A narrative review of the literature: The role of biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. Though there have been significant advancements in targeted therapies in skin diseases such as psoriasis or eczema, the progress in the treatment of vitiligo has been slow, with minimal studies assessing the effect of biologics, though there has been recent evidence of the effectiveness of JAK inhibition. This paper reviews the published case reports and studies for the use of systemic targeted therapies including biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in the treatment of pediatric AD. RECENT FINDINGS: Adolescents with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis (AD) need systemic therapies, as stated several recent practice guidelines. (JAKi) have shown their efficacy in the treatment of adult AD, however, there is a lack of information concerning efficacy and safety of their use in pediatric AD. We found that the JAKi's abrocitinib (ABRO), baricitinib (BARI), and upadacitinib (UPA), are all an effective treatment option with a very fast onset of action for adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. BARI was not effective in children between 2 and 10 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Fortunately, major safety issues with JAKi in adolescents with AD have not been documented in the trials, so far, contrasting with the reports in adults with AD, where these events have very rarely occurred. There are some reports of herpes zoster (HZ) infection in adolescents on JAKi, but it is not a major safety concern. Acne is a relatively common AE with UPA in adolescents; however, it is responsive to standard treatment. This review will help the clinician to choose among the JAKi according to the needs and clinical features of patients with moderate and severe AD. In the following years, with the advent of new biologicals and JAKi, these therapies will fall into place in each phase of the evolution of patients with AD.

Exploring the Complexities of Atopic Dermatitis: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent inflammatory skin condition impacting both children and adults globally, with a prevalence of 15-30%. It ranks as the most prevalent skin disorder based on disability-adjusted life-years by the World Health Organization. It presents with symptoms like skin irritation, redness, dryness, itchiness, and vesicular blisters and commonly coexists with other atopic symptoms like allergic rhinitis, asthma, and food allergies. The pathophysiology involves a complex interplay of genetic predispositions, immunological dysfunctions, and environmental factors leading to tissue inflammation and disrupted skin barrier integrity. Alopecia areata is characterized by nonscarring hair loss and shares correlations with AD including a higher prevalence of atopic diseases, shared intracellular mechanisms involving the JAK-STAT pathway, and potential treatment overlap such as dupilumab. These correlations could direct new areas of research and increased insight for both diseases. Treatment of AD requires a personalized approach due to its complex, multifactorial nature integrating nonpharmacological interventions like skin hydration and trigger avoidance as well as topical and systemic approaches, if necessary, with topical corticosteroids being the first line for flares; long term corticosteroid use poses risk for adverse effects like skin atrophy. Severe cases may require systemic treatments or phototherapy. Future treatment prospects include targeting the dysbiotic microbiome and identifying biomarkers for tailored therapeutic strategies, emphasizing the importance of personalized medicine in optimizing AD management.

Treatment of Refractory Segmental Vitiligo and Alopecia Areata in a Child with Upadacitinib and NB-UVB: A Case Report.

Vitiligo and alopecia areata are both autoimmune skin diseases, and the chances of co-occurrence are very low. Conventional treatments often include glucocorticoids, which have many adverse reactions with long-term use and are difficult to achieve satisfactory results. Upadacitinib has been found to be effective in both vitiligo and alopecia areata due to partial overlap in pathogenic pathways. We report the successful treatment of vitiligo combined with alopecia areata in a nine-year-old child with upadacitinib in combination with UVB. The area of vitiligo and alopecia areata decreased significantly, and satisfactory results were obtained. It provides a new idea for the treatment of vitiligo complicated with alopecia areata in children.

Case report: Psoriasiform eczema with immune-mediated comorbidities treated with upadacitinib.

Immune-mediated comorbidities in patients with psoriasiform eczema are common. It can be challenging to manage multiple immune-mediated diseases, especially considering that biologic treatments are prone to causing paradoxical effects. The aim of this retrospective observational case series was to describe the course of both psoriasiform eczema and immune-mediated comorbidities in five patients treated with upadacitinib for psoriasiform dermatitis. Five patients, all male, were included. All the patients suffered from psoriasiform eczema. Moreover, two of the patients suffered from alopecia areata, two from vitiligo, one from ulcerative colitis and one from hidradenitis suppurativa. In all cases, the treatment with upadacitinib was rapidly effective on the eczema. The effectiveness on alopecia areata was good in both cases, while the results on vitiligo were only partial. The only case of ulcerative colitis achieved complete remission, while the case of hidradenitis suppurativa experience partial improvement. In conclusion, upadacitinib was effective in treating not only psoriasiform eczema, but also several immune mediated comorbidities. Additional studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of upadacitinib in alopecia areata, vitiligo and hidradenitis suppurativa.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability, and Exploratory Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Children with Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor approved for treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents, in children with severe AD. METHODS: In an open-label, multiple-dose, Phase 1 study, pediatric patients with severe AD from two age groups (2 to <6 years and 6 to <12 years) received bodyweight-based dosing regimens of upadacitinib using either twice-daily immediate-release (IR) oral solution or once-daily extended-release (ER) tablets. A pharmacokinetic assessment was conducted on Day 7 of the study, which was followed by a long-term safety and exploratory efficacy evaluation for up to 108 weeks. The results reported here are based on an interim analysis when the study had completed enrollment and pharmacokinetic assessment. FINDINGS: A total of 35 patients were enrolled and received upadacitinib. The maximum upadacitinib plasma concentration was attained within a median time of 0.5 to 2 hours and 2 to 2.5 hours for the IR oral solution and ER tablet formulations, respectively. Upadacitinib functional half-life was generally shorter with IR oral solution relative to ER tablets. Upadacitinib apparent oral clearance decreased with decreasing body weight in the pediatric patients enrolled in this study. Upadacitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. The most common (≥3 patients) adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection, COVID-19 infection, headache, abdominal discomfort, vomiting, asthma, and cough. No new safety risks were identified compared to the known safety profile for upadacitinib in adults and adolescents. In the 30 patients with available exploratory efficacy data at Week 12, 36.7% achieved validated Investigator's Global Assessment scale for AD score of 0 or 1 (Validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD 0/1), and 70.0% had Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement of at least 75% (EASI 75). IMPLICATIONS: The characterized pharmacokinetic profiles in this study, together with the observed safety and exploratory efficacy results, support further investigation of the current upadacitinib dosing regimen in future confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trials in children with AD. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03646604, registered 2018-08-23.

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Meta-Analysis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disorder. Topical corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy in mild AD, whereas the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib is approved in the United States, Europe, and other countries for treating moderate-severe AD in adults and children over 12 years old whose disease is not adequately controlled with other systemic drugs, including biologics. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate to severe AD. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate to severe AD were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed a significant proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI 75) (R.R. = 3.86; 95% CI = 3.12 to 4.78, p < 0.00001), EASI 100 (R.R. = 13.09; 95% CI = 7.40 to 23.17, p < 0.00001), Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Score (WP-NRS) response (R.R. = 4.44; 95% CI = 3.72 to 5.29, p< 0.00001), and validated Investigator's Global Assessment (v-IGA) (RR = 5.96; 95% CI = 4.79 to 7.41, p < 0. 00001) in the upadacitinib arm compared to the placebo arm. Moreover, the pooled analysis also suggested that treatment-emergent adverse events (TAEs) were relatively higher with upadacitinib than with placebo, but were mild and easily manageable (R.R. = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.23, p<0.00001). This meta-analysis showed that upadacitinib had a significant beneficial effect and tolerable adverse effect profile in patients with moderate and severe AD. Dose regimens of 15 mg and 30 mg seemed to have similar benefits. However, further trials are needed to assess long-term efficacy and safety profile.

Upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy and safety through 5 years in the SELECT-EARLY randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy over 5 years among MTX-naïve patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-EARLY trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg or MTX. Patients who did not achieve CDAI remission and had < 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts at week 26 received rescue therapy (addition of MTX in the upadacitinib group and addition of upadacitinib in the MTX group). Efficacy assessments were evaluated over 5 years and are reported as observed (AO) for patients who received continuous monotherapy with upadacitinib 15/30 mg or MTX and by randomized group applying non-responder imputation (NRI). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) per 100 patient-years were summarized over 5 years. RESULTS: Of 945 patients randomized and treated, 775 (82%) completed week 48 and entered the LTE on study drug. Higher proportions of patients consistently achieved disease activity targets over 5 years with upadacitinib than MTX. In AO analyses, 53%/59% of patients attained CDAI remission with upadacitinib 15/30 mg versus 43% with MTX at week 260. NRI analyses showed better CDAI, DAS28(CRP), and ACR responses with upadacitinib relative to MTX at week 260 (all comparisons, nominal P < .001). Upadacitinib treatment also resulted in numerically greater inhibition of structural joint progression through week 260 compared to MTX. Most TEAEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were numerically higher in patients receiving upadacitinib 30 mg. Rates of serious infections, herpes zoster, creatine phosphokinase elevation, nonmelanoma skin cancer, and neutropenia were numerically higher with upadacitinib than MTX. The observed safety profile of upadacitinib over 5 years was consistent with earlier trial results and integrated phase 3 safety analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib showed better clinical responses versus MTX in patients with RA throughout the 5-year trial. Higher rates of several AEs were observed with upadacitinib, especially in the 30 mg group, compared to MTX. When used as monotherapy in MTX-naïve patients, the approved upadacitinib 15 mg dose showed better long-term efficacy versus MTX and an overall favorable benefit-risk profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02706873.

Oncostatin M-driven macrophage-fibroblast circuits as a drug target in autoimmune arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Recent single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis revealed the functional heterogeneity and pathogenic cell subsets in immune cells, synovial fibroblasts and bone cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). JAK inhibitors which ameliorate joint inflammation and bone destruction in RA, suppress the activation of various types of cells in vitro. However, the key cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the potent clinical effects of JAK inhibitors on RA remain to be determined. Our aim is to identify a therapeutic target for JAK inhibitors in vivo. METHODS: We performed scRNA-seq analysis of the synovium of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice treated with or without a JAK inhibitor, followed by a computational analysis to identify the drug target cells and signaling pathways. We utilized integrated human RA scRNA-seq datasets and genetically modified mice administered with the JAK inhibitor for the confirmation of our findings. RESULTS: scRNA-seq analysis revealed that oncostatin M (OSM) driven macrophage-fibroblast interaction is highly activated under arthritic conditions. OSM derived from macrophages, acts on OSM receptor (OSMR)-expressing synovial fibroblasts, activating both inflammatory and tissue-destructive subsets. Inflammatory synovial fibroblasts stimulate macrophages, mainly through IL-6, to exacerbate inflammation. Tissue-destructive synovial fibroblasts promote osteoclast differentiation by producing RANKL to accelerate bone destruction. scRNA-seq analysis also revealed that OSM-signaling in synovial fibroblasts is the main signaling pathway targeted by JAK inhibitors in vivo. Mice specifically lacking OSMR in synovial fibroblasts (Osmr∆Fibro) displayed ameliorated inflammation and joint destruction in arthritis. The JAK inhibitor was effective on the arthritis of the control mice while it had no effect on the arthritis of Osmr∆Fibro mice. CONCLUSIONS: OSM functions as one of the key cytokines mediating pathogenic macrophage-fibroblast interaction. OSM-signaling in synovial fibroblasts is one of the main signaling pathways targeted by JAK inhibitors in vivo. The critical role of fibroblast-OSM signaling in autoimmune arthritis was shown by a combination of mice specifically deficient for OSMR in synovial fibroblasts and administration of the JAK inhibitor. Thus, the OSM-driven synovial macrophage-fibroblast circuit is proven to be a key driver of autoimmune arthritis, serving as a crucial drug target in vivo.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the risk of malignancy with biologic therapies and selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitors in atopic dermatitis.

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with multifactorial pathophysiology. Biologic therapies, including dupilumab (IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor) and tralokinumab (IL-13 inhibitor), as well as selective Janus kinase-1 (JAK-1) inhibitors such as upadacitinib and abrocitinib, have been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe AD. However, their association with the incidence of malignancy in AD patients remains uncertain. Aim: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate and compare the indidence and risk of malignancy in individuals with moderate-to-severe AD treated with abrocitinib, upadacitinib, tralokinumab, or dupilumab. Material and methods: Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE that included AD, malignancy, biologic and advanced therapies. The primary outcome was incidence of malignancy in AD patients receiving placebo or at least one of the following advanced therapies: dupilumab, tralokinumab, abrocitinib or upadacitinib. A random-effects NMA was conducted with odds ratios and a frequentist model. Results: Our search identified 11 trials comprising 10097 patients. The NMA did not show any statistically significant association between dupilumab or selective JAK-1 inhibitors and the incidence of malignancy up to an average of 41 weeks of treatment. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed no statistically significant increased risk of malignancy and no significant difference in the incidence of malignancy between selective JAK-1 inhibitors and dupilumab for the treatment of AD up to an average follow-up of 41 weeks. Nevertheless, further prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to confirm the safety of these therapies and their impact on the risk of malignancy.

Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic steroids, oral JAK inhibitors and Contact Immunotherapy in the Treatment of severe alopecia areata: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Severe alopecia areata (AA) is a nonscarring hair loss for immune disorder and SALT score ≥ 50%. The guidelines for managing patients with severe AA suggest treatments: systemic steroids, JAK inhibitors, and contact immunotherapy. However, there is a lack of evidence indicating the superiority of one treatment over another. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the most effective treatment for severe AA through network meta-analysis. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a network meta-analysis. The literature search was retrieved across four databases. The Cochrane 5.1 risk of bias assessment tool and ROBINS-I tool assessed quality of the included studies. Subsequently, efficacy and safety comparisons among the three treatments were conducted using Stata 14.0 on account of the frequency method. The SUCRA rank indicated that oral dexamethasone (95.9%) > diphenylcyclopropenone(DPCP) (74.5%) > oral ritlecitinib (62.6%) > oral baricitinib (46.9%) > squaric acid dibutyl ester(SADBE) (20.1%) > placebo (0.0%) from high to low in the aspect of improving efficacy. As for safety, placebo(88.4%) > oral ritlecitinib (86.5%) > oral baricitinib (62.1%) > SADBE (37.0%) > oral dexamethasone(22.3%) > DPCP(3.8%) in the aspect of decreasing adverse events. Oral dexamethasone and DPCP showed superior efficacy compared to oral ritlecitinib and oral baricitinib. However, in terms of safety, oral ritlecitinib was preferable. Some adverse events associated with oral dexamethasone and DPCP were intolerable to patients, whereas those related to oral ritlecitinib and oral baricitinib were more manageable. Overall, ritlecitinib and baricitinib remain promising drugs in the future treatment of severe AA.

Treatment of rosacea with upadacitinib and abrocitinib: case report and review of evidence for Janus kinase inhibition in rosacea.

Introduction: Conventional rosacea treatments are not uniformly pervasive, and the adverse reactions can potentially constrain their utility. The clinical use of JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib in the treatment of refractory rosacea has rarely been explored. Case report: We presented two cases of patients who received the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib and four cases of patients who received the JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib for the treatment of refractory rosacea. Discussion: The JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib may be promising medical options for patients with refractory rosacea. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib and abrocitinib require prospective controlled studies to assess them more comprehensively.

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata.

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease of the hair follicles. Although some cases resolve spontaneously, many patients require some form of treatment, including corticosteroids and vitamin D analogues, among others. Cytokine signaling in autoimmune disorders and their inhibition have been the prime objective in therapeutic research over the past few years. Janus kinase inhibitors such as tofacitinib have shown efficacy in the treatment of AA. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel formulation of topical tofacitinib compared to vehicle in patients with AA. Materials and Methods: A prospective, non-blinded, intrasubject vehicle-controlled study was conducted in patients with AA for a total duration of 6 months. A 2% tofacitinib citrate ointment was compounded in the pharmacy. Tofacitinib tablets (5 mg) were crushed and mixed in white soft paraffin to produce 2% ointment. A thin layer of this ointment was applied to the treatment patch, while the control patches received the application of the vehicle twice daily. Both patches in each patient were evaluated for percentage change in severity of alopecia tool [SALT] score after 24 weeks as the primary outcome. This was graded as excellent response (>50% improvement), intermediate response (25-50%), mild response (5-25%), and no response (<5% improvement). Trichoscopy and hair pull test were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Results: The present study included 30 patients with AA having a median age of 27 years. Among 30 patients, 40% achieved excellent response (>50% change in the SALT score) over six months of treatment. The mean SALT score was significantly reduced from baseline to six months of treatment (mean [95% CI]: 4.3 [1.9-6.3]; P = 0.001). The control patch had substantially higher positive results in the final hair pull test, indicating disease activity (Treatment: 10% vs. Control: 86.7%, P < 0.001). Compared to the control patch, the prevalence of upright hair (10.0% vs. 80.0%) and terminal hair (3.3% vs. 70.0%) were significantly higher in the treatment patch (P < 0.001). No serious adverse effects were reported during the study duration. Limitations: Sample size was small and the followup was not long enough to study the full effects of tofacitinib, as well as maintenance of remission or relapse after discontinuation. Conclusion: Topical tofacitinib proved to be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment modality for AA with no adverse effects reported during this study.

Transfusion-related cost offsets and time burden in patients with myelofibrosis on momelotinib vs. danazol from MOMENTUM.

Aim: To estimate projected US-based cost and time burden for patients with myelofibrosis and anemia treated with momelotinib compared with danazol. Methods: Cost and time burden were calculated based on the transfusion status of patients in the MOMENTUM trial and estimates extracted from previous studies. Results: Reductions in transfusion associated with momelotinib are projected to result in cost and time savings compared with danazol in transfusion-dependent and transfusion-independent/requiring patients with myelofibrosis, respectively: annual medical costs ($53,143 and $46,455 per person), outpatient transfusion costs ($42,021 and $8,370 per person) and annual time savings (173 and 35 h per person). Conclusion: Fewer transfusions with momelotinib are projected to result in cost and time savings in patients with myelofibrosis and anemia compared with danazol.

Estimated cost & time savings in patients with the blood cancer myelofibrosisMyelofibrosis is a rare blood cancer often associated with bone marrow damage, too few of some types of blood cells and symptoms including tiredness, night sweating, itching and feelings of fullness and pain because of increased spleen size. Patients with anemia (too few red blood cells) may require regular blood transfusions and this is one sign that myelofibrosis is getting worse. MOMENTUM was a Phase III clinical trial showing that the drug momelotinib was safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis who were previously treated with a type of drug called a JAK inhibitor. In particular, the trial showed that momelotinib reduced the need for transfusions compared with danazol, another drug typically used to treat patients with anemia. Based on this transfusion information from MOMENTUM and other publicly available information about estimated medical costs and patients' time spent in receiving transfusions, the analysis described here shows that a reduction in the number of transfusions with momelotinib compared with danazol is estimated to lead to cost savings as well as reduced patient time spent in transfusion-related travel, preparing and waiting for transfusions and receiving and recovering from transfusions.

Efficacy and safety of deuruxolitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, in adults with alopecia areata: Results from the Phase 3 randomized, controlled trial (THRIVE-AA1).

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a hair loss disorder that can seriously impact quality of life. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including deuruxolitinib, have previously demonstrated significant hair regrowth in AA. OBJECTIVE: The Phase 3 THRIVE-AA1 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04518995) evaluated safety and efficacy of the oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor deuruxolitinib in adult patients with AA. METHODS: Patients aged 18-65 years with ≥50% hair loss were randomized to deuruxolitinib 8 mg BID, deuruxolitinib 12 mg BID, or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage of patients achieving Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20. A key secondary endpoint was percentage of satisfaction of hair patient-reported outcome (SPRO) responders. RESULTS: Significantly higher proportions of patients taking deuruxolitinib met the primary endpoint (8 mg 29.6%; 12 mg 41.5% versus placebo 0.8%). Both deuruxolitinib doses achieved significant improvements in all secondary endpoints versus placebo, including SPRO (8 mg 42.1%; 12 mg 53.0% versus placebo 4.7%). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate, consistent with other oral JAK inhibitors. LIMITATIONS: Further studies are required to understand longer-term safety, efficacy, and impact of treatment cessation. CONCLUSION: Both doses of deuruxolitinib were effective for hair regrowth. Patient satisfaction aligned with hair growth.

Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Biologic DMARDs: Results Through Week 216 from the SELECT-CHOICE Study.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) through week 216 was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-CHOICE study. METHODS: Patients with RA refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were randomized to UPA15 or abatacept (ABA) for 24 weeks. During the open-label LTE, patients on ABA switched to UPA15 at week 24, and those on UPA15 continued treatment. The safety and efficacy of continuous UPA15, and ABA to UPA15, are summarized through week 216. RESULTS: The LTE was comprised of 91.4% (n = 277/303) of patients that initially received UPA15, and 89.6% (n = 277/309) that initially received ABA. Of patients on UPA15 in the LTE (n = 547), 28.3% (n = 155/547) discontinued the study drug by week 216. Relative to other adverse events of special interest, and largely consistent with previous findings at week 24, higher rates of serious infection, COVID-19, herpes zoster, and elevated creatine phosphokinase were reported, while rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) were low. Long-term safety data with UPA through week 216 aligned with previous observations and no new safety risks were identified, including in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15. Proportions of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) < 2.6/ ≤ 3.2, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simple disease activity index (SDAI) low disease activity/remission, ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20/50/70) response criteria, and Boolean remission were maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), patient's assessment of pain, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were also maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Across all efficacy endpoints, similar results were observed in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15 versus continuous UPA15. Patients with an inadequate response to ≥ 1 prior tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (UPA15: n = 263/303, 86.8%; ABA to UPA15: n = 273/309, 88.3%) showed similar responses to the total population. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term safety profile of UPA was consistent with previous findings and the broader RA clinical program. Compared to the primary analyses at week 24, efficacy responses were maintained or further improved with UPA15 through week 216 in patients with RA. Trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03086343.

A long-term study looked at a drug named upadacitinib to treat people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease that causes joint pain and damage. The study included patients whose RA was not improved by other injectable medicines. The study compared upadacitinib with another drug called abatacept. After 24 weeks, patients who were taking abatacept switched to upadacitinib, and patients taking upadacitinib continued on upadacitinib treatment for over 4 years. The researchers looked at how well the treatments worked over the long-term and if there were any side effects. The side effects with upadacitinib treatment in this long-term study were similar to side effects reported in previous studies with upadacitinib. The researchers also found that upadacitinib helped to lessen the symptoms of RA over time and helped patients complete their daily activities and reduced their pain and tiredness. This was true for patients who switched from abatacept to upadacitinib after 24 weeks and for patients who took upadacitinib from the start of the study. Patients who had not responded to other medicines also had similar improvements with upadacitinib. In conclusion, upadacitinib can help people with RA over the long term and no new safety risks were found.

Advancing psoriasis drug delivery through topical liposomes.

Psoriasis, recognized as a chronic inflammatory skin disorder, disrupts immune system functionality. Global estimates by the World Psoriasis Day consortium indicate its impact on approximately 130 million people, constituting 4 to 5 percent of the worldwide population. Conventional drug delivery systems, mainly designed to alleviate psoriasis symptoms, fall short in achieving targeted action and optimal bioavailability due to inherent challenges such as the drug's brief half-life, instability, and a deficiency in ensuring both safety and efficacy. Liposomes, employed in drug delivery systems, emerge as highly promising carriers for augmenting the therapeutic efficacy of topically applied drugs. These small unilamellar vesicles demonstrate enhanced penetration capabilities, facilitating drug delivery through the stratum corneum layer of skin. This comprehensive review article illuminates diverse facets of liposomes as a promising drug delivery system to treat psoriasis. Addressing various aspects such as formulation strategies, encapsulation techniques, and targeted delivery, the review underscores the potential of liposomes in enhancing the efficacy and specificity of psoriasis treatments.