Link between isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis and intrauterine cancer site in early stage endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Missing occult para-aortic lymph node metastasis is one of the primary concerns of sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the relationship between intrauterine cancer site and isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis to tailor treatment and reduce the false negative rate of the sentinel lymph node procedure. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter, case control study was performed in four international centers. All patients with positive lymph nodes who had complete surgical staging with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, between January 2013 and December 2023, were included. Detailed descriptions of the cancer location within the uterine cavity on the cranio-caudal plane and the myometrial wall involvement on the cranio-caudal and ventro-dorsal planes were collected, as were clinical data and cancer histological features. Patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis were allocated to group 1; patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis and those with both pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were allocated to group 2. The groups were compared according to the variables collected. RESULTS: 200 preoperative early stage endometrial cancer patients with postoperative International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009/2023 stage IIIC1/IIIC2 were included in our study: 42 patients (21%) with isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis were allocated to group 1 and the remaining patients to group 2. The two groups had comparable clinical and pathological characteristics (p>0.05): mean age was 66.5±10.3 (group 1) and 63.5±11.9 (group 2); endometrioid histotype was the predominant one for both groups (50%); most patients had myometrial infiltration >50% (80.9% and 79.7%), grade 3 (61.9% and 63.9%), and lymph vascular space invasion (78.5% and 82.2%). Cancers involving the fundal uterine cavity, the fundal myometrial wall, or the anterior myometrial wall were 3.11 (1.04-9.27), 3.03 (1.12-8.21), and 2.12 (0.77-5.80) times more likely to metastasize only to para-aortic lymph nodes compared with cancers located in other uterine sites. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the intrauterine location of the cancer determined the site of lymph node metastasis. When the tumor involved the fundus (cavity or wall) and infiltrated exclusively the anterior wall, the baseline risk of spreading only into the para-aortic area increased significantly in selected patients at risk of nodal disease.

Comparison of Endometrial Polyp Characteristics in Transvaginal Sonography and Hysteroscopy in Predicting Endometrial Malignancies in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women.

Background: Hysteroscopy is known as the gold standard for endometrial polyps diagnosis and its findings on vascularity, size, and number of polyps can indicate malignancy, but it is a relatively expensive method with some complications. Ultrasound is a common part of the gynecological examination, and with technological advances, its ability to predict pathological outcomes has increased. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing the characteristics of endometrial polyps. Materials and Methods: This diagnostic value study was performed on 300 premenopausal and postmenopausal women over 40 years of age with endometrial polyps referred to Alzahra and Beheshti hospitals in Isfahan. The characteristics of endometrial polyps were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy and biopsy specimens were sent for pathological evaluations. Results: In this study, 103 premenopausal women and 197 postmenopausal women were evaluated. Malignancy was confirmed by pathology in 4 premenopausal women (2%) and 2 postmenopausal women (2%). In both hysteroscopy and ultrasound methods, the frequency of vascularity was significantly different in postmenopausal and premenopausal women, but the other features of the polyp were not significantly different in them. Ultrasonic sensitivity in detecting the presence of vascularity, polyps larger than 1.5 mm, more than 1 polyp, and the presence of pedicle were 39.04, 57.38%, 91.93 and 94.95%, respectively, its specificity were 98.94, 36.47, 99.57 and 98.89% respectively. Conclusion: A comparison of the characteristics of polyps in both ultrasound and hysteroscopy methods shows that hysteroscopy has been more effective in diagnosing malignancy and ultrasound has not have acceptable sensitivity in diagnosing size and vascularity.

A randomized controlled trial on the oncologic outcomes of use of the intrauterine manipulator in the treatment of apparent uterine-confined endometrial carcinoma: the MANEC Trial.

BACKGROUND: The intrauterine manipulator used during a hysterectomy for endometrial cancer has been suggested as a reason for worsening oncologic outcomes. However, only a few non-randomized retrospective studies have investigated this association. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To compare 4-year recurrence-free survival in the group of patients who undergo hysterectomy using an intrauterine manipulator with that of those who undergo hysterectomy without it. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Patients with endometrial cancer who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with an intrauterine manipulator would have a lower recurrence-free survival than patients who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy without a manipulator. TRIAL DESIGN: Multicenter, parallel arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Adult women diagnosed with apparently uterine-confined endometrial cancer of any histology are eligible. We exclude women who had synchronous or previous (<5 years) invasive cancer, had a WHO performance score >2, and had inadequate baseline organ function. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: 4-Year recurrence-free survival defined as any relapse or death related to endometrial cancer or treatment calculated from randomization to the date of the first recurrence-free survival event. SAMPLE SIZE: With an accrual time of 4 years, a minimum follow-up length of 4 years, and a two-sided type I error of 0.05, we need to enroll 515 women per arm to have a statistical power of 80% to reject the null hypothesis (HR for recurrence=1), assuming that patients who undergo hysterectomy with the use of the intrauterine manipulator have a 3-year recurrence rate of 12.5% and without the use of the intrauterine manipulator of 8.5% (HR for recurrence=1.50), and that 5% of patients are lost at follow-up in each arm, with a median time of 24 months. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Accrual completion is expected in 2028, and result presentation in 2032. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov ID NCT05687084.

GnRH-a-based fertility-sparing treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized designed clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Around 4% of women receive an endometrial cancer diagnosis before turning 40, mainly those without prior childbirth experience and a strong desire to preserve their ability to conceive. Consequently, for young patients diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early endometrial carcinoma (EC), a fertility-preserving approach employing high-dose oral progesterone has been adopted. However, previous research has shown a notable relapse rate. Furthermore, the extended use of substantial oral progesterone doses may hinder ovarian function and raise the risk of weight gain, liver issues, blood clotting, and breast cancer. We previously assessed the clinical effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) based re-treatment for women with EC and AEH who did not respond to oral progestin therapy but achieved favorable treatment results and reproductive outcomes. METHODS: This study will be an open-label, two-armed, randomized, investigator-initiated multicenter trial evaluating the combination of GnRH-a with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or the combination of GnRH-a with an aromatase inhibitor (comprising a subcutaneous GnRH-a injection every 4 weeks and daily oral letrozole 2.5 mg). A total of 226 participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of GnRH-a-based re-treatment in achieving a complete response (CR) at 24 weeks for patients with AEH or EC. Secondary objectives include assessing the pregnancy rate 12 weeks after treatment, as well as post-treatment pregnancy outcomes and the rate of recurrence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and from boards at five other institutions. The trial will adhere to the principles outlined in the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and follow Good Clinical Practice standards. The trial results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective evidence supporting conservative treatment for EC and AEH is limited. There is a need for new approaches that can achieve higher CR rates with fewer side effects. This trial will assess the effectiveness of GnRH-a-based fertility-sparing treatment in obese women and recurrent patients, offering a promising alternative for patients with EC and AEH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200067099. Registered on December 27, 2022.

Association of insulin-like growth factor II mrna-binding protein 3 (IMP3) expression with prognostic and morphological factors in endometrial cancer.

Objective: Endometrial cancer (EC) is a heterogeneous disease with recurrence rates ranging from 15 to 20%. The discrimination of cases with a worse prognosis aims, in part, to reduce the length of surgical staging in cases with a better prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the association between Insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) expression and prognostic and morphological factors in EC. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional, analytical study included 79 EC patients - 70 endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) and 9 serous carcinoma (SC) - and 74 benign endometrium controls. IMP3 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry-based TMA (Tissue Microarray), and the results were associated with morphological and prognostic factors, including claudins 3 and 4, estrogen and progesterone receptors, TP53, and KI67. Results: IMP3 expression was significantly higher in SC compared to EEC in both extent (p<0.001) and intensity (p=0.044). It was also significantly associated with worse prognostic factors, including degree of differentiation (p=0.024, p<0.001), staging (p<0.001; p<0.001) and metastasis (p=0.002; p<0.001). IMP3 expression was also significant in extent (p=0.002) in endometrial tumors compared with controls. In addition, protein TP53 and KI67 showed significant associations in extent and intensity, respectively. Conclusion: IMP3 expression was associated with worse prognostic factors studied. These findings suggest that IMP3 may be a potential biomarker for EC poorer prognosis.

Impact of molecular classification on recurrence risk in endometrial cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the distribution of molecular classes and their impact on the risk of recurrence in endometrial cancer patients with lymph node metastasis at the time of primary surgery. METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients with lymph node micrometastasis or macrometastasis (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IIIC) after surgical staging at five referral centers worldwide from October 2013 to September 2022 who underwent molecular classification were identified. Endometrial cancers were categorized into four molecular classes: POLE mutated, mismatch repair deficient, p53 abnormal, and no specific molecular profile. Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models (univariate and multivariate) were conducted to evaluate the relationship between molecular class and 5-year recurrence free survival. RESULTS: 131 patients were included: 55 (42.0%) no specific molecular profile, 46 (35.1%) mismatch repair deficient, 1 (0.8%) POLE mutated, and 29 (22.1%) p53 abnormal. During a 5 year follow-up period, 50 (38.2%) patients experienced a recurrence with a median time of 1.2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5-1.8). Median follow-up for the remaining 81 patients was 3.1 years (IQR 1.3-4.5). Survival analysis revealed a significant difference in recurrence-free survival between no specific molecular profile, mismatch repair deficient, and p53 abnormal classes (log rank p<0.01). In a model adjusted for type of lymph node metastasis and tumor grade, the molecular class did not retain significance (p=0.13), while in a model adjusted for type of lymph node metastasis and adjuvant therapy, the molecular class retained significance (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Among patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer, POLE mutated tumors exhibited an extremely low prevalence, with no specific molecular profile emerging as the largest molecular subgroup. Despite the significant difference in recurrence-free survival between molecular classes, conventional histopathologic parameters retained crucial prognostic value. Our findings highlight the necessity of integrating molecular classes with pathological characteristics, rather than considering them in isolation as crucial prognostic factors in stage IIIC endometrial cancer.

Artificial intelligence model for enhancing the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in detecting endometrial cancer and endometrial atypical hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: Transvaginal ultrasound is typically the initial diagnostic approach in patients with postmenopausal bleeding for detecting endometrial atypical hyperplasia/cancer. Although transvaginal ultrasound demonstrates notable sensitivity, its specificity remains limited. The objective of this study was to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound through the integration of artificial intelligence. By using transvaginal ultrasound images, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence based automated segmentation model and an artificial intelligence based classifier model. METHODS: Patients with postmenopausal bleeding undergoing transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial sampling at Mayo Clinic between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively included. Manual segmentation of images was performed by four physicians (readers). Patients were classified into cohort A (atypical hyperplasia/cancer) and cohort B (benign) based on the pathologic report of endometrial sampling. A fully automated segmentation model was developed, and the performance of the model in correctly identifying the endometrium was compared with physician made segmentation using similarity metrics. To develop the classifier model, radiomic features were calculated from the manually segmented regions-of-interest. These features were used to train a wide range of machine learning based classifiers. The top performing machine learning classifier was evaluated using a threefold approach, and diagnostic accuracy was assessed through the F1 score and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). RESULTS: 302 patients were included. Automated segmentation-reader agreement was 0.79±0.21 using the Dice coefficient. For the classification task, 92 radiomic features related to pixel texture/shape/intensity were found to be significantly different between cohort A and B. The threefold evaluation of the top performing classifier model showed an AUC-ROC of 0.90 (range 0.88-0.92) on the validation set and 0.88 (range 0.86-0.91) on the hold-out test set. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (range 0.77-0.94) and 0.86 (range 0.81-0.94), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We trained an artificial intelligence based algorithm to differentiate endometrial atypical hyperplasia/cancer from benign conditions on transvaginal ultrasound images in a population of patients with postmenopausal bleeding.

Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Robotic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer vs. Non-Cancer Patients.

Introduction: Vaginal cuff dehiscence (CD) after hysterectomy is a rare but serious complication of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy (RLTH). The authors of this study aimed to compare the incidence and risk factors of CD following RLTH among patients with and without endometrial cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included women aged 18 years or older who underwent RLTH by two surgeons at a single institution from 2013 to 2018. Patients with conversion to laparotomy, recent chemotherapy or radiation, or non-uterine malignancy were excluded. Data were abstracted from medical records. Results: Of 950 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 50.7% had endometrial cancer. CD was reported in 2.5% of all patients. While adjusting for cancer status, age, sexual activity after surgery, distance from home to location of surgery, and time interval from surgery to loss to followup, obese patients were 25.1% less likely than non-obese patients to experience CD (62.5 vs. 37.5, p = 0.01). Surgeon A had a 2.8 times higher CD rate than surgeon B (70.8 vs. 29.2, p = 0.03). No other factors predicted CD. Conclusions: Endometrial cancer patients were not at greater risk of experiencing CD compared to non-cancer patients. Surgeon differences and body mass index (BMI) were associated with CD risk, with normal BMI patients at higher risk.

Sentinel node mapping decreases the risk of failed detection of isolated positive para-aortic lymph node in endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Isolated positive para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer is an uncommon event, ranging from 1% to 3%. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping on the risk of isolated positive para-aortic lymph node metastasis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a series of 426 patients who underwent SLN mapping with at least one SLN detected from January 2013 to December 2021 (SLN group) compared with a historical series of 209 cases who underwent a systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy between June 2007 and April 2015 (LND group). Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis recurrences were included in the SLN group analysis. RESULTS: In the SLN group, 168 cases (39.4%) had backup systematic lymphadenectomy, and 56 (13.1%) had positive lymph nodes compared with 34 (16.3%) in LND group (p=0.18). The SLN group had higher rates of minimally invasive surgeries (p<0.001) and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (p<0.001). Moreover, SLN group had fewer other uterine risk factors, such as high-grade tumors (p<0.001), and deep myometrial invasion (p<0.001). We found that SLN mapped outside the pelvis at pre-sacral, common iliac areas, and para-aortic regions in 2.8% (n=12), 11.5% (n=49), and 1.6% (n=7) of cases, respectively. Overall, 52 (12.2%) patients had positive SLNs, and 3 (5.7%) positive SLNs were found outside the pelvis-one in the pre-sacral region, one in the common iliac area, and one in the para-aortic region. An isolated para-aortic lymph node was found in only 2 (0.5%) cases in the SLN group compared with 7 (3.3%) cases in the LND group (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: SLN protocol accurately predicts lymph node status and may decrease the risk of failed identification of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis compared with systematic lymphadenectomy.

SENECA study: staging endometrial cancer based on molecular classification.

OBJECTIVE: Management of endometrial cancer is advancing, with accurate staging crucial for guiding treatment decisions. Understanding sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement rates across molecular subgroups is essential. To evaluate SLN involvement in early-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 I-II) endometrial cancer, considering molecular subtypes and new European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) risk classification. METHODS: The SENECA study retrospectively reviewed data from 2139 women with stage I-II endometrial cancer across 66 centers in 16 countries. Patients underwent surgery with SLN assessment following ESGO guidelines between January 2021 and December 2022. Molecular analysis was performed on pre-operative biopsies or hysterectomy specimens. RESULTS: Among the 2139 patients, the molecular subgroups were as follows: 272 (12.7%) p53 abnormal (p53abn, 1191 (55.7%) non-specific molecular profile (NSMP), 581 (27.2%) mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), 95 (4.4%) POLE mutated (POLE-mut). Tracer diffusion was detected in, at least one side, in 97.2% of the cases; with a bilateral diffusion observed in 82.7% of the cases. By ultrastaging (90.7% of the cases) or one-step nucleic acid amplification (198 (9.3%) of the cases), 205 patients were identified with affected sentinel lymph nodes, representing 9.6% of the sample. Of these, 139 (67.8%) had low-volume metastases (including micrometastases, 42.9%; and isolated tumor cells, 24.9%) while 66 (32.2%) had macrometastases. Significant differences in SLN involvement were observed between molecular subtypes, with p53abn and MMRd groups having the highest rates (12.50% and 12.40%, respectively) compared with NSMP (7.80%) and POLE-mut (6.30%), (p=0.004); (p53abn, OR=1.69 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.56), p=0.014; MMRd, OR=1.67 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.31), p=0.002). Differences were also noted among ESGO risk groups (2.84% for low-risk patients, 6.62% for intermediate-risk patients, 21.63% for high-intermediate risk patients, and 22.51% for high-risk patients; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals significant differences in SLN involvement among patients with early-stage endometrial cancer based on molecular subtypes. This underscores the importance of considering molecular characteristics for accurate staging and optimal management decisions.

Survival Difference of Endometrial Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Receiving Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with and without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Although several studies have been completed to investigate the effect of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in endometrial cancer with peritoneal metastasis (ECPM), a direct comparison was not performed previously. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the suspected additional survival benefits of CRS plus HIPEC over CRS only. Twenty-one and ten studies with a total number of 1116 and 152 cases investigating CRS only and CRS plus HIPEC were identified, respectively. When all articles were analyzed, the 1-year survival rate was 17.60% higher for CRS plus HIPEC (82.28% vs. 64.68%; p = 0.0102). The same tendency was observed for the 2-year (56.07% vs. 36.95%; difference: 19.12%; p = 0.0014), but not for the 5-year (21.88% vs. 16.45%; difference: 5.43%; p = 0.3918) survival rates. The same clinical significance, but statistically less strong observations, could be made if only the studies published after 2010 were investigated (1-year survival rate: 12.08% and p = 0.0648; 2-year survival rate: 10.90% and p = 0.0988). CRS remains one of the core elements of ECPM treatment, but the addition of HIPEC to CRS can increase the positive clinical outcome, especially in the first 2 years.

Colombian consensus for the molecular diagnosis of endometrial cancer / Consenso colombiano para el diagnóstico molecular del cáncer de endometrio.

Objective: The Cancer Genome Atlas research program (TCGA) developed the molecular classification for endometrial cancer with prognostic and therapeutic utility, which was replaced by the ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer) classification by consensus and international guidelines due to its high cost. This article aims to present national recommendations from an expert consensus that allows unification and implementation of the molecular classification for women with endometrial cancer nationwide, with a rational use of resources and technology. Methods: Consensus of 36 experts in clinical oncology, oncological gynecology, pathology, and genetics, with clinical practice in the national territory. The leader group performed a literature review and structuring of questions rated 1 to 9 points. A modified nominal group technique was used. There was a face-to-face meeting with master presentations, deliberative dialogue, and Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) questionnaire voting with analysis and discussion of responses. The non-consensual responses led to a second round of voting. The final manuscript was finally prepared and revised. Results: Seven recommendations were formulated integrating the panelist responses based on evidence, but adjusted to the Colombian context and reality. Recommendation 1. The molecular classification is recommended in all the endometrial cancers using the immunohistochemistry markers as subrogated results from the molecular profile initially proposed in the TCGA classification. Recommendation 2. The sequential test strategy is recommended, starting with the immunohistochemistry markers (p53, MLH1, MSH 2, MSH6, PMS2) simultaneously in all the patients, defining to request POLE (DNA polymerase epsilon) (if available) according to the risk classification based on the surgical piece. Recommendation 3. It is recommended, that the gynecologist oncologist should be the one to request the POLE (if available) according to the final pathology report. This test must be requested for all endometrial cancers stage I-II, except in low risk (stage IA low grade endometrioid histology without linfovascular invasion normal p53) and, stages III-IV without residual disease, without affecting the request of subrogated immunohistochemistry molecular markers upon histology. The consensus proposes that the POLE is requested after the immunohistochemistry and according to the categories in the risk classification established by the 2020 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines. Recommendation 4. It is recommended to perform immunohistochemistry for hormonal receptors for all women with endometrial cancer and the HER2 in patients with p53abn, simultaneously with the others immunohistochemistry markers. Recommendation 5. It is recommended to perform the immunohistochemistry markers (p53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 y PMS2) in an initial endometrial biopsy or curettage when the specimen is adequate and available. In case the initial immunohistochemistry is inconclusive, or there are histological discrepancies between the initial and definitive pathology, it is recommended to repeat the molecular profile in the surgical pathology. The immunohistochemistry markers must be reported in the pathology report according to the CAP (College of American Pathologists) recommendations, independently of the type of sample. Recommendation 6. It is recommended to perform MLH1 promoter methylation testing in patients who exhibit loss of expression of MLH1 in immunohistochemistry whether it is accompanied or not with loss of expression of PMS2. All the patients with deficient MMR (mismatch repair), should be sent for genetic counseling to rule out Lynch syndrome. Recommendation 7. It is recommended to consider the molecular classification in addition to the classical histopathological criteria when making adjuvant judgments, as incorporated by the classification of prognostic groups of the 2020 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines. Conclusions: It is necessary to implement the molecular classification of endometrial cancer in clinical practice in accordance to the Colombian context, due to its prognostic and probably predictive value. This will enable the characterization of the Colombian population in order to offer individualized guided treatments. This is an academic and nonregulatory document.

Objetivos: el programa Cancer Genome Atlas Research (TCGA) desarrolló la clasificación molecular para cáncer endometrial con utilidad pronóstica y terapéutica, la cual ha sido reemplazada por consensos y guías internacionales por la clasificación ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer) debido a su alto costo. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar recomendaciones a nivel nacional derivadas de un consenso de expertos que permitan unificar e implementar la clasificación molecular para mujeres con cáncer endometrial, mediante un uso racional de recursos y tecnología. Materiales y métodos: consenso de 36 expertos en oncología clínica, ginecología oncológica, patología y genética con práctica clínica en el territorio nacional. El grupo líder realizó una revisión de la literatura y estructuración de preguntas calificadas de 1 a 9 puntos. Se utilizó la técnica de grupo nominal modificada. Se efectuaron reuniones presenciales con presentaciones magistrales, diálogo deliberativo y votación de cuestionario Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) con análisis y discusión de respuestas. Las respuestas no consensuadas se llevaron a una segunda ronda de votación. Finalmente, se elaboró y revisó el manuscrito final. Resultados: se formularon siete recomendaciones integrando las respuestas de las panelistas basadas en evidencia, pero ajustadas al contexto y a la realidad colombiana. Recomendación 1. Se recomienda realizar la clasificación molecular en todos los carcinomas endometriales utilizando los marcadores de inmunohistoquímica como resultados subrogados del perfil molecular inicialmente propuesto en la clasificación del TCGA. Recomendación 2. Se recomienda la estrategia secuencial de testeo iniciando por los marcadores de inmunohistoquímica (p53, MLH1, MSH 2, MSH6, PMS2) simultáneamente en todas las pacientes, y definir la solicitud del POLE (polimerasa épsilon del DNA) (si se encuentra disponible) de forma diferida de acuerdo con la clasificación de riesgo basado en la pieza quirúrgica. Recomendación 3. Se recomienda que sea el ginecólogo oncólogo quien solicite el POLE (si se encuentra disponible) de acuerdo con el reporte de patología definitivo. Esta prueba se debe solicitar a todos los cánceres endometriales de estadio I-II, excepto los de bajo riesgo (estadio IA endometrioide de bajo grado sin invasión linfovascular p53 normal) y estadio III-IV sin enfermedad residual, sin afectar la solicitud de los marcadores moleculares subrogados por inmunohistoquímica de acuerdo con la histología. El consenso propone que la solicitud del POLE se realice posterior a la inmunohistoquímica y de acuerdo con la clasificación del riesgo según las categorías establecidas por la guía ESGO/ESTRO/ESP del 2020. Recomendación 4. Se recomienda realizar simultáneamente con los otros marcadores de inmunohistoquímica la prueba para receptores hormonales en todas las pacientes con cáncer endometrial y el HER2 en pacientes con p53abn. Recomendación 5. Se recomienda que los marcadores de inmunohistoquímica (p53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 y PMS2) se realicen en la biopsia/legrado endometrial inicial cuando la muestra es adecuada y está disponible. En caso de inmunohistoquímica inicial no concluyente, o discrepancias histológicas entre la patología inicial y definitiva, se recomienda repetir el perfil molecular en la patología quirúrgica. Los marcadores de inmunohistoquímica deben reportarse en el informe de patología de acuerdo con las recomendaciones del CAP (College of American Pathologists), independientemente del tipo de muestra. Recomendación 6. Se recomienda realizar estudio de metilación de promotor de MLH1 en pacientes con pérdida de expresión de MLH1 en la inmunohistoquímica, acompañado o no de pérdida de expresión de PMS2. Todas las pacientes con déficit de MMR (mismatch repair), deben ser enviadas a genética para descartar síndrome de Lynch. Recomendación 7. Se recomienda tener en cuenta la clasificación molecular, además de los criterios histopatológicos clásicos para la toma de decisiones de adyuvancia, tal como los incorpora la clasificación de los grupos pronósticos de la guía ESGO/ ESTRO/ESP del 2020. Conclusiones: es necesario implementar la clasificación molecular de cáncer de endometrio en la práctica clínica acorde al contexto colombiano, dado su valor pronóstico y posiblemente predictivo. Esto permitirá la caracterización de la población colombiana para ofrecer tratamientos guiados de manera individualizada. Se trata de un documento académico y no regulatorio.

Lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival in clinical stage III endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether performing a lymph node dissection during hysterectomy improves overall survival in patients with clinical stage III endometrial cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify all patients with clinical stage III endometrial cancer who had undergone pre-operative chemotherapy as first course of treatment followed by hysterectomy with or without lymph node dissection between the years 2004 and 2020. Univariable and multivariable models were performed to investigate prognostic factors on overall survival. RESULTS: This study analyzed 2882 patients with clinical stage III endometrial cancer who received upfront chemotherapy. Among those who underwent lymph node dissection, 38% had positive lymph nodes. Factors found to be independently associated with improved survival included lymph node dissection (p<0.001), adjuvant radiation (p<0.001), histology (p<0.001), tumor grade (p<0.001), pathologic node status (p<0.001), age (p<0.001), type of insurance (p=0.027), and race (p<0.001). Patients who underwent lymph node dissection at time of hysterectomy had a significantly better overall survival (107 vs 85 months; p<0.001). Multivariate and propensity score analyses robustly demonstrated that lymph node dissection significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84, p<0.001), even among patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that performing lymph node dissection at the time of hysterectomy is associated with improved overall survival in all patients with stage III endometrial cancer who receive upfront chemotherapy, regardless of age, race, insurance status, histologic subtype, tumor grade, pathologic node status, adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. Notably, patients with high-risk disease may particularly benefit from this approach.

A case report and literature review: A 19-year-old with endometrial carcinoma treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate. Importance of the medical interview and endometrial examination.

A 19-year-old woman had stage IA endometrial carcinoma treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate and experienced a recurrence. This patient's experience illustrates the importance of a thorough history and endometrial assessment in younger patients.

The clinical landscape of antibody-drug conjugates in endometrial cancer.

Clinical outcomes remain challenging in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer due to tumor heterogeneity and therapy resistance. Antibody-drug conjugates are a novel class of cancer therapeutics, representing a promising treatment option for endometrial cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates consist of a high-affinity antibody linked to a cytotoxic payload through a stable linker. After binding to specific antigens on tumor cells, the drug is internalized, and the payload is released. In addition, the free intracellular drug may be released outside the target cell through a 'bystander effect' and kill neighboring cells, which is crucial in treating malignancies characterized by heterogeneous biomarker expression like endometrial cancer.This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current clinical landscape of antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of endometrial cancer. We conducted a thorough analysis of recent clinical trials focusing on efficacy, safety profiles, and the mechanisms by which antibody-drug conjugates target endometrial cancer. We focused particularly on the most promising antibody-drug conjugate targets in endometrial cancer under clinical investigation, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), folate receptor alpha (FRα), trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (TROP2), and B7-H4. We also briefly comment on the challenges, including the emergence of resistance mechanisms, and future development directions (especially agents targeting multiple antigens, combinatorial strategies, and sequential use of agents targeting the same antigen but using different payloads) in antibody-drug conjugate therapy for endometrial cancer.

Longitudinal Analysis of the Overall Survival Rates and Transitional Probabilities of Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: This investigation delineated the survival rates and transitional probability trends of patients with endometrial cancer. This information is pivotal for optimizing patient management and counseling strategies. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients diagnosed with stage I or II endometrial cancer between November 2006 and October 2012 and those diagnosed with stage III or IV endometrial cancer between January 2012 and May 2017 at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Our examination included baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and adjuvant therapy data. Survival rates and transitional probabilities were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method for survival curve construction and Markov models, respectively. RESULTS: After exclusions, 229 individuals with early-stage endometrial cancer and 119 with advanced-stage histologically verified endometrial cancer were included in the final cohort. Throughout a median follow-up duration of 12.8 years, the 5-year overall survival rates were 89.05% for the early-stage cohort and 50.42% for the advanced-stage cohort. The transitional probability analysis revealed an elevated likelihood of achieving a curative state in early-stage patients, contrasting with a greater propensity for disease progression or distant metastasis in advanced-stage patients. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study offer critical insights into the overall survival rates and transitional probabilities of endometrial cancer patients. These insights underscore the importance of strategies focused on preventing recurrence and enhancing treatment. Moreover, the results serve as a cornerstone for clinicians in devising individualized treatment plans and facilitating cost-effective analyses in the context of endometrial cancer care.