Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Heliyon ; 10(10): e31337, 2024 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38818177

RESUMEN

High failure rate is a primary characteristic of current farmer entrepreneurial activities in China. We examined the impact of entrepreneurial failure on the health of Chinese farmers based on the data from the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS). We found that entrepreneurial failure significantly depresses the health of Chinese farmers. Specifically, the farmers with entrepreneurial failure experience are more likely to have low self-reported levels of psychological and physical health, and the probability of experiencing severe injury and illness is elevated by 4.6 %. Mechanism analysis shows that entrepreneurial failure depresses the health of Chinese farmers through weakening informal social support and increasing the probability of overwork. Furthermore, these effects are more significant in the older generation of farmers who were born before 1980 and the farmers striving to make a living.

2.
Heliyon ; 9(4): e15249, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37095965

RESUMEN

Consumers' demand for high-degree food safety obliges the producers to respect health principles and enhance their product quality in the manufacturing process. Food safety refers to the conditions and practices that preserve food quality in order to prevent contamination and foodborne illnesses. This study aimed to investigate farmers' behavior toward on-farm food safety in Iran. So a survey study was conducted on the research population composed of commercial and exporter pistachio growers in Iran of whom 120 were selected. This paper reports the results of this exploratory study to conceptualize the measurement of pistachio growers' farm food safety using the theory of planned behavior. Structural equation modeling (partial least squares) was used to draw the research models and the relationships between latent variables and indicators. The findings revealed a statistically significant relationship between intention and self-efficacy. The intention is one of the most important variables in determining the planned behavior that has the greatest impact on behavior. Future research on this topic is recommended to use more variables that affect farmers' decision-making processes to form a strong opinion in predicting their behavior. It is crucial to consider some effective interventions such as providing large-scale training and community awareness programs for pistachio growers, particularly with the help of mass media, adopting suitable policy-making for on-farm food safety, and specifically supporting pistachio growers for the implementation of GAP-related practices.

3.
J Health Pollut ; 11(31): 210908, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34434600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Farming is an important occupation in Thai hill tribe communities, which are often remote, and lack other economic opportunities along with basic educational, health care, and occupational health and safety services. Additionally, these communities have a unique culture and language. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted in northern Thailand to evaluate pesticide exposures and associated health impacts among hill tribe farmers, and to compare them to Thai farmers. METHODS: Lahu hill tribe farmers in a mountain community were recruited by public health hospital staff, along with a reference group of lowland Thai farmers. Participants completed a survey on demographic factors and work practices, and blood and urine samples were collected by a trained nurse. Acetylcholinesterase activity (AChE) was quantified to assess pesticide exposure, whereas liver and kidney functions were evaluated using clinical biomarkers. RESULTS: A large fraction (nearly 50%) of Lahu farmers were illiterate and could not speak Thai. Thai farmers worked fewer hours per week (39.4) than did Lahu farmers. Among Lahu farmers, AChE levels were significantly lower (worse) than those of Thai farmers. However, other health outcomes in these populations were similar. Formal education and language skills were not associated with pesticide exposures or health outcomes. Pesticide spraying was found to be a significant predictor of reduced AChE (OR=8.5, 95% CI 1.1-69.6). CONCLUSIONS: Pesticide exposures are a significant occupational health hazard among Thai hill tribe farmers. Training, potentially delivered by community health volunteers, is needed to communicate safe pesticide work practices to these farmers. PARTICIPANT CONSENT: Obtained. ETHICS APPROVAL: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mae Fah Luang University (REH-61080). COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34444547

RESUMEN

Information on knowledge (K), attitude (A), and practice (P) in terms of pesticide use is essential for an effective exposure control program. The objectives of this study were to survey the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice in terms of pesticide use, and the prevalence of acute health symptoms (AHSs) among farmers in Nakhon Sawan Province, Thailand. The study also tried to identify factors affecting the practice of pesticide use. Data from 680 farmers were collected using a face-to-face interview questionnaire. The relationship between safety practices and related factors was analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. This study found about 40% of the farmers had a good level of practice. Factors affecting practice were education, work experience, level of knowledge, or attitudes. Many participants experienced acute health symptoms in the past 24 h, and these symptoms were significantly associated with poor practice (p < 0.05). Public health organizations should provide farmers with more information, especially on chronic effects of pesticides.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Plaguicidas , Agricultura , Estudios Transversales , Agricultores , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Tailandia
5.
F1000Res ; 10: 445, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35646323

RESUMEN

Background: Obesity is a serious condition because it is associated with other chronic diseases which affect the quality of life. In addition to problems associated with diet and exercise, recent research has found that pesticide exposure might be another important risk factor. The objective of this study was to determine the association between pesticide exposure and obesity among farmers in Nakhon Sawan and Phitsanulok province, Thailand.  Methods: This study was a population-based cross-sectional study. Data on pesticide use and obesity prevalence from 20,295 farmers aged 20 years and older were collected using an in-person interview questionnaire. The association was analysed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for its potential confounding factors.  Results: Obesity was found to be associated with pesticide use in the past. The risk of obesity was significantly predicted by types of pesticides, including insecticides (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.00-4.38), herbicides (OR = 4.56, 95% CI 1.11-18.62), fungicides (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.34-3.36), rodenticides (OR = 2.55, 95% CI 1.61-4.05), and molluscicides (OR = 3.40, 95% CI 2.15-5.40). Among 35 surveyed individual pesticides, 22 were significantly associated with higher obesity prevalence (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.10-2.88 to OR = 8.30, 95% CI 2.54-27.19), including herbicide butachlor, 15 insecticides (two carbamate insecticides, five organochlorine insecticides, and eight organophosphate insecticides), and six fungicides.  Conclusion: This study found obesity in farmers in Nakhon Sawan and Phitsanulok province, Thailand, to be associated with the long-term use of several types of pesticides. The issue should receive more public attention, and pesticide use should be strictly controlled.


Asunto(s)
Fungicidas Industriales , Insecticidas , Exposición Profesional , Plaguicidas , Estudios Transversales , Agricultores , Humanos , Insecticidas/análisis , Obesidad/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Plaguicidas/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Tailandia/epidemiología
6.
F1000Res ; 10: 474, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39228924

RESUMEN

Background: Pesticide exposure has been suspected as a cause of rhinitis, a common disease that affects the health and well-being of millions of people around the world. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the association between pesticide use and rhinitis prevalence among farmers in Phitsanulok province, Thailand. Methods: Data on historical pesticide use and rhinitis were collected by an in-person interview questionnaire. Data from 9,649 participants were included in the analysis. The association between pesticide exposure and rhinitis was determined by multiple variable logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounding factors. Results: The study found an association between pesticide exposure and the prevalence of rhinitis. The association was consistent across various types of pesticides (insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, and molluscicides) and individual pesticides. Some of the relationships were in a dose-response pattern. This finding was new as previous studies often reported the association of only a few specific pesticides. Conclusions: The results from this large cross-sectional study supports existing literature on the potential effects of pesticides on rhinitis. In addition, the analysis showed that the rhinitis effect might be in fact related to the properties of the types of pesticides rather than individual chemical toxicity. The impact of pesticides on rhinitis should receive more attention from public health and other organizations responsible for the farmers' health.


Asunto(s)
Agricultores , Exposición Profesional , Plaguicidas , Rinitis , Humanos , Tailandia/epidemiología , Plaguicidas/efectos adversos , Plaguicidas/toxicidad , Estudios Transversales , Rinitis/epidemiología , Rinitis/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano
7.
J Agromedicine ; 25(4): 357-361, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32921287

RESUMEN

Objectives: This paper seeks to: provide an overview of the impacts of and responses to the spread of COVID-19 in Ireland; assess the vulnerability of the population living in rural areas to COVID-19; compare the health status of male farmers to underlying medical conditions frequently associated with those experiencing the worst impacts of the illness; and assess the implications of COVID-19 for farmers living alone and farm households with children. Methods: We present an overview of the impact and response to COVID-19 through the use of public health statistics and reference to policy documents. We subsequently draw on the results of ongoing geographic and health research to present an overview of the impacts and potential implications of COVID-19. Results: The population of many rural areas and farmers in particular are highly vulnerable to adverse outcomes to COVID-19 infection. Single person farm households are at particular risk of isolation, whilst those families with children are at increased risk of stress. Conclusions: There is an urgent need to address both COVID-19 challenges and the health and wellbeing issues confronting farmers and farm families arising out of the current pandemic by supporting these populations adopt and sustain health behaviour changes, improve their wellbeing and develop the resources that support resilience.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Agricultores/psicología , Poblaciones Vulnerables/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Agricultores/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Pandemias , Salud Pública , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 813, 2020 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32471501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compared with the general population, Australian farmers-particularly men-have been identified as at greater risk of suicide. A complex range of factors are thought to contribute to this risk, including the experience of Stigma. stigma also impacts those who have attempted suicide, their carers, and those bereaved by suicide-manifesting as shame, guilt, social isolation, concealment of death, reduced help seeking and ongoing risk of suicide. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of an intervention, tailored for the farming context, designed to reduce stigma among farming men with a lived experience of suicide. METHODS: The digital intervention used an adult learning model providing opportunity to share insights, reflect, learn and apply new knowledge among people with shared farming interests, suicide experience and cultural context. A range of content-tailored to the gender, farming type and suicide experience of participants-included video stories, postcard messages, education and personal goal setting. Pre- and post- assessment of suicide stigma and literacy was complemented by qualitative data collection during the intervention and participant feedback surveys. RESULTS: The intervention was successful in reaching members of the target group from across Australia's rural communities-with diverse geographic locations and farming industries represented. One hundred and sixty-nine participants from the target group (farming males aged 30-64 years) were recruited. While the Stigma of Suicide Scale failed to identify a reduction in self- or perceived-stigma, qualitative data and participant feedback identified behavioural indicators of stigma reduction. Four subthemes-'growth', 'new realisations', 'hope' and 'encouragement'-highlighted attitudinal and behaviour change indicative of reduced stigma associated with mental health and suicide. Participants' baseline suicide literacy (Literacy of Suicide Scale) was high when compared with previous community samples and total literacy scores did not demonstrate significant improvement over time, although literacy about the link between suicide and alcoholism did significantly improve. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight opportunities in groups with high suicide literacy for targeted stigma reduction and suicide prevention efforts for both the target group and other populations within Australia and internationally. Results also highlight the need to reassess how stigma change is understood and evaluated across a wider range of population groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research project was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) (ACTRN12616000289415) on 7th March, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Agricultores/educación , Agricultores/psicología , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Estigma Social , Intento de Suicidio/prevención & control , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Adulto , Australia , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 17(1): 66-70, 2019 Apr 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31110379

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An increasing widespread use of Pesticides is as an issue in the agricultural sector. Pesticides use is one of the occupational risks in farmers of low-income countries including Nepal. Objective of this study was to explore the health effects of Pesticides among agricultural farmers of Sunsari. METHODS: A community based cross sectional study was carried out in Duhabi-Bhaluwa of Sunsari District, Nepal from September 2015 to February 2016. Non-probability sampling technique was used to enroll the total 300 study participants. Data were collected by face to face interview with farmers using pre-tested semi structured questionnaire. Data were recorded by reading the original container of the Pesticides. RESULTS: Fungicides (60.3%), Herbicides (56.3%), pyrethrum (35.3%) and Organophophate (11.6%) Pesticides were commonly used by the agricultural farmers in their farms. The health problem within 48 hours after application of pesticides was reported by more than one-sixth (17%) of the farmers. Dizziness (74.5%) and headache (58.8%) were the most common health problems found among the farmers. Skin irritation (19.6%), nausea (13.7%), paraesthesia (9.8%), restlessness (5.8%), eye irritation (5.8%) and vomiting (1.9%) were also reported by pesticides handlers. Factors associated with health problems were hazardous pesticides use (AOR=26.95, CI 6.15 - 118.0), good knowledge on impacts of pesticides (AOR=3.16, CI 1.09-9.13), determination of wind direction first and spray (AOR=2.25, CI 1.08-4.67), working experience of 20-29 years on farm (AOR=3.38, CI 1.05-10.83). CONCLUSIONS: One-sixth of the farmers reported health problems. Farmers working with hazardous Pesticides were in need of special attention in terms of safe handling, determing the wind direction and spray.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/inducido químicamente , Agricultores/estadística & datos numéricos , Plaguicidas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Fungicidas Industriales/efectos adversos , Herbicidas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nepal/epidemiología , Organofosfatos/efectos adversos , Piretrinas/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
10.
J Agromedicine ; 24(3): 228-238, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30849293

RESUMEN

Occupational illness, injury, and fatality rates for those working in production agriculture are higher than in any other industry. A potential risk factor contributing to occupational injuries across all industries is acute or chronic co-morbidity (e.g., obesity, high blood pressure, high cholesterol), and related health issues that increase the risk for an occupational injury or illness. These chronic health conditions have been associated not only with increased risk for injuries, but also higher health-care costs, and greater absenteeism. Certified Safe Farm (CSF) is a comprehensive intervention program aimed to reduce occupational health and safety hazards and to promote general health among farmers. Prior publications have described CSF program efforts to reduce hazardous exposures, disabling injuries, organic dust toxic syndrome, occupational health-care costs, and to increase positive occupational health behaviors. This paper reports on the general health indicators of a cohort of 438 Iowa farm owner/operators enrolled in the CSF program. Overall, this study found that the farming population in Iowa has higher body mass index (BMI), but lower total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and lower prevalence of hypertension compared to the general population. There was evidence that the combination of high blood pressure, cholesterol, and BMI were related to increased injury rates. Poor self-reported health status was also related to increased injuries but was not related to clinical health indicators. The CSF intervention led to improvements on health outcomes, particularly among those in the 35 to 49 age group. Little research has focused on the individual's general health status as a predictor of risk of occupational injury. This study suggests the need for additional research and interventions integrating occupational safety and health prevention along with health promotion.


Asunto(s)
Agricultores , Salud Laboral , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Colesterol/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Iowa , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
11.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 846, 2018 07 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29980237

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Australia, farming populations have been identified as having higher rates of suicide, in comparison to metropolitan, rural and regional communities. The reasons for this are unclear although stigma is considered a risk factor. This study was designed to understand the role of suicide stigma and suicide literacy and the relationship between these. METHODS: A mixed-methods online intervention was developed. This paper reports on baseline quantitative data (suicide stigma, suicide literacy and suicide effect) collected from male and female rural Australian participants (N = 536) with an experience of suicide. RESULTS: When compared with previous Australian community samples, our sample demonstrated higher levels of stigma and higher levels of suicide literacy. Males were more likely to have considered suicide than females. Females were more likely than males to report a devastating and ongoing effect of suicide bereavement, but less likely than a previous Australian community sample. CONCLUSION: Results of this study reiterate the need for improved understanding of the risk factors and experience of suicide within the context of life and work in rural Australian farming communities and how 'best practice' can be adapted to improve stigma reduction and suicide prevention efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research project was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ( ACTRN12616000289415 ) on 7th March, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Internet , Población Rural , Estigma Social , Suicidio/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
12.
One Health ; 5: 69-73, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29911168

RESUMEN

International and national organizations responsible for healthy food production and food consumers have too often neglected farmers, who are the producers in this cycle and are directly involved in environmental issues, integrating resources with their skills and producing agricultural crops to offer to civil society. Moreover, the health of farmers has also been neglected, when attending to their health would likely ensure a healthy environment and safe foods. Thus, the Farmer First Health Paradigm is seeking to address the fact that if international community expects a healthy environment and safe foods for future generations, then basic principles for producing healthy food in different countries should be considered and applied in their strategic plans. These principles are presented and discussed in this paper.

13.
BMC Public Health ; 16(1): 1204, 2016 11 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27899094

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Australian farming communities have up to twice the suicide rate of the general population. Men, particularly, demonstrate debilitating self- and perceived-stigma associated with an experience of suicide. The Ripple Effect is aimed to reduce suicide stigma within the social, cultural, geographical and psychological contexts in which it occurs. METHODS: A mixed-method design with multi-level evaluation will be effected following the development and delivery of a personalised website experience (combining shared stories, education, personal goal setting and links to resources) to farming men, aged 30-64 years, with an experience of suicide. Pre- and post-surveys will be used to assess changes in self- and perceived-stigma and suicide literacy. Online feedback from participants and semi-structured interviews during follow-up will be thematically analysed. DISCUSSION: This project will provide information about increasingly accessible, innovative approaches to reducing the debilitating health and wellbeing effects of suicide stigma on a population of Australia's farmers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research protocol was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) (ACTRN: ACTRN12616000289415 ) on 7th March, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Educación en Salud , Internet , Estigma Social , Suicidio/psicología , Adulto , Agricultura , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prevención del Suicidio
14.
Aust J Rural Health ; 23(4): 207-14, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25819226

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship between self-reported farm profitability and farmer well-being, and to explore potential implications for farmer assistance policy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of farmers from Regional Wellbeing Survey data (wave 1, 2013) and comparison between groups. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 1172 dryland farmers (35% women) and 707 irrigators (24% women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Personal Wellbeing Index and the Kessler 10-item measure of general psychological distress. RESULTS: There is a consistent and significant relationship between higher profitability, greater well-being and less distress among dryland farmers and irrigators. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between farm profitability and the well-being of Australian dryland farmers and irrigators has the potential to inform farmer assistance policy. Assistance programs can be more effective if they explicitly incorporate a profitability assessment into their targeting and eligibility requirements and a well-being component into program design and delivery. SETTING: Rural Australia. INTERVENTION: Not applicable.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura/economía , Agricultores/psicología , Satisfacción Personal , Asistencia Pública/normas , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Asistencia Pública/economía , Población Rural , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estrés Psicológico/economía , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
15.
Health Place ; 24: 97-109, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24071655

RESUMEN

Farmers have particular wellbeing-related vulnerabilities that conventional health interventions struggle to address. We consider the potential of natural resource management (NRM) programs, which reach large numbers of farmers, as non-conventional place-focused wellbeing interventions. Although designed to address environmental degradation, NRM can influence the wellbeing of farmers. We used qualitative meta-synthesis to reanalyse studies examining social dimensions of NRM in Australia and generate a theoretical framework identifying potential pathways between NRM and wellbeing, intended to inform subsequent empirical work. Our results suggest NRM programs influence several important determinants of farmer wellbeing, in particular social capital, self-efficacy, social identity, material wellbeing, and health itself. The pathways by which NRM influences these determinants are mediated by distal factors such as changes in land conditions, farmer skills and knowledge and resources accessible to farmers. These, in turn, are moderated by the design and delivery of NRM programs, suggesting potential to enhance the health benefits of NRM through specific attention to program design.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Promoción de la Salud , Satisfacción Personal , Australia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
16.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 8(10): 4039-54, 2011 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22073027

RESUMEN

This paper examines the role farmers' health plays as an element of adaptive capacity. The study examines which of twenty aspects of adaptation may be related to overall health outcomes, controlling for demographic and on-farm-factors in health problems. The analysis is based on 3,993 farmers' responses to a national survey of climate risk and adaptation. Hierarchical linear regression modelling was used examine the extent to which, in a multivariate analysis, the use of adaptive practices was predictively associated with self-assessed health, taking into account the farmer's rating of whether their health was a barrier to undertaking farm work. We present two models, one excluding pre-existing health (model 1) and one including pre-existing health (model 2). The first model accounted for 21% of the variance. In this model better health was most strongly predicted by an absence of on-farm risk, greater financial viability, greater debt pressures, younger age and a desire to continue farming. Social capital (trust and reciprocity) was moderately associated with health as was the intention to adopt more sustainable practices. The second model (including the farmers' health as a barrier to undertaking farm work) accounted for 43% of the variance. Better health outcomes were most strongly explained, in order of magnitude, by the absence of pre-existing health problems, greater access to social support, greater financial viability, greater debt pressures, a desire to continue farming and the condition of on-farm resources. Model 2 was a more parsimonious model (only nine predictors, compared with 15 in model 1), and explained twice as much variance in health outcomes. These results suggest that (i) pre-existing health problems are a very important factor to consider when designing adaptation programs and policies and (ii) these problems may mediate or modify the relationship between adaptation and health.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Agricultura , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Cambio Climático , Estado de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Rural , Apoyo Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA