Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther ; 38(5): 348-353, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35507946

RESUMEN

Purpose: NovaTears®+Omega-3 is a water-free eye drop solution with non-animal-derived omega-3 fatty acids. It allows to supplement omega-3 fatty acids directly in the tear film of patients with dry eye disease (DED). This post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study evaluated for the first time the effects on clinical signs and patient symptoms of DED, and safety and tolerability of NovaTears+Omega-3 (0.2%) eye drops, when used in accordance with its approved label. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, uncontrolled, open-label observational cohort study was performed in patients suffering from symptoms of evaporative DED. Patients were treated 4 times daily bilaterally according to the instructions for use for 8 weeks, and standard of care clinical end points were assessed at baseline and follow-up. The trial was conducted at 2 investigational sites in Germany, Europe. Results: Thirty-six patients were included and 33 completed the study. NovaTears+Omega-3 (0.2%) showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in various clinical signs, such as total corneal staining, tear film break-up time, and Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) score, as well as in symptoms measured by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI©) and visual analog scales over the 8-week treatment period with change from baseline P values all <0.0001. No worsening of any safety parameter (intraocular pressure, slit-lamp examination, visual acuity) was observed, and no adverse event was reported throughout the study. Conclusions: In this observational PMCF study, NovaTears+Omega-3 was safe and well tolerated. Treatment over an 8-week period resulted in significantly improved clinical signs and subjective symptoms in patients with evaporative dry eye. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04521465).


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3 , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/diagnóstico , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/efectos adversos , Humanos , Soluciones Oftálmicas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Lágrimas , Agua
2.
World Neurosurg ; 80(3-4): S30.e11-6, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23268197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In preparation for a multicenter study, a protocol was written on how to perform surgical targeting of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, based on the lead implantation experience in patients with treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) at the Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven (UZ Leuven). When analyzing the postoperative images, we were struck by the fact that the difference between the postoperative position of the leads and the planned position seemed larger than expected. METHODS: The precision of targeting in four patients with severe OCD who received bilateral model 3391 leads (Medtronic) was compared with the precision of targeting in the last seven patients who underwent surgery at UZ Leuven for movement disorders (four with Parkinson disease and three with essential tremor; all received bilateral leads). Because the leads implanted in six of the seven patients with movement disorders were model 3387 leads (Medtronic), targeting precision was also analyzed in four patients with OCD in whom model 3387 leads were implanted in the same target as the other patients with OCD. RESULTS: In the patients with OCD, every implanted lead deviated at least 1.3 mm from its intended position in at least one of three directions (lateral, anteroposterior, and depth), whereas in the patients with movement disorders, the maximal deviation of any of all implanted leads was 1.3 mm. The deviations in lead placement were comparable in patients with OCD who received a model 3387 implant and patients who received a model 3391 implant. In the patients with OCD, all leads were implanted more posteriorly than planned. CONCLUSIONS: The cause of the posterior deviation could not be determined with certainty. The most likely cause was an increased mechanical resistance of the brain tissue along the trajectory when following the targeting protocol compared with the trajectories classically used for subthalamic nucleus or ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus stimulation.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Electrodos Implantados , Trastornos del Movimiento/cirugía , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/terapia , Núcleos Septales/fisiología , Encéfalo/patología , Encéfalo/cirugía , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/efectos adversos , Temblor Esencial/terapia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/patología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/psicología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA