patients suitable for DIBH. The CCED may allow a reliable prediction of FB-MHD in left breast cancer patients at CT simulation.

Postoperative radiotherapy for right breast cancer with regional nodal irradiation utilizing the surface-guided radiotherapy based deep inspiration breath hold technique on a TrueBeam HD linear accelerator: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) has proven effective in minimizing radiation exposure to organs at risk (OARs) in right-sided breast cancer patients requiring regional nodal irradiation (RNI). However, there has been no dosimetric evaluation comparing DIBH techniques to free-breathing (FB) conditions on the TrueBeam (TB) HD linear accelerator (LINAC). To address this gap and accommodate breast cancer patients requiring RNI on the TB HD LINAC, an innovative method involving a 90-degree rotation of the regional lymph nodes' field during treatment planning was devised. CASE DESCRIPTION: The study focused on a 39-year-old woman who underwent right breast-conserving radical surgery and subsequently required postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Both noncontrast FB and DIBH computed tomography (CT) scans were performed using a CT simulator. Due to limitations in MLC field length, a 90-degree rotation was employed for planning the regional lymph nodes' field on the TB LINAC. Patient positioning accuracy was ensured by aligning based on body surface under both FB and DIBH conditions, facilitated by an optical surface management system (OSMS). The target volume and OARs were meet the dose limit on the TB HD LINAC. Noteworthy reductions in radiation exposure to the right lung and liver were evident with DIBH. The mean dose reduction rate for the right lung was 11.9%, while the mean dose reduction rate for the liver was 68.9%. Parameters such as V5, V20, V30, and mean dose (Dmean) also demonstrated decreases with DIBH compared to FB. CONCLUSIONS: This case report underscores the potential of TB HD LINAC for formulating treatment approaches for breast cancer involving RNI. Furthermore, it emphasizes the effectiveness of DIBH radiotherapy in mitigating doses to OARs when implemented on the TB LINAC.

Comparison of deep inspiration breath hold and free breathing intensity modulated proton therapy of locally advanced lung cancer.

Background and purpose: For locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) can reduce organ at risk (OAR) doses compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) reduces OAR doses compared to free breathing (FB) in IMRT. In IMPT, differences in dose distributions and robustness between DIBH and FB are unclear. In this study, we compare DIBH to FB in IMPT, and IMPT to IMRT. Materials and methods: Fortyone LA-NSCLC patients were prospectively included. 4D computed tomography images (4DCTs) and DIBH CTs were acquired for treatment planning and during weeks 1 and 3 of treatment. A new system for automated robust planning was developed and used to generate a FB and a DIBH IMPT plan for each patient. Plans were compared in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). Dose recalculations on repeat CTs were used to compare inter-fraction plan robustness. Results: In IMPT, DIBH reduced median lungs Dmean from 9.3 Gy(RBE) to 8.0 Gy(RBE) compared to FB, and radiation pneumonitis NTCP from 10.9 % to 9.4 % (p < 0.001). Inter-fraction plan robustness for DIBH and FB was similar. Median NTCPs for radiation pneumonitis and mortality were around 9 percentage points lower with IMPT than IMRT (p < 0.001). These differences were much larger than between FB and DIBH within each modality. Conclusion: DIBH IMPT resulted in reduced lung dose and radiation pneumonitis NTCP compared to FB IMPT. Inter-fraction robustness was comparable. OAR doses were far lower in IMPT than IMRT.

Application and dosimetric comparison of surface-guided deep inspiration breath-hold for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Respiratory motion management is the crucial challenge for safe and effective application of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The present study implemented lung SBRT treatment in voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) with surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system and evaluated the geometric and dosimetric benefits of DIBH to organs-at-risk (OARs), aiming to advising the choice between DIBH technology and conventional free breathing 4 dimensions (FB-4D) technology. Five patients of lung SBRT treated in DIBH with SGRT at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. CT scans were acquired in DIBH and FB-4D, treatment plans were generated for both respiratory phases. The geometric and dosimetry of tumor, ipsilateral lung, double lungs and heart were compared between the DIBH and FB-4D treatment plans. In terms of target coverage, utilizing DIBH significantly reduced the mean plan target volume (PTV) by 21.9% (p = 0.09) compared to FB-4D, the conformity index (CI) of DIBH and FB-4D were comparable, but the dose gradient index (DGI) of DIBH was higher. With DIBH expanding lung, the volumes of ipsilateral lung and double lungs were 2535.1 ± 403.0cm3 and 4864.3 ± 900.2cm3, separately, 62.2% (p = 0.009) and 73.1% (p = 0.009) more than volumes of ipsilateral lung (1460.03 ± 146.60cm3) and double lungs (2811.25 ± 603.64cm3) in FB-4D. The heart volume in DIBH was 700.0 ± 146.1cm3, 11.6% (p = 0.021) less than that in FB-4D. As for OARs protection, the mean dose, percent of volume receiving > 20Gy (V20) and percent of volume receiving > 5Gy (V5) of ipsilateral lung in DIBH were significantly lower by 33.2% (p = 0.020), 44.0% (p = 0.022) and 24.5% (p = 0.037) on average, separately. Double lungs also showed significant decrease by 31.1% (p = 0.019), 45.5% (p = 0.024) and 20.9% (p = 0.048) on average for mean dose, V20 and V5 in DIBH. Different from the lung, the mean dose and V5 of heart showed no consistency between DIBH and FB-4D, but lower maximum dose of heart was achieved in DIBH for all patients in this study. Appling lung SBRT in DIBH with SGRT was feasibly performed with high patient compliance. DIBH brought significant dosimetric benefits to lung, however, it caused more or less irradiated heart dose that depend on the patients' individual differences which were unpredictable.

The impact of deep-inspiration breath-hold total-body PET/CT imaging on thoracic 18F-FDG avid lesions compared with free-breathing.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate PET/CT registration and quantification accuracy of thoracic lesions of a single 30-second deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique with a total-body PET (TB-PET) scanner, and compared with free-breathing (FB) PET/CT. METHODS: 137 of the 145 prospectively enrolled patients finished a routine FB-300 s PET/CT exam and a 30-second DIBH TB-PET with chest to pelvis low dose CT. The total-body FB-300 s, FB-30 s, and DIBH-30 s PET images were reconstructed. Quantitative assessment (SUVmax and SUVmean of lung and other organs), PET/CT registration assessment and lesion analysis (SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean and tumor-background ratio) were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: The SUVmax and SUVmean of the lung with DIBH-30 s were significantly lower than those with FB. The distances of the liver dome between PET and CT were significantly smaller with DIBH-30 s than with FB. 195 assessable lesions in 106 patients were included, and the detection sensitivity was 97.9 % and 99.0 % in FB-300 s, and DIBH-30 s, respectively. For both small co-identified lesions (n = 86) and larger co-identified lesions with a diameter ≥ 1 cm (n = 91), the lesion SUVs were significantly greater with DIBH-30 s than with FB-300 s. Regarding lesion location, the differences of the SUVs for the lesions in the lower thorax area (n = 97, p < 0.001) were significant between DIBH-30 s and FB-300 s, while these differences were not statistically significant in the upper thorax (n = 80, p > 0.05). The lesion tumor-to-surrounding-background ratio (TsBR) was significantly increased, both in the upper and lower thorax. CONCLUSION: The TB DIBH PET/CT technique is feasible in clinical practice. It reduces the background lung uptake and achieves better registration and lesion quantification, especially in the lower thorax.

Evaluating intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-hold.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and to investigate the adequacy of the current planning target volume (PTV) margins. METHODS: Twenty-eight lung SBRT patients with DIBH were selected in this study. Among the lesions, twenty-three were at right or left lower lobe, two at right middle lobe, and three at right or left upper lobe. Post-treatment gated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was acquired to quantify the intra-fractional tumor shift at each treatment. These obtained shifts were then used to calculate the required PTV margin, which was compared with the current applied margin of 5 mm margin in anterior-posterior (AP) and right-left (RL) directions and 8 mm in superior-inferior (SI) direction. The beam delivery time was prolonged with DIBH. The actual beam delivery time with DIBH (Tbeam_DIBH) was compared with the beam delivery time without DIBH (Tbeam_wo_DIBH) for the corresponding SBRT plan. RESULTS: A total of 113 treatments were analyzed. At six treatments (5.3%), the shifts exceeded the tolerance defined by the current PTV margin. The average shifts were 0.0 ± 1.9 mm, 0.1±1.5 mm, and -0.5 ± 3.7 mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The required PTV margins were determined to be 4.5, 3.9, and 7.4 mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The average Tbeam_wo_DIBH and Tbeam_DIBH were 2.4 ± 0.4 min and 3.6 ± 1.5 min, respectively. The average treatment slot for lung SBRT with DIBH was 25.3 ± 7.9 min. CONCLUSION: Intra-fractional tumor motion is the predominant source of treatment uncertainties in CBCT-guided lung SBRT with DIBH. The required PTV margin should be determined based on data specific to each institute, considering different techniques and populations. Our data indicate that our current applied PTV margin is adequate, and it is possible to reduce further in the RL direction. The time increase of Tbeam_DIBH, relative to the treatment slot, is not clinically significant.

Eliciting the views of left breast cancer patients' receiving deep inspiration breath hold radiation therapy to inform the design of multimedia education and improve patient-centred care for prospective patients.

INTRODUCTION: The currently accepted best practice radiation treatment for left breast cancer patients is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) where patients hold a deep breath to reduce late cardiac and pulmonary effects from treatment. DIBH can be challenging and induce or exacerbate anxiety in patients due to the perceived pressure to reduce radiation treatment side effects. This study explored the experiences of patients treated with Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Radiation Therapy (DIBH-RT) to improve patient-centred care and inform the design of multimedia educational tools for future patients undergoing DIBH. METHODS: This descriptive qualitative study was underpinned by a social constructivist approach to create new educational and patient care approaches based on previous patients' experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who had completed DIBH-RT for breast cancer. Data was analysed with reflexive thematical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were interviewed with five key themes identified: (1) informational needs, (2) care needs, (3) autonomy, (4) DIBH performance influencers and (5) other centredness. Recommendations were derived from these themes to improve future treatments of DIBH patients. These recommendations revolved around improvements to education, patient-centred care and strategies to improve self-efficacy with breath holding. CONCLUSION: Patients offer a wealth of knowledge regarding their lived experiences with treatment which can enhance future patients' experiences if incorporated into their education and care. Eliciting patients' views of their DIBH-RT treatment highlighted the need to improve patient self-efficacy with DIBH through familiarity with their planned treatment from new multimedia education, and foster patient care to enhance their experience.

A Prospective Study on Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Thoracic Radiation Therapy Guided by Bronchoscopically Implanted Electromagnetic Transponders.

BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic transponders bronchoscopically implanted near the tumor can be used to monitor deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for thoracic radiation therapy (RT). The feasibility and safety of this approach require further study. METHODS: We enrolled patients with primary lung cancer or lung metastases. Three transponders were implanted near the tumor, followed by simulation with DIBH, free breathing, and 4D-CT as backup. The initial gating window for treatment was ±5 mm; in a second cohort, the window was incrementally reduced to determine the smallest feasible gating window. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as completion of RT using transponder-guided DIBH. Patients were followed for assessment of transponder- and RT-related toxicity. RESULTS: We enrolled 48 patients (35 with primary lung cancer and 13 with lung metastases). The median distance of transponders to tumor was 1.6 cm (IQR 0.6-2.8 cm). RT delivery ranged from 3 to 35 fractions. Transponder-guided DIBH was feasible in all but two patients (96% feasible), where it failed because the distance between the transponders and the antenna was >19 cm. Among the remaining 46 patients, 6 were treated prone to keep the transponders within 19 cm of the antenna, and 40 were treated supine. The smallest feasible gating window was identified as ±3 mm. Thirty-nine (85%) patients completed one year of follow-up. Toxicities at least possibly related to transponders or the implantation procedure were grade 2 in six patients (six incidences, cough and hemoptysis), grade 3 in three patients (five incidences, cough, dyspnea, pneumonia, and supraventricular tachycardia), and grade 4 pneumonia in one patient (occurring a few days after implantation but recovered fully and completed RT). Toxicities at least possibly related to RT were grade 2 in 18 patients (41 incidences, most commonly cough, fatigue, and pneumonitis) and grade 3 in four patients (seven incidences, most commonly pneumonia), and no patients had grade 4 or higher toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Bronchoscopically implanted electromagnetic transponder-guided DIBH lung RT is feasible and safe, allowing for precise tumor targeting and reduced normal tissue exposure. Transponder-antenna distance was the most common challenge due to a limited antenna range, which could sometimes be circumvented by prone positioning.

A Case of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in a Patient With Fabry Disease.

Fabry disease is a metabolic disorder caused by a deficiency in lysosomal enzymes and is inherited as an X-chromosomal disorder. Patients with Fabry disease have a low incidence of cancer, and reports of malignant tumors, especially in the thoracic region, are rare. In this case report, we describe our experience with radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery in a patient with left breast cancer and Fabry disease, and we review the existing literature. The patient, a woman in her 40s, required postoperative irradiation for left breast cancer (pT1N0M0). There were several patients with Fabry disease in her family, and the diagnosis of Fabry disease was made five years ago. Cardiac function evaluation revealed no significant abnormalities, but a myocardial biopsy had suggested the presence of Fabry disease. Due to the relatively preserved distance between the heart and the chest wall, the patient received heart-shielded three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy at a dose of 53.2 Gy in 20 fractions, without the use of deep-inspiration breath-hold or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. After treatment was completed, only mild radiation dermatitis was observed. Six months have passed since treatment, and there have been no serious adverse events.

Protocol of a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep-inspiration breath-hold daily online adaptive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours (PUDDING study).

BACKGROUND: Centrally located lung tumours present a challenge because of their tendency to exhibit symptoms such as airway obstruction, atelectasis, and bleeding. Surgical resection of these tumours often requires sacrificing the lungs, making definitive radiotherapy the preferred alternative to avoid pneumonectomy. However, the proximity of these tumours to mediastinal organs at risk increases the potential for severe adverse events. To mitigate this risk, we propose a dual-method approach: deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy combined with adaptive radiotherapy. The aim of this single-centre, single-arm phase II study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with centrally located lung tumours according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommendations, are enrolled and subjected to DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy. The primary endpoint is the one-year cumulative incidence of grade 3 or more severe adverse events, as classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). DISCUSSION: Delivering definitive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours presents a dilemma between ensuring optimal dose coverage for the planning target volume and the associated increased risk of adverse events. DIBH provides measurable dosimetric benefits by increasing the normal lung volume and distancing the tumour from critical mediastinal organs at risk, leading to reduced toxicity. DIBH adaptive radiotherapy has been proposed as an adjunct treatment option for abdominal and pelvic cancers. If the application of DIBH adaptive radiotherapy to centrally located lung tumours proves successful, this approach could shape future phase III trials and offer novel perspectives in lung tumour radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ); registration number: jRCT1052230085 ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1052230085 ).

Deep inspirational breast hold (DIBH) for right breast irradiation: Improved sparing of liver and lung tissue.

Objective: To reduce liver and lung dose during right breast irradiation while maintaining optimal dose to the target volume. This dose reduction has the potential to decrease acute side effects and long-term toxicity. Materials and Methods: 16 patients treated with radiation therapy for localized carcinoma of the right breast were included retrospectively. For the planning CT, each patient was immobilised on an indexed board with the arms placed above the head. CT scans were acquired in free-breathing (FB) as well as with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). Both scans were acquired with the same length. Planning target volumes (PTV's) were created with a 5 mm margin from the respective clinical target volumes (CTV's) on both CT datasets. The liver was outlined as scanned. Dose metrics evaluated were as follows: differences in PTV coverage, dose to the liver (max, mean, V90%, V50%, V30%), dose to lung (mean, V20Gy, relative electron density) and dose to heart (Dmax). The p-values were calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. A p-value was significant when <0.05. Results: Differences in PTV coverage between plans using FB and DIBH were less than 2 %. Maximum liver dose was significantly less using DIBH: 17.5 Gy versus FB: 40.3 Gy (p < 0.001). The volume of the liver receiving 10 % of the dose was significantly less using DIBH with 1.88 cm3 versus 72.2 cm3 under FB (p < 0.001). The absolute volume receiving 20 Gy in the right lung was larger using DIBH: 291 cm3 versus 230 cm3 under FB (p < 0.001) and the relative volume of lung receiving dose greater than 20 Gy was smaller with DIBH: 11.5 % versus 14 % in FB (p = 0.007). The relative electron density of lung was significantly less with DIBH: 0.59 versus 0.62 with FB, (p < 0.001). This suggests that the lung receives less dose due to its lower density when using DIBH. Conclusion: Radiation of the right breast using DIBH spares liver and lung tissue significantly and thus carries the potential of best practice for right sided breast cancer.

Dosimetric Impact of Voluntary Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) in Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Delivery Methods Using Voluntary DIBH and Free Breathing Techniques.

Hodgkin lymphomas are radiosensitive and curable tumors that often involve the mediastinum. However, the application of radiation therapy to the mediastinum is associated with late effects including cardiac and pulmonary toxicities and secondary cancers. The adoption of conformal IMRT and deep inspiration breath- hold (DIBH) can reduce the dose to healthy normal tissues (lungs, heart and breast). We compared the dosimetry of organs at risk (OARs) using different IMRT techniques for two breathing conditions, i.e., deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing. Twenty-three patients with early-stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphomas were accrued in the prospective study. The patients were given treatment plans which utilized full arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (F-VMAT), Butterfly VMAT (B-VMAT), and fixed field IMRT (FF-IMRT) techniques for both DIBH and free breathing methods, respectively. All the plans were optimized to deliver 95% of the prescription dose which was 25.2 Gy to 95% of the PTV volume. The mean dose and standard error of the mean for each OAR, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for the target using the three planning techniques were calculated and compared using Student's t-test for parametric data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-parametric data. The HI and CI of the target was not compromised using the DIBH technique for mediastinal lymphomas. The mean values of CI and HI for both DIBH and FB were comparable. The mean heart doses were reduced by 2.1 Gy, 2.54 Gy, and 2.38 Gy in DIBH compared to FB for the F-VMAT, B-VMAT, and IMRT techniques, respectively. There was a significant reduction in V5Gy, V10Gy, and V15Gy to the heart (p < 0.005) with DIBH. DIBH reduced the mean dose to the total lung by 1.19 Gy, 1.47 Gy, and 1.3 Gy, respectively. Among the 14 female patients, there was a reduction in the mean right breast dose with DIBH compared to FB (4.47 Gy vs. 3.63 Gy, p = 0.004). DIBH results in lower heart, lung, and breast doses than free breathing in mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma. Among the different IMRT techniques, FF-IMRT, B-VMAT, and F-VMAT showed similar PTV coverage, with similar conformity and homogeneity indices. However, the time taken for FF-IMRT was much longer than for the F-VMAT and B-VMAT techniques for both breathing methods. B-VMAT and F-VMAT emerged as the optimal planning techniques able to achieve the best target coverage and lower doses to the OARs, with less time required to deliver the prescribed dose.