Deferral of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Testing Before Contrast-Enhanced CT in Low-Risk Emergency Department Patients: Assessment of Safety and Impact on Throughput.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and utility of deferring estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) testing before contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in low-risk emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: A new question was added to CECT order screens, allowing ordering ED providers to defer eGFR testing in patients deemed low risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). Low risk was defined as no known chronic kidney disease (CKD) or risk factors for AKI or CKD. Patients on chronic dialysis were deemed low risk. The project included three phases: baseline, pilot (optional order question), and full implementation (required order question). Outcomes were operational throughput metrics of CECT order to protocol (O to P) and order to begin (O to B) times. As a balancing safety measure, the proportion of patients deemed to be "low risk" and subsequently found to have eGFR value less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 was reported. RESULTS: A total of 16,446 CECT studies were included from four EDs. In the pilot phase, provider engagement rates with the question were low (5%-14%). After full implementation, median O to P time improved from 23.93 min at baseline to 13.02 (P < .0001) and median O to B time improved from 80.34 min to 76.48 (P = .0002). In 0.3% (2 of 646) studies, CECT was completed in patients categorized as low risk by the ED provider with subsequently resulted eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. DISCUSSION: Upfront clinical risk assessment for AKI and CKD by ED providers can be used to safely defer eGFR testing and improve operational performance for patients requiring CECT.

Interpretation of Lung Cancer Plasma EGFR Mutation Tests in the Clinical Setting.

OBJECTIVES: Comprehensive data synthesis of the clinical parameters that affect plasma EGFR mutation test results in non-small cell lung carcinoma is lacking. Although individual studies have suggested a variety of patient characteristics that can affect diagnostic accuracy, no unified conclusion has been reached. METHODS: We analyzed 170 plasma EGFR mutation tests performed between 2015 and 2021 at our institution and carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify clinical and imaging features that correlate with plasma EGFR mutation test sensitivity. RESULTS: Data synthesis from 14 studies of 2,576 patients revealed that patients with stage IV disease had a significantly lower false-negative rate than those with stage I through III disease. For our institutional cohort, which consisted of 75 paired plasma and tissue tests that were assessable for diagnostic accuracy, the overall sensitivity was 70.59% (95% confidence interval, 56.17%-82.51%). Patients who had distant metastases and more suspicious lymph nodes on imaging findings correlated with a low false-negative rate. CONCLUSIONS: While interpreting plasma EGFR mutation results, extra caution should be exercised for patients with early-stage, localized disease to accommodate the possibility of false-negative results. These meta-analyses and clinical data may enable clinicians to make evidence-based judgments for individual patients.

Improving Time-to-Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients through Faster Single Gene EGFR Testing Using the Idylla™ EGFR Testing Platform.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may benefit from a short time-to-treatment (TTT). Predictive biomarker testing is performed prior to treatment, as recommended by various international expert consensus bodies. Genetic testing is more time-intensive than immunohistochemistry (IHC) and commonly contributes to prolonged TTT. For epidermal growth factor receptor-positive patients (EGFR+), further genetic testing may not be required due to the mutual exclusivity of actionable mutations. METHODS: The trial cohort (N = 238) received both BC Cancer NGS panel (Oncopanel) and Idylla EGFR testing. Data were also collected for a control cohort (N = 220) that received Oncopanel testing. For each patient, the time that the lab received the sample, the time taken to report the NGS and Idylla tests, the time of first treatment, and the final treatment regimen were recorded. RESULTS: A concordance frequency of 98.7% (232/235) was observed between the Idylla and NGS panel. The lab turnaround time (TAT) was faster for the Idylla test by an average of 12.4 days (N = 235, p < 0.01). Overall, the average TTT in the trial cohort (N = 114) was 10.1 days faster (p < 0.05) than the control (N = 114), leading to a 25% reduction in TTT. For patients treated based on EGFR positivity, the mean TTT was 16.8 days faster (p < 0.05) in the trial cohort (N = 33) than the control cohort (N = 28), leading to a 48% reduction in TTT. CONCLUSION: Using the Idylla EGFR test as part of the molecular testing repertoire in advanced-stage NSCLC patients could significantly reduce TTT.

Testing for EGFR Mutations and ALK Rearrangements in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Considerations for Countries in Emerging Markets.

The treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years has been increasingly guided by biomarker testing. Testing has centered on driver genetic alterations involving the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements. The presence of these mutations is predictive of response to targeted therapies such as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and ALK TKIs. However, there are substantial challenges for the implementation of biomarker testing, particularly in emerging countries. Understanding the barriers to testing in NSCLC will be key to improving molecular testing rates worldwide and patient outcomes as a result. In this article, we review EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements as predictive biomarkers for NSCLC, discuss a selection of appropriate tests and review the literature with respect to the global uptake of EGFR and ALK testing. To help improve testing rates and unify procedures, we review our experiences with biomarker testing in China, South Korea, Russia, Turkey, Brazil, Argentina and Mexico, and propose a set of recommendations that pathologists from emerging countries can apply to assist with the diagnosis of NSCLC.

A Multi-Center, Real-Life Experience on Liquid Biopsy Practice for EGFR Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients.

BACKGROUND: circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a source of tumor genetic material for EGFR testing in NSCLC. Real-word data about liquid biopsy (LB) clinical practice are lacking. The aim of the study was to describe the LB practice for EGFR detection in North Eastern Italy. METHODS: we conducted a multi-regional survey on ctDNA testing practices in lung cancer patients. RESULTS: Median time from blood collection to plasma separation was 50 min (20-120 min), median time from plasma extraction to ctDNA analysis was 24 h (30 min-5 days) and median turnaround time was 24 h (6 h-5 days). Four hundred and seventy five patients and 654 samples were tested. One hundred and ninety-two patients were tested at diagnosis, with 16% EGFR mutation rate. Among the 283 patients tested at disease progression, 35% were T790M+. Main differences in LB results between 2017 and 2018 were the number of LBs performed for each patient at disease progression (2.88 vs. 1.2, respectively) and the percentage of T790M+ patients (61% vs. 26%).

Ultrarapid EGFR Mutation Screening Followed by Comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing: A Feasible, Informative Approach for Lung Carcinoma Cytology Specimens With a High Success Rate.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with advanced NSCLC, cytologic samples may be the only diagnostic specimen available for molecular profiling. Although both rapid and comprehensive assessment are essential in this setting, an integrated multitest approach remains an important strategy in many laboratories, despite the risks and challenges when working with scant samples. In this study, we describe our experience and high success rate in using a multitest approach, focusing on the clinical validation and incorporation of ultrarapid EGFR testing using the Idylla system followed by comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHODS: Cytology samples received for routine molecular testing were included in this study. The performance characteristics of the EGFR Idylla assay were assessed; tissue suitability parameters and interpretation criteria to supplement automated mutation calling were established. The assay performance was monitored for 1 year, comparing the results with those of concurrent NGS testing by MSK-IMPACT (primarily) or MSK-AmpliSeq and MSK-Fusion solid panel in a subset of cases. RESULTS: Overall, 301 samples were studied; 83 samples were included in validation (60.2% [50 of 83] were positive for EGFR mutations). Concordance with the reference method was 96.4% (80 of 83) of the samples with excellent reproducibility. The limit of detection was variable depending on the total tissue input and the specific mutation tested. Unextracted tissue inputs that maintained total EGFR cycle of quantification at less than 23 allowed all mutations to be detected if present at greater than 5% variant allele frequency. Mutations could be detected at 1% variant allele frequency with total EGFR cycle of quantification of 18. During the clinical implementation phase, 218 NSCLC samples were tested by Idylla (24.3% [53 of 218] were EGFR mutation positive). Concurrent NGS testing was requested on 165 samples and successfully performed on 96.4% (159 of 165) of the samples. The Idylla automated results were concordant with those obtained by NGS in 96.2% (153 of 159) of cases and improved to 98.7% (157 of 159) after incorporation of manual review criteria to supplement automated calling, resulting in a diagnostic sensitivity of 95.6% (95% confidence interval: 84.9%-99.5%). In general, 9% (14 of 159) of the cases tested by NGS had EGFR mutations not covered by the Idylla assay, primarily insertions in exon 19 and 20 and minor mutations cooccurring with canonical sensitizing mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive molecular testing is feasible and has a high success rate in NSCLC cytology samples when using a multitest approach. Testing with the Idylla system enables rapid and accurate determination of the EGFR status without compromising subsequent NGS testing.

[Disparities of EGFR mutations between Biopsy and Rebiopsy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients].

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-based targeted therapy improves the survival of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. However, factors including treatment or heterogeneity partly contribute to EGFR genetic status alteration between baseline and disease progresses (PD). The aim of this study is to compare difference of EGFR mutations between biopsy and rebiopsy in real world. METHODS: Data from 61 paired specimens performed EGFR testing in Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and December 2017 were collected and analyzed. The specimens were collected at baseline and PD, confirmed by histology or cytology and categorized as tumor tissue, malignant pleural effusion or plasma. All patients were naive and received chemotherapy or targeted therapy as first-line treatment. Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS) was used to detect EGFR mutations. RESULTS: EGFR mutation rate in tumor tissue, pleural effusion or blood was 90.2% vs 88.5%, 6.6% vs 6.6% and 3.2% vs 4.9% at baseline or PD respectively and discrepancy was 72% and 36.3% for the same (n=50) or different (n=11) type of specimens. The EGFR mutation rate was 95.1% and 91.8% in patients before and after treatment, and the discrepancy was 63.9%, among which, 69.2% and 92.3% in chemotherapy-treated patients (n=13) with discrepancy to 46.1% (6/13), and 100.0% and 91.7% in EGFR-TKI-treated patients (n=48) with discrepancy to 70.8%. There were four types of alterations in terms of EGFR mutations: wild type turned into mutation (4.9%), mutation disappeared (8.2%), sensitive mutations transformed (1.6%), and new mutations appeared (49.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In real world, the EGFR mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients altered significantly, due to tissue resources and therapeutic approaches, implying the importance of rebiopsy and real-time detection of EGFR mutation, in order to provide data to guide precise strategy in the following treatment.

Underutilization and disparities in access to EGFR testing among Medicare patients with lung cancer from 2010 - 2013.

BACKGROUND: Tumor testing for mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene is indicated for all newly diagnosed, metastatic lung cancer patients, who may be candidates for first-line treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Few studies have analyzed population-level testing. METHODS: We identified clinical, demographic, and regional predictors of EGFR & KRAS testing among Medicare beneficiaries with a new diagnosis of lung cancer in 2011-2013 claims. The outcome variable was whether the patient underwent molecular, EGFR and KRAS testing. Independent variables included: patient demographics, Medicaid status, clinical characteristics, and region where the patient lived. We performed multivariate logistic regression to identify factors that predicted testing. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2013, there was a 19.7% increase in the rate of EGFR testing. Patient zip code had the greatest impact on odds to undergo testing; for example, patients who lived in the Boston, Massachusetts hospital referral region were the most likely to be tested (odds ratio (OR) of 4.94, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.67-14.62). Patient demographics also impacted odds to be tested. Asian/Pacific Islanders were most likely to be tested (OR 1.63, CI 1.53-1.79). Minorities and Medicaid patients were less likely to be tested. Medicaid recipients had an OR of 0.74 (CI 0.72-0.77). Hispanics and Blacks were also less likely to be tested (OR 0.97, CI 0.78-0.99 and 0.95, CI 0.92-0.99), respectively. Clinical procedures were also correlated with testing. Patients who underwent transcatheter biopsies were 2.54 times more likely to be tested (CI 2.49-2.60) than those who did not undergo this type of biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an overall increase in EGFR testing, there is widespread underutilization of guideline-recommended testing. We observed racial, income, and regional disparities in testing. Precision medicine has increased the complexity of cancer diagnosis and treatment. Targeted interventions and clinical decision support tools are needed to ensure that all patients are benefitting from advances in precision medicine. Without such interventions, precision medicine may exacerbate racial disparities in cancer care and health outcomes.

Disparities of EGFR mutations between Biopsy and Rebiopsy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients / 中国肺癌杂志

BACKGROUND@#Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-based targeted therapy improves the survival of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. However, factors including treatment or heterogeneity partly contribute to EGFR genetic status alteration between baseline and disease progresses (PD). The aim of this study is to compare difference of EGFR mutations between biopsy and rebiopsy in real world.@*METHODS@#Data from 61 paired specimens performed EGFR testing in Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and December 2017 were collected and analyzed. The specimens were collected at baseline and PD, confirmed by histology or cytology and categorized as tumor tissue, malignant pleural effusion or plasma. All patients were naive and received chemotherapy or targeted therapy as first-line treatment. Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS) was used to detect EGFR mutations.@*RESULTS@#EGFR mutation rate in tumor tissue, pleural effusion or blood was 90.2% vs 88.5%, 6.6% vs 6.6% and 3.2% vs 4.9% at baseline or PD respectively and discrepancy was 72% and 36.3% for the same (n=50) or different (n=11) type of specimens. The EGFR mutation rate was 95.1% and 91.8% in patients before and after treatment, and the discrepancy was 63.9%, among which, 69.2% and 92.3% in chemotherapy-treated patients (n=13) with discrepancy to 46.1% (6/13), and 100.0% and 91.7% in EGFR-TKI-treated patients (n=48) with discrepancy to 70.8%. There were four types of alterations in terms of EGFR mutations: wild type turned into mutation (4.9%), mutation disappeared (8.2%), sensitive mutations transformed (1.6%), and new mutations appeared (49.1%).@*CONCLUSIONS@#In real world, the EGFR mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients altered significantly, due to tissue resources and therapeutic approaches, implying the importance of rebiopsy and real-time detection of EGFR mutation, in order to provide data to guide precise strategy in the following treatment.

Utilization Patterns and Trends in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Testing Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy significantly improves outcomes among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors harbor sensitizing mutations. Patterns of EGFR testing have not been well-documented. The objective of this population-based study is to assess the testing pattern on a national scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using MarketScan 2012 to 2014 data, we identified 5842 patients newly diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer from January 2013 to June 2014 and assessed their EGFR mutation testing pattern in the 6 months after diagnosis. We further examined the testing rate among patients who received the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. Because histology information is not available in this database, we also conducted a subgroup analysis of EGFR testing among patients who were treated with bevacizumab or pemetrexed, who are likely to have non-squamous NSCLC. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to ascertain factors associated with EGFR testing. RESULTS: Of 5842 patients with metastatic lung cancer, 1039 (18%) had claims for EGFR testing within 6 months of diagnosis, and 283 (5%) received erlotinib. The testing rate among patients who received erlotinib was 42%. Within a subgroup of 1685 patients treated with bevacizumab or pemetrexed, 616 (37%) underwent EGFR testing. Multivariable logistic regression showed that younger patients, female patients, patients with fewer comorbidities, and patients living in the West region were more likely to receive EGFR testing. CONCLUSION: This population-based study demonstrates low EGFR testing rates among advanced lung cancer patients in 2013 and 2014.

A prospective, phase II, open-label study (JO22903) of first-line erlotinib in Japanese patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

INTRODUCTION: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor erlotinib is associated with survival benefits in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase II, single-arm study examined the efficacy and safety of first-line erlotinib in Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. METHODS: Eligible patients received erlotinib 150 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: A high degree of concordance was observed between different mutation testing methodologies, suggesting feasibility of early, rapid detection of EGFR mutations. Median PFS was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7-15.3) at data cut-off (1 June 2012) (n = 102). Exon 19 deletions seemed to be associated with longer PFS compared with L858R mutations; T790M mutations were tentatively linked with shorter PFS. The safety profile was as expected: rash (any grade; 83%) and diarrhea (any grade; 81%) were most common. Six interstitial lung disease (ILD)-like cases were reported, and 5 were confirmed as ILD-like events by the extramural committee. Two patients died of treatment-related pneumonitis (JAPIC Clinical Trials Information number: Japic CTI-101085). CONCLUSION: Erlotinib should be considered for first-line treatment in this subset of Japanese patients, with close monitoring for ILD-like events.