Análise das prescrições de pacientes com covid-19 em uso de hidroxicloroquina em uma unidade de terapia intensiva / Analysis of prescriptions of patients with COVID-19 using hydroxychloroquine in an Intensive Care Unit / Análisis de las prescripciones de pacientes con COVID-19 en uso hidroxicloroquina en una unidad de terapia intensiva

Mesmo em emergências sanitárias, quando terapias experimentais são empregadas, é importante prezar pela segurança e eficácia no uso de medicamentos, e a análise de prescrições médicas é uma das maneiras de monitorar aspectos de segurança. Objetivo: Quantificar e classificar as interações medicamentosas potenciais com hidroxicloroquina de acordo com o riscoem prescrições de pacientes com COVID-19 em pacientes com COVID-19 em uso de hidroxicloroquina admitidos em uma unidade de terapia intensiva de um Hospital de Ensino.Metodologia:Este estudo transversal baseou-se na análise de 162 prescrições de 38 pacientes admitidos em uma unidade de terapia intensiva de um Hospital de ensino entre abril e junho de 2020.O Micromedex® e o UpToDate® foram as bases de dados de apoio à conduta clínica utilizadas para estabelecer as interações medicamentosas potenciais. Resultados:A média de dias de internamento foi de 16,1 ± 14,0 e a média de dias em uso de hidroxicloroquina foi de 4,26 ± 1,74. 87,14% das prescrições apresentaram interações medicamentosas potenciais e a mais comum foi entre hidroxicloroquina e azitromicina. 76,4% das prescrições analisadas apresentaram interações medicamentosas potenciais com hidroxicloroquina. 73,5% das prescrições tiverampelo menos uma interação medicamentosa potencial entre medicamentos que prolongam o intervalo QT. Conclusões: Tendo em vista os riscos da exposição de pacientes críticos às interações medicamentosas, este estudo demonstra a necessidade de fortalecer nas instituições hospitalares a cultura de monitoramento de parâmetros de segurança e eficáciano uso de medicamentos, inclusive em terapias experimentais com a utilização de medicamentos off-labelpara minimizar riscos e ampliar possíveis benefícios (AU).

Even in health emergencies, when experimental therapies are employed, it is important to ensure the safety and efficacy of medicines, and the analysis of medical prescriptions is one of the ways to monitor safety aspects.Objective: Quantify and rank potential drug interactions with hydroxychloroquine according to risk in prescriptions of COVID-19 patients taking hydroxychloroquine admitted to an intensive care unit of a TeachingHospital.Methodology: This cross-sectional study was based on the analysis of 162 prescriptions of 38 patients admitted to an intensive care unit of a teaching hospital between April and June 2020. Micromedex® and UpToDate® were the clinical practice support databases used to establish potential drug interactions. Results: The mean number of days of hospitalization was 16.1 ± 14.0 and the mean number of days of days on hydroxychloroquine was 4.26 ± 1.74. 87.14% of the prescriptions presented potential drug interactions and the most common was between hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. 76.4% of the analyzed prescriptions had potential drug interactions with hydroxychloroquine. 73.5% of prescriptions had at least one potential drug interaction between drugs that prolong the QT interval. Conclusions: In view of the risks of exposure of critically ill patients to drug interactions, this study interactions, this study demonstrates the need to strengthen in hospital institutions the culture of institutions the culture of monitoring safety and efficacy parameters in the use of medicines, including experimental therapies with the use of off-label drugs to minimize risks and increase possible benefits (AU).

Aunque en médio aemergencias sanitarias, cuando son empleadas terapias experimentales, es importante estimar la seguridad y eficacia en el uso de los medicamentos, y el análisis de prescripciones es una de las formas de acompanhar los aspectos de seguridad. Objetivo:Cuantificar y clasificar las interaciones farmacologicas potenciales con hidroxicloroquina de acuerdo com el riesgo em prescripciones de pacientes com Covid-19 em uso de hidroxicloroquina andmitidos em unidad de terapia intensiva de um Hospital Docente. Metodología: Este estudio transversal se asienta en el análisis de 162 prescripciones de 38 pacientes admitidos em uma unidad de terapia intensiva de um Hospital Docente entre abril y junio de 2020. El Micromedex®ï¸y el UpToDate®ï¸fueron las bases de datos de apoyo a la actuación clínica utilizadas para establecer las interacciones farmacológicas potenciales. Resultados:El promedio de días de internamiento fue de 16,1 ± 14,0 y el promedio de días en uso hidroxicloroquina fuede 4,26 ± 1,74. 87,14% de las prescripciones presentaron interacciones farmacológicas potenciales y la más común fue entre hidroxicloroquina y azitromicina. 76,4% de las prescripciones analizadas presentaron interaciones farmacológicas com hidroxicloroquina. 73,5% de las prescripciones tuvierion por lo menos uma interacción farmacológica potencial entre medicamentos que prolongam el intervalo QT. Conclusiones:Tenendo a la vista los riesgos de la exposición de pacientes críticos a las interaciones farmacológicas, este estudio demuestra la necesidad de reforzar em las instituiciones hospitalarias la cultura de monitoreo de parâmetros de seguridade y eficacio em el uso de medicamentos, incluso en terapias experimentales con utilización de medicamentos off-label, para minorar riesgos y ampliar los posibles beneficios (AU).

Atrial fibrillation and QT prolongation after a single dose of hydroxychloroquine / Fibrilación auricular y prolongación del QT después de una dosis única de hidroxicloroquina

Non-antiarrhythmic drugs may induce QT-prolongation and increase the risk of arrhythmias. Recent studies have determined that there is a risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) due to QT prolongation. We report a case of FA associated to QT prolongation secondary to a single dose of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in an 83-years-old polymedicated patient admitted to our hospital due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Quetiapine was prescribed as regular medicine after admission and a 5-days oral HCQ regimen was started for COVID-19. Thirty minutes after HCQ loading dose, FA was reported on electrocardiogram (EKG). COVID-19 treatment is leading to use off-label drugs that may generate adverse effects. It should be considered that drugs that induce QT prolongation may be triggers for atrial arrhythmias. There is not any report of sudden onset of increased QT interval with associated arrythmia after a single dose of HCQ, even in a short course treatment. (AU)

Los fármacos no antiarrítmicos pueden inducir la prolongación del intervalo QT y aumentar el riesgo de arritmias. Estudios recientes han determinado que existe riesgo de desarrollar fibrilación auricular (FA) asociada a la prolongación del intervalo QT. Presentamos un caso de FA asociado a prolongación del QT secundario a una dosis única de hidroxicloroquina (HCQ) en una paciente polimedicada de 83 años ingresada en nuestro hospital por infección por SARS-CoV-2. A la paciente se le prescribió quetiapina como parte de su medicamento habitual al ingreso y se inició tratamiento frente a COVID-19 basado en HCQ oral. Treinta minutos tras la dosis de carga de HCQ, se informó FA en el electrocardiograma (ECG). El tratamiento de COVID-19 está llevando al uso de medicamentos no aprobados que pueden generar efectos adversos. Además, debe considerarse que los fármacos que inducen la prolongación del QT pueden desencadenar arritmias auriculares. No se han reportado casos de aparición repentina de aumento del intervalo QT con arritmia asociada después de una dosis única de HCQ. (AU)

Caracterización de eventos adversos a hidroxicloroquina, ivermectina, azitromicina y tocilizumab en pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 en un hospital del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú / Characterization of adverse events to hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin and tocilizumab in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in a Peruvian Social Health Insurance hospital

Objetivos. Caracterizar los eventos adversos (EA) asociados a hidroxicloroquina (HQ), azitromicina (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) e ivermectina (IVM) prescritos como «fuera de etiqueta» en el tratamiento de pacientes hospitalizados por la COVID-19. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un análisis secundario transversal de la base de datos del sistema de farmacovigilancia del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú (EsSalud) de las notificaciones de EA a HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM provenientes del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de abril a octubre del 2020. Se revisaron las historias clínicas digitales, se estimaron las tasas de reporte de EA y se evaluaron sus características por tipo de fármaco, tiempo de aparición, tipo por órgano-sistema afectado, gravedad y causalidad. Resultados. Se identificaron 154 notificaciones que describen un total de 183 EA posiblemente relacionados con HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM, siendo 8% la tasa de reporte de EA. La mediana de tiempo de aparición de EA fue de 3 días (RIC: 2-5). La mayoría fueron cardiovasculares, destacándose la prolongación del intervalo QT. Se observaron EA hepatobiliares principalmente asociados a TOB. La mayoría de los casos fueron moderados, no obstante, el 10,4% fue grave. Conclusiones. Se identificaron EA potencialmente asociados al uso de HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM contra la COVID-19, siendo los más frecuentes los de tipo cardiovasculares. A pesar de que la AZI, HQ e IVM poseen perfiles conocidos de seguridad, su empleo en la COVID-19 podría incrementar la aparición de EA por los factores de riesgo propios de esta infección. Se sugiere reforzar la vigilancia, especialmente, de TOB.

Objective. To characterize the adverse events (AEs) related to the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine (HQ), azithromycin (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) and ivermectin (IVM) for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. Materials and Methods. We conducted a secondary cross-sectional analysis of the Peruvian Social Health Insurance (EsSalud) pharmacovigilance system database of AE notifications to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM in the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital from April to October 2020. Information was collected from digital medical records. We estimated AE reporting rates and evaluated their characteristics by drug type, time of occurrence, type by the affected organ-system, severity and causality. Results. We identified 154 notifications describing a total of 183 AE possibly related to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM; the reporting rate was 8%. The median time of AE occurrence was 3 days (IQR: 2-5). Most were cardiovascular events; prolongation of the QT interval was the most frequent. Hepatobiliary AEs were mainly associated with TOB. Most cases were moderate, however, 10.4% were severe. Conclusions. We found AEs potentially associated with the use of HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM against COVID-19; cardiovascular events were the most frequent. Although AZI, HQ and IVM have known safety profiles, their use against COVID-19 could increase the occurrence of AE due to the risk factors inherent to this infection. Surveillance systems must be improved, especially those for TOB.

Hidroxicloroquina para Pacientes com COVID-19 não Hospitalizados: Uma Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise de Ensaios Clínicos Randomizados / Hydroxychloroquine for Non-Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Resumo Fundamento: Revisões sistemáticas anteriores não identificaram benefício do uso da hidroxicloroquina ou da cloroquina em pacientes com COVID-19 não hospitalizados. Após a publicação dessas revisões, os resultados do COPE, o maior ensaio clínico randomizado até hoje, tornaram-se disponíveis. Objetivos: Conduzir uma revisão sistemática e metanálise de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) para sintetizar as evidências sobre a eficácia e a segurança da hidroxicloroquina e da cloroquina em pacientes com COVID-19 não hospitalizados em comparação a controle ou tratamento padrão. Métodos: As buscas foram conduzidas nos bancos de dados PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library e ClinicalTrials.gov, e complementadas por busca manual. Foram realizadas metanálises diretas e avaliações de risco de viés e certeza da evidência, incluindo análise do tamanho ótimo da informação (OIS, optimal information size). Um nível de significância de 0,05 foi adotado na metanálise. PROSPERO: CRD42021265427. Resultados: Oito ECRs com 3219 participantes foram incluídos. As taxas de internação por COVID-19 e de eventos adversos não foram significativamente diferentes entre hidroxicloroquina (5,6% e 5,1%) e controle (7,4% e 20,4%) [risco relativo (RR) 0,77, intervalo de confiança 95% (IC95%), 0,57-1,04, I2: 0%; RR 1,78, IC95% 0,90; 3,52, I2: 93%, respectivamente)]. O OIS (7880) não foi alcançado para hospitalização por COVID-19, independentemente da simulação para a taxa de evento e redução do RR estimados. Conclusão: A evidência de muito baixa qualidade indicou falta de benefício com hidroxicloroquina em prevenir internações por COVID-19. Apesar de ser a revisão sistemática com o maior número de participantes incluídos, o OIS, considerando a resposta à infecção anterior à vacinação, não foi atingido.

Abstract Background: Previous systematic reviews have identified no benefit of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. After publication of these reviews, the results of COPE, the largest randomized trial conducted to date, became available. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to synthesize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to placebo or standard of care. Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov complemented by manual search. Pairwise meta-analyses, risk of bias, and evidence certainty assessments were conducted, including optimal information size analysis (OIS). A level of significance of 0.05 was adopted in the meta-analysis. PROSPERO: CRD42021265427. Results: Eight RCTs with 3,219 participants were included. COVID-19 hospitalization and any adverse events rates were not significantly different between hydroxychloroquine (5.6% and 35.1%) and control (7.4% and 20.4%) (risk ratio, RR, 0.77, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.57-1.04, I2: 0%; RR 1.78, 95%-CI 0.90; 3.52, I2: 93%, respectively). The OIS (7,880) was not reached for COVID-19 hospitalization, independently of the simulation for anticipated event rate and RR reduction estimate. Conclusion: Evidence of very low certainty showed lack of benefit with hydroxychloroquine in preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations. Despite being the systematic review with the largest number of participants included, the OIS, considering pre-vaccination response to infection, has not yet been reached.

Dados de Vida Real sobre o Uso da Hidroxicloroquina ou da Cloroquina Combinadas ou Não à Azitromicina em Pacientes com Covid-19: Uma Análise Retrospectiva no Brasil / Real-Life Data on Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine with or Without Azithromycin in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis in Brazil

Resumo Fundamento Apesar da ausência de evidência mostrando benefícios da hidroxicloroquina e da cloroquina combinadas ou não à azitromicina no tratamento da covid-19, esses medicamentos têm sido amplamente prescritos no Brasil. Objetivos Avaliar desfechos, incluindo moralidade hospitalar, alterações eletrocardiográficas, tempo de internação, admissão na unidade de terapia intensiva, e necessidade de diálise e de ventilação mecânica em pacientes hospitalizados com covid-19 que receberam cloroquina ou hidroxicloroquina, e comparar os desfechos entre aqueles pacientes e seus controles pareados. Métodos Estudo multicêntrico retrospectivo do tipo coorte que incluiu pacientes com diagnóstico laboratorial de covid-19 de 37 hospitais no Brasil de março a setembro de 2020. Escore de propensão foi usado para selecionar controles pareados quanto a idade, sexo, comorbidades cardiovasculares, e uso de corticosteroides durante a internação. Um valor de p<0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados Dos 7850 pacientes com covid-19, 673 (8,6%) receberam hidroxicloroquina e 67 (0,9%) cloroquina. A idade mediana no grupo de estudo foi 60 (46-71) anos e 59,1% eram mulheres. Durante a internação, 3,2% dos pacientes apresentaram efeitos adversos e 2,2% necessitaram de interromper o tratamento. Alterações eletrocardiográficas foram mais prevalentes no grupo hidroxicloroquina/cloroquina (13,2% vs. 8,2%, p=0,01), e o prolongamento do intervalo QT corrigido foi a principal diferença (3,6% vs. 0,4%, p<0,001). O tempo mediano de internação hospitalar foi maior no grupo usando CQ/HCQ em relação aos controles (9,0 [5,0-18,0] vs. 8,0 [4,0-14,0] dias). Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os grupos quanto a admissão na unidade de terapia intensiva (35,1% vs. 32,0%; p=0,282), ventilação mecânica invasiva (27,0% vs. 22,3%; p=0,074) ou mortalidade (18,9% vs. 18,0%; p=0,682). Conclusão Pacientes com covid-19 tratados com cloroquina ou hidroxicloroquina apresentaram maior tempo de internação hospitalar, em comparação aos controles. Não houve diferença em relação a admissão em unidade de terapia intensiva, necessidade de ventilação mecânica e mortalidade hospitalar.

Abstract Background Despite no evidence showing benefits of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine with or without azithromycin for COVID-19 treatment, these medications have been largely prescribed in Brazil. Objectives To assess outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, electrocardiographic abnormalities, hospital length-of-stay, admission to the intensive care unit, and need for dialysis and mechanical ventilation, in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, and to compare outcomes between those patients and their matched controls. Methods A retrospective multicenter cohort study that included consecutive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients from 37 Brazilian hospitals from March to September 2020. Propensity score was used to select matching controls by age, sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, and in-hospital use of corticosteroid. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results From 7,850 COVID-19 patients, 673 (8.6%) received hydroxychloroquine and 67 (0.9%) chloroquine. The median age in the study group was 60 years (46 - 71) and 59.1% were women. During hospitalization, 3.2% of patients presented side effects and 2.2% required therapy discontinuation. Electrocardiographic abnormalities were more prevalent in the chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine group (13.2% vs. 8.2%, p=0.01), and the long corrected QT interval was the main difference (3.6% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001). The median hospital length of stay was longer in the HCQ/CQ + AZT group than in controls (9.0 [5.0, 18.0] vs. 8.0 [4.0, 14.0] days). There was no statistical differences between groups in intensive care unit admission (35.1% vs. 32.0%; p=0.282), invasive mechanical ventilation support (27.0% vs. 22.3%; p=0.074) or mortality (18.9% vs. 18.0%; p=0.682). Conclusion COVID-19 patients treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine had a longer hospital length of stay, when compared to matched controls. Intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, dialysis and in-hospital mortality were similar.

Tratamiento de COVID-19 en Panamá. La historia del inicio, estudio PanaCovid2020

Antecedentes En Panamá, durante los primeros cinco meses de pandemia, se reportaron 65,256 casos y 1,421 fallecimientos por COVID-19. Los tratamientos utilizados en pacientes hospitalizados durante este periodo fueron variando en la medida que surgía evidencia científica. Metodología Presentamos un estudio multicéntrico observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal y retrospectivo de la terapéutica administrada en pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 en siete centros estatales de la República de Panamá, entre el 1 de marzo al 31 de julio de 2020. Se analizó el resultado de recuperado o fallecido en relación al uso de hidroxicloroquina, heparinas y esteroides. Resultados Se revisaron 837 expedientes. 60.7% pacientes eran hombres y la mediana de edad fue 53.6 años. Los tratamientos más utilizados fueron heparinas 84.7%, esteroides sistémicos 76.5%, azitromicina 65.5% e hidroxicloroquina en 41.1%. La frecuencia de uso de oxigenoterapia fue de cánula nasal 73,2%, máscara facial con reservorio 39%, cánula de alto flujo 8.9%, ventilación mecánica no invasiva 11.1% y ventilación invasiva en el 15.3%. Los esteroides mostraron mayor tasa de recuperación (OR 1.72 [1.16-2.54). Conclusiones El reto de abordar una nueva enfermedad, sin tratamiento conocido, con evolución y desenlace variable, llevó a la comunidad médica a utilizar medicamentos empíricos con potencial terapéutico incierto. Destacamos que desde muy temprano se administró esteroides sistémicos, heparinas y tocilizumab; actualmente con beneficios para pacientes con requerimientos de hospitalización. Además, se empleó técnicas de oxigenación, como la cánula de alto flujo y ventilación mecánica no invasiva, con dudosa efectividad; pero que hoy ya tienen un rol estudiado en la falla respiratoria por COVID-19. (provisto por Infomedic International)

Background: In Panama, during the first five months of the pandemic, 65,256 cases and 1,421 deaths due to COVID-19 were reported. The treatments used in hospitalized patients during this period varied as scientific evidence emerged. Methodology: We present a retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, descriptive, multicenter study of the therapeutics administered in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in seven state centers in the Republic of Panama, between March 1 and July 31, 2020. The outcome of recovered or deceased was analyzed in relation to the use of hydroxychloroquine, heparins and steroids. Results: A total of 837 files were reviewed. 60.7% of patients were men and the median age was 53.6 years. The most commonly used treatments were heparins 84.7%, systemic steroids 76.5%, azithromycin 65.5% and hydroxychloroquine in 41.1%. The frequency of oxygen therapy use was nasal cannula 73.2%, face mask with reservoir 39%, high-flow cannula 8.9%, noninvasive mechanical ventilation 11.1% and invasive ventilation in 15.3%. Steroids showed higher recovery rate (OR 1.72 [1.16-2.54). Conclusions: The challenge of dealing with a new disease, without known treatment, with variable evolution and outcome, led the medical community to use empirical drugs with uncertain therapeutic potential. We highlight the early administration of systemic steroids, heparins and tocilizumab; currently with benefits for patients requiring hospitalization. In addition, oxygenation techniques were used, such as high-flow cannula and noninvasive mechanical ventilation, with doubtful effectiveness, but which today have a studied role in respiratory failure due to COVID-19.   (provided by Infomedic International)

Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in healthcare professionals with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection: Prospective, non-randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) compared with no treatment in healthcare workers with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Prospective, non-randomized study. All health professionals with confirmed COVID-19 between April 7 and May 6, 2020, non-requiring initial hospitalization were asked to participate. Patients who accepted treatment were given HCQ for five days (loading dose of 400mg q12h the first day followed by200mg q12h). Control group included patients with contraindications for HCQ or who rejected treatment. Study outcomes were negative conversion and viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, symptoms duration and disease progression. RESULT: Overall, 142 patients were enrolled: 87 in treatment group and 55 in control group. The median age was 37 years and 75% were female, with few comorbidities. There were no significant differences in time to negative conversion of PCR between both groups. The only significant difference in the probability of negative conversion of PCR was observed at day 21 (18.7%, 95%CI 2.0-35.4). The decrease of SARS-CoV-2 viral load during follow-up was similar in both groups. A non significant reduction in duration of some symptoms in HCQ group was observed. Two patients with HCQ and 4 without treatment developed pneumonia. No patients required admission to the Intensive Care Unit or died. About 50% of patients presented mild side effects of HCQ, mainly diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Our study failed to show a substantial benefit of HCQ in viral dynamics and in resolution of clinical symptoms in health care workers with mild COVID-19.

Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in healthcare professionals with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection: Prospective, non-randomized trial / Eficacia y seguridad de hidroxicloroquina en profesionales sanitarios con infección leve por SARS-CoV-2: Estudio prospectivo y no aleatorio

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) compared with no treatment in healthcare workers with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Prospective, non-randomized study. All health professionals with confirmed COVID-19 between April 7 and May 6, 2020, non-requiring initial hospitalization were asked to participate. Patients who accepted treatment were given HCQ for five days (loading dose of 400mg q12h the first day followed by200mg q12h). Control group included patients with contraindications for HCQ or who rejected treatment. Study outcomes were negative conversion and viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, symptoms duration and disease progression. Result: Overall, 142 patients were enrolled: 87 in treatment group and 55 in control group. The median age was 37 years and 75% were female, with few comorbidities. There were no significant differences in time to negative conversion of PCR between both groups. The only significant difference in the probability of negative conversion of PCR was observed at day 21 (18.7%, 95%CI 2.0–35.4). The decrease of SARS-CoV-2 viral load during follow-up was similar in both groups. A non significant reduction in duration of some symptoms in HCQ group was observed. Two patients with HCQ and 4 without treatment developed pneumonia. No patients required admission to the Intensive Care Unit or died. About 50% of patients presented mild side effects of HCQ, mainly diarrhea. Conclusions: Our study failed to show a substantial benefit of HCQ in viral dynamics and in resolution of clinical symptoms in health care workers with mild COVID-19.(AU)

Objetivos: Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de hidroxicloroquina (HCQ), en comparación con la ausencia de tratamiento en los profesionales sanitarios con infección leve por SARS-CoV-2. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo y no aleatorio. Se solicitó su participación a todos los profesionales sanitarios con diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19, entre el 7 de abril y el 6 de mayo de 2020, que no requirieron hospitalización inicial. Los pacientes que aceptaron el tratamiento recibieron HCQ durante cinco días (dosis de carga de 400 mg cada 12 h el primer día, y a continuación 200 mg cada 12 h). El grupo control incluyó pacientes con contraindicaciones de HCQ, o que rechazaron el tratamiento. Los resultados del estudio fueron conversión negativa y dinámica viral de SARS-CoV-2, duración de los síntomas y progresión de la enfermedad. Resultados: En total se incluyeron 142 pacientes: 87 en el grupo de tratamiento, y 55 en el grupo control. La edad media fue de 37 años, y el 75% fueron mujeres, con pocas comorbilidades. No existieron diferencias significativas en cuanto al tiempo transcurrido hasta la conversión negativa de la PCR entre ambos grupos. La única diferencia significativa en cuanto a la probabilidad de negativización de la PCR se observó el día 21 (18,7%, IC 95% 2-35,4). El descenso de la carga viral de SARS-CoV-2 durante el seguimiento fue similar en ambos grupos. Se observó una reducción no significativa de la duración de algunos síntomas en el grupo HCQ. Dos pacientes con HCQ y cuatro sin tratamiento desarrollaron neumonía. Ningún paciente requirió ingreso en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, ni hubo fallecidos. Cerca del 50% de los pacientes presentó efectos secundarios leves de HCQ, principalmente diarrea. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio no reflejó un beneficio sustancial de HCQ, en cuanto a dinámica viral y resolución de los síntomas clínicos en los profesionales sanitarios con infección leve por COVID-19.(AU)

Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: an opinion paper / Tratamiento farmacológico del COVID-19: un documento de opinión

The precocity and efficacy of the vaccines developed so far against COVID-19 has been the most significant and saving advance against the pandemic. The development of vaccines has not prevented, during the whole period of the pandemic, the constant search for therapeutic medicines, both among existing drugs with different indications and in the development of new drugs. The Scientific Committee of the COVID-19 of the Illustrious College of Physicians of Madrid wanted to offer an early, simplified and critical approach to these new drugs, to new developments in immunotherapy and to what has been learned from the immune response modulators already known and which have proven effective against the virus, in order to help understand the current situation. (AU)

La precocidad y la eficacia de las vacunas desarrolladas hasta ahora frente al COVID-19, ha sido el avance más significativo y salvador frente a la pandemia. El desarrollo vacunal no ha impedido, durante todo el periodo de la pandemia, la búsqueda constante de remedios terapéuticos, tanto entre los medicamentos ya existentes y con indicaciones diversas, como en el desarrollo de nuevos fármacos. Sobre estos nuevos fármacos, sobre las novedades en la inmunoterapia y sobre lo aprendido de los moduladores de la respuesta inmune ya conocidos y que se han mostrado eficaces frente al virus, el Comité Científico del COVID-19 del Ilustre Colegio de Médicos de Madrid ha querido ofrecer una aproximación precoz, simplificada y critica que pueda ayudar a comprender la situación actual. (AU)

Evolución del intervalo QTc en pacientes con infección SARS-CoV-2 tratados con fármacos antivirales / QTc interval prolongation in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and treated with antiviral drugs

Introducción: Muchos antivirales, como la hidroxicloroquina, se han utilizado para el tratamiento de COVID-19. La prolongación del QTc es un efecto adverso preocupante, escasamente estudiado en pediatría. Pacientes y métodos: Los pacientes pediátricos con COVID-19 que recibieron tratamiento antiviral se emparejaron (1:2) con controles no infectados ni expuestos al tratamiento. Se analizaron prospectivamente los electrocardiogramas basales, en las primeras 72 horas de tratamiento y posterior a 72 horas. Resultados: Once (22,9%) de 48 pacientes pediátricos ingresados por COVID-19 (marzo a julio del 2020) recibieron terapia antiviral. Todos presentaban patologías de base; destacando cardiopatías (4/11; 36,4%) e inmunosupresión (3/11; 27,3%); 5/11 (45,5%) recibían tratamiento de base con potencial efecto sobre el QTc. No hubo diferencias en el QTc basal entre casos y controles: 414,8 ms (49,2) vs. 416,5 ms (29,4) (p = 0,716). Se observó QTc prolongado basal en 2/11 casos y 2/22 controles. De los casos, 10/11 (90,9%) recibieron hidroxicloroquina, principalmente asociada a azitromicina (8/11; 72,7%); tres recibieron lopinavir/ritonavir, uno remdesivir. La mediana de incremento del QTc tras 72 horas fue de 28,9 ms (IQR 48,7) (p = 0,062); 4/11 (36,4%) presentaron un QTc largo, de los cuales en tres ≥ 500 ms. En uno se paró el tratamiento (QTc 510 ms) pero no se documentaron arritmias ventriculares. Conclusiones: El uso de fármacos antivirales causó un incremento del QTc tras 72 horas de tratamiento, considerándose un QTc largo en el 36,4% de los pacientes, aunque no se objetivaron eventos arrítmicos. El uso de hidroxicloroquina y antivirales requiere monitorización activa del QTc y se recomienda suspender el tratamiento si el QTc > 500 ms. (AU)

Introduction: Many antiviral agents, such as hydroxychloroquine, have been used to treat COVID-19, without being broadly accepted. QTc prolongation is a worrisome adverse effect, scarcely studied in pediatrics. Patients and methods: Pediatric patients affected from COVID-19 who received antivirals were matched (1:2) with controls not infected nor exposed. Electrocardiograms were prospectively analyzed at baseline, during the first 72 h in treatment and after 72 h. Results: Eleven (22.9%) out of 48 patients admitted due to COVID-19 (March–July 2020) received antiviral therapy. All had underlying diseases: congenital heart disease (4/11; 36.4%) and immunosuppression (3/11; 27.3%) stand out. 5/11 (45.5%) received treatment at baseline with a potential effect on QTc. There where no differences observed in the baseline QTc between cases and controls: 414.8 ms (49.2) vs. 416.5 ms (29.4) (p = 0.716). Baseline long QT was observed in 2/11 cases and 2/22. Among cases, 10/11 (90.9%) received hydroxychloroquine, mainly associated with azithromycin (8/11; 72.7%), 3 received lopinavir/ritonavir and one remdesivir. The median increase in QTc after 72 h under treatment was 28.9 ms (IQR 48.7) (p = 0.062). 4/11 (36.4%) patients had a long QTc at 72 h, resulting in 3 patients ≥500 ms; treatment was stopped in one (QTc 510 ms) but ventricular arrhythmias were not documented. Conclusions: The use of antivirals caused an increase on the QTc interval after 72 h of treatment, being the QTc long in 36.3% of the patients, although no arrhythmic events were observed. The use of hydroxychloroquine and antivirals requires active QTc monitoring and it is recommended to discontinue treatment if QTc >500 ms. (AU)

QTc interval prolongation in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and treated with antiviral drugs.

INTRODUCTION: Many antiviral agents, such as hydroxychloroquine, have been used to treat COVID-19, without being broadly accepted. QTc prolongation is a worrisome adverse effect, scarcely studied in pediatrics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paediatric patients affected from COVID-19 who received antivirals were matched (1:2) with controls not infected nor exposed. Electrocardiograms were prospectively analyzed at baseline, during the first 72 h of treatment and after 72 h. RESULTS: Eleven (22.9%) out of 48 patients admitted due to COVID-19 (March-July 2020) received antiviral therapy. All had underlying diseases: congenital heart disease (4/11; 36.4%) and immunosuppression (3/11; 27.3%) stand out. 5/11 (45.5%) received treatment at baseline with a potential effect on QTc. There where no differences observed in the baseline QTc between cases and controls: 414.8 ms (49.2) vs 416.5 ms (29.4), (P = .716). Baseline long QT was observed in 2/11 cases and 2/22. Among cases, 10/11 (90.9%) received hydroxychloroquine, mainly associated with azithromycin (8/11; 72.7%), 3 received lopinavir/ritonavir and one remdesivir. The median increase in QTc after 72 h under treatment was 28.9 ms [IQR 48.7] (P = .062). 4/11 (36.4%) patients had a long QTc at 72 h, resulting in 3 patients ≥500 ms; treatment was stopped in one (QTc 510 ms) but ventricular arrhythmias were not documented. CONCLUSIONS: The use of antivirals caused an increase on the QTc interval after 72 h of treatment, being the QTc long in 36.3% of the patients, although no arrhythmic events were observed. The use of hydroxychloroquine and antivirals requires active QTc monitoring and it is recommended to discontinue treatment if QTc > 500 ms.

La hidroxicloroquina como fármaco fundamental en dermatología y su papel controvertido en la COVID-19 / Hydroxychloroquine: An Essential Drug in Dermatology and Its Controversial Use in COVID-19

La hidroxicloroquina es un antimalárico con acción inmunomoduladora, antiinflamatoria, antibacteriana y antiviral. Posee un buen perfil de seguridad y puede ser utilizada en niños, en mujeres embarazadas o durante la lactancia, y no produce inmunosupresión. La retinopatía es uno de sus efectos adversos más temidos y requiere controles regulares. La hidroxicloroquina es un fármaco esencial en dermatología, utilizado ampliamente con buenas tasas de respuesta clínica tanto como un tratamiento de primera línea en el lupus eritematoso, como en múltiples dermatosis autoinmunes/inflamatorias como liquen plano, erupción polimorfa lumínica, porfiria cutánea tarda, granuloma anular y sarcoidosis, entre otras. Durante el año 2020 fue prescrita a gran escala como profilaxis y tratamiento de la infección producida por el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). El aumento de la utilización de hidroxicloroquina produjo serias dificultades para su obtención e incluso desabastecimiento. En metaanálisis recientes se ha concluido que la hidroxicloroquina no es efectiva para el tratamiento de esta patología y se desaconseja su prescripción (AU)

Hydroxychloroquine is an antimalarial drug with immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antiviral properties. It has a good safety profile, can be used in children and in pregnant and breastfeeding women, and does not suppress the immune system. Regular screening for retinopathy, one of the drug's most feared adverse effects, is necessary. Hydroxychloroquine is a widely used, essential drug in dermatology. Clinical response rates are good in lupus erythematous, where it is a first-line therapy, as well in numerous autoimmune/inflammatory diseases, including lichen planus, polymorphic light eruption, porphyria cutanea tarda, granuloma annulare, and sarcoidosis. In 2020, it was widely prescribed both to prevent and to treat COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. Its increased use led to serious supply shortages and in some cases stocks were entirely depleted. Recent meta-analyses have concluded that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective against COVID-19 and have advised against its use (AU)

[Translated article] Hydroxychloroquine: An Essential Drug in Dermatology and Its Controversial Use in COVID-19 / La hidroxicloroquina como fármaco fundamental en dermatología y su papel controvertido en la COVID-19

Hydroxychloroquine is an antimalarial drug with immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antiviral properties. It has a good safety profile, can be used in children and in pregnant and breastfeeding women, and does not suppress the immune system. Regular screening for retinopathy, one of the drug's most feared adverse effects, is necessary. Hydroxychloroquine is a widely used, essential drug in dermatology. Clinical response rates are good in lupus erythematous, where it is a first-line therapy, as well in numerous autoimmune/inflammatory diseases, including lichen planus, polymorphic light eruption, porphyria cutanea tarda, granuloma annulare, and sarcoidosis. In 2020, it was widely prescribed both to prevent and to treat COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. Its increased use led to serious supply shortages and in some cases stocks were entirely depleted. Recent meta-analyses have concluded that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective against COVID-19 and have advised against its use (AU)

La hidroxicloroquina es un antimalárico con acción inmunomoduladora, antiinflamatoria, antibacteriana y antiviral. Posee un buen perfil de seguridad y puede ser utilizada en niños, en mujeres embarazadas o durante la lactancia, y no produce inmunosupresión. La retinopatía es uno de sus efectos adversos más temidos y requiere controles regulares. La hidroxicloroquina es un fármaco esencial en dermatología, utilizado ampliamente con buenas tasas de respuesta clínica tanto como un tratamiento de primera línea en el lupus eritematoso, como en múltiples dermatosis autoinmunes/inflamatorias como liquen plano, erupción polimorfa lumínica, porfiria cutánea tarda, granuloma anular y sarcoidosis, entre otras. Durante el año 2020 fue prescrita a gran escala como profilaxis y tratamiento de la infección producida por el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). El aumento de la utilización de hidroxicloroquina produjo serias dificultades para su obtención e incluso desabastecimiento. En metaanálisis recientes se ha concluido que la hidroxicloroquina no es efectiva para el tratamiento de esta patología y se desaconseja su prescripción (AU)

Sospechas de ideación suicida y alucinaciones atribuibles a hidroxicloroquina en el tratamiento de la enfermedad por Coronavirus-19 / Suspicion of suicides and hallucinations possibly due to hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019

Objetivo: Detectar y notificar casos de suicidios o intentos de suicidios y alucinaciones en pacientes tratados con hidroxicloroquina para la enfermedad por Coronavirus 2019.Material y método: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de todos los pacientes tratados con hidroxicloroquina en los 40 días previos al suceso y que cumplían: suicidio consumado, psicosis aguda con intento de suicidio y comportamiento psicótico y agresividad con daño a terceros. Se excluyeron pacientes con situación previa de depresión, intento o plan organizado de suicidio, abuso de alcohol, falta de pensamiento racional o carencia de apoyo social. Para establecer el grado de asociación entre la sospecha de reacción adversa e hidroxicloroquina, se utilizó el algoritmo Karch y Lasagna modificado.Resultados: Se detectaron cinco casos graves de trastornos neuropsiquiátricos posiblemente relacionados con hidroxicloroquina: suicidio consumado (tres), crisis de psicosis aguda con intento de suicidio (uno) y comportamiento psicótico y agresividad con daño a terceros (uno); los dos últimos se recuperaron tras la retirada del medicamento. Todos eran varones, con edades comprendidas entre los 26-85 años. Las reacciones adversas de tipo psiquiátrico aparecieron entre los 2-5 días tras el inicio. Ninguno tenía antecedentes psiquiátricos previos, y todos se encontraban tranquilos, colaboradores y sin síntomas depresivos durante la hospitalización.Conclusión: La evidencia en otras patologías sugiere un aumento potencial de síntomas como ansiedad, ideación suicida y alucinaciones que pueden provocar agresiones o suicidio con la exposición a hidroxicloroquina, por lo que sería necesario generar evidencia del uso de hidroxicloroquina en esta situación actual de pandemia por la COVID-19 y en condiciones diferentes a las autorizadas. (AU)

Objective: This paper aims to detect and report suicide cases or suicide attempts and hallucinations during the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019.Methods: It was a retrospective descriptive study in which patients treated with hydroxychloroquine 40 days before the event were included: completed suicide, acute psychosis with suicide attempt and psychotic behavior and aggressiveness with harm to third parties. Patients with a previous situation of depression, attempted or organized suicide plan, alcohol abuse and lack of rational thought or social support were excluded. To establish the degree of association between suspected adverse drug reaction and hydroxychloroquine, the modified version of the algorithm proposed by Karch and Lasagna was used.Results: There were five case reports neuropsychiatric adverse events associated with the use of hydroxychloroquine: completed suicide (three); acute psychosis crisis with suicide attempt (one) and psychotic behavior and aggressiveness with harm to third parties (one), which recovered after withdrawal of hydroxychloroquine. All of them were male, with age ranged between 26-85 years. Psychiatric-type adverse reactions appeared between 2-5 days after initiating therapy. None had a prior psychiatric history, and all were calm, cooperative, and without depressive symptoms during hospitalization.Conclusion: Evidence in other pathologies suggests a potential increase in symptoms such as anxiety, suicidal ideation and hallucinations that can cause aggression or suicide with exposure to hydroxychloroquine, so others studies are needed in this current situation of pandemic by COVID-19 and unapproved use of hydroxychloroquine. (AU)

Estratégias discursivas de defesa da cloroquina e da hidroxicloroquina: uma etnografia de vídeos publicados no YouTube Brasil em 2020 / Discursive strategies in defense of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: a ethnography of videos published on YouTube Brazil in 2020

O presente projeto propõe analisar estratégias argumentativas na circulação de informação envolvendo o uso de cloroquina (difosfato de cloroquina) e hidroxicloroquina (sulfato de hidroxicloroquina) para tratamento da Covid-19 no YouTube Brasil, entre os meses de março a julho de 2020, em perfis da plataforma. Os atores sociais que emergem e o contexto político social no Brasil pandêmico também nos guiam para a construção de uma linha do tempo, em uma sucessão de acontecimentos recentes envolvendo os dois medicamentos, médicos/cientistas e o Governo Federal. Nosso intento é refazer a trajetória das substâncias, os argumentos utilizados para validar a terapêutica para Covid-19 em detrimento de medidas não farmacológicas. Foi construída uma perspectiva biográfica e etnográfica para analisar as tentativas de legitimação desses medicamentos por médicos e pesquisadores durante o primeiro ano da pandemia de Covid-19, bem como foram consultados documentos oficiais do Governo Federal de modo a enriquecer o estudo. Assim, propomos uma reflexão acerca das falas proferidas por médicos e cientistas defensores do uso desses dois medicamentos, recorrendo aos programas de TV repostadas em perfis do YouTube e aos debates em lives, focalizando na análise etnográfica do conteúdo do material. AU

The present project proposes to analyze argumentative strategies in the circulation of information involving the use of chloroquine (chloroquine diphosphate) and hydroxychloroquine (hydroxychloroquine sulfate) for Covid-19 treatment on YouTube Brazil, between the months of March and July 2020, in profiles on the platform. The emerging social actors and the social political context in pandemic Brazil also guide us to construct a timeline, in a succession of recent events involving the two drugs, doctors/scientists, and the federal government. Our intent is to retrace the trajectory of the substances, the arguments used to validate the therapy for Covid-19 in detriment of non-pharmacological measures. A biographical and ethnographic perspective was built to analyze the attempts to legitimize these drugs by doctors and researchers during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as official documents from the Federal Government were consulted in order to enrich the study. Thus, we propose a reflection about the speeches given by doctors and scientists who defend the use of these two drugs, resorting to tv shows reposted in YouTube profiles and debates in lives, focusing on the ethnographic analysis of the content of the material. AU

Justificativa e Desenho do Ensaio Clínico Randomizado COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE - Coalition V): Hidroxicloroquina vs. Placebo em Pacientes Não Hospitalizados / Rationale and Design of the COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE - Coalition V) Randomized Clinical Trial: Hydroxychloroquine vs. Placebo in Non-Hospitalized Patients

Resumo Fundamento Apesar da necessidade de opções terapêuticas específicas para a doença do coronavírus 2019 (covid-19), ainda não há evidências da eficácia de tratamentos específicos no contexto ambulatorial. Há poucos estudos randomizados que avaliam a hidroxicloroquina (HCQ) em pacientes não hospitalizados. Esses estudos não indicaram benefício com o uso da HCQ; no entanto, avaliaram desfechos primários diferentes e apresentaram vieses importantes na avaliação dos desfechos. Objetivo Investigar se a HCQ possui o potencial de prevenir hospitalizações por covid-19 quando comparada ao placebo correspondente. Métodos O estudo COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE) é um ensaio clínico randomizado, pragmático, duplo-cego, multicêntrico e controlado por placebo que avalia o uso da HCQ (800 mg no dia 1 e 400 mg do dia 2 ao dia 7) ou placebo correspondente na prevenção de hospitalizações por covid-19 em casos precoces confirmados ou suspeitos de pacientes não hospitalizados. Os critérios de inclusão são adultos (≥ 18 anos) que procuraram atendimento médico com sintomas leves de covid-19, com randomização ≤ 7 dias após o início dos sintomas, sem indicação de hospitalização na triagem do estudo e com pelo menos um fator de risco para complicações (> 65 anos, hipertensão, diabetes melito, asma, doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica ou outras doenças pulmonares crônicas, tabagismo, imunossupressão ou obesidade). Todos os testes de hipótese serão bilaterais. Um valor de p < 0,05 será considerado estatisticamente significativo em todas as análises. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04466540. Resultados Os desfechos clínicos serão avaliados centralmente por um comitê de eventos clínicos independente cegado para a alocação dos grupos de tratamento. O desfecho primário de eficácia será avaliado de acordo com o princípio da intenção de tratar. Conclusão Este estudo apresenta o potencial de responder de forma confiável a questão científica do uso da HCQ em pacientes ambulatoriais com covid-19. Do nosso conhecimento, este é o maior estudo avaliando o uso de HCQ em indivíduos com covid-19 não hospitalizados.

Abstract Background Despite the need for targeting specific therapeutic options for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there has been no evidence of effectiveness of any specific treatment for the outpatient clinical setting. There are few randomized studies evaluating hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in non-hospitalized patients. These studies indicate no benefit from the use of HCQ, but they assessed different primary outcomes and presented important biases for outcome evaluation. Objective To evaluate if HCQ may prevent hospitalization due to COVID-19 compared to a matching placebo. Methods The COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE) study is a pragmatic, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of HCQ (800 mg on day 1 and 400 mg from day 2 to day 7) or matching placebo for the prevention of hospitalization due to COVID-19 in early non-hospitalized confirmed or suspected cases. Inclusion criteria are adults (≥ 18 years) seeking medical care with mild symptoms of COVID-19, with randomization ≤ 7 days after symptom onset, without indication of hospitalization at study screening, and with at least one risk factor for complication (> 65 years; hypertension; diabetes mellitus; asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other chronic lung diseases; smoking; immunosuppression; or obesity). All hypothesis tests will be two-sided. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant in all analyses. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04466540. Results Clinical outcomes will be centrally adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee blinded to the assigned treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed following the intention-to-treat principle. Conclusion This study has the potential to reliably answer the scientific question of HCQ use in outpatients with COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is the largest trial evaluating HCQ in non-hospitalized individuals with COVID-19.

Sales of "COVID kit" drugs and adverse drug reactions reported by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency / Vendas de "kit-COVID" e reações adversas a esses medicamentos relatadas pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária / Ventas de medicamentos del "kit-COVID" y reacciones adversas a los medicamentos notificadas por la Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria

Off-label use of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin (the "COVID kit") has been suggested for COVID-19 treatment in Brazil without clinical or scientific evidence of efficacy. These drugs have known adverse drug reactions (ADR). This study aimed to analyze if the sales of drugs in the "COVID kit" are correlated to the reported number of ADR after the COVID-19 pandemic began. Data was obtained from the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) website on reported sales and ADRs for azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin for all Brazilian states. The period from March 2019 to February 2020 (before the pandemic) was compared to that from March 2020 to February 2021 (during the pandemic). Trend adjustment was performed for time series data and cross-correlation analysis to investigate correlation between sales and ADR within the same month (lag 0) and in the following months (lag 1 and lag 2). Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess the magnitude of the correlations. After the pandemic onset, sales of all investigated drugs increased significantly (69.75% for azithromycin, 10,856,481.39% for hydroxychloroquine, and 12,291,129.32% for ivermectin). ADR levels of all medications but azithromycin were zero before the pandemic, but increased after its onset. Cross-correlation analysis was significant in lag 1 for all drugs nationwide. Spearman's correlation was moderate for azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine but absent for ivermectin. Data must be interpreted cautiously since no active search for ADR was performed. Our results show that the increased and indiscriminate use of "COVID kit" during the pandemic correlates to an increased occurrence of ADRs.

No Brasil, o uso off label de azitromicina, hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina (o "kit-COVID") foi sugerido para tratar COVID-19 sem que tivéssemos evidências clínicas ou científicas de sua eficácia. Estas drogas têm causado reações adversas (RA) em quem as tomam. Este estudo almejou analisar se a venda dos medicamentos que compõem o "kit-COVID" correlaciona-se com o número relatado de RAs após o início da pandemia da COVID-19. Os dados sobre vendas e RA associados a azitromicina, hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina foram obtidos no site da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) para todos os estados brasileiros. Comparamos o período entre março de 2019 e fevereiro de 2020 (antes da pandemia) ao de março de 2020 a fevereiro de 2021 (durante a pandemia). Ajustamos tendências para os dados de séries temporais e as análises de correlação cruzada para investigar a correlação entre vendas e RA em um mesmo mês (lag 0) e nos seguintes (lag 1 e 2). O coeficiente de correlação de Spearman foi utilizado para avaliar a magnitude das correlações. Após o início da pandemia, as vendas de todos os medicamentos investigados aumentaram significativamente (69,75% para azitromicina, 10.856.481,39% para hidroxicloroquina e 12.291.129,32% para ivermectina). Os níveis de RAs de todos os medicamentos (com exceção de azitromicina) eram zero antes da pandemia mas aumentaram após seu início. A análise de correlação cruzada foi significativa no lag 1 para todas as drogas em todo o país. A correlação de Spearman foi moderada para azitromicina e hidroxicloroquina, mas ausente para ivermectina. Os dados devem ser interpretados com cautela, uma vez que não realizamos uma busca ativa por RA. Nossos resultados mostram que o uso aumentado e indiscriminado do "kit-COVID" durante a pandemia se correlaciona com uma ocorrência aumentada de RAs.

Se ha sugerido el uso fuera de lo establecido de azitromicina, hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina (el "kit-COVID") para el tratamiento de la COVID-19 en Brasil sin evidencia clínica o científica de su eficacia. Estos medicamentos tienen reacciones adversas (RAM) conocidas. Este estudio pretendía analizar si las ventas de medicamentos del "kit-COVID" están correlacionadas con el número de reacciones adversas notificadas tras el inicio de la pandemia de COVID-19. Los datos se obtuvieron del sitio web de la Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (Anvisa) sobre las ventas y las RAM notificadas para la azitromicina, la hidroxicloroquina y la ivermectina para todos los estados brasileños. Se comparó el periodo de marzo de 2019 a febrero de 2020 (antes de la pandemia) con el de marzo de 2020 a febrero de 2021 (durante la pandemia). Se realizó un ajuste de tendencia para los datos de las series de tiempo y un análisis de correlación cruzada para investigar la correlación entre las ventas y la RAM dentro del mismo mes (lag 0) y en los meses siguientes (lag 1 y lag 2). Se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman para evaluar la magnitud de las correlaciones. Tras el inicio de la pandemia, las ventas de todos los medicamentos investigados aumentaron significativamente (69,75% para la azitromicina, 10.856.481,39% para la hidroxicloroquina y 12.291.129,32% para la ivermectina). Los niveles de RAM de todos los medicamentos, excepto la azitromicina, eran nulos antes de la pandemia, pero aumentaron tras su inicio. El análisis de correlación cruzada fue significativo en el lag 1 para todos los medicamentos a nivel nacional. La correlación de Spearman fue moderada para la azitromicina y la hidroxicloroquina, pero no para la ivermectina. Los datos deben interpretarse con cautela, ya que no se realizó una búsqueda activa de RAM. Nuestros resultados muestran que el uso creciente e indiscriminado del "kit-COVID" durante la pandemia se correlaciona con una mayor aparición de las RAM.

Uso de hidroxicloroquina en pacientes COVID ambulatorios: evaluación de interacciones y riesgo cardiaco / Use of hydroxychloroquine in outpatient COVID-19 patients: evaluation of interactions and cardiac risk

Objetivo: La hidroxicloroquina fue ampliamente utilizada al inicio de la pandemia de COVID-19 fuera de ficha técnica y con poca evidencia de eficacia. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo fue identificar inte-racciones entre hidroxicloroquina y otros fármacos con riesgo conocido de prolongar el intervalo QT, así como factores de riesgo asociados con el inicio de Torsade de Pointes, en pacientes no hospitaliza-dos diagnosticados de COVID-19.Método: La población de estudio fueron pacientes procedentes de dos áreas de salud. Se consideró toda la medicación que tuvieran prescrita. Las interacciones se analizaron con la herramienta Medsafety Scan®. Se realizó encuesta al médico de referencia. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el programa IBM® SPSS® statistics version 20.Resultados: El número medio de fármacos con capacidad de prolongar el intervalo QT por pa-ciente, incluyendo la hidroxicloroquina fue de 2,8. Se encontraron interacciones en el 93,2% de los pacientes. La mayoría de los pacientes estaban afectados por al menos 2 interacciones, aunque en pacientes institucionalizados un alto porcenta-je tenía hasta 4. La interacción más repetida fue hidroxicloroquina-antibióticos (en 85% de ellos), fundamentalmente debido al uso de azitromicina con hidroxicloroquina, hidroxicloroquina-antiácidos (38%) y hidroxicloroquina-antidepresivos (23%). La encuesta muestra que 15,3% de los pacientes tuvie-ron algún efecto adverso asociado con la hidroxi-cloroquina.Conclusiones: Los pacientes no hospitalizados fue-ron expuestos a un alto porcentaje de interacciones entre hidroxicloroquina y otros fármacos con la capacidad de prolongar el intervalo QT. Ante una eficacia no claramente demostrada para la hidroxi-cloroquina, los pacientes estuvieron expuestos a un posible riesgo innecesario.(AU)

Purpose: Hydroxychloroquine was widely used at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic with little evidence and off-label use. The objective of our work was to identify in non-hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 interactions of hydroxy-chloroquine and other drugs with known risk of prolonging the QT interval, as well as risk factors associated with the onset of Torsade de Pointes.Methods: The studied population included pa-tients at home and in nursing homes centers in two health areas. All medications prescribed were considered. The MedSafety Scan® tool was used to analyze interactions. A survey was conducted to all the doctors. Statistical analysis was performed with the IBM® SPSS® statistics version 20 program.Results: The average number of drugs with the capacity to prolong the QT interval in each patient including hydroxychloroquine was 2.8. We found interactions in 93.2% of the patients. Most were affected by, at least, 2 interactions although in insti-tutionalized patients a high percentage had up to 4. The most repeated was hydroxycholoroquine-an-tibiotics interaction (in 85% of them) mainly due to use of azithromycin with hydroxychloroquine, hy-droxychloroquine–antiacids (38%) and hydroxychlo-roquine-antidepressants (23%). The survey shows that 15.3% of the patients had some adverse effect associated with hydroxychloroquine.Conclusions: Non-hospitalized patients were ex-posed to a high percentage of interactions between hydroxychloroquine and other drugs with the ability to prolong the QT interval. Faced with a possible efficacy not clearly demonstrated for hydroxy-chloroquine, patients were exposed to a possible unnecessary risk.(AU)

Enough with the madness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 / Chega de loucura: uma revisão sistemática e metanálise de hidroxicloroquina para COVID-19

Objective: Because of preliminary results from in vitro studies, ydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) have been proposed as possible treatments for COVID-19, but the clinical evidence is discordant. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CQ and HCQ for the treatment of COVID-19. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. An electronic search was conducted in four databases for randomized controlled trials that compared HCQ or CQ with standard-of-care. A complementary search was performed. A quantitative synthesis of clinical outcomes was performed using the inverse variance method adjusting for a random-effects model. Results: In total, 16 studies were included. The meta-analysis found no significant difference between intervention and control groups in terms of mortality at the most extended follow-up (RR = 1.09, CI95% = 0.99-1.19, p-value = 0.08), patients with negative PCR results (RR = 0.99, CI95% = 0.89-1.10, p-value = 0.86), or serious adverse events (RR = 2.21, CI95% = 0.89-5.47, p-value = 0.09). HCQ was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (RR = 2.28, CI95% = 1.36-2.83, p-value < 0.01). The quality of evidence varied from very low to high. Conclusion: There is no evidence that HCQ reduces the risk of death or improves cure rates in patients with COVID-19, but it might be associated with an increased risk of adverse events

Objetivo: Devido aos resultados preliminares de estudos in vitro, a hidroxicloroquina (HCQ) e a cloroquina (CQ) foram propostas como possíveis tratamentos para a COVID-19, mas as evidências clínicas são discordantes. Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar a segurança e a eficácia da CQ e HCQ no tratamento da COVID-19. Métodos: Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática com metanálise. Uma busca eletrônica foi realizada em quatro bancos de dados por ensaios clínicos randomizados que compararam a HCQ ou CQ com o tratamento-padrão. Uma busca complementar foi realizada. Uma síntese quantitativa dos resultados foi realizada usando o método de variância inversa para um modelo de efeitos aleatórios. Resultados: No total, 16 estudos foram incluídos. A metanálise não encontrou nenhuma diferença significativa entre os grupos de intervenção e controle em termos de mortalidade no acompanhamento mais longo (RR = 1,09, IC95% = 0,99-1,19, valor-p = 0,08), pacientes com resultados de PCR negativos (RR = 0,99, IC95% = 0,89-1,10, valor-p = 0,86) ou eventos adversos graves (RR = 2,21, IC95% = 0,89-5,47, valor-p = 0,09). HCQ foi associada a um risco aumentado de eventos adversos (RR = 2,28, IC95% = 1,36-2,83, valor-p < 0,01). A qualidade da evidência variou de muito baixa a alta. Conclusão: Não há evidências de que a HCQ reduza o risco de morte ou aumente a taxa de cura em pacientes com COVID-19, mas pode estar associada a um risco aumentado de eventos adversos