Effect of Donor Warm Ischemia Time During Graft Extraction in Right Lobe Robotic Donor Hepatectomy on Recipient Outcomes - A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

One of the concerns specific to minimally invasive donor hepatectomy(MIDH) is the prolonged time required for graft extraction after completion of the donor hepatectomy(donor warm ischemic time(DWIT)). There has never been an objective evaluation of MIDH-DWIT on allograft function in living donor liver transplantation(LDLT).We evaluated the effect of DWIT following robotic donor hepatectomy(RDH) on recipient outcomes and compared them with a matched cohort of open donor hepatectomy (ODH).Demographic, perioperative and recipient's post-operative outcome data for all right lobe(RL)-RDH performed between September 2019 and July 2023 was analysed and compared with a propensity-score matched cohort(1:1) of RL-ODH from the same time period. Of a total of 103 RL-RDH and 446 RL-ODH, unmatched and Propensity-score matched analysis(1:1) revealed a significantly longer DWIT in the RDH group as compared to the ODH group (9.33±3.95 Vs 2.87±2.13, p<0.0001). This did not translate into any difference in the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary complications(BC), major morbidity or overall 1-& 3-month survival. ROC curve analysis threshold for DWIT-EAD was 9min (AUROC:0.67,sensitivity=80%,specificity=53.8%).We show that prolonged DWIT within an acceptable range in RDH does not have deleterious effects on short-term recipient outcomes. Further long-term studies are required to confirm our findings especially with regards to non-anastomotic BC.

A single center analysis of long-term outcomes and survival related risk factors in liver retransplantation.

Background: Liver retransplant is the only option to save a patient with liver graft failure. However, it is controversial due to its poor survival outcome compared to primary transplantation. Insufficient deceased organ donation in Taiwan leads to high waitlist mortality. Hence, living-donor grafts offer a valuable alternative for retransplantation. This study aims to analyze the single center's outcome in living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) as well as the survival related confounding risk factors. Methods: This is a single center retrospective study including 32 adults who underwent liver retransplantation (re-LT) from June 2002 to April 2020. The cohort was divided into a re-LDLT and a re-DDLT group and survival outcomes were analyzed. Patient outcomes over different periods, the effect of timing on survival, and multivariate analysis for risk factors were also demonstrated. Results: Of the 32 retransplantations, the re-LDLT group (n=11) received grafts from younger donors (31.3 vs. 43.75 years, P=0.016), with lower graft weights (688 vs. 1,457.2 g, P<0.001) and shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (45 vs. 313 min, P<0.001). The 5-year survival was significantly better in the re-LDLT group than in the re-DDLT group (100% vs. 70.8%, P=0.02). This difference was adjusted when only retransplantation after 2010 was analyzed. Further analysis showed that the timing of retransplantation (early vs. late) did not affect patient survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) and intraoperative blood transfusion were related to poor long-term survival. Conclusions: Retransplantation with living donor graft demonstrated good long-term outcomes with acceptable complications to both recipient and donor. It may serve as a choice in areas lacking deceased donors. The timing of retransplantation did not affect the long-term survival. Further effort should be made to reduce WIT and massive blood transfusion as they contributed to poor survival after retransplantation.

Expert opinion on the use of fiberoptic bronchospe to check the insertion depth of the left-sided double-lumen tube.

Left-sided double-lumen tube (LDLT) is commonly used to achieve one lung isolation in most thoracic surgical procedures. Traditionally, the LDLT is blindly placed using direct or video laryngoscopy. In this brief report, we highlight the importance of using our novel insertion depth formula to predict the appropriate LDLT insertion depth and demonstrate the current evidence supporting the efficacy of the formula. Also, we will discuss two relatively new devices of LDLTs: one with an embedded camera at the distal end of the tracheal lumen and the other with a carinal cuff between the bronchial cuff and the tracheal lumen in reducing the incidence of too deep inserted LDLT. We advocate that using our novel formula and these two new devices may reduce but not eliminate the need for FOB to check the insertion depth of LDLT.

Insights from Seoul National University Hospital's experience: a systematic review of pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy progression.

Following its initial execution in November 2015, pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) has gained acceptance as a conventional practice at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH). It is noteworthy that a significant proportion of cases entail full right hepatectomies, which are acknowledged to be technically demanding. As expertise and knowledge have been accrued, the pure laparoscopic technique has been extended to encompass liver recipients as a viable option in SNUH. The aim of this review is to present the developmental progression of PLDH, with a focus on pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH), at SNUH. This includes the standardization process, which can be achieved by sharing the hospital's accumulated experience and previous reports. Various types of graft, including full right, left, left lateral section, and monosegment, were procured by pure laparoscopic technique. The criteria for selection were expanded to include donors with variations in the anatomy of the portal vein and bile duct. Additionally, the procedure of PLDRH was determined to be safe and viable for donors with high body mass index and larger graft weight. In conclusion, this review demonstrates the alterations implemented throughout our evolution from restricted to inclusive criteria for donor selection, leading to a complete shift from open surgery to pure laparoscopic procedures in donor hepatectomy and eventually pure laparoscopic living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in recipient.

Safety and efficacy of extended thrombophilia screening directed venous thromboembolic events (VTE) prophylaxis in live liver donors: do we really need extended thrombophilia screening routinely?

Background and aims: The study aimed to determine the prevalence of hereditary thrombophilia, and stratify its severity among live liver donors in Pakistan. Also, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of thrombophilia profile testing directed venous thromboembolic events (VTE) prophylaxis while balancing bleeding risk and the need for routine thrombophilia testing before live liver donation among living donor candidates. Materials and methods: Protein S (PS), protein C (PC), anti-thrombin (AT) III, and anti-phospholipid antibody panel (APLA) levels were measured in 567 potential donor candidates. Donors were divided into normal, borderline and high-risk groups based on Caprini score. The safety endpoints were VTE occurrence, bleeding complications or mortality. Results: Among 567 donors, 21 (3.7%) were deficient in protein C, and 14 (2.5%) were deficient in anti-thrombin-III. IgM and IgG. Anti-phospholipids antibodies were positive in 2/567 (0.4%) and 2/567 (0.4%), respectively. IgM and IgG lupus anticoagulant antibodies were positive in 3/567 (0.5%) and 3/567 (0.5%), respectively. VTE events, bleeding complications and postoperative living donors liver transplantation-related complications were comparable among the three donor groups (P>0.05). One donor in the normal donor group developed pulmonary embolism, but none of the donors in either borderline or high-risk group developed VTE. The mean length of ICU and total hospital stay were comparable. No donor mortality was observed in all donor groups. Conclusions: Due to thrombophilia testing directed VTE prophylaxis, VTE events were comparable in normal, borderline and high-risk thrombophilia donor groups, but more evaluations are required to determine the lower safe levels for various thrombophilia parameters including PC, PS and AT-III before surgery among living donor candidates.

Successful adult domino living donor liver transplantation in methylmalonic acidemia: case report.

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is a therapeutic option in multiple inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs), including methylmalonic acidemia (MMA), as LT reduces the risk of acute metabolic decompensations and long-term complications associated with these diseases. In certain IMDs, such as maple syrup urine disease (MSUD), domino liver transplant (DLT) is an accepted and safe method which expands the donor pool. However, only one adult case of DLT using an MMA donor liver has been reported; outcome and safety are still unknown and questioned. Case Description: In this case report, we describe our experience with DLT using MMA livers. Two adult MMA patients underwent living donor liver transplant (LDLT); their MMA livers were consecutively transplanted into two patients on the liver transplant waiting list who had limited chance of receiving a liver transplant in the short term due to their low model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores. No severe peri- or postoperative complications occurred, however the recipients of the MMA livers biochemically now have mild MMA. Conclusions: DLT using MMA grafts is a feasible strategy to treat end-stage liver disease and expand the donor organ pool. However, the recipient of the MMA domino liver may develop mild MMA which could affect quality of life, and long-term safety remains unclear. Further long-term of outcomes for domino recipients of MMA livers, focusing on quality of life and any metabolic complications of transplantation are needed to better define the risks and benefits.

Early Graft Failure After Living-Donor Liver Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been increasing in the USA. While data exist on longer-term patient and graft outcomes, a contemporary analysis of short-term outcomes is needed. AIM: Evaluate short-term (30-day) graft failure rates and identify predictors associated with these outcomes. METHODS: Adult (≥ 18) LDLT recipients from 01/2004 to 12/2021 were analyzed from the United States Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Graft status at 30 days was assessed with graft failure defined as retransplantation or death. Comparison of continuous and categorical variables was performed and a multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors of early graft failure. RESULTS: During the study period, 4544 LDLTs were performed with a graft failure rate of 3.4% (155) at 30 days. Grafts from male donors (aOR: 0.63, CI 0.44-0.89), right lobe grafts (aOR: 0.40, CI 0.27-0.61), recipients aged > 60 years (aOR: 0.52, CI 0.32-0.86), and higher recipient albumin (aOR: 0.73, CI 0.57-0.93) were associated with superior early graft outcomes, whereas Asian recipient race (vs. White; aOR: 3.75, CI 1.98-7.10) and a history of recipient PVT (aOR: 2.7, CI 1.52-4.78) were associated with inferior outcomes. LDLTs performed during the most recent 2016-2021 period (compared to 2004-2009 and 2010-2015) resulted in significantly superior outcomes (aOR: 0.45, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that while short-term adult LDLT graft failure is uncommon, there are opportunities for optimizing outcomes by prioritizing right lobe donation, improving candidate nutritional status, and careful pre-transplant risk assessment of candidates with known PVT. Notably, a period effect exists whereby increased LDLT experience in the most recent era correlated with improved outcomes.

Impact of electrical muscle stimulation on serum myostatin level and maintenance of skeletal muscle mass in patients undergoing living-donor liver transplantation: Single-center controlled trial.

AIM: Sarcopenia is reportedly associated with a poor prognosis in patients who undergo living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), most of whom are not able to tolerate muscle strengthening exercise training. Myostatin is one of the myokines and a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth. The clinical feasibility of an electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) system, which exercises muscle automatically by direct electrical stimulation, has been reported. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of perioperative application of SIXPAD, which is a type of EMS system, with reference to the serum myostatin and sarcopenia in LDLT patients. METHOD: Thirty patients scheduled for LDLT were divided into a SIXPAD group (n = 16) and a control group (n = 14). In the SIXPAD group, EMS was applied to the thighs twice daily. The serum myostatin was measured in samples obtained before use of SIXPAD and immediately before LDLT. The psoas muscle index (PMI) at the level of the third lumbar vertebra and the quadriceps muscle area were compared on computed tomography images before use of SIXPAD and 1 month after LDLT. RESULTS: The preoperative serum myostatin was found to be higher in LDLT patients than in healthy volunteers and EMS significantly reduced the serum myostatin. Electrical muscle stimulation prevented a postoperative reduction not only in the area of the quadriceps muscles but also in the PMI despite direct stimulation of the thigh muscles. CONCLUSION: Stimulation of muscles by EMS decreases the serum myostatin and helps to maintain skeletal muscle in patients who have undergone LDLT.

Treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in the transplant era: Focusing on the Japan criteria.

PURPOSE: To clarify the Japan criteria (JC), as proposed in 2019, in order to identify the most appropriate treatment methods for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and assess the feasibility of pre-living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) downstaging within these criteria. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 169 LDLT patients with HCC recurrence. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of the factors contributing to HCC recurrence after LDLT and clarified the post-transplant outcomes of pre-LDLT downstaging. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analysis identified beyond the JC (p = 0.0018) and a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 2.01 (p = 0.029) as independent risk factors. Patients who met the JC had significantly higher recurrence-free and overall survival rates after LDLT (p < 0.0001) than those who did not (p = 0.0002). The post-transplant outcomes of patients within the JC after downstaging were significantly better than those of patients beyond the JC (p = 0.034) and equivalent to those within the JC without downstaging. CONCLUSION: Even for HCC recurrence, the JC could play an important role in deciding on the best treatment strategy, and downstaging within the JC had good post-transplant outcomes.

Peri-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potential rescue therapy for patients with acute cardiopulmonary dysfunction refractory to conventional treatment. In this study, we described the clinical profiles and outcomes of adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients who received ECMO support during the peri-operative period. Methods: From June 1994 to December 2020, eleven out of the 1,812 LDLTs performed at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital required ECMO support: six for respiratory failure, three for cardiogenic shock, and two for refractory septic shock. Comparison between the survivor and non-survivor groups was made. Results: The survival rate for liver transplantation (LT) patients on ECMO support is 36.4%-40% in adults and 33.3% in pediatrics, while the survival rate per indication is as follows: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (50%), cardiogenic shock (33.3%), and sepsis (0%). Shorter durations of LT-to-ECMO and pre-ECMO mechanical ventilation were observed in the survivor group. On the other hand, we observed persistently elevated total bilirubin levels in non-survivors, while none of the survivors had aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels >1,000 U/L. A higher proportion of non-survivors were on concurrent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Conclusions: Our experience has proven ECMO's utility during the peri-operative period for both adult and pediatric LDLT patients, more specifically for indications other than septic shock. Further studies are needed to better understand the factors leading to poor outcomes in order to identify patients who will more likely benefit from ECMO.

Emergency Department Frequentation and Unscheduled Visits of Liver Transplant Patients: Ten Years Experience in Tertiary Care Center, Saudi Arabia.

Introduction and objectives Liver transplantation and its indications represent an increased burden on patients' health. This can be represented in a variety of ways, such as in emergency visits, unscheduled clinic visits, and unanticipated admissions. This study aims to analyze emergency department (ED) visits, the most common presenting complaints, and the outcomes of those visits. Methods A retrospective observational study was performed in which electronic medical records were reviewed for all patients who underwent liver transplantation and presented to the emergency department between October 2011 and October 2021. The following data were collected: demographics, comorbidities, liver transplant features, and emergency department visit data and outcomes. Recurrent visits were assessed and labeled as first, second, third, fourth, and fifth or more. Results A total of 699 patients and 5,225 visits were included in the analysis. Living donors accounted for 80% of all transplants. The mean post-operative length of stay was 22.6 ± 17.8. The majority of patients (74%) had at least one comorbidity, with diabetes (47%), hypertension (31%), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (16%) being the commonest comorbidities; however, comorbidities were not associated with an increased risk of emergency department visits. Out of the 5,225 visits to the emergency department, 2,265 (41%) were within the first year. Emergency department visits in the first seven days after discharge amounted to 22% of total first visits. By 30 days, six months, and one year, they increased to 46%, 83%, and 91%, respectively. Living donor recipients had an average of 7.3 ED visits as compared to deceased donor recipients, who had an average of 8.4 ED visits. The most common presenting complaints were gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (18%), infectious disease symptoms (9%), and respiratory symptoms (8%). There were a total of 296 patients who were readmitted at least once since discharge after liver transplantation. Conclusion The majority of first-time presentations to ED occurred in the first year post-transplant, marking this time period as critical for liver transplant patients. Our study also highlighted the continual presentations of liver transplant patients to the ED a few years post-transplant. This requires close scrutiny of the main causes of such presentations as well as comparison with other transplant cases to identify whether they are specific to liver transplants or not.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Do We Still Need Microscope Surgery in Hepatic Artery Anastomosis to Decrease the Incidence of Complications in Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is the most serious vascular complication after liver transplantation (LT). Moreover, in comparison to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), hepatic artery (HA) anastomosis is more challenging in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with a lot of controversial topics about the use of microscopic surgery. We aimed to compare the use of microscopic and loupe surgery in HA anastomosis in adult and pediatric LDLT to decrease the incidence of vascular complications. We searched PubMed, Scopes, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies from inception to April 2023 and a systematic review and a meta-analysis were done. According to our eligibility criteria, 10 studies with a total of 1939 patients were included. In comparison to microscopic surgery, loupe anastomosis has a similar incidence of HAT (thrombosis, risk ratio (RR) = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.26-3.48, P = 0.95). In addition to that, no significant difference was detected between the two types in terms of stenosis, decreased blood flow and hospital stay (decreased blood flow, RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.01-86.65, P = 0.88), (stenosis, RR = 1.81, 95% CI = 0.19-17.21, P = 0.60), (hospital stay, mean deviation (MD) = 1.16, 95% CI = -3.79-6.11, P = 0.65). However, the anastomotic time was longer in the case of microscopic surgery (anastomotic time, MD = 24.09, 95% CI = 7.79-40.39, P = 0.004). With an equal incidence of complications and longer anastomotic time, there is no added benefit of the routine use of microscopic surgery in HA anastomosis in LDLT.

Duct-to-Duct Anastomosis Versus Bilioenteric Anastomosis for Pediatrics Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

With an incidence exceeding 30%, biliary complications after pediatric liver transplantation remain a great challenge. In addition, the database includes numerous controversial papers about the safety of duct-to-duct anastomosis compared to Reux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We aim to compare the two techniques in pediatric LDLT by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. PUBMED, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies from 1989 to October 2022. According to our eligibility criteria, seven articles (561 pediatric LDLT) were included in our study. On one hand, DD anastomosis is associated with a higher rate of biliary stricture in comparison to RYHJ (OR: 2.47, 95% CI = 1.20-5.09, P = 0.01; I2 = 12%). On the other hand, the incidence of cholangitis was higher in RYHJ (OR: 0.10 95% CI = 0.01- 0.84, P = 0.03; I2 = 0%). However, there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of complications, leakage and mortality between the two groups (overall incidence of complication OR: 1.12, 95% CI = 0.34-3.68, P = 0.86; I2 = 62%), (Leakage OR: 2.22, 95% CI = 0.79-6.23, P = 0.13; I2 = 18%) and (Mortality OR: 2.53, 95% CI = 0.61-10.57, P = 0.30; I2 = 0%). In conclusion, with a lower incidence of cholangitis, an equal overall incidence of biliary complication, and the possibility of RY conversion in case of stricture, DD anastomosis offers a feasible, safe, and more physiological alternative to RYHJ for pediatric LDLT.

Benefit of living donor liver transplantation in graft survival for extremely high model for end-stage liver disease score ≥35.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Living liver donation with high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was discouraged despite organ shortage. This study aimed to compare graft survival between living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients with extremely high-MELD (score of ≥35). METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, 359 patients who underwent liver transplantation with a MELD score ≥35 were enrolled. We compared graft survival between LDLT and DDLT after propensity score matching (PSM) and performed subgroup analysis according to donor type. RESULTS: After PSM, there was no statistical difference in graft survival between the LDLT and DDLT groups (p = .466). Old age, acute on chronic liver failure, re-transplantation, preoperative intensive care unit stay and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the operation were risk factors for graft failure (p = .046, .005, .032, .015 and .001, respectively). Biliary complications were more common in the LDLT group (p = .021), while viral infection, postoperative uncontrolled ascites, and postoperative hemodialysis were more common in the DDLT group (p = .002, .018, and .027, respectively). In the LDLT group, acute chronic liver failure, intraoperative RBC transfusion, and early postoperative complications were risk factors for graft failure (p = .007, <.001, and .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that LDLT is not inferior to DDLT in graft survival if appropriate risk evaluation is performed in cases of extremely high-MELD scores. This result will help overcome organ shortages in high-MELD liver transplantation.

Comparing High- and Low-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Living-Donor Liver Transplantation to Determine Clinical Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (CHALICE Study).

INTRODUCTION: Various studies have demonstrated that low-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients have better outcomes with improved patient survival than deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. LDLT recipients gain the most from being transplanted at MELD <25-30; however, some existing data have outlined that LDLT may provide equivalent outcomes in high-MELD and low-MELD patients, although the term "high" MELD is arbitrarily defined in the literature and various cut-off scores are outlined between 20 and 30, although most commonly, the dividing threshold is 25. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare LDLT in high-MELD with that in low-MELD recipients to determine patient survival and graft survival, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications. METHODS: Following PROSPERO registration CRD-42021261501, a systematic database search was conducted for the published literature between 1990 and 2021 and yielded a total of 10 studies with 2183 LT recipients; 490 were HM-LDLT recipients and 1693 were LM-LDLT recipients. RESULTS: Both groups had comparable mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years post-transplant (5-year HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.79-1.79; p-value 0.40) and graft survival (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.72, 1.63; p-value 0.71). No differences were observed in the rates of major morbidity, hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary complications, intra-abdominal bleeding, wound infection and rejection; however, the HM-LDLT group had higher risk for pulmonary infection, abdominal fluid collection and prolonged ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: The high-MELD LDLT group had similar patient and graft survival and morbidities to the low-MELD LDLT group, despite being at higher risk for pulmonary infection, abdominal fluid collection and prolonged ICU stay. The data, primarily sourced from high-volume Asian centers, underscore the feasibility of living donations for liver allografts in high-MELD patients. Given the rising demand for liver allografts, it is sensible to incorporate these insights into U.S. transplant practices.

An Approach to Anesthetic Management of Venous Anomalies and Outflow Reconstruction in Liver Transplants.

Hepatic venous outflow is a pivotal factor in liver transplant. However, venous anomalies and the potential for hepatic venous congestion continue to remain major points of concern to ensure the viability of transplanted livers and maximize regenerative capacity. We present a 66-year-old patient undergoing liver transplantation who was found to have anomalous venous drainage requiring venous anastomoses. To ensure adequate venous flow and minimize the possibility of graft congestion and liver dysfunction, the anesthetic management of the patient's hemodynamic status was of utmost importance. The use of osmotic diuretics and intraoperative sonography was used to ensure adequate perfusion.

Exploring safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Thromboembolic complications remain a significant concern in postoperative patients, particularly those who have undergone liver transplantation. Warfarin has been the standard oral anticoagulant. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have several advantages over warfarin, including rapid onset of action and standardized dose guidelines. We aimed to assess the safety of rivaroxaban in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. METHODS: This study was a single-center, retrospective descriptive analysis of LDLT recipients who received rivaroxaban between December 2020 and April 2022. A total of 27 recipients received rivaroxaban postoperatively. Liver function tests, immunosuppression levels, serum creatinine, and INR were recorded before the initiation of rivaroxaban and then on post-therapy days 1, 7, 14, 28, 90, and 180. RESULTS: Among the 27 recipients receiving rivaroxaban postoperatively, portal venous thrombosis was the most prevalent indication for anticoagulation (44.4%), followed by Budd-Chiari syndrome (29.6%). Nine patients had a twofold increase in either ALT or AST values, two of whom were treated for biliary strictures and the others for rejection. Eighteen patients were given tacrolimus, and eight were on cyclosporine, with one patient switched from tacrolimus to cyclosporine due to insufficient therapeutic levels. There were no incidents of bleeding or re-thrombosis during the 180-day follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban may be a safe and effective alternative in LDLT recipients with no significant adverse incidents. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and determine this population's optimal dose and duration of rivaroxaban therapy.