Uso de los test viscoelásticos en los principales escenarios clínicos de sangrado en los centros españoles / Use of viscoelastic tests in the principle bleeding scenarios in Spanish hospitals

Los test viscoelásticos son tecnologías diseñadas para estudiar la dinámica de formación del coágulo, identificar coagulopatías en tiempo real, realizar un diagnóstico y guiar el tratamiento hemostático de forma específica. Sus principales aplicaciones son el tratamiento de la hemorragia significativa en cualquier escenario, así como el de otras situaciones que cursen con alteraciones clínicamente relevantes de la hemostasia, como la coagulopatía del paciente crítico. Su uso se establece mediante algoritmos basados en la evidencia científica que están sujetos a variabilidad en función del contexto clínico. Basada en una encuesta distribuida en varios hospitales, esta revisión objetiva el grado de extensión y la homogeneidad en el uso de los test viscoelásticos en nuestro medio en cirugía cardiaca, en el trasplante hepático y en el paciente politraumatizado. Los resultados obtenidos revelan disparidad en aspectos clave que van desde su capacidad diagnóstica propiamente dicha hasta la interpretación de los parámetros básicos. Estos hallazgos permiten plantear potenciales áreas de investigación con el objetivo de mejorar su rendimiento.(AU)

Viscoelastic tests are designed to study the dynamics of clot formation, identify coagulopathies in real time, arrive at a diagnosis, and guide patient-specific administration of haemostatics. They are mainly used to treat clinically significant bleeding in any setting, and are also used in other situations involving clinically relevant alterations in haemostasis, such as coagulopathy in critically ill patients. These tests are administered following evidence-based algorithms that vary depending on the clinical context. This review summarises the results of a survey conducted in several hospitals to determine the prevalence and standardisation of viscoelastic tests in cardiac surgery, liver transplantation, and multiple trauma patients in Spain. The results reveal divergent opinions on key aspects, ranging from the diagnostic capacity of these tests to the interpretation of the basic parameters. On the basis of these findings, we propose a number of potential areas in which further research will improve the performance of these tests.(AU)

Use of viscoelastic tests in the principle bleeding scenarios in Spanish hospitals.

Viscoelastic tests are designed to study the dynamics of clot formation, identify coagulopathies in real time, arrive at a diagnosis, and guide patient-specific administration of haemostatics. They are mainly used to treat clinically significant bleeding in any setting, and are also used in other situations involving clinically relevant alterations in haemostasis, such as coagulopathy in critically ill patients. These tests are administered following evidence-based algorithms that vary depending on the clinical context. This review summarises the results of a survey conducted in several hospitals to determine the prevalence and standardisation of viscoelastic tests in cardiac surgery, liver transplantation, and multiple trauma patients in Spain. The results reveal divergent opinions on key aspects, ranging from the diagnostic capacity of these tests to the interpretation of the basic parameters. On the basis of these findings, we propose a number of potential areas in which further research will improve the performance of these tests.

Preoperative coagulation screening tests in pediatric patients: Clinical relevance and hemorrhagic outcomes of abnormal results.

PURPOSE: Coagulation screening tests in children are still frequently performed in many countries to evaluate bleeding risk. The aim of this study was to assess the management of unexpected prolongations of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombine time (PT) in children prior to elective surgery, and the perioperative hemorrhagic outcomes. METHODS: Children with prolonged APTT and/or PT who attended a preoperative anesthesia consultation from January 2013 to December 2018 were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they were referred to a Hematologist or were scheduled to undergo surgery without further investigation. The primary endpoint was to compare perioperative bleeding complications. RESULTS: 1835 children were screened for eligibility. 102 presented abnormal results (5.6%). Of them, 45% were referred to a Hematologist. Significant bleeding disorders were associated with a positive bleeding history, odds ratio of 51 (95% CI 4.8-538.5, P=.0011). No difference in perioperative hemorrhagic outcomes were found between the groups. An additional cost of 181 euros per patient and a preoperative median delay of 43 days was observed in patients referred to Hematology. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that hematology referral has limited value in asymptomatic children with a prolonged APTT and/or PT. Hemorrhagic complications were similar among patients referred and not referred to Hematology. A positive personal or family bleeding history can help identify patients with a higher bleeding risk, thus it should guide the need for coagulation testing and hematology referral. Further efforts should be made to standardize preoperative bleeding assessments tools in children.

Pruebas de coagulación preoperatorias en pacientes pediátricos: relevancia clínica y consecuencias hemorrágicas de los resultados anómalos / Preoperative coagulation screening tests in pediatric patients: Clinical relevance and hemorrhagic outcomes of abnormal results

Objetivo: Las pruebas de evaluación de la coagulación en niños siguen realizándose con frecuencia en muchos países, para evaluar el riesgo de hemorragia. El objetivo de este estudio fue valorar el manejo de la prolongación inesperada del tiempo de tromboplastina parcial activada (APTT) y el tiempo de protrombina (PT) en niños previa a la cirugía electiva, y el riesgo hemorrágico perioperatorio. Métodos: Se incluyó a los niños con APTT y/o PT prolongados que acudieron a consulta de anestesia preoperatoria desde enero del 2013 a diciembre del 2018. Se agrupó a los pacientes en función de si habían sido derivados a Hematología o habían sido programados para cirugía sin pruebas adicionales. El resultado primario fue comparar las complicaciones hemorrágicas perioperatorias. Resultados: Se evaluó para elegibilidad a 1.835 niños. Presentaron resultados anormales 102 de ellos (5,6%) y el 45% fue derivado a Hematología previo a la cirugía. Los trastornos hemorrágicos significativos estuvieron asociados a a una historia hemorrágica (personal y/o familiar) positiva, odds ratio de 51 (IC 95% de 4,8 a 538,5, p = 0,0011). No se encontró diferencia en términos de resultados de hemorragia perioperatoria entre los grupos. Se observó un coste adicional de 181 € por paciente y una mediana de demora preoperatoria de 43 días en los pacientes derivados a Hematología. Conclusiones: Nuestros resultados sugieren que la derivación a Hematología tiene un valor limitado en niños asintomáticos con APTT y/o PT prolongados. Las complicaciones hemorrágicas fueron similares entre los pacientes derivados y los no derivados a Hematología. Una historia familiar positiva de hemorragia puede ayudar a identificar a los pacientes con mayor riesgo de sangrado, por lo que debería guiar la petición de los análisis de coagulación y la derivación a Hematología. Esfuerzos adicionales son necesarios para estandarizar las herramientas preoperatorias de evaluación hemorrágica en niños.(AU)

Purpose: Coagulation screening tests in children are still frequently performed in many countries to evaluate bleeding risk. The aim of this study was to assess the management of unexpected prolongations of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombine time (PT) in children prior to elective surgery, and the perioperative hemorrhagic outcomes. Methods: Children with prolonged APTT and/or PT who attended a preoperative anesthesia consultation from January 2013 to December 2018 were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they were referred to a Hematologist or were scheduled to undergo surgery without further investigation. The primary endpoint was to compare perioperative bleeding complications. Results: 1835 children were screened for eligibility. 102 presented abnormal results (5.6%). Of them, 45% were referred to a Hematologist. Significant bleeding disorders were associated with a positive bleeding history, odds ratio of 51 (95% CI 4.8 to 538.5, P = 0.0011). No difference in perioperative hemorrhagic outcomes were found between the groups. An additional cost of 181 euros per patient and a preoperative median delay of 43 days was observed in patients referred to Hematology. Conclusions: Our results suggest that hematology referral has limited value in asymptomatic children with a prolonged APTT and/or PT. Hemorrhagic complications were similar among patients referred and not referred to Hematology. A positive personal or family bleeding history can help identify patients with a higher bleeding risk, thus it should guide the need for coagulation testing and hematology referral. Further efforts should be made to standardize preoperative bleeding assessments tools in children.(AU)