Moyamoya syndrome after proton beam therapy in a pediatric patient with a pineal germ cell tumor and a germline polymorphism in RNF213.

The effects of RNF213, which leads to moyamoya disease susceptibility, on radiation-induced moyamoya syndrome (MMS) remain unknown. We report a case of MMS after proton beam therapy (PBT) was deployed to treat a brain tumor in a patient with an RNF213 polymorphism. An 8-year-old boy underwent whole ventricular and local PBT for a pineal germ cell tumor and was diagnosed with radiation-induced MMS 9 months later. He underwent right and left revascularization surgeries for cerebral hemodynamic compromise at 17- and 18-years of age, respectively. Genetic analysis revealed a heterozygous germline polymorphism RNF213 p.R4810K. This is the first report to suggest an association between RNF213 polymorphism and radiation-induced MMS.

Characterisation of 3D-printable thermoplastics to be used as tissue-equivalent materials in photon and proton beam radiotherapy end-to-end quality assurance devices.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential of 3D-printable thermoplastics as tissue-equivalent materials to be used in multimodal radiotherapy end-to-end quality assurance (QA) devices. APPROACH: Six thermoplastics were investigated: Polylactic Acid (PLA), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PETG), Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA), High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) and StoneFil. Measurements of mass density (ρ), Relative Electron Density (RED), in a nominal 6MV photon beam, and Relative Stopping Power (RSP), in a 210MeV proton pencil-beam, were performed. Average Hounsfield Units (HU) were derived from CTs acquired with two independent scanners. The calibration curves of both scanners were used to predict average ρ, RED and RSP values and compared against the experimental data. Finally, measured data of ρ, RED and RSP was compared against theoretical values estimated for the thermoplastic materials and biological tissues. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, good ρ and RSP CT predictions were made; only PMMA and PETG showed differences >5%. The differences between experimental and CT predicted RED values were also <5% for PLA, ABS, PETG and PMMA; for HIPS and StoneFil higher differences were found (6.94% and 9.42/15.34%, respectively). Small HUs variations were obtained in the CTs for all materials indicating good uniform density distribution in the samples production. ABS, PLA, PETG and PMMA showed potential equivalency for a variety of soft tissues (adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, brain and lung tissues, differences within 0.19% - 8.35% for all properties). StoneFil was the closest substitute to bone, but differences were >10%. Theoretical calculations of all properties agreed with experimental values within 5% difference for most thermoplastics. SIGNIFICANCE: Several 3D-printed thermoplastics were promising tissue-equivalent materials to be used in devices for end-to-end multimodal radiotherapy QA and may not require corrections in treatment planning systems' dose calculations. Theoretical calculations showed promise in identifying thermoplastics matching target biological tissues before experiments are performed.

Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Facilitates the Safe Treatment of Extended Radiation Targets for Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Report from the Proton Collaborative Group Registry.

Because proton beam therapy (PBT) can lower the dose of radiation to the heart, lungs, and breast, it is an established radiation modality for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Pencil beam scanning (PBS) PBT facilitates the treatment of more extensive targets. This may be especially of value for lymphoma patients who require RT to both mediastinal and axillary targets, defined here as extended target RT (ETRT), given the target distribution and need to minimize the lung, heart, and breast dose. Using the Proton Collaborative Group registry, we identified patients with HL treated with PBT to both their mediastinum and axilla, for which DICOM-RT was available. All patients were treated with PBS. To evaluate the dosimetric impact of PBS, we compared delivered PBS plans with VMAT butterfly photon plans optimized to have the same target volume coverage, when feasible. Between 2016 and 2021, twelve patients (median 26 years) received PBS ETRT (median 30.6 Gy (RBE)). Despite the large superior/inferior (SI, median 22.2 cm) and left/right (LR, median 22.8 cm) extent of the ETRT targets, all patients were treated with one isocenter except for two patients (both with SI and LR > 30 cm). Most commonly, anterior beams, with or without posterior beams, were used. Compared to photons, PBS had greater target coverage, better conformity, and lower dose heterogeneity while achieving lower doses to the lungs and heart, but not to the breast. No acute grade 3+ toxicities were reported, including pneumonitis. Proton ETRT in this small cohort was safely delivered with PBS and was associated with an improved sparing of the heart and lungs compared to VMAT.

The Impact of Dose Calibration Point Differences Between the Treatment Plan and Patient-specific Quality Assurance in Passive Scattering Proton Beam Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Passive scattering proton beam therapy (PSPT) is performed by taking actual measurements of all pre-designated fields in a treatment plan followed by appropriate adjustments to the prescribed dose. For this reason, it is necessary to ensure precision management of the measurements (patient-specific calibration) in the administration of a planned dose. Therefore, this study investigated the impact on dose distribution in treatment planning when the patient calibration point differs from the normalized point in a treatment plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 16 cases were selected, where the patient calibration point and normalized point did not match, and the normalized point used in the treatment plan was changed to the patient calibration point using a treatment planning system (VQA ver. 2.01, HITACHI). At this point, the displacement of the relative dose at the isocenter was estimated as an error owing to the difference compared to the patient calibration point. RESULTS: Overall, the error was within the range of ±1.5%, with the exception of orbit cases. Calibrated points also tended to be lower than the normalized points in the treatment plan. In terms of treatment sites, a greater deviation was observed for head cases. Cases with a large deviation in sites other than the head were attributed to poor flatness within the radiation field owing to a narrower opening of the patient collimator. CONCLUSION: Dose measurement errors in PSPT due to differing calibration points were generally within ±1.5%, with higher deviations observed in head treatments because of complex structures and narrow collimator openings. A γ analysis for significant deviations showed a 98.7% passing rate, suggesting limited overall impact. It is important to select stable calibration points in dosimetry to ensure high precision in dose administration, particularly in complex treatment areas.

Proton Therapy for Spinal Tumors: A Consensus Statement from the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an important role in the management of primary spine tumors. The purpose of this consensus statement is to summarize safe and optimal delivery of PBT for spinal tumors. MATERIALS/METHODS: The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) Skull Base/Central nervous system (CNS)/Sarcoma Subcommittee consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists with specific expertise in spinal irradiation developed expert recommendations discussing treatment planning considerations and current approaches in the treatment of primary spinal tumors. RESULTS: CT Simulation: Factors that require significant consideration include: 1) patient comfort, 2) setup reproducibility and stability, and 3) accessibility of appropriate beam angles. SPINE STABILIZATION HARDWARE: If present, hardware should be placed with cross-links well above/below the level of the primary tumor to reduce the metal burden at the level of the tumor bed. New materials that can reduce uncertainties include polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and composite PEEK-carbon fiber implants. FIELD ARRANGEMENT: Appropriate beam selection is required to ensure robust target coverage and OAR sparing. Commonly, 2-4 treatment fields, typically from posterior and/or posterior-oblique directions, are utilized. TREATMENT PLANNING METHODOLOGY: Robust optimization is recommended for all pencil beam scanning plans (the preferred treatment modality) and should consider setup uncertainty (between 3-7 mm) and range uncertainty (3-3.5%). In the presence of metal hardware, use of an increased range uncertainty up to 5% is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The PTCOG Skull Base/CNS/Sarcoma Subcommittee has developed recommendations to enable centers to deliver PBT safely and effectively for the management of primary spinal tumors.

Proton Therapy in The Treatment of Head And Neck Cancers- Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Head and neck cancers rank as the seventh most common cancer worldwide, nearly half of which result in death. The most common treatment methods for head and neck cancers include radiotherapy and surgery. Proton therapy has emerged in radiotherapy for cases where tumors are located near anatomically sensitive areas where the radiation dose must be strictly limited. The purpose of the work is to discuss the role of the proton therapy in the treatment in various types of cancer, and particularly head and neck tumors. RECENT FINDINGS: Proton therapy allows for the delivery of radiation doses to critical organs to be reduced, resulting in a decrease in the occurrence of late adverse effects on these organs. The occurrence of side effects caused by proton therapy depends on the relative and absolute volume of organs at risk receiving specific radiation doses. Proton therapy represents a promising alternative to conventional radiotherapy due to the reduced number of complications in healthy tissues by delivering a lower radiation dose outside the tumor area.

Controversies in neuro-oncology: Focal proton versus photon radiation therapy for adult brain tumors.

Radiation therapy (RT) plays a fundamental role in the treatment of malignant and benign brain tumors. Current state-of-the-art photon- and proton-based RT combines more conformal dose distribution of target volumes and accurate dose delivery while limiting the adverse radiation effects. PubMed was systematically searched from from 2000 to October 2023 to identify studies reporting outcomes related to treatment of central nervous system (CNS)/skull base tumors with PT in adults. Several studies have demonstrated that proton therapy (PT) provides a reduced dose to healthy brain parenchyma compared with photon-based (xRT) radiation techniques. However, whether dosimetric advantages translate into superior clinical outcomes for different adult brain tumors remains an open question. This review aims at critically reviewing the recent studies on PT in adult patients with brain tumors, including glioma, meningiomas, and chordomas, to explore its potential benefits compared with xRT.

Proton beam therapy and dentofacial development in paediatric cancer patients: A scoping review.

Purpose: It is known that radiation to dentofacial structures during childhood can lead to developmental disturbances. However, this appears to be a relatively subordinated research subject. For this reason, this review aims to establish the current evidence base on the effect of PBT on dentofacial development in paediatric patients treated for cancer in the head and neck region. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify both published and unpublished studies or reports. A single reviewer completed initial screening of abstracts; 2 independent reviewers completed secondary screening and data extraction. A narrative synthesis was then conducted. Results: 82 records were screened in total, resulting in 11 included articles. These articles varied in terms of study design and reporting quality. Owing to both poor study reporting and limited patient numbers, it is not possible to determine the effect of cancer diagnosis, chronological age at treatment, radiation dose or treatment modality on the incidence of facial deformation or dental development anomalies. Conclusion: Disturbances in dentofacial development are an under-reported toxicity in paediatric cancer survivors treated with PBT to the head and neck. There is a need for more research on dentofacial toxicity reporting, focused on the impact of treatment age, radiation dose, concurrent therapies, and the subsequent impact on quality of life.

A deep-learning-based surrogate model for Monte-Carlo simulations of the linear energy transfer in primary brain tumor patients treated with proton-beam radiotherapy.

Objective.This study explores the use of neural networks (NNs) as surrogate models for Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations in predicting the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) of protons in proton-beam therapy based on the planned dose distribution and patient anatomy in the form of computed tomography (CT) images. As LETdis associated with variability in the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, we also evaluate the implications of using NN predictions for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models within a variable-RBE context.Approach.The predictive performance of three-dimensional NN architectures was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation on a cohort of brain tumor patients (n= 151). The best-performing model was identified and externally validated on patients from a different center (n= 107). LETdpredictions were compared to MC-simulated results in clinically relevant regions of interest. We assessed the impact on NTCP models by leveraging LETdpredictions to derive RBE-weighted doses, using the Wedenberg RBE model.Main results.We found NNs based solely on the planned dose distribution, i.e. without additional usage of CT images, can approximate MC-based LETddistributions. Root mean squared errors (RMSE) for the median LETdwithin the brain, brainstem, CTV, chiasm, lacrimal glands (ipsilateral/contralateral) and optic nerves (ipsilateral/contralateral) were 0.36, 0.87, 0.31, 0.73, 0.68, 1.04, 0.69 and 1.24 keV µm-1, respectively. Although model predictions showed statistically significant differences from MC outputs, these did not result in substantial changes in NTCP predictions, with RMSEs of at most 3.2 percentage points.Significance.The ability of NNs to predict LETdbased solely on planned dose distributions suggests a viable alternative to compute-intensive MC simulations in a variable-RBE setting. This is particularly useful in scenarios where MC simulation data are unavailable, facilitating resource-constrained proton therapy treatment planning, retrospective patient data analysis and further investigations on the variability of proton RBE.

Proton Beam Range and Charge Verification Using Multilayer Faraday Collector.

PURPOSE: A daily quality assurance (QA) check in proton therapy is ensuring that the range of each proton beam energy in water is accurate to 1 mm. This is important for ensuring that the tumor is adequately irradiated while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. It is also important to verify the total charge collected against the beam model. This work proposes a time-efficient method for verifying the range and total charge of proton beams at different energies using a multilayer Faraday collector (MLFC). METHODS: We used an MLFC-128-250 MeV comprising 128 layers of thin copper foils separated by thin insulating KaptonTM layers. Protons passing through the collector induce a charge on the metallic foils, which is integrated and measured by a multichannel electrometer. The charge deposition on the foils provides information about the beam range. RESULTS: Our results show that the proton beam range obtained using MLFC correlates closely with the range obtained from commissioning water tank measurements for all proton energies. Upon applying a range calibration factor, the maximum deviation is 0.4 g/cm2. The MLFC range showed no dependence on the number of monitor units and the source-to-surface distance. Range measurements collected over multiple weeks exhibited stability. The total charge collected agrees closely with the theoretical charge from the treatment planning system beam model for low- and mid-range energies. CONCLUSIONS: We have calibrated and commissioned the use of the MLFC to easily verify range and total charge of proton beams. This tool will improve the workflow efficiency of the proton QA.

Diffusion decrease in normal-appearing white matter structures following photon or proton irradiation indicates differences in regional radiosensitivity.

PURPOSE: Radio(chemo)therapy (RCT) as part of the standard treatment of glioma patients, inevitably leads to radiation exposure of the tumor-surrounding normal-appearing (NA) tissues. The effect of radiotherapy on the brain microstructure can be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The aim of this study was to analyze regional DTI changes of white matter (WM) structures and to determine their dose- and time-dependency. METHODS: As part of a longitudinal prospective clinical study (NCT02824731), MRI data of 23 glioma patients treated with proton or photon beam therapy were acquired at three-monthly intervals until 36 months following irradiation. Mean, radial and axial diffusivity (MD, RD, AD) as well as fractional anisotropy (FA) were investigated in the NA tissue of 15 WM structures and their dependence on radiation dose, follow-up time and distance to the clinical target volume (CTV) was analyzed in a multivariate linear regression model. Due to the small and non-comparable patient numbers for proton and photon beam irradiation, a separate assessment of the findings per treatment modality was not performed. RESULTS: Four WM structures (i.e., internal capsule, corona radiata, posterior thalamic radiation, and superior longitudinal fasciculus) showed statistically significantly decreased RD and MD after RT, whereas AD decrease and FA increase occurred less frequently. The posterior thalamic radiation showed the most pronounced changes after RCT [i.e., ΔRD = -8.51 % (p = 0.012), ΔMD = -6.14 % (p = 0.012)]. The DTI changes depended significantly on mean dose and time. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in DTI for WM substructures were found even at low radiation doses. These findings may prompt new radiation dose constraints sparing the vulnerable structures from damage and subsequent side-effects.

Particle tracking, recognition and LET evaluation of out-of-field proton therapy delivered to a phantom with implants.

Objective.This study aims to assess the composition of scattered particles generated in proton therapy for tumors situated proximal to some titanium (Ti) dental implants. The investigation involves decomposing the mixed field and recording Linear Energy Transfer (LET) spectra to quantify the influence of metallic dental inserts located behind the tumor.Approach.A therapeutic conformal proton beam was used to deliver the treatment plan to an anthropomorphic head phantom with two types of implants inserted in the target volume (made of Ti and plastic, respectively). The scattered radiation resulted during the irradiation was detected by a hybrid semiconductor pixel detector MiniPIX Timepix3 that was placed distal to the Spread-out Bragg peak. Visualization and field decomposition of stray radiation were generated using algorithms trained in particle recognition based on artificial intelligence neural networks (AI NN). Spectral sensitive aspects of the scattered radiation were collected using two angular positions of the detector relative to the beam direction: 0° and 60°.Results.Using AI NN, 3 classes of particles were identified: protons, electrons & photons, and ions & fast neutrons. Placing a Ti implant in the beam's path resulted in predominantly electrons and photons, contributing 52.2% of the total number of detected particles, whereas for plastic implants, the contribution was 65.4%. Scattered protons comprised 45.5% and 31.9% with and without metal inserts, respectively. The LET spectra were derived for each group of particles identified, with values ranging from 0.01 to 7.5 keVµm-1for Ti implants/plastic implants. The low-LET component was primarily composed of electrons and photons, while the high-LET component corresponded to protons and ions.Significance.This method, complemented by directional maps, holds the potential for evaluating and validating treatment plans involving stray radiation near organs at risk, offering precise discrimination of the mixed field, and enhancing in this way the LET calculation.

Efficacy and safety of proton therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To comprehensively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety when utilizing proton therapy (PT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in head and neck cancer patients. Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies on comparative PT and IMRT outcomes. We performed a random effect model meta-analysis to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) for efficacy and safety outcome variables between PT and IMRT. From 641 identified articles, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3087 patients (606 treated with PT and 2481 with IMRT). On toxicity analysis, PT is associated with decreased acute grade 1 nausea (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.84, p = 0.02) compared to IMRT. In grade 2 toxicity, PT showed significant advantages over IMRT in mucositis (OR = 0.44, p < 0.0001), dysgeusia (OR = 0.35, p = 0.02), dysphagia (OR = 0.36, p < 0.0001), fatigue (OR = 0.29, p = 0.001), pain (OR = 0.34, p = 0.01), and weight loss (OR = 0.54, p = 0.02). Proton therapy also exhibited increased safety in grade 3 dysphagia incidence (OR = 0.44, p < 0.0001) compared to IMRT. PT demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) compared to IMRT across multiple time points: 1-year OS (HR = 0.43, p = 0.02), 2-year OS (HR = 0.44, p < 0.0001), and 5-year OS (HR = 0.78, p = 0.004). In terms of disease-free survival (DFS), PT also showed improved outcomes at 2-year DFS (HR = 0.65, p = 0.03) and 5-year DFS (HR = 0.81, p = 0.03). Proton therapy demonstrated superior overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and better local control rate (LCR) compared to IMRT. The data also showed better safety outcomes in PT patients, particularly when involving grade 2 acute toxicity events.

Visual Outcomes after Proton Therapy for Recurrent Uveal Melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: Proton beam reirradiation (PBI) remains an effective and globe-preserving alternative to enucleation in the treatment of local recurrence in uveal melanoma. The study aimed to assess visual outcomes and prognostic factors in visual acuity (VA) after proton beam salvage therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SUBJECTS: A retrospective study evaluated patients with recurrent uveal melanoma treated with PBI from 1984 through 2019 at a single academic tertiary center. METHODS: Patient and tumor characteristics were collected from the medical record, as well as best visual acuity (BVA) and ocular outcomes after treatment of recurrent uveal melanoma with PBI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the study was the BVA of patients after PBI for recurrent uveal melanoma. Additional outcome measures included enucleation rate of patients after salvage PBI and analysis of tumor and patient characteristics in the prognostication of VA. RESULTS: The study comprised 67 patients who received PBI for recurrent uveal melanoma. The median age at recurrence was 67.6 years (range, 31.6-91.0 years), and median follow-up from the time of recurrence to last examination was 4.4 years (range, 0.23-17.1 years). The median final BVA was hand motions (range, 20/20 to no light perception) and 6 (9.1%) patients maintained a Snellen VA 20/40 or better. The 5-year probability of VA retention of 20/200 or better was 19%. In a multivariable Cox model, VA at tumor recurrence of worse than 20/40 was found to be significantly associated with a VA of 20/200 or worse after retreatment with PBI. Twelve (18%) patients underwent enucleation after retreatment with PBI. CONCLUSIONS: Proton beam irradiation for the treatment of recurrent uveal melanoma allows for ocular preservation and functional vision in select patients. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Analytical parameterization of Bragg curves for proton beams in muscle, bone, and polymethylmethacrylate.

Proton dose calculation in media other than water may be of interest for either research purposes or clinical practice. Current study aims to quantify the required parameters for analytical proton dosimetry in muscle, bone, and PMMA. Required analytical dosimetry parameters were extracted from ICRU-49 report and Janni study. Geant4 Toolkit was also used for Bragg curve simulation inside the investigated media at different proton energies. Calculated and simulated dosimetry data were compared using gamma analysis. Simulated and calculated Bragg curves are consistent, a fact that confirms the validity of reported parameters for analytical proton dosimetry inside considered media. Furthermore, derived analytical parameters for these media are different from those of water. Listed parameters can be reliably utilized for analytical proton dosimetry inside muscle, bone, and PMMA. Furthermore, accurate proton dosimetry inside each medium demands dedicated analytical parameters and one is not allowed to use the water coefficients for non-water media.

Proton-beam Therapy for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: Case Report.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We report on a case of locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accompanied by an inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT), treated successfully with proton-beam therapy (PBT). CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old male presented with a primary, single HCC with IVCTT, without metastasis to the intrahepatic region, lymph nodes, or distant organs. The clinical staging was identified as T4N0M0 Stage IIIB. The patient's liver function was classified as Child-Pugh class A (score: 6), with a modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade of 2a. The patient had liver cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a nodular tumor measuring 13.2×8.9×9.8 cm across segments 1, 6, 7, and 8, along with IVCTT. The patient received PBT, with a total dose of 72.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) delivered in 22 fractions. Throughout the PBT treatment, the patient experienced no acute toxicities and completed the therapy as planned. Twelve months following PBT, the patient was alive without evidence of local recurrence, lymph node involvement, or distant organ metastasis. The only late toxicity observed was a mild worsening of the mALBI grade. CONCLUSION: We observed a favorable local response with manageable toxicities in a patient with locally advanced HCC and IVCTT treated with PBT. While this is a single case report, our findings suggest that PBT could be considered a viable treatment option for HCC with IVCTT.

Clinical Trials Radiographers identifying priority challenges associated with implementing a national programme of clinical trials in the United Kingdom's first proton beam therapy centre.

Objectives: This article is an evaluation of the current trial processes within a national proton beam therapy (PBT) clinical trial service in the United Kingdom. The work within the article identifies priority challenges associated with the implementation of PBT trials with a view to improving patient trial processes. Methods: The nominal group technique (NGT) was used. Five Clinical Trials Radiographers were asked the target question "what are the major challenges when implementing PBT clinical trials and facilitating PBT trial-related activities?" Participants individually and silently listed their challenges to the target question. Following this, group discussion clarified and refined responses. Participants then individually selected five challenges that they deemed most pertinent to the target question, giving a weighted score (out of 10). Individual scores were combined to provide a ranked, weighted order of challenges. Further group discussion identified improvement strategies to the highest scored challenges. Results: After combining lists generated by participants, 59 challenges were identified. Group discussion eliminated 27 responses. Eighteen were merged, resulting in 14 challenges. The two challenges that ranked highest were: (i) lack of initial understanding of the responsibilities of teams and who the relevant stakeholders were, and (ii) that a national PBT service requires the provision of shared care across multi-disciplinary teams and sites. Improvement areas include the development of shared protocols, clarifying stakeholder responsibilities and improving communication between centres to streamline PBT trial processes. Conclusions: This work has identified priority areas requiring development to improve the conduct of a national PBT clinical trials programme. Advances in knowledge: This is the first publication to evaluate current clinical trial processes for the United Kingdom's PBT service.

To become part of the team-patient experiences of participating in decision-making for a new treatment (proton beam therapy).

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experience of participation in the treatment decision of proton beam therapy versus conventional radiotherapy. BACKGROUND: Proton beam therapy (PBT) has become a treatment option for some cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. The decision to give PBT instead of conventional radiotherapy (CRT) needs to be carefully planned together with the patient to ensure that the degree of participation is based on individuals' preferences. There is a knowledge gap of successful approaches to support patients' participation in the decision-making process, which is particularly important when it comes to the situation of having to choose between two treatment options such as PBT and CRT, with similar expected outcomes. METHOD: We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected from interviews with patients who received PBT for their brain tumor. Transcribed verbatims from interviews with 22 patients were analyzed regarding experiences of participation in the decision-making process leading to PBT. FINDINGS: Participants experienced their participation in the decision-making process to a varying degree, and with individual preferences. Four themes emerged from data: to be a voice that matters, to get control over what will happen, being in the hand of doctors' choice, and feeling selected for treatment. CONCLUSION: A decision for treatment with PBT can be experienced as a privilege but can also cause stress as it might entail practical issues affecting everyday life in a considerable way. For the patient to have confidence in the decision-making process, patients' preferences, expectations, and experiences must be included by the healthcare team. Including the patient in the healthcare team as an equal partner by confirming the person enables and facilitates for patients' voice to be heard and reckoned with. Person-centered care building on a partnership between patients and healthcare professionals should provide the right basis for the decision-making process.

Using diffusion MRI to understand white matter damage and the link between brain microstructure and cognitive deficits in paediatric medulloblastoma patients.

PURPOSE: Survivors of medulloblastoma face a range of challenges after treatment, involving behavioural, cognitive, language and motor skills. Post-treatment outcomes are associated with structural changes within the brain resulting from both the tumour and the treatment. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to investigate the microstructure of the brain. In this review, we aim to summarise the literature on diffusion MRI in patients treated for medulloblastoma and discuss future directions on how diffusion imaging can be used to improve patient quality. METHOD: This review summarises the current literature on medulloblastoma in children, focusing on the impact of both the tumour and its treatment on brain microstructure. We review studies where diffusion MRI has been correlated with either treatment characteristics or cognitive outcomes. We discuss the role diffusion MRI has taken in understanding the relationship between microstructural damage and cognitive and behavioural deficits. RESULTS: We identified 35 studies that analysed diffusion MRI changes in patients treated for medulloblastoma. The majority of these studies found significant group differences in measures of brain microstructure between patients and controls, and some of these studies showed associations between microstructure and neurocognitive outcomes, which could be influenced by patient characteristics (e.g. age), treatment, radiation dose and treatment type. CONCLUSIONS: In future, studies would benefit from being able to separate microstructural white matter damage caused by the tumour, tumour-related complications and treatment. Additionally, advanced diffusion modelling methods can be explored to understand and describe microstructural changes to white matter.

Assessing alimentary tract radiation in liver cancer treatment with proton beam therapy: a PET/CT imaging study.

BACKGROUND: Proton beams deposit energy along their path, abruptly stopping and generating various radioactive particles, including positrons, along their trajectory. In comparison with traditional proton beam therapy, scanning proton beam therapy is effective in delivering proton beams to irregularly shaped tumors, reducing excessive radiation exposure to the alimentary tract during the treatment of liver cancer. METHODS: In this study, we utilized positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging to assess the total amount of radiation to the alimentary tract during liver cancer treatment with proton beam therapy, involving the administration of complex irradiation in 13 patients. RESULTS: This approach resulted in the prevention of excess radiation. The planned radiation restraint doses for the colon exhibited a significant correlation with the PET values of the colon (correlation coefficient 0.8384, P = .0003). Likewise, the scheduled radiation restraint doses for the gastroduodenum were correlated with the PET values of the gastroduodenum (correlation coefficient 0.5397, P = .0569). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT conducted after proton beam therapy is useful for evaluating excess radiation in the alimentary tract. Proton beam therapy in liver cancer, assessed via PET/CT, effectively reduced alimentary tract radiation, which is vital for optimizing treatments and preventing excess exposure.