Increased Posterior Tibial Slope After Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy May Result in Degenerative Changes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed at evaluating changes in posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA) and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) before and after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) through 2-staged arthroscopic findings and verified whether the ACLs would be affected by the changed PTSA. We also evaluated which predisposing factors could influence ACL changes after MOWHTO. METHODS: From July 2010 to March 2016, 164 knees that could follow the second-look arthroscopy at the time of plate removal were enrolled. Radiologically, preoperative and postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, femorotibial angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and PTSA were evaluated. Based on our previous study, we assessed the ACL using the macroscopic grading system (normal, abnormal degenerative, and partially ruptured ACL) by first- and second-look arthroscopy and compared it before and after HTO. The correlation between changes in PTSA (△PTSA) and ACL was evaluated. We also assessed predisposing factors that might affect ACL changes. RESULTS: Mean age at the time of osteotomy was 57.2 ± 5.1 years and time interval between the 2-stage arthroscopies was 26.3 ± 4.0 months. PTSA significantly increased after MOWHTO (P < .001). ACL stage at second-look arthroscopy was significantly progressed compared to first-look findings (P < .001). △PTSA was larger in the progressed group (2.1°; P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that greater body mass index (odds ratio, 1.2; P = .029) and larger △PTSA (odds ratio, 1.3; P = .008) were predisposing factors. CONCLUSION: Increased posterior tibial slope following MOWHTO may result in degenerative ACL changes. Greater body mass index and larger △PTSA were predisposing factors for ACL degeneration after MOWHTO.

Numerical comparative study of five currently used implants for high tibial osteotomy: realistic loading including muscle forces versus simplified experimental loading.

BACKGROUND: Many different fixation devices are used to maintain the correction angle after medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). Each device must provide at least sufficient mechanical stability to avoid loss of correction and unwanted fracture of the contralateral cortex until the bone heals. In the present study, the mechanical stability of following different implants was compared: the TomoFix small stature (sm), the TomoFix standard (std), the Contour Lock, the iBalance and the second generation PEEKPower. Simplified loading, usually consisting of a vertical load applied to the tibia plateau, is used for experimental testing of fixation devices and also in numerical studies. Therefore, this study additionally compared this simplified experimental loading with a more realistic loading that includes the muscle forces. METHOD: Two types of finite element models, according to the considered loading, were created. The first type numerically simulated the static tests of MOWHTO implants performed in a previous experimental biomechanical study, by applying a vertical compressive load perpendicularly to the plateau of the osteotomized tibia. The second type included muscle forces in finite element models of the lower limb with osteotomized tibiae and simulated the stance phase of normal gait. Section forces in the models were determined and compared. Stresses in the implants and contralateral cortex, and micromovements of the osteotomy wedge, were calculated. RESULTS: For both loading types, the stresses in the implants were lower than the threshold values defined by the material strength. The stresses in the lateral cortex were smaller than the ultimate tensile strength of the cortical bone. The implants iBalance and Contour Lock allowed the smallest micromovements of the wedge, while the PEEKPower allowed the highest. There was a correlation between the micromovements of the wedge, obtained for the simplified loading of the tibia, and the more realistic loading of the lower limb at 15% of the gait cycle (Pearson's value r = 0.982). CONCLUSIONS: An axial compressive load applied perpendicularly to the tibia plateau, with a magnitude equal to the first peak value of the knee joint contact forces, corresponds quite well to a realistic loading of the tibia during the stance phase of normal gait (at 15% of the gait cycle and a knee flexion of about 22 degrees). However, this magnitude of the knee joint contact forces overloads the tibia compared to more realistic calculations, where the muscle forces are considered. The iBalance and Contour Lock implants provide higher rigidity to the bone-implant constructs compared to the TomoFix and the PEEKPower plates.

The effects of different hinge positions on posterior tibial slope in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the standard hinge position to minimize effects from medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on the posterior tibial slope. METHODS: Sixteen cadaveric knees underwent medial open-wedge osteotomy using either the standard or the low hinge position. To define the standard hinge position, a line 3 cm inferior to the medial tibial plateau towards the fibular head and located its intersection with a longitudinal line 1 cm medial to the fibular shaft was drawn. Low hinge position was defined as the point 1 cm inferior to the standard position. After tibial osteotomy, computed tomography scans of each knee were taken and three-dimensional models were constructed to characterize hinge position orientation and measure the osteotomy site effects on posterior tibial slope, medial proximal tibial angle, and gap ratio (the ratio of the anterior to posterior gap in the opened wedge). RESULTS: In two low hinge position specimens, the tibial lateral cortex hinge fracture occurred. Osteotomy through the low hinge position resulted in significantly greater posterior tibial slope compared to the standard hinge position (mean ± standard deviation) (11.2 ± 3.0° and 5.6 ± 2.5°, respectively; p < 0.001). Medial proximal tibial angle was also significantly greater for low compared to standard hinge position (95.4 ± 3.5° and 88.0 ± 3.5°, respectively; p < 0.001). Gap ratio was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Hinge position significantly affects the posterior tibial slope and medial proximal tibial angle following medial open-wedge HTO. Accurate hinge position is crucial to prevent complications from changes in posterior tibial slope and medial proximal tibial angle after surgery.