GH receptor polymorphisms guide second-line therapies to prevent acromegaly skeletal fragility: preliminary results of a pilot study.

Background: Skeletal fragility is characterized by increased frequency of vertebral fractures (VFs) in acromegaly. Several trials were conducted to identify modifiable risk factors and predictors of VFs, with limited data on the prognostic role of GH receptor (GHR) isoforms. In this study, we investigated the potential role of GHR polymorphism on the occurrence of incidental VFs (i-VFs), in patients treated with second-line medical therapies. Methods: A longitudinal, retrospective, observational study was conducted on a cohort of 45 acromegalic patients not-responsive to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) and treated with GHR antagonist (Pegvisomant) or with the second-generation SRLs (Pasireotide long-acting release). Results: Second line treatments were Pegvisomant plus fg-SRLs in 26 patients and Pasireotide LAR in 19 patients. From the group treated with fg-SRLs+Peg-V, the fl-GHR isoform was identified in 18 patients (69.2%) and the d3-GHR isoform in 8 patients (30.8%). I-VFs arose exclusively in fl-GHR isoform carriers (p=0.039). From the group treated with Pasireotide LAR, the fl-GHR isoform was identified in 11 patients (57.9%), and the d3-GHR isoform in 8 patients (42.1%). I-VFs arose exclusively in d3-GHR isoform carriers (p=0.018). Patients with fl-GHR isoform had a higher risk for i-VFs if treated with fg-SRL+Peg-V (OR: 1.6 95%IC: 1.1-2.3, p=0.04), and a lower risk if treated with Pasi-LAR (OR: 0.26 IC95%: 0.11-0.66, p=0.038). Conclusions: Our data support a predictive role of the GHR isoforms for the occurrence of i-VFs in acromegalic patients treated with second-line drugs, tailored to the individual patient. The knowledge of the GHR polymorphism may facilitate the choice of second-line therapies, improving the therapeutic approach, in the context of personalized medicine.

Medical treatment of acromegaly - When the tumor size matters: A narrative review.

Medical treatment of acromegaly is generally positioned as a second line of treatment after pituitary adenoma surgery. With the rising availability and variety of medications for acromegaly increases our understanding of their effectiveness and safety. Volume of the published data on the impact of medical therapy on biochemical control of acromegaly, contrasts a relative lack of publications which comprehensively address pituitary tumor alterations under different drug modalities. Assessment of changes in GH-secreting adenoma volume is often overshadowed by clinicians' focus on GH and IGF-I levels during acromegaly treatment. Close analysis of studies published in the last two decades, reveals that both an increase and decrease in somatotropinoma volume are possible during treatment with any of available drugs for acromegaly. Changes in pituitary tumor size may arise from the biological nature of adenoma itself, independently of the administered medications. Therefore, an individual approach is necessary in the treatment of patients with acromegaly, based on repeated insight to their clinical, biochemical, pathological and imaging characteristics. In this review, we summarize and comment how pituitary tumor size is affected by the treatment with all currently available drugs in acromegaly: long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands of the first generation (octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel) and the second generation (pasireotide-LAR), as well as pegvisomant (PEG) and cabergoline (CAB).

Rapid Resolution of Recalcitrant Headache With Pasireotide in an Adult Patient With Acromegaly.

Acromegaly is a chronic hormonal disorder caused by excessive GH secretion. In addition to physiological symptoms, it is often accompanied by debilitating headaches. Although effective treatment options exist, achieving complete symptom control and disease management can still be challenging. This case report chronicles the clinical journey of a 38-year-old male diagnosed with acromegaly in 2013. Despite prior interventions, including surgery and treatment with first-generation somatostatin analogues, severe frequent headaches persisted. Following a switch to pasireotide, the patient reported rapid and complete resolution of headaches and normalization of IGF-1 levels within a month of the treatment switch. This report underscores the challenges in acromegaly management and confirms the potential utility of pasireotide for patients suffering from treatment-resistant headache.

Clinical Evaluation of Response to Octreotide and Chemotherapy in High-Grade Malignant Neuroendocrine Tumors and Promising In Vitro Preclinical Results with Pasireotide.

Background and Objectives: High-grade malignant neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are characterized by rapid proliferation, high metastatic capacity, and strong expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). We aimed to analyze the presence of SSTRs in NET G3 and NEC, and to correlate their expression with the use of octreotide and pasireotide. Materials and Methods: For this purpose, we first performed a retrospective study of G3 NET and NEC patients, which included the determination of SSTR expression and response to octreotide treatment. Second, we selected the H69 small cell lung cancer cell line to determine the effect of octreotide and pasireotide. Results: Our results showed the traditional somatostatin analog (SSA) octreotide was ineffective in patients with NET G3 and NEC. On the other hand, RT-qPCR showed a high expression of SSTR2 and SSTR5 in H69 cells. Interestingly, while octreotide did not modify H69 cell proliferation, a strong inhibition of proliferation was detected with the use of pasireotide. Conclusions: In view of these results, a clinical trial in NET G3 and NEC patients using pasireotide is necessary to determine the usefulness of this drug in improving patient treatment.

Case report: Exceptional transmission of congenital hyperinsulinism from a focal CHI mother to her diffuse CHI dichorionic diamniotic twins.

We present the case of a 36-year-old female who was diagnosed at birth with CHI that caused severe hypoglycaemia unresponsive to Diazoxide. Subtotal pancreatectomy was performed at the age of three weeks. Later, histological analysis of her pancreas in a research setting revealed a focal form of CHI. Genetic testing was not available at that time. The patient developed pancreatic exocrine deficiency and insulin-dependent diabetes at the age of 9 years. In 2016, a genetic test revealed a missense heterozygous variant in the ABCC8 gene inherited from her father and classified as having a recessive inheritance. The geneticist concluded that the risk of CHI for her offspring would be low (1/600), making pregnancy favourable. As there was no consanguinity in the family, testing the future father was deemed unnecessary (carrier frequency 1/150 in the general population). The pregnancy occurred spontaneously in 2020 and at a gestational age of 28 weeks, the mother went into premature labour. An emergency C-section was performed in April 2021 resulting in the birth of bichorial bi-amniotic male twins. Following birth, both newborns experienced persistent severe hypoglycaemia which required glucagon treatment and intravenous glucose infusion initially, followed by Diazoxide from day 51 after birth, without satisfactory response. Continuous intravenous Octreotide treatment was introduced on day 72. Due to the recurrence of hypoglycaemia episodes despite reaching maximum doses of Octreotide, from day 92 the treatment was switched to Pasireotide. Genetic tests revealed the same genotypes for both infants: the exon 39 missense variant (c.4716C>A; p.Ser1572Arg) inherited from their mother and a truncating variant in exon 28 (c.3550del; p.Val1184*), inherited from their asymptomatic father. As a result of inheriting two recessive variants of the ABCC8 gene, the children were diagnosed with a diffuse form of CHI, consistent with the diazoxide-unresponsive presentation. This situation is very rare outside consanguinity. This case emphasises the significance of genetic counselling for individuals with a history of rare diseases outside the context of consanguinity, as there is a potential risk of recurrence. Prenatal diagnosis can lead to better outcomes for affected neonates, as well as help families make informed decisions about future pregnancies.

Management of Diabetes Mellitus in Acromegaly and Cushing's Disease with Focus on Pasireotide Therapy: A Narrative Review.

Patients suffering from acromegaly and Cushing's Disease (CD) face the risk of several clinical complications. The onset of diabetes mellitus (DM) is among the most important: exposure to elevated growth hormone or cortisol levels is associated with insulin resistance (IR). DM contributes to increasing cardiovascular risk for these subjects, which is higher compared to healthy individuals. Hyperglycemia may also be caused by pasireotide, a second-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRLs), currently used for the treatment of these diseases. Accordingly, with 2014 medical expert recommendations, the management of hyperglycemia in patients with CD and treated with pasireotide is based on lifestyle changes, metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and, subsequently, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs). There is no position for SGLT2-inhibitors (SGLT2-i). However, a very recent experts' consensus regarding the management of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly suggests the use of GLP-1 RAs as first line treatment (in suitable patients) and the use of SGLT2-i as second line treatment in patients with high cardiovascular risk or renal disease. As a matter of fact, beyond the hypoglycemic effect of GLP1-RAs and SGLT2-i, there is increasing evidence regarding their role in the reduction of cardiovascular risk, commonly very high in acromegaly and CD and often tough to improve despite biochemical remission. So, an increasing use of GLP1-RAs and SGLT2-i to control hyperglycemia is desirable in these diseases. Obviously, all of that must be done with due attention in order to minimize the occurrence of adverse events. For this reason, large studies are needed to analyze the presence of potential limitations.

Long-term Remission in Functioning Pituitary Adenomas after Medical Therapy Withdrawal: A Chance for Cushing's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The possibility of sustained disease remission in functioning pituitary adenomas after drug withdrawal is well-known for prolactinomas and it has also been described in a subset of acromegalic patients. Similarly, medical treatment for Cushing's Disease (CD) is generally considered a life-long measure except for previously radio-treated patients. Sparse evidence of spontaneous remissions in CD has been reported, mainly related to a possible pituitary tumor apoplexy. To the best of our knowledge, none of these cases has included the use of a pituitary targeting agent. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we have reported the case of a radiotherapy-naïve patient with persistent CD after pituitary surgery who participated in the CSOMG230 trials, presenting sustained remission after Long-acting Release (LAR) pasireotide withdrawal. We have also briefly reviewed previous cases of sustained remission after somatostatin analogues withdrawal in other functioning pituitary adenomas. Under monthly pasireotide LAR 40 mg, the patient achieved urinary hormone control and clinical signs of cortisol excess normalization. After 8 years of treatment, the patient completed the study protocol and had to withdraw the drug as it was no longer available for CD in Italy. Before starting new therapies, we reassessed hormone levels that were surprisingly within normal ranges. At 24 months after the last dose of pasireotide, the patient was still in clinical and biochemical full remission. CONCLUSION: Far from the general rule, this case suggests that prolonged treatment with pasireotide LAR might induce a durable CD remission. A dose down-titration/suspension might be considered in patients well-controlled on long-term therapy and with negative pituitary imaging. However, close monitoring is recommended given the high rate of complications in untreated patients.

Structural insights into somatostatin receptor 5 bound with cyclic peptides.

Somatostatin receptor 5 (SSTR5) is highly expressed in ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas and is an important drug target for the treatment of Cushing's disease. Two cyclic SST analog peptides (pasireotide and octreotide) both can activate SSTR5 and SSTR2. Pasireotide is preferential binding to SSTR5 than octreotide, while octreotide is biased to SSTR2 than SSTR5. The lack of selectivity of both pasireotide and octreotide causes side effects, such as hyperglycemia, gastrointestinal disturbance, and abnormal glucose homeostasis. However, little is known about the binding and selectivity mechanisms of pasireotide and octreotide with SSTR5, limiting the development of subtype-selective SST analog drugs specifically targeting SSTR5. Here, we report two cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of SSTR5-Gi complexes activated by pasireotide and octreoitde at resolutions of 3.09 Å and 3.24 Å, respectively. In combination with structural analysis and functional experiments, our results reveal the molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition and receptor activation. We also demonstrate that pasireotide preferentially binds to SSTR5 through the interactions between Tyr(Bzl)/DTrp of pasireotide and SSTR5. Moreover, we find that the Q2.63, N6.55, F7.35 and ECL2 of SSTR2 play a crucial role in octreotide biased binding of SSTR2. Our results will provide structural insights and offer new opportunities for the drug discovery of better selective pharmaceuticals targeting specific SSTR subtypes.

Standards of care for medical management of acromegaly in pituitary tumor centers of excellence (PTCOE).

PURPOSE: A series of consensus guidelines on medical treatment of acromegaly have been produced in the last two decades. However, little information is available on their application in clinical practice. Furthermore, international standards of acromegaly care have not been published. The aim of our study was to report current standards of care for medical therapy of acromegaly, using results collected through an audit performed to validate criteria for definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE). METHODS: Details of medical treatment approaches to acromegaly were voluntarily provided by nine renowned international centers that participated in this audit. For the period 2018-2020, we assessed overall number of acromegaly patients under medical treatment, distribution of patients on different treatment modalities, overall biochemical control rate with medical therapy, and specific control rates for different medical treatment options. RESULTS: Median number of total patients and median number of new patients with acromegaly managed annually in the endocrinology units of the centers were 206 and 16.3, respectively. Median percentage of acromegaly patients on medical treatment was 48.9%. Among the patients on medical treatment, first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) monotherapy was used with a median rate of 48.7%, followed by combination therapies with a median rate of 29.3%. Cabergoline monotherapy was used in 6.9% of patients. Pegvisomant monotherapy was used in 7 centers and pasireotide monotherapy in 5 centers, with median rates of 7.9% and 6.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current standards of care in PTCOEs include use of first-generation SRLs as the first medical option in about 50% of patients, as recommended by consensus guidelines. However, some patients are kept on this treatment despite inadequate control suggesting that cost-effectiveness, availability, patient preference, side effects, and therapeutic inertia may play a possible role also in PTCOE. Moreover, at odds with consensus guidelines, other monotherapies for acromegaly appear to have a marginal role as compared to combination therapies as extrapolated from PTCOE practice data. Presence of uncontrolled patients in each treatment category suggest that further optimization of medical therapy, as well as use of other therapeutic tools such as radiosurgery may be needed.

Insights from an Italian Delphi panel: exploring resistance to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands and guiding second-line medical therapies in acromegaly management.

PURPOSE: First-line medical therapy for acromegaly management includes first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs), but resistance limits their use. Despite international guidelines, the choice of second-line therapy is debated. METHODS: We aim to discuss resistance to fgSRLs, identify second-line therapy determinants and assess glycemia's impact to provide valuable insights for acromegaly management in clinical practice. A group of Italian endocrinologists expert in the pituitary field participated in a two-round Delphi panel between July and September 2023. The Delphi questionnaire encompassed a total of 75 statements categorized into three sections: resistance to fgSRLs therapy and predictors of response; determinants for the selection of second-line therapy; the role of glycemia in the therapeutic management. The statements were rated on a 6-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Fifty-nine (79%) statements reached a consensus. IGF-1 levels resulted central for evaluating resistance to fgSRLs, that should be defined considering also symptomatic clinical response, degree of tumor shrinkage and complications, using clinician- and patient-reported outcome tools available. Factors to be evaluated for the choice of second-line medical therapy are hyperglycemia-that should be managed as in non-acromegalic patients-tumor remnant, resistant headache and compliance. Costs do not represent a main determinant in the choice of second-line medical treatment. CONCLUSION: The experts agreed on a holistic management approach to acromegaly. It is therefore necessary to choose currently available highly effective second-line medical treatment (pegvisomant and pasireotide) based on the characteristics of the patients.

Bone health and skeletal fragility in second- and third-line medical therapies for acromegaly: preliminary results from a pilot single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Skeletal fragility is a clinically relevant and not-reversible complication of acromegaly, involving around 30-40% of patients since the disease diagnosis. Few studies have investigated the effects on skeletal health of medical therapies for acromegaly. In this retrospective longitudinal monocentre study, we investigated the outcome of skeletal fragility in patients treated with Pasireotide Lar in combination with Pegvisomant (Pasi-Lar + Peg-V), also comparing those observed in patients treated with conventional therapies. RESULTS: We included 6 patients treated with Pasi-Lar + Peg-V, 5 patients treated with Peg-V in monotherapy (m-Peg-V), 16 patients treated with Peg-V plus first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs + Peg-V), 9 patients treated with Pasi-Lar. None of the patients treated with Pasi-Lar + Peg-V experienced worsening of spine and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) and incident vertebral fractures (i-VFs). Eight patients experienced i-VFs. The frequency of i-VFs was significantly lower in patients treated with the Pasi-Lar + Peg-V (0/8; 0%), as compared to those observed in m-Peg-V treated patients (4/8; 50%, p = 0.02). The frequency of i-VFs was slightly but not significantly higher in Pasi-Lar treated patients (1/8; 12.5% p = 0.6) and in fg-SRLs + Peg-V treated patients (3/8; 37.5% p = 0.364), concerning those treated with Pasi-Lar + Peg-V (0/8; 0%). I-VFs occurred more frequently in patients with higher GH levels at acromegaly diagnosis (p < 0.001), and in patients who experienced a BMD worsening (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggested that in conventional and multi-drug resistant acromegaly, the combination therapy Pasi-Lar + Peg-V may prevent the worsening of BMD and the occurrence of i-VFs. Prospective and translational studies should further validate these results and ascertain underlying physiopathology mechanisms.

Long-term pasireotide-LAR treatment in the personalized therapy of patients with complex acromegaly: a collection of clinical experiences.

Pasireotide-LAR is recommended as a second-line treatment for patients with acromegaly. Although the effects of pasireotide-LAR have been well characterized in clinical studies, real-practice evidence is scant, especially in the long term and within the individualization of therapy in patients with comorbidities. To provide additional insight on the individualized approach to acromegaly management, six clinical cases of complex acromegaly treated with pasireotide-LAR for more than 5 years were reported. Pasireotide-LAR allowed the normalization of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) values in all patients and reduced tumour residue volume where present. A good safety profile and long-term tolerability were also reported.

Pegvisomant and pasireotide in PRL and GH co-secreting vs GH-secreting Pit-NETs.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of second-line therapies in patients with acromegaly caused by a growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) co-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (GH&PRL-Pit-NET) compared to their efficacy in patients with acromegaly caused by a GH-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (GH-Pit-NET). This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with acromegaly on treatment with pasireotide and/or pegvisomant. Patients were classified in two groups: GH&PRL-Pit-NETs when evidence of hyperprolactinemia and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for GH and PRL was positive or if PRL were >200 ng/dL regardless of the PRL-IHC and GH-Pit-NETs when the previously mentioned criteria were not met. A total of 28 cases with GH&PRL-Pit-NETs and 122 with GH-Pit-NETs met the inclusion criteria. GH&PRL-Pit-NETs presented at a younger age, caused hypopituitarism, and were invasive more frequently than GH-Pit-NETs. There were 124 patients treated with pegvisomant and 49 with pasireotide at any time. The efficacy of pegvisomant for IGF-1 normalization was of 81.5% and of pasireotide of 71.4%. No differences in IGF-1 control with pasireotide and with pegvisomant were observed between GH&PRL-Pit-NETs and GH-Pit-NETs. All GH&PRL-Pit-NET cases treated with pasireotide (n = 6) and 82.6% (n = 19/23) of the cases treated with pegvisomant normalized PRL levels. No differences in the rate of IGF-1 control between pegvisomant and pasireotide were detected in patients with GH&PRL-Pit-NETs (84.9% vs 66.7%, P = 0.178). We conclude that despite the more aggressive behavior of GH&PRL-Pit-NETs than GH-Pit-NETs, no differences in the rate of IGF-1 control with pegvisomant and pasireotide were observed between both groups, and both drugs have shown to be effective treatments to control IGF-1 and PRL hypersecretion in these tumors.

Acute Interstitial Nephritis and Oxalate Nephropathy After Rapid Pasireotide Response in Treatment-resistant Acromegaly.

We report a case of interstitial nephritis, likely secondary to oxalate nephropathy, due to the development of pancreatic exocrine dysfunction after commencement of pasireotide for acromegaly. Pasireotide is known to impair insulin secretion but can also impair pancreatic exocrine function, hypothezised to result from high-affinity binding of somatostatin receptors 1, 2, 3, and 5. This has been an advantage in postoperative tissue anastomoses after pancreatic surgery, but exocrine insufficiency has not been reported when used for the treatment of acromegaly. A 73-year-old woman, diagnosed with acromegaly, was unable to achieve biochemical control despite 2 surgical resections of an invasive mammosomatotroph pituitary tumor and treatment with cabergoline and maximal-dose lanreotide. The tumor expressed somatostatin receptor type 5 but not somatostatin receptor type 2, predicting good response from pasireotide, which was commenced at 40 mg every 4 weeks. IGF-1 rapidly normalized, but the patient presented with nausea, anorexia, and acute kidney injury. Renal biopsy revealed acute-on-chronic interstitial nephritis, with numerous oxalate crystals. Increased fecal fat globules were noted on fat stain (3+), supporting malabsorption as an etiology of secondary enteric hyperoxaluria. Renal function recovered to near baseline over months following pasireotide withdrawal and high-dose glucocorticoids.

Predictive factors and the management of hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly and Cushing's disease receiving pasireotide treatment: post hoc analyses from the SOM230B2219 study.

Introduction: Pasireotide, a somatostatin receptor ligand, is approved for treating acromegaly and Cushing's disease (CD). Hyperglycemia during treatment can occur because of the drug's mechanism of action, although treatment discontinuation is rarely required. The prospective, randomized, Phase IV SOM230B2219 (NCT02060383) trial was designed to assess optimal management of pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia. Here, we investigated predictive factors for requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pasireotide treatment. Methods: Participants with acromegaly or CD initiated long-acting pasireotide 40 mg/28 days intramuscularly (acromegaly) or pasireotide 600 µg subcutaneously twice daily during pre-randomization (≤16 weeks). Those who did not need antihyperglycemic medication, were managed with metformin, or received insulin from baseline entered an observational arm ending at 16 weeks. Those who required additional/alternative antihyperglycemic medication to metformin were randomized to incretin-based therapy or insulin for an additional 16 weeks. Logistic-regression analyses evaluated quantitative and qualitative factors for requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pre-randomization. Results: Of 190 participants with acromegaly and 59 with CD, 88 and 15, respectively, did not need antihyperglycemic medication; most were aged <40 years (acromegaly 62.5%, CD 86.7%), with baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <6.5% (<48 mmol/mol; acromegaly 98.9%, CD 100%) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <100 mg/dL (<5.6 mmol/L; acromegaly 76.1%, CD 100%). By logistic regression, increasing baseline HbA1c (odds ratio [OR] 3.6; P=0.0162) and FPG (OR 1.0; P=0.0472) and history of diabetes/pre-diabetes (OR 3.0; P=0.0221) predicted receipt of antihyperglycemic medication in acromegaly participants; increasing baseline HbA1c (OR 12.6; P=0.0276) was also predictive in CD participants. Investigator-reported hyperglycemia-related adverse events were recorded in 47.9% and 54.2% of acromegaly and CD participants, respectively, mainly those with diabetes/pre-diabetes. Conclusion: Increasing age, HbA1c, and FPG and pre-diabetes/diabetes were associated with increased likelihood of requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pasireotide treatment. These risk factors may be used to identify those who need more vigilant monitoring to optimize outcomes during pasireotide treatment.

Successful medical management of a pituitary macroadenoma with features of resistant acromegaly and hyperprolactinemia using pasireotide.

BACKGROUND: The somatostatin analog, pasireotide, is used for the treatment of acromegaly after the failure of surgery and/or first-line medical treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old male reported that during a workup for obesity in his home country, hyperprolactinemia was diagnosed and a 3.5 × 3.5 cm pituitary macroadenoma was identified on pituitary MRI. He received cabergoline for 6 months; then he was lost to follow-up. He presented at our Endocrine clinic 2 years later for treatment of obesity (BMI 49.5 kg/m2). Biochemical workup revealed that in addition to hyperprolactinemia (7,237 [normal: 85-323 mIU/L), he had acromegaly, evident by elevated insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level (450 [normal: 88-210 µg/L]), and a positive growth hormone suppression test, secondary hypothyroidism, and secondary hypogonadism. Pituitary MRI showed that the adenoma encased parts of the left and right internal carotid arteries and encroached on the optic chiasm. Surgical excision was therefore not feasible. He was treated with cabergoline and later, long-acting release (LAR) octreotide. Prolactin levels were reduced with cabergoline, but IGF-1 levels did not respond to octreotide, and it was discontinued. The patient abandoned radiotherapy after two sessions. He was started on LAR pasireotide 40 mg every 4 weeks and continued on cabergoline 0.5 mg per week. His biochemical response was dramatic, with a near normalization of IGF-1 levels in 3 months. After 6 months from starting pasireotide, we increased cabergoline dose from 0.5 mg/week to 3 mg/week. Three months later, IGF-1 level was normalized. The patient developed type 2 diabetes as a side effect of pasireotide; however, this was well-controlled with medications. CONCLUSIONS: The case suggests that pasireotide can provide marked biochemical improvement in acromegaly after the failure of both cabergoline monotherapy and cabergoline plus octreotide. This further confirms a potentially efficacious treatment regimen in treatment-resistant acromegaly with hyperprolactinemia.

Changes in multi-modality management of acromegaly in a tertiary centre over 2 decades.

PURPOSE: Acromegaly is a rare disease associated with chronic multisystem complications. New therapeutic strategies have emerged in the last decades, combining pituitary transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), radiotherapy or radiosurgery (RXT) and medical treatments. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study focused on presentation, management and outcome of acromegaly patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020, still followed up in 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, and comparison of the first vs. second decade of the study. RESULTS: 275 patients were included, 50 diagnosed before 2010 and 225 after 2010. 95% of them had normal IGF-1 levels (with or without treatment) at the last follow-up. Transsphenoidal surgery was more successful after 2010 (75% vs. 54%; p < 0.01), while tumor characteristics remained the same over time. The time from first treatment to biochemical control was shorter after 2010 than before (8 vs. 16 months; p = 0.03). Since 2010, RT was used less frequently (10% vs. 32%; p < 0.01) but more rapidly after surgery (26 vs. 53 months; p = 0.03). In patients requiring anti-secretory drugs after TSS, the time from first therapy to biochemical control was shorter after 2010 (16 vs. 29 months; p < 0.01). Tumor size, tumor invasiveness, baseline IGF-1 levels and Trouillas classification were identified as predictors of remission. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of patients with acromegaly now have successful disease control with a multimodal approach. They reached biochemical control sooner in the most recent half of the study period. Future work should focus on those patients who are still uncontrolled and on the sequelae of the disease.

Long-term pasireotide therapy in acromegaly: extensive real-life experience of a referral center.

PURPOSE: Pasireotide is a novel therapeutic option for patients with acromegaly resistant to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands. To date, real-life data are still scant, therefore, the aim of the current study is to evaluate the impact of long-term pasireotide therapy on disease control, pituitary tumor size, gluco-insulinemic and lipid profile in a real-life setting. METHODS: Retrospective study of data prospectively collected, evaluating hormonal, tumoral, and metabolic data of 28 patients with acromegaly administered with pasireotide in a pituitary tertiary referral center. RESULTS: Within the first 12 months of treatment, 70.4% of patients achieved normal IGF-I levels, which was maintained at 36-month evaluation in these responders patients. Patients who started with pasireotide 60 mg monthly exhibited significantly lower IGF-I levels after 36 months (p = 0.05) as compared to patients administered first with pasireotide 20 or 40 mg monthly. The maximal tumoral diameter was significantly decreased after 12 months of pasireotide (p < 0.001) and a further reduction was registered throughout the following months, with 41.2% of patients achieving a significant reduction (> 25% of baseline measurement) after 36 months of treatment. Fasting glucose significantly increased during the first 6 months (p < 0.001) with a gradual rise in diabetes prevalence during the following months, resulting diabetes prevalence after 36 months of pasireotide significantly increased compared to baseline (p = 0.003), although with glycated hemoglobin levels within the normal range. Diabetes was managed using oral glucose-lowering drugs or glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists, with no patient requiring insulin therapy. Pasireotide improved lipid profile, mainly during the first 12 months of treatment, by increasing HDL and decreasing triglycerides levels. CONCLUSION: Pasireotide is effective and safe in the long-term. Hyperglycemia is a common event and is manageable even without insulin treatment.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a pasireotide subcutaneous depot (CAM4071) and comparison with immediate and long-acting release pasireotide.

PURPOSE: To assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of subcutaneous depot CAM4071, a novel, ready-to-use pasireotide formulation. METHODS: This was a phase 1, randomised, open-label study in healthy volunteers. After a single 600 µg dose of pasireotide immediate release (IR), participants were randomised to one of eight groups to receive either a CAM4071 upper thigh (5, 10, 20, 40 or 80 mg) or buttock (20 mg) injection or multiple pasireotide IR 900 µg upper thigh injections twice daily or a single pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) 60 mg intramuscular buttock injection. RESULTS: Ninety-four participants were randomised. For all CAM4071 doses, initial pasireotide release was relatively rapid compared to pasireotide LAR and sustained over the 2-month observation period, with a slow decay in plasma concentrations. CAM4071 maximum plasma concentrations increased slightly greater than dose proportionally; area under the curve extrapolated to infinity increased approximately dose proportionally. Relative bioavailability of pasireotide for different doses of CAM4071 versus pasireotide IR 600 µg ranged from 0.752 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58, 0.98) to 1.68 (1.32, 2.14), and versus pasireotide LAR: 0.517 (0.37, 0.72) to 1.15 (0.84, 1.58). CAM4071 doses >5 mg exhibited rapid initial reductions of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) compared to pasireotide LAR. Maximum IGF-1 inhibition was greatest for CAM4071 80 mg. CAM4071 injections ≤40 mg were well tolerated and comparable with currently available pasireotide formulations. CONCLUSION: CAM4071 provided long-acting release of pasireotide over at least one month, with high bioavailability and onset and duration of IGF-1 suppression similar to pasireotide LAR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2014-003783-20.

Efficacy of pasireotide LAR for acromegaly: a prolonged real-world monocentric study.

Background: Acromegaly is caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1). Medical therapy plays a role as a treatment option for persistent disease after non-curative surgery or as a first-line therapy when surgery is not feasible. Pasireotide-LAR (Pas-LAR) is recommended for patients with acromegaly as second-line treatment. Aim: To evaluate the patients characteristics predictive of an adequate response to Pas-LAR and the long-term efficacy and safety of the Pas-LAR treatment. Methods: Data from 19 patients with active acromegaly, who were and resistant or intolerant to first-line medical therapy and were switched to pas-LAR have been retrospectively collected. We compared the baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients who were found to respond to Pas-LAR therapy (responders, n=14) with those of patients who did not respond (non-responders, n=5). We then evaluated the Pas-LAR efficacy and safety during long-term follow-up in responders. Results: IGF1 normalization occurred in 71.4% of responders after one injection. IGF1 levels, [median(interquartile range) of the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) fold increase] were higher in non-responders compared to responders within the initial month of therapy [1.40(1.30-2.34) vs 0.70(0.55-1.25), respectively, p=0.009] and after three [1.77(1.74-2.29) vs 0.94(0.82-1.13), respectively, p=0.029] and six months [1.68(1.33-1.72) vs 1.00(0.65 -1.28), respectively, p=0.002]. Out of 6 patients with symptomatic headache (all in responder group), 5 and 1 reported the resolution and improvement of headache, respectively, already after the first injection. Median HbA1c levels tended to increase from baseline to 6 months both in responder (36 mMol/Mol to 42 mMol/Mol) and non-responder patients (45 mMol/Mol to 48 mMol/Mol). During long term follow up, in the responder group 2 new patients developed diabetes. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 6 out of 7 evaluated responders, with no cases of size increase during the long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Pas-LAR is effective and safe and the early identification of responders is possible just after the first administration.