Early-stage postoperative depression and anxiety following orthognathic surgery: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to observe the incidence and potential risk factors of postoperative depression and anxiety in patients during the early period after undergoing orthognathic surgery. METHODS: From March 7 to September 7, 2023, patients ≥ 18 years of age who were scheduled for elective orthognathic surgery under general anesthesia in Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology were included in this study. We prospectively evaluated their degrees of pre- and postoperative depression and anxiety using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Associations between the perioperative factors and occurrences of postoperative anxiety and depression were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were included in the analysis. Within five days after surgery, we observed the occurrence of depression in 32% (116) of the patients and anxiety in 72.8% (270) of them. Their preoperative depression score on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and intraoperative urine output were significantly associated with a higher risk of postoperative depression. The presence of preoperative anxiety, postoperative moderate-to-severe pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative insomnia were significantly associated with a higher risk of postoperative anxiety. Furthermore, a monthly income ≥ ¥10000 was found to be significantly associated with a lower risk of postoperative anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative depression and anxiety are common among patients who undergo orthognathic surgery. Moreover, preoperative psychological status and incidence of postoperative adverse events were associated with an increased risk of depression and anxiety after surgery. The results of the present study suggest that careful psychological assessment and appropriate management are necessary to improve patients' recovery following orthognathic surgery.

Risk analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

AIMS: This study is designed to identify risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and establish a nomogram model. METHODS: In this retrospective and multicenter study, we collected and analyzed data from 1233 patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. The Lasso algorithm was used to optimize the selection of independent variables in the development group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors of PONV to develop the predictive nomogram model. Finally, we used an internal and external verification group and machine learning (ML) to evaluate the accuracy and clinical applicability of the model. RESULTS: The dosage of sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), the dosage of remifentanil, the use of neostigmine, duration of surgery and the maximum value of the PETCO2 were risk factors of PONV in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. In contrast, the dosage of propofol during the surgery and the use of steroids were protective factors. The nomogram was then established to predict the incidence of PONV in these patients based on the above eight indicators. The C-index of the development group, internal, and external verification groups are 0.802, 0.857, and 0.966, respectively. CONCLUSION: A nomogram model was developed to predict the incidence of PONV in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. This model was found to be reliable and of high clinical value.

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum analgesia in Japan: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS: This study aims to investigate the clinical practice of physicians working in obstetric setting toward postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) with neuraxial anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted this online survey to all active members of the Japan Society of Obstetric Anesthesiology and Perinatology (JSOAP), where leads academic society in obstetric anesthesia in Japan. The questionnaire was developed using the Delphi method. The survey included questions about routine practices for PONV prevention, the use of neuraxial opioids, optimal practices, and perceived obstacles. The email sent three times every 2 weeks as a reminder. RESULTS: A total of 1046 e-mails were sent, and 307 JSOAP members responded to the survey (29.3%). More than half of responders (62.7%) used neuraxial opioids with intrathecal morphine being the most frequent. They had a higher rate of multimodal PONV prophylaxis compared with who did not use neuraxial opioids for postoperative analgesia (19.9% vs 6.7%). Metoclopramide was the commonest medication for PONV prevention, and there was a significant difference in the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists (19.9% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.012). We observed that 80% of physicians reported the routine administration of prophylaxis for PONV for CD. Among these, 20% indicated the use of two or more agents. Conversely, in the cohort not administering neuraxial opioids, only 6.7% reported the use of two or more agents. CONCLUSION: The online survey showed that the physicians using neuraxial opioids for CD had a higher proportion of multimodal PONV management involving two or more agents.

Effect of preprocedure anxiety and oestrogen levels on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for infertility: A prospective observational pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Females undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries have a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Apart from the established risk factors, hormonal, psychological, genetic and ethnic factors may also contribute to postoperative nausea and vomiting. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative anxiety and serum oestrogen level with postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy - hysteroscopy for infertility. METHODS: In total, 100 female patients, between the ages of 20-40 years, undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy - hysteroscopy for infertility were recruited for this study. Preoperative anxiety level was assessed using Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) Questionnaire. Serum oestrogen samples were taken before anaesthesia. Postoperative nausea and vomiting grading was rated with 0-3 Likert-type scale. An association of anxiety and oestrogen levels to postoperative nausea and vomiting was done. RESULTS: The analysis between median DASS 21 scores to postoperative nausea and vomiting grading showed no association between DASS 21 scores and postoperative nausea and vomiting grades. Comparing the mean oestrogen levels in patients among each grade of postoperative nausea and vomiting showed no significant difference in the mean oestrogen levels. CONCLUSION: Our study did not find evidence of a significant association between serum oestrogen levels, preoperative anxiety, and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Effectiveness of tranexamic acid on intra- and postoperative bleeding in Bimaxillary osteotomies: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Perioperative bleeding is a serious concern during orthognathic surgery. Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic lysine analog with antifibrinolytic properties, reduces blood loss across various surgical fields. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of preoperative TXA administration in reducing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss following combined Le Fort I and sagittal split ramus osteotomies at our hospital. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent combined Le Fort I and sagittal split ramus osteotomies between November 2017 and October 2022. The primary outcome was the volume of intraoperative blood loss. RESULTS: Among 1,329 eligible patients, 87 were included in the analysis (32 in the TXA group and 55 in the control group, where no TXA was administered). The median (interquartile range) intraoperative blood loss was 200.0 (157.5-237.5) mL in the TXA group and 260.0 (180.0-350.0) mL in the control group, showing a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0365). However, postoperative blood drainage within 24 h and 24-48 h did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A single intravenous administration of TXA was associated with a decrease in intraoperative bleeding without severe adverse events during combined Le Fort I and sagittal split ramus osteotomies. However, postoperative blood loss, nausea, vomiting, and autologous blood transfusion were not significantly associated with this administration.

A comparison of ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting for patients with or without preoperative anxiety with painless egg retrieval: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Background: Patients undergoing painless egg retrieval are prone to preoperative anxiety, and whether preoperative anxiety induces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is debated. The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was to compare the clinical effect of ondansetron in preventing PONV for patients with and without preoperative anxiety. The secondary objective was to investigate whether preoperative anxiety was associated with PONV. Methods: The self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) was used to assess the anxiety patients undergoing painless egg retrieval. Patients with a SAS standard score of 50-60 were selected to the anxiety group (n=105); and patients with a SAS standard score of 25-35 were assigned to the non-anxiety group (n=104). Venous blood samples of both groups of patients were obtained during admission and 1 hour after surgery, and all serotonin (5-HT) levels were tested using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The anxiety group was then randomly assigned into two subgroups: ondansetron (AO group, n=53) and placebo saline (AS group, n=52). Similarly, patients in the non-anxiety group were also randomly assigned to one of two subgroups: ondansetron (NO group, n=51) and placebo saline (NS group, n=53). The AO and NO groups received 8 mg (4 mL) of intravenous ondansetron 15 minutes before surgery, while the AS and NS groups received an equivalent volume (4 mL) of normal saline. We then analyzed the vital signs, risk factors for nausea and vomiting, intraoperative anesthetic doses, incidences of nausea and vomiting in 24 hours after surgery, serum 5-HT level before and after surgery, other adverse responses, pain scores, and satisfaction. Results: A total of 200 patients eventually completed this study. The serum 5-HT values in the anxiety group were higher before and after surgery than in the non-anxiety group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in serum 5-HT before and after surgery in the same group (P>0.05). The incidence of PONV was more significant in the AS group than in the NS group (P<0.05). The incidence of PONV was also higher in the AS group than in the AO group (P<0.05). Still, there was no statistically significant difference between the NO and NS groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences between the four groups in vital signs, risk factors for nausea and vomiting, intraoperative anesthetic doses, other adverse responses and pain scores (P>0.05). Patients in the AS group had lower satisfaction scores than those in the other three groups (P<0.05). Conclusions: Patients experiencing preoperative anxiety have a greater risk of PONV following painless egg retrieval compared to those without preoperative anxiety. Ondansetron can reduce the occurrence of PONV in patients with preoperative anxiety, but it has no discernible preventative effect in non-anxious patients. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400079504.

Transcutaneous Pericardium 6 Acupoint Electrical Stimulation Provides Comparable Antiemetic Effect to Granisetron When Combined With Dexamethasone in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative transcutaneous pericardium 6 (P6) electrical stimulation is effective for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The patients undergoing breast cancer surgery have a high PONV prevalence; however, the effectiveness of P6 stimulation in this surgical population has not been investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 198 patients undergoing mastectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to the one of three treatments: P6 stimulation + dexamethasone (group PD, n = 66), granisetron + dexamethasone (group GD, n = 66), and dexamethasone alone (group DM, n = 66). The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative vomiting (POV) within postoperative 48h. The secondary endpoints included the use of rescue antiemetic, severity of POV, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and other adverse events. RESULTS: The incidence of POV in group PD (9.1%) was similar to group GD (10.6%, P = 0.770), but significantly lower than that in the group DM (28.8%, P = 0.004) within postoperative 48 h. And, the incidence of postoperative nausea was similar between group PD and group GD but lower than that in group DM. The use of rescue antiemetics had no statistical differences among the three groups. The median (interquartile range) scores of POV severity were higher in group GD [6.0 (5.0, 7.0)] than in group DM [4.0 (3.0, 6.0), P = 0.012] within postoperative 48 h, but similar to group PD [5.5 (4.0, 6.3), P = 0.208]. CONCLUSIONS: Combined with dexamethasone, P6 stimulation has similar effectiveness for PONV prophylaxis with 5- hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonist granisetron but lower cost of antiemetic use. Moreover, both groups had a lower incidence of PONV and higher satisfaction than dexamethasone alone in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

The efficacy of buprenorphine compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study compares dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine as potential adjuvants for spinal anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine enhances sensory block and minimizes the need for pain medication, while buprenorphine, a long-acting opioid, exhibits a favorable safety profile compared to traditional opioids. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were systematically searched in December 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs with patients scheduled for lower abdominal, pelvic, or lower limb surgeries; undergoing spinal anesthesia with a local anesthetic and buprenorphine or dexmedetomidine. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 604 patients were included. Compared with dexmedetomidine, buprenorphine significantly reduced time for sensory regression to S1 (Risk Ratio [RR = -131.28]; 95% CI -187.47 to -75.08; I2 = 99%) and motor block duration (RR = -118.58; 95% CI -170.08 to -67.09; I2 = 99%). Moreover, buprenorphine increased the onset time of sensory block (RR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.81; I2 = 93%) and increased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 4.06; 95% CI 1.80 to 9.18; I² = 0%). No significant differences were observed in the duration of analgesia, onset time of motor block, time to achieve the highest sensory level, shivering, hypotension, or bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: The intrathecal administration of buprenorphine, when compared to dexmedetomidine, is linked to reduction in the duration of both sensory and motor blocks following spinal anesthesia. Conversely, buprenorphine was associated with an increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and a longer onset time of sensory block. Further high-quality RCTs are essential for a comprehensive understanding of buprenorphine's effects compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia.

Predictive value of preoperative ultrasonographic measurement of gastric morphology for the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Background: Pre-operative prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is primarily based on the patient's medical history. The predictive value of gastric morphological parameters observed on ultrasonography has not been comprehensively assessed. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the pre-operative ultrasonographic measurement of gastric morphology for predicting PONV. The gastric antrum of the participants was assessed using ultrasound before anesthesia, and the occurrence of PONV in the first 6 hours and during the 6-24 hours after surgery was reported. The main indicators included the thickness of the muscularis propria (TMP) and the cross-sectional area of the inner side of the muscularis propria (CSA-ISMP). These were recorded and analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify factors for PONV. Results: A total of 72 patients scheduled for elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery were investigated in the study. The pre-operative CSA-ISMP of patients with PONV in the first 6 hours was significantly greater than that of those without PONV (2.765 ± 0.865 cm² vs 2.349 ± 0.881 cm², P=0.0308), with an area under the curve of 0.648 (95% CI, 0.518 to 0.778, P=0.031). Conversely, the pre-operative TMP of patients with PONV during the 6-24 hours was significantly smaller than that of those without PONV (1.530 ± 0.473 mm vs 2.038 ± 0.707 mm, P=0.0021), with an area under the curve of 0.722 (95% CI, 0.602 to 0.842, P=0.003). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that CSA-ISMP was an independent risk factor for PONV in the first 6 hours (OR=2.986, P=0.038), and TMP was an independent protective factor for PONV during the 6-24 hours after surgery (OR=0.115, P=0.006). Conclusion: Patients with a larger pre-operative CSA-ISMP or a thinner TMP are prone to develop PONV in the first 6 hours or during the 6-24 hours after surgery, respectively. China clinical trial registration center: http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100055068).

Association between operative position and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is one of the most effective ways to treat morbid obesity, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the common complications after bariatric surgery. At present, the mechanism of the high incidence of PONV after weight-loss surgery has not been clearly explained, and this study aims to investigate the effect of surgical position on PONV in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. AIM: To explore the effect of the operative position during bariatric surgery on PONV. METHODS: Data from obese patients, who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the authors' hospital between June 2020 and February 2022 were divided into 2 groups and retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and the t-test were used to study the influence of operative position on PONV. RESULTS: There were 15 cases of PONV in the supine split-leg group (incidence rate, 50%) and 11 in the supine group (incidence rate, 36.7%) (P = 0.297). The mean operative duration in the supine split-leg group was 168.23 ± 46.24 minutes and 140.60 ± 32.256 minutes in the supine group (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that operative position was not an independent risk factor for PONV (odds ratio = 1.192, 95% confidence interval: 0.376-3.778, P = 0.766). CONCLUSION: Operative position during LSG may affect PONV; however, the difference in the incidence of PONV was not statistically significant. Operative position should be carefully considered for obese patients before surgery.