Application and management of continuous glucose monitoring in diabetic kidney disease.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus that contributes to the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Wide glycemic var-iations, such as hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, are broadly found in diabetic patients with DKD and especially ESKD, as a result of impaired renal metabolism. It is essential to monitor glycemia for effective management of DKD. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has long been considered as the gold standard for monitoring glycemia for > 3 months. However, assessment of HbA1c has some bias as it is susceptible to factors such as anemia and liver or kidney dysfunction. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has provided new insights on glycemic assessment and management. CGM directly measures glucose level in interstitial fluid, reports real-time or retrospective glucose concentration, and provides multiple glycemic metrics. It avoids the pitfalls of HbA1c in some contexts, and may serve as a precise alternative to estimation of mean glucose and glycemic variability. Emerging studies have demonstrated the merits of CGM for precise monitoring, which allows fine-tuning of glycemic management in diabetic patients. Therefore, CGM technology has the potential for better glycemic monitoring in DKD patients. More research is needed to explore its application and management in different stages of DKD, including hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation.

Continuous glucose monitoring for inpatient diabetes management: an update on current evidence and practice.

Over the last few years, several exciting changes in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology have expanded its use and made CGM the standard of care for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using insulin therapy. Consequently, hospitals started to notice increased use of these devices in their hospitalized patients. Furthermore during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) pandemic, there was a critical need for innovative approaches to glycemic monitoring, and several hospitals started to implement CGM protocols in their daily practice. Subsequently, a plethora of studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of CGM use in the hospital, leading to clinical practice guideline recommendations. Several studies have also suggested that CGM has the potential to become the standard of care for some hospitalized patients, overcoming the limitations of current capillary glucose testing. Albeit, there is a need for more studies and particularly regulatory approval. In this review, we provide a historical overview of the evolution of glycemic monitoring in the hospital and review the current evidence, implementation protocols, and guidance for the use of CGM in hospitalized patients.

Executive summary of the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: an update based on rapidly emerging new evidence

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) represents a focused update of the KDIGO 2020 guideline on the topic. The guideline targets a broad audience of clinicians treating people with diabetes and CKD. Topic areas for which recommendations are updated based on new evidence include Chapter 1: Comprehensive care in patients with diabetes and CKD and Chapter 4: Glucose-lowering therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CKD. The content of previous chapters on Glycemic monitoring and targets in patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 2), Lifestyle interventions in patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 3), and Approaches to management of patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 5) has been deemed current and was not changed. This guideline update was developed according to an explicit process of evidence review and appraisal. Treatment approaches and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence, and the strength of recommendations followed the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, and areas for which additional research is needed are presented.

Executive summary of the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: an update based on rapidly emerging new evidence.

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) represents a focused update of the KDIGO 2020 guideline on the topic. The guideline targets a broad audience of clinicians treating people with diabetes and CKD. Topic areas for which recommendations are updated based on new evidence include Chapter 1: Comprehensive care in patients with diabetes and CKD and Chapter 4: Glucose-lowering therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CKD. The content of previous chapters on Glycemic monitoring and targets in patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 2), Lifestyle interventions in patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 3), and Approaches to management of patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 5) has been deemed current and was not changed. This guideline update was developed according to an explicit process of evidence review and appraisal. Treatment approaches and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence, and the strength of recommendations followed the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, and areas for which additional research is needed are presented.

Assessment of glycemia in chronic kidney disease.

Reliable assessment of glycemia is central to the management of diabetes. The kidneys play a vital role in maintaining glucose homeostasis through glucose filtration, reabsorption, consumption, and generation. This review article highlights the role of the kidneys in glucose metabolism and discusses the benefits, pitfalls, and evidence behind the glycemic markers in patients with chronic kidney disease. We specifically highlight the role of continuous glucose monitoring as an emerging minimally invasive technique for glycemic assessment.

Use of continuous glucose monitoring system in patients with type 2 mellitus diabetic during hemodialysis treatment.

BACKGROUND: Studies highlight the inaccuracy of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for the assessment of glycemic control in dialysis diabetics and suggest the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) as an alternative. Of the CGMs, FreeStyle Libre® is the most used in worldwide, but there is still no consensus on its use in dialysis. METHOD: A 3-week prospective study was performed with 12 patients comparing capillary and interstitial glucose during dialysis. RESULTS: Comparing capillary and interstitial measurements, similar values were observed in pre-dialysis in the 1st week (184.1 ± 69.5 mg/dl and 173.1 ± 78.9 mg/dl, respectively, p = 0.303), in patients with body mass index less than 24.9 kg/m2 (214.2 ± 72.2 mg/dl and 201.3 ± 77.0 mg/dl respectively, p = 0.466), in those dialysis fluid loss less than 2 l (185.5 ± 82.6 mg/dl and 183.1 ± 94.0 mg/dl respectively and p = 0.805) and in those with hemoglobin greater than 12 g/dl (152.0 ± 35, 5 mg/dl and 129.5 ± 47.4 mg/dl respectively, p = 0.016). In the correlation of the capillary measurement with the interstitial sensor, it was observed that the proportions in the Clarke Error Grid of zone A, zone B, zone C, zone D and zone E were 62.5%, 27.1%, 0.0%, 10.4% and 0.0% respectively and in the Parkes error grid in zone A, zone B, zone C, zone D and zone E were 80.6%, 9.7%, 9.7% 0.0% and 0.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The mean absolute relative difference in dialysis patients is higher than the general population without end-stage renal disease. However, clinical decision-making based on the values measured by the system can be made with a good margin based on the correlation between interstitial and capillary measurements.

Hypoglycemia: Comparison of Health Status Outcomes Between Patients After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) often face lengthy hospital stays. Hospitalized patients' compromised health status puts them at risk for complications to recovery when glucose is not controlled. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate differences in outcomes in patients who experienced hypoglycemia compared to patients who did not experience hypoglycemia post-allogeneic HCT. METHODS: A retrospective chart review and secondary data analysis were conducted. The sample consisted of 198 adult patients hospitalized for their first allogeneic HCT at the University of Minnesota Medical Center between August 2015 and December 2017. Hypoglycemic patients were compared with nonhypoglycemic patients until discharge or 100 hospitalization days post-transplantation. FINDINGS: A total of 20 patients (10%) experienced hypoglycemic events during the study time frame. There were significant differences between the two groups. Hypoglycemia may be a marker for higher acuity illness in this population. Nurses should increase vigilance in managing the blood glucose levels of patients undergoing HCT with known comorbidities and complications.

Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions in septic patients and its association with outcomes: A prospective observational study using continuous glucose monitoring.

PURPOSE: To apply continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and determine the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) in septic patients and to assess the associations of MAGE with outcomes and oxidative stress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in adult septic patients expected to require intensive care for >48 h. We continuously measured blood glucose level for the first 48 h in the ICU using FreeStyle Libre®. MAGE was calculated using glycemic information obtained by CGM during the study period of 48 h. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were 90-day ICU-free days and the concentration of urinary 8-isoprostaglandinF2α measured 48 h after commencement of the study as a surrogate of oxidative stress. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in this study. Median of MAGE was higher in non-survivors than in survivors: 68.8 (IQR;39.7-97.2) vs. 39.3 (IQR;19.9-53.3), p = 0.02. In multivariate analysis, MAGE was independently associated with 90-day all-cause mortality rate (p = 0.02), urinary 8-isoprostaglandinF2α level (p = 0.03) and 90-day ICU-free survival days (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, MAGE for the first 48 h of treatment that was obtained by using CGM was associated with 90-day all-cause mortality, 90-day ICU-free days and urinary 8-isoprostaglandinF2α level in septic patients.

Executive summary of the 2020 KDIGO Diabetes Management in CKD Guideline: evidence-based advances in monitoring and treatment.

THE KIDNEY DISEASE: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease represents the first KDIGO guideline on this subject. The guideline comes at a time when advances in diabetes technology and therapeutics offer new options to manage the large population of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) at high risk of poor health outcomes. An enlarging base of high-quality evidence from randomized clinical trials is available to evaluate important new treatments offering organ protection, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. The goal of the new guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize the clinical care of people with diabetes and CKD by integrating new options with existing management strategies. In addition, the guideline contains practice points to facilitate implementation when insufficient data are available to make well-justified recommendations or when additional guidance may be useful for clinical application. The guideline covers comprehensive care of patients with diabetes and CKD, glycemic monitoring and targets, lifestyle interventions, antihyperglycemic therapies, and self-management and health systems approaches to management of patients with diabetes and CKD.

Boronate-functionalized hydrogel as a novel biosensing interface for the glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) based on the competitive binding with signaling glycoprotein.

According to recent increases in public healthcare costs associated with diabetes mellitus, the development of new glycemic monitoring techniques based on the biosensing of glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), a promising long-term glycemic biomarker, has become a major challenge. In the development of HbA1c biosensors for point-of-care applications, the selection of an effective biorecognition layer that provides a high reaction yield and specificity toward HbA1c is regarded as the most significant issue. To address this, we developed a novel HbA1c biosensing interfacial material by the integration of boronate hydrogel with glass fiber membrane. In the present study, a new boronate-functionalized hydrogel was designed and spatio-selectively photopolymerized on a hydrophilic glass fiber membrane by using N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide, 3-(acrylamido)phenylboronic acid, and bis(N,N'-methylene-bis-acrylamide). Using this approach, the boronic acid group, which specifically recognizes the cis-diol residue of glucose on the HbA1c molecule, can be three-dimensionally coated on the surface of the glass fiber network with a high density. Because this network structure of boronate hydrogel-grafted fibers enables capillary-driven fluid control, facile HbA1c biosensing in a lateral flow assay concept could be accomplished. On the proposed HbA1c biosensing interface, various concentrations of HbA1c (5-15%) in blood-originated samples were sensitively measured by a colorimetric assay using horseradish peroxidase, a glycoenzyme can generate chromogenic signal after the competitive binding against HbA1c to the boronic acid residues. Based on the demonstrated advantages of boronate hydrogel-modified membrane including high analytical performance, easy operation, and cost-effectiveness, we expect that the proposed biorecognition interfacial material can be applied not only to point-of-care HbA1c biosensors, but also to the quantitative analysis of other glycoprotein biomarkers.