Clinicopathological and prognostic features of HER2-null and HER2-low advanced breast cancer treated with eribulin or capecitabine.

BACKGROUND: HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45-1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72-1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases. CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups.

Effect of HER2-low status on brain metastasis-free survival and survival after brain metastasis in patients with breast cancer.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The discovery of novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody‒drug conjugates has accelerated the identification of the HER2-low subtype. However, the biological significance of low HER2 expression in breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is unclear. METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative BC and brain metastasis were retrospectively screened between February 2012 and November 2023. Brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and survival after brain metastasis (SABM) were analyzed according to HER2 expression. RESULTS: A total of 201 female patients, 84 of whom were HER2-low and 117 of whom were HER2-zero, were evaluated. The median BMFS in the entire cohort was 35.6 months (95% CI 29.8-41.4). Although HER2-low patients had numerically longer median BMFS than HER2-zero patients (43.7 m vs. 30.1 m, p = 0.025), multivariate analysis revealed that the difference was not significant (p = 0.167). BMFS between the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was similar in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive (52.8 m vs. 47.6 m, p = 0.276) and HR-negative (15.3 m vs. 19.7 m, p = 0.930) cohorts. The median SABM in the entire cohort was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.8-8.1). HER2-low and HER2-zero patients had similar median SAMB (5.4 m vs. 6.1 m, p = 0.816). The SABM between the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was similar in the HR-positive (6.3 m vs. 8.7 m, p = 0.375) and HR-negative (3.3 m vs. 4.2 m, p = 0.783) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Low HER2 expression does not affect BMFS or SAMB in brain metastatic breast cancer patients in this real-world population.

Interobserver Variability in HER-2 Immunostaining Interpretation of Metastatic HER2 Low Breast Cancers in Cytology Specimens.

BACKGROUND: Approximately, 55% of breast carcinomas are reported to be HER-2 low breast carcinomas. Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan is a new FDA-approved targeted therapy for HER-2 low metastatic breast carcinomas, making it essential that all efforts are made to identify these tumors in specimens submitted for pathologic examination. Cytology specimens are often the first and only modality of this assessment due to the ease of specimen procurement. This study aimed to determine the variability in HER-2 immunostaining interpretation among observers using cytologic specimens from metastatic sites. DESIGN: A pathology database search was made to identify metastatic breast carcinoma reported in cytology specimens. A manual search was then done to identify cases of HER-2 low category, H&E cell block and HER-2 neu immunostain slides were retrieved for a total of 50 cases. Reviewer #1 and #2 independently interpreted HER-2 immunostain of all 50 cases. Only discordant cases were sent for reviewer-3 interpretation. All three were blinded by the metastatic site, and original HER-2 interpretation. RESULTS: Of 50 cases, 11 cases (22%) were reported as concordant scores between reviewer #1 and reviewer #2 but had a discordant original IHC report. Additionally, 4 cases (8%) had discordant reporting of HER2 IHC stain between reviewer #1 and reviewer #2 making a total of 15 cases (30%) with overall discordant results. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the interobserver variability of HER-2 immunostain interpretation for HER-2 low category of breast carcinomas. We recommend the need for more robust laboratory techniques including molecular for uniform identification of these unique targetable metastatic breast carcinoma groups.

Understanding the spectrum of HER2 status in breast cancer: From HER2-positive to ultra-low HER2.

HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status in breast cancer spans a spectrum from HER2-positive to ultra-low HER2, each category influencing prognosis and treatment decisions differently. Approximately 20 % of breast cancers overexpress HER2, correlating with aggressive disease and poorer outcomes without targeted therapy. HER2 status is determined through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), guiding therapeutic strategies. HER2-positive breast cancer exhibits HER2 protein overexpression or gene amplification, benefiting from HER2-targeted therapies like trastuzumab and pertuzumab. In contrast, HER2-negative breast cancer lacks HER2 overexpression and amplification, treated based on hormone receptor status. HER2-low breast cancer represents a newly recognized category with low HER2 expression, potentially benefiting from evolving therapies. Ultra-low HER2 cancers, characterized by minimal expression without gene amplification, challenge conventional classifications and treatment paradigms. Their distinct molecular profiles and clinical behaviors suggest unique therapeutic approaches. Recent diagnostic guideline updates refine HER2 assessment, enhancing precision in identifying patients for targeted therapies. Challenges remain in accurately classifying HER2-low tumors and optimizing treatment efficacy, necessitating ongoing research and innovative diagnostic methods. Understanding the heterogeneity and evolving landscape of HER2 status in breast cancer is crucial for advancing personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Patient characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer, a single site descriptive study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of different HER2 categories among patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC) and describe treatment patterns and outcomes of those with HER2-low disease. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted via chart review at the Huntsman Cancer Institute, including patients diagnosed with aBC (stages IIIB, IIIC and IV) between 2010 and 2019. All patients with IHC1+ were considered HER2-low unless FISH was positive. Patients with IHC2+ were only classified as HER2-low if a negative FISH was documented. The prevalence and characteristics of each HER2 category were reported. Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of HER2-low patients who received first line treatment in 2017 or later were presented. RESULTS: A total of 240 of 414 patients (58%) with aBC were HER2-low, with the majority of patients (83%) classified as hormone receptor (HR)-positive. In first line, most HR-positive patients received endocrine therapy with chemotherapy for stage IIIB/IIIC (47%) and with CDK4/6 inhibitors for stage IV breast cancer (50%) Most HR-negative patients received chemotherapy alone (92% for stage IIIB/IIIC, 60% for stage IV). In second line, chemotherapy alone was the most common modality (21.4% for HR-positive; 45.5% for HR-negative). Median overall survival was 37.7 months while median progression-free survival from first line was 18.0 months, decreasing to 8.0 months in second line. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients previously classified as HER2-negative have low but detectable HER2 expression and may benefit from novel HER2-directed agents, which have demonstrated clinical benefit in this population post-chemotherapy.

Comprehensive Assessment of Immune Phenotype and Its Effects on Survival Outcomes in HER2-Low versus HER2-Zero Breast Cancer.

Background: The understanding of molecular characteristics of HER2-low breast cancer is evolving since the establishment of trastuzumab deruxtecan. Here, we explore the differences in expression patterns of immune-related genes in the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) and survival between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers. Methods: Comprehensive genomic and immune profiling, including RNA-seq gene expression assessment of 395 immune genes, was performed on FFPE samples from 129 patients with advanced HER2-negative (immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, 1+ or 2+ with negative ERBB2 amplification by in-situ hybridization) breast cancer. Both estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 statuses were obtained from available pathology reports. mRNA expressions of immune biomarkers, except for PD-L1 IHC and TMB, were derived from RNA-seq. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test or the two-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction (p≤0.05 for significance). Survival differences were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis (p≤0.05 for significance). Results: There were no significant differences in mRNA expressions of immune-related genes between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers. However, HER2-low breast cancers were associated with a higher proportion of ER-positivity. When ER was analyzed along with HER2, we observed a significantly higher tumor immunogenic signature (TIGS) expression in HER2-zero/ER-negative tumors than in HER2-low/ER-positive tumors (p=0.0088). Similarly, lower expression of PD-L1 and T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) mRNA was observed in HER2-low/ER-positive tumors when compared to HER2-zero/ER-negative tumors (p=0.014 and 0.012, respectively). Patients with HER2-low tumors had a longer median OS than those with HER2-zero tumors (94 months vs 42 months, p=0.0044). Conclusion: Patients with HER2-low breast cancer have longer survivals yet display no differences in immune-related gene expression when compared to those with HER2-zero cancers. The differences in survival can be attributed to the higher rate of ER-positivity seen in HER2-low breast cancers, compared to HER2-zero tumors.

Frequency of Deleterious Germline Variants in HER2-Low Breast Cancer Patients Using a Hereditary Multipanel Gene Testing.

HER2-Low is defined as low levels of HER2 expression, based on a score of 1+ on immunohistochemical (IHC) assay or as an IHC score of 2+ and negative results on in situ hybridization (ISH or FISH). They are a heterogeneous population of breast cancers that vary in prognosis and sensitivity to systemic treatments. The frequency and clinical characteristics of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in HER2-Low breast cancer (BC) patients is not defined. We analyzed results from patients with BC who underwent multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) (maximum 145 genes) between 2018-2019. We reclassified HER-2 status accordingly. Relationships between the variables of interest were assessed by adopting the proportional regression Cox models. Of a total of 167 BC patients who underwent MGPT, half were hormone-receptor-positive. The median age was 45 years. About two thirds of the patients were in the earlier stage of BC. A total of 57% of the cases were reclassified as HER-2-negative or -Low. PGVs were found in 19% of the patients overall, as follows: seven BRCA1, four BRCA2, two ATM, one ATR, two CFTR, three CHEK2, one FANCA, one MERTK, one MLH1, three MUTYH, one RAD50, three RAD51C, one RECQL4, and two TP53 mutations. In HER2-Low, 26.5% of the patients had PGVs, and in the overall cohort, this was 19.8%. In conclusion, differences in the prevalence of deleterious germline mutations in HER2-Low BC patients compared to non-HER2-Low BC patients were identified. Similar alterations in BRCA were observed in this group of patients compared to the overall cohort. Germline genetic tests should be evaluated in larger cohorts of patients with HER2-Low status to better address the findings.

Best practices for achieving consensus in HER2-low expression in breast cancer: current perspectives from practising pathologists.

AIMS: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is an important biomarker in breast cancer (BC). Most BC cases categorised as HER2-negative (HER2-) express low levels of HER2 [immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC 2+/in-situ hybridisation not amplified (ISH-)] and represent a clinically relevant therapeutic category that is amenable to targeted therapy using a recently approved HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate. A group of practising pathologists, with expertise in breast pathology and BC biomarker testing, outline best practices and guidance for achieving consensus in HER2 IHC scoring for BC. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors describe current knowledge and challenges of IHC testing and scoring of HER2-low expressing BC and provide best practices and guidance for accurate identification of BCs expressing low levels of HER2. These expert pathologists propose an algorithm for assessing HER2 expression with validated IHC assays and incorporate the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologist guideline update. The authors also provide guidance on when to seek consensus for HER2 IHC scoring, how to incorporate HER2-low into IHC reporting and present examples of HER2 IHC staining, including challenging cases. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of BC cases that are negative for HER protein overexpression/gene amplification and the related clinical relevance for targeted therapy highlight the importance of accurate HER2 IHC scoring for optimal treatment selection.

Efficacy and prognosis of HER2-Low and HER2-Zero in triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Mounting evidence showed that HER2-Low breast cancer patients could benefit from the novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) treatment, which pointed the way towards better therapy for HER2-Low patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinicopathological features, along with chemotherapeutic effects and survival outcomes of HER2-Low and HER2-Zero in TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We retrospectively evaluated 638 triple-negative breast cancer patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between August 2014 and August 2022. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes were analyzed in HER2-Low cohort, HER2-Zero cohort and the overall patients, respectively. In the entire cohort, 342 (53.6%) patients were HER2-Low and 296 (46.4%) patients were HER2-Zero. No significant difference was found between HER2-Low and HER2-Zero patients based on all the clinical-pathological characteristics. 143 cases (22.4%) achieved pCR after NACT in the overall TNBC patients. The pCR rate of the HER2-Low patients and the HER2-Zero patients was 21.3% and 23.6%, respectively, exhibiting no statistical difference (p = 0.487). The survival of pCR group after NACT significantly improved compared to non-pCR group either in HER2-Low patients or in HER2-Zero patients. Although we found that patients with HER2-Low had longer DFS than patients with HER2-Zero, there was no considerable difference (p = 0.068). However, HER2-Low patients had a dramatically longer OS than HER2-Zero patients (p = 0.012). The data from present study confirmed the clinical importance of HER2-Low expression in TNBC. Further effort is needed to determine whether HER2-Low could be a more favorable prognostic marker for individual treatment.

Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancers.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate machine learning models for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-zero and HER2-low using MRI features pre-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). METHODS: Five hundred and sixteen breast cancer patients post-NAT surgery were randomly divided into training (n = 362) and internal validation sets (n = 154) for model building and evaluation. MRI features (tumour diameter, enhancement type, background parenchymal enhancement, enhancement pattern, percentage of enhancement, signal enhancement ratio, breast oedema, and apparent diffusion coefficient) were reviewed. Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbour (KNN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models utilized MRI characteristics for HER2 status assessment in training and validation datasets. The best-performing model generated a HER2 score, which was subsequently correlated with pathological complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The XGBoost model outperformed LR, SVM, and KNN, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.783 (95% CI, 0.733-0.833) and 0.787 (95% CI, 0.709-0.865) in the validation dataset. Its HER2 score for predicting pCR had an AUC of 0.708 in the training datasets and 0.695 in the validation dataset. Additionally, the low HER2 score was significantly associated with shorter DFS in the validation dataset (hazard ratio: 2.748, 95% CI, 1.016-7.432, P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: The XGBoost model could help distinguish HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancers and has the potential to predict pCR and prognosis in breast cancer patients undergoing NAT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: HER2-low-expressing breast cancer can benefit from the HER2-targeted therapy. Prediction of HER2-low expression is crucial for appropriate management. MRI features offer a solution to this clinical issue.

Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical HER2-low detection in an interlaboratory study.

AIMS: Recently, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low (i.e. HER2 score 1+ or 2+ without amplification) breast cancer patients became eligible for trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment. To improve assay standardisation and detection of HER2-low in a quantitative manner, we conducted an external quality assessment-like study in the Netherlands. Dynamic range cell lines and immunohistochemistry (IHC) calibrators were used to quantify HER2 expression and to assess interlaboratory variability. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three blank slides with a dynamic range cell line and an IHC calibrator were stained with routine HER2 assays by 35 laboratories. Four different antibody clones were used: 19 (54.3%) 4B5, six (17.1%) A0485, five (14.3%) DG44 (HercepTest) and five (14.3%) SP3. Laboratories used two different detection kits for 4B5 assays: 14 (73.7%) ultraView and five (26.3%) OptiView. Variability of HER2 expression in cell lines, measured with artificial intelligence software, was median (min-max) = negative core 0.5% (0.0-57.0), 1+ core 4.3% (1.6-71.3), 2+ core 42.8% (30.4-92.6) and 3+ core 96.2% (91.8-98.8). The calibrators DG44 and 4B5 OptiView had the highest analytical sensitivity, closely followed by 4B5 ultraView. SP3 was the least sensitive. Calibrators of A0485 assays were not analysable due to background staining. CONCLUSIONS: As assays were validated for detecting HER2-amplified tumours, not all assays and antibodies proved suitable for HER2-low detection. Some tests showed distinct expression in the negative cell line. Dynamic range cell line controls and quantitative analysis using calibrators demonstrated more interlaboratory variability than commonly appreciated. Revalidation of HER2 tests by laboratories is needed to ensure clinical applicable HER2-low assays.

The Prognostic Impact of HER2-Low and Menopausal Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

TNBC is noted for its aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Recently developed HER2 target agents have shown potential benefit even in HER2-low expressing breast cancers. This study retrospectively analyzed 2542 non-metastatic TNBC patients from 2008 to 2020, revealing that 26.0% were HER2-low. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. The HER2-low group, compared to the HER2-0 group, showed significantly better DFS, DMFS, OS, BCSS (p = 0.0072, p = 0.0096, p = 0.0180, and p = 0.0001, respectively) with older age and higher rates of postmenopausal status (p < 0.0001). No significant differences in pCR rates were observed. Multivariate analyses identified HER2 status as a significant prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.048), DMFS (p = 0.018), OS (p = 0.049), and BCSS (p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis revealed that these effects varied with menopausal status, showing more pronounced benefits in postmenopausal women. Our findings suggest that HER2-low TNBC patients exhibit a distinct clinical profile and improved survival compared to HER2-0 TNBC patients, especially in postmenopausal patients. Further research on estrogen and HER2 interaction is needed.

Insights Into the Emerging Entity of HER2-Low Breast Cancer.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer (BC) is a subtype of BC that has been recently recognized as a separate clinical entity with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. It is defined by a low level of HER2 protein expression, which distinguishes it from other more aggressive BC subtypes. Early studies suggest that it may have a more favorable prognosis than HER2-positive BC, as it is less likely to spread to other parts of the body and may be more responsive to standard BC treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy. Given the relative new emergence of HER2-low BC, there is still much to be learned about this subtype; ongoing research is focused on identifying the underlying genetic mutations that contribute to HER2-low BC as well as developing targeted therapies that can improve outcomes for patients with this disease. This review is aimed at summarizing the current clinical knowledge on HER2-low BC, with the aim of creating a better understanding of this entity and paving the way for potential interventions and a new standard of care.

Consensus Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Low Testing in Breast Cancer in Malaysia.

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in Malaysia. Recently, a new nomenclature was introduced for breast cancers with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+, or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization (ISH), i.e., HER2-low breast cancer. In current clinical practice, these breast cancers are reported as HER2-negative. Clinical trials have shown that HER2-low breast cancer benefits from targeted therapy with anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. Unfortunately, various challenges and obstacles are faced by local pathologists in HER2 testing, which may jeopardize the standard of care for patients with HER2-low breast cancer. This consensus guideline aims to elucidate standard practices pertaining to HER2 testing and HER2-low interpretation in Malaysia. Topics discussed among a panel of local experts include tissue sampling and handling, assay and antibody selection, result interpretation and reporting, and quality assurance. Practice recommendations made in this consensus guideline reflect current international guidelines and, where appropriate, adapted to the Malaysian landscape.

Alteration of HER2 Status During Breast Cancer Progression: A Clinicopathological Analysis Focusing on HER2-Low Status.

Recent studies have shown that novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) can improve clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-low breast cancers. This study aimed to investigate alteration of HER2 status during breast cancer progression with an emphasis on HER2-low status. Using 386 paired samples of primary and recurrent breast cancers, HER2 discordance rate between primary and matched recurrent samples, the relationships between HER2 discordance and clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed. HER2 discordance rate between primary breast cancer and first recurrence was 25.9% (κ = 0.586) with mostly zero-to-low (10.6%) or low-to-zero (9.3%) conversion. There was no significant difference in the discordant rates according to type or location of the recurrence. Of 70 cases with a second recurrence, HER2 discordance rate between the primary tumor and the second recurrence was 27.1% (κ = 0.554). HER2 discordance was associated with lower HER2 level, lymphovascular invasion, and progesterone receptor positivity of the primary tumor. In further analyses, HER2-zero-to-low conversion was associated with lymph node metastasis and hormone receptor (HR) positivity, whereas HER2-low-to-zero conversion was associated with HR negativity and triple-negative subtype. In survival analyses, HER2 discordance was associated with decreased overall survival of patients in the HR-positive group but not in the HR-negative group. Furthermore, patients with HER2-low-to-zero converted tumors showed worse overall survival compared with those with HER2-low concordant tumors. In conclusion, HER2 status changes during breast cancer progression in significant proportions, mostly between zero and low status. As HER2 instability increases during progression and affects clinical outcome, HER2 status needs to be reevaluated in recurrent settings.

Advancing HER2-low breast cancer management: enhancing diagnosis and treatment strategies.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence brought by novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugates is leading to significant changes in HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) best practices. A new targetable category termed 'HER2-low' has been identified in tumors previously classified as 'HER2-negative'. Daily practice in pathology and medical oncology is expected to align to current recommendations, but patient access to novel anticancer drugs across geographies might be impeded due to local challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An expert meeting involving ten regional pathology and oncology opinion leaders experienced in BC management in four Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia) was held. Herein we summarized the current situation of HER2-low metastatic BC (mBC), local challenges, and action plans to prevent delays in patient access to testing and treatment based on expert opinion. RESULTS: Gaps and differences at multiple levels were identified across the four countries. These included variability in the local HER2-low epidemiology data, certification of pathology laboratories and quality control, and reimbursement conditions of testing and anticancer drugs for HER2-negative mBC. While clinical decisions were aligned to international guidelines in use, optimal access to testing and innovative treatment was restricted due to significant delays in reimbursement or limitative reimbursement conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Preventing delays in HER2-low mBC patient access to diagnosis and novel treatments is crucial to optimize outcomes. Multidisciplinary joint efforts and pro-active discussions between clinicians and decision makers are needed to improve care of HER2-low mBC patients in CEE countries.

Unraveling the clinicopathological and molecular changes induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-low and HER2-0 breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The characterization and comparison of gene expression and intrinsic subtype (IS) changes induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low versus HR+/HER2-0 breast cancer (BC) has not been conducted so far. Most evidence on the association of HER2 status with pathologic responses and prognosis in HR+/HER2-negative BC is controversial and restricted to NACT-treated disease. Similarly, a temporal heterogeneity in HER2 status has been described only with NACT. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited a consecutive cohort of 186 patients with stage I-IIIB HR+/HER2-negative BC treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Available diagnostic biopsies and surgical samples were characterized for main pathological features, PAM50 IS and ROR-P score, and gene expression. Associations with pathologic complete response, residual cancer burden-0/I, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) based on HER2 status were assessed. Pre/post pathologic/molecular changes were analyzed in matched samples. RESULTS: The HER2-low (62.9%) and HER2-0 (37.1%) cohorts did not differ significantly in main baseline features, treatments administered, breast-conserving surgery, pathologic complete response and residual cancer burden-0/I rates, EFS, and OS. NAT induced, regardless of HER2 status, a significant reduction of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and Ki67 levels, a down-regulation of PAM50 proliferation- and luminal-related genes/signatures, an up-regulation of selected immune genes, and a shift towards less aggressive IS and lower ROR-P. Moreover, 25% of HER2-0 changed to HER2-low and 34% HER2-low became HER2-0. HER2 shifts were significant after NACT (P < 0.001), not neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (P = 0.063), with consistent ERBB2 mRNA level dynamics. HER2 changes were not associated with EFS/OS. CONCLUSIONS: HER2-low and HER2-0 status change after NAT in ∼30% of cases, mostly after NACT. Targeted adjuvant strategies should be investigated accordingly. Molecular downstaging with current chemo/endocrine agents and immunotherapy should not rely on HER2 immunohistochemical levels in HR+/HER2-negative BC. Instead, HER2-low-targeted approaches should be explored to pursue more effective and/or less toxic dimensional downstaging.

Exploring a Novel Approach to Spare Classic Chemotherapy in HER2-Low, ER-Positive Breast Cancer Based on Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Combined with Endocrine Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer presents diverse molecular subtypes affecting treatment strategies. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer poses a challenge due to limited targeted therapies. Current neoadjuvant treatment primarily utilizes chemotherapy, with conflicting results regarding efficacy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) shows promise in HER2-low metastatic disease, and preliminary evidence suggests synergy with endocrine therapy. OBJECTIVE: This editorial explores the hypothesis that neoadjuvant T-DXd with or without endocrine therapy offers efficacy in the clinical management of HR+/HER2-low breast cancer. METHODS: We propose a phase II study with two treatment arms: T-DXd + letrozole and T-DXd alone. The primary endpoint is the radiological complete response rate. Secondary endpoints include pathological complete response rate, safety, event-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses will compare the arms to identify potential for optimizing treatment efficacy and minimizing side effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study design allows for initial assessment of T-DXd with or without endocrine therapy in the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer. The findings may pave the way for personalized treatment strategies and inform future research, potentially leading to a chemotherapy-sparing approach.

A population-based study on trajectories of HER2 status during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer and metastatic progression.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the distribution and changes of HER2 status in untreated tumours, in residual disease and in metastasis, and their long-term prognostic implications. METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer during 2007-2020 in the Stockholm-Gotland region which comprises 25% of the entire Swedish population. Information was extracted from the National Breast Cancer Registry and electronic patient charts to minimize data missingness and misclassification. RESULTS: In total, 2494 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of which 2309 had available pretreatment HER2 status. Discordance rates were 29.9% between primary and residual disease (kappa = 0.534), 31.2% between primary tumour and metastasis (kappa = 0.512) and 33.3% between residual disease to metastasis (kappa = 0.483). Adjusted survival curves differed between primary HER2 0 and HER2-low disease (p < 0.001), with the former exhibiting an early peak in risk for death which eventually declined below the risk of HER2-low. Across all disease settings, increasing the number of biopsies increased the likelihood of detecting HER2-low status. CONCLUSION: HER2 status changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and metastatic progression, and the long-term behaviours of HER2 0 and HER2-low disease differ, underscoring the need for obtaining tissue biopsies and for extended follow-up in breast cancer studies.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician's choice in previously treated Asian patients with HER2-low unresectable/metastatic breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the DESTINY-Breast04 study.

BACKGROUND: In the global phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 study (NCT03734029), the anti-human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with manageable safety compared with treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who had received 1-2 prior lines of chemotherapy. METHODS: This subgroup analysis examined the efficacy and safety of T-DXd versus TPC in 213 patients from Asian countries and regions who were enrolled in the DESTINY-Breast04 trial and randomized to T-DXd (n = 147) or TPC (n = 66). RESULTS: Median PFS with T-DXd and TPC was 10.9 and 5.3 months, respectively, in Asian patients with hormone receptor-positive mBC, and 10.9 and 4.6 months, respectively, in the overall Asian population. In both populations, median OS was not reached with T-DXd and was 19.9 months with TPC. The objective response rate was higher with T-DXd versus TPC in all Asian patients. Median treatment duration was 8.4 months with T-DXd and 3.5 months with TPC. The most common grade ≥ 3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events in Asian patients treated with T-DXd were neutropenia (16.3%), anemia (12.9%), and leukopenia (11.6%); the incidences of neutropenia and leukopenia were higher with TPC versus T-DXd. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis with T-DXd was 14.3%; the majority of events were grade 1-2. CONCLUSIONS: T-DXd demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits versus TPC in Asian HER2-low mBC patients, regardless of hormone receptor status, with no new safety signals. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03734029.