[First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with brain metastases]. / CBNPC sans addictions oncogéniques métastatique cérébral d'emblée : place de l'immunothérapie.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy. STATE OF THE ART: NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. PERSPECTIVES: The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of brain oligometastases.

The management of patients with brain oligometastases is complex and relies on specific reasoning compared to extracranial oligometastases. The levels of evidence are still low because patients with brain oligometastases are frequently excluded from randomized clinical trials. Stereotactic radiotherapy should be preferred in this indication over whole brain irradiation, both for patients with metastases in place and for those who have undergone surgery. The decision of local treatment and its timing must be a multidisciplinary reflection taking into account the histological and molecular characteristics of the tumor as well as the intracranial efficacy of the prescribed systemic treatments. Great caution must be observed when using stereotactic radiotherapy and concomitant systemic treatments because interactions are still poorly documented. We present the recommendations of the French society of radiation oncology on the management of brain oligometastatic patients with radiotherapy.

Clinical trials that will change practices: News in palliative radiotherapy.

Palliative radiotherapy is used to alleviate cancer-related symptoms. Symptomatic responses to palliative radiotherapy may however take several weeks, meaning that patients need to survive long enough to derive a real benefit. Oncologists can be optimistic when estimating survival for patients with advanced cancer and as a consequence some patients receiving palliative radiotherapy die before experiencing any gain. Models of patient survival have limited accuracy, particularly for predicting whether patients will die within the next 30 days. Dedicated rapid access palliative radiotherapy clinics, in which patients are assessed, simulated and treated on the same day, reduce the number of patient visits to the radiation oncology department and hence the burden on the patient as well as costs. Teleconsultation and advanced practice nurses can play a crucial role in providing rapid access to palliative radiotherapy in a dedicated palliative radiotherapy service. Single-fraction palliative radiotherapy should be offered to eligible patients if they are able to attend treatment and could potentially benefit from symptom palliation, irrespective of predicted life expectancy. Technical and organizational innovations have been proposed in order to dispense with the computed tomography scanner by carrying out the dosimetry on a recent diagnostic scanner or a magnetic resonance imaging scanner with integrated linear acceleration system. Stereotactic body radiation therapy makes it possible to envisage greater and more lasting analgesic benefits in patients with painful bone metastasis and good prognosis. Flash radiotherapy remains at the preclinical stage.

Metastasis-directed radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer failured under TKI: A case report and literature review.

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have revolutionized the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (ALKr-NSCLC), radiotherapy (RT) still plays an essential role for treatment of both intracranial and extracranial metastases, particularly for patients experienced a TKI-failure. We reported the case of a 38-year-old woman with metastatic ALKr-NSCLC who received whole-brain radiotherapy (RT) for multiple brain metastases (BMs), initially. After RT, alectinib was initiated and the patient had a good clinico-radiological response in both intracranial and extracranial regions. However, intracranial progression was developed and, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was applied to the four progressed BMs. Two months after SRS, all BMs disappeared. While patient was using alectinib, a recurrent lung lesion, a hilar lymph node and bone metastasis were detected. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was applied to all metastatic sites and, alectinib was continued again. Three months after SBRT, a complete response was obtained. She has been alive with the initial systemic therapy agent for more than 4years without evidence of neither disease nor toxicity. SRS/SBRT may eradicate the TKI-resistant tumoral clones and it may prevent switching the systemic therapy, even if there is a failure.

Third whole-brain radiation therapy for multiple brain metastases. Should it be considered in selected patients?

Whole brain reirradiation for the treatment of multiple brain metastases has shown promising results. However, concerns remain over the possible neurotoxic effects of the cumulative dose as well as the questionable radiosensitivity of recurrent metastases. A second reirradiation of the whole brain is ordinarily performed in our department for palliative purposes in patients presenting with multiple metastatic brain progression. For this study, an investigational third whole brain reirradiation has been administered to highly selected patients to obtain disease control and delay progression. Clinical outcomes and neurological toxicity were also evaluated.

Long duration of immunotherapy before radiosurgery might improve intracranial control of melanoma brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Despite significant advances that have been made in management of metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint therapy, optimal timing of combination immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery is unknown. We have reported toxicity and efficiency outcomes of patients treated with concurrent immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2016, we analyzed 62 consecutive patients presenting 296 melanoma brain metastases, treated with gamma-knife and receiving concurrent immune checkpoint therapy with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 within the 12 weeks of SRS procedure. Median follow-up time was 18 months (mo) (13-22). Minimal median dose delivered was 18 gray (Gy), with a median volume per lesion of 0.219 cm3. RESULTS: The 1-year control rate per irradiated lesion was 89% (CI 95%: 80.41-98.97). Twenty-seven patients (43.5%) developed distant brain metastases after a median time of 7.6 months (CI 95% 1.8-13.3) after gamma-knife. In multivariate analysis, positive predictive factors for intracranial tumor control were: delay since the initiation of immunotherapy exceeding 2 months before gamma-knife procedure (P=0.003) and use of anti-PD1 (P=0.006). Median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (CI 95%: 11-NR). Total irradiated tumor volume<2.1 cm3 was a positive predictive factor for overall survival (P=0.003). Ten patients (16.13%) had adverse events following irradiation, with four grade≥3. Predictive factors of all grade toxicity were: female gender (P=0.001) and previous treatment with MAPK (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: A long duration of immune checkpoint therapy before stereotactic radiosurgery might improve intracranial tumor control, but this relationship and its ideal timing need to be assessed in prospective trials.

A new prognostic model for brain metastases of specific primary tumors with stereotactic radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) was widely used in brain metastases (BM), especially in oligometastases. It is imperative to develop a new prognostic score to predict the overall survival (OS) of brain metastases based on prognostic factors for specific primary tumors. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred and ninety-seven patients were involved in the training cohort to develop a new prognostic score to predict the overall survival (OS) of brain metastases for specific primary tumors. Independent prognostic factors were confirmed using a Cox regression model. The score was developed based on clinical prognostic factors of OS with Cox proportional hazards model. The result was validated in another cohort with 56 participants to evaluate the performance of the score. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven patients with 329 brain metastases received SRT. For NSCLC, the significant prognostic factors were extracranial metastases, target therapy and number of brain metastases. For gastrointestinal cancer, the significant prognostic factors were target therapy and number of brain metastases. CONCLUSION: The prognostic factors scores were varied by the histologic types which can be used to efficiently stratify for selected patients with brain-metastasis.

Hypofractionated postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for large resected brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present retrospective study was to report outcomes after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for resected brain metastases (BM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed results of patients with resected BM treated with postoperative HSRT (3×7.7Gy to the prescription isodose 70%) between May 2013 and June 2020. Local control (LC), distant brain control (DBC), overall survival (OS), leptomeningeal disease relapse (LMDR), and radiation necrosis (RN) occurrence were reported. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with 23 brain cavities were included. Karnofsky Performance status (KPS) was≥70 in 77.3%. Median preoperative diameter was 37mm [21.0-75.0] and median planning target volume (PTV) was 23 cm3 [9.9-61.6]. Median time from surgery to SRT was 69 days [7-101] and 48% of patients had a local relapse on pre-SRT imaging. Median follow-up was 17.5 months [1.6-95.9]. One and two-year LC rates were 60.9 and 52.2% respectively. One and 2-year DBC rates were 45.5 and 40.9%. Median OS was 16.5 months. Four patients (18.2%) presented LMDR during follow-up. RN occurred in 6 patients (27.2%). Three factors were associated with OS: ECOG-PS (P=0.009), KPS (P=0.04), cystic or solid nature of the metastasis before surgery (P=0.037). Several factors were related to RN occurrence: PTV diameter and volume, Normal brain V21, V21 and V24 isodoses volumes. CONCLUSION: HSRT is the most widely used scheme for larger brain cavities after surgery. The optimal dose and scheme remain to be defined as well as the optimal delay between postoperative SRT and surgery. Dose escalation may be necessary, especially in case of subtotal resection.

Radionecrosis after repeated courses of radiotherapy under stereotactic conditions for brain metastases: Analysis of clinical and dosimetric data from a retrospective cohort of 184 patients.

PURPOSE: Between 10 and 40% of patients with cancer will develop one or more brain metastases (BMs). Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is part of the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of de novo or recurrent BM. Its main interest is to delay whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), which may cause cognitive toxicity. However, SRT is not exempt from long-term toxicity, and the most widely known SRT is radionecrosis (RN). The objective of this study was to analyze the occurrence of RN per BM and per patient. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, data from 184 patients treated for 915 BMs by two to six SRT sessions for local or distant brain recurrence without previous or intercurrent WBRT were retrospectively reviewed. RN was examined on trimestral follow-up MRI and potentially confirmed by surgery or nuclear medicine. For each BM and SRT session plan, summation V12Gy, V14Gy, V21Gy and V23Gy isodoses were collected. Volumes of intersections were created between the 12Gy isodose at the first SRT and the 18Gy isodose of the following SRT (V18-12Gy). RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, 23.0% of patients presented RN, and 6.3% of BM presented RN. Median follow-up of BM was 13.3 months (95%CI 18.3-20.8). The median interval between BM irradiation and RN was 8.7 months (95% CI 9.2-14.7). Six-, 12- and 24-month RN-free survival rates per BM were 75%, 54% and 29%, respectively. The median RN-free survival per patient was 15.3 months (95% CI 13.6-18.1). In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of RN per BM was statistically associated with local reirradiation (P<0.001) and the number of SRTs (P<0.001). In univariate analysis, the occurrence of RN per patient was statistically associated with the sum of all V18-12Gy (P=0.02). No statistical association was found in multivariate analysis. A sum of all V18-12Gy of less than 1.5ml was associated with a 14.6% risk of RN, compared with 35.6% when the sum of all V18-12Gy was superior to 1.5ml. The sum of all V18-12Gy larger than 1.5ml was associated with a 74% specificity and 53% sensitivity of RN (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on these results, a small number of BMs show RN during repeated SRT for local or distant recurrent BMs. Local reirradiation was the most predictive factor of brain RN. A V18-12Gy larger than 7.6ml in the case of local reirradiation or larger than 1.5ml in proximity reirradiation were prognostic factors of RN. The more BM patients need radiation therapy, and the longer they survive after irradiation, the higher their individual risk of developing RN.

Radiation therapy for brain metastases.

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on radiation therapy for the management of brain metastases. It has evolved in recent years and has become more complex. As the life expectancy of patients has increased and retreatments have become more frequent, side effects must be absolutely avoided. Cognitive side effects must in particular be prevented, and the most modern radiation therapy techniques must be used systematically. New prognostic classifications specific to the primary tumour of patients, advances in imaging and radiation therapy technology and new systemic therapeutic strategies, are making treatment more relevant. Stereotactic radiation therapy has supplanted whole-brain radiation therapy both for patients with metastases in place and for those who underwent surgery. Hippocampus protection is possible with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Its relevance in terms of cognitive functioning should be more clearly demonstrated but the requirement for its use is constantly increasing. New targeted cancer treatment therapies based on the nature of the primitive have complicated the notion of the place and timing of radiation therapy and the discussion during multidisciplinary care meeting to indicate the best sequences is becoming a challenging issue as data on the interaction between treatments remain to be documented. In the end, although aimed at patients in the palliative phase, the management of brain metastases is one of the locations for which technical reflection is the most challenging and treatment become increasingly personalized.

Aspects cliniques : Cancers HER2 et atteinte du système nerveux central, que faire en 2021 ?: Central nervous system metastases from HER2 positive breast cancers: what to do in 2021?

Metastatic breast cancer is the second most common cause of brain metastasis (BM), and this problem is particularly marked for the amplified HER2 subtype (HER2+), with a cumulative incidence reaching up to 49 % in the ER-/HER2+ subgroup. Literature review shows that therapeutic progress has been major since the marketing of systemic anti-HER2+ treatments, with life expectancies now relatively unaffected by brain development. The recommended treatments are, on the one hand, specific treatment for brain development and, on the other hand, appropriate systemic treatment. Regarding local treatments, we will always favor surgery when possible, especially for large metastases, and stereotaxic radiotherapy, possibly iterative. One should be wary of whole brain irradiation which has never been shown to improve overall survival, but which is clearly associated with more cognitive toxicities. All the systemic anti-HER2 treatments currently on the market have shown efficacy on BM from HER2+ breast cancer and must therefore be chosen above all on the basis of their potential activity on the systemic disease at the time of cerebral evolution. If BM evolution happen without concomitant systemic progression, and local treatment can control it, it is not recommended to change the current medical treatment. Finally, randomized clinical studies opened to patients with active brain disease are starting to be published. The first of them showed the benefit of the triple combination tucatinib-trastuzumab-capecitabine in this context.

Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases using three fractions: A single-centre retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) has become a standard of care for patients with a limited number of brain metastases (BM). An increasing number of linear accelerators (LA) are able to accurately perform HFSRT including VersaHD® (Elekta®) LA. The main aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes of BM treated by HFSRT using 3×7.7Gy on 70% isodose line in terms of local control (LC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2016 and October 2018, all patients suffering from histologically-proven primary with one or several newly diagnosed BM treated by HFSRT were retrospectively included and evaluated. Patients who had received prior treatment by neurosurgery or cerebral radiotherapy were excluded. RESULTS: Among 44 patients, 61 BM were treated. With a median follow-up of 31.9 months, LC rates at 6 and 12 months were 93.2% and 90.9, respectively. Single-BM was independently predictive of LC (P=0.025) and overall survival (P=0.013). Acute toxicity rates were acceptable: 65.9% of patients had grade 1 and 2 and no acute grade 3 toxicity according to the NCI-CTCAE (version 5.0). Regarding delayed toxicity, one case (2.3%) of radionecrosis was confirmed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. CONCLUSION: In our single-centre retrospective analysis, BM treatment by HFSRT delivered in three fractions showed a 12-month LC rate of 90.9% without major toxicities, which suggests safety and efficiency of this technique. However, longer-term follow-up and prospective studies are still needed to confirm these results.

Toxicity and time lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is the standard treatment for brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma, mostly in combination with immunotherapy. The objective was to retrospectively evaluate the influence of the time-lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy on toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2019, 59 patients treated with SRT for 103 brain metastases of NSCLC (60%) and melanoma (40%) in combination with concomitant immunotherapy (≤30 days) were included. The prescribed dose was 20Gy/1f or 33Gy/3f at the isocentre and 14Gy or 23.1Gy (70%) respectively at the PTV envelope (PTV=GTV+2mm). The mean tumour diameter was 14mm (4-52mm). The immunotherapies used were anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. The 103 metastases were classified into 3 groups according to the time-lapse between instatement of immunotherapy and instatement of SRT for the patient concerned: 7 (7%) in group A (≤7 days), 38 (37%) in group B (7 to 14 days) and 58 (56%) in group C (14 to 30 days). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 10.1 months. The median overall survival was 11.5 months for NSCLC and 12.5 months for melanoma. The percentage of local control (LC) at one year was 65.1% (93.6% for NSCLC and 26.5% for melanoma). The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of LC (P=0.86), while the histology was (P<0.001). The proportion of grade≥3 toxicities was 5.1%, and that of radionecrosis was 9.7% (among these patients, 80% were non-symptomatic): 0%, 13.1% and 8.6% for groups A, B and C respectively. The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of toxicity. Only tumour volume was a significant predictive factor (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: The time lapse between immunotherapy and SRT does not influence brain toxicity. The tumour volume remains the main factor.

A new model outperforming RPA and DS-GPA scores for individualized survival prediction of patients following whole brain irradiation for brain metastasis.

PURPOSE: Survival after whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with multiple brain metastases (BM) is currently predicted by group-based scoring systems with limited usability for decision. We aimed to develop a more relevant individualized predictive model than Radiation Therapy Oncology Group - Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RTOG-RPA) and Diagnosis - Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) for patients with limited life-expectancy. METHODS: Based on a Discovery cohort of patients undergoing WBRT, multivariable piecewise Cox regression models with time cut-offs at 1 and 3 months were developed to predict overall survival (OS). A final parsimonious model was defined, and an external validation cohort was used to assess its discrimination and calibration at one, six, and 12 months. RESULTS: In the 173-patient Discovery cohort, the majority of patients had primary lung cancer (56%), presence of extracranial disease (ECD) (75%), Eastern Cooperative Oncolgy Group - Performance Status (ECOG-PS) score 1 (41%) and no intracranial hypertension (ICH) (74%). Most patients were classified as the RPA class II (48%). The final piecewise Cox model was based on primary site, age, ECD, ECOG-PS and ICH. An external validation of the model was carried out using a cohort of 79 patients. Individualized survival estimates obtained with this model outperformed the RPA and DS-GPA scores for overall survival prediction at 1-month, 6-months and 12- months in both Discovery and Validation cohorts. A R/Shiny web application was developed to obtain individualized predictions for new patients, providing an easy-to-use tool for clinicians and researchers. CONCLUSION: Our model provides individualized estimates of survival for poor prognosis patients undergoing WBRT, outperforming actual scoring systems.

Application of a multi-institutional nomogram predicting salvage whole brain radiation-free survival to patients treated with postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The ultimate goal of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of brain metastases (BM) is to avoid or postpone whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). A nomogram based on multi-institutional data was developed by Gorovets, et al. to estimate the 6 and 12-months WBRT-free survival (WFS). The aim of the current retrospective study was to validate the nomogram in a cohort of postoperative BM patients treated with adjuvant SRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the data of 68 patients treated between 2008-2017 with postoperative SRT for BM. The primary endpoint was the WFS. The receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for both 6- and 12-months time points. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 64 months, the 1-year cumulative incidence of local and distant brain relapse rates were 15% [95% CI=8-26%] and 34% [95% CI=24-48%], respectively. At recurrence, repeated SRT or salvage WBRT were applied in 33% and 57% cases, respectively. The WFS rates at 6 and 12 months were 88% [95% CI=81-97%] and 67% [95% CI=56-81%], respectively. Using the Gorovets nomogram, the 6 months rates were overestimated while they were accurate at 12 months. AUC values were 0.47 and 0.62 for the 6- and 12-months respectively. Overall, Harrell's concordance index was 0.54. CONCLUSION: This nomogram-predicted well the 12 months WFS but its discriminative power was quite low. This underlines the limits of this kind of predictive tool and leads us to consider the use of big data analysis in the future.

[Repeated irradiation of brain metastases under stereotactic conditions: A review of the literature]. / Irradiations répétées de métastases cérébrales en conditions stéréotaxiques : revue de la littérature.

Stereotactic radiotherapy has become a standard in the management of patients with brain metastases; its main interest is to differ whole brain radiotherapy, provider of neurocognitive toxicity and to increase the rate of local control. The repetition of radiotherapy sessions under stereotactic conditions is not codified, neither on the number of technically and clinically possible sessions, nor on the maximum total number or volume of metastases to be treated. The purpose of this review is to analyse the data in the literature concerning repeated irradiations under stereotactic conditions. The second reirradiation in stereotactic condition shows satisfactory results in terms of overall survival, local control, and toxicity. However, we lack data for patients receiving more than two sessions of SRS as well as to define dose constraints to reirradiated healthy tissues. Prospective trials are still needed to validate the management of recurrent brain metastases after initial SRS.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large brain metastases: Optimizing the dosimetric parameters.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of brain metastases (BM). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of four plans for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for large brain metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients treated with upfront NovalisTx® non-coplanar multiple dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) HFSRT for≥25mm diameter single BM were included. Three other volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were evaluated: with coplanar arcs (Eclipse®, Varian, VMATcEclipse®), with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs (VMATncEclipse®), and with non-coplanar arcs (Elements Cranial SRS®, Brainlab, VMATncElements®). The marginal dose prescribed for the PTV was 23.1Gy (isodose 70%) in three fractions. The mean GTV was 27mm3. RESULTS: Better conformity indices were found with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (1.05 vs 1.28, P<0.05). Better gradient indices were found with VMATncElements® and DCA (2.43 vs 3.02, P<0.001). High-dose delivery in healthy brain was lower with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (5.6 to 6.3 cc vs 9.4 cc, P<0.001). Low-dose delivery (V5Gy) was lower with VMATncEclipse® or VMATncElements® than with DCA (81 or 94 cc vs 110 cc, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: NovalisTx® VMAT HFSRT for≥25mm diameter brain metastases provides the best dosimetric compromise in terms of target coverage, sparing of healthy brain tissue and low-dose delivery compared to DCA.

[What is the place of surgery in the management of brain metastases in 2020?] / Quelle est la place de la chirurgie dans la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales en 2020 ?

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and are associated with a dismal prognosis. The management of patients with brain metastases has become more important because of the increased incidence of these tumours, the better treatment of the systemic disease and the improvement of surgical techniques. The treatment requires multidisciplinary approaches and become complex because of new emerging systemic therapy and advancements in neurosurgery and radiation oncology. The surgical treatment has an indispensable role to obtain a tissue diagnosis, in relieving intracranial effect mass and improving neurological status by improving induced encephalopathy. An understanding of the role and indications of the surgery in patients with metastatic brain lesions is essential for the effective management of this growing population.

[Place and modalities of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of cerebral metastases]. / Place et modalités de l'irradiation postopératoire dans la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales.

Metastases are the most common brain tumors. After surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of the resection cavity is the standard of care. Data from two randomized trials indicate that SRT to the surgical bed is an effective treatment in reducing local failure as compared with observation, while reducing the risk of cognitive deterioration and maintaining quality of life as compared with whole brain radiation therapy. Local control appears higher after hypofractionated SRT compared to single-fraction SRT. Several questions such as target volumes, the optimal regimen in particular for large tumor bed, strategies to reduce the risk of lepto-meningeal recurrence, and the treatment sequence still need to be answered.