Is DEB-TACE as locoregional therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma effective?

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as locoregional therapy (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) beyond Hangzhou criteria (HC) and to analyze the prognostic factors. METHODS: Forty patients with HCC beyond HC who received DEB-TACE only before LT were retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and December 2022. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment response, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with RFS and OS. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent LT following DEB-TACE with a mean interval of 2.3 months. The objective response rates (ORRs) for these patients following DEB-TACE was 82.5%. The primary AE was post-embolization syndrome (PES), with affected patients experiencing grades I and II. The median RFS and OS were 12.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-30.1) and 52.0 months (95%CI: 11.8-92.2) over the follow-up period until December 2022. The 2-year RFS and OS rates were 42.5%, and 67.5%. Multivariate analyses revealed Child-Pugh classification (HR = 6.24; 95%CI,1.83-21.24; P = 0.01) and macrovascular invasion (MAV) (HR = 3.89; 95%CI,1.07-14.15; P = 0.04) were both significant independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: DEB-TACE can serve as a safe and effective LRT in HCC patients beyond HC before LT, and can improve the prognosis of patients, especially without MAV. The higher Child-Pugh classification and MAV are independent prognostic factors after LT.

Pingyangmycin-loaded drug-eluting beads transarterial embolisation for giant cavernous haemangioma of the liver: A case report.

Purpose: Cavernous haemangioma of the liver (CHL) is the most common venous malformation of the liver. Surgical resection is considered the gold standard for large symptomatic haemangiomas. Transarterial embolisation has demonstrated acceptable efficacy with lower rates of morbidity and mortality. We report the first case of a 59-year-old man with a giant CHL treated using pingyangmycin drug-eluting bead transarterial embolisation (DEB-TACE). Material and methods: A 59-year-old man presented to our hospital with cough and sputum, most probably related to the mass effect of the haemangioma and secondary lung collapse. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 187.5 mm × 142.7 mm cavernous haemangioma located in the right lobe of the liver. He underwent DEB-TACE, and a 2.6-F microcatheter was used to selectively catheterise the right hepatic artery. One vial of 300-500-µm CalliSpheres microspheres loaded with 8-mg pingyangmycin and two vials of 100-300-µm microspheres were injected through the microcatheter until the disappearance of CHL staining. Results: The patient experienced mild abdominal pain on the second day after embolisation. A reduction in CHL size to 106.7 × 141.3 mm was observed on the 1.1-month follow-up CT. We performed a second similar DEB-TACE, which resulted in further size reduction to 83.1 × 50.1 mm, as detected on the follow-up CT at 4.6 months. At the 8.7-month follow-up, his clinical symptoms improved with no cough or sputum and the CHL size further reduced to 63.2 × 55.8 mm. Conclusion: We report the first case of a giant CHL treated using DEB-TACE. Although DEB-TACE may be an effective and safe alternative for treating of giant CHL, an in vitro study on the efficient loading and binding of pingyangmycin with microspheres and more comparative studies with larger samples are required to further confirm its safety and efficacy.

Comparison of Chemoembolization Outcomes Using 70-150 µm and 100-300 µm Drug-Eluting Beads in Treating Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) according to the size of the beads for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 212 patients with a single HCC ≤5 cm from five tertiary institutions. One hundred and nine patients were treated with 70-150-µm doxorubicin DEBs (group A), and 103 patients received 100-300-µm doxorubicin DEBs (group B). The initial tumor response (assessed between 3 weeks and 2 months after DEB-TACE), time to local tumor progression (TTLTP), restricted mean duration of complete response (RMDCR), rate of complications, incidence of post-embolization syndrome, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze prognostic factors for initial tumor response. RESULTS: The initial objective response rates were 91.7% (100/109) and 84.5% (87/103) for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.101). In the subgroup analysis of tumors ≤3 cm, the initial objective response rates were 94.6% (53/56) and 78.0% (39/50) for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the TTLTP (median, 23.7 months for group A vs. 19.0 months for group B; P = 0.278 [log-rank], 0.190 [multivariable Cox regression]) or RMDCR at 24 months (11.4 months vs. 8.5 months, respectively; P = 0.088). In the subgroup analysis of tumors >3-cm, the RMDCR at 24 months was significantly longer in group A than in group B (11.8 months vs. 5.7 months, P = 0.024). The incidence of mild bile duct dilatation after DEB-TACE was significantly higher in group B than in group A (5.5% [6/109] vs. 18.4% [19/103], P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE using 70-150-µm microspheres demonstrated a higher initial objective response rate in ≤3-cm HCCs and a longer RMDCR at 24 months in 3.1-5-cm HCCs compared to larger DEBs (100-300-µm).

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as neoadjuvant therapy pre-liver transplantation for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as neoadjuvant therapy before liver transplantation (LT) for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to analyze the prognostic factors. AIM: To determine whether DEB-TACE before LT is superior to LT for advanced-stage HCC. METHODS: A total of 99 individuals diagnosed with advanced HCC were studied retrospectively. The participants were categorized into the following two groups based on whether they had received DEB-TACE before LT: DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and control group (n = 54). The participants were further divided into two subgroups based on the presence or absence of segmental portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The DEB-TACE group consisted of two subgroups: Group A (n = 31) without PVTT and group B (n = 14) with PVTT. The control group also had two subgroups: Group C (n = 37) without PVTT and group D (n = 17) with PVTT. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, therapy response, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the parameters that were independently related to OS and RFS. RESULTS: The DEB-TACE group exhibited an overall response rate of 86.6%. Following therapy, there was a significant decrease in the median alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (275.1 ng/mL vs 41.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001). The main AE was post-embolization syndrome. The 2-year rates of RFS and OS were significantly higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the control group (68.9% vs 38.9%, P = 0.003; 86.7% vs 63.0%, P = 0.008). Within the subgroups, group A had higher 2-year rates of RFS and OS compared to group C (71.0% vs 45.9%, P = 0.038; 83.8% vs 62.2%, P = 0.047). The 2-year RFS rate of group B was markedly superior to that of group D (64.3% vs 23.5%, P = 0.002). Results from multivariate analyses showed that pre-LT DEB-TACE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-5.14, P = 0.04], overall target tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm (HR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.05-3.75, P = 0.035), and AFP level ≤ 400 ng/mL (HR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.30-4.19, P = 0.009) were significant risk factors for RFS. Additionally, pre-LT DEB-TACE (HR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.43-6.96, P = 0.004) was identified as a significant risk factor for OS. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE is a safe and efficient therapy for advanced-stage HCC and also enhances patient survival after LT.

Arterial-Portal Venous Shunt after Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Risk factors and Impact on Patient Survival.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been well established. The differential impacts of drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) as opposed to conventional TACE (cTACE) on vascular changes, such as arterial-portal venous shunts (APSs), have been recognized. However, their subsequent effects on treatment outcomes have not been fully explored. This study aims to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of APS in HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE and to evaluate its impact on patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2012 to December 2018 including 74 HCC patients receiving DEB-TACE as initial treatment and a 1:1 cTACE. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression identified significant risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE. RESULTS: APS incidence was significantly higher after DEB-TACE than cTACE (46.0% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in median OS between APS and non-APS groups after DEB-TACE: 50 months (24.6-75.4) versus 26.9 months (19.5-43.2), p = 0.111; median PFS was 15.6 months (4.1-27.1) and 9.5 months (6.8-12.1) for the two groups, respectively, p = 0.065. Risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE were more than two feeding arteries (OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 1.82-28.95, p = 0.005) and non-selective embolization (OR: 8.02, 95% CI: 2.30-27.95, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: APS occurrence was higher in DEB-TACE-treated HCC patients, but it did not significantly affect OS and PFS. More than two feeding arteries and non-selective embolization were significant risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE.

Liver abscess after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatic malignant tumors: Clinical features, pathogenesis, and management.

AIM: The study aimed to investigate the clinical features, incidence, pathogenesis, and management of liver abscess after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for primary and metastatic hepatic malignant tumors. METHODS: From June 2019 to June 2021, patients with liver abscess after DEB-TACE for primary and metastatic hepatic malignant tumors were reviewed and evaluated at our hospital. Demographic and clinical data, radiological findings, management approaches, and prognosis were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 419 DEB-TACE procedures were carried out in 314 patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors at our medical center. Twelve patients were confirmed to have liver abscesses after DEB-TACE through clinical manifestations, laboratory investigations, and imaging. In this study, the incidence of liver abscess was 3.82% per patient and 2.86% per DEB-TACE procedure. After percutaneous drainage and anti-inflammatory treatments, 10 patients recovered, and the remaining 2 patients died due to direct complications of liver abscess, such as sepsis and multiple organ failure. The mortality rate of liver abscesses after DEB-TACE was 16.7% (2/12). CONCLUSION: The incidence of liver abscess after DEB-TACE is relatively high and can have serious consequences, including death. Potential risk factors could include large tumor size, history of bile duct or tumor resection, history of diabetes, small DEB size (100-300 µm). Sensitive antibiotics therapy and percutaneous abscess aspiration/drainage are effective treatments for liver abscess after DEB-TACE.

Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads combined with systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRCLM). Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) is considered an effective treatment option for CRCLM. Few studies have investigated the combination of DEB-TACE, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy for CRCLM. In the present study, we evaluated the disease control rate (DCR), adverse events, and survival among patients with CRCLM who underwent the combination of DEB-TACE and chemotherapy/targeted therapy. MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with CRCLM who were treated between January 2015 and January 2021. Standard systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and 66 DEB-TACE procedures were administered. Data were collected on each DEB-TACE procedure, including chemotherapy agents, tumor burden of liver metastasis, number of DEB-TACE courses, and adverse events. Patients who received DEB-TACE after failure of first-line systemic therapy were categorized into the first-line failure group. Patients who received DEB-TACE after the failure of second-line, third-line, or fourth-line therapy were categorized into the other group. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 35 patients with CRCLM (34 patients with adenocarcinoma and 1 patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma) were enrolled. In total, 13 patients (37.1%) had extrahepatic metastases at initial diagnosis. In this study, 66 DEB-TACE procedures were performed. The DCR was 54.3%. The median OS period was 47.4 months, and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 59.5%. The median PFS period was 6.3 months, and the estimated 1-year PFS rate was 20.6%. The PFS period was longer in the first-line failure group than in the other group (7.2 vs. 6.3 months). No significant difference was observed in OS between the two groups. Four episodes (6.1%) of grade 3 intra-abdominal infection were observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and DEB-TACE can lead to a favorable DCR and survival outcomes in patients with CRCLM. Early intervention with DEB-TACE (i.e., after the failure of first-line therapy) has the potential to extend the PFS period in patients with CRCLM. Severe adverse events were rare and manageable. Further prospective, randomized controlled studies are warranted to obtain more conclusive findings.

Analysis of prognostic factors in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer complicated by hemorrhage treated by drug-eluting bead embolization.

Background: Transcatheter bladder arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an alternative treatment used to control bladder cancer (BC) with bleeding, especially in older adult patients with comorbidities. This retrospective observational study evaluated the effect and prognostic factors of transcatheter drug-eluting bead (DEB) embolization in patients with advanced BC. Methods: We assessed 39 patients diagnosed with BC with hemorrhage who were either inoperable or unwilling to undergo surgery at our hospital between January 2018 and October 2022. All patients underwent TACE by DEB loaded with epirubicin and imaging scans after 2 months to evaluate the curative effect according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) standard to determine treatment. Re-examination and follow-up were performed every 3-6 months to observe hematuria recurrence and the curative effect. Results: A total of 95 interventional treatments were performed in 39 patients, and all participants achieved complete hemostasis within 5 days after the first intervention. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging showed that the total effective rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] was 64.1%, and the disease benefit rate (CR +PR + stable disease) was 79.5%. A total of 30 patients (76.9%) had no hematuria recurrence. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the type of blood supply in BC may relate to whether the patients benefited from the intervention. Hematuria recurrence was significantly associated with the total number of tumors and the type of blood supply (P<0.05). Conclusions: Superselective embolization of bladder arteries with DEB can be used to treat BC with hemorrhage. However, hypovascular tumor blood supply may result in poor postoperative efficacy and hematuria recurrence. Additionally, multiple bladder tumors may be a risk factor for hematuria recurrence.

Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Radiofrequency Ablation as an Initial Treatment of Single Small (≤ 3 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term therapeutic outcomes of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the initial treatment of a single small (≤ 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2021, 259 consecutive patients who underwent DEB-TACE (67 patients) or RFA (192 patients) as a first-line treatment for a single small HCC were enrolled in this retrospective study. The therapeutic outcomes, including cumulative intrahepatic local tumor progression (LTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and long-term overall survival (OS) rates, were compared between the two groups before and after propensity score (PS) matching. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognostic factors and differences in OS and PFS between the two groups for all 92 patients after PS matching. RESULTS: After PS matching, the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year LTP rates were lower in the RFA group than those in the DEB-TACE group (P < 0.001), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates in the RFA group were higher than those in the DEB-TACE group (P = 0.007). However, the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were not significantly different between the RFA and DEB-TACE groups (P = 0.584). Moreover, the OS was not significantly different between the RFA and DEB-TACE groups in the univariate and multivariate analyses, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81. The PFS was significantly higher in the RFA group than that in the DEB-TACE group in the univariate analyses, with a HR of 0.44 (P = 0.009). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that albumin (P = 0.019) was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Additionally, the major complication rates were not significantly different between the DEB-TACE and RFA groups (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: The LTP and PFS rates of RFA were superior to those of DEB-TACE in the initial treatment of single small HCC after PS matching. However, the OS rates were not significantly different between RFA and DEB-TACE. Therefore, DEB-TACE may be considered an efficient substitute for RFA in some patients with a single small HCC who are ineligible for RFA.

Neoadjuvant drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization and tislelizumab therapy for resectable or borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: High rate of recurrence impaired the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery. We aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) and tislelizumab therapy for resectable or borderline resectable HCC. METHODS: 41 HCC patients received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were respectively enrolled. The safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant therapy were assessed. The prognosis was evaluated and compared with that of 41 matched HCC patients who received surgery alone. RESULTS: 36 (87.8%) patients had adverse events (AEs) and only one patient had a grade 3/4 of ALT elevated. All patients performed surgery successfully and no severe postoperative complications occurred. The objective response rate (ORR) was 56.1% and 87.8% based on RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively. 15 (36.6%) patients had radiological complete tumor necrosis and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) was 13 (31.7%) and 18 (43.9%), respectively. The incidence of microvascular invasion (MVI) was 4.9% in neoadjuvant therapy patients, compared with 64.9% before propensity score matching (PSM) and 60.9% after PSM for surgery alone patients. Neoadjuvant therapy patients had a significant better prognosis than surgery alone patients (recurrence-free survival p = 0.041, overall survival p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest the neoadjuvant D-TACE and tislelizumab therapy is safe and benefit to the pathological results and prognosis for patients with resectable or borderline resectable HCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization with DC Beads LUMI in the Treatment of HCC: Experience from a Tertiary Centre.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy profiles of TACE using DC Beads LUMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients with HCC who underwent TACE with DC Bead LUMI™ between November 2018 and November 2020 at Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Policlinico Hospital in Milan, Italy. Patient- and tumour-related factors were registered, including the number of treated lesions, dose of DC Beads LUMI™, dose of Epirubicin, DC Beads LUMI™ target tumour coverage (LC) according to the percentage of target nodule involvement (LC1-0%-25%, LC2-25%-50%, LC3-50%-75%, LC4 75%-100%). Treatment efficacy was obtained through reviewing the follow-up imaging for evidence of response in target lesion(s), according to modified response criteria in solid tumours (mRECIST) criteria with the following outcomes: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Safety assessment was based on the quantitative and qualitative recording of the adverse events, classified according to CIRSE classification. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 95 procedures were carried out. We observed a target tumour response rate at 1 month with CR in 68%, PR in 10.3% 11.8%, SD in 13%, PD in 7.2%, and an overall tumour(s) (whole liver) response at 1 month with CR in 58.9%, PR in 12.6%, SD in 10.5% and PD in 18%. We found a significant association (p < 0.01) between tumour response CR or CR + PR and the number of the target lesion(s). CIRSE classification grade I and grade II complications were recorded, respectively, in 11 (11.6%) and 6 (6.3%) procedures. No grade III-IV-V complications occurred. CONCLUSION: TACE using DC Beads LUMI is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with HCC.

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (cTACE) and Drug-Eluting Bead (DEB)-TACE in the Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the preferred loco-regional treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to resection due to its distinctive blend of precise drug administration, localized tumor management, and reduced systemic adverse effects, setting it apart from the plethora of alternative treatments available. There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal choice for managing HCC using TACE, particularly between its two major types: conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE). The medical community remains divided on which approach offers superior safety and efficacy, with conflicting evidence and varied outcomes adding to the complexity of this nuanced decision. Given the lack of consensus surrounding the preferred TACE technique in treatment-naive patients for HCC, we conducted a rigorous systematic review to assess and contrast the relative safety and efficacy of cTACE versus DEB-TACE in patients diagnosed with HCC who did not receive any prior treatment for HCC. Our study aimed to provide much-needed clarity on this controversial topic, shedding light on the two approaches' comparative safety and efficacy to inform clinical decision-making. After a comprehensive search of databases and search engines and through a methodical screening process, including standardized quality assessments and relevant filter application based on our eligibility criteria, we identified 10 articles pertinent to our research query comprising two randomized controlled trials, one meta-analysis, and seven observational studies. The collective sample size of the studies was 5,288 patients with HCC, of which 2,959 were in the cTACE arm and 2,324 were in the DEB-TACE arm.

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib and Anti-PD-1 Antibodies for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background: Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has good efficacy in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), with a relatively high objective response rate (ORR) compared to conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and medium-term clinical efficacy of DEB-TACE combined with lenvatinib (LEN) plus PD-1 inhibitors as a triple therapy for the treatment of uHCC. Methods: Data of patients with uHCC who received triple therapy of DEB-TACE combined with LEN plus PD-1 inhibitors from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The study endpoints were ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Results: Thirty-five patients were included in this study, with a median follow-up period of 15 months. The median cycle of DEB-TACE was 1, while that of all forms of TACE procedures per patient was 2. The median administration time of LEN was 7 months, and the median number of PD-1 inhibitor treatment was 4 cycles. The ORR based on mRECIST was 82.9%, disease control rate was 91.4%, and the median time to response was 7 weeks. Among these, the ORR of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A reached 100%, while that of BCLC stages B and C reached 84.6% and 78.9%, respectively. The median PFS was 9 months; the mOS was not reached. Fourteen patients (40%) successfully underwent downstaging conversion and surgical resection, 32 patients (91.4%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, and no grade 5-related adverse reactions occurred. Conclusion: DEB-TACE combined with LEN and PD-1 inhibitors has a high ORR and surgical conversion rate in the treatment of uHCC tumors, and the toxicity and side effects were tolerable.

Correlation between magnetic resonance images of peritumor margin enhancement and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the morphological characteristics and clinical significance of magnetic resonance (MR) images of peritumor margin enhancement in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE). Methods: From January 2017 to December 2020, a total of 162 patients who received a diagnosis of HCC were included in our study. We began the follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for complete response assessment, and peritumor margin enhancements were classified as sharp and rough types according to morphology. During the follow-up, data such as progression or remission of the two enhancement modalities, morphological changes in terms of margin enhancements observed in MR images, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were recorded. Results: In the follow-up period of 36 months, 70 and 92 patients with sharp- and rough-type peritumor margins, respectively, were observed. At the end of the follow-up, patients with sharp-type margins had lower AFP levels and longer progression-free survival than those with rough-type margins (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the sharp-type margin was thinner than the rough-type margin (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the sharp-type group had a high incidence of tumors with a diameter of < 5 cm, whereas the rough-type group had a high incidence of tumors with a diameter of ≥ 5 cm. Continuous enhancements of peritumor margins in MRI were greater in the sharp-type group than in the rough-type group. Most of the patients with a sharp-type margin achieved disease remission (94.3%, P < 0.05), whereas most of those with a rough-type margin experienced disease progression (84.8%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with HCC with a sharp-type margin enhancement on MRI after DEB-TACE mostly demonstrated benign lesions with a good prognosis, whereas those with a rough-type margin mostly demonstrated malignant growth.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization could improve the hepatic hemodynamics of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is widely used for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, previous studies have demonstrated that conventional TACE (cTACE) might affect hepatic hemodynamics, which both associate with liver cirrhosis and survival. Drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) improves treatment efficacy and safety, but its effects on the hepatic hemodynamics of HCC patients with cirrhosis remain unknown. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included unresectable HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE from April 2018 to September 2020, who had limited tumor burden and liver function. The hepatic hemodynamics was measured by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) using occlusion balloon catheter before and after treatment. Baseline characteristics of demography, laboratory (tumoral and liver-function) and hepatic hemodynamics were compared between patients with and without clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Laboratory examination and imaging assessments were performed 4-6 weeks; overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from DEB-TACE initiation until death or last follow-up. Results: Twenty-four eligible consecutive HCC patients were included, with a median age of 58.0 years and 54.2% in Child-Pugh A class. During a median follow-up of 9.8 months, median OS for the whole cohort of patients reached 10.0 months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analyses demonstrated that age >60 years, ascites, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 1, Child-Pugh B class, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >10, and albumin (ALB) <35 g/L were prognostic factors for decreased OS (P<0.05). Importantly, hepatic hemodynamics were significantly improved in patients after treatment with DEB-TACE (7.5 vs. 5.3 mmHg of HVPG, P<0.001), especially for those with CSPH (13.6 vs. 10.2 mmHg of HVPG, P=0.014). Conclusions: DEB-TACE can improve hepatic hemodynamics in HCC patients, especially those with CSPH. Combing these findings with its effects on tumor, DEB-TACE might be more suitable for HCC patients with cirrhosis.

The impact of drug-eluting bead (vs. conventional) transarterial chemoembolization on hepatic fibrosis in treating intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Limited studies have reported the impact of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) on hepatic fibrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated multiple hepatic fibrosis indicators, aiming to comprehensively compare the influence of DEB-TACE and conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) on hepatic fibrosis in treating HCC patients. METHODS: Intermediate/advanced HCC patients (N = 121) were divided into the DEB-TACE group (n = 62) and the cTACE group (n = 59) based on their chosen treatment. Serum hyaluronic acid (HA), pro-collagen type-III (PC-III), collagen type-IV (IV-C), and laminin (LN) were detected; aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on the four factors (FIB-4) were calculated; liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was assessed by real-time shear wave elastography. RESULTS: HA, PC-III, IV-C, and LN at 1 month after the second TACE and at 12 months after the first TACE were all decreased in DEB-TACE group compared with cTACE group (all P < .050). Then, APRI, FIB-4, and LSM were further assessed, which also showed a decreasing trend at aforementioned timepoints in DEB-TACE group compared with cTACE group (all P < .050). Additionally, the multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that DEB-TACE (vs. cTACE) was independently associated with reduced occurrence of severe hepatic fibrosis at 12 months (OR = 0.215, 95%CI: 0.058-0.802, P = .022). Concerning the liver function indexes, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin after treatment were not different between the two groups (all P > .050). CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE displays attenuated hepatic fibrosis progression and noninferior tolerance compared to cTACE in treating intermediate- or advanced-stage HCC patients.

D-dimer for assessment of treatment response, and survival to drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: D-dimer exhibits a certain prognostic value in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy and microwave ablation, while its value in estimating the clinical benefit of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the correlation of D-dimer with tumor features, response and survival to DEB-TACE in HCC patients. METHODS: Fifty-one HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE were recruited. Their serum samples at baseline and after DEB-TACE were collected and proposed for D-dimer detection by the immunoturbidimetry method. RESULTS: Elevated D-dimer levels were related to a higher Child‒Pugh stage (P = 0.013), tumor nodule number (P = 0.031), largest tumor size (P = 0.004), and portal vein invasion (P = 0.050) in HCC patients. Then, patients were classified by the median value of D-dimer, and it was observed that patients with D-dimer >0.7 mg/L achieved a lower complete response rate (12.0% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.007) but a similar objective response rate (84.0% vs. 84.6%, P = 1.000) compared to those with D-dimer ≤0.7 mg/L. The Kaplan‒Meier curve showed that D-dimer >0.7 mg/L (vs. ≤0.7 mg/L) was related to shorter overall survival (OS) (P = 0.013). Further univariate Cox regression analyses showed that D-dimer >0.7 mg/L (vs. ≤0.7 mg/L) was related to unfavorable OS [hazard ratio (HR): 5.524, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.209-25.229, P = 0.027], but it failed to independently estimate OS (HR: 10.303, 95%CI: 0.640-165.831, P = 0.100) in multivariate Cox regression analyses. Moreover, D-dimer was elevated during DEB-TACE therapy (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: D-dimer may be helpful for monitoring prognosis to DEB-TACE therapy in HCC, while further large-scale-study validation is warranted.

The addition of camrelizumab is effective and safe among unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients who progress after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Camrelizumab synergizes with apatinib or transarterial chemoembolization via tumor immunity and chemosensitivity. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib with or without drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after progression to DEB-TACE plus apatinib. METHODS: Eighty-nine unresectable HCC patients accepted previous DEB-TACE plus apatinib therapy, then further received second-line camrelizumab plus apatinib with or without DEB-TACE treatment. Treatment responses were calculated at 3 months (M3) and 6 months (M6). Survival and treatment-related adverse events were documented. RESULTS: Objective response rate and disease control rate were 39.3% and 80.9% at M3; meanwhile, they were 22.4% and 54.1% at M6. Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) (95% confidence interval (CI)) was 7.0 (6.2-7.8) months with a 1-year PFS rate of 18.4%; the median overall survival (OS) (95% CI) was 17.0 (15.3-18.7) months with a 1-year OS rate of 73.9%. Multivariable Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis presented that 3-4 times (vs. 0 time) of DEB-TACE, apatinib dose duration> 4 months, and camrelizumab dose duration> 5 months independently predicted longer PFS (all P<0.05); meanwhile, declined ECOG PS score, new lesions as progression pattern, 1-2 and 3-4 times (vs. 0 time) of DEB-TACE, apatinib dose duration> 4 months independently predicted prolonged OS (all P<0.05). Moreover, treatment-related adverse events mainly included grade 1-2 fever, gastrointestinal reaction, fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypertension. CONCLUSION: After progression to DEB-TACE plus apatinib treatment, the addition of camrelizumab is effective and safe among unresectable HCC patients.

Callispheres drug-eluting bead transhepatic artery chemoembolization with oral delivery of sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable liver cancer.

Objective: Liver cancer is a significant contributor to global burden of cancer. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard of care for patients with unresectable liver cancer, and CalliSpheres, as novel drug-eluting bead (DEB) microspheres, have been found to be associated with a high tumor response rate. However, the outcomes after DEB-TACE treatment are not always satisfactory with tumor recurrence. Herein, we attempt to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE with sorafenib and conventional TACE in treating advanced liver cancer. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 96 patients with liver cancer, among which there were 48 cases receiving DEB-TACE with sorafenib and 48 cases receiving conventional TACE. The physical properties of Callispheres were evaluated in HepG2 cells and a B6/J mouse model. Results: DEB-TACE with Callispheres were demonstrated to effectively maintain stability and prolong the half-life of epirubicin. Compared with the patients receiving conventional TACE, those receiving DEB-TACE with sorafenib exhibited better patient outcomes with increased survival rate, reduced tumor volume, and declined levels of tumor markers. Additionally, DEB-TACE with Callispheres could effectively protect liver function, as well as reduce the toxic effects of loaded epirubicin, and its combination with sorafenib would not increase the incidence of adverse reactions. Conclusion: DEB-TACE using CalliSpheres combined with sorafenib could prevent the progression of liver cancer and bring a better prognosis.