Adropin attenuates pancreatitis­associated lung injury through PPARγ phosphorylation­related macrophage polarization.

Acute pancreatitis (AP)­associated lung injury (ALI) is a critical complication of AP. Adropin is a regulatory protein of immune metabolism. The present study aimed to explore the immunomodulatory effects of adropin on AP­ALI. For this purpose, serum samples of patients with AP were collected and the expression levels of serum adropin were detected using ELISA. Animal models of AP and adropin knockout (Adro­KO) were constructed, and adropin expression in serum and lung tissues was investigated. The levels of fibrosis and apoptosis were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining, Masson's staining and immunohistochemistry of in lung tissue. M1/M2 type macrophages in the lungs were detected using immunofluorescence staining, western blot analysis and reverse transcription­quantitative PCR. As shown by the results, adropin expression was decreased in AP. In the Adro­KO + L­arginine (L­Arg) group, macrophage infiltration, fibrosis and apoptosis were increased. The expression of peroxisome proliferator­ activated receptor γ (PPARγ) was downregulated, and the macrophages exhibited a trend towards M1 polarization in the Adro­KO + L­Arg group. Adropin exogenous supplement attenuated the levels of fibrosis and apoptosis in the model of AP. Adropin exogenous supplement also increased PPARγ expression by the regulation of the phosphorylation levels, which was associated with M2 macrophage polarization. On the whole, the findings of the present study suggest that adropin promotes the M2 polarization of lung macrophages and reduces the severity of AP­ALI by regulating the function of PPARγ through the regulation of its phosphorylation level.

Biological Screening and Crystallographic Studies of Hydroxy γ-Lactone Derivatives to Investigate PPARγ Phosphorylation Inhibition.

PPARγ represents a key target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. To avoid serious adverse effects related to the PPARγ agonism profile of traditional antidiabetic drugs, a new opportunity is represented by the development of molecules acting as inhibitors of PPARγ phosphorylation by the cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5). Their mechanism of action is mediated by the stabilization of the PPARγ ß-sheet containing Ser273 (Ser245 in PPARγ isoform 1 nomenclature). In this paper, we report the identification of new γ-hydroxy-lactone-based PPARγ binders from the screening of an in-house library. These compounds exhibit a non-agonist profile towards PPARγ, and one of them prevents Ser245 PPARγ phosphorylation by acting mainly on PPARγ stabilization and exerting a weak CDK5 inhibitory effect.

Selective PPARγ modulator diosmin improves insulin sensitivity and promotes browning of white fat.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a master regulator of adipocyte differentiation, glucolipid metabolism, and inflammation. Thiazolidinediones are PPARγ full agonists with potent insulin-sensitizing effects, whereas their oral usage is restricted because of unwanted side effects, including obesity and cardiovascular risks. Here, via virtual screening, microscale thermophoresis analysis, and molecular confirmation, we demonstrate that diosmin, a natural compound of wide and long-term clinical use, is a selective PPARγ modulator that binds to PPARγ and blocks PPARγ phosphorylation with weak transcriptional activity. Local diosmin administration in subcutaneous fat (inguinal white adipose tissue [iWAT]) improved insulin sensitivity and attenuated obesity via enhancing browning of white fat and energy expenditure. Besides, diosmin ameliorated inflammation in WAT and liver and reduced hepatic steatosis. Of note, we determined that iWAT local administration of diosmin did not exhibit obvious side effects. Taken together, the present study demonstrated that iWAT local delivery of diosmin protected mice from diet-induced insulin resistance, obesity, and fatty liver by blocking PPARγ phosphorylation, without apparent side effects, making it a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of metabolic diseases.

CDK5 Inhibition Abrogates TNBC Stem-Cell Property and Enhances Anti-PD-1 Therapy.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, in which the higher frequency of cancer stem cells (CSCs) correlates with the poor clinical outcome. An aberrant activation of CDK5 is found to associate with TNBC progression closely. CDK5 mediates PPARγ phosphorylation at its Ser 273, which induces CD44 isoform switching from CD44s to CD44v, resulting in an increase of stemness of TNBC cells. Blocking CDK5/pho-PPARγ significantly reduces CD44v+ BCSCs population in tumor tissues, thus abrogating metastatic progression in TNBC mouse model. Strikingly, diminishing stemness transformation reverses immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhances anti-PD-1 therapeutic efficacy on TNBC. Mechanistically, CDK5 switches the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of PPARγ and directly protects ESRP1 from a ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. This finding firstly indicates that CDK5 blockade can be a potent strategy to diminish stemness transformation and increase the response to PD-1 blockade in TNBC therapy.

Pioglitazone Reduces ß Amyloid Levels via Inhibition of PPARγ Phosphorylation in a Neuronal Model of Alzheimer's Disease.

It has been demonstrated that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) can regulate the transcription of its target gene, insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), and thus enhance the expression of the IDE protein. The protein can degrade ß amyloid (Aß), a core pathological product of Alzheimer's disease (AD). PPARγ can also regulate the transcription of other target gene, ß-amyloid cleavage enzyme 1 (BACE1), and thus inhibit the expression of the BACE1 protein. BACE1 can hydrolyze amyloid precursor protein (APP), the precursor of Aß. In adipose tissue, PPARγ agonists can inhibit the phosphorylation of PPARγ by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5), which in turn affects the expression of target genes regulated by PPARγ. PPARγ agonists may also exert inhibitory effects on the phosphorylation of PPARγ in the brain, thereby affecting the expression of the aforementioned PPARγ target genes and reducing Aß levels. The present study confirmed this hypothesis by showing that PPARγ agonist pioglitazone attenuated the neuronal apoptosis of primary rat hippocampal neurons induced by Aß1-42, downregulated CDK5 expression, weakened the binding of CDK5 to PPARγ, reduced PPARγ phosphorylation, increased the expression of PPARγ and IDE, decreased the expression of BACE1, reduced APP production, and downregulated intraneuronal Aß1-42 levels. These effects were inhibited by the PPARγ antagonist GW9662. After CDK5 silencing with CDK5 shRNA, the above effect of pioglitazone was not observed, except when upregulating the expression of PPARγ in Aß1-42 treated neurons. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that pioglitazone could inhibit the phosphorylation of PPARγ in vitro by inhibiting CDK5 expression, which in turn affected the expression of PPARγ target genes Ide and Bace1, thereby promoting Aß degradation and reducing Aß production. This reduced Aß levels in the brain, thereby exerting neuroprotective effects in an AD model.

Exploring the mechanism of PPARγ phosphorylation mediated by CDK5.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor with a key role in metabolic processes and is target of CDK5 kinase phosphorylation at S245 (S273 in PPARγ isoform 2), thereby inducing insulin resistance. A remarkable effort has been addressed to find PPARγ ligands that inhibit S245 phosphorylation, but the poor understanding in this field challenges the design of such ligands. Here, through computational and biophysical methods, we explored an experimentally validated model of PPARγ-CDK5 complex, and we presented K261, K263 or K265, which are conserved in mammals, as important anchor residues for this interaction. In addition, we observed, from structural data analysis, that PPARγ ligands that inhibit S245 phosphorylation are not in direct contact with these residues; but induce structural modifications in PPARγ:CDK5/p25 interface. In summary, our PPARγ and CDK5/p25 interaction analyses open new possibilities for the rational design of novel inhibitors that impair S245 phosphorylation.

Effects of telmisartan on TNFα induced PPARγ phosphorylation and insulin resistance in adipocytes.

BACKGROUND: Telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and a partial agonist of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ). It has been shown to significantly enhance insulin sensitivity in clinical studies and in vitro experiments. However, the effect of telmisartan on PPARγ in adipocytes remains unknown. METHODS: 3T3-L1 adipocytes were incubated with tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) to simulate growth under an inflammatory condition. On this basis, adipocytes were treated with telmisartan at different concentrations for 1 h. Then, the phosphorylation level of PPARγ, glucose uptake, mRNA levels of PPARγ downstream genes and adiponectin secretion of adipocytes were analyzed. RESULTS: Telmisartan reduced the phosphorylation level of PPARγ, altered mRNA expressions of adiponectin, adipsin, leptin, FABP4, GLUT4 and CAP, and promoted the secretion of adiponectin. Furthermore, telmisartan treatment restored the decrease of cellular glucose uptake due to TNFα stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Telmisartan regulated PPARγ phosphorylation and its downstream gene expressions, promoted glucose uptake and acted as an overall insulin sensitizing agent in adipocytes. The specific phosphorylation site of PPARγ affected by telmisartan, the mechanism of telmisartan in regulating PPARγ phosphorylation, and whether the effects of telmisartan in adipocytes is responsible for its whole-body insulin sensitizing effect require further exploration.

PAM, OLA, and LNA are Differentially Taken Up and Trafficked Via Different Metabolic Pathways in Porcine Adipocytes.

Dietary fatty acids have different effects on fat deposition in pigs. To clarify the underlying mechanisms of this difference, we compared the metabolism of palmitic (PAM, saturated), oleic (OLA, monounsaturated) and linoleic acid (LNA, polyunsaturated) in porcine adipocytes treated with 100 µM PAM, OLA or LNA. We observed that the adipocytes incubated with LNA accumulated more lipids compared with those treated with PAM and OLA. We then probed the metabolism of these fatty acids in porcine adipocytes by using isotope-labelled fatty acids. The results showed that 42% of the [1-14C] LNA, 34% of the [1-14C] PAM and 28% of the [1-14C] OLA were recovered in the cellular lipids. The gene expression analyses showed that LNA significantly increased the expression of adipogenesis- and oxidation-related genes including PPARγ, C/EBPα, ap2 and NRF1. In addition, the cells incubated with LNA showed a decreased Ser112 phosphorylation in PPARγ compared to those incubated with PAM and OLA. Furthermore, when PPARγ Ser112 phosphorylation was inhibited, no significant difference in the triacylglycerol contents in the adipocytes was observed. These results showed the dietary fatty acids had different metabolism pathways in porcine adipocytes, and LNA significantly promoted lipid accumulation, probably by regulating PPARγ phosphorylation in adipocytes.

DHA increases adiponectin expression more effectively than EPA at relative low concentrations by regulating PPARγ and its phosphorylation at Ser273 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

BACKGROUND: Enhancing circulating adiponectin is considered as a potential approach for the prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) were reported to increase adiponectin by previous studies using a mixture of them. However, their individual effects on adiponectin and the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. In the present study, we observed and compared the individual effect of DHA and EPA on adiponectin in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and further tested whether DHA or EPA regulated adiponectin by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and its phosphorylation at Ser273 to provide a plausible explanation for their distinct actions. METHODS: Firstly, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with different doses of DHA or EPA for 24 h. Secondly, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with DHA or EPA in the presence or absence of GW9662. Thirdly, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were pretreated with DHA or EPA for 24 h, followed by being respectively co-incubated with tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) or roscovitine for another 2 h. Bovine serum albumin treatment served as the control. After treatments, cellular and secreted adiponectin, cellular PPARγ and its phosphorylation at Ser273 were determined. RESULTS: Compared with the control, DHA increased cellular and secreted adiponectin at 50 and 100 µmol/L, while EPA increased them at 100 and 200 µmol/L. Adiponectin expressions in DHA treated groups were significantly higher than those in EPA treated groups at 50 and 100 µmol/L. Both DHA and EPA enhanced PPARγ expression, but DHA was more effective. GW9662 blocked DHA- and EPA-induced increases in PPARγ as well as adiponectin. Remarkably, an opposite regulation of PPARγ phosphorylation was detected after fatty acids treatment: DHA inhibited it but EPA stimulated it. TNF-α blocked DHA-induced decrease in PPARγ phosphorylation, which eventually led to a decrease in adiponectin. Roscovitine blocked EPA-induced increase in PPARγ phosphorylation, but the corresponding increase in adiponectin was non-significant. CONCLUSION: DHA compared with EPA led to a greater increase in cellular and secreted adiponectin at relative low concentrations by increasing PPARγ expression and inhibiting its phosphorylation at Ser273. DHA may be more beneficial than EPA in reducing risks of NCDs.