Developing a National Study That Integrates the Geriatric Assessment into the Care of Older Patients with Myeloid Malignancies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the priorities in geriatric assessment research in myeloid malignancies and discuss design considerations necessary to ensure research is patient-centric, generalizeable, and high quality. RECENT FINDINGS: Older adults with myeloid malignancies including those who are perceived to have excellent performance status have multiple functional impairments. These impairments are associated with early mortality. Older adults have different functional trajectories through the course of treatment; this will be further investigated in our ongoing multicenter study. In a single-center study, we have demonstrated the use of geriatric assessment to guide treatment is feasible. Key priorities include designing a multicenter validation study to confirm the role of geriatric assessment in determining treatment tolerance and survival. Such a study should include core geriatric assessment measures and should enroll diverse patient population across various practices. Conducting such a study is necessary to advance patient care and trial design, and to open venues to conduct studies to confirm the role of geriatric assessment in treatment selection.

Determining the minimum data set of geriatric assessment at the Iran primary health care referral system: shifting from fragmentation to integration care for older people.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multidimensional process that disrupts the primary health care (PHC) referral system. Accessing consistent data is central to the provision of integrated geriatric care across multiple healthcare settings. However, due to poor-quality data and documentation of GA, developing an agreed minimum data set (MDS) is required. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a GA-MDS in the PHC referral system to improve data quality, data exchange, and continuum of care to address the multifaceted necessities of older people. METHODS: In our study, the items to be included within GA-MDS were determined in a three-stepwise process. First, an exploratory literature search was done to determine the related items. Then, we used a two-round Delphi survey to obtain an agreement view on items to be contained within GA-MDS. Finally, the validity of the GA-MDS content was evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty specialists from different health geriatric care disciplines scored data items. After, the Delphi phase from the 230 selected items, 35 items were removed by calculating the content validity index (CVI), content validity ratio (CVR), and other statistical measures. Finally, GA-MDS was prepared with 195 items and four sections including administrative data, clinical, physiological, and psychological assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The development of GA-MDS can serve as a platform to inform the geriatric referral system, standardize the GA process, and streamline their referral to specialized levels of care. We hope GA-MDS supports clinicians, researchers, and policymakers by providing aggregated data to inform medical practice and enhance patient-centered outcomes.

A multicomponent personalized prevention program in the primary care setting: a randomized clinical trial in older people with noncommunicable chronic diseases (Primacare_P3 study).

BACKGROUND: Multicomponent interventions based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) could promote active aging and improve health status in older people with Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases (NCDs), but conflicting evidences are available. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of a CGA-based multicomponent personalized preventive program (PPP) in reducing unplanned hospitalization rates during 12-month follow-up in community-dwelling older people with NCDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial (RCT), 1216 older adults recruited by 33 general practitioners (GPs) will be randomly allocated to intervention group (IG) or usual care control group (CG). The IG will receive a multicomponent PPP developed on the findings of the CGA-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index short-form (Brief-MPI), including structured interventions to improve functional, physical, cognitive, and nutritional status, to monitor NCDs and vaccinations, and to prevent social isolation. Participants in the CG will receive usual care. Brief-MPI, resilience, and health-related quality of life will be assessed after 6 and 12 months. Moreover, saliva samples will be collected at baseline in IG to measure biomarkers of oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and oral microbiome. EXPECTED RESULTS: The CGA-based PPP might reduce unplanned hospitalization rates and potentially institutionalization rates, emergency department (ED) and unplanned GP visits, and mortality. Further outcomes explored in the IG will be the adherence to PPP, resilience, health-related quality of life, and multidimensional frailty as assessed by the Brief-MPI. CONCLUSIONS: Results will suggest whether the CGA-based multicomponent PPP is able to improve specific outcomes in a primary care setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT06224556 ; Registered January 25, 2024.

Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Sustaining independence is important for older people, but there is insufficient guidance about which community health and care services to implement. Objectives: To synthesise evidence of the effectiveness of community services to sustain independence for older people grouped according to their intervention components, and to examine if frailty moderates the effect. Review design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eligibility criteria: Studies: Randomised controlled trials or cluster-randomised controlled trials. Participants: Older people (mean age 65+) living at home. Interventions: community-based complex interventions for sustaining independence. Comparators: usual care, placebo or another complex intervention. Main outcomes: Living at home, instrumental activities of daily living, personal activities of daily living, care-home placement and service/economic outcomes at 1 year. Data sources: We searched MEDLINE (1946-), Embase (1947-), CINAHL (1972-), PsycINFO (1806-), CENTRAL and trial registries from inception to August 2021, without restrictions, and scanned reference lists. Review methods: Interventions were coded, summarised and grouped. Study populations were classified by frailty. A random-effects network meta-analysis was used. We assessed trial-result risk of bias (Cochrane RoB 2), network meta-analysis inconsistency and certainty of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation for network meta-analysis). Results: We included 129 studies (74,946 participants). Nineteen intervention components, including 'multifactorial-action' (multidomain assessment and management/individualised care planning), were identified in 63 combinations. The following results were of low certainty unless otherwise stated. For living at home, compared to no intervention/placebo, evidence favoured: multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.59; moderate certainty) multifactorial-action with medication-review (odds ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 10.60) cognitive training, medication-review, nutrition and exercise (odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 4.77) and activities of daily living training, nutrition and exercise (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 4.76). Four intervention combinations may reduce living at home. For instrumental activities of daily living, evidence favoured multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (standardised mean difference 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.21; moderate certainty). Two interventions may reduce instrumental activities of daily living. For personal activities of daily living, evidence favoured exercise, multifactorial-action and review with medication-review and self-management (standardised mean difference 0.16, 95% confidence interval -0.51 to 0.82). For homecare recipients, evidence favoured the addition of multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (standardised mean difference 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.88). Care-home placement and service/economic findings were inconclusive. Limitations: High risk of bias in most results and imprecise estimates meant that most evidence was low or very low certainty. Few studies contributed to each comparison, impeding evaluation of inconsistency and frailty. Studies were diverse; findings may not apply to all contexts. Conclusions: Findings for the many intervention combinations evaluated were largely small and uncertain. However, the combinations most likely to sustain independence include multifactorial-action, medication-review and ongoing review of patients. Some combinations may reduce independence. Future work: Further research is required to explore mechanisms of action and interaction with context. Different methods for evidence synthesis may illuminate further. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019162195. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128862) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 48. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Due to a lack of robust evidence, the benefits and risks of most types of community services for older people are unclear. Individualised care planning, where medication is adjusted and there are regular follow-ups, probably helps people stay living at home. There are many kinds of community services for older people. For example, in some services, everyone is given exercise and dietary advice or an individualised care plan. These often aim to help older people age independently. Maintaining independence is important in later life. We wanted to find out which community services work best: to help people stay living at home, and to do day-to-day activities independently. We reviewed findings from previous studies that have tested different community services for older people. We combined these findings and compared different types of service with one another. We rated our confidence in the evidence. We found 129 studies with 74,946 people. We found 63 different kinds of service have been studied. The studies were carried out in diverse populations around the world. Individualised care planning, where medication is adjusted and there are regular follow-ups, may help people age independently. It probably increases the chance of staying at home slightly. It may also help with doing day-to-day activities very slightly. Exercise and dietary advice may also help people stay living at home. However, there was some evidence that some services may reduce independence. We do not know what effect most services have. We generally had little confidence in the evidence because studies were small, and information was missing. The evidence is up to date to August 2021.

Short-term mortality and associated factors among older hospitalized patients: A narrative retrospective analysis of end-of-life care in an acute geriatric unit.

OBJECTIVES: To explore short-term mortality and its predictors among older patients hospitalized in a acute geriatric ward (AGW) in Northwestern Italy. DESIGN: Retrospective observational single-center cohort study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients consecutively admitted for any reason between June 2021 and May 2022 were included in the analysis. Along with sociodemographic, clinical, and functional variables, prognosis estimation (Palliative Prognostic Index; PPI) at the time of admission was registered. Short-term all-cause mortality (in-hospital and within 3 months of discharge) was the primary outcome. RESULTS: About one-third of the total sample died in the short-term (32.4 %). Along with PPI score (OR 1.115, 95 %CI 1.034-1.202), short-term mortality was independently associated with functional dependency (OR 1.278, 95 %CI 1.170-1.395). CONCLUSIONS: The high short-term mortality in our sample should call for the inclusion of palliative prognostic tools within the in-hospital comprehensive geriatric assessment to better recognize and appropriately manage older patients at the end of life.

Fellows as teachers: enhancing geriatrics fellows' teaching skills through direct observation and feedback.

Fellowship is a prime opportunity for sub-specialists to hone their teaching skills, however many fellowships lack formal teaching curricula. Existing curricula may not include supervision of fellows' teaching skills. We designed a Fellows as Teachers curriculum for geriatric medicine fellows that incorporates direct observation and feedback to improve their teaching skills. Based on a needs assessment, we implemented the program in the academic year 2021-2022 where fellows were observed in their teaching of third-year medical students. Fellows first participated in a Train the Trainer session, then were observed teaching a geriatrics skills session to medical students after which they received feedback from faculty and students. Fellows completed a survey rating the program's effectiveness in improving their teaching skills. Twenty fellows completed the needs assessment; the majority felt uncomfortable teaching a geriatrics assessment. Eighteen fellows taught at least one skills session; 36% found the program to be extremely helpful, 38% very helpful, and 28% somewhat helpful in improving their teaching skills. We successfully designed and implemented a Fellows as Teachers program consisting of a Train the Trainer session and formal observation with feedback for our geriatric medicine fellows. All fellows felt the curriculum was helpful in improving their teaching skills.

Reliability and validity of the German version of the University of Jyvaskyla Active Aging Scale (UJACAS-G).

BACKGROUND: The University of Jyvaskyla Active Aging Scale (UJACAS) assesses active aging through willingness, ability, opportunity, and frequency of involvement in activities. Recognizing the lack of a German version, the Finnish original was translated (UJACAS-G). This study aimed: (1) to evaluate the test-retest reliability of UJACAS-G; and (2) to explore correlations with health-related parameters (concurrent validity). METHODS: The study (test-retest design) targeted healthy older adults aged 65+. Reliability of UJACAS-G (total and subscores) was assessed using Bland-Altman analyses and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). Furthermore, correlations (Spearman's rho) between UJACAS-G scores and physical function (walking speed, handgrip strength, balance, 6-minute walk distance), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), life-space mobility (Life-Space Assessment), and health-related quality of life (Short Form-36 Health Survey) were calculated. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analyses (N = 60; mean age 72.3, SD 5.9 years; 50% women) revealed mean differences close to zero and narrow limits of agreement for all scores (total score: mean difference -1.9; limits -31.7 to 27.9). The ability subscore showed clustering at its upper limit. ICC was 0.829 (95% CI 0.730 to 0.894) for the total score and ranged between 0.530 and 0.876 for subscores (all p-values < 0.001). The total score correlated with walking speed (rho = 0.345; p = 0.008), physical activity (rho = 0.279; p = 0.033) and mental health (rho = 0.329; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: UJACAS-G is reliable for assessing active aging among German-speaking healthy older adults. A potential 'ceiling effect' regarding the ability subscore should be considered when applying UJACAS-G to well-functioning populations. Analyses of concurrent validity indicated only weak correlations with health-related parameters.

C-reactive protein/albumin ratio as a novel predictor for nutritional status of geriatric patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel parameter that has been reported as a significant prognostic marker in some diseases. The purpose of the present research was to investigate the predictive value of this ratio with regard to nutritional status in geriatric patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 154 geriatric patients (age ≥65 years) who consecutively presented to the internal medicine outpatient clinic were included in this cross-sectional study. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) was used as a reference to determine the nutritional status of the patients. Based on the MNA results, the patients were divided into two groups: normal nutrition and malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. The median CAR of malnourished patients or those at risk of malnutrition was significantly higher than that of patients with normal nutritional status (p = .012). A significant negative correlation was also observed between the MNA score and the CAR (r = -0.196, p = .015). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the CAR was a significant predictor of malnourishment or the risk of malnutrition (p = .012). CONCLUSION: The CAR could predict which geriatric patients were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. CAR may be used as a new tool in the nutritional screening of geriatric patients.

[Preventive care for geriatric patients in general medicine]. / Prävention bei geriatrischen Patientinnen und Patienten in der Allgemeinmedizin.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing functional deficits early and counteracting them with a multimodal treatment concept is one of the most important tasks of general practitioners, who are usually the primary medical contact for geriatric patients. AIM: Illustration of strategies for a biopsychosocial assessment of geriatric patients and for the creation of individually adapted prevention concepts in general practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature research on the theoretical background of the most important prevention approaches for geriatric patients as well as considerations on their relevance and implementation in daily practice. RESULTS: For geriatric patients prevention measures should be implemented simultaneously on all four prevention levels. The main objective is promoting physical and mental exercise. The risks of immobility, depression, cognitive decline, malnutrition and, last but not least, polypharmacy are of particular importance. CONCLUSION: Geriatric patients represent a very heterogeneous group. In order to be able to take individual preventive action, a multidimensional assessment of key factors for maintaining functionality and relative health is required, even though chronic conditions may already exist.

Prognostic accuracy of eight frailty instruments for all-cause mortality in Australian primary care.

AIM: To investigate the ability of eight frailty instruments to accurately predict all-cause mortality and other adverse outcomes in Australian primary care patients. METHODS: Study participants included adults aged ≥75 years attending one of three primary care clinics in South Australia. Frailty instruments studied were Fried's frailty phenotype (FFP), the Frailty Index (FI) of cumulative deficits, Kihon Checklist (KCL), the Fatigue Resistance Ambulation Illness and Loss of weight (FRAIL) scale, Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), PRISMA-7, Reported Edmonton Frail Scale (REFS), and gait speed. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 12- and 24-months. Secondary outcomes included falls, general practice attendance, hospital admission and emergency department (ED) presentation at 12-months. RESULTS: 243 participants (55.6 % female) with a mean (SD) age of 80.2 (4.6) years were included. 29 participants (16.6 %) were classified as frail at baseline by FFP. All frailty instruments demonstrated a significant ability to predict 12- and 24-month mortality. The REFS showed the highest auROC for both 12- and 24-month mortality. The REFS, Frailty Index, Kihon Checklist, FRAIL scale, and gait speed showed excellent discriminative ability for 12-month mortality (auROC ≥ 0.8 - >0.9), while the remainder showed acceptable discrimination. All frailty instruments, with the exception of the GFI, showed an excellent discriminative ability for 24-month mortality (auROC 0.8-<0.9). CONCLUSIONS: All frailty instruments possessed adequate discriminative ability for all-cause mortality predicting in older primary care patients. Frailty measurement is thus a valuable strategy to identify older patients at risk of mortality and can guide clinical decision-making in primary care settings.

Adequate assessment yields appropriate care-the role of geriatric assessment and management in older adults with cancer: a position paper from the ESMO/SIOG Cancer in the Elderly Working Group.

With the aging population, older adults constitute a growing proportion of the new cancer cases. Given the heterogeneous health status among older adults and their susceptibility to aging-related vulnerabilities, understanding their diversity and its implications becomes increasingly crucial for prognostication and guiding diagnostics, treatment decisions, and follow-up, as well as informing supportive care interventions. Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) refers to the comprehensive evaluation of an older individual's health status with subsequent management plans focusing on both oncologic and non-oncologic interventions. In 2019, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) established the ESMO/SIOG Cancer in the Elderly Working Group. This position paper reflects the recommendations of the working group. Our paper summarizes the existing evidence with a focus on recent key trials and based on this, we propose several recommendations and future directions.

Mapping the way: functional modelling for community-based integrated care for older people.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare system sustainability is challenged by several critical issues; one of the most pressing is the ageing population. Traditional, episodic care delivery models are not designed for older people who are medically complex and frail. These individuals would benefit from health and social care that is more comprehensive, coordinated, person-centred and accessible in the communities in which they live. Delivering this is a challenging endeavour. Community-based health and social care professionals are siloed, dispersed across various locations and sectors, each with their own mental models, electronic health information systems, and means of communication. To move away from fragmented care delivery models and towards a more integrated approach to care, an analysis of the process of community-based comprehensive geriatric assessment was conducted in an urban location in Atlantic Canada. The purpose of the study was to identify where in the community-based comprehensive geriatric assessment process challenges and opportunities existed for moving towards a more integrated model of care delivery. METHOD: The functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) and dynamic FRAM (DynaFRAM) modelling were used to model the community-based health and social care system and create a hypothetical patient journey scenario. Data collected to inform modelling consisted of document review, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews with health and social care professionals providing care and service to older people in the community setting. FINDINGS: Challenges and opportunities for implementing integrated care in the local context were identified. Findings from the FRAM and DynaFRAM analysis informed the co-design of multi-level process improvement recommendations that aim to move the local community-based comprehensive geriatric assessment process towards a more integrated model of care. CONCLUSIONS: A transformative redesign of community-based health and social care in the local context is necessary but cannot be accomplished without an understanding of how health and social care professionals conduct their work and how older people may receive care under the dynamic conditions. The FRAM and DynaFRAM modelling provided an enhanced understanding of system operations and functionality and demonstrated a critical step that should not be overlooked for decision-makers in their efforts to implement a more integrated model of care.

Impact of Frailty on Post-Treatment Dysphagia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

In the rising and frail head and neck cancer (HNC) population, geriatric assessments are crucial. Frail HNC patients often experience dysphagia. The coexistence of dysphagia and frailty presents complex health challenges, however, there is limited evidence on the prognostic value of frailty on post-treatment dysphagia. This study explores the relationship between pre-treatment frailty status and post-treatment dysphagia in HNC patients. A retrospective data analysis from the OncoLifeS data-biobank at the University Medical Center Groningen of 242 patients diagnosed with HNC between 2014 and 2016. The study involved several physical, functional and psychological pre-treatment geriatric assessments, and frailty screening using the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and the Geriatric-8 screening tool (G8). Outcome measures were swallowing-related quality of life (HNSW-QoL) and toxicity-related dysphagia evaluations (CTCAE-D) at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Linear mixed-effects models assessed factors associated with HNSW-QoL and CTCAE-D. Frail patients consistently reported worse HNSW-QoL and CTCAE-D than non-frail patients over time, with symptoms increasing at 3 months, but gradually decreasing by 24 months. Frailty status (G8 or GFI) was a significant predictor for lower HNSW-QoL (ß = 11.770 and 10.936, both p < 0.001), and lower CTCAE-D (ß = 0.245, p = 0.058; ß = 0.331, p = 0.019), respectively. In this study, frailty was found to be associated with a worse of swallowing-related quality of life, and with increased toxicity-related dysphagia. These findings provide insights for the identification of HNC patients at higher risk of post-treatment swallowing-related issues, and offer opportunities for optimizing their post-treatment swallowing outcomes.

The Impact of Hearing Impairment on Patient Care and Autonomy.

Sensory deficits, including hypoacusis, can cause a barrier to communication between healthcare providers and patients, which in turn can lead to misdiagnosis and loss of patient autonomy. Such deficits are frequently overlooked in clinical encounters. We present a 92-year-old Spanish-speaking female who presented twice to the Emergency Department for complications of a diabetic foot infection. Limited evaluation, documentation, and accommodations regarding the patient's hypoacusis led to a misinterpretation of her mental status and a transfer of decision-making to surrogates. A two-toe amputation, mechanical intubation, and intensive care unit stay were followed. It was only after these events that the caregivers realized the patient's hypoacusis and learned about her different wishes focused on pain control and hospice care rather than surgical intervention. Available geriatric tools, a consultation with a geriatrician, a thorough evaluation of sensory deficits, and a multidimensional and comprehensive approach could have prevented the loss of autonomy and unexpected care.

Development and Validation of Physical Disability Index and Mental Disability Index and Their Associations With Falls Among Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: To enhance the precision of measuring, analyzing, and forecasting care needs for older adults with physical and/or mental disabilities, we developed the Physical Disability Index (PDI) and Mental Disability Index (MDI). Furthermore, we evaluated the reliability and validity of the PDI and MDI. Additionally, we investigate their associations with falls to further indicate the predictive validity. METHODS: A total of 11 621 older adults (53.1% women; mean age = 83.2; SD = 10.8) from 23 provinces in China were investigated in 2017-2018 to assess the reliability and validity of the PDI and MDI among older adults aged 65 to 105. Among which, 6 071 older adults with both baseline (2017-2018) and follow-up (2021) data were included in analyses to evaluate associations between the baseline health status determined by PDI and MDI and the number and severity of falls at baseline and follow-up. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine internal consistency. The convergent and divergent validity, known-group validity and concurrent validity were assessed. Multinomial logistic regression models were utilized to assess associations. RESULTS: We found satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.70) of the PDI and MDI in the total sample and sex-specific subgroups. Our results support the convergent and divergent validity, known-group validity, and concurrent validity of the PDI and MDI. We also found baseline physical disability and comorbid physical and mental disability are associated with a higher risk of baseline and follow-up falls. CONCLUSIONS: The PDI and MDI are reliable and valid instruments to assess physical and mental disability status among older adults, respectively.

Validation of the delirium diagnostic tool-provisional (DDT-Pro) in geriatric medical inpatients with diagnostic permutations of the 3Ds with and without delirium.

OBJECTIVE: Validations of brief delirium tools have not included analysis of psychiatric disorders comorbidities or control groups. We validated the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional (DDT-Pro) in 422 geriatric inpatients with high incidence of depression and/or dementia. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using two delirium reference standards, DSM-5-TR and Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98). We assessed concurrent and construct DDT-Pro validity too. RESULTS: There were 117 (27.7%) delirium cases using DDT-Pro, 104 (24.6%) per DSM-5-TR and 93 (22.0%) per DRS-R98; 133 patients (31.5%) had depression and 105 (24.9%) dementia, some comorbid with delirium. DDT-Pro accuracy (AUC under ROC curve) ranges were 88.3-95.9% vs DSM-5-TR and 92.7-95.0% vs DRS-R98 for whole sample and four diagnostic groups, without statistical differences. DDT-Pro ≤6 had the most balanced sensitivity-specificity for delirium diagnosis against both DSM-5-TR and DRS-R98 with similar specificity but higher sensitivity for DRS-R98 than DSM-5-TR delirium, with the highest values in patients with depression and dementia (≥92% sensitivity, ≥81% specificity). Positive and negative likelihood ratios support diagnostic strength. Concurrent validity was high reflected by significant correlations (p < 0.001) of DDT-Pro total and item scores with DRS-R98 and Delirium Frontal Index scores, highest in groups with comorbid depression and/or dementia. The DDT-Pro represented a single construct for delirium demonstrated by one factor with high item loadings and high internal consistency reliability of its items. CONCLUSIONS: The DDT-Pro demonstrated strong performance metrics in general hospital elderly inpatients with preexisting depression and/or dementia, which is unique among brief delirium tools. Its optimized cutoff score was the same as in other populations.

Lung Cancer: New Directions in Senior Patients Assessment.

Age is but one significant prognostic factor in lung cancer, influencing survival, treatment response, and outcomes. This narrative review synthesizes findings from searches of 11 leading databases of research studies, systematic reviews, book chapters, and clinical trial reports on lung cancer in senior patients, with a focus on geriatric assessment as well as biomarkers. Key prognostic factors for lung cancer in seniors include biological age, functional capability, physical and psychological comorbidities, frailty, nutrition, status, and biomarkers like DNA methylation age. We identified the most valuable assessments that balance efficacy with quality of life. Optimizing care and improving outcomes with senior lung cancer patients benefits from a tailored therapeutic approach incorporating a complex geriatric assessment. A multidisciplinary collaboration between geriatricians, oncologists, and pulmonologists is crucial.

[Care models for older people based on a case study-Geriatrics as an active discipline]. / Versorgungsmodelle für ältere Menschen an einem Fallbeispiel ­ Geriatrie als aktiv handelndes Fach.

Geriatrics can enable and monitor a holistic care of older people through a comprehensive geriatric assessment in a structured way. Therefore, it must be integrated much more closely with preventive, rehabilitative and acute care units. Geriatrics are not seen in any aspects as a replacement for general practitioners or in-hospital structures but much more as a supplement to them. With its function-oriented concept, geriatrics can best coordinate the demographically necessary triage between prevention, acute treatment, rehabilitation and palliative care, thus avoiding undertreatment and overtreatment. This can only succeed in collaboration with general practitioners and specialist colleagues. The article categorizes geriatric care structures, such as preventive home visits, acute complex medical treatment, delirium prevention, outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation services based on a case example and makes proposals for structural changes that urgently need to be considered in the current healthcare reform, such as outpatient geriatric centers (AGZ).