ELEVATE - evaluating Temozolomide and Nivolumab in patients with advanced unresectable previously treated oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma with MGMT methylation: study protocol for a single arm phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma, surgery is the only curative option and despite the use of multimodality therapy, which combines it with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, more than 50% of patients will relapse and die. Many UK patients present with advanced disease which is already inoperable or metastatic at diagnosis. For these patients, standard care chemotherapy only offers them survival of less than a year. Nivolumab, a checkpoint blockade inhibitor, has been found to work in some advanced cancers. It is proposed, for those where immunotherapy hasn't worked, that these immunologically evasive tumours need to be sensitized to immunotherapy drugs to allow them to act. METHODS: ELEVATE is a single arm phase II trial testing the overall response to nivolumab following temozolomide treatment in patients with advanced unresectable previously treated adenocarcinoma which is O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) methylated. 18 patients are being recruited from UK secondary care sites. To be eligible, participants must have been treated with at least 3 months of platinum and fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Participants will receive 50 mg/m2 temozolomide continuously for 3 months. If their disease progresses during the 3 months, they will stop temozolomide and start nivolumab at a dose of 240mg every 2 weeks. If there is no progression after 3 months the participant will continue taking temozolomide in combination with nivolumab. All treatment will stop once the participant progresses on nivolumab. The primary endpoint is the best overall response to nivolumab, using both Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 and immunotherapy modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: ELEVATE will provide evidence for whether giving nivolumab after temozolomide in patients with previously treated advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma is safe and biologically effective prior to future randomised trials. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: EudraCT Number: 2020-004771-41 (issued 01 October 2020); ISCRTN11398887 (registered 14 July 2021).

Detecting and Tracking Circulating Tumour DNA Copy Number Profiles during First Line Chemotherapy in Oesophagogastric Adenocarcinoma.

DNA somatic copy number aberrations (SCNAs) are key drivers in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OGA). Whether minimally invasive SCNA analysis of circulating tumour (ct)DNA can predict treatment outcomes and reveal how SCNAs evolve during chemotherapy is unknown. We investigated this by low-coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS) of ctDNA from 30 patients with advanced OGA prior to first-line chemotherapy and on progression. SCNA profiles were detectable pretreatment in 23/30 (76.7%) patients. The presence of liver metastases, primary tumour in situ, or of oesophageal or junctional tumour location predicted for a high ctDNA fraction. A low ctDNA concentration associated with significantly longer overall survival. Neither chromosomal instability metrics nor ploidy correlated with chemotherapy outcome. Chromosome 2q and 8p gains before treatment were associated with chemotherapy responses. lcWGS identified all amplifications found by prior targeted tumour tissue sequencing in cases with detectable ctDNA as well as finding additional changes. SCNA profiles changed during chemotherapy, indicating that cancer cell populations evolved during treatment; however, no recurrent SCNA changes were acquired at progression. Tracking the evolution of OGA cancer cell populations in ctDNA is feasible during chemotherapy. The observation of genetic evolution warrants investigation in larger series and with higher resolution techniques to reveal potential genetic predictors of response and drivers of chemotherapy resistance. The presence of liver metastasis is a potential biomarker for the selection of patients with high ctDNA content for such studies.

Perioperative chemotherapy with or without epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in unselected patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Randomized phase II study with advanced biomarker program of the German Cancer Society (AIO/CAO STO-0801).

BACKGROUND: Perioperative chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer (EGC). However, as approximately 60% of patients will die from their disease, new therapeutic agents such as molecular-targeted drugs are needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the role of panitumumab with perioperative chemotherapy, previously untreated patients with locally advanced EGC received, in an open-label randomised phase II study (NEOPECX), standard epirubicin, cisplatin, capecitabine (ECX) chemotherapy with or without panitumumab. The primary end-point was the histological response rate after neoadjuvant therapy. The expression status and gene copy number of EGFR, HER2, and MET were determined by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Plasma samples were collected before the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 160 patients (80 versus 80) were eligible. The majority (82% versus 80%) showed lymph node involvement. Rate of R0-resection, percentage of patients with downstaging to ypT0-2 at pathohistological evaluation, and rate of major histological response was equal in both arms. Toxicity was increased by panitumumab with regard to thromboembolic events and skin toxicity. Patients with tumour EGFR, HER2 or MET expression had shorter progression-free and overall survival. FISH positivity for these markers was associated with shorter survival independent of therapy. High levels of soluble EGFR in particular predicted poor survival in the panitumumab arm. CONCLUSION: The addition of panitumumab to ECX did not improve downstaging of locally advanced EGC. Low plasma levels of pathway-associated proteins such as sEGFR may identify a group of patients that benefit from EGFR-directed therapy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01234324.

Preoperative chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (POET): Long-term results of a controlled randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Results of the PreOperative therapy in Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma Trial (POET) showed some benefits when including radiotherapy into the preoperative treatment. This article is reporting long-term results of this phase III study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (Siewert types I-III) were eligible. Randomisation was done to chemotherapy (group A) or induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT; group B) followed by surgery. RESULTS: The primary end-point of the study was overall survival at 3 years. The study was closed early after 119 patients having been randomised and were eligible. Local progression-free survival after tumour resection was significantly improved by CRT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37; 0.16-0.85, p = value 0.01) and 20 versus 12 patients were free of local tumour progression at 5 years (p = 0.03). Although the rate of postoperative in-hospital mortality was somewhat higher with CRT (10.2% versus 3.8%, p = 0.26), more patients were alive at 3 and 5 years after CRT (46.7% and 39.5%) compared with chemotherapy (26.1% and 24.4%). Thus, overall survival showed a trend in favour of preoperative CRT (HR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-1.01, p = 0.055). CONCLUSION: Although the primary end-point overall survival of the study was not met, our long-term follow-up data suggest a benefit in local progression-free survival when radiotherapy was added to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction.

Efficacy and toxicity of salvage weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy in non-Asian patients with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Survival for oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OGA) patients varies globally and clinical trial results are seldom replicated in clinical practice. We sought to examine the efficacy and toxicity of salvage paclitaxel chemotherapy for patients with advanced OGA at our institution. METHODS: Advanced OGA patients treated with paclitaxel between June 2011 and February 2014 were identified from the electronic record at the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH), London. Chart review was performed to obtain demographics, performance status (PS), laboratory parameters, radiological response and dates of progression, death and last follow up. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis examined the interaction between clinical and laboratory parameters and survival. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were identified; OS and PFS were 5.8 and 2.6 months respectively. From first-line chemotherapy, median OS was 14.3 months. Two-year and three-year survival rates from diagnosis were 26% and 13%. More than or equivalent to Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 13% of patients. In multivariate analysis, PS more than or equal to 2, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) more than or equal to100 U/L, and previous rechallenge with platinum were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: OGA cancer patients treated at RMH with salvage paclitaxel had an OS equivalent to patients in clinical trials with more (33%) PS = 2 patients treated and less haematological toxicity than Asian patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS more than or equal to 2, ALP more than or equal to 100 U/L, and prior platinum rechallenge were associated with poor survival. However, the proportion of patients surviving more than or equal to two years from diagnosis demonstrates a clinically relevant improvement from historical controls.

Impact of age on the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTx) improves the prognosis of patients with localised oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGC), but its value is unknown in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received neoCTx followed by surgery for EGC between 2000 and 2012 were analysed. The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility and outcome between patients aged ⩾70 (cohort I) and their younger counterparts (cohort II). RESULTS: Data were available for 460 patients among which 174 (38%) were ⩾70 years. Older age was associated with an increased rate of comorbidities (66% versus 42%, p<0,001). As compared to the younger, elderly patients were more likely to receive doublet instead of triplet neoCTx (65% versus 37%, p<0.001) and oxaliplatin-instead of cisplatin-based regimens (60% versus 32%, p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in the rate of ⩾grade 3 toxicities for cohort I and II (48% versus 41%) and postoperative morbidity was also not different (24% versus 28%). 90 day mortality for cohort I and II was 6.5% and 3.9%. After a median follow-up of 38 months, median disease-free survival (DFS) was 29.4 months in cohort I and 33.8 months in cohort II, with a 5-years DFS of 37% and 40%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in cohort I and was 58.4 months in cohort II, with a 5-year OS of 51% and 50% for cohort I and II, respectively. DISCUSSION: Despite slightly more adverse events and dose reductions, neoCTx is feasible in elderly patients with EGC. Elderly patients achieve comparable survival outcomes compared with their younger counterparts.