Preimplantation genetic testing: A narrative review.

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a diagnostic procedure that has become a powerful complement to assisted reproduction techniques. PGT has numerous indications, and there is a wide range of techniques that can be used, each with advantages and limitations that should be considered before choosing the more adequate one. In this article, it is reviewed the indications for PGT, biopsy and diagnostic technologies, along with their evolution, while also broaching new emerging methods.

Which factors affect the live birth outcome of the first single euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in couples with balanced chromosomal translocations?

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the factors that influence the live birth rate (LBR) of the first single euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles after preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) in couples with balanced chromosomal translocations (BCT). Design: Single center, retrospective and observational study. Methods: A total of 336 PGT-SR and the first single euploid FBT cycles between July 2016 and December 2022 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the live birth outcomes. The parameters of the study population, controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, and FBT cycles were analyzed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to find the factors that affected the LBR. Results: The percentage of blastocysts at developmental stage Day 5 compared to Day 6 (51.8% vs. 30.8%; P<0.001) and with morphology ≥BB compared to

A heatmap for expected cumulative live birth rate in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and chromosomal structural rearrangements.

PURPOSE: Our objective is to predict the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and identify the specific subset within the population undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) which is likely to exhibit a diminished expected CLBR based on various patient demographics. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective cohort study including 1522 women undergoing 3130 PGT cycles at a referral centre for PGT. A logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the CLBR per ovarian stimulation in women undergoing PGT-M by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, and in women undergoing PGT-SR by SNP array, array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: The mean age of women was 32.6 years, with a mean AMH of 2.75 µg/L. Female age and AMH significantly affected the expected CLBR irrespective of the inheritance mode or PGT technology. An expected CLBR < 10% was reached above the age of 42 years and AMH ≤ 1.25 µg/L. We found no significant difference in outcome per ovarian stimulation between the different PGT technologies, i.e. PCR, SNP array, array CGH and NGS. Whereas per embryo transfer, we noticed a significantly higher probability of live birth when SNP array, array CGH and NGS were used as compared to PCR. CONCLUSION: In a PGT-setting, couples with an unfavourable female age and AMH should be informed of the prognosis to allow other reproductive choices. The heatmap produced in this study can be used as a visual tool for PGT couples.

Clinical outcomes in carriers of insertional translocation: a retrospective analysis of comprehensive chromosome screening results.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes in the carriers of insertional translocation (IT). Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: University-affiliated reproductive medical center. Patients: Twenty-three couples with ITs. Intervention: No direct interventions were involved; however, this study included patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for structural chromosomal rearrangements (PGT-SR). Main Outcome Measure: Outcome of preimplantation genetic testing for structural chromosomal rearrangements and percentage of blastocysts available for transfer. Results: Among 23 IT carriers, 15 were simple interchromosome ITs (type A), 3 were intrachromosome IT carriers (type B), and 5 were interchromosome IT carriers combined with other translocations (type C). A total of 190 blastocysts from 30 cycles were biopsied, 187 embryos were tested successfully, and only 57 blastocysts (30.5%) from 21 patients were available for transfer (normal or balanced). The unbalanced rearrangement rate of type C was 79.2% (42/53), and the proportion of type A was 50.0% (57/114), which was significantly higher than that of type B (5%, 1/20). In type A, the probability of embryos harboring unbalanced rearrangement in female carriers was 56.0% (51/91), which was higher than that in male carriers (26.1%, 6/23). Furthermore, the haploid autosomal length value of the inserted fragment was correlated linearly with the incidence of abnormal embryos. In type A gametes, most gametes produced by 2:2 separation without crossover, and no 3:1 separation gamete was observed. Conclusions: The chance of identifying normal or balanced and mosaic blastocysts per mature oocytes in patients with ITs are 16.6% (67/404). Greater IT complexity results in fewer transferable embryos. For simple interchromosome ITs, female carriers and those with higher haploid autosomal length values have a higher risk of producing embryos with unbalanced rearrangement.

Assessment of quadrivalent characteristics influencing chromosome segregation by analyzing human preimplantation embryos from reciprocal translocation carriers.

Patterns of meiotic chromosome segregation were analyzed in cleavage stage and blastocyst stage human embryos from couples with autosomal reciprocal translocations (ART). The influence of quadrivalent asymmetry degree, the presence of terminal breakpoints, and the involvement of acrocentric chromosomes in the rearrangement were analyzed to evaluate their contribution to the formation of non-viable embryos with significant chromosomal imbalance due to pathological segregation patterns and to assess the selection of human embryos by the blastocyst stage. A selection of viable embryos resulting from alternate and adjacent-1 segregation and a significant reduction in the detection frequency of the 3 : 1 segregation pattern were observed in human embryos at the blastocyst stage. The presence of terminal breakpoints increased the frequency of 3 : 1 segregation and was also associated with better survival of human embryos resulting from adjacent-1 mode, reflecting the process of natural selection of viable embryos to the blastocyst stage. The demonstrated patterns of chromosome segregation and inheritance of a balanced karyotype in humans will contribute to optimizing the prediction of the outcomes of in vitro fertilization programs and assessing the risks of the formation of unbalanced embryos for ART carriers.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Genetic Diseases: Limits and Review of Current Literature.

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has emerged as a revolutionary technique in the field of reproductive medicine, allowing for the selection and transfer of healthy embryos, thus reducing the risk of transmitting genetic diseases. However, despite remarkable advancements, the implementation of PGT faces a series of limitations and challenges that require careful consideration. This review aims to foster a comprehensive reflection on the constraints of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, encouraging a broader discussion about its utility and implications. The objective is to inform and guide medical professionals, patients, and society overall in the conscious and responsible adoption of this innovative technology, taking into account its potential benefits and the ethical and practical challenges that it presents.

Effects of different oocyte cytoplasmic granulation patterns on embryo development and euploidy: a sibling oocyte control study.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the relationship between cytoplasmic granulation patterns and the developmental potential of mature sibling oocytes. METHODS: Data from 54 cycles of preimplantation genetic tests for structural rearrangement from July 2019 to June 2022 were analyzed. In total, 564 embryos were cultured using a time-lapse system. Sibling oocytes were divided into four groups based on cytoplasmic granulation patterns: fine granulation (FG) group (n = 177), central granulation (CG) group (n = 183), dispersed granulation (DG) group (n = 161), and uneven granulation (UG) group (n = 43). The CG group was further divided into three groups (grades I, II, and III) based on the tertile of the ratio of central granular distribution area to oocyte area. Fertilization rate, embryo morphokinetics, chromosomal ploidy, and clinical outcomes of the groups were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in morphokinetic parameters, fertilization rate, embryo production, blastocyst formation, and aneuploidy rates among the different cytoplasmic-granulation pattern groups. However, embryos derived from CG oocytes showed significantly higher aneuploidy rates in grade III compared to grade I (86.21% vs 61.54%, P = 0.036) or grade II (86.21% vs 56.00%, P = 0.013). Thirty embryos were transferred to the uteri of female patients and the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates did not significantly differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoplasmic granulation patterns may not affect embryo fertilization, development speed, and aneuploidy rates. However, a higher grade of CG may be associated with increased aneuploidy rates. Larger sample sizes are required to explore the impact of oocyte cytoplasmic granulation patterns on embryo implantation potential.

The effect of carrier characteristics and female age on preimplantation genetic testing results of blastocysts from Robertsonian translocation carriers.

PURPOSE: To analyze factors affecting segregation and ploidy results from Robertsonian carriers, and determine chromosomes involved impact chromosome stability during meiosis and mitosis. METHODS: This retrospective study include 928 oocyte retrieval cycles from 763 couples with Robertsonian translocations undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) between December 2012 and June 2020.The segregation patterns of the trivalent of 3423 blastocysts were analyzed according to the carrier's sex and age. A total of 1492 couples who received preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were included as the control group and matched according to maternal age and testing time stage. RESULTS: A total of 1728 (50.5%) normal/balanced embryos were identified from 3423 embryos diagnosed. The rate of alternate segregation in male Robertsonian translocation carriers was significantly higher than that in female carriers (82.3% vs. 60.0%, P < 0.001). However, the segregation ratio exhibited no difference between young and older carriers. Further, increasing maternal age decreased the proportion of transferable embryo cycle in both female and male carriers. And the ratio of chromosome mosaic from the Robertsonian translocation carrier group was significantly higher than that in the PGT-A control group (1.2% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The meiotic segregation modes were affected by the carrier sex and were independent of the carrier's age. Advanced maternal age decreased the probability of obtaining a normal/balanced embryo. In additional, the Robertsonian translocation chromosome could increase the possibility of chromosome mosaicism during mitosis in blastocysts.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and chromosomal structural rearrangement: A summary of a nationwide study by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Purpose: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology conducted a nationwide clinical study to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy or chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-A/SR). Methods: Patients that had experienced recurrent implantation failure, recurrent pregnancy loss, or chromosomal structural rearrangement were recruited from 200 fertility centers in Japan. For patients in whom one or more blastocysts were classified as euploid or euploid with suspected mosaicism, a frozen-thawed single embryo transfer (ET) was performed. Results: A total of 10 602 cycles, maternal age 28-50 years, were enrolled in this study. 42 529 blastocysts were biopsied, and 25.5%, 11.7%, and 61.7% of embryos exhibited euploidy, mosaicism, and aneuploidy, respectively. At least one euploid blastocyst was obtained in 38.3% of egg retrieval cycles with embryo biopsy. A total of 6080 ETs were carried out, and the clinical pregnancy rate per ET, ongoing pregnancy rate per ET, and miscarriage rate per pregnancy were 68.8%, 56.3%, and 10.4%, respectively. The rates of clinical pregnancy and miscarriage remained relatively constant across all maternal ages. Conclusions: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy or chromosomal structural rearrangement may improve the pregnancy rate per ET and reduce the miscarriage rate per pregnancy, especially in patients of advanced maternal age.

Case report: Optical genome mapping revealed double rearrangements in a male undergoing preimplantation genetic testing.

Chromosome rearrangement is one of the main causes of abortion. In individuals with double chromosomal rearrangements, the abortion rate and the risk of producing abnormal chromosomal embryos are increased. In our study, preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) was performed for a couple because of recurrent abortion and the karyotype of the male was 45, XY der (14; 15)(q10; q10). The PGT-SR result of the embryo in this in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle showed microduplication and microdeletion at the terminals of chromosomes 3 and 11, respectively. Therefore, we speculated whether the couple might have a cryptic reciprocal translocation which was not detected by karyotyping. Then, optical genome mapping (OGM) was performed for this couple, and cryptic balanced chromosomal rearrangements were detected in the male. The OGM data were consistent with our hypothesis according to previous PGT results. Subsequently, this result was verified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in metaphase. In conclusion, the male's karyotype was 45, XY, t(3; 11)(q28; p15.4), der(14; 15)(q10; q10). Compared with traditional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray, CNV-seq and FISH, OGM has significant advantages in detecting cryptic and balanced chromosomal rearrangements.

Cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid analysis in preimplantation genetic testing.

Detection of chromosomal aneuploidies and monogenic disorders in preimplantation embryos is essential for selecting the best embryo for transfer during in vitro fertilization to achieve a healthy pregnancy. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is typically performed on preimplantation embryos to select a genetically normal embryo for transfer. A trophectoderm biopsy is necessary for PGT; this is an invasive procedure to the embryo that requires specialized equipment and highly trained embryologists, resulting in high costs associated with in vitro fertilization treatment. Moreover, the biopsy procedure may increase the likelihood of developing pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia and hypertensive disorders. Therefore, there is a need for noninvasive embryo screening strategies. The presence of cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid in the embryo culture medium presents an opportunity to screen for genetic abnormalities. Cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid is released by embryos in the latter stages of preimplantation development, and its analysis has been proposed as a noninvasive approach for PGT. Here, we review studies reporting the concordance rates between cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid and trophectoderm biopsies, or whole blastocysts, in couples undergoing PGT. Noninvasive PGT results are promising for aneuploidy detection, with some early evidence of successful clinical application. Further research is required to explore its application for the detection of structural rearrangements and monogenic disorders.

Nanopore sequencing for detecting reciprocal translocation carrier status in preimplantation genetic testing.

BACKGROUND: Balanced reciprocal translocation (BRT) is one of the most common chromosomal abnormalities that causes infertility, recurrent miscarriage, and birth defects. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is widely used to select euploid embryos for BRT carriers to increase the chance of a healthy live birth. Several strategies can be used to distinguish reciprocal translocation carrier embryos from those with a normal karyotype; however, these techniques are time-consuming and difficult to implement in clinical laboratories. In this study, nanopore sequencing was performed in two reciprocal translocation carriers, and the results were validated using the next-generation sequencing-based method named, "Mapping Allele with Resolved Carrier Status" (MaReCs). RESULTS: The translocation breakpoints in both reciprocal translocation carriers were accurately identified by nanopore sequencing and were in accordance with the results obtained using MaReCs. More than one euploid non-balanced translocation carrier embryo was identified in both patients. Amniocentesis results revealed normal karyotypes, consistent with the findings by MaReCs and nanopore sequencing. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that nanopore sequencing is a powerful strategy for accurately distinguishing non-translocation embryos from translocation carrier embryos and precisely localizing translocation breakpoints, which is essential for PGT and aids in reducing the propagation of reciprocal translocation in the population.

Do chromosomal inversion carriers really need preimplantation genetic testing?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the rates of euploidy, aneuploidy, and mosaicism in preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) cycles from chromosomal inversion carriers. In addition, this work also focused on assessing the impact of some contributors on the incidence of parental originating aneuploidy and mosaicism. METHODS: This retrospective review enrolled chromosomal inversion carrier couples of whom the females were under 38 years old undergoing PGT-SR at a single academic reproductive center. Subgroups were divided according to the gender of carriers, the inversion type, and the semen parameters of male carriers (male factor infertility (MF) or non-MF). Patient demographics, cycle characteristics, and PGT-SR outcomes were compared among subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 71 PGT-SR cycles from 57 inversion carrier couples were included for analysis. Among the 283 blastocysts, 48.4% were identified as euploidy, 27.9% as aneuploidy, and the remaining 23.7% as mosaicism. Only 32.9% of aneuploid embryos and 1.5% of mosaic embryos involved the parental inversion chromosomes. Notably, the female inversion carriers seemed to produce more parental originating aneuploid embryos than male inversion carriers (45.5% vs 23.9%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The type of inversion and sperm parameters of male chromosomal inversion carriers did not affect the ploidy status of embryos. The incidence of parental originating aneuploidy in inversion carrier couples is lower than expected. For male chromosomal inversion carriers with normal sperm condition whose female partners are under 38 years old, natural conception combined with prenatal diagnosis could be provided as an option during fertility counseling.

Are ovarian responses and the number of transferable embryos different in females and partners of male balanced translocation carriers?

PURPOSE: To compare ovarian response and the number of transferable embryos between women with balanced autosomal translocations and women whose partners carry the translocation (control group). To investigate the predictive value of metaphase II (MII) oocyte number and biopsied embryo number for gaining at lowest one transferable embryo. DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed 1942 preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) cycles of 1505 balanced autosomal translocation couples over 8 years. All cycles were divided into two subgroups: Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations (ROBT and ReBT). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to ascertain a cutoff of MII oocytes and biopsied embryos as predictors of gaining at lowest one transferable embryo. RESULT: There were no statistical differences in baseline features or ovarian response indicators regarding the number of retrieved/MII oocytes, E2 level on the day of HCG, and ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) between women with balanced autosomal translocations and control group (P > 0.05). A decreased number of transferable embryos were found in women with balanced autosomal translocations regardless of the type of translocation. The cutoff values for gaining at lowest one transferable embryo are 12.5 MII oocytes and 4.5 biopsied embryos, respectively. CONCLUSION: Women with balanced autosomal translocations have a normal ovarian response, but fewer transferable embryos, meaning that higher gonadotropin (Gn) doses may be required to increase transferable embryos. When fewer than 12.5 MII oocytes or 4.5 blastocysts are obtained in a PGT-SR cycle, couples should be notified that the likelihood of gaining a transferable embryo is low.

Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of PGT-SR by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) in preventing recurrent miscarriages. Methods: Thirty one couples with balanced translocation who underwent 68 PGT-SR cycles between 2012 and 2020 were evaluated. A total of 242 blastocysts were biopsied for aCGH or NGS. The genetically transferable blastocysts were transferred in the subsequent frozen-thawed single embryo transfer cycle. Results: The genetically transferable blastocyst rate was 21.2% (51/241). Thirty five genetically transferable blastocysts were transferred into the uterine cavity. The clinical pregnancy rate was 57.1% (20/35), and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 100.0% (20/20). The incidence of interchromosomal effect (ICE) was influenced by ovarian stimulation protocol, female age, and carrier's gender, but dependent on the types of balanced translocation carriers. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in meiotic segregation modes in ovarian stimulation protocols and carrier's gender. Interestingly, the incidence of adjacent-1 segregation in ≧40 years group increased significantly compared with <35 years group. Conclusions: For the first time in Japan, we show the effectiveness of PGT-SR using aCGH or NGS, which enables comprehensive analysis of chromosomes, in the prevention of recurrent miscarriages. Furthermore, our results may support better genetic counseling of balanced translocation carriers for PGT-SR cycles.

Risk Factors Affecting Alternate Segregation in Blastocysts From Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles of Autosomal Reciprocal Translocations.

Reciprocal translocations are the most common structural chromosome rearrangements and may be associated with reproductive problems. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze factors that can influence meiotic segregation patterns in blastocysts for reciprocal translocation carriers. Segregation patterns of quadrivalents in 10,846 blastocysts from 2,871 preimplantation genetic testing cycles of reciprocal translocation carriers were analyzed. The percentage of normal/balanced blastocysts was 34.3%, and 2:2 segregation was observed in 90.0% of the blastocysts. Increased TAR1 (ratio of translocated segment 1 over the chromosome arm) emerged as an independent protective factor associated with an increase in alternate segregation (p = 0.004). Female sex and involvement of an acrocentric chromosome (Acr-ch) were independent risk factors that reduced alternate segregation proportions (p < 0.001). Notably, a higher TAR1 reduced the proportion of adjacent-1 segregation (p < 0.001); a longer translocated segment and female sex increased the risk of adjacent-2 segregation (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). Female sex and involvement of an Acr-ch enhanced the ratio of 3:1 segregation (p < 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively). In conclusion, autosomal reciprocal translocation carriers have reduced proportions of alternate segregation in blastocysts upon the involvement of an Acr-ch, female sex, and lower TAR1. These results may facilitate more appropriate genetic counseling for couples with autosomal reciprocal translocation regarding their chances of producing normal/balanced blastocysts.

Whole-genome analysis of a putative rare and complex interchromosomal reciprocal insertion: thorough investigations for a straightforward interpretation.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Should whole-genome investigations be considered systematically before a complex chromosomal abnormality preimplantation genetic testing for structural chromosomal rearrangements (PGT-SR) management is carried out using conventional cytogenetic techniques? DESIGN: A male carrying a putative rare interchromosomal reciprocal insertion (IRI) 46,XY,ins(14;?)(q11;?).ish der(14)ins(14;22)(q11.2;q11.2q11.2)(xcp14+,xcp22+,N25+,3'TRA/D+),der(22)ins(22;14)(q11.2;q11.2q11.2)(xcp22+,xcp14+,N25-,5'TRA/D+), and his partner were referred to our centre for preimplantation genetic testing analysis after three spontaneous miscarriages. Whole-genome sequencing was used to distinguish between the proposed IRI and an alternative explanation of reciprocal translocation. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used to detect all chromosome segments involved in this chromosomal rearrangement, to identify transferable normal and balanced embryos. RESULTS: Whole-genome sequencing allowed the determination of the number of chromosomal breakpoints involved in chromosomal rearrangement between chromosomes 14 and 22. Finally, only two breakpoints were identified instead of four in IRI rearrangements, which suggests a reciprocal translocation rearrangement. A probe strategy was established to highlight all chromosomal imbalances, whether IRI or reciprocal translocation, and preimplantation genetic testing cycles were achieved. CONCLUSION: Conventional cytogenetic techniques are not capable of identifying all complex chromosomal rearrangements, especially those involving centromeric regions and short arms of acrocentric chromosomes. The advent of new sequencing technologies has allowed for a better appreciation of genome complexity. In this study, whole-genome analysis provided additional information to explain the occurrence of genomic events and confirmed that the initial diagnosis of IRI identified by conventional cytogenetic techniques was, in fact, a simple reciprocal translocation. A reliable PGT-SR strategy was proposed for this couple to achieve their parental project.

Complex reciprocal translocations, more complex than initially thought: a case report.

OBJECTIVE: To present a case of a couple who experienced spontaneous abortion after the transfer of a preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) normal/balanced embryo. The embryo was later determined to have significant paternally inherited chromosome deletion that was not previously identified as part of a complex translocation. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Single infertility practice. PATIENTS: A 35-year-old patient with a history of five spontaneous abortions and her 36-years-old partner, a carrier of a balanced reciprocal translocation. INTERVENTIONS: In vitro fertilization with PGT-SR and follow-up genetic testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of a paternal reciprocal translocation, pregnancy outcome after PGT-SR, and follow-up genetic testing after the spontaneous abortion of a PGT-SR normal/balanced embryo. RESULTS: Karyotyping for a couple with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss identified a paternal reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 5 and 17 after G-banding analysis. In vitro fertilization with PGT-SR resulted in one normal/balanced embryo. The couple experienced a 9-week spontaneous abortion of the transfer of the embryo. Testing of product of conception identified a 3.2-Mb deletion on chromosome 17 resulting in the loss of 55 known genes and deemed likely pathogenic. Repeat karyotyping using G-banding and metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization identified an additional chromosomal translocation, a segment of chromosome 17 translocated to chromosome 6, the same segment of deoxyribonucleic acid absent from the fetus. CONCLUSIONS: Preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement cases are complex. Genetic testing must be completed with the best available technology by a reliable testing center. We, therefore, recommend that all chromosomal translocations detected by G-banding be further investigated with metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. When unexpected results occur in this patient population, testing beyond the standard of care may be required, including advanced molecular testing.

De novo balanced reciprocal translocation mosaic t(1;3)(q42;q25) detected by prenatal genetic diagnosis: a fetus conceived using preimplantation genetic testing due to a t(12;14)(q22;q13) balanced paternal reciprocal translocation.

INTRODUCTION: De novo balanced reciprocal translocations mosaicism in fetus conceived using preimplantation genetic testing from a different balanced translocation carrier parent has been rarely reported. METHODS: Chromosomal microarray analysis, karyotype analysis and fluorescent in situ hybridization were performed to verify the type and heredity of the rearrangement. STR analysis was conducted to identify potential contamination and verify kinship. In addition, a local BLAST engine was performed to locate potentially homologous segments which might contribute to the translocation in breakpoints of chromosome. RESULTS: A rare de novo balanced reciprocal translocations mosaicism mos 46,XY,t(1;3)(q42;q25)[40]/46,XY[39] was diagnosed in a fetus conceived using preimplantation genetic testing due to a 46,XY,t(12;14)(q22;q13) balanced translocation carrier father through multiplatform genetic techniques. Two of the largest continuous high homology segments were identified in chromosomal band 1q42.12 and 3q25.2. At the 21-months follow up, infant has achieved all psychomotor development milestones as well as growth within the normal reference range. CONCLUSION: We present a prenatal diagnosis of a rare de novo balanced reciprocal translocations mosaicism in a fetus who conceived by preimplantation genetic testing. The most reasonable driving mechanism was that a de novo mitotic error caused by nonallelic homologous recombination between 1q42.12 and 3q25.2 in a zygote within the first or early cell divisions, which results in a mosaic embryo with the variant present in a half proportion of cells.