Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents in patients with refractory advanced biliary tract cancers.

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib has demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy in various solid tumors. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting that immune therapy can enhance the systemic responses of anlotinib. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of combining anlotinib with PD-1 inhibitors compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy as a second-line treatment option for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). METHODS: A total of 242 patients with BTCs were screened at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2015 to October 2022. Among them, 78 patients who received either anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (AP) or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (FB) as second-line treatment were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and predictive tumor biomarkers. RESULTS: Among the 78 patients with BTCs, 39 patients received AP, while 39 patients were administered FB. The ORR in the AP group was 20.5%, compared to 5.1% in the FB group. The DCR was 87.2% in the AP group and 66.7% in the FB group. The AP group demonstrated significantly better ORR and DCR compared to the FB group (p = 0.042, p = 0.032). The median PFS and OS in the AP group were 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.35-11.45) and 13.9 months (95% CI: 5.39-22.41), respectively. In the FB group, the median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.17-5.03) and 13.2 months (95% CI: 8.72-17.68), respectively. The AP group exhibited significantly better median PFS than the FB group (p = 0.027). In the subgroup analysis, patients without liver metastasis had a much longer PFS in the AP group compared to the FB group (14.3 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.016). Similarly, patients with CEA ≤ 5 µg/L also demonstrated a longer PFS in the AP group compared to the FB group (8.7 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated a promising clinical effect compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of refractory advanced BTCs. Liver metastases and CEA levels may serve as predictive factors for identifying patients who may benefit from AP therapy.

Potential of semen coicis in enhancing the anti-tumor effects of PD-1 inhibitor on A549 cell lines by blocking the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this research was to investigate how the combination of semen coicis extract and PD-1 inhibitors can potentially work together to enhance the anti-tumor effects, with a focus on understanding the underlying mechanism. METHODS: We obtained the active components and specific targets of semen coicis in the treatment of NSCLC from various databases, namely TCMSP, GeneCard, and OMIM. By utilizing the STRING database and Cytoscape software, we established a protein interaction network (PPI) for the active ingredient of semen coicis and the target genes related to NSCLC. To explore the potential pathways involved, we conducted gene ontology (GO) and biological pathway (KEGG) enrichment analyses, which were further supported by molecular docking technology. Additionally, we conducted cyto-inhibition experiments to verify the inhibitory effects of semen coicis alone or in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor on A549 cells, along with examining the associated pathways. Furthermore, we investigated the synergistic mechanism of these two drugs through cytokine release experiments and the PD-L1 expression study on A549 cells. RESULTS: Semen coicis contains two main active components, Omaine and (S)-4-Nonanolide. Its primary targets include PIK3R1, PIK3CD, PIK3CA, AKT2, and mTOR. Molecular docking experiments confirmed that these ingredients and targets form stable bonds. In vitro experiments showed that semen coicis demonstrates inhibitory effects against A549 cells, and this effect was further enhanced when combined with PD-1 inhibitors. PCR and WB analysis confirmed that the inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway may contribute to this effect. Additionally, semen coicis was observed to decrease the levels of IFN-γ, IL-6, and TNF-α, promoting the recovery of the human anti-tumor immune response. And semen coicis could inhibit the induced expression of PD­L1 of A549 cells stimulated by IFN­Î³ as well. CONCLUSION: Semen coicis not only has the ability to kill tumor cells directly but also alleviates the immunosuppression found in the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, it collaboratively enhances the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitors against tumors by blocking the activation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR.

Reacción adversa a medicamento con signos cutáneos (erupción liquenoide) atribuibles a imatinib, y respuesta favorable al tratamiento con fototerapia UVB de banda angosta / Adverse drug reaction with skin signs (lichenoid rash) attributable to imatinib, and favorable response to treatment with narrowband UVB phototherapy

Resumen El imatinib es un agente antineoplásico que actúa como inhibidor de la tirosina-cinasa. Los efectos adversos cutáneos son, en general, leves y autolimitados. Dentro de estos, la erupción liquenoide es infrecuente y suele mejorar sólo con tratamiento tópico. Presentamos el caso de una paciente con erupción liquenoide por imatinib refractaria al tratamiento con corticoides tópicos, con respuesta favorable a terapia de luz ultravioleta B de banda estrecha. No existen casos publicados a la fecha en la literatura de erupción liquenoide por imatinib tratada con fototerapia.

Abstract Imatinib is an antineoplastic agent that acts as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Cutaneous adverse effects are generally mild and self-limited. The lichenoid eruption due to imatinib is rare. It usually improves just with topical treatment. We present the case of a patient with a lichenoid reaction due to imatinib, refractory to treatment with topical corticosteroids, with a favorable response to narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy. There are no published cases to date in the literature of lichenoid eruption due to imatinib treated with phototherapy.

Spectrum and Clinical Activity of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: Regulatory Approval and Under Development.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to highlight the clinical development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer therapy. We focus on detailing the registration trials that have led to FDA-approved indications of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapies and future strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: The number of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors approved and in studies continues to grow, in different scenarios. Although the first wave of approvals included advanced cancers, localized disease is under growing interest in recent trials and approvals. Several of these agents are migrating from a monotherapy strategy to combinations (especially with targeted agents and chemotherapy). To date, several studies are being conducted for a better understanding of predictive biomarkers, mechanisms of resistance, optimal treatment duration, and immune-related toxicities. This article summarizes the recent history of modern cancer immunotherapy, provides an overview of novel drug-development considerations, and thus, illustrates the opportunities these new generations of immunotherapies represent.

A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Palliative Radiotherapy for Hormone Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether combining pembrolizumab with palliative radiation therapy (RT) improves outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative MBC; were candidates for RT to ≥ 1 bone, soft tissue, or lymph node lesion; and had ≥ 1 lesion outside the RT field. Patients received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously 2 to 7 days prior to RT and on day 1 of repeating 21-day cycles. RT was delivered to a previously unirradiated area in 5 treatments each of 4 Gy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The study used a 2-stage design: 8 women were enrolled into the first stage, and if at least 1 of 8 patients experienced an objective response, 19 more would be enrolled. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included association of overall response rate with programmed death-ligand 1 status and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. RESULTS: Eight patients were enrolled in stage 1. The median age was 59 years, and the median prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease was 2. There were no objective responses, and the study was closed to further accrual. The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% confidence interval, 0.4-2.1 months), and the median overall survival was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.6 months). All-cause adverse events occurred in 87.5% of patients, including just 1 grade 3 event (elevation of aspartate aminotransferase). CONCLUSIONS: RT combined with pembrolizumab did not produce an objective response in patients with heavily pre-treated HR+ MBC. Future studies should consider alternative radiation dosing and fractionation in patients with less heavily pre-treated HR+ MBC.