Peri-implant fractures after Intramedullary fixation for femoral trochanteric fracture: a multicenter (TRON Group) study.

BACKGROUND: With the rise in elderly populations, the incidence of femoral trochanteric fractures has also increased. Although intramedullary nail therapy is commonly used, the incidence of peri-implant fractures (PIFs) as a complication and its associated factors are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of PIFs and treatment strategies and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study across 11 hospitals from 2016 to 2020 examined 1855 patients with femoral trochanter fracture. After excluding 69 patients treated without intramedullary nailing, 1786 patients were analyzed. Parameters studied included age, sex, body mass index, medical history, and treatment methods. PIFs were categorized using the Chan classification. Treatment outcomes and patient mobility were assessed using the Parker Mobility Score, and postoperative complications and one-year survival data were compiled. RESULTS: The incidence of PIFs was 8 in 1786 cases. Chan classification showed 1 case of N1A, 6 of N2A, and 1 of N2B. Only the type N1 case was a transverse fracture, whereas all cases of type N2 were oblique fractures. Among these cases, five patients had fractures extending to the upper part of the femoral condyle. The patient with N1A and one bedridden patient with N2A fracture underwent conservative treatment, one patient with N2A in which the fracture did not extend to the condyle was treated with nail replacement, and 5 patients (N2A: 4, N2B: 1) with fractures extending to the condyle were treated with additional plate fixation. All patients had survived at one year after treatment for PIF, and no reoperations were required. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PIF was very low (0.45%). Of the 6 PIF cases, excluding the bedridden patients, the treatment of choice for PIF was an additional plate if the fracture line extended to the femoral condyle; otherwise, the nail was replaced. All patients achieved bony fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.

Locking Attachment Plate for the Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic and Periimplant Fractures: Long-Term Follow-Up.

Objectives: The surgical management of periprosthetic fractures (PPF) and periimplant fractures (PIF) can be challenging. The locking attachment plate (LAP) was proposed in recent years for the osteosynthesis of such fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the experience of a third-level hospital with LAP for the treatment of PPF and PIF, and analyse the clinical outcomes. Methods: Data were prospectively collected and analysed from all patients whose PPF/PIF was treated surgically with LAP in a third-level hospital from June 2018 to June 2022. All fractures were postoperative low-energy femur fractures. The minimum follow-up period was six months. Results: Thirty-eight patients (31 women) met the eligibility criteria. The mean age was 86.3 years. The median time until surgery was 4 days. A mean of 3.61 screws were used for each LAP. The mean femur plate length was 14 holes, and the mean working length 7.1 holes. The median hospital stay was nine days. The mean follow-up was 19.56 months. At one month, 12 patients tolerated partial weight-bearing. Five patients walked independently indoors. One patient had died and seven patients were readmitted. At six months, six more patients had died. Fifteen patients tolerated full weight-bearing (FWB). Nine patients walked independently indoors, six outdoors. Twenty-five patients reached fracture consolidation without malalignment. Nine patients were readmitted. At 12 months, another patient had died. Seventeen patients tolerated FWB. Eleven patients walked independently indoors, six outdoors. Twenty-five patients achieved fracture consolidation without malalignment. Five patients were readmitted. Fourteen patients crossed the two-year postoperative threshold. All achieved fracture consolidation. Two patients passed the 4-year postoperative milestone. Conclusion: The clinical results of patients whose PPF or PIF was treated with the LAP are promising. This fixation method is a viable option to be considered when planning surgery for such fractures.

Traumatic periimplant fracture after nail arthrodesis of the knee in a limb reconstruction case.

Many principles of bone reconstruction were successfully applied in this unique case of a 1.92m (6 ft 3 in.) tall 15 year old boy with intercalary leg amputation. This patient suffered from a 26 cm (10.2 in.) bone loss of his left distal femur and severe soft tissue damage with an irreparable extensor mechanism after motor cycle accident. After periimplant fracture below the knee arthrodesis nail, definite treatment consisted of implant exchange to an 870 mm (34.3 in.) long custom made nail, which is to our knowledge the longest implanted arthrodesis nail in literature. Therefore the aim of the study was to present our treatment strategies and pitfalls after traumatic periimplant arthrodesis nail fracture in an unusual case of limb reconstruction.

Use of Huckstep nail in the periimplant femoral shaft fracture.

87-year-old female underwent open reduction of distal femoral fracture and internal fixation with locking compression plate and bone graft. She was operated for ipsilateral proximal femoral fractures and stabilized by intramedullary interlocked nail 5 years ago. She developed stress fracture proximal to locked plate. We inserted Huckstep nail after removal of the previous operated proximal femoral nail without removing the remaining plate and screws. At 15 month followup the fractures have united. The Huckstep nail has multiple holes available for screw fixation at any level in such difficult situations.