RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This review was conducted to systematically assess the impact of bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab, used as anti-resorptive therapies, on the incidence of dental implant failure. METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were performed in accordance with the described search protocol. Only articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected. The primary outcome was implant failure, while secondary outcomes included biological complications and comorbidities. Following data extraction, a quality assessment and meta-analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Fourteen eligible studies were included in the analysis following a qualitative evaluation. BP administration, regardless of the timing of anti-resorptive therapy, did not significantly increase the risk of implant failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-2.34). Subgroup analysis revealed a slightly higher, although statistically insignificant, risk of failure in patients with a follow-up period of 3 years or more compared to those with a follow-up duration of less than 3 years (with ORs of 2.82 and 1.53, respectively). Due to a lack of eligible studies, a meta-analysis for denosumab could not be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that BP treatment does not compromise the survival of dental implants. Specifically, in patients with osteoporosis, implant failure rates were not significantly influenced by the administration of BPs before the placement of dental implants, suggesting that low-dose BP therapy may not contraindicate implant placement. Nevertheless, regular check-ups and maintenance periodontal treatment must not be neglected, and concomitant biological factors should be considered to ensure the long-term success of implant rehabilitation.
RESUMEN
This study investigates the effects of antiresorptive drugs and risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in osteoporotic patients undergoing tooth extraction. Among the findings, antiresorptive-treated patients had thicker lamina dura and longer healing times. Additionally, corticosteroid intake and multi-rooted teeth carried a higher osteonecrosis risk. Bone sequestrum indicated osteonecrosis. PURPOSE: To describe the effects of antiresorptive drugs (ARD) in the maxilla and mandible and risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in osteoporotic patients undergoing tooth extractions using clinical data and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study collected clinical and CBCT data from 176 patients. The study group (n = 78; 224 extractions) received ARD treatment, underwent tooth extraction, and had a pre-operative CBCT. Additionally, age-, sex-, and tooth-matched controls were selected (n = 98; 227 extractions). Radiographic examinations were performed independently by three calibrated examiners. Statistical analysis included Chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U, and t-tests to contrast clinical and radiographic data between study and control, MRONJ + and MRONJ - , and bisphosphonate and denosumab patients/sites. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: From the study group, 4 patients (5%) and 5 sites (2%) developed MRONJ after tooth extraction. ARD-treated patients exhibited significantly more thickening of the lamina dura and a longer average mucosal healing time (4.4 weeks) than controls (2.6 weeks). In the study group, MRONJ risk significantly increased with corticosteroid intake and in multi-rooted teeth. No significant differences between bisphosphonates and denosumab use were seen in the tomographic features (p > 0.05). Lastly, bone sequestrum was exclusively observed in osteoporotic patients, who exhibited post-operative exposed bone or histological evidence of osteonecrosis. CONCLUSION: Osteoporotic patients under ARD may exhibit thickening of the lamina dura and prolonged post-operative healing. Among these patients, multi-rooted teeth are at higher risk for MRONJ than single-rooted teeth. Sequester formation is a radiographic indicator of osteonecrosis.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Osteoporosis , Extracción Dental , Humanos , Femenino , Extracción Dental/efectos adversos , Extracción Dental/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Anciano , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Denosumab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe adverse illness linked to antiresorptive therapies (ART), for which there is no therapeutic gold standard. Many factors can influence MRONJ evolution such as cancer type, treatment, comorbidities, and accumulated dose of ART. The aim of this study was to determine the influencing factors of MRONJ treatments success. METHODS: This retrospective study focused on patients treated for MRONJ in a French tertiary centre. Non-operative therapy was always applied, ART were suspended if appropriate, and surgery (MRONJ removal and musculo-mucosal flap reconstruction) was performed in the absence of contraindication. The evaluation criteria were bone and mucosal healing 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: 81 MRONJ were included; medical treatment alone was administered to 26 % while the remaining 74 % received additional surgery. Therapeutic success reached 86.7 % (52/60) for surgery compared to 42.9 % (9/21) for medical treatment alone (p < 0.001). Age (OR=1.08, p = 0.014) and the absence of infection (OR=5.32, p = 0.042) were in favour of success, while medical treatment alone (OR=0.03, p < 0.001) was highly unfavourable. CONCLUSION: MRONJ healing is influenced by age, non-infectious stages, and surgery. Additional surgery in MRONJ treatment should be advised if the health of the patient permits.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Nonambulatory pediatric patients may have low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of pathologic fractures. Though bisphosphonate therapy is the mainstream medical intervention in these children, clinical data regarding this treatment are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonate therapy in such children. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 21 nonambulatory children (Gross Motor Function Classification System level V) with BMD z-score ≤ -2.0 who were treated with intravenous pamidronate for at least 1 year. These patients received pamidronate every 4 months at a dose of 1.0 to 3.0 mg/kg for each cycle and had regular follow-ups for at least 1 year. The main outcome measures were changes in BMD, risk rate of fracture, biochemical data, and adverse events. RESULTS: The average duration of pamidronate treatment was 2.0±0.9 years, and the mean cumulative dose of pamidronate according to body weight was 7.7±2.5 mg/kg/yr. After treatment, the mean lumbar spine bone mineral content, BMD, and height-for-age-z-score-adjusted BMD z-score (BMDhazZ) significantly improved. The relative risk of fracture after treatment was 0.21 (p=0.0032), suggesting that pamidronate treatment reduced fracture incidence significantly. The increase in the average dose per body weight in each cycle significantly increased the changes in BMDhazZ. CONCLUSION: Pamidronate treatment improved the bone health of nonambulatory children with low bone density without any significant adverse events. Independent of cumulative dosage and duration of treatment, the effectiveness of pamidronate increased significantly with an increase in the average dose per body weight in subsequent cycles.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Tori and exostoses are considered risk factors for the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The aims of this study were to present the prevalence of MRONJ located at tori in the Copenhagen ONJ Cohort, evaluate the surgical treatment of MRONJ located at tori and explore trauma to tori as an additional risk factor in patients on antiresorptive medication. METHODS: Data from a consecutive series of 506 patients with MRONJ (Copenhagen ONJ Cohort) were reviewed for the presence of tori and MRONJ located at tori. Demographic and medical data were analyzed, and healing outcomes and pain after the prophylactic removal of tori, surgical treatment of MRONJ located at tori, and conservative treatment of MRONJ located at tori were evaluated and compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: MRONJ located at tori was frequent and could be identified in 53% of the patients with tori, which accounts for a prevalence of 5.1% in the entire cohort. Of the 28 surgically treated patients, 27 (96.4%) healed uneventfully with no exposed bone after their first or second revision surgery. Fourteen (41.2%) patients with tori underwent therapeutic removal, eight (23.5%) underwent prophylactic removal, and six (17.6%) underwent both therapeutic and prophylactic removals. Two (33.3%) of the six conservatively treated patients healed spontaneously. Both treatment types resulted in a significant decrease in pain. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic and therapeutic surgical removal of tori are reliable treatments and should be considered if a patient's general health allows surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Regional Scientific Ethical Committee (H-6-2013-010) on November 20, 2013, and was retrospectively registered.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Tratamiento Conservador , Humanos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/cirugía , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Exostosis/cirugía , Adulto , DinamarcaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the imaging characteristics of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) using [18F]fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative assessment and to correlate them with microarchitectural and histomorphometric data with respect to clinical findings. METHODS: Twelve patients (five female; mean age 75 ± 7.6 yr) with symptomatic MRONJ underwent both scans on the same day, and imaging findings were used to plan surgical interventions for seven patients. Bone tracer uptake was classified as high, medium, or low, and surgical samples were evaluated using Micro-CT and histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: CT showed medullary sclerosis in all patients, and MRI revealed gadolinium enhancement in four patients. PET imaging revealed remarkably elevated [18F]fluoride uptake and moderately increased [18F]FDG uptake in MRONJ compared to healthy jawbones, with both differences being statistically significant. [18F]fluoride uptake was associated with necrosis, bacteria, and inflammatory tissue. Micro-CT data did not show significant differences, but histomorphometric analysis revealed higher osteocyte and lacunae densities in the high [18F]fluoride uptake group, and more necrotic bone in the medium [18F]fluoride uptake group. Bacteria were observed in all areas. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, [18F]fluoride PET accurately identified MRONJ extent, revealing functional changes in jawbone remodeling not visible on CT. [18F]FDG PET showed differences in bone and soft tissue, though less pronounced. This method aids in evaluating disease activity and guiding treatment planning, requiring further research for optimal surgical approaches based on tracer uptake.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Medication-related ear canal osteonecrosis (MRECO) is a growing concern linked to prolonged anti-resorptive medication use. Despite primary care providers being key prescribers of these medications, there is limited information about MRECO in primary care literature. This article presents a case of bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the external auditory canal (EAC), emphasizing the vital role of primary care providers in identifying this rare yet significant side effect of anti-resorptive medication. MAIN SYMPTOMS AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 65-year-old female, on long-term alendronic acid for osteoporosis, presented to primary care with a 2-year history of left-sided ear blockage and itchiness. Despite prolonged topical treatment for ear wax, symptoms persisted, leading to an Otolaryngology referral. Microsuction revealed exposed bone in the left EAC. DIAGNOSES, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOMES: A computed tomography scan confirmed bony erosion of the left EAC, and in the absence of other osteonecrosis risk factors, bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis was diagnosed. Management involved bisphosphonate discontinuation, regular aural toilet, and topical treatment, achieving complete ear canal epithelialisation within 6 months. CONCLUSION: MRECO, a rare complication of anti-resorptive therapy, is anticipated to rise with increasing antiresorptive medication use in the ageing population. Unexplained ear symptoms in those with a history of current or prior anti-resorptive therapy should raise clinical concern, prompting evaluation for exposed bone in the EAC. Raising awareness of MRECO among primary care providers is crucial for early diagnosis and timely management.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/diagnóstico , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/epidemiología , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Alendronato/efectos adversos , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Technetium-99m (99mTc)-diphosphonates represent the most common radiopharmaceutical used for bone scintigraphy. Even if the uptake in bone tissue has been widely explored, atypical uptake could be seen in soft tissue malignancies during bone scintigraphy. Increased vascularization and endothelium permeability represent front-row players in the biodistribution of the tracer, albeit other causes have been identified such as trauma, necrosis, the presence of calcification in metastasis, the pH of the tissue and consequently the type of ion concentration. CONCLUSION: The aim of this paper is to summarize the state of art of atypical soft tissue uptake seen in cancer tissues. The research was conducted on PubMed. The analysis of the literature suggests that calcium metabolism and ionic saturation have a pivotal role in the biodistribution of bone tracers. This phenomenon ranks in a complex scenario that includes carcinogenesis and cancer environment aspects. We also report two cases in our Institution in which atypical uptake in cancer tissues was observed.
Asunto(s)
Difosfonatos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Cintigrafía , Distribución Tisular , Huesos , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Radiofármacos , Medronato de Tecnecio Tc 99m/metabolismoRESUMEN
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) consists of an area of exposed intraoral or extraoral bone that affects patients with a history of use of antiresorptive and antiangiogenic medications, and who have not undergone head and neck radiotherapy. Leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) is an autologous material of great potential, used as an adjuvant in surgical treatments, especially where healing is compromised. The aim of this article is to report three cases of the use of L-PRF in the prevention of MRONJ in three female Caucasian under bisphosphonates therapy. Patient 1, 86 years old, with osteoporosis, complained of intense pain in tooth 33, which presented edema and periapical lesion and association with MRONJ. Patient 2, 61 years old, undergoing treatment for bone metastases due to breast cancer, reported pain symptoms in tooth 47, as well as suppuration in the dental element, grade I mobility, pain on periapical palpation and radiographically an endoperiodontal lesion was evidenced. Patient 3, 56 years old, also undergoing treatment for breast cancer, presented with severe pain in tooth 36. On clinical examination, she presented pain, mobility and suppuration, and radiographs indicated a furcation lesion on tooth 36. The treatment option in the three cases was the extraction of the affected teeth and the use of L-PRF to promote healing. All patients present a favorable outcome in follow-up. The use of L-PRF can be an adjuvant in the prevention of MRONJ; however, further studies are needed to prove its effectiveness.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical and local radiographic predictors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) by the assessment of pre-operative CBCT images of oncologic patients treated with anti-resorptive drugs (ARDs) undergoing tooth extractions. METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal, case-control study included clinical and imaging data of 97 patients, divided into study and control group. Patients in the study group (n = 47; 87 tooth extractions) had received at least one dose of ARD, undergone tooth extraction(s), and had a pre-operative CBCT. An age-, gender-, and tooth extraction-matched control group (n = 50; 106 tooth extractions) was selected. Three calibrated, blinded, and independent examiners evaluated each tooth extraction site. Statistical analysis used χ2/Fisher's exact/Mann-Whitney U test to contrast control and study group, ARD type used, and sites with or without MRONJ development. p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: From the study group, 15 patients (32%) and 33 sites (38%) developed MRONJ after tooth extraction. When controls were compared to study sites, the latter showed significantly more thickening of the lamina dura, widened periodontal ligament space, osteosclerosis, osteolysis, and sequestrum formation. In the study group, MRONJ risk significantly increased in patients who had multiple tooth extractions, were smokers, and had shorter drug holidays. Periosteal reaction and sequestrum formation may indicate latent MRONJ lesions. Additionally, patients given bisphosphonates showed considerably more osteosclerosis than those given denosumab. CONCLUSIONS: Periosteal reaction and sequestrum formation are suspected to be pre-clinical MRONJ lesions. Furthermore, ARD induced bony changes and radiographic variations between ARD types were seen.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Osteosclerosis , Humanos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Extracción Dental/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia (CFD) may be associated with major cosmetic or functional consequences. However, management recommendations for CFD are currently unavailable. Therefore, this systematic literature review aimed to review the existing approaches for CFD management and propose a management algorithm. The focus question was "What are the different options for CFD treatment and their complication rates?" The MEDLINE database was searched, and 33 articles evaluating a total of 1154 patients were reviewed. The bias assessment showed that 20 of the 33 studies had a high or intermediate risk of bias, mainly because of retrospective data collection and small patient numbers. Radical surgery showed a lower recurrence rate than debulking, but its use should be weighed against the morbidity caused by the reconstruction performed in this technique. Orbital decompression using a radical technique or debulking is effective in cases showing exophthalmos or dystopia. Surveillance is a viable option for asymptomatic and/or non-progressive lesions. In cases showing optic nerve compression, prophylactic decompression should be avoided, and decompression should be performed only when patients show diminished visual acuity or visual field defect. Although bisphosphonates have shown efficacy in pain management, their posology requires further discussion. A management algorithm is presented.
Asunto(s)
Displasia Fibrosa Craneofacial , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico , Humanos , Displasia Fibrosa Craneofacial/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Cara/cirugía , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/cirugíaRESUMEN
As the aging population increases, the number of patients with osteoporosis is gradually rising. Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mass and the microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, resulting in reduced bone strength and an increased risk of low-energy or fragility fractures. Thus, the use of anti-resorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates (BPs), to prevent osteoporotic fractures is growing annually. BPs are effective in reducing hip and other fractures. However, the longer a patient takes BPs, the higher the risk of an atypical femoral fracture (AFF). The exact mechanism by which long-term BP use affects the development of AFFs has not yet been clarified. However, several theories have been suggested to explain the pathogenesis of AFFs, such as suppressed bone remodeling, impaired bone healing, altered bone quality, and femoral morphology. The management of AFFs requires both medical and surgical approaches. BPs therapy should be discontinued immediately, and calcium and vitamin D levels should be evaluated and supplemented if insufficient. Teriparatide can be used for AFFs. Intramedullary nailing is the primary treatment for complete AFFs, and prophylactic femoral nailing is recommended if signs of an impending fracture are detected.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonate (BF) therapy is strongly related to the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). However, no previous study has evaluated if there are sex-related differences on the ONJ establishment together with bone biomechanical alterations, and if they could have a synergy with the ZA treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study aimed to analyze the physicochemical properties of mineralized tissues in a zoledronate (ZA)-related osteonecrosis mouse model, by a 2 × 2-factorial design, considering sex (female/male) and treatment (ZA/Saline) factors (n = 8/group). After three ZA (1.0 mg/kg) or saline administrations (days 0, 7, 14), the lower left second molar was extracted (day 42). Further ZA administration (day 49) and euthanasia (day 70) were conducted. After confirmation of ZA-induced jaw necrosis (histologic and microtomographic analysis), spectroscopic and mechanical parameters were assessed. RESULTS: ZA-treated groups presented lower bone density due to impaired healing of tooth extraction socket. Sex-related alterations were also observed, with lower bone density in females. Regarding biomechanical parameters, sex and treatment exerted independent influences. ZA, although decreasing flexural modulus and yield stress, increases stiffness mainly due to a higher bone volume. Females show less resistance to higher loads compared to males (considering dimension-independent parameters). Additionally, ZA increases crystallinity in bone and dental structure (p < 0.05). In summary, although strongly related to osteonecrosis occurrence, ZA modifies bone and dental mineral matrix, improving bone mechanical properties. CONCLUSION: Despite sex-dependent differences in bone biomechanics and density, osteonecrosis was established with no sex influence. No synergistic association between sex and treatment factors was observed in this study.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Ratones , Animales , Masculino , Femenino , Ácido Zoledrónico/farmacología , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/patología , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Alveolo Dental , Densidad Ósea , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Objetivo: Este trabalho tem como propósito fornecer uma análise abrangente das características clínicas, etiológicas, radiográficas e histopatológicas da osteonecrose dos maxilares relacionada ao uso de medicamentos, além de abordar os métodos de diagnóstico, prevenção e estratégias terapêuticas. Materiais e métodos: foi realizada uma busca por artigos científicos publicados no período de 2015 a 2023, utilizando as bases de dados Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) e ScienceDirect. Conclusão: Embora infrequente, há um considerável potencial de ocorrência de osteonecrose dos maxilares em pacientes submetidos a terapia prolongada com medicamentos antirreabsortivos e antiangiogênicos, especialmente quando não são adotadas medidas preventivas adequadas. A implementação de práticas preventivas, a vigilância das condições bucais e a colaboração de uma equipe multidisciplinar são fundamentais para reduzir os riscos associados a essa condição patológica.(AU)
Objective: This work aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the clinical, etiological, radiographic and histopathological characteristics of Medication-Related Jaw Osteonecrosis, in addition to addressing diagnostic methods, prevention and therapeutic strategies. Materials and methods: A search was carried out for scientific articles published between 2015 and 2023, using the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and ScienceDirect databases. Conclusion: Although infrequent, there is a considerable potential for osteonecrosis of the jaw to occur in patients undergoing prolonged therapy with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic medications, especially when adequate preventive measures are not adopted. The implementation of preventive practices, surveillance of oral conditions and the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team are essential to reduce the risks associated with this pathological condition.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Osteonecrosis/inducido químicamente , Osteonecrosis/terapia , Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/terapia , Denosumab/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This 6-month randomized split-mouth and placebo-controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic efficacy of adjunctive use of 0.05% zoledronate (ZLN) gel as local drug delivery to scaling and root planing (SRP) in stage III, grade B periodontitis patients with and without controlled type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: A total of 120 infrabony sites were divided into two groups: Group-1 (non-diabetic periodontitis) and Group-2 (periodontitis + DM). A total of 60 sites in each group were randomized to receive treatment with SRP + placebo gel (control) or SRP + 0.05% ZLN gel (test). Plaque index (PI), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment levels (RAL) were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and digital intraoral periapical and cone-beam computed tomography imaging were used to measure the linear and percentage reduction of intrabony defect depth (DD, DDR%) after 6 months. RESULTS: Group-1 showed significant reduction in PI (0.56 ± 0.15 and 0.52 ± 0.19 from 0.67 ± 0.17), mSBI (0.7 ± 0.60 and 0.47 ± 0.57 from 0.9 ± 0.48), PPD (4.6 ± 0.85 and 3.43 ± 0.63 from 6.5 ± 1.04) and gain in RAL (7.03 ± 0.85 and 5.93 ± 0.69 from 8.9 ± 1.09) in the ZLN-treated sites than the placebo sites and also from Group-2 sites after 3 and 6 months, respectively. A significant reduction in DD of 28.79% in Group-1 and 22.20% in Group-2 at ZLN sites was seen compared to placebo sites of both groups. CONCLUSION: ZLN gel applied subgingivally in infrabony pockets resulted in significant clinical improvements evident by probing depth reduction and gain in attachment levels along with radiographic evidence of more bone fill seen in non-diabetic patients compared to diabetic periodontitis patients.
RESUMEN
The increase in life expectancy of the world population has led to a concomitant increase in the prevalence of multiple myeloma (MM), a disease that usually affects the elderly population. Bone lesions are frequent in patients with this condition, demanding an early approach, from drug treatment, through radiotherapy to orthopedic surgery (prophylactic or therapeutic) with the objective of preventing or delaying the occurrence of fracture, or, when this event has already occurred, treat it through stabilization or replacement (lesions located in the appendicular skeleton) and/or promote stabilization and spinal cord decompression (lesions located in the axial skeleton), providing rapid pain relief, return to ambulation and resocialization, returning quality of life to patients. The aim of this review is to update the reader on the findings of pathophysiology, clinical, laboratory and imaging, differential diagnosis and therapeutic approach of multiple myeloma bone disease (MMBD).
RESUMEN
PRESERVING THE ORAL HEALTH OF PATIENTS ON ANTIRESORPTIVE DRUGS. For many years, antiresorptive medication have proven their effectiveness in reducing the risk of pathological fractures in osteoporotic or tumoral bone. However, bisphosphonates and denosumab may, in rare cases, induce osteonecrosis of the jaw, especially when prescribed for malignant disease (bone metastases or multiple myeloma). The presence of oral infections and the performance of invasive procedures, particularly dental avulsions, increase the risk of this complication. The management of osteonecrosis of the jaw is complex, and the prescribing physician and the dental surgeon must implement preventive measures. There are numerous recommendations published by national and international scientific societies that guide practitioners in the oral management of these patients. An oral check-up and oral cavity restoration are strongly recommended before treatment, as well as the implementation of rigorous oral hygiene and regular visits to the dental surgeon. During and after treatment with antiresorptive medication, oral care protocols are used to reduce the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaws and, when it occurs, to manage it.
PRÉSERVER LA SANTÉ ORALE DES PATIENTS SOUS ANTIRÉSORBEURS OSSEUX. Depuis de nombreuses années, les antirésorbeurs osseux ont prouvé leur efficacité dans la diminution du risque de fracture pathologique sur os ostéoporotique ou tumoral. Parmi eux, les bisphosphonates et le dénosumab sont cependant susceptibles d'induire, dans de rares cas, une ostéonécrose des maxillaires, notamment lorsqu'ils sont prescrits pour une pathologie maligne (métastases osseuses ou myélome multiple). La présence de foyers infectieux bucco- dentaires et la réalisation de gestes invasifs, notamment des avulsions dentaires, augmentent le risque de cette complication. La prise en charge de l'ostéonécrose des maxillaires étant complexe, le médecin prescripteur et le chirurgien-dentiste doivent mettre en place des mesures préventives. Il existe de nombreuses recommandations éditées par des sociétés scientifiques nationales et internationales qui guident les praticiens dans la prise en charge bucco- dentaire de ces patients. Un bilan bucco-dentaire et une remise en état de la cavité buccale sont fortement recommandés avant la mise en place du traitement, ainsi que l'instauration d'une hygiène orale rigoureuse et de consultations régulières chez le chirurgien-dentiste. Pendant et après le traitement par antirésorbeurs osseux, des protocoles de soins bucco-dentaires permettent de diminuer le risque d'ostéonécrose des maxillaires et, lorsqu'elle survient, de la prendre en charge.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Neoplasias Óseas , Humanos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/etiología , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/prevención & control , Salud Bucal , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundarioRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Dental implants are a common solution for edentulous patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether locally delivered diphosphonates influence the osseointegration of dental implants in humans. MATERIAL & METHODS: In March 2023, we conducted an electronic systematic literature search using three databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science). We included randomized trials documenting locally delivered diphosphonates in partly edentulous patients. Two independent reviewers evaluated study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed study quality. RESULTS: We have identified 752 studies, out of which 7 studies involving 154 patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall meta-analysis indicates that diphosphonates are associated with marginal bone loss during the pre-loading period (mean difference (MD) of -0.18 mm, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.12, p<0.00001; I²=83%), marginal bone loss after one year (MD -0.35 mm, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.14, p = 0.0009; I²=14%), and five years loading (MD -0.34 mm, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.13, p = 0.002; I²=0%). However, the drug did not seem to affect the implant survival rate (risk ratios (RR) of 1.02, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.08, P = 0.33; I²=9%). DISCUSSION: This study suggests that local use of diphosphonates does not affect implant survival, but it does reduce marginal bone loss and improve the osseointegration of dental implants in humans. However, future research must be more standardized and address methodological biases to draw more conclusive findings.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Boca Edéntula , Humanos , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Fracaso de la Restauración Dental , OseointegraciónRESUMEN
Introducción: dada la alta prescripción de bifosfonatos, presentamos sus efectos adversos en la esfera odontológica, siendo una complicación poco frecuente, pero de difícil tratamiento. Sin necesidad de suspender el tratamiento, dado el importante beneficio en cuanto a la prevención de fractura por fragilidad. Estas fracturas causan una alta morbimortalidad en contraposición al bajo riesgo que conlleva la Osteonecrosis mandibular asociada a bifosfonatos. Objetivo: orientar al personal de salud que maneja estos fármacos y quien asiste dichas complicaciones a poseer conocimientos para la prevención de osteonecrosis. Identificar y diferenciar los pacientes con mayor riesgo, de acuerdo con la dosis de bifosfonatos y la frecuencia del tratamiento. Materiales y Método: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en las siguientes fuentes: Scielo, Google académico, Medline/Pubmed, Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (Brasil), desde el año 2005 a la fecha, idiomas español, portugués e inglés. Los descriptores utilizados son bifosfonatos, mandíbula, maxilar, odontología, osteonecrosis, osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a bifosfonatos. Resultados: las últimas pautas de tratamiento fueron modificadas en 2014, por consenso de la Asociación Americana de cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial. La patogénesis de la osteonecrosis maxilar asociada a bifosfonatos no está completamente definida, aunque las publicaciones tratan de explicarla. El riesgo de desarrollarla por terapia oral es menor que por su administración vía intravenosa. Discusión: el médico que prescribe el antirresortivo debe conocer el estado de salud dental de su paciente y, en lo posible, remitirlo a examen con el odontólogo antes de iniciar la terapia con bifosfonatos.
Introduction: Given the high prescription of bisphosphonates, we present their adverse effects in the dental sphere, being an infrequent complication, but difficult to treat. There is no need to suspend treatment, given the important benefit in terms of prevention of fragility fractures. These fractures cause high morbimortality as opposed to the low risk associated with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw. Objective: To orient the health personnel who handle these drugs and who assist these complications to have knowledge for the prevention of osteonecrosis. To identify and differentiate patients at higher risk, according to the dose of bisphosphonates and frequency of treatment. Materials and Method: A literature review was performed in the following sources: Scielo, Google academic, Medline/Pubmed, Virtual Health Library (Brazil), from 2005 to date, Spanish, Portuguese and English languages. The descriptors used were bisphosphonates, mandible, maxilla, dentistry, osteonecrosis, osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with bisphosphonates. Results: The latest treatment guidelines were modified in 2014, by consensus of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The pathogenesis of bisphosphonate-associated maxillary osteonecrosis is not completely defined, although publications try to explain it. The risk of developing it by oral therapy is lower than by intravenous administration. Discussion: The physician who prescribes the antiresorptive drug should know the dental health status of his patient and, if possible, refer him for examination by a dentist before initiating bisphosphonate therapy.
Introdução: dada a alta prescrição de bisfosfonatos, apresentamos seus efeitos adversos na esfera odontológica, uma complicação rara, mas de difícil tratamento. Sem a necessidade de suspender o tratamento, dado o importante benefício em termos de prevenção de fraturas por fragilidade. Essas fraturas causam alta morbidade e mortalidade, em contraste com o baixo risco associado à osteonecrose da mandíbula associada aos bisfosfonatos. Objetivo: orientar a equipe de saúde que manipula esses medicamentos e que atende a essas complicações para que tenham conhecimento sobre a prevenção da osteonecrose. Identificar e diferenciar os pacientes de maior risco, de acordo com a dose de bisfosfonatos e a frequência do tratamento. Materiais e Método: foi realizada uma revisão da literatura nas seguintes fontes: Scielo, Google acadêmico, Medline/Pubmed, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Brasil), de 2005 até a presente data, idiomas espanhol, português e inglês. Os descritores utilizados foram: bisfosfonatos, mandíbula, maxila, odontologia, osteonecrose, osteonecrose dos maxilares associada a bisfosfonatos. Resultados: as diretrizes de tratamento mais recentes foram modificadas em 2014, por consenso da Associação Americana de Cirurgia Oral e Maxilofacial. A patogênese da osteonecrose da mandíbula associada a bisfosfonatos não está totalmente definida, embora a literatura tente explicá-la. O risco de desenvolvê-la com a terapia oral é menor do que com a administração intravenosa. Discussão: o médico que prescreve o medicamento deve estar ciente do estado de saúde bucal do paciente e, se possível, encaminhar o paciente para ser examinado por um dentista antes de iniciar a terapia com bisfosfonatos.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/etiología , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Abstract The increase in life expectancy of the world population has led to a concomitant increase in the prevalence of multiple myeloma (MM), a disease that usually affects the elderly population. Bone lesions are frequent in patients with this condition, demanding an early approach, from drug treatment, through radiotherapy to orthopedic surgery (prophylactic or therapeutic) with the objective of preventing or delaying the occurrence of fracture, or, when this event has already occurred, treat it through stabilization or replacement (lesions located in the appendicular skeleton) and/or promote stabilization and spinal cord decompression (lesions located in the axial skeleton), providing rapid pain relief, return to ambulation and resocialization, returning quality of life to patients. The aim of this review isto update the reader on the findings of pathophysiology, clinical, laboratory and imaging, differential diagnosis and therapeutic approach of multiple myeloma multiple myeloma bone disease (MMBD).
Resumo O aumento da expectativa devida da população mundial levou a incremento concomitante na prevalência de mieloma múltiplo (MM), patologia que geralmente afeta a população idosa. Lesões ósseas são frequentes nos portadores desta condição, demandando abordagem precoce, desde o tratamento medicamentoso, passando pela radioterapia até a cirurgia ortopédica (profilática ou terapêutica) com os objetivos de prevenir ou retardar a ocorrência de fratura, ou, quando este evento já ocorreu, tratá-la mediante estabilização ou substituição (lesões situadas no esqueleto apendicular) e/ou promover estabilização e descompressão medular (lesões situadas no esqueleto axial), proporcionando rápido alívio da dor, retorno à deambulação e ressocialização, devolvendo a qualidade de vida aos pacientes. O objetivo desta revisão é atualizar o leitor sobre a fisiopatologia, a clínica, exames laboratoriais e de imagem, diagnóstico diferencial e abordagem terapêutica da doença óssea no mieloma múltiplo (DOMM).