Fellow eye data for intraocular lens calculation in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the intraocular lens (IOL) calculation of the fellow eye (FE) can be used in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective, consecutive case series, we enrolled patients who underwent combined phacovitrectomy with silicone oil removal and IOL implantation at the Goethe-University. Preoperative examinations included biometry (IOLMaster 700; Carl Zeiss). We used the IOL calculation of the FE (FE group) to calculate the prediction error compared with the IOL calculation using only the axial length (AL) of the FE (AL-FE group), as well as using the AL of the operated eye (OE group) in addition to the measurable biometric parameters. IOL calculation was performed using the Barrett Universal II formula. We compared the mean (MAE) and median absolute prediction error (MedAE) with each other. Furthermore, the number of eyes with ±0.50, ±1.00 and ±2.00 dioptres (D) deviation from the target refraction was compared. RESULTS: In total, 79 eyes of 79 patients were included. MedAE was lowest in the OE group (0.41 D), followed by FE group (1.00 D) and AL-FE group (1.02 D). Comparison between the AL-FE and FE groups showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.712). Comparing eyes within ±0.50 D of the target refraction, the OE group (63.3%) performed best, followed by the AL-FE group (27.8%) and the FE group (26.6%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate no clinically relevant difference between using the IOL calculation of the FE versus using only the AL of the FE in addition to the measurable parameters for the IOL calculation. A two-step procedure should always be strived for.

Clinical Outcomes of a New Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Patients Undergoing Phacovitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and quality of life of newly generated monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients diagnosed with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) following phacovitrectomy. METHODS: In this prospective study, 42 patients with IEM and cataract underwent pars plana vitrectomy. They were divided into the ICB00 group (21 patients) and the ZCB00 group (21 patients). Data collected before and after the surgery were compared between the two groups, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), intraocular pressure, contrast sensitivity (CS), and central macular thickness (CMT). RESULTS: The preoperative characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences. However, at the 6-month follow-up after surgery, there were significant improvements in UDVA (p < 0.001), UIVA (p < 0.001), VRQOL (p < 0.001), CS (p < 0.001), and CMT (p < 0.001) compared to baseline. Notably, the Eyhance ICB00 group showed a significantly higher UCIVA value at 6 months post-surgery when compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 group (p = 0.001), while other parameters did not show significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: The Eyhance IOL significantly improved both intermediate and distance visual acuity, with no notable difference in quality of life or CS compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL after IEM removal. It appears to be a favorable choice for combined cataract and vitreoretinal surgery, offering enhanced vision for daily tasks and a promising alternative to traditional monofocal IOLs.

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Phacovitrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the refractive error in patients undergoing combined phacovitrectomy with and without gas tamponade. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review including patients undergoing phacoemulsification alone (Group 1), combined phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (Group 2), and combined phacovitrectomy with gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) (Group 3). Axial length and keratometry were measured using an optical biometric system (Argos, Alcon Laboratories. Inc.), and a three-piece intraocular lens (IOL; NX-70S) was implanted in all groups. In each group, the prediction error at 3 months was calculated using IOL power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hill-RBF, Kane, and Barrett Universal II) for each eye. Outcome measures included the mean prediction error (MPE), its standard deviation (SD), and the mean absolute error (MAE). The change in IOL position at 3 months was also assessed using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: A total of 104 eyes were included (Group 1: 30; Group 2: 34; Group 3: 40 eyes). The MPE was -0.08 ± 0.37 diopters (D), -0.26 ± 0.32 D, and -0.59 ± 0.34 D in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively, using the Barrett Universal II formula (P < 0.01, ANOVA). The movement forward in the IOL position was 0.95 ± 0.16 mm, 0.94 ± 0.12 mm, and 1.07 ± 0.20 mm in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively (P < 0.01). No significant difference was shown in MPE among the four formulas after combined phacovitrectomy with gas (P = 0.531). CONCLUSIONS: Phacovitrectomy in RRD induced a significant myopic shift using any of the clinically available formulas. This suggests that myopic shift should be taken into consideration for better refractive outcomes in phacovitrectomy with gas tamponade in RRD.

Tasa de resangrado vítreo posterior a vitrectomía o facovitrectomía en pacientes con retinopatía diabética proliferativa: estudio retrospectivo / Vitreous rebleeding rate after vitrectomy or phacovitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A retrospective study

Antecedentes: La complicación más común tras la vitrectomía en pacientes es el resangrado en cavidad vítrea. Es importante detectar los distintos factores que pueden incrementar la tasa de resangrado vítreo en estos pacientes. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión retrospectiva de la tasa de resangrado de cavidad vítrea posterior a vitrectomía o facovitrectomía. Método: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y comparativo de pacientes con diagnóstico de retinopatía diabética proliferativa con procedimiento de facovitrectomía o vitrectomía. Se obtuvieron datos de antecedentes personales patológicos, tipo de intervención quirúrgica y grado del cirujano que realizó el procedimiento. Resultados: Se revisaron 1.227 expedientes de pacientes diabéticos sometidos a vitrectomía o facovitrectomía. El 65% presentaron hipertensión arterial sistémica. La tasa de filtración glomerular promedio fue del 63,50 (±32,36) ml/min/1,73m2 y la de hemoglobina glucosilada (HbA1c) del 8% (4,6 al 15%). En la comparación de variables se obtuvo una diferencia significativa de la tasa de resangrado vítreo comparando la facovitrectomía con la vitrectomía (p=0,003), y al relacionar la vitrectomía con el resangrado, se obtuvo una razón de momios de 1,44. Conclusión: Los resultados obtenidos muestran una menor tasa de resangrado en los pacientes con retinopatía diabética proliferativa sometidos a facovitrectomía.(AU)

Background: The most common complication after vitrectomy is the rebleeding in vitreous cavity. It is important to detect the different factors that can increase the vitreous rebleeding rate in these patients. Objective: To carry out a retrospective review of the rate of vitreous rebleeding after vitrectomy or phacovitrectomy. Method: Retrospective, descriptive and comparative study of patients with a diagnosis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with phacovitrectomy or vitrectomy procedure. Personal background data, type of surgical intervention and grade of the surgeon who carried out the procedure were obtained. Results: One thousand two hundred twenty-seven files of diabetic patients with vitrectomy or phacovitrectomy were reviewed. Sixty-five percent presented systemic arterial hypertension. The average glomerular filtration rate was 63.50 (±32.36)ml/min/1.73m2 and glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA1C) of 8% (4.6-15%). In the comparison of variables, a significant difference in the rate of vitreous rebleeding was obtained comparing phacovitrectomy with vitrectomy (P=.003), in the relationship between vitrectomy with vitreous rebleeding, an odds ratio of 1.44 was obtained. Conclusion: The results obtained show a lower rate of rebleeding in patients undergoing phacovitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.(AU)

Accuracy of intraocular lens formulas in combined phacovitrectomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the refractive accuracy of eight intraocular lens (IOL) formulas in eyes that underwent combined phacovitrectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 59 eyes that underwent uncomplicated phacovitrectomy between 2017 and 2020 at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute. Inclusion criteria were postoperative best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better within 6 months of surgery and IOL implantation in the capsular bag. The Barrett Universal II (BUII), Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVOv2.0), Hill-Radial Basis Function (Hill-RBFv3.0), Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Kane, Ladas Super Formula (LSF), and SRK/T formulas were compared for accuracy in predicting postoperative spherical equivalents (SE) using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess correlations between biometric parameters and errors for all formulas. RESULTS: Prediction errors of SE ranged from - 1.69 to 1.43 diopters (D), mean absolute errors (MAE) ranged from 0.39 to 0.47 D, and median absolute errors (MedAE) ranged from 0.23 to 0.37 D among all formulas. The BUII had the lowest mean error (- 0.043), MAE (0.39) and MedAE (0.23). The BUII also had the highest percentage of eyes with predicted error within ± 0.25 D (51%) and ± 0.50 D (83%). Based on MedAE however, no pairwise comparisons resulted in statistically significant differences. Axial length (AL) was positively correlated with the error from the Hoffer Q and Holladay I formulas (correlation coefficients = 0.34, 0.30, p values < 0.01, 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSION: While all eight IOL formulas had comparable accuracy in predicting refractive outcomes in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy, the BUII and Kane formulas had a tendency to greater accuracy.

Posterior synechia formation after phacovitrectomy - Predicting factors and the role of short-acting mydriatics.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of topical short-acting mydriatics on the formation of posterior synechia after phacovitrectomy surgery of pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: A prospective randomised controlled trial. Fifty-seven adult (>18 years old) patients (57 eyes) who underwent phacovitrectomy surgery at a single tertiary hospital, were randomly divided into two groups. The control group (29 eyes) received standard postoperative treatment (topical antibiotics and steroids). The study group (28 eyes) received short-acting mydriatics together with standard therapy. Patients were followed until 24 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the formation of posterior synechia during the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients developed posterior synechia during the follow-up period (12%), 3 in the study group (11%) and 4 in the control group (14%). There was no statistical difference between the groups. Significant associations for the development of posterior synechia were surgery for retinal detachment, longer surgery duration (>93 min) and the use of tamponade, in particular silicone oil. CONCLUSIONS: The use of topical short-acting mydriatic drops after phacovitrectomy surgery, in addition to standard post-operative treatment, did not reduce the formation of posterior synechia. However, we identified several factors that may influence or act as predictors for the development of posterior synechia: surgery for retinal detachment, using silicone oil tamponade and a longer surgery duration. Our findings may aid in the standardisation of post-phacovitrectomy surgery treatment and define potential at-risk patients who should be monitored more closely.

Vitreous rebleeding rate after vitrectomy or phacovitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The most common complication after vitrectomy is the rebleeding in vitreous cavity. It is important to detect the different factors that can increase the vitreous rebleeding rate in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To carry out a retrospective review of the rate of vitreous rebleeding after vitrectomy or phacovitrectomy. METHOD: Retrospective, descriptive and comparative study of patients with a diagnosis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with phacovitrectomy or vitrectomy procedure. Personal background data, type of surgical intervention and grade of the surgeon who carried out the procedure were obtained. RESULTS: 1227 files of diabetic patients with vitrectomy or phacovitrectomy were reviewed. 65% presented systemic arterial hypertension. The average glomerular filtration rate was 63.50 (±32.36) ml/min/1.73 m2 and glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA1C) of 8% (4.6 to 15%). In the comparison of variables, a significant difference in the rate of vitreous rebleeding was obtained comparing phacovitrectomy with vitrectomy. (p = 0.003), in the relationship between vitrectomy with vitreous rebleeding, an odds ratio of 1.44 was obtained. CONCLUSION: The results obtained show a lower rate of rebleeding in patients undergoing phacovitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Pars Plana Vitrectomy Alone or Combined with Phacoemulsification to Treat Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review of the Recent Literature.

Pars plana vitrectomy is today a common first-line procedure for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Removal or preservation of the natural lens at the time of vitrectomy is associated with both advantages and disadvantages. The combination of cataract extraction (i.e., phacoemulsification) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPVc) enhances visualization of the peripheral retina and the surgical management of the vitreous base. However, PPVc prolongs the surgical time and is associated with iatrogenic loss of the accommodation function in younger patients, possible postoperative anisometropia, and unexpected refractive results. Performance of pars plana vitrectomy alone (PPVa) requires good technical skills to minimize the risk of lens damage, and quickens cataract development. We retrieved all recent papers that directly compared PPVc and PPVa using parameters that we consider essential when choosing between the two procedures (the success rate of anatomical RRD repair, postoperative refractive error, intra- and postoperative complications, and costs). PPVa and PPVc were generally comparable in terms of RRD anatomical repair. PPVc was associated with fewer intraoperative, but more postoperative, complications. Macula-off RRD PPVc treatment was often associated with undesirable myopic refractive error. PPVa followed by phacoemulsification was the most expensive procedure.

Rotational stability of plate haptic toric intraocular lenses after combined 25-gauge vitrectomy and cataract surgery.

AIM: To evaluate the postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) rotational stability and residual refractive astigmatism following combined 25-gauge vitrectomy and cataract surgery with implantation of a plate haptic toric IOL. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 32 eyes of 32 patients underwent a combined 25-gauge vitrectomy and phacoemulsification for vitreoretinal diseases and cataract with regular corneal astigmatism of at least 1 diopter (D). A plate haptic toric IOL (AT Torbi 709M, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) was implanted in all eyes. The outcome measures were rotational stability and refractive astigmatism up to 6mo postoperatively as well as the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Preoperative refractive astigmatism was 2.14±1.17 D, which was significantly reduced to 0.77±0.37 D six to eight weeks postoperatively and remained stable throughout the observation period (0.67±0.44 D at three months and 0.75±0.25 D at six months; for all groups: P<0.0001 compared to baseline). BCVA improved significantly from 0.36±0.33 logMAR preoperatively to 0.10±0.15 logMAR following surgery (P=0.02). Mean IOL axis deviation from the target axis was 3.4°±2.9° after six to eight weeks and significantly decreased over time (2.4°±2.6° six months after surgery; P=0.04). In one patient IOL, re-alignment was performed. CONCLUSION: Corneal astigmatism is significantly reduced following combined 25-gauge vitrectomy and cataract surgery. The plate haptic toric IOL position and axis remain stable during the observation period of six months.

Intraoperative challenges and complications of cataract surgery between cataract surgery alone and phacovitrectomy in eyes with diabetic retinopathy: efficacy of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery.

BACKGROUND: To compare the intraoperative challenges, complications, and operation time of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery between cataract surgery only and phacovitrectomy in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: One university hospital, retrospective case series. Two hundred ninety-five eyes of 295 consecutive patients with diabetic retinopathy who underwent cataract surgery only or phacovitrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperative challenges and complications of cataract surgery were thoroughly analyzed by 3D viewing of digitally recorded videos. The pupil diameter, operation time, and improved efficacy (100/operation time × pupil diameter) were compared between the cataract surgery only and phacovitrectomy groups. RESULTS: Of the 295 eyes, 211 underwent cataract surgery only, and 84 underwent phacovitrectomy. Intraoperative challenges such as small pupil, miosis, or poor red reflex occurred more frequently (46 [21.8%] vs. 28 [33.3%], p = 0.029); pupil diameter was smaller (7.34 ± 0.94 vs. 6.89 ± 0.88 mm, p < 0.001) in the phacovitrectomy group than in the cataract surgery only group; however, rates of posterior capsule rupture and operation time were not different between the two groups (0 [0%] vs. 1 [1.2%], p = 0.285; 16.54 ± 2.65 vs. 16.31 ± 4.30 min, p = 0.434). Improved efficacy was higher in the phacovitrectomy group (0.85 ± 0.18 vs. 0.97 ± 0.28, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an illuminated chopper is a potential solution for diabetic cataract surgery, particularly in phacovitrectomy, by decreasing the use of supplemental devices, operation time, and posterior capsule rupture. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Combined versus Sequential Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Phacoemulsification for Macular Hole and Epiretinal Membrane: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

TOPIC: Comparing the efficacy and safety between combined and sequential pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification for macular hole (MH) and epiretinal membrane (ERM). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The standard of care for MH and ERM is vitrectomy, which increases the risk of developing cataract. Combined phacovitrectomy eliminates the need for a second surgery. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched in May 2022 for all articles comparing combined versus sequential phacovitrectomy for MH and ERM. The primary outcome was mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months follow-up. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for observational studies (PROSPERO, registration number, CRD42021257452). RESULTS: Of the 6470 studies found, 2 RCTs and 8 nonrandomized retrospective comparative studies were identified. Total eyes for combined and sequential groups were 435 and 420, respectively. Meta-analysis suggested no significant difference between combined and sequential surgery for 12-month BCVA (combined = 0.38 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; sequential = 0.36 logMAR; mean difference = + 0.02 logMAR; 95% confidence interval = -0.04 to 0.08; P = 0.51; I2 = 0%; n = 4 studies, 398 participants), as well as absolute refractive error (P = 0.76; I2 = 97%; n = 4 studies, 289 participants), risk of myopia (P = 0.15; I2 = 66%; n = 2 studies, 148 participants), MH nonclosure (P = 0.57; I2 = 48%; n = 4 studies, 321 participants), cystoid macular edema (P = 0.15; I2 = 0%; n = 6 studies, 526 participants), high-intraocular pressure (P = 0.09; I2 = 0%; n = 2 studies, 161 participants), posterior capsule opacification (P = 0.46; I2 = 0%; n = 2 studies, 161 participants), posterior capsule rupture (P = 0.41; I2 = 0%; n = 5 studies, 455 participants), and retinal detachment (P = 0.67; I2 = 0%; n = 6 studies, 545 participants). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was detected between combined and sequential surgeries for visual outcomes, refractive outcomes, or complications. Given that most studies were retrospective and contained a high RoB, future high-quality RCTs are warranted. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Clinical Outcomes of Combined Phacoemulsification With Intraocular Lens Placement and Microincision Vitrectomy in Adult Vitreoretinal Disease.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) placement and microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) in adult patients with concomitant cataract and vitreoretinal disease. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with comorbid vitreoretinal disease and cataract who had combined phacoemulsification with IOL placement and MIVS was retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome measures were visual acuity (VA) and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: The analysis comprised 648 eyes of 611 patients. The median follow-up was 26.9 months (range, 12-60 months). The most common vitreoretinal pathology was intraocular tumor (53%). The best-corrected Snellen VA improved from 20/192 at baseline to 20/46 at the 12-month follow-up. The most frequent intraoperative complication was capsule tear (3.9%). The most common postoperative adverse events after 3 months of follow-up (mean, 24 months) were vitreous hemorrhage (3.2%) and retinal detachment (1.8%). No patient developed endophthalmitis. Conclusions: Combined phacoemulsification with IOL placement and MIVS is a safe, effective technique to manage a broad range of vitreoretinal diseases in patients with significant cataract.

Corneal densitometry: an innovative method to quantitatively evaluate corneal changes after phacovitrectomy.

BACKGROUND: To quantitatively investigate corneal changes and the correlation between corneal densitometry (CD) and endothelial parameters after phacovitrectomy. METHODS: Thirty-eight eyes with idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (iFTMHs) and cataracts underwent phacovitrectomy. Examinations were conducted at baseline and Day 1, Day 7, Month 1, and Month 3 postoperatively. CD and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured using Pentacam. Corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonality (HEX) were measured using specular microscopy. RESULTS: ECD and HEX significantly decreased after surgery and the change in HEX occurred prior to CV. CCT increased immediately after surgery and recovered 3 months postoperatively. CD values increased significantly 1 day after surgery and then gradually decreased. For CD in the 0-2 mm zone, it took 1 month to recover in the central and posterior layers and 3 months in the anterior and total layers. For CD in the 2-6 mm zone, the central layer recovered at Day 7, the anterior and total layers recovered at 1 month, and the posterior layer did not recover until 3 months postoperatively. The CD within all layers in the 0-2 mm zone was positively correlated with CCT. Posterior CD in the 0-2 mm zone was negatively correlated with ECD and HEX. CONCLUSIONS: CD is not only correlated with CCT, ECD, and HEX but also reflects the state of the whole cornea and each layer. CD can be an objective, rapid, and noninvasive tool that reflects corneal health and undetectable edema and monitors the process of lesion repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (31/10/2021, ChiCTR2100052554).

Comparison of Refractive Outcomes in Patients with Highly Myopic Versus Non-highly Myopic Eyes Undergoing Phacovitrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Combined phacovitrectomy is gaining popularity due to efficiency and immediate visual improvement. However, concerns regarding erroneous intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in combination surgery are increasing, such as myopic shift owing to a thick macula and consequent underestimation of the axial length. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the refractive outcomes of combined phacovitrectomy in patients with highly myopic and non-highly myopic eyes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who received combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and small gauge pars plana vitrectomy for cataract and macular pathologies in highly myopic and non-highly myopic eyes. Pre- and postoperative evaluation and ocular parameters were recorded, and analyses were performed using the Student's t test and regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients with macular pathologies, including myopic tractional maculopathy, macular hole, and epiretinal membrane, were enrolled. SRK II or SRK/T models were used for calculating IOL. The mean absolute error of refraction change was 0.65 D; 83.5% of patients were within 1-D error, 57.9% within 0.5-D error, and 35.3% within 0.25-D error, with SRK/T showing better precision and yielding more myopic shift. Furthermore, the predictive accuracy of SRK II or SRK/T was better in patients with non-highly myopic eyes. Moreover, Barrett's universal II formula was not superior to SRK II or SRK/T in the prediction of postoperative refractive error (p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: Refractive outcomes were satisfactory in the cohort of patients with highly myopic eyes. The combined implementation of SRK II and SRK/T was not inferior to Barrett's universal II formula in predicting satisfactory refractive outcomes. Combination surgery can be an option for patients with both cataract and macular pathologies.

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification versus pars plana vitrectomy only for treatment of phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual, refractive, and anatomical outcomes and incidence of complications between combined pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification (phacovitrectomy) versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV-only) in phakic eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science to identify relevant articles. Prospective or retrospective studies comparing PPV-only and phacovitrectomy for RRD were included. Recruited studies provided information about at least anatomical success or refractive outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed for single surgery success rate, final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), postoperative complications, mean predicted refractive error, and mean absolute predicted refractive error. RESULTS: Seven studies (788 eyes) were selected, including two clinical trials and five retrospective comparative case series. The single surgery success rate was similar in PPV-only and phacovitrectomy groups (risk ratio [RR] = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.10; P = 0.57). Mean final BCVA was significantly better in the PPV-only group than the phacovitrectomy group (MD = 0.06; 95% CI 0.00-0.12; P = 0.04). The risk of epiretinal membrane formation was significantly higher in eyes that underwent phacovitrectomy than PPV-only (RR = 2.85; 0.95% CI 1.5-5.41; P = 0.001). Phacovitrectomy group showed a more myopic final mean predicted refractive error than PPV-only group (MD = -0.31; 95% CI -0.55--0.07; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the anatomical outcome. Slightly better visual and refractive results were observed in the PPV-only group. However, the results should be interpreted with caution as the majority of included studies were low-quality retrospective studies.

Prospective comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in phacovitrectomy: a pilot study in a real-world clinical practice.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations among IOL formulas after phacovitrectomy. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 206 eyes of 206 patients who underwent 25-gauge phacovitrectomy, without gas tamponade, for macular pathology. Pre-operative optical biometry used the IOLMaster 700 to calculate the IOL power with the new formulas, i.e. the Barrett Universal II (BU II), Emmetropia Verifying Optical version 2.0, Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF) version 3.0, Kane, and Ladas Super Formula, and conventional formulas, i.e. Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/T (SRK/T). A single-piece foldable IOL was implanted in all cases. Manifest refractions were measured before and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: The BU II formula showed the lowest standard deviation and mean and median absolute errors and had the highest percentage of eyes with a refractive prediction error within ± 0.25 D. The absolute error was significantly lower with the four new formulas, except the Hill-RBF, than with the Hoffer Q (all p = ≤ 0.010) and Holladay 1 formulas (all p = < 0.010). The absolute error with the BU II formula was also lower than that with the Holladay 2 (p = 0.012) and SRK/T (p = 0.024) formulas. CONCLUSION: Overall, the new IOL formulas, except the Hill-RBF, were superior to some of the conventional formulas for calculating IOL power in phacovitrectomy.

Refractive error after combined phaco-vitrectomy: A multicentric study.

PURPOSE: To study the post-operative refractive error (RE) of patients undergoing combined phaco-vitrectomy and to find out which intraocular lens (IOL)-power formula had the best refractive outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentric study we compared the preoperative expected target with the postoperative RE of patients undergoing combined phaco-vitrectomy due to vitreomacular traction, macular pucker, full thickness macular hole or lamellar macular hole. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to compare the postoperative REs and the differences between expected and postoperative REs among the SRK-T, Olsen's and Holladay-2 formulas. The correlation between the difference in REs and IOL-power was also studied. RESULTS: Sixty-seven eyes with a mean axial length of 23.73 ± 1.21 mm were included. Forty-two (63%), 14 (21%) and 11 (16%) eyes were implanted with an IOL that was calculated respectively with SRK-T, Olsen's and the Holladay-2 formula. The mean preoperative expected- and post-operative REs were -0.16 ± 0.12D and -0.48 ± 0.17, respectively (p = 0.045). SRK-T and Holladay-2 formulas led to a significant myopic shift whereas Olsen's caused a significant hyperopic error, independently from the IOL power. CONCLUSION: Independently from the IOL power, none of the analyzed formulas is precise at calculating the post-operative RE.

Temporal Change in Anterior Chamber Depth after Combined Vitrectomy and Cataract Surgery Using Different Sizes of Intraocular Lens.

This study aimed to investigate the temporal changes in the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and refractive prediction error (RPE) of 6 and 7 mm diameter intraocular lenses (IOLs) after cataract surgery or phacovitrectomy with or without sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas. We reviewed 120 eyes (120 patients) and divided them into six groups: three groups of cataract surgery alone and phacovitrectomy (with or without SF6), which were further divided according to IOL diameter (6 and 7 mm) used. We examined the ACD and IOL position using a swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomograph at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively; and the RPE at 1 month postoperatively. The ACD and IOL position at postoperative day 1 in the SF6 injection groups were significantly smaller than those in the other groups (p < 0.01). At 1 week, the ACD and IOL position of the 6 mm IOL SF6 injection group was smaller than those in the other groups (p < 0.01); thus, complications such as synechia or pupillary capture should be considered in the early postopera-tive period of phacovitrectomy with SF6, especially in the 6 mm IOL. The ACD, IOL position, and RPE at 1 month did not significantly differ among the groups, regardless of the IOL diameter or SF6. In the SF6 injection groups, the ACD and IOL position gradually deepened with less gas.

Comparison of Postoperative Stability of Intraocular Lenses after Phacovitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

We retrospectively compared the stability of intraocular lenses (IOLs) routinely used at our institution by measuring IOL position after phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Patients with RRD who underwent phacovitrectomy with gas tamponade received one of three IOLs: 6-mm, single-piece NS-60YG (NIDEK, 15 eyes); 6-mm, single-piece XY1 (HOYA, 11 eyes); or 7-mm, three-piece X-70 (Santen, 11 eyes). Various parameters associated with the anterior chamber, lens, and IOL were measured by swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2; Tomey Corp) before and 1 week and 1 month after surgery. IOL position was determined as follows: IOL position = (postoperative aqueous depth [AQD] − preoperative AQD)/lens thickness. We found no significant difference in axial length between the IOLs (p = 0.97). At 1 week, IOL position was as follows: NS-60YG, 0.32; XY1, 0.24; and X-70, 0.26 (p < 0.05). The respective IOL positions at 1 month were 0.35, 0.27, and 0.28 (p < 0.01). These results indicated the smallest anterior shift with NS-60YG. To replicate the anterior shift of IOL position ex vivo, biomechanical measurement was performed. NS-60YG resisted more displacement force than the other IOLs. Thus, in eyes undergoing phacovitrectomy for RRD, NS-60YG was the most stable of the three IOLs studied.

Influence of combined phacovitrectomy without tamponade on intraocular lens displacement and postoperative refraction.

PURPOSE: To compare phacoemulsification versus phacovitrectomy regarding postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) shift and refraction. METHODS: This prospective bilateral comparison study included 40 eyes of 20 patients. Inclusion criteria were combined phacovitrectomy without gas/air tamponade in one eye and cataract surgery in the contralateral eye with implantation of the same IOL. Postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) was compared between both groups 1-5 hr, 1 day and 8 weeks after surgery. Postoperative refraction was compared after 8 weeks using the Holladay I, HofferQ, SRK/T, Haigis and Barrett formulae. RESULTS: There were no intergroup differences in ACD (8 weeks: 0.02 mm absolute difference, SD 0.22, range -0.36 to 0.65, p = 0.401), mean absolute refractive error (8 weeks: Holladay I p = 0.452; HofferQ p = 0.475; SRK/T p = 0.498; Haigis p = 0.869; and Barrett p = 0.352) or percentages within the 0.5 D and 1.0 D range at any time-point. All formulae were optimized for the phacovitrectomy and the cataract groups. There was no correlation of macular thickness change and refractive error (cataract group r2 = -0.13, p = 0.58; phacovitrectomy group r2 = -0.10, p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Combined phacovitrectomy without air/ gas tamponade caused neither ACD displacement nor refractive shifts compared to phacoemulsification alone. Surgically induced macular thickness change had no significant influence on postoperative refraction in this study. All five IOL formulae showed comparable postoperative refractive outcomes.