Primary tumour iodine avidity in relation to uptake in persistent metastatic disease in papillary and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with persistent or recurrent papillary and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer can be effectively treated with radioiodine, if the tumour tissue is iodine-avid. However, iodine-avidity status is often unknown at the time of initial radioiodine treatment, limiting any adaptive approach. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between pre-therapeutic iodine avidity in primary tumour tissue, initial lymph node metastases and iodine uptake in subsequent metastases. METHODS: Iodine avidity was prospectively assessed pre-therapeutically in 35 patients by injection of tracer amounts of iodine-131 two days prior to surgery. Iodine concentrations in resected tissue samples were measured, enabling accurate and histologically verifiable iodine avidity data for both primary tumour and initial lymph node metastases. Iodine uptake in persistent metastatic disease was assessed by review of radiology, and treatment response was examined through journal studies. RESULTS: Out of data from 35 patients, 10 had persistent disease at presentation or during follow-up (range 19-46 months). Four patients had non-avid persistent metastatic disease, all with low iodine avidity in their primary tumours and initial lymph node metastases. Patients with low pre-therapeutic iodine avidity did not appear to have greater risk of persistent disease. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a close link between pre-therapeutically measured iodine concentrations in primary tumours with iodine avidity of any subsequent metastases.

Iodine avidity in papillary and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer is predicted by immunohistochemical and molecular work-up.

Background: Successful radioiodine treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer requires iodine avidity: that is, the concentration and retention of iodine in cancer tissue. Several parameters have previously been linked with lower iodine avidity. However, a comprehensive analysis of which factors best predict iodine avidity status, and the magnitude of their impact, is lacking. Methods: Quantitative measurements of iodine avidity in surgical specimens (primary tumour and lymph node metastases) of 28 patients were compared to immunohistochemical expression of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor, thyroid peroxidase (TPO), pendrin, sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) and mutational status of BRAF and the TERT promoter. Regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of poor iodine avidity. Results: Mutations in BRAF and the TERT promoter were significantly associated with lower iodine avidity for lymph node metastases (18-fold and 10-fold, respectively). Membranous NIS localisation was found only in two cases but was significantly associated with high iodine avidity. TPO expression was significantly correlated with iodine avidity (r = 0.44). The multivariable modelling showed that tumour tissue localisation (primary tumour or lymph node metastasis), histological subtype, TPO and NIS expression and TERT promoter mutation were each independent predictors of iodine avidity that could explain 68% of the observed variation of iodine avidity. Conclusions: A model based on histological subtype, TPO and NIS expression and TERT promoter mutation, all evaluated on initial surgical material, can predict iodine avidity in thyroid cancer tissue ahead of treatment. This could inform early adaptation with respect to expected treatment effect.

Pre-Therapeutic Measurements of Iodine Avidity in Papillary and Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Reveal Associations with Thyroglobulin Expression, Histological Variants and Ki-67 Index.

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) are treated with radioiodine to reduce recurrence and to treat the spread of disease. Adequate iodine accumulation in cancer tissue, iodine avidity, is important for treatment effect. This study investigated which clinical and histological tumour characteristics correlate with avidity. To quantify avidity in cancer tissue, tracer amounts of iodine-131 were given to 45 patients with cytologically confirmed thyroid cancer. At pathology grossing, representative samples of tumour and lymph nodes were taken and subjected to radioactivity quantification ex vivo to determine avidity. Afterwards, samples underwent extended pathology work-up and analysis. We found that tumoural Tg expression and Ki-67 index were correlated with avidity, whereas tumour size and pT stage were not. The histological variant of thyroid cancer was also correlated with iodine avidity. Variants associated with worse clinical prognoses displayed lower avidity than variants with better prognoses. This work provides new information on which tumours have low iodine avidity. Lower avidity in aggressive histological PTC variants may explain their overall poorer prognoses. Our findings also suggest that radioiodine dosage could be adapted to Tg expression, Ki-67 index or histological variant instead of pT stage, potentially improving the efficacy of radioiodine therapy.

Detection of RET rearrangements in papillary thyroid carcinoma using RT-PCR and FISH techniques - A molecular and clinical analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Oncogenic BRAF and RAS mutations as well as multiple known (and yet unknown) RET fusion oncogenes comprise the majority of causative molecular alterations in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Apparently "mutation-negative" PTCs encompass a heterogenous group impeding analysis of prognostic significance of underlying genetics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: BRAF wild type PTC tissue of 56 patients was analyzed using two established methods: hybrid-specific RT-PCR for the predominant rearrangement RET/PTC1 and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Clinical features of the cases with and without RET rearrangement were compared (patient age, gender, tumor size, focality, lymph node affection, and iodine avidity). RESULTS: RT-PCR revealed RET/PTC1 rearrangements in five of 56 tumors (9%). FISH confirmed these, and identified four additional RET rearrangements (9/56; 16%). Loss of the iodine avidity only occurred in cases of RET/PTC hybrids (7/9 tumors), but not in RET/PTC-negative PTCs (0/41 tumors with available uptake information; p = 0.029). The risk to develop lymph node metastases was eight times higher in presence of RET rearrangements (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: FISH analysis, in contrast to hybrid-specific RT-PCR, revealed infrequent and unknown RET fusion genes. The presence of RET rearrangements was associated with a significantly elevated risk to develop iodine refractory disease and lymph node metastases. Of note, significant clinical discrimination was only achievable when taking the FISH results into account; differences would have been missed when using the RT-PCR method only. Increasing evidence of the clinical impact of RET/PTC-positivity may influence the decision on the extent of surgical resection, especially on lymph node dissection, in PTCs.

Prognostic markers in well differentiated papillary and follicular thyroid cancer (WDTC).

OBJECTIVES: WDTC (papillary and follicular thyroid cancer) make up around 90% of all thyroid tumours. Overall, the prognosis in patients with WDTC is excellent. However, there are small cohorts of patients who experience a more aggressive form of disease which is often associated with certain poor prognostic factors. Identifying these patients at an early stage is imperative for guiding treatment decisions. With recent developments in this area we plan to discuss the current evidence surrounding prognostic markers. METHODS: The literature regarding prognostic factors in WDTC was reviewed using an electronic database Medline - Pubmed. Using the MeSH search engine specific prognostic factors including age, size, grade, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, extension/invasion, ethnic background, radioactive iodine avidity, and thyroglobulin level and their association with WDTC were evaluated. A broader search of prognostic markers in thyroid cancer was also carried out to avoid missing other pertinent markers. RESULTS: Multiple clinical and pathologic variables have been shown to be poor prognostic factors in WDTC with statistical significance. Extensive extrathyroidal extension and age may be the most important factors when predicting clinical outcomes in WDTC, although the age threshold may be increased from 45 to 55 years in due course. CONCLUSIONS: Management of WDTC has changed considerably over the last two years as reflected in evolving British and American Thyroid Guidelines. In all cases a combined multi-disciplinary approach, with consideration of the available guidelines and stratification systems should be utilised when planning an individualised treatment program to offer the best contemporary care to WDTC patients.