Efficacy and tolerance of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) according to the number of instillations administered.

PURPOSE: To report the oncological outcomes and the tolerance between 6 instillations and more than 6 cycles of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy(HIVEC) in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer(NMIBC). METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study from a national database including 9 expert centers. All patients treated with HIVEC between 2016 and 2023 for NMIBC were included. Patients were classified into two groups according to the total number of HIVEC instillations, including induction plus maintenance. Kaplan-Meier curves were computed to present survival outcomes. RESULTS: 261 patients with a median follow-up of 25.5 months were included. 199(76.2%) and 62(23.8%) were treated by 6 and more than 6 cycles of HIVEC, respectively. The 2-years RFS(40.2% vs. 34.4%,p = 0.3) and the 2-years PFS(86% vs. 87%,p = 0.85) were similar between group treated with 6 and more than 6 instillations. 2-years CSS and OS were also similar between both groups. Univariate Cox regression showed no association between the number of bladder instillation and RFS (HR = 1.2 95%CI[0.8-1.84], p = 0.3) or PFS (HR = 0.8 95%CI[0.29-2.02], p = 0.2). In the group treated with more than 6 cycles, 2-years RFS and 2-years PFS were similar between patients who received induction plus maintenance compared to those treated with induction only. Finally, hematuria and urinary burning were significantly higher in the group treated by more than 6 cycles (21% vs. 8.5%(p < 0.01),and 29% vs. 17% (p = 0.03), respectively). Serious side effects(grade ≥ 3) are rare(3.1%) and similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results show no significant difference in two years RFS, PFS, CSS and OS according to number of instillations received, while toxicity profile seems better in the group receiving six instillations only.

HIVEC as an alternative option in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Experiences from a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: High risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is usually treated with intravesical BCG-therapy. In case of BCG failure radical cystectomy (RC) is the treatment of choice. Nevertheless, many patients are unfit for or unwilling to undergo RC. Hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) is a promising bladder sparing therapy in such cases. It was the purpose of the study to evaluate the efficacy of HIVEC in patients with BCG failure as well as in BCG naïve patients in case of BCG shortage or given contra-indications for BCG. METHODS: We analyzed the first 60 patients who received hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) at our department. The therapy regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly sessions, followed by a maintenance course with 6 monthly sessions. Fluorescence cystoscopy with urine cytology and bladder mapping was performed after completion of induction and maintenance therapy at 3 and 12 months. About 68.6 % had received a recurrence after or during BCG treatment, 55% of the subjects were BCG-unresponsive NMIBC according to EAU guidelines. RESULTS: The median follow up was 12 months with 12 cycles of HIVEC therapy being administered on average, representing completion of induction and maintenance therapy with 6 cycles each. The 1- and 2-year recurrence-free-survival (RFS) was 67% and 40% respectively. Only one out of 60 patients developed progression to muscle invasion with progression-free-survival (PFS) of 98% at 2 years. No statistical differences were found in RFS for patients failure to BCG compared to patients that were BCG-naïve (BCG unresponsive vs. BCG-naïve) and patients that carried carcinoma in situ (CIS) compared to patients without CIS (CIS vs. no CIS). CONCLUSION: Chemohyperthermia using HIVEC results in high recurrence-free survival and a 2-year progression-free survival rate of 98% with a bladder preservation rate of almost 80%. Comparing our data, HIVEC shows better oncological results together with better tolerability and safety making HIVEC a good alternative for patients who refuse radical cystectomy or who are ineligible for radical cystectomy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of different treatment modalities in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

OBJECTIVE: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care (SOC) in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC and is associated with a significant health-related quality-of-life burden. Recently, promising results have been published on Gemcitabine/Docetaxel, Pembrolizumab, and Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) as salvage therapy options trying to increase the rate of bladder preservation. Here, we performed a Cost-Effectiveness-Analysis of those treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed a Markov model from a payer's perspective drawing on clinical data of single-arm trials testing intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel and pembrolizumab in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, as well as clinical data from patients receiving hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy HIVEC (n = 29) as intravesical salvage chemotherapy at our uro-oncological centre in Cologne. Costs were simulated utilising a non-commercial diagnosis-related groups grouper, utilities were derived from comparable cost-effectiveness studies. We used a Monte Carlo simulation to identify the optimal treatment, comparing the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50 000 (euro)/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). RESULTS: Over a horizon of 10 years, gemcitabine/docetaxel, HIVEC, and pembrolizumab were associated with costs of €48 353, €64 438, and €204 580, as well as a gain of QALYs of 6.16, 6.48, and 6.00, resulting in an ICER of €26 482, €42 567, and €184 533 respectively, in comparison to RC with total costs of €21 871 and a gain of QALYs of 5.01. Monte Carlo simulation identified HIVEC as the treatment of choice under assumption of a WTP of <€50 000. CONCLUSION: Considering a WTP of <€50 000/QALY, gemcitabine/docetaxel and HIVEC are highly cost-effective therapeutic options in BCG-refractory NMIBC, while RC remains the cheapest option. At its current price, pembrolizumab would only be cost-effective assuming a price reduction of at least 70%.

Hyperthermia intravesical chemotherapy acts as a promising alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin instillation in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Introduction: With the shortage of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, it is important to find an alternative to BCG instillation, which is the most commonly used adjuvant treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients after transurethral resection of bladder tumor treatment (TURBt) to delay tumor recurrence. Hyperthermia intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with mitomycin C (MMC) is a potential treatment choice. We aim to compare HIVEC with BCG instillation for the preventive efficacy of bladder tumor recurrence and progression. Methods: A network meta-analysis (NMA) was taken with MMC instillation and TURBt as the attached comparators. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with NIMBC patients after TURBt were included. Articles with pure BCG unresponsive patients and combined therapies were excluded. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42023390363). Results: It was found that HIVEC had a non-significant 22% relative reduction in bladder tumor recurrence compared with BCG instillation [HIVEC vs. BCG: HR 0.78, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.55-1.08] and a nonsignificant higher risk of bladder tumor progression (BCG vs. HIVEC: HR 0.77, 95% CrI 0.22-3.03). Discussion: HIVEC is a potential alternative to BCG, and it is expected to be the standard therapy for NMIBC patients after TURBt during the global shortage of BCG. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO identifier, CRD42023390363.

Is CIS a Contraindication to Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) after BCG-Failure?

CIS of the bladder is associated with a high risk of progression. In the case of BCG failure, radical cystectomy should be performed. For patients who refuse or are ineligible, bladder-sparing alternatives are evaluated. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of Hyperthermic IntraVesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) depending on the presence or absence of CIS. This retrospective, multicenter study was conducted between 2016 and 2021. Patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with BCG failure received 6-8 adjuvant instillations of HIVEC. The co-primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 116 consecutive patients met our inclusion criteria of whom 36 had concomitant CIS. The 2-year RFS rate was 19.9% and 43.7% in patients with and without CIS, respectively (p = 0.52). Fifteen patients (12.9%) experienced progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer with no significant difference between patients with and without CIS (2-year PFS rate = 71.8% vs. 88.8%, p = 0.32). In multivariate analysis, CIS was not a significant prognostic factor in terms of recurrence or progression. In conclusion, CIS may not be considered a contraindication to HIVEC, as there is no significant association between CIS and the risk of progression or recurrence after treatment.

A Multicenter Study of 2-year Outcomes Following Hyperthermia Therapy with Mitomycin C in Treating Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: HIVEC-E.

INTRODUCTION: High grade, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is usually treated with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Chemohyperthermia therapy (CHT) may be a novel alternative therapy for the treatment of NMIBC. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients treated with CHT using the Combat bladder recirculation system (BRS) for NMIBC. METHODS: This was a prospective multi-institutional study of 1,028 consecutive patients with NMIBC undergoing CHT between 2012 and 2020. A total of 835 patients were treated with CHT with Mitomycin C (MMC). Disease was confirmed on transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) prior to starting CHT. Follow-up included cystoscopy and subsequent TURBT if recurrence/progression was suspected. The primary endpoint was RFS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events from CHT. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median follow up was 22.4 months (Interquartile range (IQR): 12.8 -35.8). Median age was 70.4 years (IQR: 62.1 -78.6). A total of 557 (66.7%), 172 (20.6) and 74 (8.9%) of patients were classified to BCG naïve, BCG unresponsive and BCG failure, respectively. The RFS at 12 months and 24 months for BCG naïve was 87.6% (95% CI 85.0% - 90.4%) and 75.0% (95% CI 71.3% - 78.8%), respectively. The RFS at 12 months and 24 months for BCG unresponsive cohort was 78.1% (95% CI 72.0% - 84.7%) and 57.4% (95% CI 49.7% - 66.3%), respectively. The RFS at 24 months for the BCG unresponsive cohort for CIS with/without papillary disease and papillary only disease were 43.6% (95% CI 31.4% -60.4%) and 64.5% (95% CI 55.4% - 75.1%), respectively. Minor adverse events occurred in 216 (25.6%) patients and severe events occurred in 17 (2.0%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: CHT with MMC using the Combat BRS is effective in the medium term and has a favorable adverse event profile.

Adverse events of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is one of the most frequent neoplasms in Denmark. Treatment of high-risk NMIBC usually consists of transurethral resection of bladder (TUR-B) followed by intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations. Unfortunately, some patients are BCG-unresponsive and will relapse over time. Radical cystectomy is the recommended salvage treatment following BCG-failure or BCG-intolerance. However, not all patients are candidates for surgery and thus, in need of other treatment. This study investigates the adverse events of Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) treatment. METHODS: Twenty-three high-risk NMIBC patients, who were BCG-unresponsive or had contraindications for BCG, received HIVEC with Mitomycin C. Prior to each instillation, patients were interviewed by a nurse, using a systematic questionnaire regarding the adverse events. Patients were followed with cytology and cystoscopy every fourth month. The primary outcome was adverse event related to the HIVEC treatment. RESULTS: In general, the adverse events were mild to moderate and often self-limiting. The most common adverse events were urinary frequency (23.6%), incontinence (19.4%) and urinary tract pain (12.2%). CONCLUSION: In the current study, we found that HIVEC was a well-tolerated treatment. HIVEC might be a feasible option for patients, who experienced BCG-failure or BCG-intolerance and could potentially postpone or avoid radical cystectomy.

Safety and efficacy of intravesical chemotherapy and hyperthermia in the bladder: results of a porcine study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermia (heating to 43 °C) activates the innate immune system and improves bladder cancer chemosensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tissue penetration and safety of convective hyperthermia combined with intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) pharmacokinetics in live porcine bladder models using the Combat bladder recirculation system (BRS). METHODS: Forty 60 kg-female swine were anesthetized and catheterized with a 3-way, 16 F catheter. The Combat device was used to heat the bladders to a target temperature of 43 °C with recirculating intravesical MMC at doses of 40, 80, and 120 mg. Dwell-heat time varied from 30-180 min. Rapid necropsy with immediate flash freezing of tissues, blood and urine occurred. MMC concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The Combat BRS system was able to achieve target range temperature (42-44 °C) in 12 mins, and this temperature was maintained as long as the device was running. Two factors increased tissue penetration of MMC in the bladder: drug concentration, and the presence of heat. In the hyperthermia arm, MMC penetration saturated at 80 mg, suggesting that with heating, drug absorption may saturate and not require higher doses to achieve the maximal biological effect. Convective hyperthermia did not increase the MMC concentration in the liver, heart, kidney, spleen, lung, and lymph node tissue even at the 120 mg dose. CONCLUSIONS: Convective bladder hyperthermia using the Combat BRS device is safe and the temperature can be maintained at 43 °C. Hyperthermia therapy may increase MMC penetration into the bladder wall but does not result in an increase of MMC levels in other organs.

Heated Intravesical Chemotherapy: Biology and Clinical Utility.

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be a challenging disease to manage. In recent years, hyperthermia therapy in conjunction with intravesical therapy has been gaining traction as a treatment option for bladder cancer, especially if Bacillus Calmette-Guerin might not be available. Trials of intravesical chemotherapy with heat are few and there has been considerable heterogeneity between studies. However, multiple new trials have accrued and high-quality data are forthcoming. In this review, we discuss the role of combined intravesical hyperthermia and chemotherapy as a novel approach for the treatment of bladder cancer.