Dizziness and impaired walking balance in aging patients during chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults are at risk of adverse effects during chemotherapy including nausea and fatigue, but many also suffer from dizziness and peripheral neuropathy. This may lead to balance and walking impairments and increased risk of falls and affect health-related quality of life. Moreover, these symptoms are often underreported with inadequate awareness among health professionals leading to deficient focus on the need for targeted assessment and rehabilitation. We aimed to examine the prevalence of dizziness, impaired walking balance, and neuropathy and falls in older adults ≥65 years with gastrointestinal cancer receiving chemotherapy and the associations between these symptoms. Further, we aimed to examine the quantity of patients reporting these symptoms to the oncologist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study among patients ≥65 years with gastrointestinal cancers who have completed three or more series of chemotherapy. The prevalence of dizziness, impaired walking balance, neuropathy, and reporting of these adverse effects was examined through structured questionnaires. RESULTS: Of two hundred patients (57 % male, mean age 74.4 years) the prevalence of dizziness was 54 % and the prevalence of patients experiencing impaired walking balance was 48 %. Symptoms of neuropathy was present in 32 % of patients and 11 % experienced falls during chemotherapy. Symptoms of neuropathy was associated with experiencing dizziness: odds ratio (OR) 1.98 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.06; 3.71) and impaired balance: OR 3.61 (95 % CI: 1.87; 6.96). Less than half the patients (48 %) told the oncologist about these symptoms. DISCUSSION: Dizziness and impaired walking balance during chemotherapy are underreported yet profound symptoms among older patients with cancer. Dizziness and impaired balance should be systematically assessed during chemotherapy among older patients.

In-hospital outcomes of older patients with gastric cancer and their risk factors: large comprehensive institution-based study.

PURPOSE: Gastric cancer (GC) is mostly a disease of aging, and older patients with GC are generally frailer. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and in-hospital outcomes, both overall and stratified by gender and resection, and to explore factors associated with outcomes of first hospitalization, in older GC patients. METHODS: Data on GC patients ≥ 65 years hospitalized from January 2016 until December 2020 were retrieved from the electronic medical records of a large tertiary hospital. Patient and tumor characteristics, duration and fee of hospitalization, and in-hospital mortality were described for overall patients and compared by gender and resection. Factors associated with outcomes of first hospitalization were explored using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: 3238 eligible patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 71 years and a male proportion of 74%. The median duration and fee of first hospitalization were 13 days and 40,000 RMB, respectively, with a median fee of 17,000 RMB not covered by insurance. 16 (< 1%) and 32 (1%) deaths occurred during first and any hospitalization, respectively, with only 4 (< 1%) perioperative deaths. Compared to male patients, female cases had more often signet-ring-cell carcinoma, reduced food intake, resection, and history of major abdominal surgery. Compared to unresected cases, resected patients had higher body-mass-index and Barthel index, less often reduced food intake, weight loss, and risk of malnutrition, and more often common diet, longer hospital stay, and higher fee. Through multivariable-adjusted analysis, longer first hospital-stay was associated with earlier year of diagnosis, older ages, emergency admission, signet-ring-cell carcinoma, resection, history of anticoagulant intake, larger body-mass-index, non-common diet, and non-low-salt and non-diabetes diets; higher fee of first hospitalization was associated with later year of diagnosis, male gender, older ages, emergency admission, signet-ring-cell carcinoma, and resection. CONCLUSIONS: In this large institution-based study, older GC patients had low in-hospital mortality rates; the insurance coverage needs to be improved. Several characteristics and in-hospital outcomes significantly differed by gender and resection status, and various factors associated with duration and fee of first hospitalization were identified, providing important hints for individualized and stratified geriatric GC care.

Associations of quality of social support and accurate beliefs about curability among older adults with advanced cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Supporting older adults with advanced cancer to better understand their disease and its prognosis is important for shared decision-making. Social support is a potentially modifiable factor that may influence disease understanding. In this study, we examined the associations of quantity and quality of social support with patients' beliefs about the curability of their advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial that recruited older adults aged ≥70 with advanced incurable cancer. At enrollment, patients completed the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) Medical Social Support form that measures both quantity (number of close friends and relatives) and quality of social support. Quality of social support was measured using 12 questions in instrumental and emotional support, each ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher cumulative scores indicated greater quality of support. For beliefs about curability, patients were asked, "What do you believe are the chances that your cancer will go away and never come back with treatment?" Responses were 0 %, <50 %, 50/50, >50 %, and 100 %. Ordinal logistic regression was used to investigate the association of quantity and quality of social support with beliefs about curability, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: We included 347 patients; mean age was 76.4 years and 91 % were white. Quantity of social support was not associated with belief in curability [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.03, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (0.92, 1.16)]. For every unit increase in the quality of social support (OARS Medical Social Support score), the odds of believing in curability decreased by 26.7 % [AOR 0.73, 95 % CI (0.56, 0.97)]. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated that the quality, but not the quantity, of social support was associated with patients' beliefs about curability. These findings suggest that bolstering social support may directly enhance disease understanding. This insight informs supportive care interventions that specifically address disease comprehension among patients.

Trends in the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factors for older patients with cancer, 2010 to 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive treatment are at an increased risk for developing febrile neutropenia (FN) or having chemotherapy dose-reductions or delays, resulting in suboptimal health outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) are effective medications to reduce these adverse events and are recommended for patients ≥65 years receiving chemotherapy with >10 % FN risk. We sought to characterize the trends and predictors of G-CSF use between the youngest-old (66-74 years), middle-old (75-84 years), and oldest-old (≥85 years) patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used registry data from SEER-Medicare for breast, lung, ovarian, colorectal, esophageal, gastric, uterine, prostate, pancreatic cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) diagnoses from 2010 to 2019. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used. RESULTS: Overall, 41.4 % of patients received G-CSF from chemotherapy initiation to three days after completion of the first chemotherapy course. The use rate remained relatively stable for all cancers, except for an increase in use for those with pancreatic cancer. G-CSF use decreased as patients got older. The oldest-old were 43.0 % (95 % confidence interval: 40.7-45.2 %) less likely to receive G-CSF compared to the youngest-old. Patients with breast cancer or NHL were more likely to receive G-CSF than those with other cancers. Patients who were female, married, White or Hispanic, and had fewer comorbidities were more likely to receive G-CSF. DISCUSSION: G-CSF is used less often in populations at higher risk of developing FN and related complications. Improving adherence to recommendations can improve health outcomes, especially in the oldest adults, older males, and Black patients.

"Faith and a sunny day": Association of patient frailty with strain experienced by informal caregivers of older adults with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated the potential effects of aging-related conditions like frailty in older adults with cancer on informal caregivers. Our objective was to evaluate the association between the sum total of the aging-related conditions of older adults with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and the strain reported by their informal caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed methods cross-sectional survey study that recruited 81 dyads of older adults with NMIBC (age ≥ 65 at diagnosis) and their informal caregivers. Our outcome was measured by the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI), a self-reported measure of informal caregivers. Our exposure was the patient's deficit accumulation index (DAI), a validated composite measure of frailty derived from a geriatric assessment. A multivariable negative binomial regression was conducted to model CSI. We conducted qualitative thematic content analysis of responses to open-ended survey questions to understand specific types of caregiver strain and to identify coping strategies. RESULTS: Mean ages of patients and caregivers were 79.4 years and 72.5 years, respectively. Most caregivers were spouses (75.3 %) and lived with the patient (80.2 %). Of patients, 54.3 % were robust, 29.6 % were pre-frail, and 16.1 % were frail. In the multivariable model, we found that patient DAI was significantly associated with CSI (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.05, 95 % CI 1.02-1.09). The top three sources of strain identified by caregivers were emotional adjustments, medical management, and family adjustments. Coping strategies for each included self-management of emotions, self-education about bladder cancer, and social support, respectively. DISCUSSION: In this cross-sectional study, we found that worsening frailty in an older adult with NMIBC was associated with greater informal caregiver strain. Informal caregivers reported challenges with emotional management, family dynamics, and medical tasks. These findings may inform longitudinal research and interventions to support informal caregivers who provide care for older adults with NMIBC.

Trends in racial and ethnic disparities in health-related quality of life in older adults with lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to quantitatively examine differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) by race/ethnicity among older adults with lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) data set, we identified two cohorts of patients ≥65 years old with lung cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 who completed the health outcomes survey within 36 months pre- and post-diagnosis. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) were used to measure HRQOL. Racial/ethnic groups were White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) linear regression analyses with pairwise contrasts assessed disparities among the racial/ethnic groups. MVA models were adjusted for sex, age, marital status, education, income, year diagnosed, comorbidity count, limitations in activities of daily living, national region, histology, and treatment type (post-diagnosis cohort only). RESULTS: We identified 4025 patients in the pre-diagnosis cohort (White = 75.9 %, Asian = 6.3 %, Black = 8.7 %, and Hispanic = 6.1 %; stages I = 28.8 %, II = 8.9 %, III = 21.7 %, IV = 27.8 %, unknown = 12.7 %) and 2465 patients in the post-diagnosis cohort (White = 74.4 %, Asian = 7.8 %, Black = 8.8 %, and Hispanic = 5.8 %; stages I = 40.2 %, II = 14.1 %, III = 17.5 %, IV = 10.7 %, unknown = 17.5 %; treatment type surgery = 0.9 %, radiation = 46.5 %, radiation and surgery = 26.8 %, no radiation or surgery = 25.9 %). Upon pre-diagnosis cohort UVA, White and Asian patients had higher mean MCS scores than Black and Hispanic patients (51.3 and 52.7 vs 47.4 and 47.4, respectively; p < .001 and p < .001), White patients had higher mean PCS scores than Black patients (38.6 vs 36.0; p < .001), and Asian patients had higher mean PCS scores than White, Black, and Hispanic patients (40.7 vs 38.6, 36.0 and 37.5, respectively; p = .008, p < .001, and p = .005). On pre-diagnosis MVA, White and Asian patients had higher mean MCS scores than Hispanic patients (51.2 and 52.0, respectively, vs 47.2; p < .001). On pre-diagnosis MVA, Asian patients had higher mean PCS scores than White patients (52.0 and 51.2; p = .002).On post-diagnosis UVA, White and Asian patients had higher mean MCS scores than Black patients (48.9 and 48.9, respectively, vs 46.3; p = .006 and p = .042), White patients had higher mean MCS scores than Hispanic patients (48.9 vs 46.1; p = .015), White patients had higher mean PCS scores than Black patients (33.8 vs 31.9; p = .018), and Hispanic patients had higher mean PCS scores than Black patients (34.9 vs. 31.9; p = .019). On post-diagnosis MVA, race/ethnicity was no longer associated with differing MCS or PCS. DISCUSSION: Among older patients with lung cancer, those identifying as White or Asian had higher pre-diagnosis mental HRQOL than Hispanic patients. However, HRQOL differences before diagnosis among all racial/ethnic groups were no longer significant after cancer diagnosis and treatment. Understanding these patterns of HRQOL can be used for more pointed initiatives to improve therapeutic strategy, compliance, goals of care, and treatment-related morbidity.

Current approaches to the pharmacological management of metastatic breast cancer in older women.

INTRODUCTION: A substantial majority of patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer consists of individuals 65-year-old or above. Emerging treatment approaches, which utilize genomics-guided therapy and innovative biomarkers, are currently in development. Given the numerous choices in the metastatic context, it is necessary to adopt a personalized approach to decision-making for these patients. AREAS COVERED: The authors provide a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on the use of systemic anticancer treatments in older women, specifically those aged 65 and above, who have metastatic breast cancer, focusing on the reported effectiveness and adverse effects of these treatments in this population. EXPERT OPINION: The evidence to treat older patients with metastatic breast cancer primarily relies on subgroup analyses, whose interpretation should be approached with caution. In several clinical trials subgroup analysis, it has been observed that this population seem to have comparable benefits and toxicities to younger patients, but real-world data have showed older women exhibit worse rates of survival compared to younger women. Multiple factors are likely involved in this, but we postulate this is related to lower rates of guideline concordant, and factors such as comorbidity, lack of social supports, malnutrition, and geriatric factors like frailty and/or vulnerability. This underscores the importance of a broader assessment for patients with a geriatric perspective and involvement of multi-disciplinary team.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Treatment Decisions, and Outcomes in Older Patients Eligible for Pancreatic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Periampullary cancer has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is a potentially curative but high-risk treatment. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can inform treatment decisions, but has not yet been evaluated in older patients eligible for pancreatic surgery. METHODS: This prospective observational study included patients ≥ 70 years of age eligible for pancreatic surgery. Frailty was defined as impairment in at least two of five domains: somatic, psychological, functional, nutritional, and social. Outcomes included postoperative complications, functional decline, and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 88 patients included, 87 had a complete CGA. Sixty-five patients (75%) were frail and 22 (25%) were non-frail. Frail patients were more likely to receive nonsurgical treatment (43.1% vs. 9.1% p = 0.004). Fifty-seven patients underwent surgery, of which 52 (59%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The incidence of postoperative delirium was three times higher in frail patients (29.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.005). The risk of mortality was three times higher in frail patients (HR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.43-7.89, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Frailty is common in older patients eligible for pancreatic surgery and is associated with treatment decision, a higher incidence of delirium and a three times higher risk of all-cause mortality. CGA can contribute to shared decision-making and optimize perioperative care in older patients.

Association between frailty and overall survival among older adults with hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults undergoing cancer treatment often experience more treatment-related toxicities and increased risk of mortality compared to younger patients. The role of frailty among older individuals as a predictor of outcomes has gained growing significance. We evaluated the association between frailty and overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≥60 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Older adults ≥60 years with HCC enrolled in a prospective single-institution registry underwent a patient-reported geriatric assessment (GA) covering multiple health domains related to prior to their initial medical oncology appointment. Frailty was measured using a 44-item deficit accumulation frailty index. We categorized patients as robust, pre-frail, and frail using standard cutpoints. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Univariable and multivariable models were built to evaluate the association between frailty and OS after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Total of 116 older adults with HCC with a median age of 67 years were enrolled; 82% male, 27% Black, and 78% with stage III/IV disease. Overall, 19 (16.3%) were robust, 39 (33.6%) pre-frail, and 58 (50.1%) frail. There were 76 patients receiving liver directed therapy. Of these, 13 (17%) were robust, 26 (34%) were pre-frail, and 37 (49%) were frail. Over a median follow up of 0.9 years, 53 patients died. After adjusting for age, stage, etiology, and Child-Pugh class, being frail (vs. robust) was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.6 [95% CI 1.03-6.56]; p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: Half of the participants in this study were frail, which was independently associated with worse survival in adults ≥60 years of age with HCC. Identification of pre-treatment frailty may allow opportunities to guide treatment decisions and prognostication.

Identification of older adults with Alzheimer's and related dementias among patients newly diagnosed with cancer: A comparison of methodological approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Research efforts to characterize and evaluate care delivery and outcomes for older adults with cancer and comorbid dementia are limited by varied methods used to classify Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in demographic, clinical, and cancer characteristics of people newly diagnosed with cancer and concomitant dementia comparing two common methods to identify ADRD using administrative claims data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data. Our sample included adults aged 66 years and older with a first primary diagnosis of lung or colorectal cancer between 2011 and 2017. For each cancer diagnosis, we constructed analytical cohorts using the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Chronic Condition Warehouse (CCW) flag and the Bynum-Standard one- and three-year algorithms to capture diagnosed ADRD. We estimated ADRD prevalence using the algorithms and compared Bynum and CCW cohorts on demographic, clinical, and cancer characteristics at cancer diagnosis and survival for lung and colorectal cancer separately. RESULTS: Among older adults with lung cancer, ADRD prevalence was 4.7% with the one-year Bynum, 6.5% with the three-year Bynum, and 12.5% using the CCW flag. In the colorectal cohort, ADRD prevalence was 5.6% with the one-year Bynum, 7.6% with the three-year Bynum, and 14.1% with the CCW flag. Demographic characteristics were similar across ADRD cohorts. The Bynum cohorts identified higher proportions of individuals with moderate to severe dementia (13.8% and 11.2% versus 7.1% CCW in lung cancer; 13.1% and 10.6% versus 6.8% CCW in colorectal cancer), higher frailty rates (27.4% and 22.7% versus 15.0% CCW in lung cancer; 26.4% and 22.3% versus 14.8% CCW in colorectal cancer). Median survival was lower for the Bynum cohorts compared to the CCW, regardless of cancer type. DISCUSSION: Findings demonstrate that ADRD prevalence and certain clinical characteristics vary based on dementia ascertainment method and observation period used to classify individuals with ADRD. Considering differences in the cohorts of registry cases generated by the identification method used is essential when interpreting findings related to treatment, utilization, and outcomes within and across cancer cohorts.

Re-Evaluating the Omission of Radiation Therapy in Low-Risk Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Traditionally, management of early-stage breast cancer has required adjuvant radiation therapy following breast conserving surgery, due to decreased local recurrence and breast cancer mortality. However, over the past decade, there has been an increasing emphasis on potential overtreatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer. This has given rise to questions of how to optimize deintensification of treatment in this cohort of patients while maintaining clinical outcomes. A multitude of studies have focused on identification of a subset of patients with invasive breast cancer who were at low risk of local recurrence based on clinicopathologic features and therefore suitable for RT omission. These studies have failed to identify a subset that does not from RT with respect to local control. Several ongoing trials are evaluating alternative approaches to deintensification while focusing on tumor biology. With regards to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the role of RT has been questioned since breast conservation was utilized. Paralleling invasive disease studies, studies have sought to use clinicopathologic features to identify low risk patients suitable for RT omission but have failed to identify a subset that does not from RT with respect to local control. Use of new assays in patients with DCIS may represent the ideal approach for risk stratification and appropriate deintensification. At this time, when considering deintensification, individualizing treatment decisions with a focus on shared decision making is paramount.

Geriatric assessment for the practicing clinician: The why, what, and how.

Older adults with cancer heterogeneously experience health care, treatment, and symptoms. Geriatric assessment (GA) offers a comprehensive evaluation of an older individual's health status and can predict cancer-related outcomes in individuals with solid tumors and those with hematologic malignancies. In the last decade, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefits of GA and GA management (GAM), which uses GA information to provide tailored intervention strategies to address GA impairments (e.g., implementing physical therapy for impaired physical function). Multiple phase 3 clinical trials in older adults with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies have demonstrated that GAM improves treatment completion, quality of life, communication, and advance care planning while reducing treatment-related toxicity, falls, and polypharmacy. Nonetheless, implementation and uptake of GAM remain challenging. Various strategies have been proposed, including the use of GA screening tools, to identify patients most likely to benefit from GAM, the systematic engagement of the oncology workforce in the delivery of GAM, and the integration of technologies like telemedicine and mobile health to enhance the availability of GA and GAM interventions. Health inequities in minoritized groups persist, and systematic GA implementation has the potential to capture social determinants of health that are relevant to equitable care. Caregivers play an important role in cancer care and experience burden themselves. GA can guide dyadic supportive care interventions, ultimately helping both patients and caregivers achieve optimal health.

A scoping review of diet and exercise interventions for older cancer survivors' physical function.

Lifestyle (diet and exercise) interventions across the cancer care continuum among younger cancer survivors (<60 years of age) demonstrate utility in improving physical function, and other cancer relevant health outcomes. However, the impact of lifestyle interventions on physical function in older (≥60 years) cancer survivors is not entirely clear. This scoping review aims to map and characterize the existing literature on the effect of diet and exercise interventions on physical function in older cancer survivors. Conducted to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported to the PRISMA guidelines, the literature search was performed on multiple databases through March 2024. A total of 19,901 articles were identified for screening with 49 articles published between 2006 and 2024 selected for full-text review. Of these, 36 studies included an exercise intervention, two focused on diet intervention, while 11 studies included both diet and exercise intervention. These 49 studies included various cancer types, cancer stages, and timepoints across the cancer care continuum. Most studies described physical function as their primary outcome and demonstrated maintenance or improvement in physical function. We identified several gaps in the current evidence including lack of (adequately powered) trials focused only on older cancer survivors, and trials focused on dietary interventions alone or dietary interventions combined with exercise interventions within this population vulnerable for nutritional inadequacies and declining physical function. Considering the growing population of older cancer survivors, this represents an important area for further research.

Health-related quality of life in older hematological cancer survivors (70+) compared to older general population-A German cancer-register-based cross-sectional comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: The extent of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impairments in older hematological cancer survivors (HCS) has not been sufficiently studied. We therefore examined HRQOL in older HCS compared to a community sample (CS) and investigated sociodemographic, disease- and treatment-specific, geriatric, and psychosocial factors associated with reduced HRQOL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cancer-register-based cross-sectional comparative study 200 HCS, aged ≥70 years, and 252 persons of an age- and gender-matched CS completed validated questionnaires including the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-ELD14. RESULTS: Older HCS reported a reduced HRQOL in the dimensions of global QOL, physical, role, and social functioning (small clinical significance) and higher symptom burden of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, and poorer mobility compared to the CS (fatigue and mobility with medium, the others with small clinical significance). Perceived disease burden of comorbidities, functional disabilities, psychological distress, and depression showed statistical significance for reduced HRQOL in older HCS in multiple linear regression analysis (R2 = .602, p < .001). DISCUSSION: The screening and treatment of functional limitations and individual symptoms and the integration of a geriatric assessment into oncological practice can help to identify supportive care needs, to implement individualized, patient-centered cancer survivorship care programs and to improve older HCS's HRQOL.

Assessing a Suitable Radiotherapy Utilisation Benchmark for Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

AIMS: To (i) determine the actual radiotherapy utilization (RTU) stratified by age, (ii) develop an age- and co-morbidity adjusted optimal RTU model and (iii) examine the tolerance and toxicity of treatment of older patients with head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study based on New South Wales Cancer Registry records (2010-2014) linked to radiotherapy data (2010-2015) and admitted patient data (2008-2015) for patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer. We calculated the actual RTU, defined as the proportion of patients who received at least one course of radiotherapy within a year of diagnosis, by age group, including patients aged 80+ years. We also calculated the age and comorbidity-adjusted optimal RTU. For treatment tolerance, the radiotherapy dose for each age group and the completion rate for a seven week 70 Gray (Gy) course of curative intent radiotherapy were computed. The number of emergency department (ED) presentations were used as a surrogate measure of acute treatment toxicity for patients receiving 70 Gy. RESULTS: Of the 5966 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer, 814 (13.6%) were aged 80+ years. For all age groups, the actual RTU was less than the optimal RTU. The age- and comorbidity-adjusted optimal RTU for patients aged 80+ was 52% (95% CI: 51%-53%), and the actual RTU was 40% (95% CI: 37%-44%). Only 4.4% of patients aged 80+ received 70 Gy, and the completion rate for a 70 Gy course of radiotherapy for these patients was 92%. The ED presentation rate was similar for all age groups. CONCLUSION: The actual RTU was less in the 80+ years patients and across all age groups. Fewer patients in the 80+ group received curative intent schedules compared to the actual RTU rate for younger age groups, despite similar rates of completion of curative intent radiotherapy and acute toxicity.

The performance of metabolomics-based prediction scores for mortality in older patients with solid tumors.

Prognostic information is needed to balance benefits and risks of cancer treatment in older patients. Metabolomics-based scores were previously developed to predict 5- and 10-year mortality (MetaboHealth) and biological age (MetaboAge). This study aims to investigate the association of MetaboHealth and MetaboAge with 1-year mortality in older patients with solid tumors, and to study their predictive value for mortality in addition to established clinical predictors. This prospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 70 years with a solid malignant tumor, who underwent blood sampling and a geriatric assessment before treatment initiation. The outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. Of the 192 patients, the median age was 77 years. With each SD increase of MetaboHealth, patients had a 2.32 times increased risk of mortality (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.59-3.39). With each year increase in MetaboAge, there was a 4% increased risk of mortality (HR 1.04, 1.01-1.07). MetaboHealth and MetaboAge showed an AUC of 0.66 (0.56-0.75) and 0.60 (0.51-0.68) for mortality prediction accuracy, respectively. The AUC of a predictive model containing age, primary tumor site, distant metastasis, comorbidity, and malnutrition was 0.76 (0.68-0.83). Addition of MetaboHealth increased AUC to 0.80 (0.74-0.87) (p = 0.09) and AUC did not change with MetaboAge (0.76 (0.69-0.83) (p = 0.89)). Higher MetaboHealth and MetaboAge scores were associated with 1-year mortality. The addition of MetaboHealth to established clinical predictors only marginally improved mortality prediction in this cohort with various types of tumors. MetaboHealth may potentially improve identification of older patients vulnerable for adverse events, but numbers were too small for definitive conclusions. The TENT study is retrospectively registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), trial number NL8107. Date of registration: 22-10-2019.

Improving Care for Older Adults with Cancer in Canada: A Call to Action.

Most patients diagnosed with and dying from cancer in Canada are older adults, with aging contributing to the large projected growth in cancer incidence. Older adults with cancer have unique needs, and on a global scale increasing efforts have been made to address recognized gaps in their cancer care. However, in Canada, geriatric oncology remains a new and developing field. There is increasing recognition of the value of geriatric oncology and there is a growing number of healthcare providers interested in developing the field. While there is an increasing number of dedicated programs in geriatric oncology, they remain limited overall. Developing novel methods to delivery geriatric care in the oncology setting and improving visibility is important. Formal incorporation of a geriatric oncology curriculum into training is critical to both improve knowledge and demonstrate its value to healthcare providers. Although a robust group of dedicated researchers exist, increased collaboration is needed to capitalize on existing expertise. Dedicated funding is critical to promoting clinical programs, research, and training new clinicians and leaders in the field. By addressing challenges and capitalizing on opportunities for improvement, Canada can better meet the unique needs of its aging population with cancer and ultimately improve their outcomes.

Outcomes in older adults with metastatic esophageal and gastric carcinoma treated with palliative chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma (GEC) in elderly patients is increasing, yet patients ≥75 years have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. We sought to investigate palliative chemotherapy administration patterns and survival outcomes in older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified patients aged 65-74 (young-old) and ≥75 years (older-old) diagnosed with advanced GEC. Patient and tumor characteristics were recorded, with descriptive analysis, time-to-event data analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis performed. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-eight "young-old" and 109 'older-old' patients were identified. Patient characteristics were similar between groups except for Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI), with lower co-morbidities in the "young-old" compared to "older-old" cohort (P < .001; CCI = 0 in 103 (52%) "young-old" vs 31 (28%) "older-old"). The primary diagnosis in both groups was adenocarcinoma. 119 (60%) "young-old" and 25 (23%) "older-old" patients received chemotherapy (P < .001). Performance status was the primary explanation for chemotherapy non-receipt in both cohorts; age was the explanation in 21 (25%) "older-old" patients and none in the "young-old" patients. PFS for first-line systemic therapy in "young-old" patients was 6.4 (95% CI 5.9-7.6) versus 7.5 months (95% CI 5.1-11.3) in "older-old" patients (P = .69) whilst respective OS was 12.3 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) and 10.4 months (95% CI 9.0-14.6) (P = .0816). Toxicity prompted chemotherapy cessation in 17 (15%) "young-old" and 3 (13%) "older-old" patients (P = .97). Multivariate analysis identified CCI and ECOG performance status as predictive for PFS and OS, respectively. No causative relationship was identified with other variables. CONCLUSION: Our study of real-world older-adults show that significant number of "older-old" patients with GEC do not receive chemotherapy. Among "older-old" adults who do receive systemic therapy, outcomes are comparable; this underscores the importance of geriatric assessment-guided care and suggests that age alone should not be a barrier to receipt of chemotherapy in patients with advanced GEC.

Outcomes from a single institution cohort of 248 patients with stage I-III esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy: Comparison of younger and older populations.

Outcomes for patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for non-metastatic esophageal cancer at a single institution were assessed, as well as the impact of factors including age and intensity modulated RT (IMRT) planning on patient outcomes. A retrospective cohort of patients treated with RT for stage I-III esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2018 was identified. Among 248 identified patients, 28 % identified as older (≥75 years of age). Other than histology, there were no other statistically significant differences in patient and tumour characteristics between the younger and older populations. Treatments varied between the two age groups, with significantly less older patients completing trimodality treatments (17 % vs 58 %). Median overall survival (M-OS) and progression-free survival (M-PFS) were 20 months and 12 months for all patients and 40 months and 26 months for trimodality patients, respectively. In the older patients, the M-OS improved from 13 months for all to 34 months for trimodality patients; and M-PFS from 10 months to 16 months. On multivariate analysis, the use of trimodality therapy showed improved OS (HR 0.26, p < 0.001). In the non-surgical older patient group, significantly better survival was seen in patients who had a heart V30Gy under 46 %. There was no significant difference in M-OS in patients planned with IMRT compared with 3D-conformal RT. Clinical outcomes in the treatment of esophageal cancer vary significantly by treatment approach, with the most favourable results in those receiving trimodality therapy. Among older patients deemed fit after assessment by the multidisciplinary team for trimodality treatments, the M-OS is comparable to the younger patient group.

Health-related quality of life with comprehensive geriatric assessment guided care versus usual care in older adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-guided care improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) in older adults with cancer compared to usual care. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through biomedical databases. Meta-analyses using DerSimonian-Laird model summarized the difference in the mean change of HRQL scores from baseline across various time points, with evidence certainty assessed by the GRADE tool. Logistic regression via generalized estimating equations analyzed predictors of HRQL improvement. RESULTS: Potential improvement in the global HRQL score by CGA-guided care at 3 months (Cohen's d 0.27, 95 % CI -0.03-0.58, moderate certainty), could not be excluded. Larger RCTs or those mandating CGA before initiating anti-cancer treatment were predictors of improved HRQL. CONCLUSION: The effects of CGA-guided care on HRQL were variable. Larger RCTs and those mandating pre-treatment CGA tended to report improved HRQL.