Does the Nonunion Rate of Atypical Femoral Fractures Differ According to Fracture Site?: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: The nonunion rate for atypical femoral fractures (AFF) is known to be higher than that for typical fractures of the femur. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence of nonunion necessitating reoperation following fixation for AFF and compare the rates according to the fracture site (subtrochanter or midshaft). Methods: A total of 742 AFFs from 29 studies were included. A proportion meta-analysis utilizing a random-effects model was conducted to estimate the prevalence of nonunion. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis. To determine the association of nonunion with patient mean age or average duration of bisphosphonate use, meta-regression analysis was done. Results: In proportion meta-analysis, the estimated pooled prevalence of nonunion was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-10%) from all studies. There was a significant difference in nonunion rate between the 2 groups (I2 = 34.4%, p = 0.02); the estimated prevalence of nonunion was 15% (95% CI, 10%-20%) in subtrochanteric AFFs and 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%) in midshaft AFFs. From meta-regression analysis, significant correlations were identified between nonunion rate and patient mean age (coefficient: -0.0071, p = 0.010), but not in the average duration of bisphosphonate use (coefficient: -0.0024, p = 0.744). Conclusions: A notable disparity existed in the nonunion rate among subtrochanteric AFFs and midshaft AFFs group. Therefore, it is critical for orthopedic surgeons to consider the complexity and challenges associated with AFF and to estimate the proper possibility of nonunion according to the fracture site.

Incidence of complications and functional outcomes following segmental femoral shaft fractures: a critical review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Although segmental femoral shaft fractures (SFSF) are very challenging to manage, there has been no critical evaluation of the current practices and outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate their characteristics, management trends, outcomes, and complications. METHODS: A literature search was conducted via the SCOPUS, Embase (via SCOPUS) and MEDLINE (via PubMed) between 1995 and 2023. Studies were included if they reported patient demographics, mechanism of injury, classification of fractures, associated injuries, type of management, outcomes, and complications. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: only diaphyseal fractures were included and proximal and distal femoral fractures were excluded from this study. RESULTS: Overall, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting on 313 patients. Mean age was 36.2 years with male-female ratio of 4.8 to 1. The majority were high-energy fractures secondary to road traffic accidents and 16% were open. The most commonly associated injuries included chest injury (27%) and lower leg fractures (24%). Treatment consisted of intramedullary nailing (IMN) (72%), plating (22%) or both combined (6%). Outcomes reported: good in 70%, fair in 10%, excellent in 19% and poor in 2% of cases. Mean time to union was 20 weeks. Complications are reported in 24% of cases, with most common delayed union (5%) and non-union (4%). CONCLUSION: SFSF are high-energy fractures occurring most commonly in young males, are open in 16% of cases and have significant associated injuries. In their overwhelming majority, IMN is the mainstay of treatment. The expected outcome is generally good in 70% of cases, although not devoid of complications in 24% of cases and patients must be aware of this during the consent process.

Factors influencing the achievement of early surgery in proximal femoral fractures under a Japanese incentive policy.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures in geriatric patients are a major challenge in orthopedics, often leading to major functional impairment. Early surgical intervention is crucial for improving patient recovery and overall health outcomes. Thus, Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare initiated a reimbursement policy in April 2022 to encourage early surgery for these fractures in patients aged ≥75 years. This study investigated the impact of this policy on early surgery rates in Japan and identified factors influencing the timing of surgical interventions. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fractures at our institution between April 2022 and March 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the timing of surgery relative to the injury: ≤48 h and >48 h. Demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, fracture type, and various health- and admission-related factors, were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 192 patients, 152 were included in the study. Among them, 38% underwent early surgery (≤48 h), and 15% of the patients arrived more than 48 h post-injury. Significant differences were found in admission routes and residence types between the groups. The ≤48 h group had shorter intervals from injury to admission and surgery than the >48 h group. Factors such as the admission process, day of the week, and C-reactive protein levels significantly influenced the timing of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: After introducing incentives for early surgery in Japan, 38% of patients with proximal femoral fractures underwent surgery within 48 h of injury. Factors contributing to patients not receiving early surgery included transport from another hospital, weekend hospitalization, and elevated CRP levels. These findings suggest that achieving surgery within 48 h of injury is challenging through hospital efforts alone, and the time criteria might be more appropriate if changed to "admission to surgery."

Hip Axis Length and Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle as Risk Factors for Proximal Femur Fractures in Octogenarians to Centenarians.

(1) Background: The prevention of proximal femoral fractures among people of very advanced age is relevant as they are common and increasing in number. The aim of this study was to determine if the hip axis length (HAL) and the neck-shaft angle (caput-collum-diaphyseal CCD) are risk factors for those fractures among people aged 80 years and over. Consequently, it was additionally analysed if these parameters are associated with a certain fracture type. (2) Methods: Anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis were collected to form three groups (femoral neck fractures (FNFx), trochanteric fractures (TFx) and non-fractured femora (NFx)). Two independent blinded observers separately conducted each measurement of the HAL and CCD. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the association between the measured parameters and type of fracture. (3) Results: One hundred and fifty patients (50 per group) were examined, of which the mean age was 92.7 ± 3.5 (range 81-104) years. Both the HAL and CCD of the FNFx group were significantly larger than in the TFx group (p = 0.013, 0.003). The CCD was higher in the FNFx than that of the NFx group (p = 0.001). No further significant differences of HAL and CCD were observed between the groups. (4) Conclusions: For people aged 80 years and over, an increased HAL represented no risk factor for proximal femur fractures, and a large HAL was associated with an increased occurrence of FNFx instead of TFx. A large CCD was associated with an increased risk of suffering a femoral neck fracture, showing evidence of the CCD being a risk factor for the extremely old population.

Prevalence and risk factors for atypical femoral fracture among Lebanese patients with hip and shaft fractures.

This retrospective study investigates the prevalence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) among patients admitted with hip and shaft fractures at a tertiary referral center in Beirut, Lebanon. We analyzed electronic medical records and radiology studies of patients aged above 40 admitted with hip and shaft fractures between January 2006 and December 2019. Fractures were confirmed by ICD9 or ICD10 codes. All cases were reviewed by radiologists, and AFFs were identified according to the 2013 revised ASBMR criteria. We identified 1366 hip and shaft fracture patients, of which 14 female patients had 19 AFFs. This represents a prevalence of 1.0% among all hip and shaft fractures patients and 1.7% among all female hip and shaft fracture patients. Bilateral AFFs were found in 5 of the 14 patients. Patients with AFF tended to be younger, with a mean age of 74.3 (±8.6) yr compared to 78.0 (±10.6) for patients with non-AFF fractures. A total of 36% of AFF patients had a prior history of non-traumatic fracture at first admission. A high percentage of patients with AFFs reported intake of proton pump inhibitors (42.9%) and glucocorticoids (21.4%). Bisphosphonate exposure was noted in 64.3% of AFF patients. None of the AFF patients were active smokers or consumed alcohol regularly. BMD assessments were available for 7 AFF patients, indicating osteoporosis in 4 and osteopenia in 3 cases. Hip axis length measurements showed no significant difference between AFF patients (N = 7) and sex and age-matched controls (N = 21). The study underlines the prevalence and characteristics of AFFs in Lebanon, which is consistent with the numbers reported in the literature (0.32%-5%). A larger prospective study that includes hospitals across the nation is needed to gain a more comprehensive view of the prevalence of AFFs in the Lebanese population.

Atypical Metatarsal Fractures: Report of Five Clinical Cases.

Atypical fractures are well elucidated when they occur in the femur and are related to the use of bisphosphonates. Prolonged therapy with this drug leads to excessive suppression of bone remodeling, which makes the bone more brittle. In general, they are caused by minimal trauma or are atraumatic. This type of fracture is also reported in other bony sites, such as the metatarsus. Some reports and studies on atypical metatarsal fractures have been published, but further investigations are required to better understand this type of fracture and establish the proper diagnosis, treatment and conduct. The present study is a report of five cases of patients who presented metatarsal fractures during therapy with bisphosphonates. All patients were female, had osteoporosis as a preexisting disease, were taking bisphosphonates, presented fractures that were either atraumatic or caused by minimal trauma, and the imaging examination showed a transverse meta-diaphyseal fracture of the fifth metatarsal shaft with thickening of the lateral cortex, image characteristics similar to the criteria used by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASMBR) to define atypical femur fractures.

Comparative outcomes of uncemented and cemented stem revision in managing periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) following hip arthroplasty, especially Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures, present a challenge due to the association with a loose femoral stem, necessitating either open reduction and internal fixation or stem revision. This study aims to compare outcomes between uncemented and cemented stem revisions in managing Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures, considering factors such as hip-related complications, reoperations, and clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Danderyd Hospital, Sweden, from 2008 to 2022, encompassing operatively treated Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures. Patients were categorized into uncemented and cemented stem revision groups, with data collected on complications, revision surgeries, fracture healing times, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients were identified. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in patient demographics, with the cemented group comprising older patients and more females. Follow up ranged from 1 to 15 years. Average follow up time was 3.9 years for the cemented group and 5.5 years for the uncemented group. The cemented stems demonstrated lower rates of dislocation (8.9% versus 22.5%, P = 0.004) and stem loosening (0.6% versus 9.3%, P = 0.004) than the uncemented method. Moreover, the cemented group exhibited shorter fracture healing times (11.4 weeks versus 16.7 weeks, P = 0.034). There was no difference in clinical outcome between groups. Mortality was higher in the cemented group. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study indicates that cemented stem revision for Vancouver B2-3 fractures is correlated with lower dislocation and stem loosening rates, necessitating fewer reoperations and shorter fracture healing times compared with the uncemented approach. The cemented group had a notably higher mortality rate, urging caution in its clinical interpretation.

[Conservative fracture treatment in old people]. / Konservative Frakturversorgung bei alten Menschen.

The numbers of osteoporotic fractures will increase due to the demographic change, which particularly affects the proximal femur, pelvis, proximal humerus, wrist and vertebral column. Surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Non-dislocated fractures of the wrist can also be treated with a plaster cast but studies suggest that the results in the first 12 months are better after surgical treatment. The situation is similar for fractures of the proximal humerus and non-dislocated fractures in particular can also be treated conservatively. A score and classification were recently developed for making decisions on the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Fractures of the anterior and posterior pelvic ring can be treated conservatively with the patient under sufficient analgesia as long as there is no substantial dislocation. The highest priority in geriatric traumatology is fast remobilization.

HOOK ASSISTED REDUCTION IN CEPHALOMEDULLARY NAILING WITHOUT TRACTION TABLE.

Introduction: Proximal femoral nailing for intertrochanteric femur fracture is sometimes a challenging procedure without a traction table, especially if complicated fracture pattern. We aimed to overcome this difficulty with the hook. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 60 patients. 28 of the patients reduction was necessitated with a hook (group 1). The other patients did not need to use this technique (group 2, n=32). The collo-diaphyseal angle, lag screw placement, and tip-apex distance were measured using radiographs. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the Garden Alignment Index, postoperative collo-diaphyseal angle measurements, and tip-apex distance. The Garden Alignment Index was found as 163.92 degrees (dg.) In the frontal plane in group 1, and 154.78 dg in group 2, respectively. In group 1, the tip-apex distance was 16.05 cm, whereas it was 25.32 cm in group 2. The collo-diaphyseal angle was 133.1º in group 1, and 128.65º in group 2. Conclusions: The hook-assisted reduction is beneficial when operating without a traction table; however, it can also be a part of the surgeons' equipment even when operating on a traction table. When difficulties in obtaining an ideal anatomical reduction in displaced intertrochanteric femoral fractures, we suggest using the hook-assisted reduction technique. Level of Evidence III; Case-control Study.

Introdução: Frequentemente, a fixação do fêmur proximal para fratura intertrocantérica do fêmur sem uma mesa de tração é um procedimento desafiador, especialmente se o padrão da fratura for complicado. O objetivo foi superar essa dificuldade utilizando um gancho. Materiais e métodos: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo de 60 pacientes. Em 28 desses, a redução foi necessária com um gancho (grupo 1). Os outros pacientes não precisaram usar essa técnica (grupo 2, n=32). O ângulo colo-diafisário, a colocação do parafuso lag e a distância ponta-ápice foram medidos por meio de radiografias. Resultados: Houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os dois grupos com relação ao Índice de Alinhamento de Garden, às medidas do ângulo colo-diafisário pós--operatório e à distância ponta-ápice. O índice de alinhamento de Garden foi de 163,92 graus (dg.) No plano frontal no grupo 1 e 154,78 dg no grupo 2, respectivamente. No grupo 1, a distância ponta-ápice foi de 16,05 cm, enquanto no grupo 2 foi de 25,32 cm. O ângulo colo-diafisário foi de 133,1 graus no grupo 1 e 128,65 graus no grupo 2. Conclusão: A redução assistida por gancho é benéfica quando se opera sem uma mesa de tração; no entanto, ela também pode fazer parte do equipamento do cirurgião mesmo quando se opera em uma mesa de tração. Quando houver dificuldades em obter uma redução anatômica ideal em fraturas femorais intertrocantéricas deslocadas, sugerimos o uso da técnica de redução assistida por gancho. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo de Caso-controle.

LOW INFECTION AND NON-UNION RATES IN POLYTRAUMA FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.

Objective: Assess complications and risks in staged femoral shaft fracture treatment using external fixation and intramedullary nailing (DCO). Methods: Analysis involved 37 patients with 40 fractures, mostly male (87.5%), average age 32.9 years. Data included ASA score, AO/OTA and Gustilo classifications, Glasgow Coma Score, Injury Severity Score, times to external fixation and conversion, ICU duration, nail type, and reaming status. Complications tracked were mortality, deep infection, and non-union. Results: Predominant fracture type was AO/OTA A (45%), with 40% open (Gustilo A, 93.8%). Average ISS was 21; GCS was 12.7. Median ICU stay was 3 days; average time to conversion was 10.2 days. Retrograde nails were used in 50% of cases, with reaming in 67.5%. Complications included deep infections in 5% and non-union in 2.5%. Conclusion: DCO strategy resulted in low infection and non-union rates, associated with lower GCS and longer ICU stays. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objetivo: Analisar taxa de complicações e riscos no tratamento estagiado de fraturas diafisárias do fêmur com fixador externo e conversão para haste intramedular (DCO). Métodos: Estudo com 37 pacientes, 35 masculinos, idade média de 32,9 anos, abordando escores ASA, classificação AO/OTA, Gustilo, Glasgow e ISS, tempo até a fixação externa, na UTI e tipo de haste. Complicações como mortalidade, infecção profunda e não união foram registradas. Resultados: Fraturas tipo AO/OTA A foram as mais comuns (45%), com 40% expostas (Gustilo A, 93,8%). ISS médio de 21 e ECG de 12,7. Média de 3 dias na UTI e 10,2 dias até a conversão. Uso de haste retrógrada em 50% dos casos e fresagem em 67,5%. As complicações incluíram infecção profunda em 5% e não união em 2,5%. A não união correlacionou-se com baixo ECG e tempo prolongado na UTI. Conclusão: A estratégia de DCO mostrou-se eficaz com baixas taxas de infecção e não união, associada a baixo ECG e tempo na UTI. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo de Coorte Retrospectivo.

Proximal femoral fractures in patients with COVID-19 : Pneumonia and admission from a nursing home are the strongest predictors of mortality.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures are severe injuries in geriatric patients. Additionally, geriatric patients are at a high risk of death due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of mortality in geriatric patients with COVID-19 and concurrent proximal femoral fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical treatment for proximal femoral fractures and also tested positive for COVID-19 were included. The age, gender, the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score and the admission from a nursing home were considered as variables. The rate of reoperations, the mortality at 3 months and discharge home were evaluated as outcomes. RESULTS: In this study 46 patients with COVID-19 (female/male 31/15, median age 87.0 years with an interquartile range [IQR] of 9.8 years) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 32 patients (69.6%) had to be cared for in the intensive care unit and 26 patients (56.5%) had a severe course of COVID-19 with pneumonia. The median length of hospital stay for survivors was 19 (IQR 17.5) days and 4 of the patients (8.7%) required surgical revision. The in-hospital and 3­month mortality were 40.0% (n = 17) and 43.5% (n = 20), respectively. The factors which influenced the in-hospital and 3­month mortality rates were admission from a nursing home, the presence of pneumonia (increased the risk of death) and female gender (protective). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of COVID-19 in patients with proximal femoral fractures has a high mortality. Admission from a nursing home and the presence of pneumonia increased the risk of death, whereas women were at lower risk.

Enhancing Osteoporosis Management: A Thorough Examination of Surgical Techniques and Their Effects on Patient Outcomes.

Managing osteoporotic fractures in older individuals is a difficult task in orthopedic surgery. It requires a careful approach that combines advanced diagnostic methods, customized surgical treatments, and comprehensive rehabilitation strategies. This article presents the results of an analysis carried out at the University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest. The analysis specifically examines the treatment of osteoporotic fractures using different osteosynthesis techniques. Although diagnostic tools like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) have improved, a considerable number of fractures still happen in people who do not have obvious osteoporosis. This emphasizes the importance of using additional diagnostic measures such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to improve the accuracy of predictions. The study demonstrates the intricate nature of surgical decision-making and the significance of adjusting techniques to meet the specific needs of each patient. An instance of osteosynthesis failure resulting from the inappropriate choice of method highlighted the crucial significance of a thorough preoperative assessment. The discussion highlights the importance of early mobilization and rehabilitation in reducing the risks associated with prolonged immobilization and improving patient recovery. This paper strongly supports the use of evidence-based and patient-centered methods in the management of osteoporotic fractures. It emphasizes the importance of utilizing the most recent advancements in diagnostic and surgical technologies. Promising advancements in orthopedic medicine lie in the future, particularly in the integration of interdisciplinary research and personalized medicine. These advancements have the potential to enhance patient outcomes in this population that is at high risk.

Standard or Fin SIGN® nail? which option is better for the treatment of femoral fractures in low and middle-income countries?

PURPOSE: Femoral fractures are common in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), predominantly caused by high-energy trauma. The surgical implant generation network (SIGN®) program offers two different intramedullary nails in LMIC which are designed to be used without image intensifier free of charge for the patients: the SIGN standard nail (SSN®) and the SIGN Fin nail (SFN®). This study aimed to compare the results of the SSN® and the SFN® for the treatment of middle and distal shaft femoral fractures through a retrograde approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive, and non-experimental study including all consecutive patients who underwent surgical management of middle or distal shaft femoral fracture between January 2017 and May 2022 in an NGO hospital located in Freetown, Sierra Leone. The duration of surgery, type of reduction, complications like screw loosening, implant migration, anterior knee pain and non-union rate at six months of follow up were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included in the study. Group A: 60 patients were managed with SSN® and Group B: 62 patients with SFN®. The mean operative time was 104 min with SSN® and 78 with SFN® (p < 0.001). Open reduction of the fracture was necessary in ten (16.7%) patients with SSN® and 12 (19.4%) patients treated with SFN® (p = 0.69). Non-union was observed in one (1.7%) patient with SSN® and two (3.2%) patients with SFN® (p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Both options seem equally effective in treating midshaft and distal femoral shaft fractures. The SFN® reduces the surgical time, due to this fact, in polytraumatized patients, patients with bilateral femur fracture or patients with ipsilateral tibia fracture, it can be considered as the best option to be used. There was no statistical difference in the complications presented by the two groups.

Association between Central Nervous System Drugs and Femoral Fracture Risk in Japanese Individuals ≥80 Years Old: A Case-crossover Study.

Objectives To assess the association between concomitant use of central nervous system drugs and femoral fracture risk in individuals ≥80 years old in Japan. Methods A case-crossover design was used, defining the case period as 3 days before the fracture diagnosis and the control period as 31-33, 34-36, and 37-39 days prior. The association between the daily intake of central nervous system drugs (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes) and fracture risk was analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Patients Using the Japanese administrative claims database, we examined elderly patients diagnosed with femoral neck fractures between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020. Results In 255,875 patients, the concomitant use of central nervous system drugs increased the odds ratios of femoral fracture (3.41[95% confidence interval: 3.27-3.55], 3.69 [3.46-3.91], 3.76 [3.42-4.13], and 4.34 [3.86-4.86] for an intake of >0-1, >1-2, >2-3, and >3 central nervous system drugs, respectively). Conclusions The concomitant use of central nervous system drugs is associated with an increased risk of femoral fractures in individuals ≥80 years old in Japan.

The use of intramedullary reduction techniques in the treatment of irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fractures with negative medial cortical support.

Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of intramedullary reduction techniques for irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fractures with negative medial cortical support. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 69 patients with irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fractures with negative medial cortical support treated in the Department of Orthopedics at Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University) from July 2019 to December 2021. Patients were divided into Group A and Group B. Group A (experimental group) consisted of 36 cases with an average age of 76.2 ± 5.9 years, while Group B (control group) comprised 33 cases with an average age of 76.6 ± 6.3 years. Group A received treatment using intramedullary reduction techniques, while Group B received treatment using traditional extramedullary reduction techniques. Both groups achieved anatomic reduction of the medial cortex or slight positive support. Surgical duration, intraoperative fracture reduction time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, postoperative neck-shaft angle loss, femoral neck shortening, and hip joint functional recovery score (FRS) were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients were followed up for an average of 13.8 months. Group A showed superior outcomes compared to Group B in surgical duration, intraoperative fracture reduction time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, postoperative neck-shaft angle loss, and femoral neck shortening (P < 0.05). Hip joint function assessed by functional recovery score was better in Group A than Group B at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), with no significant statistical difference at other time points (P > 0.05). Conclusion: For irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fractures with negative medial cortical support, intramedullary reduction techniques used during surgery demonstrated simplicity, significant reduction in surgical duration, decreased intraoperative bleeding, fewer amounts of intraoperative fluoroscopy, improved fracture reduction quality, and reduced surgical complexity. Further clinical research and application are warranted.

Development of Fear of Falling after proximal femoral fracture.

Background: Proximal femoral fracture is common in older people. Beyond a long recovery process and significant permanent functional limitations, older people often experience subsequent Fear of Falling. The phenomenon of Fear of Falling is not fully understood; qualitative research is underrepresented but can provide insights into the experience of those affected. Objectives: We aimed to explore the experiences of Fear of Falling development and to what extent it affects peoples' life after proximal femoral fracture. Methods: We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with nine older people, aged between 61 and 88, who participated in a prospective observational study. Interview data were analysed through inductive content analysis. Results: Six major themes emerged: The development of Fear of Falling; the effect of FoF and hope for recovery; alternating between moments of fear and security; fear of helplessness and of losing independence; strategies for dealing with Fear of Falling and maintaining independence; need of support by health care professionals. Conclusion: To identify and support older people in coping with Fear of Falling (after proximal femoral fracture), strategies for dealing with Fear of Falling across occupational groups and all healthcare settings should be implemented. Nurses have a key role in this process.

Long stem revision versus short stem revision with plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture: a comparative study of eighty five cases.

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFs) around the hip are challenging complications in orthopaedic surgery, particularly Vancouver type B2 (VTB2) fractures. The surgical management of these fractures is crucial and depends on various factors. Cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis is an alternative surgical technique. This study aims to compare the outcomes of this surgical technique with revision arthroplasty (RA) with long stem in the treatment of VTB2 PPFs. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a single medical institute from February 2010 to May 2019. Patients who had received either total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty and subsequently developed a VTB2 PPF were included; patients who sustained intra-operative fractures or received a cemented stem previously were excluded from the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups: group I received RA with cementless long stem, while group II underwent RA with cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis. Demographic data, radiographic and functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients diagnosed with VTB2 PPFs were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data, including age, gender, mean follow-up times, estimated blood loss, and operative times. The radiographic results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of subsidence and implant stability between the two groups. However, group II tended to have less subsidence and periprosthetic osteolysis. Patients in group II had significantly better functional scores (mean Harris hip score: post-operative: 60.2 in group I and 66.7 in group ii; last follow-up: 77.4 in group 1 and 83.2 in group II (both p < 0.05)). There were no significant differences in the overall complication rate, including infection, dislocation, re-fracture, and revision surgery, between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques, cementless long stem and cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis, are effective in the treatment of Vancouver B2 PPFs, with no significant differences in outcomes or complications. However, patients in cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis had better functional scores at both post-operative and the last follow-up.

Unravelling variations: an examination of entry point selection in proximal femoral cephalomedullary nailing.

BACKGROUND: The exact positioning of the cephalomedullary (CM) nail entry point for managing femoral fractures remains debatable, with significant implications for fracture reduction and postoperative complications. This study aimed to explore the variability in the selection of the entry point among trauma surgeons, hypothesizing potential differences and their association with surgeon experience. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, 16 participants, ranging from residents to senior specialists, partook in a simulation wherein they determined the optimal entry point for the implantation of a proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A; DePuy Synthes) in various femora. The inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated, along with comprehensive descriptive statistical analysis, to assess the variability in entry point selection and the impact of surgeon experience. RESULTS: In this study, the mean distance from the selected entry points to the calculated mean entry point was 3.98 mm, with a smaller distance observed among surgeons with more than 500 implantations (ANOVA, p = 0.050). Intra-surgeon variability for identical femora averaged at 5.14 mm, showing no significant differences across various levels of surgical experience or training. Notably, 13.6% of selected entry points would not allow a proper intramedullary positioning of the implant, thereby rendering anatomical repositioning unfeasible. Among these impossible entry points, a significant skew towards anterior placement was observed (70.6% of the impossible entry points), with a smaller fraction being overly lateral (27.5%) or medial (13.7%). On a patient level, the impossibility rate varied widely from 0 to 35% among the different femora examined, with a significantly higher rate seen in younger patients (mean age 55.02 versus 60.32; t-test for independent samples, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations exist in surgeons' selection of entry points for proximal femoral nailing, underscoring the task's complexity. Experience does not prevent the choice of unfeasible entry points, emphasizing the inadequacy of a universal approach and pointing towards the necessity for a patient-specific strategy for improved outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00032465.

Intraoperative Fracture during the Insertion of Advanced Locking Screws (T2 Alpha Femur Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing System): Report of Two Cases and Identifying Causes and Prevention.

Background: Recently, the T2 alpha nailing system (Stryker, Inc.), which has advanced locking screws that can attach a screw to a rod, has been used worldwide and is expected to improve fracture fixation. We analyzed two cases of supracondylar femoral fractures in older adult patients, in which intraoperative fractures occurred during the insertion of advanced locking screws of the T2 alpha femur retrograde intramedullary nail. Case presentation: A 93-year-old and an 82-year-old woman each underwent T2 alpha femur retrograde nail fixation for supracondylar femur fractures at separate hospitals, and advanced locking screws were used as the proximal transverse locking screws. In both patients, a fracture line was observed at the proximal screw postoperatively, and the fractures were refixed with distal cable wiring and/or femoral distal plates. The patients were subsequently discharged from the same facility with no remarkable pain. Conclusions: When inserting advanced locking screws, it is necessary to enlarge the screw hole in the near-bone cortex with a counterbore drill, which might add torque to the bone cortex that could result in fractures. If the sleeve is distant from the bone, the counterbore drill will not reach the bone, the screw hole will not expand, and the insertion of advanced locking screws will apply a strong torque to the bone cortex and may result in fracture. Moreover, it is important to confirm that the counterbore drill is securely inserted under fluoroscopy and to carefully enlarge the bony foramen manually to prevent fractures during screw insertion.