Extent and Boundaries of Lymph Node Stations During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Survey Among Dutch Esophageal Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND) and the anatomic boundaries per lymph node station (LNS) during minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer remain a topic of debate. This study investigated the opinion of Dutch esophageal cancer surgeons on their routine LND extent and anatomic boundaries per LNS during MIE. METHODS: In April 2023, an English web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted. In each of the 15 Dutch hospitals performing MIE, two MIE surgeons were asked to participate. The routine LND extent (quantity, specific LNS) for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma, (dis)agreement with the TIGER definition, and anatomic boundaries for each LNS in six directions were queried. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 24 Dutch MIE surgeons (80% response rate). Consensus on the routine LND extent ( ≥ 85% of the participating surgeons) included the left and right paracardial, left gastric artery, celiac trunk, proximal splenic artery, common hepatic artery, subcarinal middle mediastinal paraoesophageal, lower mediastinal paraoesophageal, pulmonary ligament, and upper mediastinal paraoesophageal LNSs. Other LNSs were not widely considered routine. Although, certain anatomic boundaries were consistent among the surgeons, the majority varied, even when they agreed on the TIGER definition. CONCLUSION: Significant variations in surgical practice among Dutch esophageal surgeons regarding their routine extent of LND and anatomic boundaries of LNSs during MIE were demonstrated. Variation may have an impact on clinical outcomes, hampering uniform treatment strategies and hindering comparison of performance assessments. This study highlighted the need for an international follow-up study toward one uniform defined LND during MIE for esophageal cancer.

Enhanced Recovery Protocol Versus Conventional Care in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy for Cancer: Advantages in Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and conventional care in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer, which have not previously been compared. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included prospective PRO data from August 2019 to June 2021. Clinical outcomes included perioperative complications and postoperative length of stay (PLOS). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and esophagus-specific module (QLQ-OES18) preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively. Mixed-effects models were used to longitudinally compare quality of life (QOL) scores between the two modes. RESULTS: Patients undergoing conventional care and ERAS were analyzed (n = 348 and 109, respectively). The ERAS group had fewer overall complications, pneumonia, arrhythmia, and a shorter PLOS than the conventional group, and outperformed the conventional group in five functional QLQ-C30 domains and five symptom QLQ-OES18 domains, including less dysphagia (p < 0.0001), trouble talking (p = 0.0006), and better eating (p < 0.0001). These advantages persisted for 3 months postoperatively. For the cervical circular stapled anastomosis, the initial domains and duration of benefit were reduced in the ERAS group. CONCLUSIONS: The ERAS protocol has significant advantages over conventional care in terms of clinical outcomes, lowering postoperative symptom burden, and improving functional QOL in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. Selection of the optimal technique for cervical anastomosis is a key operative component of ERAS that maintains the symptom domains and duration of the advantages of PROs.

Understanding and Managing Metabolic Deficiencies Post Bariatric and Esophagectomy Surgeries: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Gastrectomy and esophagectomy are the most performed surgeries in the treatment of both esophageal and gastric cancers. The type of esophagectomy depends on the type of malignancy, site of the tumor, criteria of resection, and field of resection. The three standard approaches to esophagectomy are the transhiatal approach, the left thoracoabdominal approach, and a three-stage procedure. The transhiatal approach involves abdominal and cervical incisions, while the left thoracoabdominal approach is a one-stage procedure that utilizes a single incision exposing the dissection field. The Ivor Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies are two-stage and three-stage surgeries that include laparotomy with right thoracotomy. Malabsorption often emerges as a significant postoperative complication following esophagectomy and gastrectomy surgeries. Malnutrition linked with these cancers has detrimental effects, including heightened rates of postoperative complications, elevated infection risks, delayed wound healing, reduced tolerance to treatment, diminished quality of life, and heightened mortality rates. Our narrative review summarizes and sheds light on solutions to treat malabsorption disorders and malnutrition after gastric bypass surgery. These solutions include methods such as adjustments, supplements, and treatment. Although more research is needed to confirm their effectiveness, these methods indicate potential for lowering the impact on patients' diets. By considering the beneficial implications of these effects and considering solutions, we aim to improve the management of these adverse effects, ultimately improving the overall health and postoperative outcomes of patients.

Open left diaphragm method enables safe surgery with a good visual field in a laparoscopic transhiatal approach for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma laparoscopic transhiatal reconstruction via an open left diaphragm method.

BACKGROUND: Despite being oncologically acceptable for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with an esophageal invasion length of 3-4 cm, the transhiatal approach has not yet become a standard method given the difficulty of reconstruction in a narrow space and the risk of severe anastomotic leakage. This study aimed to clarify the safety and feasibility of the open left diaphragm method during the transhiatal approach for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent proximal or total gastrectomy with lower esophagectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinomas with esophageal invasion via the laparoscopic transhiatal approach with or without the open left diaphragm method from April 2013 to December 2021. RESULTS: Overall, 42 and 13 patients did and did not undergo surgery with the open left diaphragm method, respectively. The median operative time was only slightly shorter in the open left diaphragm group than in the non-open left diaphragm group (369 vs. 482 min; P = 0.07). Grade ≥ II postoperative respiratory complications were significantly less common in the open left diaphragm group than in the non-open left diaphragm group (17% vs. 46%, P = 0.03). Neither group had grade ≥ IV anastomotic leakage, and two cases of anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation were drained using the left diaphragmatic release technique. CONCLUSIONS: Transhiatal lower esophagectomy with gastrectomy using the open left diaphragm method is safe, highlighting its advantages for Siewert type II/III esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with an esophageal invasion length of ≤ 4 cm.

Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageals cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Proton-based, definitive chemoradiotherapy (P-CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously showed comparable survival outcomes with the surgery-based therapy, i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy (NAC-S), in a single-institutional study. This study aimed to validate this message in a Japanese multicenter study. METHODS: Eleven Japanese esophageal cancer specialty hospitals have participated. A total of 518 cases with clinical Stage I-IVA ESCC between 2010 and 2019, including 168 P-CRT and 350 NAC-S patients, were enrolled and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Propensity-score weighting analyses with overlap weighting for confounding adjustment were used. RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the P-CRT group was equivalent to the NAC-S group (74.8% vs. 72.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.25). Although, the 3-year P-CRT group progression-free survival (PFS) was inferior to the NAC-S group (51.4% vs. 59.6%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.85), the progression P-CRT group cases showed better survival than the NAC-S group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88), largely because of salvage surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection for local progression. The survival advantage of P-CRT over NAC-S was more pronounced in the cT1-2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.26) and cStage I-II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.07) subgroups, although this trend was not evident in other populations, such as cT3-4 and cStage III-IVA. CONCLUSIONS: Proton-based CRT for ESCC showed equivalent OS to surgery-based therapy. Especially for patients with cT1-2 and cStage I-II disease, proton-based CRT has the potential to serve as a first-line treatment.

Evaluation of the blood flow in reconstructed gastric tube and its relation to anastomosis leakage.

OBJECTIVES: Anastomotic leakage in esophageal cancer surgery may be reduced by evaluating the blood flow to the reconstructed organ, but quantitative evaluation of arterial and venous blood flow is difficult. This study aimed to quantitatively assess blood flow using a new technique, as well as determine the relationship between the blood flow in the gastric tube and anastomotic leakage using near-infrared spectroscopy. METHODS: This single-center, observational study included 50 patients aged 51-82 years who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer between June 2022 and January 2023. Regional tissue oxygen saturation was measured at the antrum (point X), the anastomotic point (point Z), and the midpoint between points X and Z (point Y) before and after gastric tube formation. These three points of oxygen saturation were investigated in relation to anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: When comparing the presence of leakage to its absence, regional tissue oxygen saturation at points X and Z after gastric tube formation was significantly lower (X: p = 0.03, Z: p = 0.02), with the decreasing rate significantly higher at point Z (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the decreasing rate of regional tissue oxygen saturation between points X and Y (X: p = 0.052, Y: p = 0.83). CONCLUSION: Regional tissue oxygen saturation levels may be useful for measuring blood flow and could be a predictor of anastomotic leakage.

Robot-Assisted-Minimally Invasive-Transhiatal Esophagectomy (RAMI-THE).

The authors review the development and steps of the robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. Key goals of the robot-assisted approach have been to address some of the concerns raised about the technical challenges with the traditional open transhiatal esophagectomy while keeping most of the steps consistent with the open approach.

Minimally Invasive Modified McKeown Esophagectomy.

McKeown esophagectomy is a transthoracic esophagectomy with a cervical anastomosis that is an established mainstay for the management of benign and malignant esophageal pathology. It has gone through multiple modifications. The most current version utilizes robotic or minimally invasive ports through both the right chest and abdominal portions. There is decreased pain and hospital length of stay compared to the open technique. However, anastomotic leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury continue to occur. Advancements in management of complications has decreased mortality, making this surgical approach a relevant option for esophageal pathologies.

Conduit Selection for Reconstruction After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

The reconstruction of the esophagus after esophagectomy presents many technical and management challenges to surgeons. An effective gastrointestinal conduit that replaces the resected esophagus must have adequate length to reach the upper thoracic space or the neck, have robust vascular perfusion, and provide sufficient function for an adequate swallowing mechanism. The stomach is currently the preferred conduit for esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy. However, there are circumstances, where the stomach cannot be utilized as a conduit. In these cases, an alternative conduit must be considered. The current alternative conduits include colon, jejunum, and tubed skin flaps.

Management of Major Complications After Esophagectomy.

Esophagectomy remains a procedure with one of the highest complication rates. Given the advances in medical and surgical management of patients and increased patient survival, the number of complications reported has increased. There are different grading systems for complications which vary based on severity or organ system, with the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group unifying them. Management involves conservative intervention and dietary modification to endoscopic interventions and surgical reintervention. Treatment is etiology specific but rehabilitation and patient optimization play a significant role in managing these complications by preventing them. Management is a step-up approach depending on the severity of symptoms.

Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

Robotic-assisted surgery is a safe and effective approach to minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Outcomes are optimized when surgeons are familiar with the fundamentals of minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and after gaining sufficient experience with robotic surgical techniques.

Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is a technically demanding operation that requires an experienced surgeon, assistant, and anesthesiologist. The preoperative workup should focus on the extent of disease and extent of resection required, as well as the cardiopulmonary fitness of the patient. Surgical outcomes show decreased postoperative pain, decreased morbidity largely due to a reduction in respiratory complications, and decreased length of stay. Quality metrics and 5-year overall survival are equivalent to traditional open esophagectomy.

Long-term survival outcomes of esophagectomy with off-pump CABG versus esophagectomy alone.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of esophagectomy with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) vs. esophagectomy alone. METHODS: A total of 1798 patients who received esophagectomy between January 2010 and February 2020 were included and divided into the 38 patients who underwent OPCABG followed by esophagectomy (OP + ES group) and 1760 patients had only esophagectomy (ES group). Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox multivariable analyses were performed to compare postoperative complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 37 patients in the OP + ES group matched with 74 in the ES group. The matched OP + ES group had higher total postoperative complications than the ES group, especially more pulmonary infections (P = 0.001) and arrhythmias (P = 0.018), but no other postoperative complications were the difference. The DFS was similar and the OS was a significant difference between the matching 2 groups (log-rank, P = 0.132 and 0.04, respectively). Although pT 3/4 stage, pN (+), and tumor length > 3.0 cm were independently associated with worse OS and DFS in multivariable analysis, CAD and EF < 55% were also found to be a predictive factor for OS and DFS in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: OPCABG followed by esophagectomy for esophageal cancer associated with coronary artery disease has equivalent DFS and recurrence pattern to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer alone, but with a disadvantage in OS.

Persistent pneumothorax after laparoscopic appendectomy in a patient who had undergone radical esophagectomy 5 years before: possible relationship with vulnerability of the hiatus after esophagectomy: a case report.

Postoperative pneumothorax is a well-known but relatively rare complication after laparoscopic surgery. Herein, we report a case of persistent pneumothorax after laparoscopic appendectomy. A 57-year-old male, with a history of minimally invasive esophagectomy and intrathoracic gastric tube reconstruction 5 years before, underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy. A chest X-ray taken on postoperative Day 1 revealed the development of the right pneumothorax, which took more than 3 days to resolve spontaneously. Although the mechanism of postoperative pneumothorax was unclear, it seemed likely that the air that had replaced carbon dioxide in the peritoneal cavity migrated into the thoracic cavity through the esophageal hiatus, which was not covered by the peritoneum or pleura after surgical resection. The present case, together with our previous similar case, suggests that a history of esophageal cancer surgery per se increases the risk of pneumothorax after laparoscopic surgery, probably regardless of when this was performed.

Laparoscopic versus open abdominal lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open abdominal lymph node dissection using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective analysis were 459 patients who underwent curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between May, 2005 and December, 2019, at our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: the Laparoscopic (Lap group) and the Open (Open group). Post-PSM, 139 patients from each group were selected for the analysis to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between the groups. RESULTS: The Lap group experienced fewer Clavien-Dindo (CD) Grade ≥ 2 complications (28.1% vs. 40.3%, P = 0.04) and lower rates of abdominal surgical site infections (SSI) (2.9% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.02) than the Open group. The number of lymph nodes harvested was similar in the Lap and Open groups (14.8 ± 7.5 vs. 15.7 ± 8.6, P = 0.34). There was no significant difference in 3-year overall survival rates (81.2% vs. 69.5%, P = 0.12) or relapse-free survival rates (61.1% vs. 58.2%, P = 0.54) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic abdominal lymph node dissection for ESCC can be performed safely and appears to be beneficial.

Does Thoracic Duct Ligation at the Time of Esophagectomy Impact Long-Term Survival? An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

Background: Thoracic duct ligation (TDL) during esophagectomy has been proposed to reduce the risk of postoperative chylothorax. Because of its role in immunoregulation, some authors argued that it had an unfavorable TDL effect on survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of TDL on overall survival (OS). Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2023. The primary outcome was 5-year OS. The restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. The GRADE methodology was used to summarize the certainty of the evidence. Results: Five studies (3291 patients) were included. TDL was reported in 54% patients. The patients' age ranged from 49 to 69, 76% were males, and BMI ranged from 18 to 26. At the 5-year follow-up, the combined effect from the multivariate meta-analysis is -3.5 months (95% CI -6.1, -0.8) indicating that patients undergoing TDL lived 3.5 months less compared to those without TDL. TDL was associated with a significantly higher hazard for mortality at 12 months (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38-1.73), 24 months (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.35), and 28 months (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28). TDL and noTDL seem comparable in terms of the postoperative risk for chylothorax (RR = 0.66; p = 0.35). Conclusions: In this study, concurrent TDL was associated with reduced 5-year OS after esophagectomy. This may suggest the need of a rigorous follow-up within the first two years of follow-up.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy with non-invasive ventilation by laryngeal mask-assisted anesthesia for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: case report.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer surgery remains associated with significant morbidity and surgical complications across the globe. Non-intubation video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS) has been successfully employed in lung resection in recent years, but there are few reported cases with regard to the safety and feasibility of this approach in radical esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancers. We present 4 consecutive cases with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received minimally invasive McKeown's esophagectomy under non-intubation general anesthesia from November 2022 to April 2023. All these patients were aged from 55 to 75 years old and were pathologically diagnosed with ESCC. All procedures of McKeown's esophagectomy in these patients were completed with non-invasive ventilation by laryngeal mask-assisted anesthesia. Operation duration ranged from 185 to 395 minutes and the estimated blood loss ranged from 25 to 60 ml in these 4 cases. No severe hypoxia was observed and transient hypercapnia was resolved intraoperatively. None of them was converted to endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation or to thoracotomy. The number of retrieved lymph nodes in mediastinum were 21-27 and all patients received R0 surgery with pathological stage as T1bN0M0 to T3N2M0. There was no serious complication (Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV) observed perioperatively and they were all discharged 11-14 days after the surgery with resumption of oral feeding. They are all alive without tumor recurrence at the date of data collection. The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive esophagectomy with non-invasive ventilation by laryngeal mask-assisted anesthesia for patients with ESCC are warranted for explored in a larger cohort study.

Management of neo-esophagus-airway fistula after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Neo-esophageal-airway fistula (NEAF) between gastric conduit and airway is a rare but life-threatening complication of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Optimal treatment remains unknown. A meta-analysis of good-quality case series may help determine whether nonoperative management (NOM) only, upfront surgery (S), or NOM followed by surgery (NOM+S) is associated with better one-year post-treatment mortality, resumption of oral diet and fistula recurrence. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for publications in English reporting case series of management and survival in patients with NEAF. Of the 177 identified studies, 62 were duplicates and 95 were not relevant to our topic. Three studies were excluded after a full-text review, due to absence of reporting of 1-year survival. Exclusion criteria to identified publications were: abstract only, malignant NEAF, absence of esophagectomy and esogastric anastomosis, fewer than five patients, and NEAF not the main focus of the study. Data-extraction was conducted in accordance with MOOSE guidelines. Data were pooled using random-effects model. RESULTS: 17 studies (302 patients) were included. One-year post-treatment mortality was considerably lower with NOM+S (33%; 95%CI, 0.17-0.48) than with NOM (68%; 95%CI, 0.39-0.97) or S (67%; 95%CI, 0.36-0.98). Fistula location was not associated with 1-year mortality. Neither resumption of an oral diet nor fistula recurrence differed significantly across treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: NOM to prepare patients for surgery followed by surgical repair may provide the highest 1-year survival of patients with NEAF. However, patient selection criteria to each of three treatment strategies may have affected our findings.

Use of Betaine HCl with Pepsin in Esophageal Cancer Patient: A Case Report.

The principal mechanisms surrounding gastrointestinal (GI) side effects due to chemotherapy are unclear, whereas the information regarding symptom management of patients with esophageal cancer post-esophagectomy is lacking. Esophagectomy patients are left with significant anatomical changes to the GI tract, including the cutting of the vagus nerve, which regulates gastric secretions, gastric acid pH, and motility. A 76-year-old male patient self-referred himself to the clinical dietitian for nutritional management of chronic nausea, fatigue, weight loss, and dumping syndrome 9 months post-esophagectomy, which was not responsive to medications. A physical functional nutritional assessment with evaluation of diet history and elimination suggested gastric hypochlorhydria. Gastric acid is needed for the active absorption of iron, zinc, B complex vitamins, especially B12, and digestion of consumed proteins. A digestive supplement, betaine hydrochloric acid with pepsin (BHClP), was introduced, and the patient ingested 1 capsule containing 500 mg betaine hydrochloride and 23.5 mg pepsin prior to protein-containing meals and reported a substantial decrease in GI symptoms while eating a regular diet with no limitations. He gained necessary weight and energy for daily activities. After a few months, the patient discontinued BHClP, and GI symptoms and dumping syndrome returned, leading to a loss of 7.5% of his body weight. The patient reinitiated the supplement and GI symptoms dissipated, and weight was restored. BHClP provided metabolic therapeutic benefit to optimize the patient's oral intake, preventing further complications and malnutrition. The success with BHClP for this patient case suggests that more research is needed to fully realize the mechanisms and clinical usage.

When Is Intensive Care Unit Admission Needed After an Esophagectomy?

INTRODUCTION: Due to the high morbidity associated with esophagectomies, patients are often directly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for postoperative monitoring. However, critical complications can arise after this initial ICU stay. We hypothesized that the timing of ICU stay was not optimal for the care of patients after esophagectomy and aimed to determine when patients are at risk for developing critical complications. METHODS: We searched the National Safety and Quality Improvement Program for patients who underwent an esophagectomy between 2016 and 2021. The outcome of interest was the interval between surgery and first critical complication. A critical complication was defined as one likely to require intensive care, including respiratory failure, septic shock, etc. Multivariate regression was performed to identify the risks of complications. RESULTS: This study included 6813 patients from more than 70 institutions. Within the first 30 d postesophagectomy, 21.59% of patients experienced at least one critical complication. Half of first critical complications occurred after postoperative day 5, and 85.05% of them occurred after postoperative day 2. Risk factors for critical complications included age greater than 60 y, preoperative comorbidities, and open surgical approach. Malignancies were associated with a significantly lower incidence of critical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Critical complications occurred beyond the immediate postesophagectomy period. Therefore, low-risk patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomies can be safely monitored outside the ICU, allowing for better patient care and resource utilization.