What Abductor Repair Technique Provides the Best Functional Outcomes after Proximal Femur Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Oncologic Indications? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting data regarding the optimal abductor mechanism (AM) repair technique after resection of proximal femur tumors. We sought to compare functional outcomes following tumor resection and reconstruction with proximal femoral replacement (PFR) based on the AM repair technique utilized. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We established two study groups based on AM repair technique: soft-tissue reattachment (STr) and greater trochanter preservation (GTp). In the STr group, the gluteus medius and minimus were reattached to the endoprosthesis, whereas in the GTp group, the greater trochanter and gluteal tendons were preserved. The STr group was further subdivided into direct and indirect reattachment, with the latter involving the use of a Trevira tube, Prolene mesh, or synthetic ligament. Weighted means adjusting for sample size were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 658 patients from 12 articles were included. Patients who had STr displayed higher MSTS scores (75 versus 67.3%, P < 0.001), and lower rates of Trendelenburg gait (33.9 versus 52.4%, P < 0.01) and ambulation with assistive devices (AD) (30.4 versus 54.9%, P < 0.001) compared to the GTp group. Within the STr group, indirect reattachment was associated with higher Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores (87.2 versus 70.1%, P < 0.001) and lower rates of Trendelenburg gait (3.8 versus 36.3%, P < 0.001) and ambulation with AD (0 versus 42.4%, P < 0.001) compared to direct reattachment. Reattachment hardware failure rate in GTp was 15%. CONCLUSION: A STr provided superior functional outcomes compared to GTp in tumor-related PFR. From a functional outcome perspective, use of indirect STr was better compared to direct STr.

Outcome of Endoprosthetic Hip Reconstruction Following Resection of Malignant Bone Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past few decades, tumor arthroplasty has evolved into an established therapeutic approach for addressing bone defects following tumor resection in the extremities. As the diagnosis has a significant impact on patients' lives, it is important to give clear expectations for functional recovery. Therefore, we investigated both the functional outcomes and the quality of life (QoL) after tumor arthroplasty for malignant hip tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who had undergone resections of malignant hip tumors with consecutive modular hip arthroplasty between 2010 and 2018. Demographics, tumor entity, and complications stemming from both tumors and treatments were evaluated through the analysis of medical records and perioperative records. The assessment of functional outcomes was conducted with the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), and the Short Form Survey 36 (SF-36). Furthermore, we performed subgroup analysis in two groups: one divided into survivors and non-survivors, as well as younger individuals (<57 years) and older individuals (>57 years). RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. At the time of follow-up, 19 patients were deceased. The average duration of follow-up was 3.2 (±2.51) years. The average age at the time of surgery was 60.3 (±15.20) years. Notably, there were no cases of amputation reported (0%). Five cases of implant failure were identified (16.67%). Among these, one was attributed to infection (3.3%), while four resulted from aseptic loosening (13.3%). In terms of functional outcomes, MSTS indicated good results (18 ± 7; range: 7-28; 60%), and the HHS demonstrated moderate outcomes (75.3%). Younger survivors (<57 years) exhibited notably superior results in terms of both the MSTS and physical functioning in the SF-36 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In summary, this study shows declining tumor arthroplasty-related complications and satisfying functional outcomes as well as QoL. Noteworthy aspects include the relatively low rates of amputation and local tumor recurrences, which significantly favor the selection of appropriate therapeutic options. Moreover, the findings underscore the substantial impact of patients' age on overall functionality and engagement in daily activities.

Distal Femur Cemented Modular Prosthesis Failure Causing a Medical Device-Related Adverse Event: A Report of a Rare Case.

A distal femoral cemented modular prosthesis is a viable option for post-bone tumor and limb salvage procedures. The major reasons for implant failures are the poor quality of implants, mechanical stress, biochemical reactions, and extended period of the implant in vivo use. Rare incidences have been reported of distal femur prosthesis implant malfunctioning in a subject having osteosarcoma. Common adverse events associated with implant failure include surgical site infections, swelling, pain, revision of the surgical procedure, cyst formation, and build-up of metal debris on soft tissues. Our case report summarizes gross malfunctioning of a distal femur cemented modular prosthesis experienced by a 24-year-old post-operated osteosarcoma patient who developed excruciating sudden pain and the inability to bear weight on the right leg, with the sudden onset of these symptoms developing while turning in bed.

Coverage of lateral soft tissue defects with sartorius muscle flap after distal femoral replacement for malignant bone tumors.

INTRODUCTION: To prevent infection after limb-sparing surgery for primary malignant bone tumors, it is important to cover the megaprosthesis with muscle tissue that has sufficient blood flow. Coverage with a lateral gastrocnemius flap has been reported in cases of distal femoral replacement in which the vastus lateralis and vastus intermedius muscles have been resected; however, the risk of peroneal nerve palsy is reportedly high because the muscle flap passes near the peroneal head. This study was performed to examine the postoperative outcomes of patients with primary malignant bone tumors of the distal femur who underwent wide resection (including the vastus lateralis and vastus intermedius muscles) followed by reconstruction with a megaprosthesis and coverage of the lateral side of the prosthesis with a sartorius muscle flap. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed three patients who underwent reconstruction with a megaprosthesis after wide resection of a primary malignant bone tumor of the distal femur involving the vastus lateralis and vastus intermedius muscles and reconstruction of the soft tissue defect on the lateral side of the prosthesis with a sartorius muscle flap. RESULTS: The average defect size was 6 × 13 cm, the average time required for a sartorius muscle flap was 100 min, and the average implant coverage was 93%. The average postoperative follow-up period was 35 months, during which no postoperative complications such as infection, skin necrosis, or nerve palsy occurred. DISCUSSION: The distally based sartorius muscle flap is easy to elevate in the supine position, has minimal functional loss after harvesting, and has minimal risk of nerve palsy. It can be advocated as the first option for coverage of soft tissue defects lateral to distal femoral replacement.

Proximal tibial replacement with megaprosthesis in the setting of proximal tibial nonunion: A case report.

Background: Fracture nonunion is a major concern among an orthopaedic patient population, especially in those who have sustained traumatic fractures involving the tibia. Strong risk factors for nonunion include age, smoking history, and a poor diet. The incidence of nonunion also increases with each additional failed surgical intervention. Methods: Our retrospective case study involved 56-year-old woman with a history of chronic low back pain, osteopenia, malnutrition, smoking, marijuana use, and alcohol use, who presented with a proximal tibia fracture after a fall, initial treatment included temporization with multiplanar external fixation and subsequent internal fixation. Five weeks later, she presented with atrophic nonunion. She subsequently underwent multiple unsuccessful surgeries to address her nonunion, including open repair with bone grafting and multiplanar external fixation for bone transport. Ultimately, the nonunion was addressed by proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis with excellent clinical results. Results and conclusion: Replacement of a proximal tibia with megaprosthesis is a viable option for limb salvage, especially when all alternative treatments have been unsuccessful.

Explaining needs for rehabilitation in patients with bone sarcoma and a megaprosthesis: a qualitative, grounded theory study.

PURPOSE: To explain the needs for rehabilitation of patients with bone sarcoma before and after surgical resection and reconstruction with megaprosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a qualitative study following constructivist grounded theory principles. We purposefully recruited rich cases. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analyzed with grounded theory data-analysis. Initial, focused, and theoretical coding were first performed independently by two authors and followed by discussion in consensus meetings with all authors. Ultimately, a conceptual model was created. RESULTS: Thirteen participants were interviewed between March and May 2023. Seven theoretical codes were found. The first is the need to achieve a new normal, being able to function with their medical history and megaprosthesis in a new normal life. Two key values patients needed were being understood and being prepared. Four important conditions that patients needed were: optimal conditions for rehabilitation, a trustworthy physical therapist, a clear closure from rehabilitation, and access to expertise in the hospital. The core category was achieving a new normal. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with bone sarcoma need rehabilitation to achieve a new normal life. With the understanding of needs regarding rehabilitation now gained, the care for patients with bone sarcoma should be better tailored.

Bone sarcoma is a life threatening, disabling disease requiring intensive medical treatment.The goal of rehabilitation should be to help patients achieve a new normal.Rehabilitation professionals will need to acquire the additional knowledge and relevant skills to treat patients.Rehabilitation professionals should prepare the patients by providing clear and uniform information about their rehabilitation.

Patients Regularly Return to Medium- and Low-Impact Types of Sporting Activities Following Distal Femoral or Proximal Tibial Replacement After Resection of a Primary Bone Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the resumption of sporting activities following megaprosthetic reconstruction of the distal femur and proximal tibia after resection of a bone sarcoma. Thus, the aims of our study were: (1) to assess the functional outcome; (2) to evaluate pre- and post-operatively performed sporting activities; and (3) to identify potential beneficial and limiting factors. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2015, a total of 230 patients underwent distal femoral replacement (DFR), and 96 patients underwent proximal tibial replacement (PTR). The exclusion criteria were death, amputation, living overseas, and a congenital disability. Functional outcome and sporting activities were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), subjective knee value (SKV), the Tegner activity score (TS), and the modified weighted activity score (WAS). RESULTS: There were 93 patients who had a median follow-up of 182 months (interquartile range (IQR) 130 to 260) after DFR with the following median scores: MSTS 18 (IQR 12 to 23), TESS 75% (IQR 60 to 84), FJS 25 (IQR 8 to 40), SKV 53% (IQR 40 to 70), TS 3 (IQR 3 to 4), and WAS 4 (IQR 0 to 8). There were 42 patients who had a median follow-up of 193 months (IQR 137 to 244) after PTR had the following median scores: MSTS 17 (IQR 15 to 22), TESS 78% (IQR 68 to 88), FJS 32 (IQR 20 to 46), SKV 60% (IQR 40 to 70), TS 3 (IQR 3 to 4), and WAS 4 (IQR 1 to 10). Postoperatively, 61% of DFR and 76% of PTR patients participated in at least one sporting activity. CONCLUSIONS: The functional outcome is overall good with a regular resumption of sporting activities. Patients' age at surgery and higher preoperative sporting levels were associated with better functional outcomes and higher postoperative sporting activity.

Extended distal femur resection: Megaprosthesis with telescopic bone allograft augmentation versus total femur prosthesis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Oncological distal femur resections can leave a proximal femur too short to host a stem. Reconstructive techniques are then challenging. The purpose of the study is to compare implant survival, complication rate and MSTS of two different options. METHODS: We retrospectively divided 33 patients with primary bone tumours of distal femur in Group 1 (16 patients reconstructed with knee megaprosthesis with proximal bone augmentation, APC) and Group 2 (17 patients reconstructed with total femur prosthesis, TFP). Less than 12 cm of remaining proximal femur were planned for all resections. RESULTS: MSTS score at 2 years is 25 ± 5 for Group 1 and 19 ± 7 for Group 2 (confidence interval [C.I.] 95%, p = 0.02). At 5 years it is 27 ± 2 for Group 1 and 22 ± 6 for Group 2 (C.I. 95%, p = 0.047). Failure and complication rates are lower for Group 1, but no statistical significance was reached. In APC reconstruction, union at the host-allograft junction was achieved in 16 out of 16 patients using the telescopic bone augmentation technique. CONCLUSIONS: APC provides higher functional results compared to TFP after extended distal femur resection. In APC reconstruction, telescopic augmentation is excellent for achieving union at the host-allograft junction.

Metal Ion Release in Cancer Patients Following Megaprosthesis Salvage Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Megaprostheses contain many more modular components than conventional total hip and knee arthroplasty, which may lead to higher serum levels of metal ions. The aim of this study was to determine serum concentrations of titanium, chromium, and cobalt ions in cancer patients after limb salvage surgery with a megaprosthesis. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive cohort analysis consisting of patients who underwent cancer-related limb salvage surgery with a megaprosthesis at our hospital between 2010 and 2020 was conducted. Baseline and follow-up data were extracted from clinical and surgical records. Blood samples were prospectively obtained. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients underwent limb salvage surgery during the study period. Of these, 22 (10 women, 12 men) were included in the study. The mean age was 52 years (range, 21 to 80). Most cases (n = 16; 72.7%) involved the femur. Most patients (n = 14, 63.6%) underwent total knee megaprosthesis surgery. Implant revision surgery was required in 45% of cases (n = 10), with a mean interval of 4.32 years between the initial and revision surgeries. The mean follow-up time after revision surgery was 4.05 years. High levels of chromium were observed in 22.7% of patients (n = 5). High cobalt levels were found in 68.2% (n = 15) of patients, with toxic levels in 9.1% (n = 2). Titanium levels were high in 77.3% (n = 17) of cases and toxic in 22.7% (n = 5). Postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with titanium levels (P = .017). No correlation was observed between metal ion levels and time from primary or revision surgery or time from the first to revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that cancer-related limb salvage surgery with megaprosthesis is associated with metal ion levels that exceed established safe thresholds. Compared to conventional hip arthroplasty, a higher proportion of the patients in this cohort presented elevated levels of metal ions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Surgical Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Hip and Knee Megaprostheses.

Periprosthetic joint infection is a feared complication after the megaprosthetic reconstruction of oncologic and non-oncologic bone defects of including the knee or hip joint. Due to the relative rarity of these procedures, however, optimal management is debatable. Considering the expanding use of megaprostheses in revision arthroplasty and the high revision burden in orthopedic oncology, the risk of PJI is likely to increase over the coming years. In this non-systematic review article, we present and discuss current management options and the associated results focusing on studies from the last 15 years and studies from dedicated centers or study groups. The indication, surgical details and results in controlling infection are presented for debridement, antibiotics, irrigation and retention (DAIR) procedure with an exchange of the modular components, single-stage implant exchange, two-stage exchanges and ablative procedures.

Knee Arthrodesis Using Dual-Plate Construct is Following Failed Distal Femur Megaprosthesis-A Case Report.

Introduction: Knee arthrodesis following failed total knee arthroplasty is a viable limb salvage option, and this procedure is reserved for failed two-stage revision surgery in severe comorbid patients with irreparable extensor mechanism disruption, severe instability, and extensive soft tissue loss. Knee arthrodesis using a dual-plate construct has been scarcely reported. We report a case of knee arthrodesis using a dual-plate construct in a male in his 20s who presented to us with a broken distal femur megaprosthesis. Case Report: An anterior midline incision was given. The cement mantle and broken prosthetic components were removed. The bone surfaces were freshened up and fixed using two orthogonal locking plates. After 4 months, there was a solid fusion in the knee, and the patient started walking independently with a short limb gait. The patient was advised limb lengthening for a shortening of 3 cm, but he denied it and managed with a shoe raise. After 4 years, he was pain free, and radiographs revealed a solid knee fusion. The patient was fully satisfied with the procedure, and he resumed manual work. Conclusion: This case report revealed that knee arthrodesis using a dual-plate construct is an economically viable salvage option for failed distal femur megaprosthesis.

Elbow Reconstruction with Megaprosthesis: An Effective Strategy for Salvage Surgery in Trauma Patients.

Delayed fracture healing can have devastating functional consequences, including pseudoarthrosis. Many factors can contribute to delayed healing, including decreased vascularity, micro-motion at the fracture site, large fracture gaps, multiple traumas at the same site, compromised metabolic status, surgical complications, and other conditions. A 61-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital with left distal humeral pseudarthrosis, accompanied by chronic pain and disability. Two years prior, the patient suffered a traumatic incident. At another medical facility, the patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation surgery with simultaneous ulnar nerve transposition. She showed favorable postoperative recovery. Unfortunately, approximately one year later, the patient sustained a second trauma to the same arm. This led to peri-implant fracture and post-traumatic aseptic degradation of the osteosynthesis system which was subsequently removed. Twelve months after the last surgery, the patient was referred to our hospital and, after thorough consideration of the therapeutic options, we decided to perform left elbow arthroplasty with left distal humeral reconstruction by using Zimmer's Comprehensive Segmental Revision System. This approach is generally reserved for tumors, and only a handful of cases of megaprostheses for non-tumoral indications have been previously reported. The surgery and perioperative care of our patient were optimal, there were no complications, and the patient recovered arm functionality following rehabilitation.

Topical Application of Vancomycin Powder to Prevent Infections after Massive Bone Resection and the implantation of Megaprostheses in Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery.

Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a serious burden in orthopaedic oncology. Through the years, several local expedients have been proposed to minimise the risk of periprosthetic infection. In this study, we report our outcomes using topical vancomycin powder (VP) with the aim to prevent PJIs. Materials and methods: Fifty oncological cases treated with massive bone resection and the implant of a megaprosthesis were included in our study. Among them, 22 [(GGroup A) received one gram of vancomycin powder on the surface of the implant and another gram on the surface of the muscular fascia]. The remaining 28 did not receive such a treatment (Group B). The rest of surgical procedures and the follow-up were the same for the two groups. Patients underwent periodical outpatient visits, radiographs and blood exams' evaluations. Diagnosis of PJIs and adverse reactions to topical vancomycin were recorded. Results: None of the cases treated with topical vancomycin developed infections, whereas 6 of the 28 cases (21.4%) who did not receive the powder suffered from PJIs. These outcomes suggest that cases treated with VP had a significantly lower risk of post-operative PJI (p=0.028). None of our cases developed acute kidney failures or any other complication directly or indirectly attributable to the local administration of VP. Conclusions: The topical use of vancomycin powder on megaprosthetic surfaces and the overlying fascias, alongside with a correct endovenous antibiotic prophylaxis, can represent a promising approach in order to minimise the risk of periprosthetic infections in orthopaedic oncology surgery.

Proximal Femur Megaprostheses in Orthopedic Oncology: Evaluation of a Standardized Post-operative Rehabilitation Protocol.

Background: Reconstructions of the proximal femur after massive resections represent one of the main challenges in orthopedic oncology. Among the possible treatments, megaprostheses represent one of the most used and reliable reconstructive approaches. Although literature about their outcomes has flourished through the last decades, a consensus rehabilitative treatment is still far from being established. Materials and methods: We evaluated the functional results of all our oncologic cases treated between 2016 and 2022 that could follow our standardized post-operative rehabilitative approach, consisting in progressive hip mobilization and early weight-bearing. Results: Twenty-two cases were included in our study. On average, their hospitalization lasted 15.1 days. The seated position was achieved on average within 3.7 days after surgery, the standing position reached 5.4 after surgery, while assisted deambulation was started 6.4 days after surgery. After a mean post-operative follow-up of 44.0 months, our patients' mean MSTS score was 23.2 (10-30). Our data suggested a statistically significant inverse linear correlation between post-operative functionality and patients' age, resection length, and the start of deambulation. Conclusions: A correct rehabilitation, focused on early mobilization and progressive weight-bearing, is crucial to maximize patients' post-operative functional outcomes.

Reverse Shoulder Megaprosthesis for Massive Proximal Humeral Bone Loss in Fracture Outcome Settings: A Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.

In trauma settings, including the management of outcomes, there is no consensus on the most appropriate reconstructive method in the presence of severe bone loss of the proximal humerus. The objective of this report is to evaluate the short-term functional outcomes of two patients in whom reverse shoulder megaprosthesis was used to treat the failure of trauma surgery with severe bone loss. The secondary objective was to compare the results obtained with the literature regarding the use of megaprosthesis in shoulder trauma surgery. The patients showed a satisfying functional recovery and increased quality of life. At the 12-month follow-up, no complications occurred. Regarding the risk of complications, especially the risks of mobilization of the megaprosthesis, the CT-based intraoperative navigation system optimizes the configuration of the screw for the initial fixation of the glenoid component. Shoulder megaprosthesis appears to be a viable option not only in oncologic surgery but also in cases of failed trauma surgery. The functional results, considering functional score and range of motion, are encouraging and allow patients to improve their quality of life.

Are silver-coated megaprostheses superior to uncoated megaprostheses in managing chronic end-stage periprosthetic hip and knee infection?

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes for silver coated megaprostheses (SC-MP) used in cases of end-stage periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have not been clearly defined. Although attractive, concerns over implant longevity and the risk of infection relapse exist among the scientific community. Therefore, we sought to investigate the effect of silver coating in lower-extremity MPs used in such difficult-to-treat scenarios. The study's primary hypothesis was that the periprosthetic infection control rate would be higher in patients with silver-coated implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-interventional retrospective study with a historical comparison group. We identified all consecutive end-stage hip and knee PJI cases at our center managed with exchange arthroplasty using a silver-coated megaprosthesis from January 2016 to March 2021, these cases were compared with a historical cohort of end-stage PJI cases managed with uncoated megaprostheses. The main outcome studied was infection control rate. Secondarily, we analyzed the short-to-medium-term survivorship of this type of silver-coated implant. RESULTS: Fifty-nine megaprostheses used in cases of end-stage PJI were included in this study. We identified 30 cases of chronic hip or knee PJI in which a silver-coated modular megaprosthesis was implanted. Our non-coated megaprosthesis (NC-MP) historical group included 29 patients. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. We found no statistically significant differences in infection control rate (80% vs. 82.8%, p = 0.47) or implant survivorship (90% vs. 89.65%, p = 1) after a mean follow-up for SC-MP of 46.43 months, and 48 months for the non-coated MP group. In relapsed cases, there were no differences in infection eradication after DAIR (66% SC-MP vs. 60% NC-MP success rate, p = 1). During the follow-up we observed one case of skin argyria without further repercussion. CONCLUSION: We were unable to confirm our initial hypothesis that use of silver-coated implants in end-stage PJI scenarios may be associated with better outcomes in terms of infection control or implant survivorship.

Reconstruction of the elbow with distal humerus endoprosthetic replacement after tumor resection: a systematic review of the literature and institutional case series.

BACKGROUND: Distal humerus replacement (DHR) is a modular endoprosthesis mainly used for bone reconstruction after resection of primary or metastatic bone lesions. Studies on DHR failure rates and postoperative functional outcomes are scarce. We sought to assess implant survival, modes of failure, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing DHR for oncologic indications. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed. PRISMA guidelines were followed for this manuscript. Our study was registered on PROSPERO (457,260). Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using the STROBE checklist. Prosthetic failure was assessed using the Henderson classification for megaprosthetic failures. We additionally performed a retrospective review of patients treated with a DHR for oncologic indications at a large tertiary care academic center. Weighted means were calculated to pool data. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 162 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 1.66-8 years). Henderson type 2 failures (aseptic loosening) were the most common mode of failure, occurring in 12% of cases (range, 0%-33%). Five-year implant survival was 72% (range, 49%-93.7%). Mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 81.1 (range, 74-84.3). In our institutional case series, 2 out of 5 patients had DHR revision for periprosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening at 16 and 27 months after surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Distal humerus replacement is a successful reconstruction strategy for tumors of the distal humerus, with high implant survival and good to excellent functional outcomes.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty megaprosthesis for surgical management of severe proximal humeral bone loss.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of severe proximal humerus bone loss can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a modular segmental megaprosthesis when implanted in a reverse configuration for complex primary arthroplasty, reconstruction at the time of oncologic resection, and revision shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Joint Registry Database was queried to identify all shoulder arthroplasties performed at a single institution using the Comprehensive Segmental Revision System reverse shoulder arthroplasty (SRS-RSA; Zimmer Biomet). A retrospective review of electronic medical records and radiographs was performed to record demographic data, indication, outcomes, complications, and revision surgery. RESULTS: Between February 2012 and October 2022, a total of 76 consecutive SRS-RSAs were implanted. An analysis of patients with minimum 12-month follow-up yielded 53 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.43 years. Surgical complication rate in this cohort was observed in 41.5% (22 of 53) of cases. Overall, the revision rate at final follow-up was 26.4% (14 of 53), with a significant difference between the primary and revision cohorts. The number of prior surgeries was a significant risk factor for revision surgery, with a hazard ratio of 1.789 (95% confidence interval 1.314-2.436, P < .001). When analyzing aseptic humeral loosening rates across study cohorts, a significant difference was found between the primary arthroplasty (0%, n = 0) and the revision arthroplasty cohorts (22.2%, n = 6) (P = .04). DISCUSSION: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a modular segmental megaprosthesis remains a reasonable salvage option for shoulder reconstruction in the setting of proximal humeral bone loss. Because of the substantial bone loss and soft tissue deficiencies typically present in these cases, surgeons should educate patients on the relatively high complication rate, particularly when used in the setting of a previous failed arthroplasty.

How to create by your own a customized hip cement mega-spacer for a hip megaprosthesis two-stage revision surgery after oncologic limb-salvage surgery - Surgical technique and case report.

Managing chronic periprosthetic infections in patients who have undergone limb-salvage surgery following a malignant bone tumor with megaprosthesis often involves a two-stage revision surgery with the use of a cement-spacer. This paper show details the preparation of a self-made intramedullary metal-stabilized mega-cement spacer for patients needing a two-stage revision surgery due to infection after oncologic bone tumor resection and limb-salvage surgery with megaprosthesis and present two clinical cases treated with this technique. The report provides a practical surgical technique to create a cement hip mega-spacer using readily available tools in most orthopedic surgical settings.

[High revision rates and mortality after treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures with a distal femur replacement : An analysis from the EPRD]. / Hohe Revisionsraten und Mortalität nach Versorgung periprothetischer distaler Femurfrakturen mit einem distalen Femurersatz : Eine Analyse aus dem EPRD.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFF) are challenging injuries, as mostly geriatric patients with serious comorbidities are affected. Revision to a distal femoral replacement (DFR) is often the best option in very distal fractures, poor bone stock and/or loose total knee replacement. Data on outcome after these surgeries is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study was initiated to analyze the outcome after distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) were analyzed. From a total of 43,945 revision knee replacement surgeries in the registry, 629 patients could be identified with a PDFF in which a DFR was used for revision. The mean age was 79.1 years, and 84.1% were female. Revisions and mortality were analyzed and compared with patient groups with a similar procedure (revision total knee arthroplasty) or similar general condition (fracture hip replacement). To make the groups more comparable, matched-pair-analyses were performed that included age, gender, BMI and comorbidities as matching parameters. RESULTS: Within 1 year after surgery 17.1% of the patients died and 10.4% were revised. Within 4 years 35.5% died and 22.3% were revised. Revision rates were lower in elective knee revisions (1 year 6.0%, 4 years 16.8%). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) accounted for 50% of all revisions, resulting a PJI rate of 7.3%. Mortality after DFR was similarly high as after fracture hip arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: After DFR for PDFF every third patient died, and every fifth patient needed revision within 4 years after surgery, which demonstrates the severity of this injury. Efforts should be undertaken to provide optimal treatment to these high-risk patients to reduce unfavorable outcomes. Surgeries should be well prepared and performed as early as possible in hospitals with adequate experience.