Comparative evaluation of socioeconomic insecurity in peripheral and coronary artery disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease represents the leading cause of death worldwide. Socioeconomic deprivation is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We have previously shown that precariousness was more frequent in symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients than in the general population. According to a previous study, coronary artery disease (CAD) patients have a higher level of education than CAD with PAD, but no study directly compared the level of precariousness in PAD and CAD patients. AIM: To measure and compare the level of socioeconomic insecurity in patients suffering from symptomatic PAD with those suffering from isolated CAD, i.e without symptomatic PAD. METHODS: We conducted an observational, cohort, prospective, multicenter study. Patients suffering from symptomatic PAD or CAD were recruited through the medical or surgical vascular or cardiology departments, or the vascular rehabilitation center. The EPICES score and the INSEE parameters were used for analysis. The individual is considered precarious when his or her score is greater than or equal to 30. Cardiovascular risk factors and peripheral arterial disease stages were also collected. RESULTS: In total, 230 patients were included. According to the EPICES score, 47.8% [95%CI, 38.7-56.7] of patients with symptomatic PAD were in a precarious situation compared to 17.4% [95%CI, 10.5-24.3] of patients suffering from isolated CAD (P<0.001). The mean EPICES score was 33.3 (SD 22.5) in the PAD and 16.9 (SD 17.02) in the CAD population, respectively (P<0.001). In the PAD population, the level of education was low, with an under-representation of patients with a baccalaureate or higher education degree: 21.7% [95%CI, 14.2-29.3] vs. 41.7% [95%CI, 32.7-50.7] in the PAD and CAD populations, respectively. There was also an under-representation of executives and intellectual and intermediate professions in the PAD population, 18.3% [95%CI, 11.2-25.3], compared to the CAD population, 31.3% [95%CI, 22.8-39.8]. CONCLUSION: PAD patients are more precarious than patients suffering from CAD. A better detection of socioeconomic deprivation in patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease could allow comprehensive care and thus hope for an improvement in terms of morbidity and mortality.

The relationship between social deprivation and a frailty index of cumulative deficits in French middle-aged caregivers.

BACKGROUND: The Institut Pasteur de Lille, in the north of France, has implemented a large, multidisciplinary health check, which aims to identify frailty in middle-aged caregivers. We aimed to construct an adapted frailty index of cumulative deficit (FI-CD) and study the associated factors, in particular socioeconomic factors. METHODS: The cross-sectional study included caregivers aged 45 to 65. A 34-item FI-CD including deficits adapted to a middle-aged population (related to cognition and autonomy, dietetics, physical activity, comorbidities, functional signs, lab values and paraclinical examinations) was constructed in accordance with standard procedures. It was calculated as a ratio of deficits present out of the total number of possible deficits, giving a continuous score between 0 and 1. Scores > 0.25 and >  0.4 were classified as frailty and severe frailty, respectively. Univariate and multivariate associations were studied using linear regressions. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen caregivers were included; among them, 111 were analyzed due to missing values. The mean FI-CD was 0.22 ± 0.08. Forty (36%) individuals were classified as frailty and three (2.7%) as severe frailty. In multivariate analysis, FI-CD was significantly associated with age (beta [95% confidence interval] = 0.005 [0.002; 0.009] per 1-year increase, p = 0.005) and social deprivation (beta = 0.054 [0.007; 0.102], p = 0.025). A significant interaction was observed between and age and social deprivation (p = 0.036). The adjusted relationship between FI-CD and age was beta = 0.010 [0.002; 0.019], p = 0.017 in precarious caregivers, and beta = 0.003 [- 0.001; 0.007], p = 0.19 in non-precarious caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested that the 34-item FI-CD could have clinical utility in the management of middle-aged caregivers. Social deprivation appeared as an important factor associated with frailty, highlighting the importance of early care and social support for precarious caregivers.

Validation of the 'EPICES' social deprivation score in a population of women who have just given birth: a French cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance of the EPICES score for identifying social deprivation during pregnancy in a population of women in the immediate postpartum period. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional survey took place between 5th June and 5th August 2017, among women who had just given birth in either of the maternity units in Clermont-Ferrand, France. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was completed by women. The questionnaire came in two parts: the EPICES index and the criteria for social deprivation defined by French law. These criteria were chosen to define the reference standard. The women were classified into two groups, living in precarious circumstances or not, according to the criteria defined by the French law (reference standard). To determine the most relevant threshold of the EPICES score, the precision associated with the threshold (the fraction of those predicted positive who are true positives: positive predictive value) was balanced with its sensitivity. EPICES scores above the threshold were classified as deprived, those below as non-deprived. RESULTS: Of the 947 women who gave birth during the study period, 700 (73.9%) completed the self-administered questionnaire. The best trade-off between precision and sensitivity was obtained with a threshold of 22. For this threshold value, the positive predictive value was 42.3% and the sensitivity 70.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The EPICES score with a threshold validated in the population of pregnant women is a useful, rapid, and easy-to-use tool that makes it possible to identify maternal deprivation at an individual level.

Evaluation of socio-economic insecurity in peripheral artery disease patients.

The social and economic environment has become a major determinant of cardiovascular health. The objective of our study was to assess socio-economic insecurity in patients with symptomatic PAD. The PRECAR study was a non-interventional prospective cohort study. Patients were recruited from the Vascular Medicine and Surgery Departments of Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital or during a consultation as part of the therapeutic education program "On the move! Better understanding and better living with arterial disease". The analysis of socio-economic and environmental data was based on the EPICES score (a reliable index used to measure individual deprivation) and INSEE parameters (level of education and socio-professional category). Cardiovascular risk factors were also recorded. 150 patients with symptomatic PAD were included between November 2017 and June 2018. 84% were men. In our population 54% (CI95% 45.7 - 62.1) were in a precarious situation compared to 40% (CI95% 39.8 - 40.2) in the general population, according to the EPICES score (P<0.001). Levels of education were low and patients with a baccalaureate or higher education degree were under-represented. Executives, intellectuals and intermediate professions were also under-represented in the PAD population. This data opens new perspectives on the social characterisation of patients that may contribute to improving the outcomes of patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Low-level HIV viremia is associated with low antiretroviral prescription refill rates and social deprivation.

Optimal management of patients experiencing persistent low-level viremia (LLV) remains challenging and poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the association between poor antiretroviral treatment (ARV) adherence and persistent LLV. ADHELOW is a sub-study of the ECHEC cohort comprising HIV-infected adults with virological failure (viral load>50 copies/mL). Patients were recruited in 2013-2015 from 4 French university hospitals. Those with LLV (i.e., ≥2 viral load measurements between 50 and 500 copies/mL) were selected and matched on age and sex to 3 controls with virological suppression. The adherence rate was estimated using pharmacy-delivered prescription refills over one year. Overall, 60 patients were included (15 LLV and 45 controls). Mean age was 50.20 years, M/F sex ratio was 14 and mean EPICES (social deprivation) score was 42.90. In univariable analyses, LLV patients had significantly lower adherence (<80%: 53.30% vs. 6.67%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to have an EPICES score >40.2 (60.00% vs. 24.44%, p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, these two variables remained significantly associated with LLV (OR 31.49, CI 95% [4.54-218.70]) and OR 11.00 (CI 95% [1.87-218.70], respectively). Poor long-term treatment adherence, estimated by prescription refills, was strongly associated with LLV. This reinforces the message that adherence counseling should be the primary intervention to overcome LLV.

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with decreased survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with poor prognosis in patients with solid tumors. However, few studies have assessed the association between socioeconomic parameters and prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), and these report conflicting results. Our monocentric study assessed the impact of socioeconomic deprivation using the validated EPICES (Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centers) score in a prospective cohort of intensively treated AML patients. METHODS: EPICES questionnaires were given to patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML at the Paoli Calmettes Institute between July 2012 and December 2014. Study participants were categorized as non-deprived (score <30.17), deprived (score 30.17-48.51), or very-deprived (score ≥ 48.52). The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). The independence of EPICES score effects was analyzed via Cox regression with adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: 209 AML patients received the questionnaire, 149 (71.3 %) patients responded. The median EPICES score was 23.6; 26.8 % and 10.1 % of patients were deprived and very deprived, respectively. OS was 23.16 months (95 %CI [17.15-33.31]). According to multivariate analysis, a very-deprived EPICES score, European Leukemia Net categories, age, smoking, and the absence of allogeneic stem cell transplantation were independent factors associated with decreased OS. CONCLUSION: Our results underscore the importance of integrating nonbiological factors in the prognostic stratification of AML patients. The very deprived population exhibited worse OS, confirming that socioeconomic parameters play a role in patient outcomes in AML. Very deprived patients with AML should receive specific attention and adapted clinical management.

Healthcare itinerary of women undergoing an abortion according to their vulnerability.

CONTEXT: Precariousness is increasing among all populations and especially among women. The access to healthcare is increasingly unequal upon the population and particularly in access to contraception methods or abortion according to their vulnerability level. OBJECTIVE: Our main object is to describe the socio-demographic specifications, the different steps involved in the healthcare itinerary to contraception and abortion, according to the level of social vulnerability for a woman population sample requesting an abortion. The secondary objects are to detect the existence of a difficult healthcare itinerary and to describe the exposure to risky situations or behaviors according to their vulnerability level. METHOD: It is an observational cross-sectional survey to women having recourse to induced abortion in centers providing them, during 3 month in 2014, in the Aquitaine area. The validated tool to evaluate this situation in a psycho-social approach is the "EPICES score". RESULTS: Our sample identifies 49% of women in a precariousness situation. These women are younger and more often less employed. They benefit less often from a regular gynecology follow-up, do not use contraception as often and resort to abortion more often. They relate more often risky behavior for the health, conflict with the partner and psychological, physical violence. CONCLUSION: Special attention should be brought to all women in request of an abortion, for half of them are in a precarious situation and this physical might be a rare occasion of access to healthcare. Violence screening should be systematic and the choice of a long term birth control method should be encouraged.

Deprivation, occupational hazards and perinatal outcomes in pregnant workers.

BACKGROUND: Recent global economic difficulties have widened social inequalities, but their impact on pregnant workers is not known. AIMS: To investigate the association between deprivation, exposure to occupational hazards and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study performed in 2014 in French occupational health services. Eligible workers were women who had worked during their pregnancy and had a medical visit by occupational health physicians (OHPs) after delivery and at the time of returning to work. Deprivation was measured using the EPICES scale (Evaluation of Precariousness and Inequalities in Health Examination Centres). Information on birth outcomes was self-reported. Occupational risks for pregnancy were assessed by OHPs. Jobs were coded by the occupational health team using standardized French nomenclature. The groups (deprivation/no deprivation) were compared using univariate (chi-squared test) and multivariate Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 1402 pregnant workers, 293 (21%) were classed as deprived. This group more frequently encountered occupational hazards, particularly for physical exposures (P < 0.001), and had a higher risk of cumulated occupational hazards of three or more for pregnancy [adjusted relative risk (RRa) = 4.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-7.9]. Our findings suggest that deprivation and exposure to three or more occupational hazards during pregnancy cumulatively increased the risk of pre-term birth (RRa = 3.9; 95% CI 1.2-12.4). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that deprived pregnant workers are an occupationally vulnerable group.

Is individual social deprivation associated with adverse perinatal outcomes? Results of a French multicentre cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: French national health programmes take into account social deprivation in their implementation, those targeting perinatal outcomes, especially. The main aim of the present work was to assess the association between individual social deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional population-based survey was performed between October and December 2007. Eligible women delivered a baby in one of the three maternity hospitals of Clermont-Ferrand area, and read and spoke French fluently. Women who had undergone voluntary termination of pregnancy were excluded. Individual social deprivation was measured by the EPICES score. Standard prenatal follow-up defined by having less than 7 consultations and quality of prenatal care defined by having at least four consultations were measured. Adverse perinatal outcomes were measured by a composite criterion defined by women who had the occurrence of the three main causes of pregnancy-related disorders: preterm delivery, and/or diabetes, and/or obstetrical hypertension. RESULTS: Of the 471 eligible women, 464 were finally included. One hundred and fifteen (24.78%) women were socially deprived. The most deprived women had poor standard prenatal follow-up (p = 0.003) and poor quality of prenatal care (0.03). Nationality was the sole confounding factor identified. Deprived women had a two-fold greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, adjusted odds ratio 1.95 [1.15; 3.29]. DISCUSSION: Social deprivation was associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Social deprivation should be systematically screened in pregnant women standard follow-up, among migrant women, especially.