Machine Learning Model Based on the Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio Predicts the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgery.

Background: Circulating eosinophils are associated with tumor development. An eosinophil-related index, the neutrophil to eosinophil ratio (NER), can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with tumors. However, there is still a lack of efficient prognostic biomarkers for HCC. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of the NER and develop an optimal machine learning model for the recurrence of HCC patients. Patients and methods: A retrospective collection of 562 patients who underwent hepatectomy with a pathologic diagnosis of HCC was performed. The relationship between NER and progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated. We developed a new machine learning framework with 10 machine learning algorithms and their 101 combinations to select the best model for predicting recurrence after hepatectomy. The performance of the model was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of characteristics and calibration curves, and clinical utility was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Kaplan‒Meier curves showed that the PFS in the low NER group was significantly better than that in the high NER group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that NER was an independent risk factor for recurrence after surgery. The random survival forests (RSF) model was selected as the best model that had good predictive efficacy and outperformed the TNM, BCLC, and CNLC staging systems. Conclusion: The NER has good predictive value for postoperative recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Machine learning model based on NER can be used for accurate predictions.

Change in the Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio After Avelumab Maintenance for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: The UROKYU Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The association between clinical outcomes and posttreatment changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in patients receiving avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from advanced UC patients who received avelumab and had not progressed with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The association between the changes in NLR and NER from pretreatment to week 6 of avelumab treatment and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this study (male, n=25; female, n=7; median age, 71 years). At six weeks, 19 patients (59.4%) had a decreased NLR and 18 patients (56.3%) had a decreased NER. When the change in NER from pretreatment to six weeks was compared, there was a significant decrease in responders (without progressive disease) (p=0.008); however, there was no significant decrease in non-responders (progressive disease) (p=0.855). The NLR showed no significant change in either group (p=0.099, 0.358). When patients were compared according to the change in the NLR at six weeks, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between the decreased NLR and increased NLR groups (p=0.116, 0.256). When patients were compared according to the change in the NER, the decreased and increased groups showed significant differences in PFS and OS (p<0.001, 0.030). CONCLUSION: In the present real-world study, the responders showed a significantly decreased NER at six weeks. This was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with advanced UC.

Which inflammatory marker, between systemic immune-inflammation index and neutrophil to eosinophil ratio, is associated with Peyronie's disease and are there any implications for a better understanding of its mechanisms?

BACKGROUND: Peyronie's disease affects up to 9% of men and is often accompanied by pain and/or erectile dysfunction. It is characterized by an inflammatory process that is the grassroots of the subsequent fibrosis stage. There is an unmet need to evaluate its onset and progression. Among the newly proposed biomarkers of inflammation, authors developed a novel systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) based on lymphocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts. Similarly, a recent study reported that a neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) represents systemic inflammation. RESULTS: A 49-patient group with Peyronie's disease as confronted with 50 well-matched for age and BMI controls. As laboratory evaluation of inflammation, SII, NER and the eosinophil to neutrophil ratio (ENR) were studied. As a likely risk factor for the presence of Peyronie's disease, a higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, hyperglycemia and hypertension was discovered in the patients compared to controls. A significant difference was found in the median values of the NER between the two selected groups, i.e., 32.5 versus 17.3 (p = 0.0021). As expected, also ENR was significantly different. The receiver operating characteristic curves for SII, ENR and NER were 0.55, 0.32 and 0.67, respectively, highlighting the best performance of NER. The cut-off for NER was 12.1, according to the Youden test. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, any evaluation of circulating eosinophil, evaluated as NER, beyond being a signature of immuno-inflammatory response, help assess tissue homeostasis, since eosinophils are now considered multifunctional leukocytes and give a picture of the inflammatory process and repair process belonging to Peyronie's disease.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La maladie de La Peyronie touche jusqu'à 9% des hommes et s'accompagne souvent de douleurs et/ou de dysfonction érectile. Elle se caractérise par un processus inflammatoire qui est. à la base de l'étape de fibrose ultérieure. Il existe un besoin non satisfait d'en évaluer son apparition et sa progression. Parmi les biomarqueurs de l'inflammation nouvellement proposés, les auteurs ont développé un nouvel indice d'inflammation immunitaire systémique (SII) basé sur le nombre de lymphocytes, de neutrophiles et de plaquettes. De même, une étude récente a rapporté qu'un rapport neutrophiles/éosinophiles (NER) représente une inflammation systémique. RéSULTATS: Un groupe de 49 patients atteints de la maladie de La Peyronie a été confronté à 50 témoins étroitement appariés sur l'âge et l'IMC. Dans le cadre de l'évaluation de l'inflammation au laboratoire, le SII, le NER et le rapport éosinophiles/neutrophiles (ENR) ont été étudiés. En tant que facteur de risque probable de la présence de la maladie de La Peyronie, une prévalence plus élevée d'hypercholestérolémie, d'hyperglycémie et d'hypertension a été découverte chez les patients par rapport aux témoins. Une différence significative a été constatée pour les valeurs médianes du NER entre les deux groupes sélectionnés, c'est-à-dire 32,5 contre 17,3 (p = 0,0021). Comme on pouvait s'y attendre, le ERN était également significativement différent. Les courbes caractéristiques de fonctionnement du récepteur pour le SII, l'ENR et le NER étaient respectivement de 0,55, 0,32 et 0,67, ce qui met en évidence les meilleures performances du NER. Le seuil pour le NER était de 12,1 (test de Youden). CONCLUSIONS: D'après nos résultats, toute évaluation de l'éosinophilie circulante, sous la forme NER, au-delà d'être une signature de la réponse immuno-inflammatoire, permet d'évaluer l'homéostasie tissulaire, puisque les éosinophiles sont maintenant considérés comme étant des leucocytes multifonctionnels, et donne une image du processus inflammatoire et du processus de réparation appartenant à la maladie de La Peyronie. MOTS-CLéS: Maladie de La Peyronie Rapport Neutrophiles/Eosinophiles Rapport Eosinophiles/Neutrophiles Indice d'Inflammation immunitaire systémique Réponse Immuno-inflammatoire.

Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio as a biomarker for clinical outcomes in advanced stage melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) and eosinophil counts are associated with improved survival in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, but no study has investigated neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratios (NER) as a predictive indicator in this population. In this retrospective study evaluating anti-PD-1 treated patients with advanced melanoma, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), and risk of high-grade (grade ≥3) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared between groups defined by median pretreatment NLR and NER as well as median NLR and NER at 1-month post-treatment. Lower baseline NLR and NER were associated with improved OS [HR: 0.504, 95% CI: 0.328-0.773, p = .002 and HR: 0.442, 95% CI: 0.288-0.681, p < .001, respectively] on univariate testing. After accounting for multiple covariates, our multivariate analysis found that lower pretreatment NER was associated with better ORR (by irRECIST) (OR: 2.199, 95% CI: 1.071-4.582, p = .033) and improved OS (HR: 0.480, 95% CI: 0.296-0.777, p = .003). Baseline NLR, 1-month NLR, and 1-month NER were not associated with ORR, PFS, or OS outcomes; but 1-month NER correlated with lower risk of grade ≥3 irAEs (OR: 0.392, 95% CI: 0.165-0.895, p = .029). Our findings suggest baseline NER merits additional investigation as a novel prognostic marker for advanced melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1-based regimens.

Early Phase Persistent Changes in the White Blood Cell Fraction in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Pembrolizumab: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The association of clinical outcomes with posttreatment persistent changes in eosinophils and other white blood cell (WBC) subtypes in patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC) treated with pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 87 patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The changes in WBC subtypes from pretreatment were evaluated three and six weeks after pembrolizumab administration. The association between the changes in the WBC subtypes and clinical outcomes was then evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Among WBC subtypes, significant changes in the absolute (AEC) and relative eosinophil count (REC) and the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) were observed at three and six weeks compared with pretreatment (p<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that a persistent decrease in AEC and REC and a persistent increase in NER were associated with poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: Persistent increase in AEC and REC and decrease in NER in the early phase after pembrolizumab may be significant early predictive markers of improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced UC receiving pembrolizumab.

Inflammatory biomarkers in assessing severity and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiotoxicity.

AIMS: Inflammatory biomarkers, including CRP, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER), may predict outcomes in cancer. However, their value in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy-associated cardiotoxicity remains elusive. We aimed to characterize the relationship of inflammatory markers with severity of ICI-related cardiotoxicities (iRCs) and prognosis among patients with iRCs. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with iRCs between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and were dichotomized based on iRC severity into low-grade (grade 1-2) vs. high-grade (grade 3-4) groups. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included. The median time-to-event from first ICI infusion to onset of iRCs was 35 days (IQR: 19.0-65.5 days). When compared with respective baseline values, cardiac biomarkers and inflammatory markers were significantly elevated at onset of iRCs. Compared with low-grade iRCs, NER at iRC onset was significantly increased among patients with high-grade iRCs (Group × Time, P < 0.01). When grouped by the median NER (184.33) at iRC onset, NER ≥ 184.33 was associated with high-grade iRCs (OR: 10.77, P < 0.05) and had a 36.3% increased mortality compared to the lower NER group (HR: 2.67, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who develop iRCs, NER is significantly elevated at iRC onset, and higher NER correlates with greater iRC severity and higher mortality. Larger datasets are needed to validate these findings.

Association of Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab.

Background: There is a need to develop biomarkers for a more efficient use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Recently, it has been reported that peripheral blood components, including eosinophils, may be effective ICI biomarkers. This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of eosinophils for measuring the effects of nivolumab on recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Materials and Methods: The study included 47 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with nivolumab. Eosinophil-related biomarkers, such as absolute eosinophil count (AEC), relative eosinophil count (REC), and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER), were measured from the peripheral blood of the patients before nivolumab treatment. For each biomarker, the patients were divided into a high- and a low-value group according to their cutoff values, and these groups were compared. Results: Regarding AEC and REC, no significant improvement in the objective response rate (ORR) was observed between patients with AEC >0.9 × 103/µL and those with AEC <0.9 × 103/µL (p = 0.147) and between patients with REC >2.2% and those with REC <2.2% (p = 0.110). However, patients with NER <32 had improved ORR compared with those with NER >32 (P = 0.0361). Additionally, although patients with AEC >0.9 × 103/µL, REC >2.2%, and NER <32 had longer overall survival (OS) than those with AEC <0.9 × 103/µL, REC <2.2%, and NER >32, only patients with NER <32 showed prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those with NER >32 according to the Log rank test (p = 0.046, 0.027, and 0.035, respectively). Furthermore, the multivariate analysis revealed that baseline NER >32 (p = 0.027) was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS. Conclusion: A pretreatment feature of low NER (NER <32) may predict better clinical outcomes in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with nivolumab.

The Eosinophil Changes, Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with an Older Age and a Poor Performance Status.

Background: To evaluate the eosinophil changes, efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients of older age and those with a poor performance status (PS). Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2018 and June 2021 were retrospectively examined. Results: 105 patients (median age, 72 years), 71.4% of whom were men, were enrolled. Patients of ≥75 years of age were considered to be older patients (n=40), and patients with PS ≥2 were considered to have a poor PS (n=10). The objective response and disease control rates were 42.5% and 52.5%, respectively, in older patients and 0% and 10.0%, respectively, in patients with a poor PS. Overall survival (OS) in the older and younger groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with poor survival. Safety analyses demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of any immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including grade ≥3, between the older and younger groups. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with the low occurrence of any irAEs. The change of the eosinophil count, the increase of the relative eosinophil count (REC) and the decrease of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the older and younger groups, but showed significant differences between the poor and good PS (PS 0-1) groups. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab for advanced UC demonstrated similar changes in the eosinophil count, efficacy and toxicity in both older and younger patients. In patients with a poor PS, although toxicity was significantly lower, survival was significantly worse, and neither an increase in REC nor a decrease in NER were observed, but these values showed significant changes in patients with a good PS.

The Association between a Decrease in On-Treatment Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio (NER) at Week 6 after Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Initiation and Improved Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

A lower baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) has been associated with improved responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study investigated the decrease in NER at week 6 after ipilimumab/nivolumab (ipi/nivo) initiation and treatment responses in mRCC. A retrospective study of ipi/nivo-treated mRCC at two US academic cancer centers was conducted. A landmark analysis at week 6 was performed to assess the association between the change in NER and clinical responses (progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS)). Week 6 NER was modeled as a continuous variable, after log transformation (Ln NER), and a categorical variable by percent change. There were 150 mRCC patients included: 78% had clear cell histology, and 78% were IMDC intermediate/poor risk. In multivariable regression analysis, every decrease of 1 unit of Ln NER at week 6 was associated with improved PFS (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 0.78, p-value:0.005) and OS (AHR: 0.67, p-value: 0.002). When NER was modeled by percent change, decreased NER > 50% was associated with improved PFS (AHR: 0.55, p-value: 0.03) and OS (AHR: 0.37, p-value: 0.02). The decrease in week 6 NER was associated with improved PFS/OS in ipi/nivo-treated mRCC. Prospective studies are warranted to validate NER change as a biomarker to predict ICI responses.

Prognostic Impact of Baseline Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy in Second or Later Lines.

Background Inflammation is a crucial component in carcinogenesis. The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) has been studied as a biomarker of prognosis and predictive of response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In the present study, we evaluated the relevance of baseline NER on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in real-world patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in second or subsequent lines. We also assessed the association of baseline NER with objective response, as well as with toxicity and histology. Methods In this multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab, the last systemic absolute neutrophil and eosinophil count before treatment with nivolumab was used to calculate the NER. An additive Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the cut-off point for NER considering PFS and the patients were allocated into low and high NER groups. Median OS and median PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and survival curves of groups were compared using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to study OS and PFS and Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate the association of NER with the response, toxicity, and histology. Results The 49 analyzed patients had a median follow-up of nine months. The NER cut-off was established at 48, locating 29 patients in the low NER group (NER < 48) and 20 in the high NER group (NER ≥ 48). Median PFS and median OS were significantly shorter in patients with high NER versus low NER (3 vs. 30 months (p < 0.001) and 6 vs. 24 months (p = 0.002), respectively). Multivariable analyses showed that NER (HR 3.92 (95% CI: 1.66-9.23), p = 0.002) was an independent factor for PFS and that NER (HR 3.85 (95% CI: 1.33-11.17), p = 0.013) and progressive disease (HR 5.62 (95% CI: 1.88-16.83), p = 0.002) were independent factors for OS. NER was significantly associated with objective response rate (ORR) (NER ≥ 48-12.5% vs. NER < 48-87.5%, p = 0.003), immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (NER ≥ 48-10.0% vs. NER < 48-42.9%, p = 0.014), and tumor's histology as patients of high NER group had more non-clear cell carcinoma than low NER group (35.0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.017). Conclusion Our real-world data analysis of NER in patients with mRCC confirmed the prognostic value of this biomarker, supporting clinical utility in predicting survival. Results also suggested an association between lower NER and better ORR, and that irAEs occur more frequently in patients with a lower NER. However, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to validate this biomarker.

The Association of Clinical Outcomes with Posttreatment Changes in the Relative Eosinophil Counts and Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Pembrolizumab.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association of clinical outcomes with posttreatment changes in the relative eosinophil count (REC) and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC) treated with pembrolizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 105 patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The REC and NER before and three weeks after pembrolizumab were recorded. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off values for analyzing the risk. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) between the REC ≥4.8% and <4.8% groups and the NER ≥13.7 and <13.7 groups before pembrolizumab (p=0.997 and 0.669, respectively). However, a significant difference in the OS was confirmed between the increased and decreased REC groups and between the decreased and increased NER groups at 3 weeks after pembrolizumab (p<0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥2 (P=0.003), albumin <3.7 g/dl (p=0.002), LDH >246 U/L (p=0.011), disease site ≥3 organs (p=0.019), decreased posttreatment REC (3 weeks later) (p=0.002) and increased posttreatment NER (3 weeks later) (p=0.022) were independent prognostic factors for a worse OS. CONCLUSION: An increased REC and decreased NER after pembrolizumab may be significant early predictive markers of improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced UC receiving pembrolizumab.

Neutrophil-Related Ratios Predict the 90-Day Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients After Intravenous Thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mounting researches have illuminated that the neutrophil-related ratios were related to the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, few have compared their predictive value and accuracy. To make such comparison and identify the best indicator on the 90-day outcome, we investigated biomarkers including neutrophil ratio (Nr), neutrophil count (Nc), lymphocyte (L), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet (P or PLT), platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR), NLR-to-platelet ratio (NLR/PLT), eosinophil (E), neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER), monocyte (M), and monocyte-to-neutrophil ratio (MNR). METHODS: This retrospective study recruited 283 AIS and 872 healthy controls (HCs) receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Blood samples were collected after 24 h of admission before IVT. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to explore whether these ratios differentiated AIS and HCs. We applied univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the prediction effect of these ratios separately or added in the model and figured out a clinical prediction model. To estimate the discrimination and calibration of the new models, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, DeLong method, and likelihood ratio test (LR test) were utilized. RESULTS: PSM showed that Nr, Nc, NLR, P, PNR, NLR/PLT, NER, and MNR facilitates the differentiation of the HCs and AIS. Among the eight biomarkers, PNR and MNR could differentiate the 90-day outcome, and it was found out that PNR performed better. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that PNR was the only independent predictor which needs no adjustment. Besides, the multivariate regression analysis, Delong method, and LR test indicated that among the neutrophil-related ratios, NLR, PNR, NLR/PLT, NER, and MNR exerted little influence on the discrimination but could enhance the calibration of the base model, and NER proved to work best. CONCLUSION: Low PNR was the best indicator among the neutrophil-related ratios tin predicting a poor 90-day outcome of AIS patients. Moreover, high NER performed best when predicting the 90-day outcome to improve the calibration of the base model.

Translational relevance of baseline peripheral blood biomarkers to assess the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1 use in solid malignancies.

BACKGROUND: This study is an overall clinical analysis of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD1) antibodies used in a single institution, emphasizing the role of baseline peripheral blood markers as a prognostic or predictor biomarker of immunotherapy. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were retrospectively analyzed from hospital medical records. The endpoint of this study was death from any cause and the survival time was calculated from the date of start of immunotherapy to the date of death. Descriptive and survival statistics was performed using SPSS version 23. Cutoff values for baseline biomarkers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio [NER], and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio [LMR]) were obtained using cutp function of Evaluate Cutpoints software (R survMisc package). Pearson and Pearman correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship of peripheral blood biomarkers. RESULTS: Nighty-eight percent of the study population had Stage IV disease and total median overall survival postanti-PD1 therapy was 10.7 months. Patients receiving more than 5 doses of anti-PD1 therapy (12.6 m vs. 4.4 m, P < 0.001) and used in front lines (18.9 m vs. 10.7 m vs. 10.1 m vs. 2.8 m in first line, second line, third line, and >3 lines, respectively, P = 0.049) were found to have an impact in overall survival. Pembrolizumab showed a better survival compared to nivolumab (17.4 m vs. 8.2 m, P = 0.049) in our study. Among baseline biomarkers assessed, NLR (cutoff - 2.81, P = 0.003) and LMR (cutoff - 5.76, P = 0.017) has shown a statistically significant relationship with immunotherapy response. NER (cutoff - 24.32, P = 0.051) and PLR (cutoff - 190.8, P = 0.072) were also found to exhibit a strong relationship with anti-PD1 therapy response. NLR exhibits a statistically significant positive correlation with PLR (r = 0.917 P < 0.001) and NER (r = 0.400 P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Real-life data analysis of anti-PD1 use for solid cancers highlights that baseline NLR, PLR, NER, and LMR have a significant role as immunotherapy biomarkers. However, larger studies are required to further prove the specificity and sensitivity.

Pretreatment leukocyte ratios and concentrations as predictors of outcome in dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours.

Leukocyte ratios correlate with outcome in several human cancers. Little is known about their prognostic significance in mast cell tumour (MCT). The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment leukocyte concentrations and their ratios in dogs with MCT for survival. Medical records of 92 dogs with MCT were retrospectively reviewed. Tumour diagnosis was made by tumour biopsy or fine-needle aspirate. Only dogs without prior treatment were included. Eosinophil, lymphocyte, monocyte and neutrophil concentration were obtained by ADVIA 2120™ (Siemens Healthcare, Vienna, Austria). Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were calculated from collected leukocyte concentrations. Relative eosinophil concentration (REC), NER (P < 0.001), NLR (P = 0.001) and LMR (P < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors for outcome in univariate analysis. REC (P = 0.008) and NER (P = 0.001) remained independent predictors of survival in multiple analyses. Leukocyte concentrations and ratios, especially REC and NER may serve as prognostic indicators in MCT.