Implications of Developmental 17-OHPC Exposure on the Mesocorticolimbic Serotonergic and Dopaminergic Pathways and Adolescent Mood-Related Behavior in Rats.

The synthetic progestin, 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC), is administered to pregnant individuals at risk for recurrent preterm birth during a critical period of fetal mesocorticolimbic serotonergic and dopaminergic pathway development. These pathways play an important role in regulating cognitive behaviors later in life. Despite this, there has been very little research regarding the potential long-term effects of 17-OHPC on the behavioral and neural development of exposed children. In rodents, developmental exposure to 17-OHPC disrupts serotonergic and dopaminergic innervation of the medial prefrontal cortex and impairs decision-making in complex cognitive tasks in adulthood. The present study tested the hypothesis that developmental exposure to 17-OHPC similarly disrupts the development of serotonergic and dopaminergic pathways within limbic targets and subsequent mood-related behaviors. Developmental 17-OHPC exposure significantly increased the density of serotonin transporter-IR fibers in CA1, CA2/3, and the suprapyramidal blade of dentate gyrus in hippocampus and significantly reduced the density of TH-IR fibers within the nucleus accumbens shell in males but had no effect in females during adolescence. Irregular microglia activational phenotype and number were also observed in the hippocampus of 17-OHPC-exposed males. Developmental 17-OHPC reduced the latency to immobility in males in the forced swim test but did not affect sucrose consumption in a sucrose preference test. These findings suggest that 17-OHPC exerts sex-specific effects on the development of mesocorticolimbic pathways and mood-related behavior in adolescence and highlight the need to investigate effects in adolescent children.

Progesterone therapy for prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth in a minority patient population: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The burden of prematurity underscores the need for effective risk reduction strategies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of progesterone therapy, both intramuscular 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (IM 17-OHPC) and vaginal progesterone, in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). The co-primary outcomes included: recurrent spontaneous PTB < 37 and < 34 weeks' gestation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 637 pregnant patients that delivered at any of the three hospitals within the Los Angeles County healthcare system between October 2015 and June 2021. We compared frequencies of measured variables between each of the progesterone treated groups to no treatment using Pearson chi-squared tests and independent t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. We estimated crude and adjusted associations between each specific treatment (versus no treatment) and primary outcomes using logistic regression. RESULTS: Recurrent sPTB < 37 weeks' gestation occurred in 22.3% (n = 64) of those in the no treatment group, 29.1% (n = 86, p = .077) in the 17-OHPC group, and 14.3% (n = 6, p = 0.325) in the vaginal progesterone group. Recurrent sPTB < 34 weeks' gestation was 6.6% (n = 19) in the no treatment group, 11.8% (n = 35, p = .043) in the 17-OHPC group, and 7.1% (n = 3, p = 1) in the vaginal progesterone group. Among all participants, neither 17-OHPC nor vaginal progesterone was significantly associated with a reduction in recurrent sPTB at any time point. Among those with a short cervix, IM 17-OHPC was positively associated with recurrent sPTB < 37 weeks' gestation (aOR 5.61; 95% CI 1.16, 42.9). CONCLUSIONS: Progesterone therapy of any type did not reduce the risk of recurrent sPTB < 34 or < 37 weeks' gestation compared to no progesterone therapy.

The dosing regimen for 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate was suboptimal: lessons for future pharmacotherapy for pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Makena (17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth in 2011 under the accelerated approval pathway, but fundamental pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic (Phase 1 and Phase 2) studies were not performed. At the time, there were no dose-response or concentration-response data. The therapeutic concentration was not known. The lack of such data brings into question the dosing regimen for 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and if it was optimized. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosing regimen for 17-hydroxyprogesterone by analyzing 3 data sets in which the 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate pharmacology was evaluated, namely the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Omega 3 study, the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Units study, and the Obstetrical-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers study. If an inappropriate dosing regimen could be identified, such information could inform future studies of pharmacotherapy in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the Omega 3 study were used to determine if plasma concentration was related to spontaneous preterm birth risk and if a threshold concentration could be identified. Data from the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Units study were used to determine the half-life of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and to develop a model to simulate drug concentrations with various dosing regimens. Data from the Obstetrical-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers study were used to determine the relationship between dose and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Analysis of the Omega 3 data set indicated that the risk for spontaneous preterm birth decreased as the log concentration of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate increased (odds ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.90). A steady state concentration of >9 ng/mL (equivalent to >8 ng/mL at 25-28 weeks) was associated with the lowest risk for spontaneous preterm birth (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.98; P=.04); this concentration was not achieved in 25% of subjects who received the 250 mg weekly dose. In the Obstetrical-Fetal Pharmacology Research Units study, the adjusted half-life (median and interquartile range) of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate was 14.0 (11.5-17.2) days. Simulations indicated that with the 250 mg weekly dose, >5 weekly injections were required to reach the 9 ng/mL target; however, those with the shortest half-life (corresponding to higher clearance), never reached the targeted 9 ng/mL concentration. In 75% of subjects, a loading dose of 500 mg weekly for 2 weeks followed by 250 mg weekly achieved and maintained the 9 ng/mL concentration within 2 weeks but in those 25% with the shortest half-life, concentrations exceeded the 9 ng/mL target for only 3 weeks. In the Obstetrical-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers study, all 65 subjects who received a weekly dose of 500 mg exceeded the 9 ng/mL steady state. CONCLUSION: The dosing regimen for 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate was inadequate. There is a significant inverse relationship between drug concentration and spontaneous preterm birth. The risk was lowest when the concentration exceeded 9 ng/mL, but 25% of women who received the 250 mg weekly dose never reached or maintained this concentration. The drug's long half-life necessitates a loading dose to achieve therapeutic concentrations rapidly. The omission of basic pharmacologic studies to determine the proper dosing may have compromised the effectiveness of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Future pharmacotherapy trials in pregnancy must first complete fundamental pharmacology studies.

Nationwide status of progestogen treatment to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: A questionnaire survey for childbirth healthcare facilities in Japan.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate the current status of progestogen treatment for pregnant women at a high risk for preterm birth (PTB) in childbirth healthcare facilities in Japan. METHODS: A web-based nationwide questionnaire survey regarding progestogen use for prevention of PTB was conducted among childbirth healthcare facilities from 2019 to 2021. RESULTS: Valid responses were obtained from 528 facilities (25.2% of those surveyed), including 155 tertiary perinatal facilities (making up 92.3% of all tertiary perinatal care facilities). In the survey period, progestogen treatment was implemented in 207 facilities (39.2%) for PTB prevention. Regarding types of progestogens, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate was used in 170 facilities (82.1%), with a low dose (125 mg/week) administered in 62.9% of the facilities to comply with the regulations of the national health insurance system, although 250 mg/week is considered the best dose. Vaginal progesterone was used in 36 facilities (17.4%), although the cost of vaginal progesterone was not covered by health insurance. Of the facilities not administering progestogen treatment, approximately 40% expressed that vaginal progesterone would be their first choice for PTB prevention in daily practice if it would be covered by health insurance in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the current regulations of the Japanese health insurance system, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate, rather than vaginal progesterone, was mainly used for PTB prevention. Despite global evidence supporting vaginal progesterone as the approach with the highest efficacy, only a limited number of facilities have utilized it due to the current drug use regulations in Japan.

Challenges in Using Progestin to Prevent Singleton Preterm Births: Current Knowledge and Clinical Advice.

Preterm birth is the leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality in children younger than 5 years old and accounts for approximately 35% of newborn deaths worldwide. The use of progestogen therapy for prevention of preterm birth has been one of the most controversial topics in modern obstetrics. Progestogens can be classified as natural or synthetic. Progesterone is a natural progestogen while progestins such as 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP-C) are synthetic steroid hormones. Evidence supporting the use of progestogens varies by formulation and populations studied. After more than a decade, the US Food and Drug Administration has withdrawn accelerated approval of 17OHP-C for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth in pregnant individuals with a singleton gestation. With this decision, there is no current FDA-approved treatment for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth. In this review, we provide a historical context behind the rise and fall of 17OHP-C clinical application, highlight the challenges behind the data supporting progestogen use, and offer suggestions on how to make an impact on preterm birth moving forward.

Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Intervention Trial.

Our objective was to evaluate whether pregnancy is prolonged by the use of a proteomics-based maternal serum screening test followed by treatment interventions. This is a secondary analysis of the PREVENT-PTB randomized trial comparing screening with the PreTRM test versus no screening. The primary trial analysis found no significant between-group difference in the preterm birth rate. Rather than considering a dichotomous outcome (preterm versus term), we treated gestational age at birth as a continuous variable using survival analysis. We also evaluated between-group difference in NICU length of stay and duration of respiratory support. Results indicated that pregnancy was significantly prolonged in subjects screened with the PreTRM test compared to controls (adjusted hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.78, p < 0.01). Newborns of screened subjects had significantly shorter NICU stays but no significant decrease in duration of respiratory support. In the PreTRM screen-positive group, interventions that were associated with pregnancy prolongation included care management and low-dose aspirin but not 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. We conclude that screening with the PreTRM test followed by interventions for screen-positive pregnancies may prolong pregnancy and reduce NICU LOS, but these observations need to be confirmed by additional research.

What now? A critical evaluation of over 20 years of clinical and research experience with 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for recurrent preterm birth prevention.

Spontaneous preterm birth is multifactorial, and underlying etiologies remain incompletely understood. Supplementation with progestogens, including 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate has been a mainstay of prematurity prevention strategies in the United States in the last 2 decades. Following a recent negative confirmatory trial, 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate was withdrawn from the US market and is currently available only through clinical research studies. This expert review summarized clinical and research data regarding the use of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the United States from 2003 to 2023 for recurrent prematurity prevention. In 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate. The history of the use, mechanisms of action, clinical trial results, and efficacy by clinical and biologic criteria of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate are presented. We report that disparate findings and conclusions between similarly designed rigorous studies may reflect differences in a priori risk and population incidence and extreme care should be taken in interpreting the studies and making decisions regarding efficacy of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention of preterm birth. The likelihood of improved obstetrical outcomes after receiving 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate may vary by clinical factors (eg, body mass index), plasma drug concentrations, and genetic factors, although the identification of individuals most likely to benefit remains imperfect. It is crucial for the medical community to recognize the importance of preserving the decades-long efforts invested in preventing recurrent preterm birth in the United States. Moreover, it is important that we thoroughly and thoughtfully evaluate 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate as a promising contender for future well-executed prematurity studies.

Relationship between plasma concentration of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and gestational age at preterm delivery.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate is unclear as trials have provided conflicting results. With the absence of fundamental pharmacologic studies addressing dosing or the relationship between drug concentration and gestational age at delivery, the effectiveness of the medication cannot be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between plasma concentrations of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and preterm birth rates and gestational age at preterm delivery and to assess the safety of the 500-mg dose. STUDY DESIGN: This study recruited 2 cohorts with previous spontaneous preterm birth; 1 cohort (n=143) was randomly assigned to either 250-mg or 500-mg 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate, and the other cohort (n=16) was receiving the 250-mg dose for routine care. Steady-state trough plasma concentrations of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate obtained at 26 to 30 weeks of gestation were correlated to dose, spontaneous preterm birth rates, and measures of gestational length. Furthermore, maternal and neonatal safety outcomes were evaluated according to dose. RESULTS: There was a dose proportional increase in trough plasma concentrations with the 250-mg (median, 8.6 ng/m; n=66) and 500-mg (median, 16.2 ng/mL; n=55) doses. In 116 compliant participants with blood samples, drug concentration was not related to the spontaneous preterm birth rate (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.08). However, there was a significant relationship between drug concentration and both the interval from the first administration to delivery (interval A: coefficient, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-2.23; P=.05) and the interval from the 26- to 30-week blood draw to delivery (interval B: coefficient, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-2.87; P=.02). The spontaneous preterm birth rate or measures of gestational length were not related to dose. Postenrollment cerclage adversely affected all pharmacodynamic assessments because it was a powerful predictor of spontaneous preterm birth (odds ratio, 4.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-13.19; P=.021) and both measures of gestational length (interval A [coefficient, -14.9; 95% confidence interval, -26.3 to -3.4; P=.011] and interval B [coefficient, -15.9; 95% confidence interval, -25.8 to -5.9; P=.002]). Initial cervical length was significantly related to the risk of postenrollment cerclage (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.92; P=.001). Maternal and neonatal safety outcomes were similar in both dosing groups. CONCLUSION: In this pharmacodynamic study, trough plasma 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate concentrations were significantly associated with gestational age at preterm birth but not with the preterm birth rate. Postenrollment cerclage was a powerful predictor of spontaneous preterm birth rate and gestational length. Initial cervical length predicted the risk of postenrollment cerclage. Adverse events were similar with the 500-mg and 250-mg doses of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Statement: Response to the Food and Drug Administration's withdrawal of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate.

On April 5, 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration withdrew the approval of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate, effective immediately, because of the lack of evidence that it reduces the risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. This decision withdraws approval for all formulations of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate (both intramuscular and subcutaneous) and applies to both brand name (Makena) and generic versions of the medication. We agree with the Food and Drug Administration determination and discourage continued prescribing of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate, including through compounding pharmacies. We do not recommend changing indications for cerclage, indications for vaginal progesterone in patients with a short cervix, or recommendations against activity restriction based on the Food and Drug Administration withdrawal of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate from the market. We recommend that discussion of the use of vaginal progesterone for primary prevention of recurrent preterm birth without input of cervical length or in those with a cervical length of ≥25 mm includes a shared decision-making process, especially if a progesterone formulation for preterm birth prevention was received in a previous pregnancy. The Food and Drug Administration determined that it would be inappropriate to delay the effective date of the withdrawal to allow patients currently receiving 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate to finish treatment. We agree with the Food and Drug Administration that there is no evidence of benefit with continued treatment. Patients currently receiving 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate can be counseled that the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research has not identified evidence of harm from discontinuation before 37 weeks of gestation.

Obstetric Indications for Progestin Therapy.

Specifically, meta-analyses of randomized trials demonstrate that vaginal progesterone reduces the risk of preterm birth in selected high-risk singleton pregnancies. 17-OHPC may also reduce the risk of recurrent preterm birth in singletons. Finally, one trial suggests that vaginal progesterone may also be beneficial in improving live birth rates in singletons with prior miscarriages and early pregnancy bleeding.

Racial and ethnic representation in 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate preterm birth prevention studies: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The US preterm birth rate varies dramatically by race and ethnicity yet the racial and ethnic representation within studies evaluating 17-hydroxprogesterone caproate (17-P) for preterm birth prevention is unknown. The objectives of our study were to 1) examine the racial and ethnic representation of participants in 17-P preterm birth prevention studies, 2) evaluate adherence to the NIH race and ethnicity reporting guidelines and 3) compare racial and ethnic representation in research studies to national preterm birth incidence. METHODS: We systematically reviewed US studies published between January 2000 and December 2019. Study participant's race and ethnicity were reported using descriptive statistics then compared to US 2017//2018 preterm birth data using Pearson's chi-square. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, 17 studies reported race, 11 studies reported ethnicity, and yet none of the studies followed the NIH criteria. Compared to 2017/2018 US preterm births, the proportion of black/African American study participants was significantly higher whereas the proportions of all other race categories were lower. CONCLUSIONS: More detailed reporting of race and ethnicity is needed in 17-P literature. Black women appear to be well represented while other racial and ethnic groups may be understudied.

Regional differences in utilization of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHP).

OBJECTIVES: To describe regional differences in utilization of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHP). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of a large, US commercial managed care plan claims database with pharmacy coverage from 2008 to 2018. Singleton pregnancies with at least one prior spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) were included. Regional and state-based differences in 17-OHP use were compared. Data were analyzed using t-tests and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of the 4,514 individuals with an indication for 17-OHP, 580 (12.8%) were prescribed 17-OHP. Regional and state-based differences in 17-OHP utilization were identified; Northeast 15.7%, Midwest 13.7%, South 12.0%, and West 10.4% (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: While significant regional differences in 17-OHP utilization were demonstrated, 17-OHP utilization remained low despite this cohort having insurance through a US commercial managed care plan. Suboptimal utilization demonstrates a disconnect between research and uptake in clinical practice. This underscores a need for implementation science in obstetrics to translate updated recommendations more effectively and efficiently into clinical practice.

Vaginal progesterone compared with intramuscular 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm birth in singleton gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Randomized trials have found benefits of both vaginal progesterone and 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of recurrent preterm birth. A previous meta-analysis directly comparing the two was limited by low-quality evidence, and national and international society guidelines remain conflicting regarding progestin formulation recommended for prevention of recurrent preterm birth. The aim of this updated systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal progesterone compared with 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in patients with singleton gestations and previous spontaneous preterm birth. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), SciELO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) with the use of a combination of keywords and text words related to "preterm birth," "preterm delivery," "singleton," "cervical length," "progesterone," "progestogens," "vaginal," "17-alpha-hydroxy-progesterone caproate," and "intramuscular" from inception of each database to September 2021. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials of asymptomatic singleton gestations with previous spontaneous preterm birth that were randomized to prophylactic treatment with either vaginal progesterone (ie, intervention group) or intramuscular 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (ie, comparison group). Post hoc sensitivity analysis was performed for studies with low risk of bias and studies with protocol registration. METHODS: The primary outcome was preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation. The summary measures were reported as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials including 1910 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients who received vaginal progesterone had a significantly lower rate of preterm birth at <34 weeks (14.7% vs 19.9%; relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.96), preterm birth at <37 weeks (36.0% vs 46.6%; relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.85), and preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation (7.9% vs 13.6%; relative risk, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.86), compared with women who received intramuscular 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. There were no significant differences in the rate of preterm birth at <28 weeks' gestation. Adverse drug reactions were significantly lower in the vaginal progesterone group than in the 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate group (15.6% vs 22.2%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.92). Perinatal mortality was lower in the vaginal progesterone group than in the 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate group (2.2% vs 4.4%; relative risk, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.01). In sensitivity analysis including trials rated with at least 4 Cochrane tools as of "low risk of bias," 4 trials were included (N=575), and there was no longer a significant difference in preterm birth at <34 weeks' gestation between vaginal progesterone and 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (12.2% vs 13.9%; relative risk, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.32). CONCLUSION: Overall, vaginal progesterone was superior to 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of preterm birth at <34 weeks' gestation in singleton pregnancies with previous spontaneous preterm birth. Although sensitivity analysis of high-fidelity studies showed the same trend, findings were no longer statistically significant.

¿La progesterona natural micronizada previene el trabajo de parto pretérmino?: Revisión sistemática de literatura / Does Natural Micronized Progesterone Prevent Preterm Labor?: Systematic Literature Review / A progesterona natural micronizada previne o trabalho de parto prematuro?: Revisão sistemática da literatura

Introducción. La progesterona es una hormona que favorece el mantenimiento del embarazo, es la protagonista de la fisiopatología del trabajo de parto pretérmino. De esta manera, se propone realizar una revisión sistemática que permita demostrar la utilidad de la progesterona natural micronizada en la mitigación de los efectos deletéreos del trabajo de parto pretérmino. Metodología. Revisión sistemática en la que se utilizaron los términos "MeSH" y "No ­ MeSH". Se empleó el programa "Publish or Perish" y bases de datos como: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Key, Cochrane Library, Scopus y Google Scholar. Se incluyeron artículos de revisión, meta-análisis, artículos originales (publicaciones preliminares o completas), resúmenes de congresos, seminarios publicados, libros de texto, protocolos hospitalarios regionales y consensos nacionales, en donde cada autor evaluó individualmente cada artículo y aplicó la herramienta CASPE. Resultados. En la literatura no es posible encontrar pautas concisas internacionales sobre el uso de la progesterona micronizada frente a la amenaza de trabajo de parto pretérmino (TPP). En general, para la mitigación del trabajo de parto, según lo analizado por los autores, se recomienda usar progesterona natural micronizada en cápsulas de 100 a 400 mg/día vía oral o 100 a 200 mg cada 12 a 24 horas vía vaginal. Desde la semana 16 hasta la semana 36 de gestación por vía oral y desde la semana 24 a 34 de gestación por vía vaginal. Discusión. El uso de la progesterona micronizada ha demostrado mitigar complicaciones posteriores al trabajo de parto pretérmino, sin embargo, no hay consenso sobre la dosificación y las vías de administración. Sumado a lo anterior, los estudios analizados pueden contener sesgos, por lo que se deja a elección del clínico el uso este medicamento. Conclusiones. La progesterona natural micronizada podría ser empleada para mitigar el trabajo de parto pretérmino según los artículos analizados por los autores a lo largo de la revisión. Sin embargo, se necesitan más estudios para legitimar dicha hipótesis.

Introduction. Progesterone is a hormone that favors maintaining pregnancy. It is the protagonist of the physiopathology of preterm labor. In this sense, a systematic review is proposed to demonstrate the usefulness of natural micronized progesterone in mitigating the harmful effects of preterm labor. Methodology. A systematic review in which the terms "MeSH" and "No ­ MeSH" were used. The "Publish or Perish" program was used, as well as databases, such as: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Key, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Review and meta-analysis articles, original articles (preliminary or complete publications), congress summaries, published seminars, textbooks, regional hospital protocols and national consensuses were included, in which each author individually assessed each article and applied the CASPE tool. Results. It was not possible to find concise international guidelines on using micronized progesterone for the threat of preterm labor (PTL) in literature. According to what the authors analyzed, for the mitigation of labor it is generally recommended the use of natural micronized progesterone in 100 to 400 mg/day capsules orally or 100 to 200 mg every 12 to 24 hours through the vagina. From week 16 to week 36 of pregnancy orally and from week 24 to 34 through the vagina. Discussion. Using micronized progesterone has demonstrated mitigating complications subsequent to preterm labor. However, there is no consensus on dosage and routes of administration. Added to the above, the analyzed studies may contain biases, reason why using this medication is left to the physician's discretion. Conclusions. Natural micronized progesterone can be used to mitigate preterm labor according to the articles the authors analyzed throughout the review. However, more studies are needed to validate this hypothesis.

Introdução. A progesterona é um hormônio que favorece a manutenção da gravidez, é a protagonista da fisiopatologia do parto prematuro. Dessa forma, propõe-se a realização de uma revisão sistemática que permita demonstrar a utilidade da progesterona natural micronizada na mitigação dos efeitos deletérios do trabalho de parto prematuro. Metodologia. Revisão sistemática em que foram utilizados os termos "MeSH" e "Não­MeSH". Foram utilizados o programa "Publish or Perish" e bases de dados como: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Key, Cochrane Library, Scopus e Google Scholar. Foram incluídos artigos de revisão, meta-análises, artigos originais (publicações preliminares ou completas), resumos de congressos, seminários publicados, livros didáticos, protocolos hospitalares regionais e consensos nacionais, onde cada autor avaliou individualmente cada artigo e aplicou a ferramenta CASPE. Resultados. Não é possível encontrar na literatura diretrizes internacionais concisas sobre o uso de progesterona micronizada diante da ameaça de trabalho de parto prematuro (TPP). Em geral, para a mitigação do trabalho de parto, conforme analisado pelos autores, recomenda-se o uso de progesterona natural micronizada em cápsulas de 100 a 400mg/dia por via oral ou 100 a 200mg a cada 12 a 24 horas por via vaginal. Da 16ª à 36ª semana de gestação por via oral e da 24ª à 34ª semana de gestação por via vaginal. Discussão. O uso de progesterona micronizada demonstrou mitigar as complicações após o trabalho de parto prematuro, no entanto, não há consenso sobre a dosagem e as vias de administração. Além do exposto, os estudos analisados podem conter vieses, pelo que cabe ao médico escolher o uso deste medicamento. Conclusões. A progesterona natural micronizada poderia ser utilizada para mitigar o trabalho de parto prematuro de acordo com os artigos analisados pelos autores ao longo da revisão. No entanto, mais estudos são necessários para legitimar essa hipótese.

Does vaginal progesterone prevent recurrent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation and a history of spontaneous preterm birth? Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of vaginal progesterone to prevent recurrent preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a history of spontaneous preterm birth. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and CINAHL (from their inception to February 28, 2022), Cochrane databases, Google Scholar, bibliographies, and conference proceedings. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that compared vaginal progesterone to placebo or no treatment in asymptomatic women with a singleton gestation and a history of spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS: The primary outcomes were preterm birth <37 and <34 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes included adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies, heterogeneity (I2 test), small-study effects, publication bias, and quality of evidence; performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses; and calculated 95% prediction intervals and adjusted relative risks. RESULTS: Ten studies (2958 women) met the inclusion criteria: 7 with a sample size <150 (small studies) and 3 with a sample size >600 (large studies). Among the 7 small studies, 4 were at high risk of bias, 2 were at some concerns of bias, and only 1 was at low risk of bias. All the large studies were at low risk of bias. Vaginal progesterone significantly decreased the risk of preterm birth <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.81; I2=75%; 95% prediction interval, 0.31-1.32; very low-quality evidence) and <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.92; I2=66%; 95% prediction interval, 0.23-1.68; very low-quality evidence), and the risk of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.85; I2=67%; 95% prediction interval, 0.16-1.79; low-quality evidence). There were no significant differences between the vaginal progesterone and the placebo or no treatment groups in other adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes. Subgroup analyses revealed that vaginal progesterone decreased the risk of preterm birth <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.55; I2=0%) and <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.49; I2=0%) in the small but not in the large studies (relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.09; I2=0% for preterm birth <37 weeks; and relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.13; I2=0% for preterm birth <34 weeks). Sensitivity analyses restricted to studies at low risk of bias indicated that vaginal progesterone did not reduce the risk of preterm birth <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.09) and <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.15). There was clear evidence of substantial small-study effects in the meta-analyses of preterm birth <37 and <34 weeks of gestation because of funnel plot asymmetry and the marked differences in the pooled relative risks obtained from fixed-effect and random-effects models. The adjustment for small-study effects resulted in a markedly reduced and nonsignificant effect of vaginal progesterone on preterm birth <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.10) and <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.42). CONCLUSION: There is no convincing evidence supporting the use of vaginal progesterone to prevent recurrent preterm birth or to improve perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a history of spontaneous preterm birth.

Comparison of oral Dydrogesterone and 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caprate in the prevention of preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) remains a significant problem in obstetric care. Progesterone supplements are believed to reduce the rate of preterm labor, but formulation, type of administration, and dosage varies in different studies. This study was performed to compare oral Dydrogesterone with intramuscular 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17α-OHPC) administration in prevention of PTB. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, we studied 150 women with singleton pregnancy in 28Th-34Th Gestational week, who had received tocolytic treatment for preterm labor. Participants were divided to receive 30 mg oral Dydrogesterone daily, 250 mg intramuscular 17α-OHPC weekly, or no intervention (control group). All treatments were continued until 37Th Week or delivery, whichever occurred earlier. Obstetric outcomes, including latency period, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal mortality were recorded. All patients were monitored biweekly until delivery. RESULTS: Baseline gestational age was not significantly different between groups. Latency period was significantly longer in the progesterone group compared with Dydrogesterone and control groups (41.06 ± 17.29 vs. 29.44 ± 15.6 and 22.20 ± 4.51 days, respectively; P < 0.001). The progesterone group showed significantly better results compared with the other two groups, in terms of gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and Apgar score (P < 0.001). None of the participants showed severe complications, stillbirth, or gestational diabetes. CONCLUSION: Progesterone caproate can strongly prolong the latency period and improve neonatal outcomes and therefore, is superior to oral Dydrogesterone in the prevention of PTB.

17α-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Inhibits Cytokine Production via Suppression of NF-κB Activation.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients with elevated levels of circulating cytokines contributing to various clinical symptoms. Favorable control of CRS represents a promising and effective strategy to mitigate the clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with moderate to severe pneumonia. Using in vivo cytokine release assay in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-engrafted immunodeficient mice, we reported that 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC), a synthetic progestogen, exhibited significant inhibition of OKT-3-stimulated production of numerous cytokines including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and GM-CSF. Furthermore, 17-OHPC inhibited in vitro production of IFN-γ, IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-10 in human PBMCs stimulated with OKT3, while exhibiting down-regulation of the mRNA levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-10. Using the same human PBMCs, additional stimulators anti-CD28 antibody or PHA treatments led to substantial cytokine production, which was also attenuated by 17-OHPC. OKT3-stimulated phosphorylation of IκBα and nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 in human PBMCs were also reversed by 17-OHPC, suggesting its inhibition on NF-κB signaling in immune cells. Taken together, this work reported both in vivo and in vitro inhibition of cytokine production by 17-OHPC, presumably by virtue of its suppression of NF-κB signaling. These findings provide pharmacological evidence to support the potential application of 17-OHPC in treating CRS associated with COVID-19.

Vaginal progesterone vs intramuscular 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, and previous preterm birth is one of the strongest risk factors for preterm birth. National and international obstetrical societies have different recommendations regarding progesterone formulation for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether vaginal progesterone is superior to 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of recurrent preterm birth in patients with singleton pregnancies who had a previous spontaneous preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial at 5 US centers of patients with singleton pregnancies at <24 weeks of gestation who had a previous spontaneous preterm birth randomized 1:1 to either 200 mg vaginal progesterone suppository nightly or 250 mg intramuscular 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate weekly from 16 to 36 weeks of gestation. Based on the estimated recurrent preterm birth rate of 36% with 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate, 95 participants were needed in each arm to detect a 50% reduction in preterm birth rate with vaginal progesterone, with 80% power and 2-sided alpha of 0.05. The primary outcome was preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation. Prespecified secondary outcomes included preterm birth at <34 and <28 weeks of gestation, mean gestational age at delivery, neonatal morbidity and mortality, and measures of adherence. Analysis was by intention to treat. The chi-square test and Student t test were used as appropriate. P<.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Overall, 205 participants were randomized; 94 participants in the vaginal progesterone group and 94 participants in 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate group were included. Although gestational age at enrollment was similar, those assigned to vaginal progesterone initiated therapy earlier (16.9±1.4 vs 17.8±2.5 weeks; P=.001). Overall continuation of assigned formulation until delivery was similar (73% vs 69%; P=.61). There was no significant difference in preterm birth at <37 (31% vs 38%; P=.28; relative risk, 0.81 [95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.20]), <34 (9.6% vs 14.9%; P=.26; relative risk, 0.64 [95% confidence interval, 0.29-1.41]), or <28 (1.1% vs 4.3%; P=.37; relative risk, 0.25 [95% confidence interval, 0.03-2.20]) weeks of gestation. Participants in the vaginal progesterone group had a later mean gestational age at delivery than participants in the 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate group (37.36±2.72 vs 36.34±4.10 weeks; mean difference, 1.02 [95% confidence interval, 0.01-2.01]; P=.047). CONCLUSION: Vaginal progesterone did not reduce the risk of recurrent preterm birth by 50% compared with 17-OHPC; however, vaginal progesterone may lead to increased latency to delivery. This trial was underpowered to detect a smaller, but still clinically significant, difference in the efficacy of preterm birth prevention. Patient factors that impact adherence and ability to obtain medication in a timely fashion should be included in counseling on progesterone selection.

17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate and risk for venous thromboembolism during pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17 P) is a progestin commonly used during pregnancy to reduce risk of recurrent preterm birth. History of thromboembolism is a contraindication to 17 P and the package insert for 17 P recommends discontinuation in the setting of an acute VTE event. The objective of this study was to determine whether 17 P is associated with increased risk of VTE. STUDY DESIGN: The MarketScan claims database was used to perform a retrospective cohort of women who underwent delivery from 4/2008 to 1/2015. We identified women who received 17 P during pregnancy based on pharmacy benefits. Risk for VTE including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or both was stratified based on the presence or absence of 17 P pharmacy receipt. Both antenatal and delivery hospitalization VTE events were asceratined and these periods were analyzed individually. Relative risk (RR) was determined based on 17 P receipt. RESULTS: Among 4,775,667 delivery hospitalizations, 18,745 women received 17 P. Among women who did not receive 17 P, 0.52% of women (n = 24,529) had a VTE diagnosis compared to 0.61% (n = 114) receiving 17 P (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.98-1.42). Comparing VTE events (i) during the antenatal period and (ii) during delivery hospitalizations, risks did not differ significantly for patients receiving 17 P. When risk was restricted to the cohort of patients without a diagnosis of a prior VTE event, 0.30% of women (n = 56) receiving 17 P were diagnosed with an event versus 0.28% of women (n = 13,427) not receiving 17 P (RR 1.07, 95% 0.82-1.39). DISCUSSION: No significant increased risk for VTE was noted with 17 P receipt. While new research has led to reconsideration of clinical use of 17 P for preterm birth prevention based on efficacy, findings from this analysis do not support major risk for thrombosis.