Enhancing robotic precision in medial UKA: Image-based robot-assisted system had higher accuracy in implant positioning than imageless robot-assisted system across 292 knees.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the degree of accuracy in implant positioning and limb alignment offered by two robot-assisted (RA) systems: an image-based robot-assisted (IBRA) versus an imageless robot-assisted (ILRA) system for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: This retrospective radiographic study included medial UKAs performed between 2011 and 2023. Radiographic measurements taken preoperatively and at 1-year postoperative control visit focusing on hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), tibial component coronal alignment relative to Cartier's angle and restoration of proper joint line (JL) height were analyzed. Outliers for postoperative measurements were defined as follows: HKA <175° or >180°, PTS <2° or >8°, >3° or <-3° alterations in Cartier's angle and ±2 mm changes in the height of the joint line. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 292 medial UKAs: 95 (32.5%) with an IBRA system and 197 (67.5%) with an ILRA system. Implant positioning and limb alignment were more accurate in the group of patients treated with IBRA, HKA (77.9% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.07), PTS (93.7% vs. 82.7%, p = 0.01), restoration of tibial varus relative to Cartier's angle (87.4% vs. 65%, p < 0.001) and restoration of JL height (81.1% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Medial UKA surgery using an IBRA system was associated with a higher degree of accuracy in implant positioning and postoperative limb alignment as compared to an ILRA system. This is a valuable contribution to help communicate the advantages of using this surgical technique and improve its reproducibility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Influence of Joint Line Level on Clinical Outcomes and Range of Motion in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Ankle arthritis leads to an elevated joint line compared to the nonarthritic ankle, as measured by the "joint line height ratio" (JLHR). Previous work has shown that the JLHR may remain elevated after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). However, the clinical impact of this has yet to be determined. This study assessed the correlation between postoperative JLHR, post-TAA range of motion (ROM), and 1-year Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. METHODS: A retrospective review of 150 patients who underwent primary TAA was performed. Preoperative and postoperative JLHR, as well as postoperative dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, and total ROM, was calculated on weightbearing radiographs at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Correlation between JLHR, post-TAA ROM, and 1-year PROMIS scores was investigated using Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression models. Interobserver reliability for the JLHR was also calculated. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for the JLHR was excellent (r = 0.98). Mean (SD) JLHR changed from 1.66 (0.45) to 1.55 (0.26) after TAA (P < .001), indicating that the joint line was lowered after TAA. An elevated joint line was correlated with decreased post-TAA dorsiflexion (r = -0.26, P < .001), total ROM (r = -0.18, P = .025), and worse 1-year PROMIS physical function (r = -0.22, P = .046), pain intensity (r = 0.22, P = .042), and pain interference (r = 0.29, P = .007). There was no correlation between the JLHR and post-TAA plantarflexion (r = -0.025, P = .76). Regression analysis identified a 0.5-degree reduction in post-TAA dorsiflexion with each 0.1-unit increase in JLHR (Coeff. = -5.13, P = .005). CONCLUSION: In this patient cohort, we found that an elevated joint line modestly correlated with decreased postoperative dorsiflexion, total ROM, and worse 1-year PROMIS scores. These data suggest that effort likely should be made toward restoring the native joint line at the time of TAA. In addition, future studies investigating the clinical outcomes after TAA may consider including a measure of joint line height, such as the JLHR, because we found it was associated with patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

A comparison of joint line height after revision total knee replacement using a rotating hinge versus a condylar revision knee system.

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to assess the effects of two differing revision total knee implants designs (condylar and rotating hinge) on joint line height. Method: The use of distal augmentation and pre and post revision radiographic joint line heights were compared in 19 condylar type knee replacements (Zimmer NexGen Legacy Constrained Condylar Knee - LCCK) and 40 LINK-Endo-rotating hinge knee replacements. Joint line and patellar heights were determined for each implant using four validated methods. For comparison within a group a two tailed paired Student's t-test was used, for comparison between the groups an unpaired, two tailed Student's t-test was used. A p value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Results: In 15 of 19 NexGen revision knee replacements distal augments were used. No distal augments were used in the LINK-Endo RHK group. In both systems there was no tendency to elevate the joint line relative to the tibia. The joint line was distalised relative to the femur in the NexGen group and proximalised in the rotating hinge knee group. Measurements using antero-posterior radiographs were found to be the most reliable method of assessing joint line height when compared to lateral radiographs. Conclusion: Both revision knee implant systems adequately restored joint line height. In condylar type knee revision implants elevation of the joint line height may be avoided through the use of distal augmentation. We found AP radiographs to be the most reliable method of accurately assessing joint line height.

Importance of the gender and preoperative knee sagittal alignment to avoid unnecessary tibial resection in TKR.

BACKGROUND: Standard resections according to the TKR manufacturers can lead to unnecessary bone resections in some patients. The objective of this study was to determine in which patients is recommended to perform a minimal tibial resection (MTR) that could restore the joint line height (JLH). METHODS: Navigation records of 108 consecutive posterior cruciate-substituting TKR performed by one surgeon were analyzed. Optimal tibial resection depth to restore the JLH (0 mm) was calculated by an algorithm. Postoperatively, the knees were distributed in two groups: those in which a MTR (depth ≤ 8 mm) would have been enough to restore the JLH and those in which a standard resection depth would have been necessary. ROC curves and Youden index were used to determine the cutoff point of the coronal and sagittal mechanical axis that predicted a MTR restoring the JLH. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with requiring an MTR. RESULTS: A MTR could be required in 20 (18.5%) knees. In the ROC curve analyses, the cutoff points that best discriminated between minimal and standard tibial resection was ≤ 3° of varus and < 2° of flexion preoperative deformity. Multivariate analysis showed that female gender and preoperative flexion < 2° were significant predictors of requiring a MTR to restore JLH. CONCLUSION: A MTR with the JLH restoration could be possible in female patients with a preoperative sagittal deformity less than 2° of flexion. Preoperative coronal alignment had no influence to discriminate when a MTR is required.

Assessing the Ankle Joint Line Level Before and After Total Ankle Arthroplasty With the "Joint Line Height Ratio".

BACKGROUND: Restoring the joint line is an important principle in total knee arthroplasty. However, the effect of joint line level on patient outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) remains unclear, as there is no established method for measuring ankle joint level in TAA. The objective of this study was to develop a reliable radiographic ankle joint line measurement method and to compare ankle joint line level measured pre-TAA, post-TAA, and in nonarthritic ankles. METHODS: A total of 112 radiographic sets were analyzed. Each set included weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of the operative ankle taken preoperatively, 1-year postoperatively, and of the contralateral ankle. Measurements of vertical intermalleolar distance (VIMD) and vertical joint line distance (VJLD) at pre-TAA, post-TAA, and of the contralateral ankle were recorded by 2 authors on 2 separate occasions. The ratio of VJLD to VIMD was defined as the joint line height ratio (JLHR). Reliability of measurements and correlation between VIMD and VJLD were assessed. Pre-TAA, nonarthritic contralateral ankle, and post-TAA JLHR were compared and considered significantly different if P <.05. RESULTS: The inter- and intrarater reliability of radiographic measurements was excellent (r > 0.9). There were strong positive correlations of VIMD and VJLD, r = 0.809 (pre-TAA)/0.756 (post-TAA), P < .001. Mean (SD) pre-TAA, nonarthritic contralateral ankle, and post-TAA JLHRs were 1.54 (0.31), 1.39 (0.26), and 1.62 (0.49), respectively. Pre- and post-TAA JLHRs were significantly higher compared to the nonarthritic contralateral ankle (P < .05). JHLR was not significantly different between pre- and post-TAA (P = .15). CONCLUSION: The JLHR was reliable and could be a clinically applicable method for assessing ankle joint line level in patients undergoing TAA. End-stage ankle arthritis demonstrated elevated joint line level compared with nonarthritic ankles, and the joint line level post-TAA remained elevated compared with nonarthritic ankles. Further studies are needed to understand the effect of joint line elevation on clinical outcomes after TAA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Changes in Femoral Posterior Condylar Offset, Tibial Posterior Slope Angle, and Joint Line Height after Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Changes in the femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO), tibial posterior slope angle (PSA), and joint line height (JLH) after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) were evaluated to determine their influence on the flexion angle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 125 CR-TKAs performed on 110 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and postoperative PCO, PSA, and JLH were compared using correlation analysis. Independent factors affecting the postoperative flexion angle of the knee were analyzed. RESULTS: The PCO was 28.2±2.0 mm (range, 24.5 to 33.1 mm) preoperatively and 26.7±1.8 mm (range, 22.2 to 31.2 mm) postoperatively (r=0.807, p<0.001). The PSA was 10.4°±4.9° (range, 1.6° to 21.2°) preoperatively and decreased to 4.9°±2.0° (2.2° to 10.7°) postoperatively (r=-0.023, p=0.800). The JLH was 16.2±3.0 mm (range, 10.2 to 27.5 mm) preoperatively and 16.1±2.6 mm (range, 11.1 to 24.8 mm) postoperatively (r=0.505, p<0.001). None of the independent factors affected the flexion angle (p>0.291). CONCLUSIONS: Although the PCO and JLH did not change significantly after CR-TKA, the PSA decreased by 5.5° with a small range of variation. Restoration of the PCO and JLH could promote optimization of knee flexion in spite of the decreased PSA after CR-TKA.

Changes in Femoral Posterior Condylar Offset, Tibial Posterior Slope Angle, and Joint Line Height after Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

PURPOSE: Changes in the femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO), tibial posterior slope angle (PSA), and joint line height (JLH) after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) were evaluated to determine their influence on the flexion angle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 125 CR-TKAs performed on 110 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and postoperative PCO, PSA, and JLH were compared using correlation analysis. Independent factors affecting the postoperative flexion angle of the knee were analyzed. RESULTS: The PCO was 28.2+/-2.0 mm (range, 24.5 to 33.1 mm) preoperatively and 26.7+/-1.8 mm (range, 22.2 to 31.2 mm) postoperatively (r=0.807, p0.291). CONCLUSIONS: Although the PCO and JLH did not change significantly after CR-TKA, the PSA decreased by 5.5degrees with a small range of variation. Restoration of the PCO and JLH could promote optimization of knee flexion in spite of the decreased PSA after CR-TKA.