Report of SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant in Morocco.

In this study, we report the identification of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) JN.1 variant and the quasi-complete genomic sequencing of four clinical samples in Morocco. Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from four patients (one female, three males). The Illumina COVIDSeq Test was used for comprehensive genomic analysis.

Development and validation of supervised machine learning multivariable prediction models for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia using nasopharyngeal swab PCR in adults in a low-HIV prevalence setting.

BACKGROUND: The global burden of the opportunistic fungal disease Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) remains substantial. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) has high specificity and may be a viable alternative to the gold standard diagnostic of PCR on invasively collected lower respiratory tract specimens, but has low sensitivity. Sensitivity may be improved by incorporating NPS PCR results into machine learning models. METHODS: Three supervised multivariable diagnostic models (random forest, logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting) were constructed and validated using a 111-person Australian dataset. The predictors were age, gender, immunosuppression type and NPS PCR result. Model performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were compared to select the best-performing model. RESULTS: The logistic regression model performed best, with 80% accuracy, improving sensitivity to 86% and maintaining acceptable specificity of 70%. Using this model, positive and negative NPS PCR results indicated post-test probabilities of 84% (likely PJP) and 26% (unlikely PJP), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The logistic regression model should be externally validated in a wider range of settings. As the predictors are simple, routinely collected patient variables, this model may represent a diagnostic advance suitable for settings where collection of lower respiratory tract specimens is difficult but PCR is available.

A novel metric-based approach of scoring early host immune response from oro-nasopharyngeal swabs predicts COVID-19 outcome.

Unpredictable fatal outcome of COVID-19 is attributed to dysregulated inflammation. Impaired early adaptive immune response leads to late-stage inflammatory outcome. The purpose of this study was to develop biomarkers for early detection of host immune impairment at first diagnosis from leftover RNA samples, which may in turn identify high risk patients. Leftover RNA samples of COVID-19 patients at first diagnosis were stored. Following prospective follow-up, the samples were shorted and categorized into outcome groups. Impaired adaptive T cell response (severity score) and Impaired IL-10 response (undetectable IL-10 in the presence of high expression of a representative interferon response gene) were determined by RT-PCR based assay. We demonstrate that a T cell response based 'severity score' comprising rational combination of Ct values of a target genes' signature can predict high risk noncomorbid potentially critical COVID-19 patients with a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 58.7-99.8) and specificity of 92.6% (95% CI 75.7-99) (AUC:0.88). Although inclusion of comorbid patients reduced sensitivity to 77% (95% CI 54.6-92.2), the specificity was still 94% (95% CI 79.8-99.3) (AUC:0.82). The same for 'impaired IL-10 response' were little lower to predict high risk noncomorbid patients 64.2% (95% CI 35.1-87.2) and 82% (95% CI 65.5-93.2) respectively. Inclusion of comorbid patients drastically reduce sensitivity and specificity51.6% (95% CI 33.1-69.8) and 80.5% (95% CI 64.0-91.8) respectively. As best of our knowledge this is the first demonstration of a metric-based approach showing the 'severity score' as an indicator of early adoptive immune response, could be used as predictor of severe COVID-19 outcome at the time of first diagnosis using the same leftover swab RNA. The work flow could reduce expenditure and reporting time of the prognostic test for an earliest clinical decision ensuring possibility of early rational management.

Metagenomic profiling of nasopharyngeal samples from adults with acute respiratory infection.

Diagnosis of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) is challenging due to the broad diversity of potential microbial causes. We used metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to analyze the nasopharyngeal virome of ARI patients, who had undergone testing with a clinical multiplex PCR panel (Amplisens ARVI-screen-FRT). We collected nasopharyngeal swabs from 49 outpatient adults, 32 of whom had ARI symptoms and were PCR-positive, and 4 asymptomatic controls in Kazakhstan during Spring 2021. We assessed the biodiversity of the mNGS-derived virome and concordance with PCR results. PCR identified common ARI viruses in 65% of the symptomatic cases. mNGS revealed viral taxa consisting of human, non-human eukaryotic and bacteriophage groups, comprising 15, 11 and 28 genera, respectively. Notable ARI-associated human viruses included rhinovirus (16.3%), betaherpesvirus 7 (14.3%) and Epstein-Barr virus (8.16%). The primary phage hosts were Streptococcus spp. (32.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (24.5%) and Burkholderia spp. (20.4%). In total, 47% of ARIs were linked solely to bacterial pathogens, a third to viral-bacterial co-infections, and less than 10% to only viral infections by mNGS. PCR showed low concordance with mNGS, except for rhinovirus. These results underscore the importance of broad diagnostic methods and question the effectiveness of commonly used PCR panels in ARI diagnosis.

Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of an RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Saliva has been proposed as a potential more convenient, cost-effective, and easier sample for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections, but there is limited knowledge of the impact of saliva volumes and stages of infection on its sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: In this study, we assessed the performance of SARS-CoV-2 testing in 171 saliva samples from 52 mostly mildly symptomatic patients (aged 18 to 70 years) with a positive reference standard result at screening. The samples were collected at different volumes (50, 100, 300, and 500 µl of saliva) and at different stages of the disease (at enrollment, day 7, 14, and 28 post SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis). Imperfect nasopharyngeal (NP) swab nucleic acid amplification testing was used as a reference. We used a logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to estimate sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, accounting for the correlation between repeated observations. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity values were consistent across saliva volumes. The sensitivity of saliva samples ranged from 70.2% (95% CI, 49.3-85.0%) for 100 µl to 81.0% (95% CI, 51.9-94.4%) for 300 µl of saliva collected. The specificity values ranged between 75.8% (95% CI, 55.0-88.9%) for 50 µl and 78.8% (95% CI, 63.2-88.9%) for 100 µl saliva compared to NP swab samples. The overall percentage of positive results in NP swabs and saliva specimens remained comparable throughout the study visits. We observed no significant difference in cycle number values between saliva and NP swab specimens, irrespective of saliva volume tested. CONCLUSIONS: The saliva collection offers a promising approach for population-based testing.

SARS-CoV-2 Positivity in Foreign-Born Adults: A Retrospective Study in Verona, Northeast Italy.

We compared SARS-CoV-2 positivity between the foreign-born adult working population and Italians living in the Verona area to investigate whether being a foreign-born adult could confer an increased risk of infection or lead to a diagnostic delay. The present study included 105,774 subjects, aged 18-65 years, tested for SARS-CoV-2 by nasopharyngeal swabs and analyzed at the University Hospital of Verona between January 2020 and September 2022. A logistic regression model was used, controlling for gender, age, time of sampling, and source of referral. A higher proportion of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in Italian (30.09%) than in foreign-born (25.61%) adults was reported, with a higher proportion of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in men than women in both cohorts analyzed. The difference in swab positivity among Italian and foreign-born adults was the highest in people aged 18-29 years (31.5% vs. 23.3%) and tended to disappear thereafter. Swab positivity became comparable between Italian and foreign-born adults during the vaccination campaign. Multivariable analysis confirmed the lower risk of swab positivity among foreign-born adults (OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.82-0.89). In the Verona area, foreign-born adults showed a lower rate of SARS-CoV-2 positivity than the native population, likely because of underdiagnosis. Hence, public health should increase attention toward these particularly vulnerable populations.

Clinical Performance of Self-Collected Purified Water Gargle for Detection of Influenza a Virus Infection by Real-Time RT-PCR.

Purpose: Self-collected specimens are increasingly being used as alternatives to swab-based methods for the detection of respiratory viruses. While saliva is well accepted, gargle specimens are a potential alternative with characteristics that are more favorable for laboratory handling. This study assessed the performance of gargle specimens in the detection of influenza A viruses (IAVs). Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective head-to-head comparison between combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs (NPS&OPS) and purified water gargle (PWG) among adult outpatients with febrile respiratory symptoms to detect IAVs using real-time RT-PCR during two influenza seasons. Results: During study periods 1 (July 13 to 26, 2022, H3N2 predominated) and 2 (February 25 to March 10, 2023, H1N1 pdm09 predominated), a total of 459 patients were recruited. The overall agreement between the NPS&OPS and PWG was 85.0% (390/459, κ = 0.697), with 88.0% in period 1 and 82.6% in period 2. The detection rate of IAVs in PWG (51.6%, 237/459) was lower than that in NPS&OPS (62.3%, 286/459) (p < 0.0001). The overall sensitivity and specificity were 96.6% (93.7-98.3%) and 100% (97.1-100%) in NPS&OPS and were 80.1% (75.0-84.4%) and 100% (97.1-100%) in PWG, respectively. Among the 227 pairs of concordant positive specimens, cycle threshold (Ct) values were significantly lower in NPS&OPS than in PWG (median Ct values: 24.2, 28.2, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Although self-collected PWG specimens offer acceptable performance for IAVs molecular testing, NPS&OPS remain a reliable option. Given the convenience of collection, nonviscous gargles are recommended for viral detection during emergencies or under specific conditions.

MOLECULAR DETECTION PROTOCOL OF SARS-COV-2 THROUGH SELF-COLLECTED SALIVA SPECIMENS VERSUS NASOPHARYNGEAL SWABS.

Background: Several reports have shown that saliva specimen is an excellent alternative biofluid sample for SARS-CoV-2 detection. We conducted this study, in order to assess the sensitivity and specificity of using saliva self-collected by adult and pediatric patients, as a biological sample for RT-PCR diagnosis. Aims: The present study was carried out to assess the sensitivity and specificity of using saliva self-collected from adult and pediatric patients, as a biological sample for RT-qPCR diagnosis. Methods: In this study, 50 symptomatic patients and 40 asymptomatic subjects (adult and pediatric) were enrolled between September 2020 and November 2020 at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Bejaia University Hospital (CHU), and tested simultaneously for the sensitivity and specificity of the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome by RT-PCR on both nasopharyngeal swabs NP swab and saliva samples. Results: Our RT-qPCR results revealed that saliva samples showed the highest sensitivity (95% CI [27.67, 29.82]) followed by a nasopharyngeal swab for symptomatic (95% CI [29.64, 31.49]) as well as for asymptomatic adult patients. Moreover, the saliva of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was monitored, and the presence of viral RNA was detected in >95% of the asymptomatic patients as well as the symptomatic patients. Surprisingly, the Ct values of ORF1ab and N genes are highly lower in nasopharyngeal swabs compared to saliva. Indeed, the mean difference note that for the ORF1ab gene and N gene, the mean of difference in ΔCt value were respectively 3.683 and 3.578. Together, including symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, the overall agreement between the saliva sample and the nasopharyngeal is about 84%. Conclusion: The sensitivity of saliva samples remains acceptable; it may still be a viable option in locations where laboratory facilities are lacking for diagnostic purposes in the early phase of the disease.

Detection of infectious SARS-CoV-2 in ocular samples is linked to viral load in the nasopharynx.

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 is known to infect respiratory tissue cells. However, less is known about infection of ocular tissue and potential infectivity of lacrimal fluid. With this study, we want to compare viral loads in eye and nasopharyngeal swabs and analyze these for infectious virus. Methods: Between May 2020 and April 2021 ocular and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 28 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients treated on the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-ward of the University Hospital of Innsbruck, Austria. Samples with PCR detectable SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed via whole genome sequencing and an attempt was made to isolate infectious virus. Results: At the time point of sample collection, 22 individuals were still PCR positive in nasopharyngeal samples and in 6 of these patients one or both ocular samples were additionally positive. CT-values in eyes were generally higher compared to corresponding nasopharyngeal samples and we observed a tendency for lower CT-values, i.e. increased viral load, in nasopharyngeal swabs of individuals with at least one infected eye, compared to those where ocular samples were PCR negative. Ocular and nasopharyngeal sequences from the same patient were assigned to the same variant, either the D614G or the Alpha variant. Infectious virus was successfully isolated from 9 nasopharyngeal swabs, however only from one of the seven PCR positive ocular samples. Conclusion: We could detect SARS-CoV-2 in eyes of some of the infected patients albeit at lower levels compared to nasopharyngeal swabs. However, our results also indicate that lacrimal fluid might be infectious in patients with high viral load.

Comparing Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing of Nasopharyngeal Swab and Lower Respiratory Tract Specimens for the Diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia.

Using nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples instead of lower respiratory tract specimens for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to diagnose Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) may be better tolerated and improve diagnostic accessibility. In this 2-year Australian retrospective cohort study of patients with clinically suspected PJP, P jirovecii PCR on NP swab samples had perfect specificity but low sensitivity (0.66).

Utility of Rapid Nasopharyngeal Swab for Respiratory Pathogens in the Diagnosis of Viral Infections in Children Hospitalized with Fever: A Prospective Validation Study to Improve Antibiotic Use.

Introduction: Fever is among the most common reason for medical assessment and antibiotic prescription in practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate positive and negative predictive values of rapid nasopharyngeal swabs for respiratory pathogens to discriminate viral from bacterial infections. Methods: We prospectively tested children with signs and/or symptoms of infections (e.g., fever, cough, wheezing, suspected urinary tract infection) admitted to a paediatric department. Following discharge, clinical phenotypes were assigned defining a cohort of children having probable/certain viral infection, probable/certain bacterial infection, other inflammatory conditions or healthy controls. Results: In this study, 190 children were enrolled (50.5% females, median age 30.5 (8-86) months). In total, 102 patients (53.7%) were affected by respiratory viral infections, 16 (8.4%) by bacterial infections, 29 (15.3%) were healthy controls and 43 (22.6%) were affected by another pathological condition manifested with fever. In total, 84.3% of patients classified as viral infection tested positive for viruses, compared with 18.8% of patients with bacterial infection (p < 0.001), 18.6% of patients with other condition (p < 0.001) and 17.2% of control patients (p < 0.001). The positive predictive value of NPSs in the diagnosis of viral infection was 88.6% and the negative predictive value was 75.0%. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that rapid NPS tests for respiratory viruses are a useful tool to confirm viral infections in children with fever and improve antibiotic use.

External quality assessment survey for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests in clinical laboratories in Tokyo, 2021.

INTRODUCTION: Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) play a pivotal role in clinical laboratories for diagnosing COVID-19. This study aimed to elucidate the accuracy of these tests. METHODS: In 2021, an external quality assessment of NAATs for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted in 47 laboratories in Tokyo, Japan. In open testing, where the laboratories knew that the samples were intended for the survey, a simulated nasopharyngeal swab suspension sample was used, featuring a positive sample A with a viral concentration of 50 copies/µL, positive sample B with 5 copies/µL, and a negative sample. Laboratories employing real-time RT-PCR were required to report cycle threshold (Ct) values. In blind testing, where the samples were processed as normal test samples, a positive sample C with 50 copies/µL was prepared using a simulated saliva sample. RESULTS: Of the 47 laboratories, 41 were engaged in open testing. For sample A, all 41 laboratories yielded positive results, whereas for sample B, 36 laboratories reported positive results, 3 laboratories reported "test decision pending", 1 laboratory reported "suspected positive", and 1 laboratory did not respond. All 41 laboratories correctly identified the negative samples as negative. The mean Ct values were 32.2 for sample A and 35.2 for sample B. In the blind test, six laboratories received samples. Sample C was identified as positive by five laboratories and negative by one laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: The nature of the specimen, specifically the saliva, may have influenced the blind test outcomes. The identified issues must be meticulously investigated and rectified to ensure accurate results.

Cycle threshold values of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in conjunctival swabs and nasopharyngeal secretions: a comparative study from a tertiary care center in India.

PURPOSE: To detect the viral RNA load of SARS-CoV-2 in conjunctival swabs of COVID-19 patients, and compare with nasopharyngeal swabs. METHODS: Conjunctival swabs of COVID-19 patients (with PCR positive nasopharyngeal swabs) were subjected to quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The cycle threshold (Ct) values of Open Reading Frame 1 (ORF 1 Ab gene) and nucleoprotein (N gene) PCRs were used to assess the viral RNA load, and compare them with the baseline values of nasopharyngeal swabs. RESULTS: Of 93 patients, 17 (18.27%) demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 RNA in conjunctival swabs. Baseline nasopharyngeal swabs were collected at a median of 2 days; while, the conjunctival swabs were collected at median 7 days, from onset of illness (p < 0.001). Despite a significant delay in conjunctival swab collection than nasopharyngeal swabs, the Ct values (ORF or N gene PCRs) were comparable between nasopharyngeal swab and conjunctival swab samples. Subsequently, during the recovery period, in four of these 17 patients (with conjunctival swab positivity), when the second nasopharyngeal swab was 'negative', the conjunctival swab was 'positive'. CONCLUSION: The conjunctival swabs demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 17 (18.27%) of 93 COVID-19 patients. Our results may suggest a delayed or a prolonged shedding of the virus/viral RNA on the ocular surface than in nasopharyngeal mucosa.

Comparison of influenza viral load in nasopharyngeal and midturbinate swabs.

Different specimen types are used for influenza diagnosis but comparative data for viral loads from different swab types are limited. We compared influenza viral loads (determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]) in 93 paired midturbinate and nasopharyngeal swab aliquots from influenza infected patients enrolled in a phase 3 randomized-controlled study with the objective of maximizing the number of swabs available for sequence analysis. Midturbinate swabs yielded a 53% lower viral load versus nasopharyngeal swabs, and this difference was similar for influenza A and B. These data suggest that nasopharyngeal swabs might be preferred in diagnostic settings when obtaining higher viral load is important.

The effect of the distraction methods used before the COVID-19 test on the fear and anxiety levels of children: a RCT study.

The current study aimed to investigate the effect of the distraction methods employed before nasopharyngeal swab sampling from children within the scope of the COVID test on their anxiety and fear levels. The study was an RCT with parallel groups conducted according to the CONSORT statement at the pediatric emergency unit of a hospital in Turkey. Children aged 5-10 years were randomized into three groups: Kaleidoscope, Visual Illusion Cards, and control. Data were collected by the researchers using the Descriptive Characteristics Form, the Children's Anxiety Meter-State, and the Children's Fear Scale. According to the reports of the children, the parents, and the nurse, the mean anxiety score and the mean fear score in the experimental groups were significantly lower after the nasopharyngeal swab procedure compared to the control group (p < .05). Fear and anxiety were observed less in the visual illusion cards group and the kaleidoscope group.

SalivaDirect: an alternative to a conventional RNA extraction protocol for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a clinical setting.

IMPORTANCE: Affordable and accessible tests for COVID-19 allow for timely disease treatment and pandemic management. SalivaDirect is a faster and easier method to implement than NPS sampling. Patients can self-collect saliva samples at home or in other non-clinical settings without the help of a healthcare professional. Sample processing in SalivaDirect is less complex and more adaptable than in conventional nucleic acid extraction methods. We found that SalivaDirect has good diagnostic performance and is ideal for large-scale testing in settings where supplies may be limited or trained healthcare professionals are unavailable.

Analysis of a direct access testing system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the paediatric population attending school.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the paediatric population plays a minor role in the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, in order to keep schools open and reduce SARS-CoV spreading, it is necessary to identify and isolate early SARS-CoV-2 positive paediatric patients even if they are asymptomatic. The aim of this study was to describe a setting for SARS-CoV 2 testing based on the spontaneous presentation of paediatric patients attending school without a medical prescription and explore its appropriateness. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The study performed between September 2020 and March 2021 among a sample of 13,283 paediatric patients who underwent a swab in four different hospital settings (school hot spot, emergency department, day hospital setting and hospital wards). For each patients we collected: date of swab execution, type of swab, execution setting of the swab, result of the swab, information about community spread of the virus in the 14 days prior to the swab execution, sex and age. Results: In our sample, females accounted for 45.8%. The median age was 6.8 years (IQR 3.0-11.2) and the most frequent age category was between 6 and 11 years (27.9%). At multivariable models with a swab tested positive as outcome. The swabs executed in all the hospital settings had a lower likelihood of resulting positive compared with the school hot spot setting. Compared with adolescents aged between 14 and 19 years old, new-borns below 3 months (adjOR 1.83, 95% C.I. 1.14-3) and patients aged between 11 and 14 years old (adjOR 1.32, 95% C.I. 1.07-1.63) reported a higher probability of a swab tested positive. Instead, children aged between 3 months and 3 years (adjOR 0.77, 95% C.I. 0.61-0.96) and children aged between 3 years and 6 years (adjOR 0.66, 95% C.I. 0.53-0.83) were less likely to result positive. The higher was the mean of pooled Rt in the 14 days preceding the swab, the higher was the likelihood of resulting positive (adjOR 1.75, 95% C.I. 1.53-1.99). Conclusion: In conclusion, we found a high incidence of paediatric patients positive to the test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 at the school hot spot compared with other settings during the period of observation. The free access modality to the nasopharyngeal swab was effective in identifying patients with COVID-19. Public health authorities should implement these testing modality in order to help reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in school settings.

Comparison of "hock-a-loogie" saliva versus nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for detecting common respiratory pathogens.

Self-collection of saliva samples has attracted considerable attention in recent years, particularly during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, studies investigating the detection of other common respiratory pathogens in saliva samples are limited. In this study, nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), oropharyngeal swabs (OPS), and "hock-a-loogie" saliva (HLS) were collected from 469 patients to detect 13 common respiratory pathogens. Overall positivity rates for NPS (66.1 %), HLS (63.5 %), and OPS (57.8 %) were statistically different (P = 0.028), with an overall concordance of 72.7 %. Additionally, detection rates for NPS (85.9 %) and HLS (83.2 %) for all pathogens were much higher than for OPS (73.3 %). Coronavirus and human rhinovirus were most frequently detected pathogens in NPS (P < 0.001). Mycoplasma pneumoniae was significantly more prevalent in the HLS group (P = 0.008). In conclusion, NPS was a reliable sample type for detecting common respiratory pathogens. HLS was more easily collected and can be used in emergencies or specific conditions. Mixed NPS/OPS and NPS/HLS specimens have the potential to improve detection rates, although OPS testing alone has a relatively high risk for missed detection.

Deep Neural Network-Based Visual Feedback System for Nasopharyngeal Swab Sampling.

During the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic, robotic-based systems for swab sampling were developed to reduce burdens on healthcare workers and their risk of infection. Teleoperated sampling systems are especially appreciated as they fundamentally prevent contact with suspected COVID-19 patients. However, the limited field of view of the installed cameras prevents the operator from recognizing the position and deformation of the swab inserted into the nasal cavity, which highly decreases the operating performance. To overcome this limitation, this study proposes a visual feedback system that monitors and reconstructs the shape of an NP swab using augmented reality (AR). The sampling device contained three load cells and measured the interaction force applied to the swab, while the shape information was captured using a motion-tracking program. These datasets were used to train a one-dimensional convolution neural network (1DCNN) model, which estimated the coordinates of three feature points of the swab in 2D X-Y plane. Based on these points, the virtual shape of the swab, reflecting the curvature of the actual one, was reconstructed and overlaid on the visual display. The accuracy of the 1DCNN model was evaluated on a 2D plane under ten different bending conditions. The results demonstrate that the x-values of the predicted points show errors of under 0.590 mm from P0, while those of P1 and P2 show a biased error of about -1.5 mm with constant standard deviations. For the y-values, the error of all feature points under positive bending is uniformly estimated with under 1 mm of difference, when the error under negative bending increases depending on the amount of deformation. Finally, experiments using a collaborative robot validate its ability to visualize the actual swab's position and deformation on the camera image of 2D and 3D phantoms.

Comparative study on Saliva and Nasopharyngeal swabs and the outcome of RT-PCR test in patients with mild symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 / Estudio comparativo de muestras de saliva y nasofaríngeas y el resultado de la prueba RT-PCR en pacientes con síntomas leves de SARS-CoV-2

Aim A simple and reliable method for diagnosing COVID 19 infections is the needed. The role of saliva in the transmission of the infection has already been established. Method Saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients suspected to have COVID 19 infections were taken simultaneously, and the results of the RT-PCR were compared. Result Total 405 samples were collected, of which 250 males and 155 females. In the 391 samples included for analysis, 370 (94.63%) samples were found to have concordance results, and 21 (5.37%) samples had discordant results. Conclusion The use of saliva to diagnose COVID 19 infection is reliable, and its use can be recommended. (AU)

Objetivo Un método simple y confiable para diagnosticar infecciones por COVID 19 es necesario. Ya se ha establecido el papel de la saliva en la transmisión de la infección. Método Se tomaron simultáneamente hisopos de saliva y nasofaríngeos de pacientes con sospecha de infección por COVID 19 y se compararon los resultados de la RT-PCR. Resultado Se recogieron 405 muestras, de las cuales 250 hombres y 155 mujeres. En las 391 muestras incluidas para el análisis, se encontró que 370 (94,63%) muestras tenían resultados de concordancia y 21 (5,37%) muestras tenían resultados discordantes. Conclusión El uso de la saliva para diagnosticar la infección por COVID 19 es confiable y se puede recomendar su uso. (AU)