RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The higher risk of COVID-19 in health care workers (HCWs) is well-known. However, the risk within HCWs is not fully understood. The objective was to compare the COVID-19 risk in intensive care unit (ICU) vs non-ICU locations. METHODS: A prospective surveillance study was conducted among HCWs at a large tertiary care facility in Riyadh between March 1st to November 30th, 2020. HCWs included both clinical (provide direct patient care) and nonclinical positions (do not provide direct patient care). RESULTS: A total 1,594 HCWs with COVID-19 were included; 103 (6.5%) working in ICU and 1,491 (93.5%) working in non-ICU locations. Compared with non-ICU locations, ICU had more nurses (54.4% vs 22.1%, P < .001) and less support staff (2.9% vs 53.1%, P < .001). COVID-19 infection was similar in ICU and non-ICU locations (9.0% vs 9.8%, P = .374). However, it was significantly higher in ICU nurses (12.3% vs 6.5%, P < .001). Support staff had higher risk than other HCWs, irrespective of ICU working status (15.1% vs 7.2%, P < 0.001). The crude relative risk of COVID-19 in ICU vs non-ICU locations was 0.92, 95% confidence interval ( was 0.76-1.11 (P = .374). However, relative risk adjusted for professional category was significantly increased to 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.50 (P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: ICU had a significantly higher risk of COVID-19 infection only after adjusting for the distribution and risk of different professional categories. The latter is probably determined by both exposure level and protection practices. The finding underscores the importance of strict implementation of preventive measures among all HCWs, including those performing nonclinical services.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Cuidados Críticos , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Although the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is lasting for more than 1 year, the exposition risks of health-care providers are still unclear. Available evidence is conflicting. We investigated the prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the staff of a large public hospital with multiple sites in the Antwerp region of Belgium. Risk factors for infection were identified by means of a questionnaire and human resource data. We performed hospital-wide serology tests in the weeks following the first epidemic wave (16 March to the end of May 2020) and combined the results with the answers from an individual questionnaire. Overall seroprevalence was 7.6%. We found higher seroprevalences in nurses [10.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.9-11.2] than in physicians 6.4% (95% CI 4.6-8.7), paramedical 6.0% (95% CI 4.3-8.0) and administrative staff (2.9%; 95% CI 1.8-4.5). Staff who indicated contact with a confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) colleague had a higher seroprevalence (12.0%; 95% CI 10.7-13.4) than staff who did not (4.2%; 95% CI 3.5-5.0). The same findings were present for contacts in the private setting. Working in general COVID-19 wards, but not in emergency departments or intensive care units, was also a significant risk factor. Since our analysis points in the direction of active SARS-CoV-2 transmission within hospitals, we argue for implementing a stringent hospital-wide testing and contact-tracing policy with special attention to the health care workers employed in general COVID-19 departments. Additional studies are needed to establish the transmission dynamics.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Bélgica/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The level of knowledge and training of nursing staff has been related to indicators of quality of care in health, although the application of indicators is still rare related to continuing education programs. The aim of this study was to use the training indicator to evaluate the efficiency of a Continuing Education Program focused on nursing staff in a Brazilian university hospital. In addition, it also checked if different nursing staff characteristics interfere in the training indicator. The number of hours that each nursing professional spent in the program was measured, and this indicator was related to professional features like professional category, unit of work, employment link and department. We note that inpatient sectors and high-complexity care feature a greater average number of hours when compared to units of lower complexity or support or administrative sectors. Another relevant point was the lower number of hours of training of nurses compared to other nursing categories, highlighting the need to consider different strategies for each nursing category. Despite this, nurses that perform assistance compared to those who perform only administrative activities showed no differences in participation. We observe that the profile of professionals was a relevant factor in participating in the program, and that this must be taken into consideration in the planning of continuing education programs. The program in this institution, which has compulsory participation during working hours, was also effective compared to the few studies that have measured the number of hours of training in hospitals of high complexity.
O nível de conhecimento e treinamento das equipes de enfermagem tem sido relacionado a indicadores de qualidade da assistência em saúde, embora ainda são raros a aplicação de indicadores relacionados a programas de educação continuada. O objetivo deste estudo foi usar um indicador de treinamento para medir a eficiência de um programa de educação continuada focado na equipe de enfermagem em um hospital universitário brasileiro de alta complexidade. Além disso, verificar se diferentes características do perfil do pessoal de enfermagem são capazes de interferir nos indicadores de treinamento. Foi mensurado o número de horas que cada profissional de enfermagem obteve no programa e este indicador foi relacionado a características do profissional como categoria profissional, unidade de trabalho, vínculo empregatício e departamento. Observamos que setores de internação e de alta complexidade apresentam um número médio de horas maior quando comparados a unidades de menor complexidade e setores de apoio e administrativos. Outro ponto relevante foi o menor número de horas de treinamento dos enfermeiros comparados a outras categorias, evidenciado a necessidade de se considerar diferentes estratégias para cada categoria. Apesar disto enfermeiros assistenciais comparados a aqueles que efetuam somente atividades administrativas não mostraram diferenças na participação. Observamos que o perfil dos profissionais foi fator relevante na participação no programa, e que estes devem ser levados em consideração no planejamento de programas de educação permanente. O programa, que nessa instituição tem participação obrigatória durante as horas de trabalho, também foi efetivo comparado a poucos estudos que tem mensurado o número de horas de capacitação em hospitais de grande complexidade.
Asunto(s)
Educación Continua , Hospitales Universitarios , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Grupo de Enfermería , Facultades de Enfermería , Administración de los Servicios de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , TutoríaRESUMEN
Studies with nursing continuing education are common in the literature with a predominance of qualitative approaches. Quantitative assessments are punctual and focused on a single quality indicator, and few studies relate these indicators to the profile of nursing staff. The objective of the study was to describe the Training Cycles of the Clinical Hospital of Uberlândia as a strategy of a Nursing Continuing Education Program and evaluate the attendance indicators and their association with the nursing staff profile. The Training Cycles of the Clinical Hospital of Uberlândia are cyclic courses that are offered continually, in a mandatory participation regime, during work hours, outside of the hospital, focused on Nursing staff. The study was conducted in 2013/2014 and has a documentary character. It was held in a public high complexity university hospital in Brazil. The Relative Frequency Attendance was calculated in relation to the nursing professional category and shift. Attendance indicators were affected by professional category. Participation increased over time for the technical level (assistants and nursing technicians) and decreased for nurses. We found an attendance rate of 54.49% in nursing hospital staff. The attendance indicators were also different for the period/shift of the course (gradual decrease of attendance from morning to afternoon to night). We also observed a decrease in attendance indicators over time. Attendance indicators were effective in describing the results of the Continuing Education Program and allowed the service administrators to associate the indicator results to the nursing profile. These results served as a basis for adjustments in the continuing education program of the institution.
Estudos com educação continuada em enfermagem são comuns na literatura, embora com predominância de abordagem qualitativa. Avaliações quantitativas são pontuais e concentradas em um único indicador de qualidade, e em raros casos relacionam estes indicadores com o perfil da enfermagem. O objetivo deste estudo foi descrever o Ciclo de Capacitação do Hospital de Clínicas de Uberlândia como uma estratégia de um Programa de Educação Continuada em Enfermagem e avaliar os indicadores de comparecimento desse programa e sua associação com o perfil dos profissionais de enfermagem. O Ciclo de Capacitação do Hospital de Clínicas de Uberlândia é um curso cíclico que é oferecido continuamente, em um regime de participação obrigatória, durante as horas de trabalho, fora do hospital, e dedicado à equipe de enfermagem. O estudo foi realizado em 2013/2014, tem caráter documental, foi realizado num hospital público, de alta complexidade e universitário no Brasil. Foi calculado a Frequência Relativa de Comparecimento em função da categoria profissional e do plantão. Observamos uma taxa de comparecimento de 54.49% para os profissionais de enfermagem do hospital. Os indicadores de comparecimento foram afetados pela categoria profissional (aumento da participação ao longo do tempo para os profissionais de nível técnico (auxiliares e técnicos de enfermagem) e diminuição da participação dos enfermeiros. Houve diferenças entre os turnos de oferecimento do curso (diminuição gradativa da participação da manhã para a tarde e desta para a noite). Observou-se também a redução nos indicadores de comparecimento ao longo dos cursos em função do tempo de oferecimento. Os indicadores de comparecimento propostos foram eficazes em descrever os resultados e o comportamento do programa de educação continuada e permitiram associar seus resultados ao perfil dos profissionais de enfermagem e serviram de embasamento para ajustes no programa de educação permanente da instituição.