Successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a failing HAART 300 aortic valve annuloplasty ring: A case report.

Transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has evolved from a complex procedure meant only for patients at prohibitive risk for surgery to a commonly performed procedure across a wide variety of clinical scenarios including the treatment of failed aortic valve bioprosthesis. Annuloplasty rings in the aortic position such as HAART 300 (Biostable Science and Engineering) have been introduced in the management of native aortic regurgitation. Percutaneous management of failed bioprosthesis rings in the aortic position has not been widely described. We present a case of a 69-year-old man with recurrent aortic regurgitation successfully treated with TAVR using a SAPIEN 3 valve within a HAART 300 ring.

The Multicenter STudy On a Precise algorithm for diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, STOP-HFPEF study: study protocol and design.

This study aims to develop a new heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) diagnostic algorithm tailored to Asian populations, addressing limitations of current diagnostic models. Existing HFpEF diagnostic algorithms primarily target patients with dyspnea and metabolic comorbidities, such as obesity, which are more prevalent in Western populations. However, in Asian countries, HFpEF cases are less frequently associated with obesity, leading to less prominent dyspnea and more noticeable symptoms such as fatigue. By incorporating exercise stress echocardiography and focusing on early-stage HFpEF, particularly in patients with symptoms beyond dyspnea, we seek to enable early diagnosis and intervention, ultimately extending healthy life expectancy and improving quality of life. The STOP-HFPEF (The Multicenter STudy On a Precise algorithm for diagnosis of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction) study is a multicenter prospective observational investigation in Japan. Certified by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, the study includes participants aged 20 and older who undergo exercise stress echocardiography. The primary goal is to develop a scoring model for diagnosing HFpEF in heart-failure stages A, B, and C. Secondary outcomes will assess the clinical utility of the new diagnostic score by comparing heart-failure incidence, cardiovascular events, and mortality rates.Study registration: Registered at the UMIN registry (UMIN000054565) on 1 July 2024.

Hyperuricemia in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients: Prevalence and Association with Functional Improvement and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

INTRODUCTION: The role of uric acid (UA) and Hyper Uricemia (HU) in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients have been very little studied. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of HU and if it is associated to the functional improvement obtained or the left ventricular Ejection Fraction (EF) in CR patients after Acute or Chronic Coronary Syndrome (ACS and CCS respectively). METHODS: We enrol 411 patients (62.4 ± 10.2 years; males 79.8%) enrolled in the CR program at Niguarda Hospital (Milan) from January 2012 to May 2023. HU was defined both as the classic cut-off (> 6 for females, > 7 mg/dL for males) and with the newly identified one by the URRAH study (> 5.1 for females, > 5.6 mg/dL for males). All patients performed a 6MWT and an echocardiography at the beginning and at the end of CR program. RESULTS: Mean UA values were within the normal range (5.6 ± 1.4 mg/dL) with 19.5% (classic cut-off) HU patients with an increase to 47.4% with the newer one. Linear regression analysis showed no role for UA in determining functional improvement, while UA and hyperuricemia (classic cut-off) were associated to admission and discharge EF. The same was not with the URRAH cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: HU is as frequent in CR patients as in those with ACS and CCS. UA didn't correlate with functional recovery while it is associated with admission and discharge EF as also is for HU (classic cut-off). Whit the URRAH cut-off HU prevalence increases significantly, however, it doesn't show any significant association with EF.

Prevalence of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the PRACTICA study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is a frequent cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ATTR-CA in HFpEF patients in a multicenter nationwide study. METHODS: Consecutive ambulatory or hospitalized patients aged ≥ 50 years with HFpEF and left ventricle hypertrophy ≥ 12 mm were studied at 20 Spanish hospitals. Screening for CA was initiated according to the usual clinical practice at each center. Positive scintigraphs were analyzed centrally. RESULTS: A total of 422 patients were included, of whom 387 underwent further screening for CA. Sixty-five patients (16.8%) were diagnosed with ATTR-CA, and none was younger than 75 years. Prevalence increased with age. Among these patients, 60% were men, with a mean age of 85.3 ± 5.2 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 60.3 ± 7.6%, and a mean maximum left ventricular wall thickness of 17.2 (range, 12-25) mm. Most of the patients were in New York Heart Association class II (48.4%) or III (46.8%). In addition to being older than patients without ATTR-CA, patients with ATTR-CA had higher median NT-proBNP levels (3801 [2266-7132] vs 2391 [1141-4796] pg/mL; P = .003). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of ATTR-CA by sex (19.7% in men and 13.8% in women, P = .085). A genetic variant (ATTRv) was found in approximately 7% (4/56) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter nationwide study found that the prevalence of ATTR-CA was 16.8%, confirming it as a significant contributor to HFpEF in patients of both sexes with left ventricular hypertrophy older than 75 years.

How to Optimize Goal-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in Patients with Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with signs and symptoms from underlying cardiac abnormality and evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion on laboratory testing or other objective findings (Bozkurt et al. in Eur J Heart Fail 23:352-380, 2021). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), when heart failure is due to underlying reduction in ejection fraction to ≤ 40. The goal of this review is to briefly describe the mechanisms and benefits of the various pharmacological interventions described in the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guidelines focusing on Stage C: Symptomatic Heart Failure HFrEF, while providing basic guidance on safe use of these medications. RECENT FINDINGS: Use of medications from each class as recommended in the 2022 Guidelines can provide significant morbidity and mortality benefits for our patients. Despite advances in therapeutics for patients with HFrEF, patients are frequently under treated and more research is needed to help optimize management of these complicated patients.

A Rare Case of Cephalosporin Anaphylaxis-Induced Reverse Takotsubo.

This case report details an unusual occurrence of reverse takotsubo induced by cefazolin anaphylaxis. While anaphylactic reactions typically manifest with hypotension and bronchospasm, the development of takotsubo is a rare outcome. The patient experienced an episode of cefazolin-induced anaphylaxis during elective shoulder surgery, subsequently developing reverse takotsubo cardiomyopathy (rTTC) during her hospitalization. Initial testing showed a reduced heart function, with an ejection fraction (EF) dropping to 32% from a previously normal EF exceeding 50%. However, a follow-up heart catheterization three weeks later revealed a return to normal heart function. The patient received appropriate management for heart failure. By emphasizing the nuanced features and symptoms, we aim to enhance the recognition and management of this condition. Sharing such cases contributes to the medical community's knowledge and facilitates the advancement of strategies for diagnosing and managing anaphylaxis-induced reverse takotsubo.

Real-world experience of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in patients with heart failure and dialysis.

Introduction: Although angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has shown promise in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the treatment effect in HFrEF patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis is uncertain. This study aimed to examine the real-world effects of ARNI vs. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) in this subpopulation. Methods: This multi-institutional, retrospective study identified 349 HFrEF patients with ESRD on dialysis, who initiated either ARNI or ACEI/ARB therapy. Efficacy outcomes included rates of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and mortality, as well as changes in echocardiographic parameters. Safety outcomes encompassed hypotension and hyperkalemia. Treatment effects were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, with additional sensitivity analyses for robustness. Results: Out of 349 patients screened, 89 were included in the final analysis (42 in the ARNI group and 47 in the ACEI/ARB group). After 1 year of treatment, echocardiographic measures between the two groups were comparable. The primary composite rate of HHF or mortality was 20.6 events per 100 patient-years in the ARNI group and 26.1 in the ACEI/ARB group; the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.28-3.43, P = 0.97). Their safety outcomes did not differ significantly. Sensitivity analyses, including repetitive sampling, propensity score matching, and extended follow-up, corroborated these findings. Conclusion: ARNI has proven effective in treating HFrEF patients; however, significant benefits were not observed in these patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis compared with ACEI/ARB in this real-world cohort. Future research employing a more extended follow-up period, larger sample size, or randomized design is warranted to investigate the treatment effects in this subpopulation.

Epicardial adipose tissue volume and density are associated with heart failure with improved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (EF, HFimpEF) is a distinct HF subtype, characterized by left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and myocardial functional recovery. Multiple cardiometabolic factors are implicated in this process. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), emerging as an endocrine and paracrine organ, contributes to the onset and progression of HF. However, the relation between EAT and the incidence of HFimpEF is still unclear. METHODS: A total of 203 hospitalized HF patients with reduced EF (HFrEF, LVEF ≤ 40%) who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) during index hospitalization were consecutively enrolled between November 2011 and December 2022. Routine follow-up and repeat echocardiograms were performed. The incidence of HFimpEF was defined as (1) an absolute LVEF improvement ≥ 10% and (2) a second LVEF > 40% (at least 3 months apart). EAT volume and density were semiautomatically quantified on non-enhanced series of CCTA scans. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 8.6 (4.9 ~ 13.3) months, 104 (51.2%) patients developed HFimpEF. Compared with HFrEF patients, HFimpEF patients had lower EAT volume (115.36 [IQR 87.08 ~ 154.78] mL vs. 169.67 [IQR 137.22 ~ 218.89] mL, P < 0.001) and higher EAT density (-74.92 ± 6.84 HU vs. -78.76 ± 6.28 HU, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed lower EAT volume (OR: 0.885 [95%CI 0.822 ~ 0.947]) and higher density (OR: 1.845 [95%CI 1.023 ~ 3.437]) were both independently associated with the incidence of HFimpEF. Subgroup analysis revealed that the association between EAT properties and HFimpEF was not modified by HF etiology. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that lower EAT volume and higher EAT density are associated with development of HFimpEF. Therapies targeted at reducing EAT quantity and improving its quality might provide favorable effects on myocardial recovery in HF patients.

Dapagliflozin in heart failure and type 2 diabetes: Efficacy, cardiac and renal effects, safety.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF), especially HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), presents complex challenges, particularly in the aging population where it often coexists with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). AIM: To analyze the effect of dapagliflozin treatment on cardiac, renal function, and safety in patients with HFrEF combined with T2DM. METHODS: Patients with T2DM complicated with HFrEF who underwent treatment in our hospital from February 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed as the subjects of this study. The propensity score matching method was used, and a total of 102 eligible samples were scaled. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was evaluated at the end of the treatment, comparing the results of blood glucose, insulin, cardiac function, markers of myocardial injury, renal function indexes, and 6-min walk test (6MWT) before and after the treatment. We compared the occurrence of adverse effects on the treatment process of the two groups of patients. The incidence of adverse outcomes in patients within six months of treatment was counted. RESULTS: The overall clinical efficacy rate of patients in the study group was significantly higher than that of patients in the control group (P = 0.013). After treatment, the pancreatic beta-cell function index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and glomerular filtration rate of patients in the study group were significantly higher than control group (P < 0.001), while their fasting plasma glucose, 2-h postprandial glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin resistance index, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase-MB, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen were significantly lower than those of the control group. After treatment, patients in the study group had a significantly higher 6MWT than those in the control group (P < 0.001). Hypoglycemic reaction (P = 0.647), urinary tract infection (P = 0.558), gastrointestinal adverse effect (P = 0.307), respiratory disturbance (P = 0.558), and angioedema (P = 0.647) were not statistically different. There was no significant difference between the incidence of adverse outcomes between the two groups (P = 0.250). CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin significantly enhances clinical efficacy, cardiac and renal function, and ambulatory capacity in patients with HFrEF and T2DM without an increased risk of adverse effects or outcomes.

Echocardiographic Assessment of Recovered Patients with Mild COVID-19 Infection: A Case-Control Study.

Context: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been revealed as a severe illness with a wide-ranging cardiac manifestation and has a worldwide burden on the health-care system. Aims: Our aim in this study is to assess the impact of mild COVID-19 infection on cardiac function in patients without previous structural heart disease. Settings and Design: We evaluated 100 outpatients with a history of mild COVID-19 infection without needing hospitalization within 3 weeks to 3 months after recovery from the acute phase of the illness between August 2020 and July 2021. Subjects and Methods: The patients were compared with 105 healthy participants without a history of COVID-19 as the control group. All participants underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics 23. For all tests, P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Results: COVID-19 patients had higher global longitudinal strain (P = 0.001), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (P = 0.008), RV E' (P = 0.049), and RV A' (P = 0.003), while had lower septal tissue velocities (P = 0.01) and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) (P = 0.03). Abnormal EF (LVEF <55%) was noted in 19% of the COVID-19 patients and 8.6% of the control group (P = 0.03). Moderate or more diastolic dysfunction was noted in 10 COVID-19 patients but only in one participant in the control group (P = 0.005). Conclusions: Mild COVID-19 infection can result in cardiac functional and structural changes, even in patients without known previous structural heart disease. Echocardiography can be a useful modality for risk assessment and follow-up in patients with COVID-19.

Mavacamten in Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction.

Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction is a rare complication of ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This study presents an unusual case of a patient with HCM with severe RVOT obstruction that was relieved successfully through the use of mavacamten.

Incidence of Coronary Artery Disease After Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: A Hospital-based Study from East India.

Bradyarrhythmias, characterized by heart rates of <60 bpm due to conduction issues, carry risks of sudden cardiac death and falls. Pacemaker implantation is a standard treatment, but the interplay between bradyarrhythmias, coronary artery disease (CAD), and patient attributes requires further exploration. This study was a retrospective hospital record-based study that analyzed data from 699 patients who underwent pacemaker implantation for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias between February 2019 and February 2022. Clinical parameters, coronary angiography (CAG) findings, ejection fraction, and indications for pacemaker implantation were documented. The relationship between CAD severity, specific bradyarrhythmias, and ejection fraction was explored. Statistical analysis included chi-squared tests and t tests. The mean age of the study population (n = 699) was 66.75 years (male:female ratio, 70:30), with 77.2% having type 2 diabetes and 61.6% being hypertensive. The majority of patients had minor or non-obstructive CAD (61.8%), followed by normal CAG findings (25.75%) and obstructive CAD (12.45%). Complete heart block (CHB) was the primary indication for pacemaker implantation (55.2%), followed by sick sinus syndrome (22.3%). The results did not show any association between ejection fraction and CAG findings. Patients who presented with CHB had a higher incidence of obstructive CAD, indicating greater severity. This study sheds light on the intricate interplay between severe bradyarrhythmias, CAD, and patient characteristics. Our analysis revealed no statistical significance between obstructive CAD and the need for a permanent pacemaker. This makes us question our practice of maintaining a low threshold for coronary angiography during pacemaker implantation. The observed low yield and anticoagulation protocol reassure us of the choice to delay this diagnostic intervention. These insights can guide tailored management strategies, enhancing clinical care approaches for patients with severe bradyarrhythmias necessitating pacemaker implantation.

Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Important risk factors for the development of HFpEF are similar to risk factors for the progression of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and both conditions frequently coexist and thus is a distinct phenotype or a marker for advanced HF. Many patients with severe, symptomatic atrial secondary TR have been enrolled in current transcatheter device trials, and may represent patients at an advanced stage of HFpEF. Management of HFpEF thus may affect the pathophysiology of TR, and the physiologic changes that occur following transcatheter treatment of TR, may also impact symptoms and outcomes in patients with HFpEF. This review discusses these issues and suggests possible management strategies for these patients.

Predictive value of early-phase heart rate reduction for subsequent recovery of left ventricular systolic function in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

INTRODUCTION: Predictors of heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) remain to be fully elucidated. This study investigated the impact of heart rate and its change on the recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 398 outpatients who had a history of hospitalisation for heart failure, 138 subjects diagnosed as HFrEF (LVEF < 40%) on heart failure hospitalisation were enrolled and longitudinally surveyed. During follow-up periods more than one year, 64 and 46 patients were identified as HFrecEF (improved LVEF to ≥ 40% and its increase of ≥ 10 points) and persistent HFrEF, respectively. RESULTS: In the overall subjects, the reduction of heart rate through the observation periods was closely correlated with the improvement of LVEF (r = -0.508, p < 0.001). Heart rate on hospital admission for heart failure was markedly higher in patients with HFrecEF (112 ± 26 bpm) than in those with persistent HFrEF (90±18 bpm). Whereas heart rate at the first outpatient visit after discharge was already lower in the HFrecEF group (80 ± 13 vs. 85 ± 13 bpm in the persistent HFrEF group). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the decrease in heart rate from admission to the first visit after discharge was a significant determinant of HFrecEF (p < 0.001), independently of confounding factors such as ischemic heart disease and baseline LVEF and left ventricular dimension. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that heart rate reduction in the early phase after heart failure onset is a powerful independent predictor of the subsequent recovery of LVEF in HFrEF patients.

Verification of haemoglobin level to prevent worsening of prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients from the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry.

AIMS: Anaemia has been reported as poor predictor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of changes in haemoglobin (Hb) from discharge to 1 year after discharge on the prognosis using a lower cut-off value of Hb than the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: First, 547 HFpEF cases were divided into two groups, Hb < 11.0 g/dL (n = 218) and Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL (n = 329), according to Hb at discharge, and further were divided according to Hb 1 year after discharge into Hb < 11.0 g/dL (G1, n = 113), Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL (G2, n = 105), Hb < 11.0 g/dL (G3, n = 66), and Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL (G4, n = 263), respectively. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as composite of all-cause death and heart failure readmission after a visit 1 year after discharge. The cut-off value of Hb was analysed by the receiver operating characteristics curve that predicts MACE. We examined the incidence rate of MACE between G4 and other subgroups and verified predictors of improving or worsening anaemia and covarying factors with change in Hb. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, MACE was significantly higher in G3 with worsening anaemia from Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL to <11.0 g/dL than G4 with persistently Hb ≥ 11 g/dL (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 3.14 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-5.60], P < 0.001). MACE was not significantly different between G2 with improving anaemia from Hb < 11.0 g/dL to ≥ 11.0 g/dL and G4 (adjusted HR: 1.37 [95% CI, 0.68-2.75], P = 0.38). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of improving anaemia were male [odds ratio (OR): 0.45], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 10.3), prior heart failure hospitalization (OR: 0.38), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR: 1.04). Independent predictors of worsening anaemia were age (OR: 1.07), body mass index (BMI) (OR: 0.86), clinical frailty scale score (OR: 1.29), Hb at discharge (OR: 0.63), and use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker (OR: 2.76). In multivariate linear regression analysis, covarying factors with change in Hb were BMI (ß = -0.098), serum albumin (ß = 0.411), and total cholesterol (ß = 0.179). CONCLUSIONS: Change in haemoglobin after discharge using a lower cut-off value than WHO criteria has prognostic impact in patients with HFpEF.

Considerations in the Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Left Heart Disease.

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD) remains the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension globally. Etiologies include heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction and left-sided valvular heart diseases. Despite the increasing prevalence of PH-LHD, there remains a paucity of knowledge about the hemodynamic definition, diagnosis, treatment modalities, and prognosis among clinicians. Moreover, clinical trials have produced mixed results on the usefulness of pulmonary vasodilator therapies for PH-LHD. In this expert review, we have outlined the critical role of meticulous hemodynamic evaluation and provocative testing for cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Therapeutic strategies-pharmacologic, device-based, and surgical therapies used for managing PH-LHD-are also outlined. PH-LHD in advanced heart failure, and the role of mechanical circulatory support in PH-LHD is briefly explored. An in-depth understanding of PH-LHD by all clinicians is needed for improved recognition and outcomes among patients with PH-LHD.

Distribution and Prognostic Impact of Different Heart Failure Etiologies in Patients with Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVE: The study investigates the characteristics and prognostic impact of different heart failure (HF) etiologies in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). BACKGROUND: Data regarding the characterization of patients with HFmrEF and their outcomes is scarce. METHODS: Consecutive patients with HFmrEF (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction 41-49 % and signs and/or symptoms of HF) were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) were compared to patients without ischemic cardiomyopathy (non-ICM). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 months (median follow-up). Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses and propensity score matching. RESULTS: From a total of 1,832 patients hospitalized with HFmrEF, ICM was the most common HF etiology in 68.7 %, followed by hypertensive (9.7 %) and primary non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (NICM) (8.1 %). Within the entire study cohort, the presence of ICM was not associated with the risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.864; 95 % CI 0.723 - 1.031), however after multivariable adjustment (HR = 0.792; 95 % CI 0.646 - 0.972; p = 0.026) and propensity score matching (25.7% vs. 31.4 %; log rank p = 0.050), the presence of ICM was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality at 30 months compared to patients without ICM. CONCLUSION: ICM is the most common etiology of HF in HFmrEF and may be associated with favorable outcomes. This may be related to better adherence to pharmacological treatment and improved revascularization strategies for HFmrEF patients with ICM.

Sacubitril/Valsartan Improves Cardiac Function in Dialysis Patients.

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by the activation of adverse neurohormonal systems and a high mortality rate. Noteworthy, HF is a well-known complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), where dialysis patients are seven to eight times more likely to encounter cardiac arrest than the general population. Therefore, it is important to develop efficient treatments to improve cardiac function in dialysis patients and eventually reduce the cardiovascular death toll. Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is a dual inhibitor/blocker of the neprilysin and angiotensin II receptors, which exert cardioprotective effects among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF). Unfortunately, the drug is not approved for subjects with advanced CKD or dialysis patients due to safety concerns. The current study examined the cardiac effects of Sac/Val in HD patients. Administration of Sac/Val (100-400 mg/day) to 12 hemodialysis (HD) patients with HFrEF for six months gradually improved ejection fraction (EF) independently of morphological changes in cardiac geometry, as assessed by echocardiography (ECHO), and hemodynamic alterations. Interestingly, the Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (Kansas City KCCQ-12) revealed that quality of life significantly improved after Sac/Val treatment. No major adverse effects were reported in the present study, supporting the safety of Sac/Val at least in these patients and for the applied follow-up period. Collectively, these findings support the use of Sac/Val as a cardioprotective agent in both HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Yet, a more comprehensive study is required to establish these findings and to extend the follow-up period for 12 months in order to solidify these encouraging results.

Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Literature Review, Reflection and Outlook.

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome caused by structural or functional dysfunction of the ventricular filling or blood supply. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent predictor of mortality for HF. The increase in prevalence, co-morbidity and hospitalization rates of both DM and HF has further fueled the possibility of overlapping disease pathology between the two. For decades, antidiabetic drugs that are known to definitively increase the risk of HF are the thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and saxagliptin in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, and insulin, which causes sodium and water retention, and whether metformin is effective or safe for HF is not clear. Notably, sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and partial glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) all achieved positive results for HF endpoints, with SGLT2 inhibitors in particular significantly reducing the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Further understanding of the mutual pathophysiological mechanisms between HF and DM may facilitate the detection of novel therapeutic targets to improve the clinical outcome. This review focuses on the association between HF and DM, emphasizing the efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs and HF treatment. In addition, recent therapeutic advances in HF and the important mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)/vericiguat contribute to the benefits of HF are summarized.