Comprehensive assessment of pain characteristics, quality of life, and pain management in cancer patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Pain is the most common complaint among cancer patients, significantly impairing their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There is limited evidence on the characteristics of pain among cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of pain, factors influencing pain intensity, and the association of pain severity with quality of life (QoL) among cancer patients. Secondary objectives included investigating perceived barriers to pain management and medication adherence among these patients. METHODS: This multi-center, cross-sectional study enrolled adult patients (over 18 years old) with reported cancer diagnoses experiencing pain. Socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, educational status), clinical characteristics (e.g. cancer diagnosis, staging), and pain characteristics (e.g., duration, type, location, medicines used for pain management, etc.) were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using the Numeric rating scale (NRS), Pain management Index, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Barriers Questionnaire II, Medication Adherence Rating Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Four hundred and eight patients participated in the study. The mean ± SD age was 54.87 ± 15.65, with 226 patients (55.4%) being female. The most common cancer diagnoses were cervical (17.6%), lung (11.8%), and colon/rectum (12.0%) cancers. The most common pain locations were the head and neck (27.0%); a majority (55.6%) reported pain duration of more than 3 months. Nociceptive pain was reported by 42.4% of patients; the mean ± SD of NRS was 4.31 ± 2.69, with 32.4% of patients experiencing moderate pain. Patients with mixed pain type (B = 1.458, p < 0.001) or pain in multiple sites (B = 1.175, p < 0.001), lower Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (B = -1.308, p < 0.001), and specific cancer diagnoses such as prostate (B = -2.045, p = 0.002), pancreatic (B = 1.852, p = 0.004), oesophageal (B = 1.674, p = 0.012), and ovarian cancer (B = 1.967, p = 0.047), experienced varying degrees of increased NRS score. The combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment modality was associated with a lower NRS score (B = -0.583, p = 0.017). A significant inverse relationship was observed between pain severity and global health status/QoL (B = -37.36, p < 0.001. Key barriers to pain management included moderate perceptions of physiological effects, communication issues between doctors and patients, and concerns about the harmful effects of pain medicine. The prevalence of non-adherence to pain medications was 13.97%. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study highlights the multi-faceted nature of pain management and QoL for cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of pain perception in cancer patients, with mixed pain types, pain in multiple sites, lower KPS, and specific cancer diagnoses, all contributing significantly to pain severity. Additionally, pain severity was associated with declining QoL. These findings contribute valuable insights into the complex aspects of cancer pain and its broader implications for the well-being of patients, offering a foundation for targeted interventions and improved pain management strategies in the context of cancer care in low-resource settings.

More Movement, Less Bodily Pain? Findings From a Large, Representative Multi-District Aging Study in Ghana.

OBJECTIVE: The association of physical activity (PA) with pain has been characterized. Although the literature largely comes from high-income countries, the mechanistic pathways underlying this association remain unknown, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aim to examine the association between meeting the World Health Organization (WHO) PA guidelines and pain among aging adults and identify the factors that may mediate this association. DESIGN: We used a quantitative cross-sectional study design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Representative data from adults aged ≥50 years who participated in the Aging, Health, Psychological Well-being, and Health-seeking Behavior Study were used. METHODS: PA was defined using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Self-reported pain experience using a cross-culturally validated item over the past month assessed pain severity. Adjusted multivariable ordinal logistic regression and mediation models quantified the hypothesized associations. RESULTS: The analysis included 1201 adults (mean 66.1 ± 11.9 years; 63.3% female). After adjusting for confounders, adhering to the WHO-recommended PA guidelines was associated with 42% lower odds for severe/extreme pain [odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77]. The association was much stronger among men (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.85) than women (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.87). The PA-pain association was explained by functional limitations (84.7%), self-rated health (76.6%), sleep problems (20.4%), and injury (6.6%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Moving more was associated with less pain in older adults from LMICs. Interventions for pain management in old age may focus on enhancing compliance with PA doses, particularly in LMICs. However, longitudinal data will need to confirm these findings.

Identifying significant structural factors associated with knee pain severity in patients with osteoarthritis using machine learning.

Our main objective was to use machine learning methods to identify significant structural factors associated with pain severity in knee osteoarthritis patients. Additionally, we assessed the potential of various classes of imaging data using machine learning techniques to gauge knee pain severity. The data of semi-quantitative assessments of knee radiographs, semi-quantitative assessments of knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MRI images from 567 individuals in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) were utilized to train a series of machine learning models. Models were constructed using five machine learning methods: random forests (RF), support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), and Bayesian (Bayes). Employing tenfold cross-validation, we selected the best-performing models based on the area under the curve (AUC). The study results indicate no significant difference in performance among models using different imaging data. Subsequently, we employed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract features from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and class activation mapping (CAM) was utilized to generate saliency maps, highlighting regions associated with knee pain severity. A radiologist reviewed the images, identifying specific lesions colocalized with the CAM. The review of 421 knees revealed that effusion/synovitis (30.9%) and cartilage loss (30.6%) were the most frequent abnormalities associated with pain severity. Our study suggests cartilage loss and synovitis/effusion lesions as significant structural factors affecting pain severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Furthermore, our study highlights the potential of machine learning for assessing knee pain severity using radiographs.

The association between changes in clinical pain severity and IL-6 reactivity among patients undergoing total knee Arthroplasty: The moderating role of change in insomnia.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is linked to an enhanced release of interleukin-6 (IL-6). Increased levels of IL-6 are associated with greater pain and insomnia. While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) typically results in the reduction of pain, for a subgroup of patients, pain does not improve. Understanding patients' propensity to upregulate IL-6 may provide insight into variation in the clinical success of TKA for improving pain, and insomnia may play an important modulatory role. We investigated the association between pre- and post-surgical changes in clinical pain and IL-6 reactivity, and whether change in insomnia moderated this association. Patients (n = 39) with KOA came in-person before and 3-months after TKA. At both visits, patients completed validated measures of clinical pain and insomnia, as well as underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST). Blood samples were collected to analyze IL-expression both before and after QST procedures to assess changes in IL-6 in response to QST (IL-6 reactivity). Patients were categorized into two groups based on change in clinical pain from pre- to post-surgery: 1) pain decreased > 2 points (pain improved) and 2) pain did not decrease > 2 points (pain did not improve). Based on this definition, 49 % of patients had improved pain at 3-months. Among patients with improved pain, IL-6 reactivity significantly decreased from pre- to post-surgery, whereas there was no significant change in IL-6 reactivity among those whose pain did not improve. There was also a significant interaction between pain status and change in insomnia, such that among patients whose insomnia decreased over time, improved pain was significantly associated with a reduction in IL-6 reactivity. However, among patients whose insomnia increased over time, pain status and change in IL-6 reactivity were not significantly associated. Our findings suggest that the resolution of clinical pain after TKA may be associated with discernible alterations in pro-inflammatory responses that can be measured under controlled laboratory conditions, and this association may be moderated by perioperative changes in insomnia. Randomized controlled trials which carefully characterize the phenotypic features of patients are needed to understand how and for whom behavioral interventions may be beneficial in modulating inflammation, pain, and insomnia.

Beyond the Self-Reports: A Review on Objective Pain Measurement and Its Implications.

Current methods of pain measurement are inadequate in capturing the complexity of the pain experience. This limitation arises mainly because these methods tend to overlook the multiple dimensions of pain during assessment, heavily relying on self-reported measures, which inherently have their drawbacks. Self-reported measures aim to gauge the pain severity experienced by an individual, based solely on their perception of the most intense pain sensation. However, these measures are prone to various biases and may not accurately reflect the actual pain experienced. To overcome these limitations, a new system of pain assessment is necessary, which minimizes subjective involvement and provides a more accurate representation of pain. The 'Pain Calculator' is a newly developed tool that has demonstrated promising accuracy in measuring somatic pain in the low back region. This tool effectively overcomes the subjective biases characteristic of the self-reported measures and provides a reliable and clinically feasible alternative to the existing pain assessment tools.

Risk of Unfavorable Trajectories of Chronic Pain Severity-Results of a Longitudinal Study in School Children.

Chronic pain is a common burden among children and adolescents associated with impairments in many aspects of life. Higher pain severity increases this burden. Subsequently, it is important to identify factors predicting the course of pain severity, classified by the chronic pain grading (CPG). In a 1-year longitudinal assessment of a general school-age population (N = 2,280), we aimed to identify biopsychosocial factors associated with CPG trajectories. We focused on children and adolescents who reported chronic pain at the start of the year (N = 689). Using longitudinal latent class analysis, we identified 3 classes of CPG trajectories over 1 year: 1) the "pain recovery group" exhibited initially moderate CPG scores that rapidly and consistently declined to a pain-free level, 2) the "continuously moderate pain severity group" displayed initially high CPG levels with a mild decline over time, and 3) the "continuously low pain severity group" had initially moderate CPG levels, which only slightly declined. In comparison to the pain recovery group, the continuously moderate pain severity group presented with heightened levels of anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.02, 1.24], P = .023), depression (OR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01, 1.19], P = .029), and affective pain perception (OR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.02, 1.18], P = .010) and were more likely to be female (OR = 2.14, 95% CI [1.05, 4.35], P = .036). The continuously low pain severity group was predominantly female (OR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.10, 2.49], P = .016) compared to the pain recovery group. In conclusion, girls and individuals with impaired psychological well-being more often exhibit unfavorable trajectories of chronic pain severity. PERSPECTIVE: Pediatric chronic pain patients, particularly females and those exhibiting elevated anxiety or depression scores or heightened affective pain perception warrant special attention in health care. These individuals have a greater risk of an unfavorable trajectory of chronic pain severity and might need more urgent and specialized treatment.

Association of Muscle Strength, Psychological Factors, and Central Sensitization With Movement-Evoked Pain in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: The BACKFIT Project.

BACKGROUND: People with chronic pain might evade certain movements to prevent their experience of pain. Movement-evoked pain (MEP) might induce lower functionality during daily activities. HYPOTHESIS: (1) MEP after physical fitness tests would vary depending on the main musculature involved in the test; (2) physical and psychological factors would be associated with MEP in patients with NSCLBP. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: A total of 104 (69 women) patients aged 51.0 ± 10.3 years with NSCLBP participated. MEP was measured with a visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and immediately after performing each physical fitness test, that is, the Biering-Sørensen, prone bridging, handgrip, chair-stand, and 8-foot time-up-and-go tests, measuring back extensor, back flexor, upper- and lower-body muscle strength, and motor agility, respectively. Global muscle strength was calculated with normalized index (z-score) procedure. Depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and central sensitization were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory II, State Trait Anxiety Inventory I, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), respectively. RESULTS: Patients showed greater pain after completion of the Biering-Sørensen (mean difference 95% CI, 0.02, 1.11), prone bridging (0.15, 1.21), lower pain after handgrip (-1.46, -0.52), and the 8-foot time-up-and-go (-1.43, 0.46) tests (all P ≤ 0.04). Lower global muscular strength (ß between -0.18 and -0.30), and greater pain catastrophizing (ß = 0.16), and CSI scoring (ß between 0.18 and 0.27) were associated with greater MEP (all P ≤ 0.04). CONCLUSION: Greater MEP was observed after tests measuring core musculature strength than after tests measuring distal (limbs) strength and agility. Greater MEP was overall associated with lower muscle strength, greater pain catastrophizing, and central sensitization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fitness testing might be implemented as a complementary tool for the monitoring of NSCLBP in clinical settings.

The association of prognostic awareness with quality of life, spiritual well-being, psychological distress, and pain severity in patients with advanced cancer: Results from the APPROACH Study in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced cancer patients' understanding of their illness is key for making informed treatment decisions. Despite the known importance of patients' awareness of their disease prognosis, it is debatable whether this awareness is positively, negatively, or not associated with clinical and psychological outcomes among patients with advanced cancer. This paper aims to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with prognostic awareness and its association with quality of life (QoL), spiritual well-being, pain control, and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer in Indonesia. METHODS: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was part of a multicountry study titled "Asian Patient Perspectives Regarding Oncology Awareness, Care and Health (APPROACH)." Patients were asked what they knew about their cancer and treatment. QoL and spiritual well-being were measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-Sp) questionnaire. Psychological distress experienced by patients was recorded via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Pain severity was also assessed. Data from 160 patients were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients who participated, 55 (34.4%) were unaware of their cancer stage. Those who were aware of their stage of cancer were younger than those who were not aware (45.7 years vs 50.4 years, p = .015). There was no significant difference in spiritual well-being and other domains of QoL between those who were aware and those who were not aware of their advanced cancer stage. There was also no significant difference in anxiety depression or pain severity, even after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics. SIGNIFICANT OF RESULTS: Given the high prevalence of patients who wrongly thought their cancer was curable, more could be done to improve disease and prognostic understanding among patients with advanced cancer in Indonesia. Those who were aware of their advanced cancer stage did not have a poorer QoL, nor did they have more anxiety or depression than those who were unaware. This finding suggests that concerns about the negative impact of prognostic disclosure may be unfounded.

Multisite Pain and Intensity were Associated with History Fall among Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Purpose: This study examined the independent associations among multisite pain, pain intensity, and the risk of falls, including a history of falls in the previous 12 months and frequent falls (≥ two falls vs one or two falls) among community-dwelling older adults. Methods: A cross-sectional design from Wave 2 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project was used. Data on pain intensity and location (45 sites) over the past 4 weeks were collected. Multisite pain was categorized into four groups: none, one, two, and three or more sites. The main outcomes of falls were a history of falls and frequent falls. The covariates included age, sex, race, body mass index, education, medications, and comorbidities. Results: Among 3,196 participants in Wave 2, 2,697 were included because of missing key variables related to pain and fall history. The prevalence of falls and frequent falls were 30.3% (n = 817) and 12.6% (n = 339), respectively. Multisite pain at ≥ three sites (odds ratio (OR) 2.04, confidence interval (CI) [1.62, 2.57]; p < 0.001) and two sites (OR 1.72, 95% CI [1.30, 2.27]; p < 0.001) was significantly associated with an increased risk of falls. An increase in pain intensity was significantly associated with an increased risk of fall (OR 1.28, 95% CI [1.15, 1.44], p < 0.001), independent of multisite pain. Multisite pain at ≥3 sites (OR 2.19, 95% CI [1.56, 3.07], p < 0.001) and 2 sites (OR 1.54, 95% CI [1.01, 2.34], p = 0.045) was associated with an increased risk of frequent falls. An increase in pain intensity was associated with risk of frequent falls (OR 1.64, 95% CI [1.40, 1.91], p < 0.001), independent of multisite pain. Conclusion: Multisite pain and pain intensity were associated with a history of falls and frequent falls among older adults, emphasizing the need for routine pain evaluation to develop fall prevention strategies in this population.

Examining pain severity in women with rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of pain self-efficacy and perceived partner's emotional support.

BACKGROUND: Empirical data suggest that psychosocial factors, such as pain self-efficacy (PSE) and emotional support from a partner, may alleviate the suffering caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pain. However, the data are ambiguous and warrant a more comprehensive investigation into the effect of these factors on the severity of RA pain. The objective of the present study was to assess the significance of PSE and emotional support from a partner in relation to pain severity among women with RA. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: The study included a sample of 196 women diagnosed with RA with the mean age of 41.54. The study employed the following measures: Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale, Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire, and Communication Based Emotional Support Scale. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that higher PSE emerged as the strongest predictor for lower pain severity across all components of RA pain. However, the impact of the partner's emotional support on pain severity was not as evident and varied depending on the specific pain component. Furthermore, the use of pain medications significantly predicted three out of four pain components. Mediation analysis revealed that perceived emotional support from a partner directly affected women's RA pain intensity, as well as indirectly through the PSE as a mediator. Moderated mediation analysis demonstrated that the association between PSE and pain severity weakened as the duration of RA increased. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing women's PSE and providing appropriate training for their partners to offer effective emotional support may play a crucial role in the treatment of RA.

Association between self-reported pain severity and characteristics of United States adults (age ≥50 years) who used opioids.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the associations between the characteristics of United States (US) adults (≥50 years) who used opioids and self-reported pain severity using a nationally representative dataset. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional database study used 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data to identify US adults aged ≥50 years with self-reported pain within the past 4 weeks and ≥1 opioid prescription within the calendar year (n = 1,077). Weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis modeled associations between various characteristics and self-reported pain severity (quite a bit/extreme vs less/moderate pain). RESULTS: The adjusted logistic regression model indicated that greater odds of reporting quite a bit/extreme pain was associated with the following: age 50-64 vs ≥65 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-2.54), non-Hispanic vs Hispanic (AOR = 2.0; CI = 1.18-3.39), unemployed vs employed (AOR = 2.01; CI = 1.33-3.05), no health insurance vs private insurance (AOR = 6.80; CI = 1.43-32.26), fair/poor vs excellent/very good/good health (AOR = 3.10; CI = 2.19-4.39), fair/poor vs excellent/very good/good mental health (AOR = 2.16; CI = 1.39-3.38), non-smoker vs smoker (AOR = 1.80; CI = 1.19-2.71), and instrumental activity of daily living, yes vs no (AOR = 2.27; CI = 1.30-3.96). CONCLUSION: Understanding the several characteristics associated with pain severity in US adults ≥50 years who used an opioid may help transform healthcare approaches to prevention, education, and management of pain severity in later life.

Cognitive flexibility training for chronic pain: a randomized clinical study.

Introduction: Previous studies suggest an association between cognitive flexibility and development of chronic pain after surgery. It is not known whether cognitive flexibility can be improved in patients with chronic pain. Objectives: This study tested whether a neurocognitive training program results in improved cognitive flexibility and pain in patients with chronic pain. Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized study investigating 5-week daily neurocognitive training in patients with chronic pain. Participants (n = 145) were randomized into neurocognitive training or care as usual, and they completed assessments at baseline, posttreatment, and 3 months. The treatment group was asked to spend 35 minutes daily completing a program with tasks on cognitive flexibility, memory, attention, and speed. The primary outcome was performance on the neurocognitive performance test (NCPT). Secondary outcomes included levels of pain interference and severity. Results: At 5 weeks, the treatment group showed greater improvements on NCPT compared with the control group (d = 0.37); effect size was smaller at 3 months (d = 0.18). The treatment group reported lower pain severity at 5 weeks (d = 0.16) and 3 months (d = 0.39) than the control group, but pain interference was only lower at 3 months (d = 0.20). Conclusions: Outcomes suggest that using neurocognitive training to modify cognitive flexibility in patients with chronic pain may improve pain severity. This study provided effect size estimates to inform sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials to test the effectiveness of neurocognitive interventions for the prevention and treatment of chronic pain.

Measurement of the Association of Pain with Clinical Characteristics in Oral Cancer Patients at Diagnosis and Prior to Cancer Treatment.

Aim: Oral cancer patients suffer pain at the site of the cancer, which degrades quality of life (QoL). The University of California San Francisco Oral Cancer Pain Questionnaire (UCSFOCPQ), the only validated instrument specifically designed for measuring oral cancer pain, measures the intensity and nature of pain and the level of functional restriction due to pain. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare pain reported by untreated oral cancer patients on the UCSFOCPQ with pain they reported on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), an instrument widely used to evaluate cancer and non-cancer pain. Patients and Methods: The correlation between pain measured by the two instruments and clinical characteristics were analyzed. Thirty newly diagnosed oral cancer patients completed the UCSFOCPQ and the BPI. Results: Pain severity measurements made by the UCSFOCPQ and BPI were concordant; however, the widely used BPI average pain over 24 hours score appeared less sensitive to detect association of oral cancer pain with clinical characteristics of patients prior to treatment (nodal status, depth of invasion, DOI). A BPI average score that includes responses to questions that measure both pain severity and interference with function performs similarly to the UCSFOCPQ in detection of associations with nodal status, pathologic T stage (pT stage), stage and depth of invasion (DOI). Conclusion: Pain assessment instruments that measure sensory and interference dimensions of oral cancer pain correlate with biologic features and clinical behavior.

Understanding chronic pain in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 using the Neurofibromatosis Pain Module (NFPM).

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that can cause an individual significant chronic pain (CP). CP affects quality of life and daily functioning, yet there are limited effective treatments for CP within NF1. The current study describes the impact of CP using the Neurofibromatosis Pain Module (NFPM). The NFPM is a self-reported clinical assessment that evaluates the impact of CP across multiple domains (e.g., interference, severity, tolerance, and symptomology) and three prioritized pain regions. A cross-sectional study (N = 242) asked adults with NF1 to describe and rate their pain using the NFPM. The results indicated that they reported moderate pain severity (M = 6.6, SD = 2.0) on a 0-10 scale, that 54% (n = 131) had been in pain at least 24 days in the last 30, for 75% (n = 181) sleep was affected, and 16% reported that nothing was effective in reducing their CP for their primary pain region. The current results extend previously published work on CP within adults with NF1 and indicate that more emphasis on understanding and ameliorating CP is required. The NFPM is a sensitive clinical measure that provides qualitative and quantitative responses to inform medical providers about changes in CP.

Pain Characteristics of Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Comparison Between Gender and Different Emotional States.

BACKGROUND: Generalized pain is the core symptom of fibromyalgia (FM). Few studies have described FM's different pain characteristics under various conditions. OBJECTIVE: To explore the pain characteristics of patients with FM of different gender and emotional states. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: A medical center in Beijing, People's Republic of China. METHODS: A total of 197 patients with FM were recruited from an outpatient clinic. Three distinct instruments were used to assess their pain characteristics: the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) to assess pain severity, the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) to assess the number of pain regions, and the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) to assess pain qualities. The Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale were used to assess patients' emotional states. An independent 2-sample t test, chi-squared test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze gender pain characteristics differences and different emotional states (with/without anxiety, with/without depression). RESULTS: Pain severity on the NRS-11 was 7 (5-8), the number of pain regions determined by WPI was 13 (10-16), and the total score of different pain qualities from the SF-MPQ-2 was 2.36 (1.68-3.73) in all patients with FM. The most frequently reported regions of pain were the right shoulder girdle (89.34%), left shoulder girdle (88.32%), upper back (85.28%), and neck (81.73%). The most frequently reported pain qualities were tiredness/exhaustion (97.46%), aching pain (94.42%), numbness (78.68%), cold/freezing pain (75.63%), and tenderness (75.13%). Women patients reported more severe pain and numbness, less frequent chest pain, and shooting pain than men patients did. Patients with FM and anxiety experienced more frequent and more severe feelings of punishing/cruel thoughts, fearfulness, sickening, and tenderness; more frequent jaw pain and cold-freezing pain; more severe pain caused by light touch and tiredness/exhaustion; less frequent lower leg pain than those without anxiety did. Patients with FM and depression reported more frequent and more severe pain caused by light touch; more frequent tenderness; more severe feelings of tiredness/exhaustion, sickening,fearfulness, and punishing/cruel thoughts; and less frequent and less severe piercing pain than those without depression did. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study are its single-center design and lack of objective pain indicators. CONCLUSION: Gender significantly affected pain severity, chest pain, numbness, and shooting pain. Jaw pain, lower leg pain, cold/freezing pain, tenderness, pain caused by light touch, piercing pain, and pain-affective descriptors are closely related to emotional states in FM. A comprehensive understanding of pain characteristics in patients with FM would be helpful for disease education, diagnosis, and treatment.

An observational study of pain severity, cannabis use, and benefit expenditures in work disability.

OBJECTIVE: This study pools two cohorts of workers in Ontario interviewed 18 months following a disabling work-related injury to estimate the association between pain severity, cannabis use, and disability benefit expenditures. METHODS: Among 1650 workers, disability benefit expenditures obtained from administrative records were combined with self-reported measures of pain symptoms and cannabis use. Disability benefit expenditures comprised wage replacement benefits and expenditures on healthcare services. RESULTS: Past-year cannabis use was reported by 31% of participants, with approximately one third of cannabis use attributed to the treatment of conditions arising from the work-related injury. Condition-related cannabis use was elevated among the 34% of participants reporting severe pain symptoms. In regression models adjusted for age, sex, nature of injury, opioid prescription, and pre-injury chronic conditions, participants reporting condition-related cannabis use had equivalent wage replacement benefit expenditures (ß = 0.254, ns) and higher healthcare benefit expenditures (ß = 0.433, p = 0.012) compared to participants who did not use cannabis. Participants reporting cannabis use unrelated to conditions arising from their work-related injury had lower wage replacement benefit expenditures (ß = - 0.309, p = 0.002) and equivalent healthcare benefit expenditures (ß = - 0.251, ns) compared to participants not using cannabis. CONCLUSION: This novel study of workers' compensation claimants interviewed at 18 months post-injury did not observe a substantial relationship between cannabis use and disability benefit expenditures, suggesting that neither harm nor significant benefit is associated with cannabis use. These findings contribute to understanding the potential benefits and risks associated with cannabis use in settings that have legalized cannabis use.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Cette étude regroupe deux cohortes de travailleurs et travailleuses de l'Ontario interviewés 18 mois après un accident de travail invalidant; elle vise à estimer l'association entre la gravité de la douleur, la consommation de cannabis et les dépenses en prestations d'invalidité. MéTHODE: Les dépenses en prestations d'invalidité de 1 650 travailleurs et travailleuses, obtenues en consultant les dossiers administratifs, ont été combinées aux indicateurs autodéclarés de symptômes de douleur et de consommation de cannabis. Les dépenses en prestations d'invalidité englobaient les prestations de remplacement du salaire et les dépenses en services de soins de santé. RéSULTATS: Une consommation de cannabis au cours de la dernière année a été déclarée par 31 % des participants; environ le tiers de cette consommation de cannabis était imputée au traitement d'affections causées par l'accident de travail. La consommation de cannabis liée à une affection était élevée chez les 34 % de participants ayant déclaré de graves symptômes de douleur. Selon nos modèles de régression ajustés selon l'âge, le sexe, la nature de la blessure, la prescription d'opioïdes et l'existence d'états chroniques avant l'accident, pour les participants ayant déclaré une consommation de cannabis liée à une affection, les dépenses en prestations de remplacement du salaire étaient équivalentes (ß = 0,254, ns) et les dépenses en prestations de soins de santé étaient supérieures (ß = 0,433, p = 0,012) à celles des participants n'ayant pas consommé de cannabis. Pour les participants ayant déclaré une consommation de cannabis sans rapport avec des affections causées par leur accident de travail, les dépenses en prestations de remplacement du salaire étaient inférieures (ß = -0,309, p = 0,002) et les dépenses en prestations de soins de santé étaient équivalentes (ß = -0,251, ns) à celles des participants n'ayant pas consommé de cannabis. CONCLUSION: Cette étude novatrice menée auprès de demandeurs d'indemnités interviewés 18 mois après leur accident n'a pas observé de relation importante entre la consommation de cannabis et les dépenses en prestations d'invalidité, ce qui semble indiquer que ni des préjudices, ni des avantages significatifs ne sont associés à la consommation de cannabis. Ces constats contribuent à la compréhension des avantages et des risques qui pourraient être associés à la consommation de cannabis dans les milieux où cette consommation est légale.

Pain Severity in Relation to Smoking Cessation Problems and Self-Efficacy for Quitting among Latinx Individuals Who Smoke Cigarettes: The Moderating Role of Perceived Discrimination.

Background: Latinx individuals experience significant tobacco cigarette smoking-related diseases and illnesses. Although most Latinx smokers report a desire to quit smoking, evidenced-based cessation treatments are underutilized in this group, which may partially be due to lower likelihood of receiving advice from a healthcare professional. Further, there are a lack of cessation treatments that account for comorbid symptoms/conditions (e.g., co-occurring pain) and social determinants of health (e.g., perceived discrimination). Extant work has established the reciprocal relation between pain and smoking trajectories. Additionally, although social determinants, such as perceived racial/ethnic discrimination, have demonstrated clinical relevance to a variety of health-related behaviors, limited work has examined the role of perceived discrimination in pain-smoking relations. The current study examined the effects of perceived discrimination and pain severity in relation to smoking cessation problems and self-efficacy for quitting among Latinx cigarette smokers. Method: Participants included 226 (Mage = 34.95 years, SD = 8.62; 38.5% female) adult Latinx daily cigarette smokers. Results: Results indicated that the interaction of pain and perceived discrimination was predictive of greater quit problems (p = 0.041) as well as greater confidence in the ability to refrain from smoking in response to internal (p < 0.001) and external stimuli (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Overall, this work provides a more nuanced understanding of the psychosocial contexts in which Latinx smokers may encounter problems related to quitting, and this data is important for future smoking cessation research and treatment.

Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Pain and Pain-Related Outcomes in Adults and Children With Sickle Cell Disease: A Multivariable Analysis of the GRNDaD Multicenter Registry.

Pain is the primary symptomatic manifestation of sickle cell disease (SCD), an inherited hemoglobinopathy. The characteristics that influence pain experiences and outcomes in SCD are not fully understood. The primary objective of this study was to use multivariable modeling to examine associations of biopsychosocial variables with a disease-specific measure of pain interference known as pain impact. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Global Research Network for Data and Discovery national SCD registry. A total of 657 children and adults with SCD were included in the analysis. This sample was 60% female with a median age of 34 (interquartile range 26-42 years) and a chronic pain prevalence of 64%. The model accounted for 58% of the variance in pain impact. Low social (P < .001) and emotional (P < .001) functioning, increasing age (P = .004), low income (P < .001), and high acute painful episodes (P = .007) were most strongly associated with high pain impact in our multivariable model. Additionally, multivariable modeling of pain severity and physical function in 2 comparable samples of registry participants revealed that increasing age and low social functioning were also strongly associated with higher pain severity and low physical functioning. Overall, the results suggest that social and emotional functioning are more strongly associated with pain impact in individuals with SCD than previously studied biological modifiers such as SCD genotype, hemoglobin, and percentage fetal hemoglobin. Future research using longitudinally collected data is needed to confirm these findings. PERSPECTIVE: This study reveals that psychosocial (ie, social and emotional functioning) and demographic (ie, age) variables may play an important role in predicting pain and pain-related outcomes in SCD. Our findings can inform future multicenter prospective longitudinal studies aimed at identifying modifiable psychosocial predictors of adverse pain outcomes in SCD.

The 8-Year Course of Acute Physical Pain Reported by Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder and Comparison Subjects With Other Personality Disorders.

The present study examines the 8-year course of physical pain and its interference with functioning in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and a comparison group of patients with other personality disorders (other-PD). Participants completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at five assessments, each separated by 2 years. Results showed that across all 13 domains assessed, participants with BPD reported significantly higher levels of acute physical pain and its functional interference than other-PD comparison subjects. The severity of physical pain and its interference with multiple domains of functioning were relatively stable over 8 years of assessment for both study groups. Within the BPD group, pain was significantly associated with older age, comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD), and history of a physically violent partner. Taken together, these results suggest that physical pain is a serious health issue for individuals with BPD that interferes with functioning across a wide spectrum of areas.

Accuracy of Pain Scales in Predicting Critical Diagnoses in Non-Traumatic Abdominal Pain Cases; a Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Accurate assessment and management of abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED) is crucial, as it can indicate potentially life-threatening conditions requiring timely treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of pain scales to predict critical diagnoses in patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital and involved individuals aged 15 years and above who presented to the ED with non-traumatic abdominal pain. Pain severity was evaluated using subjective pain scales, including the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Face Pain Scale (FPS), as well as objective pain scales, including the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and the Non-verbal Pain Score (NVPS). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) was employed to determine the discriminative ability of each pain scale to predict critical diagnosis. Results: 264 cases with the mean age of 47.2±19.4 years were studied (53.0% male). The most common location of abdominal pain was epigastric pain (43.9%). Most patients presented with dull-aching pain, and those with critical diagnoses had more of this characteristic than those with non-critical diagnoses. (52.5% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.01). The overall median NRS, FPS, CPOT, and NVPS of included participants were 8 (interquartile range (IQR) 7-10), 8 (IQR 6-8), 3 (IQR 1-4), and 3 (IQR 2-4), respectively. Patients with critical diagnoses had a higher NVPS score than patients with non-critical diagnoses (median score of 4 vs. 3, p = 0.02). The AuROC of NRS, FPS, CPOT, and NVPS were 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45-0.62), 0.55 (95% CI: 0.46-0.63), 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50-0.68), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53-0.71), respectively. The correlation coefficients among these scales were considered moderately correlated or higher. Conclusion: In evaluating patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain, the NVPS demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting critical diagnoses. However, all pain scales, whether subjective or objective, exhibited suboptimal performance in predicting critical diagnoses.