Menopause and endometriosis.

The shift in paradigm from the belief that endometriosis exclusively affects women of reproductive age has brought attention to its manifestation in postmenopausal patients. Despite this emerging awareness, there remains a dearth of information in the literature regarding postmenopausal endometriosis, with uncertainties surrounding its prevalence, clinical significance, optimal management strategies, and prognosis. Clinical manifestations of endometriosis in menopausal patients lack specificity, with pain onset possible at any stage of life. The primary approach for symptomatic postmenopausal endometriosis continues to be surgical excision, serving both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes while mitigating the risk of coexisting malignancies. Managing the disease in postmenopausal women presents challenges due to possible contraindications for menopausal hormone therapy and the elevated risk of recurrence and malignant transformation. However, conclusive data regarding the appropriateness of menopausal hormone therapy in women with endometriosis or a history of the disease are lacking. Current recommendations lean towards prioritizing combined menopausal hormone therapy formulations or tibolone over estrogen-only therapies due to their potentially higher malignancy risk. The possible increased risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women with endometriosis is likely linked to a history of surgical menopause at an earlier age, but more research is warranted. This narrative review summarizes the available literature and provides insights into the intricate connection between endometriosis and menopause, shedding light on pathogenesis, symptoms, oncologic risk, diagnosis, and treatment.

Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: A nationwide cohort study in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the impact of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in postmenopausal women and to examine the effects of each specific MHT drug. METHODS: In this Korean population-based cohort study, 452,124 women aged > 40 years who consulted a healthcare provider for menopause were evaluated from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014. After propensity score matching, 138,991 pairs were included in the MHT and non-MHT groups. Participants were followed up until December 31, 2020. RA was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, limited to seropositive RA (M05). RESULTS: RA developed in 567 (0.4 %) of the 138,424 patients in the MHT group. The RA risk in the MHT group was not significantly increased compared with that of controls (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.998-1.256). However, MHT use for ≤ 3 years was associated with an increased risk of RA (HR 1.277, 95 % CI 1.127-1.447). When estrogen/progestogen was used, the HR was 1.24 (95 % CI 1.05-1.46), whereas when tibolone was used, the HR was 1.33 (95 % CI 1.13-1.57). CONCLUSION: The use of MHT did not show a significant impact on the development of RA in postmenopausal women. However, a subanalysis that specifically examined the duration of MHT revealed a noteworthy increase in the risk of RA during the initial 3 years of MHT use.

The use of menopausal hormone therapy after cancer.

The changing landscape of gynaecological and breast cancers has involved the development of more targeted and effective therapies, and improved survival. Ultimately, these changes result in an increasing number of women surviving their cancer diagnosis, with increasing emphasis on quality-of-life issues by following treatments. Many of these women experience severe menopausal symptoms associated with cancer treatments, but the hormonal nature of many gynaecological and breast cancers complicates the effective management of these symptoms. Generally, there is a paucity of high-quality data directly examining the safety of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) following many female cancers, and more research is needed with long term follow-up to ensure the provision of comprehensive, patient-focussed care. This article aims to synthesise and evaluate the current evidence to provide comprehensive yet accessible information to clinicians to help guide treatment decisions about the use of MHT in women, who have experienced, or are at increased risk of, both gynaecological and breast cancers. These treatment decisions should often be made in a multi-disciplinary setting which encourages shared decision-making with patients.

Optimizing menopausal hormone therapy:for treatment and prevention,menstrual regulation,and reduction of possible risks / 《全球健康杂志（英文）》

Menopausal hormone therapy(MHT)is used to treat menopausal complaints including the genitourinary syn-drome of menopause,to prevent osteoporosis,and to treat bleeding problems.Since these can be the indications also in young women,especially with POI(premature ovarian insufficiency)or with surgical menopause(bilateral oophorectomy),also the old term"Hormone Replacement Therapy(HRT)"is still used.The effective component is the estrogen component without relevant difference in the efficacy of the various MHT-preparations.Addi-tional preventive benefits are reduction of cardiovascular disease(including prevention of diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome),reduction of colon cancer,and perhaps also Alzheimer's disease,if started within a"win-dow of opportunity",i.e.in perimenopause or within 6-10 years after menopause.Primary indication for progestogen addition is to avoid the development of estrogen-dependent endome-trial cancer,i.e.addition not recommended in hysterectomized women.Two main schedules,sequential-or continuous-combined estrogen/progestogen regimens,are used for treatment of bleeding problems.For this and for optimizing menstrual regulation detailed recommendations are given including proposed dosages for the available different progestogens if added to oral or transdermal estradiol in different estrogen dosages.The WHI-study demonstrated the main risks using MHT within a"worst-case scenario",i.e.start of MHT in old women with high risk for breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases,whereby only"conjugated equine estro-gens"and"medroxprogesterone acetate"have been tested.One main result was that the progestogen component is decisive for the risk of breast cancer,which according to own experimental research and observational studies may be reduced using the physiological progesterone or its isomer dydrogesterone.In addition we propose to push forward research for screening patients with increased breast cancer risk like we have done in the past decade demonstrating that certain membrane-bound receptors in breast cancer tissue or blood can increase this risk.To reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism and stroke,transdermal estradiol(gels,patches,)should be used,in free combination with progesterone or dydrogesterone as"golden standard"in patients with increased risk.To increase the compliance in our patients without special risks we mostly use the available fix-combinations of estradiol/dydrogesterone getting strong efficacy,good menstrual regulation or amenorrhea,respectively,but also other combinations may be indicated to take advantage of for example androgenic or antiandrogenic pro-gestogens.

Emirati Women's Knowledge about the Menopause and Menopausal Hormone Therapy.

The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge of Emirati women aged 30-64 about menopause, menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), and their associated health risks, and additionally, to determine the relationships between Emirati women's knowledge about menopause and their sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted of 497 Emirati women visiting five primary healthcare centers in Dubai. Data were collected using a questionnaire composed of sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics, menopause knowledge scale (MKS), and menopause symptoms knowledge and MHT practice. The mean menopause symptoms knowledge percentage was 41%, with a standard deviation of 21%. There were significant differences in the mean knowledge percentage among categories of education level (p < 0.001) and employment (p = 0.003). No significant differences in the knowledge percentages were found among categories of menopausal status. "Pregnancy cannot occur after menopause" was the statement with the highest knowledge percentage (83.3%), while the lowest knowledge percentages were "risk of cardiovascular diseases increases with menopause'' (23.1%), "MHT increases risk of breast cancer'' (22.1%), and "MHT decreases risk of colon cancer'' (13.9%). The knowledge of Emirati women about menopause, MHT, and related heart diseases was very low; therefore, an education campaign about menopause and MHT risks is needed to improve their knowledge for better coping with the symptoms.

Selective estrogen receptor modulator with estrogen does not affect the proliferation and apoptosis of uterine leiomyoma cells.

BACKGROUND: The administration of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in women with uterine leiomyomas is still debated. The purpose of this article is to study the proliferation and apoptosis of uterine leiomyoma cells under the impact of selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) combined with estrogen. METHODS: Primary cultured uterine leiomyoma cells in the perimenopausal period were treated with estrogen (17-beta estradiol) + SERM (raloxifene) as the tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) group, while both estrogen + medroxyprogesterone acetate (E+P) and estrogen (E) alone as were used as control groups. The expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) proteins was assessed by methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and western-blot analysis, respectively. RESULTS: The proliferation in the TSEC group was weaker than the control groups (P<0.001). There was no statistical difference between the TSEC and blank control group on cell proliferation at 72 h (P=0.13). However, there was a significant difference between the other groups (P<0.001). PCNA expression of TSEC was lower than that of the E + P and E groups (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the expression of PCNA between the TSEC and blank control groups (P=0.63). Bcl-2 expression of TSEC was lower than that of the E + P and E groups (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the expression of Bcl-2 between the TSEC group and the blank control group (P=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: SERM combined with estrogen may have a better safety for perimenopausal women with uterine leiomyoma in MHT.